User talk:Maury Markowitz/Archives/2013

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Target indicator, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flare (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Maury, you haven't responded yet to the issues on this DYK nomination despite the request above. Can you please stop by soon? Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:38, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

I've responded to your questions there. Let me know if there's anything that isn't clear. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:32, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Responded again. There's still work for you to do, and I hope to see a response from you soon. It would help if you could keep this template on your watchlist until the nomination process has been completed. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:06, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited SupraFAXModem 14400, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hayes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Maury Markowitz. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mailplane (software).
Message added 04:37, 15 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 04:37, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Magnetic-core memory, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Selectron (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Iconoscope (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Keystone and Spotlight

Storage tube (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to

Mainframe and Vector

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:35, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Dear Maury,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more.

Best regards, —

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Light bomber, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fighter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Dear Maury:

The PIPE Here...when I spotted your edit removing the content of "Hyper-engine class powerplants for the Luftwaffe" recently at the Hyper engine page, I had been wondering just where that content could be placed - perhaps as a suitably-entitled, full-blown article at Wikipedia - that the content COULD appear within, so it would stay available for reference needs.

A SIZABLE number of later-war German military aviation designs, particularly the ones still counting on piston engine technology, were depending on the sorts of high-output aviation powerplants like the Junkers Jumo 222, and I was the person responsible for placing the "Hyper-engine class powerplants for the Luftwaffe" content there in the first place.

If the "hyper engine" article is not the "best" place for it to be viewable, can you recommend a possible idea for a title for a brand-new Wikipedia page (if needed) for the content concerned to be placed within, or perhaps having the content still "en bloc" in one piece (at least for starters) at another article that already exists at Wikipedia, so it can still be accessed?

I'm firmly keeping the pre-edit version page in place as a bookmark in my browser...so that the content can be brought either into a new Wikipedia article, or can be added to an already-existing article where it might be a better fit.

Please let me know what ideas you might have, about my idea, when you've got the time...

The PIPE (talk) 19:54, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chevrolet Monte Carlo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Firewall (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:04, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:04, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Mr. Markowitz: If you cannot make a constructive comment, please refrain. Your background? - oh I see it: no background whatsoever in ADVANCED material sciences. NO qualifications WHATSOEVER to assess. May I ask, do you see advanced Biochemistry as being more or less specialized than advanced material sciences? If MORE, what is your basis? Have you seen the entry for (for example) Pyruvate dehydrogenase complex? Or maybe try Histone acetyltransferase. Are they easier or more difficult than the plain English of energetically modified cement? Or is it still too difficult for someone who has no background in ADVANCED material sciences? Please KNOW YOUR AUDIENCE and please stop giving the appearance of patronizing the SUBJECT by ASSUMING it's a "mickey mouse" or "low level" subject RIPE for the "armchair lawyer" brigade. Kind regards Jono2013 (talk) 03:07, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

It was not my intention to call you names, and for that, if I gave that impression I apologize. I have worked on the page for a month, and I have come to the end of my tether with users making the mistake that this is an "armchair lawyers" subject. The page itself is considerably "dumbed down" - and you will see in the talk page I have done my level best to contextualize. It is WIP and a highly complex one at that - more than 20 years of results and field data traduced into a "snapshot" page to appeal to all levels of scientifically-interested readers. But there are some subjects that no matter how much one tries, there is a limit to which they can be "simplified". So I certainly did not mean offense, I am just very tired and after a month of quietly going about building the page, I have had a torrid weekend of defending it left right and center all because a certain user posted it for deletion without even discussing first, on Friday, notwithstanding I am a new user, never done this before and the page is WIP. I have found the entire experience very very unprofessional. I am a retired senior life sciences professor - and in all my 58 years, I can tell you this will be the only page I ever contribute to on Wiki. I am appalled my the "gang mentality" that quickly surfaces and how those who take extreme actions seem beyond impunity, whereas the "best intentional" writer is placed against a wall.

That is how I feel. After losing an entire weekend. And Im afraid your comment just topped it off. So I withdraw and and apologize for any offence. I hope this meets with your favor.

Kind regards 14:15, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

• If you feel you need help with any of this, I am always willing to help with my MilHist Coordinator hat on. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:53, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Surface-to-air missile, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oerlikon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:26, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Revolutionary War. Since you had some involvement with the Revolutionary War redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 12:33, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

{{Use dmy dates}} is not a problem or cleanup tag as such, so it does not need to be removed when formats are in order. It merely indicates what style is in effect for the article, to assist editors, scripts, bots, etc. in keeping things consistent. Hope this explains things. Dl2000 (talk) 21:06, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lockheed MAC-16, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lockheed (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Maury Markowitz. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/MIM-4 Nike Ajax.
Message added 00:53, 24 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Go Phightins! 00:53, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 08:02, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

This article received over 15,000 page views, making it one of the top articles of the month. Well done! Hawkeye7 (talk) 13:23, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

If you can add the missing references, I can give you a free QPQ from my collection. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:30, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:53, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:38, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

The article Asturix, which you recently edited, is going through an AfD here. Richiguada ~ усилий и слава 20:43, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:32, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for clearing the article. But You forgot to put the approval tick.--Nvvchar. 01:15, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Maury Markowitz. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/INS Aridhaman.
Message added 02:45, 9 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

TheStrike Σagle 02:45, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi there, I've tried to answer your questions at Talk:Transdev Melbourne, but as you'll see, it's not really cut and dry. It's a convoluted situation. Liamdavies (talk) 17:05, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to De Re Atari may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks,

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dragonriders of Pern (video game) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks,

Hello, I'm

Just wondering, seen as you appear to be the first editor/creator of the initial article in oct 2002, if you contributed the explanation for the fission event that is described in the first few paragraphs?

I do not doubt the explanation, but didn't find much upon searching for journal references that explain how the fission event might occur. Moreover I'm also curious about the method by which a pure fusion weapon with antimatter could be achieved, as ultimately it would appear to contribute to a low fallout project orion propulsion take off.

Either way, the new 1000 second record for storage seems promising. - I added that edit in the article by the way, so I'm not just being an annoying citation needed requester for everything in the article. Boundarylayer (talk) 12:03, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply, the mechanism is probably pretty involved with some heavy quantum mechanical explanation no doubt, either way, I added a bit about anti-matter catalyzed pure nuclear fusion in the article recently. I'd appreciate it if you looked over it?

Thanks again

Boundarylayer (talk) 01:55, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 16:03, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

science, tech and aircraft
Thank you, pioneer of the wiki, for quality articles on science, tech, aircraft and their people, such as

awesome Wikipedian

(25 July 2010)!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:21, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Harrias ^talk 08:02, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Percom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MITS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I recently ran across the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nantero discussion, and noticed that you had done quite a bit of work improving the Nano-RAM article way back circa 2005. With a little work these two could probably be merged and saved. If you have time to comment or help rescue that would be appreciated. Thanks, W Nowicki (talk) 16:15, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered,

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Caproni Campini N.1 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to

Fuel economy

Carbon (API) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to

Graphics engine

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Check: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Asturix_(2nd_nomination) OsmanRF34 (talk) 17:09, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Central Ontario Railway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Prince Edward County

Naval Tactical Data System (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to SAGE

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:05, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cobourg and Peterborough Railway may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• railwaypages.com/pdf/The%20Midland%20Railway%20of%20Canada.pdf "The Miland Railway of Canada"], (Lindsay & District Model Railroaders, 2008.</ref>

Thanks,

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cobourg and Peterborough Railway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Prince Edward County

Kaleida Labs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to

Garbage collection

PLATO (computer system) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to

Mainframe

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:30, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

There are two

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hovercraft, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Castor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:01, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

It has been two weeks since the above request; please respond right away if you wish to pursue this nomination. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:05, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Thanks for updating the article. I was the creator of this article seven years so that is why I keep tabs on it. Back then inline citations were not so important but these days they make or break an article. I noticed that all of your edits to date have not included any inline citations which has me concerned. The lack of current inline citations should not deter you from adding them now. I find it best to add them in as I go. If you intend to add them in later, my apologies. Atrian (talk) 15:41, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ottawa, Arnprior and Parry Sound Railway, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Madawaska River and Fort William (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi, Maury, I'll be glad to help you with rail mapping. ShareMap does not have currently function to import KML/KMZ (the latter one is compressed KML) only GPX, but I can do this manually.

So please do following steps:

1. Register on ShareMap.org, and let me know what is your login
2. Send me your KMZ files by email (contact#sharemap,org)
3. I will import it into your space on ShareMap and then you will be able to freely modify fix it (I'll be glad to help you)

Regards

--Jkan997 (talk) 20:07, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Canada Atlantic Railway may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• '' (C&PL) would bridge the St. Lawrence at Coteau and connect to the [[Central Vermont Railway]]] just south of the river. The promoters failed to lay any track, mainly because the cost of
• * To the east of Two Rivers, the stretch to [[Whitney, Ontario|Whitney]] (just outside of [[Algonquin Park]] was abandoned in 1946 (16.46 miles or 26.49 km of track).

Thanks,

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to BMW 801 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• of engine service life. Other boost systems using fuel for charge cooling, known as C3-injectio), were developed and used until 1944. The serious fuel shortage in 1944 forced re-evaluating the
• 1942/1942%20-%201685.html |title=THE B.M.W. 801A|work=Flight|date= 13 August 1942 |format=pdf}}</

Thanks,

Asher, you have now twice reverted my good faith edit in SS Edmund Fitzgerald. Your reason is that the edit lacks explanation. However, the second edit included a full explanation of the change, and your checkin note actually refers to my note, so I don't see how you could claim it is lacking. I stand by my comment that the edit (greatly) improves the readability of the paragraph in question, and you have twice failed to provide any reason for the revert based on the content itself. So, what is your content-based reason for the revert? Maury Markowitz (talk) 15:23, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

I've read that section both ways five times now and can't really see what your change adds to the article. But since I don't really see it hurting either, I won't continue to stand in the way. I apologize - I tend to be protective of good articles.--Asher196 (talk) 15:45, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Looking through the edit history, it appears there are several other examples of GF edits being reverted. In those cases you offered no explanation at all for the RV, which kinda violates the principle you were applying in my example. In any event…

This RV removes a change that was clearly explained in the check-in note. Ship names do not have a "the" in the front of them. The details can be read in tiring depth here: Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(ships)#Using ship names in articles.

I am somewhat more ambivalent about this edit. Normally I prefer to include as many exlinks in an article as possible, as it makes the text more self-documented. However, it is also possible to spam link, so I'll leave this one alone.

Maury Markowitz (talk) 15:59, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

I never said I wasn't guilty of the same practice of not explaining my edits. Since I am frequently undoing IP vandalism and edits from new users which many times don't make sense or make the article worse, I simple revert the edit with no explanation to save time. As for the revert regarding removing "the" from ship names, I refer you back to north8000's talk page explanation that the article went through significant review and the "the" wasn't an issue. In an effort to keep the article in

WP:FA class status, I reverted. In summary, sometimes I take shortcuts and it comes back to bite me in the ass.--Asher196 (talk

) 16:00, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Demyansk Pocket, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Airbridge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Georgian Bay and Seaboard Railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madawaska River (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:09, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cobourg and Peterborough Railway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Trent River

Fusion power (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Induction

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to AppleTalk may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ca/books?id=Dj8EAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA12 "TOPS Teleconnector Connets PC's with Own Flashtalk Networks"]], ''InfoWorld'', 25 January 1988, p. 12</ref> MS-DOS networking system over AppleTalk</ref> system

Thanks,

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:22, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nuclear power phase-out may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• asp?subchannel_id=48&story_id=21976&name=Addicted+to+nuclear+energy%3F Addicted to nuclear energy? < Belgian news | Expatica Belgium]. Expatica.com. Retrieved on 2011-06-04.</ref>
• October 2008 |url=http://www.nature.com/climate/2008/0810/pdf/climate.2008.99.pdf |format=PDF}} ] '''', Vol. , , pp. .</ref><ref>[[Mark Diesendorf]] (2007). ''[[Greenhouse Solutions with

Thanks,

The article Murderball has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Better to move

WP:MADEUP

children's games not mentioned in the linked articles.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --BDD (talk) 23:53, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

• Did you mean to contest this? You removed the tag but only said "oops" as your edit summary. --BDD (talk) 20:06, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Murderball is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murderball until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BDD (talk) 21:23, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Boeing RC-1.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:18, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Boeing RC-1, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fort Churchill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

) 22:49, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	awesome, man Chu42 (talk) 00:25, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Some stroopwafels for you!

Maury deserves this. Chu42 (talk) 00:26, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

OMG, I love those things! Maury Markowitz (talk) 00:35, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Concorde (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Robert Burton and Lockheed

Fairey Delta 2 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Rolls-Royce and Center of pressure

Handley Page HP.115 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Span

Main battle tank (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Rolls-Royce

Short Brothers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Rolls-Royce

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Maury, this is a ping to remind you of your outstanding QPQ reviews that are required for your current nominations on LASNEX and the Boeing RC-1. You indicated that you'd be doing the one for the LASNEX back on November 24; if you think it's going to be much longer, please say so on the nomination page. The usual grace period is a week; I'm happy to let it ride for an extra week without a response (I can't guarantee that others will be as generous), but as of December 8 it risks being closed. Thanks for your attention. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:45, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Concorde, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Center of pressure (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Q-go#Notability. -- Trevj (talk • contribs) 12:37, 10 December 2013 (UTC) -- Trevj (talk • contribs) 12:37, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for your interest in my Telex notes. From my own observations, the article seems unsound to be discussing Telex as a uniquely German phenomenon from the 1930s. I wasn't able to make a direct update to the article as I don't have the quality of information & the sources to hand that I would want to be confident in this; the references I gave are in a National Archive and UK Post Office archive and would need some hours spent there to extract something meaningful. And even then, I wouldn't know enough about it in an international context.

But I'm sure that there must be books or magazines that properly discuss the world-wide history of telex. The book cited in the article - The Worldwide History of Telecommunications - seems misleading as, from Chapter 50, it doesn't define telex other than a trade name of Western Union dating from 1962. This is plainly wrong as the references I gave show that "telex" was being used by the GPO from 1930. I would think that the WP article needs to be more precise and specify what telex was for, what its standards are (were) and as well as the actual history of the brand. But its beyond my area of expertise to do that. Best regards, Ephebi (talk) 16:04, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Maury, it's been two weeks since the last post to this nomination, and you still owe a quid pro quo review on it. I have to ask: will you ever be doing a QPQ review here, or should I close this one? And, if you aren't going to be doing QPQ reviews going forward, perhaps you shouldn't submit nominations for DYK. Absent you doing any reviews, there's no chance of a nomination getting approved and promoted, but a good chance that someone will start a review of the nomination, not knowing that their time will turn out to have been wasted. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:39, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi I do not agree with your view about that the Hawk replaced the Nike (operational). So I adde3d a not to the talk page of the Nike Hercules.--2001:981:54D4:1:C1B9:C4EE:8AB4:C4B9 (talk) 21:24, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 20:02, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

I didn't want to wholesale revert, but the para change is wrong. B-77, B-83, B-90 were always Bs not a W. The -53 was TX-53 to Mk-53 to (B-53 and W53) about simultaneously. Your simplification's just wrong... Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 15:57, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

hey I noticed that you reviewed this nom and passed it, but I'm not sure. If it did indeed pass, can you put {{subst:DYKtick}} in your review so it will be flagged as complete? thanks. Thingg^⊕⊗ 00:52, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

• Maury, I put a comment in your nomination of Template:Did you know nominations/Boeing RC-1, which this is the QPQ for, asking for more detail on your Bryan Lathrop review and also for you to add the appropriate icon to the result. (Without an icon, whether approval or an indication of more work needed, a review is not complete, and a nomination can't be promoted without that final approval icon.) Please let me know when that's ready, so your Boeing RC-1 nomination can proceed. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:54, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Maury Markowitz. You have new messages at Bwmoll3's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Maury Markowitz. You have new messages at Bwmoll3's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Maury Markowitz. You have new messages at Bwmoll3's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi. Thanks for taking on the SAGE article. you can see from ed hist that I attempted to clean up this difficult article but I lost the will to live after a while. Will assist if I am around. I think it was seriously over edited by others after you created it. Its a great article, but its been MIL-SPECCED to death :) Cheers!

talk

) 00:23, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

I had the same thing happen… I was editing in pieces all day adding a short explanation of the whole idea of air control. Then I Refreshed *a different window* and Safari decided to refresh the editor too. Gone! Oh well, second time writing anything is always better… Maury Markowitz (talk) 13:06, 30 December 2013 (UTC)