User talk:Mn1548

Hi Mn1548! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Since when is swedishcharts.com an official site to judge what is a single? It doesn't even state that it is a single. I've given a reference stating that the song was released in 2014 and if that reference isn't good enough I'll give a better one. The only one adding incorrect changes is you by putting it under 2015. AAron 8967 (talk) 09:54, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@AARON 8967: It archives the Swedish Charts (And other countries as well) therefore I think it's an official site to judge. They recorded it in 2014, doesn't mean it was released in 2014. Also if you scroll back far enough on Axwell Λ Ingrosso's Instagram you'll find the same information from the artists them selves!Mn1548 (talk) 11:04, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Mn1548: If you go to 69 weeks ago on their instagram they have information saying it was released in 2014. The music video for Can't Hold Us Down was released in 2015. And if a song enters a chart it does not make it a single. The Swedish Charts doesn't say that it is. I've given two references saying it was released in 2014 from complex and google play and I'll give another one from dej jam the record company their signed to.

@AARON 8967: If a song is released separate from and album, then it is released as a "single" format!Mn1548 (talk) 20:22, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stop using

Please ensure that you include a link to your previous account,

multiple accounts.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:38, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

@Ponyo: How would one do that?Mn1548 (talk) 18:47, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You could just add the link to your old user page (User:Nathanaelsadgrove) after "Old Account Broke:" on your new user page. I can do it for you if you're unsure.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:55, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ponyo: I mean code format, is it just the same as a standard page?Mn1548 (talk) 19:02, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just type [[User:Nathanaelsadgrove]] and save it. Sundayclose (talk) 19:04, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Sundayclose: Thank you Mn1548 (talk) 19:46, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ponyo - the link was removed, although Mn1548's back to the same kind of thing Nathanaelsandgrove collected the warnings for. Pinkbeast (talk) 04:14, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As far as socking is concerned, I'm not too worried about the removal as the link is in the user page history as well as in this talk page section, and there has been no overlap in the account usage. -- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:48, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mn1548. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Summertime Ball, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Raye. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please make sure the information in references you're deleting is contained in other references on the page. On

Sorry, thanks for fixing the mistake User:Mn1548

You claimed in your edit summary here "F.F.F." is a single and wrote "NOTE: Reference was included..." (cut off?) but yet you have provided no reference with your edit that indicates it is a single. The difference is "Galway Girl" and "Don't Let Me Be Yours" were both announced as singles. Has "F.F.F." been called a single? Ss112 19:21, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ss112 The rest of that was "...reference was included but it prevented the edit from saving, if anyone could find a reference that worked it would be much appreciated". By the way if my references that I tried to include (from Billboard and YouTube) are incorrect, please correct the edit. The song did following the same release as the songs mentioned (One after the album it's from but wasn't given its own one songed album) thus is and should be classed as a single. User:Mn1548

Ina Wroldsen was not credited on "How Deep Is Your Love", so it is not appropriate to include the song in her discography, and it's been removed. I'm pretty sure you've been warned about this practice before. For instance, Beyoncé quite notably had her vocals on Coldplay's "Hymn for the Weekend" but the song is not on her discography because she was not officially credited. Putting "uncredited" next to it does not excuse it. Ss112 00:20, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved the discussion to Talk:Robin Schulz discography, as it seems more appropriate for that page, as you are seeking changes to the page that may be controversial. Ss112 16:22, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:30, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Coldplay's songs did not gain those chart positions because Avicii remixed them. You're taking chart positions of songs that Avicii remixed after the fact, and attributing their success to Avicii. That's original research unless they are credited as being Avicii's remixes on sites. Do not reinstate said information to Avicii's discography without proof. This will be considered disruption and be reverted. If you want to reply, you can do so here, or discuss it on Talk:Avicii discography. There is no need to open a duplicate topic on my talk page. Ss112 15:28, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ss112: Firstly, I never credited an Avicii remix of a Coldplay song; and secondly, I put no chart positions on the remix part of the table I split.

However regarding the production table, surely those songs got there chart positions and certifications due to all the production and songwriting that went into making the song. My intent was to add the chart positions and certifications of those songs like in the rest of the discography. Note: I was unable to find an overall reference for the chart positions as the credit artists were different but references for the certifications were there and for Avicii producing the songs. Please tell me if given chart positions for production credits is a "no" for the reason that finding overall chart references are hard, or for any other reason as the no original research policy doesn't really say anything against as as the cerdit of "producer" has been made clear. Mn1548 (talk) 17:42, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, my mistake: I meant you created an unsourced chart table for Avicii's production work. It's original research because there were no references. If you can't find references for material you're adding, you shouldn't be adding it. Full stop. You also added fake peaks of Devil Pray: it didn't reach number 3 in France, let alone any chart, and its peak in Sweden was number 16 on the Digital chart, not the overall singles chart. Ss112 17:46, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ss112: OK. Charts and Certifications should be avoided for production credits. However I still think the table should be split and some songs removed as the apper in "As featured artist" as "Other charted songs". Mn1548 (talk) 17:56, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mn1548. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The album column does not mean "which albums is the song included on?" because if it did mean that, every compilation a song subsequently appears on should be listed too. Is it for other discographies? No. It means which album or release (EP, mixtape, compilation, live album and so on) it was released in promotion of. The note was there for a reason. Don't come along and disregard it because you think you know better. Thanks. Ss112 00:55, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Spotify is a streaming media WP is an encyclopedia. We don't refer to backing vocals on the track list and no this has nothing to do with WP:OR. Plus in Edit warring it does not matter who and why started it you just need to avoid it. So if you still have problems discuss it here first before reverting. CerberaOdollam (talk) 13:49, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@CerberaOdollam: Firstly, you made the edit with out discussing and the reason why backing vocalists are not normally included is because they are not normally credited but in this case they are so they should be added. Mn1548 (talk) 14:24, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If either of you are going to discuss the matter (which neither of you have done properly), it will be at the article talk page, not someone's user talk page. Mn1548, as the person making the edit, you should have started the discussion (see my edit summary}, and CerberaOdollam, you shouldn't be encouraging to start a discussion here. I've started a split proposal at the Hugh Jackman talk page, so feel free to have this discussion there as well as weigh in on the proposal. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 00:21, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The only thing that qualifies Lee Grant as having been given the #13 jersey is United officially announcing either his squad number specifically or the squad as a whole. As you can see on the club's website, Grant has not yet been officially given a number. The only reason Fred has is so people can start buying his shirt! –

Firstly, I will post comments wherever I damn well please. Feel free to delete this afterwards, but if you post on my talk page, I'm going to respond on yours. That's just the way I do it, and there's no Wikipedia policy to say it's the wrong way. Secondly, squad numbers worn in friendlies are, by definition, unofficial. The club have on several occasions allowed a player to wear one number in a friendly before changing it for competitive matches. The number he wears in a friendly is just that, a number worn in a friendly. He's free to change it any time he or the club wishes. –

Jay 20:26, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

@Ss112: "Spectrum (Say My Name)", the remix, is the version which went number 1 not the album version called "Spectrum".^[1][2] And I think you'll find Calvin Harris was officially credited on the remix,^[3] which is why "Spectrum (Say My Name)" was originally on that list. I made the edit because I noticed it had been removed. Mn1548 (talk) 09:02, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The list did not previously state Calvin Harris had another number one with "Spectrum (Say My Name)" before you added it. Also, the Official Charts article you just cited doesn't actually say or credit Calvin Harris as a lead or featured artist. Nor does the cover art of the remix; nor does the article Spectrum (Say My Name). They just state that he remixed it. Where do we draw the line? Did Calvin also have another number one because he produced "I Will Never Let You Down" by Rita Ora, which went to number one? Also, Spotify was nowhere near as relevant as it is now in 2012 when that song went to number one, so I hardly see how what they choose to credit it as now matters. Spotify doesn't decide everything. What matters is that is not how the Official Charts Company credits it—according to them and all other media I've seen reporting on it, Calvin has had eight number ones on which he is credited according to the OCC. Ss112 10:21, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ss112: The list did previously state it as a number 1. That's how I realised it was missing. Spotify/Apple Music etc uses official credits for songs as I believe you pointed out previous regarding Beyoncé and Hymn for the Weekend. A production, while technically would count as being a number 1, we would not included as there are no official credits. A remix on the other hand is completely different as it is a different version of the original songs which in this case is quite important as the remix performed considerably better than the original. Finally the main article does credit the Calvin Harris remix as number 1 - read it "Spectrum (Say My Name)". Mn1548 (talk) 10:42, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you added it to Harris' number ones on that list in 2017 and it was rightfully removed after that by another editor. Dude, I did read Spectrum (Say My Name), and you don't seem to know what I'm referring to: the infobox and the cover art contained on that article do not credit Calvin Harris as a lead or featured artist. The cover art does not say "Florence and the Machine & Calvin Harris" or even "featuring Calvin Harris". Linking me directly to the section titled "Calvin Harris remix" is unnecessary because that section doesn't really say anything different. Calvin is not credited by the Official Charts Company, who have specifically stated he's had eight number ones in the 2010s decade and ten overall here. Remixers are not always given lead or featured credit on the songs they remix. I'm done arguing with you, so if you tag or reply to me again, you're really wasting your time because you won't be getting another from me. Ss112 20:42, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Marcus Rashford. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:10, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mn1548. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zac Efron discography until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — 

]

Disambiguation link notification for January 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Will Grigg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Sharpe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Scott McTominay youth career

Hello, I've started a discussion at Talk:Scott McTominay regarding the "youth career" issue. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 16:54, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Cribinau into St Cwyfan's Church, Llangwyfan. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:01, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa: OK, thankyou for the heads up. I wasn't aware of this. I shall remember for next time. Mn1548 (talk) 11:56, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at

Swedish House Mafia Reunion Tour

(April 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stevey7788 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia is not a schedule of tours and small one-off events. Please see

WP:NOT

.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Swedish House Mafia Reunion Tour
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  db-self
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
  may be deleted
  .
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Stevey7788 (talk) 13:30, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Avicii, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:45, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@

Vargas & Lagola are associated acts of Avicii. May I also point out that no acts on that list are sourced and neither is that section of the infobox sourced for the vast majority of other artists. Correct me if I'm wrong ut the definition of "associate act" that Wikipedia uses is a minimum of two or more collaboration (at least that's what it seems to be based of other edits of the same natute). By that definition the information I added to the Infobox is already sourced throughout the article and does not need to be resorced in the infobox as no other artist is. Mn1548 (talk) 15:17, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

"Correct me if I'm wrong"...I already did by reverting your edit and leaving a caution on your talk page. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:52, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Magnolia677: Well then...Please do the next logical thing and explain why I'm wrong and what constitutes an "associate act" so this thing doesn't happen again. Mn1548 (talk) 07:16, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Any material added to an article that "is likely to be challenged" needs to include an inline citation, per Wikipedia:Verifiability. Magnolia677 (talk) 12:54, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Magnolia677: Thats still not you answering the question I asked of "What is an associated act?" So seen as you're unable to let's do this properly. Template:Infobox musical artist states that an associated act should follow on of four criteria. One of which:

Acts with which this act has collaborated on multiple occasions, or on an album, or toured with as a single collaboration act playing together

Such times

Vargas & Lagola

have collaborated with Avicii include:

• You Make Me
• Hey Brother
• Waiting for Love
• Friend of Mine
• Without You
• Peace of Mind
• Tough Love
• Excuse Me Mr. Sir

If this doesn't class as "collaborated on multiple occasions" then I don't know what does. Information is generally not sourced in infoboxs as it is a summary of the main article where such information is already sourced. Now do I need to source these here and now or are you able to click the links and see that the collaborations have been sourced on their respective pages and are also sourced on the main page as well! Mn1548 (talk) 16:09, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Phil Neville. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 12:26, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mattythewhite: Please check the edit history and you will find that it is indeed sourced. Thankyou. Mn1548 (talk) 12:57, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It should be sourced in the article itself. What use to our readers is a link when it's hidden away in an edit summary? Mattythewhite (talk) 13:23, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well realise the mistake and move it there then. Most things in the infobox aren't sourced like his position as England manager just to give an example. Putting the source in the edit summary is common practice for small infobox changes so please check the edit summary of an edit before you blindly revert it. Thankyou. Mn1548 (talk) 13:32, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That content is already sourced in the prose. Please ensure that you cite content properly in future if you don't want to be "blindly" reverted. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:33, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at

Swedish House Mafia Reunion Tour

has been accepted

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation

if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 17:23, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject

.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:47, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at

Manchester United Treble Reunion

has been accepted

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation

if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

James-the-Charizard (talk to me!) (contribs) 19:30, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply ]

Disambiguation link notification for December 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gee Cross, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aka (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2019 Wigan Warriors season has been accepted

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation

if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 00:45, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2018 Wigan Warriors season has been accepted

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation

if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 00:51, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of

Manchester United Treble Reunion

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Manchester United Treble Reunion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manchester United Treble Reunion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –

Jay 21:23, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Disambiguation link notification for April 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019 Wigan Warriors season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Craven Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:54, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: International Dance Music Awards (April 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at International Dance Music Awards instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:International Dance Music Awards and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:International Dance Music Awards, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:10, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Creamfields, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Giggs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:38, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at

Articles for creation

: 2020 Wigan Warriors season

2020 Wigan Warriors season, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

talk) 09:38, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2017 Wigan Warriors season has been accepted

2017 Wigan Warriors season, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 00:40, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at

2012 Wigan Warriors season

(May 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more references

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:2012 Wigan Warriors season
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  Draft:2012 Wigan Warriors season, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoingBatty (talk) 16:05, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at

Articles for creation

: 2014 Wigan Warriors season

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CNMall41 (talk) 07:26, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2012 Wigan Warriors season has been accepted

2012 Wigan Warriors season, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 18:18, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2005 Wigan Warriors season (June 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was:

There is no lead section - see

WP:LEAD

.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2005 Wigan Warriors season and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2005 Wigan Warriors season, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoingBatty (talk) 00:52, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2000 Wigan Warriors season has been accepted

2000 Wigan Warriors season, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zanimum (talk) 00:31, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2001 Wigan Warriors season has been accepted

2001 Wigan Warriors season, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zanimum (talk) 00:31, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2002 Wigan Warriors season has been accepted

2002 Wigan Warriors season, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zanimum (talk) 00:38, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2003 Wigan Warriors season has been accepted

2003 Wigan Warriors season, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zanimum (talk) 00:42, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2004 Wigan Warriors season has been accepted

2004 Wigan Warriors season, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zanimum (talk) 00:42, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1999 Wigan Warriors season has been accepted

1999 Wigan Warriors season, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zanimum (talk) 00:43, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paul Pogba, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bruno Fernandes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2005 Wigan Warriors season (July 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiAviator was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Where's your lead? You should give a brief description of what the subject is, but not write something like a preface, stating what does this article outline.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2005 Wigan Warriors season and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2005 Wigan Warriors season, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiAviator (talk) 07:28, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stretford Paddock (July 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stretford Paddock and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Stretford Paddock, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 16:18, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Challenge cup final articles

How much are you going to expand on these articles other than copying and pasting information from the parent article? This looks more like creating articles for the sake of it rather than providing a good experience for the reader who can no not read for example the complete account of the

WP:COPYWITHIN and providing attribution as required of the contributions you have copied. Nthep (talk) 13:15, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

@

2019 would be the minimum. Mn1548 (talk) 14:18, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

OK but look at this the other way round. How much information is there in

WP:SPLITTING

and the objective of providing a good reading experience to readers.

Strangely enough this is the second discussion on a similar topic today. I am also querying separate articles for the pool games for the 2021 RLWC on the same basis. What are they going to add that couldn't be included in the overarching 2021 RLWC article. Nthep (talk) 14:41, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Nthep: OK I see your point. My original approach to this was to create a basis overview and expanded later after connecting 2009 to 2019. But from this a one at a time approach is probably best. Creating one at a higher standard than bringing them all up gradually. Mn1548 (talk) 14:53, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Create a basis by all means but a) make sure you comply with

2009 Challenge Cup Final see if you can get that to GA status then you know the challenge for the other articles. Nthep (talk) 15:10, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

@Nthep:OK Thanks for the help. Mn1548 (talk) 15:13, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Dean Henderson, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:05, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply ]

Disambiguation link notification for December 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 Wigan Warriors season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Bateman.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:38, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Stretford Paddock

Hello, Mn1548. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Stretford Paddock

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission

and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

this link

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Extraordinary Writ (talk) 16:19, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Quadruple (rugby league) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created,

general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 04:32, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Concern regarding Draft:2005 Wigan Warriors season

article space

.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

userfication

of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

here

.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 09:02, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Good Friday Derby

Hi, you need to edit the Wigan-Saints rivalry page to the version you had it at Good Friday Derby and then request that an admin properly moves the Wigan-Saints rivalry page to Good Friday Derby over the redirect as cut and paste title changes are forbidden. @Nthep: may be able to further assist, they're an admin I've seen around on the RL pages. c87d98b10 09:32, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

County Cups

If you want to merge the articles then there probably needs to be a merge discussion first. These three articles have a chequered history and there looks to have been an undiscussed (afaik) and partial merger in 2019. Having a discussion should settle it once and for all. If they are merged then it needs to be done correctly to retain attribution and not just copying and pasting. Nthep (talk) 17:41, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Quadruple (rugby league) (May 26)

The Treble (rugby league)

Greenman (talk) 21:22, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2005 Wigan Warriors season

Hello, Mn1548. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2005 Wigan Warriors season

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission

and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

this link

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 10:23, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Hull Derby

On 15 July 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hull Derby, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that rugby league's Hull F.C. forced rugby union's Hull KR out of their home ground by paying triple the rent before the teams became part of rugby league's Hull Derby? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hull Derby. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Hull Derby), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:03, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 2021 Challenge Cup Final

On

2021 Challenge Cup Final between Castleford and St Helens today will be played at a half-full Wembley Stadium? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2021 Challenge Cup Final. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 2021 Challenge Cup Final), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page

.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thatto Heath's history is separate from Saints as the women's team has continued after the formation of the Saints womens team. I know it was a wholesale move/co-operative approach but you can't credit THC achievements prior to 2018 to St Helens. Nthep (talk) 16:42, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Nthep: The current Thatto Heath women's side is essentially the reserve / feeder team of St Helens women (See RFL statement on the team's acquisition). Therefore anything achieved by Thatto Heath pre St Helens takeover can be accredited to them as they are the same team. Mn1548 (talk) 16:47, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Debatable - that might have been the intention in 2018 but is that what has happened since? I doubt it. This isn't a simple renaming like Bradford Thunderbirds becoming Bradford Bulls where there is no dispute about the achievements carrying over, but similar to the Chorley Lynx situation, they weren't the inheritors of Blackpool Borough's heritage. Nthep (talk) 17:00, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Nthep: From the way I read the RFL article it seems clear that St Helens Women are the continuation of Thatto Heath. The current Thatto Heath, can't claim the heritage, as it's explicitly stated that they are the reserve team. It's therefore logical to state that St Helens does inherited the heritage of the original Thatto Heath as there is no mention of Thatto Heath exiting the league and later reforming like what happened Blackpool Borough. Also please elaborate on the phrase "is that what has happened since". Mn1548 (talk) 19:09, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Despite a hope expressed at the time there is nothing to show that since 2018 THC have acted at Saints women's reserve team. THC continue to play independently and as a 2020 article in the St Helens Star says "Saints Women took over from Thatto Heath Crusaders in taking the town's place in Super League in 2018." [1] It's a situation analogous to the purchase of Gateshead by Hull Sharks to keep Hull's Super League status. Nthep (talk) 20:02, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There's another aspect to this as well, reputable sources like the BBC and Sky are reporting Saints as being the first team to win the Treble. Suggesting that their definition is Cup, League Leaders Shield and Super League Grand Final, not any precursor to the WSL in women's rugby league. Thoughts? Nthep (talk) 21:26, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Nthep: In terms of the clubs being separate, I have just seen an article on the St Helens Star saying that it is the club's first treble which would indicate separate clubs. What I would like to see in regards to this issue is an article on St Helens's or Thatto Heath's website explain the take over. In terms of the BBC stating it is the first ever women's treble I don't like. The definition of a treble in British rugby league, is League Leader and Grand Final in what ever first division league is currently running and the Challenge Cup which Thatto Heath achieved in 2016. The question is therefore is the RFL Women's Rugby League the predecessor of the RFL Women's Super League. The way both article are written suggested it was but there are no sources for it, so with out having to rewrite large parts of those articles when there aren't any sources to contradict what's already there I'd hold off on removing Thatto Heath as treble winners unless a good enough source can be found stating that the WRL was not the predecessors to the WSL and not an official top teir league for women's rugby league in the UK. Mn1548 (talk) 21:56, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry I wasn't planning on removing anything to do with THCs 2016 Treble, just to start the discussion over was it first or not. I see even the RFL are saying yesterday was the first though [2] Nthep (talk) 08:25, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Nthep: The only thing I can assume then is that in the WRL era there was no league leaders sheild awarded as a physical trophy. It's definitely safe to say it's the first treble of the WSL era, which is probably the best phrasing to use. Mn1548 (talk) 09:40, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

sounds like the safest bet. Nthep (talk) 10:34, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, Mn1548. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:04, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

@Nthep: OK, thankyou for the clarification. Mn1548 (talk) 10:45, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting the move on the World Cup article. Nthep (talk) 14:28, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rugby.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2026 FIFA World Cup. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:22, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Underwater Hockey European Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Underwater Hockey European Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mccapra (talk) 21:18, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 1 August 2022,

UEFA Women's Euro 2022 Final, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Black Kite (talk) 15:28, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

The only thing notable that I see is that all three are being played on the same day but even so that's a footnote to the matches themselves, not the headline. Nthep (talk) 14:31, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@

that page. Maybe if the projected popularity in women's rugby occurs following the World Cup then the women's final might warrant its own pages, especially as it's now at Wembley. But the whole thing really needs a redirect at the moment now I'm thinking about it. Mn1548 (talk) 15:41, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

About your edit edit adding st Helen’s and Bradford to the league leaders column for 1996 and 1997. Since there was no grand final those years they don’t need to be in the league leaders column as they were the champions. Post 1998 champions and league leaders are different achievements and not necessary for 96-97 Northern Wonder (talk) 21:27, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Northern Wonder: St Helens and Bradford were still league leaders that year. Just because league leaders and champions were the same thing doesn't discount them from being league leaders. Also putting not applicable in that column is factual incorrect as teams did finish first in regular season. Just because there was no playoffs doesn't remove league leaders as being such. Mn1548 (talk) 21:35, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mn1548 (talk) The league leaders column is for teams who won the league leaders shield though. It’s a bit confusing having saints and Bradford in both columns when there was no league leaders shield, there was just champions and runners up

@Northern Wonder: Surely the note explains that though, anyway its a lot less ambiguous now you've changed that column from "League Leaders" to "League Leaders' Shield" and that should make it clearer for people who haven't read the note. Mn1548 (talk) 12:38, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mn1548. Thank you for creating

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:39, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anfield was removed from the schedule a whole year ago and replaced by the DW Stadium. Liverpool will no longer open the Women's tournament which has now gone to Leeds.

I have heavily improved the venues sections across all four RLWC 2021 articles in the last 24 hours. Given the short period of time I imagine there's a chance that you may have not noticed the edits but that section is (imo) to a really good standard that is consistent and relevant in its information to each tournament (and not just stadiums but training bases and etc.) I welcome a second pair of eyes and scrutiny over these edits but twice now you have done so citing inaccuracies in your summaries (though done in good faith). Comment by James Lewis Bedford (talk) 14:56, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your edit summary I have now added bracketed information specifying the venues of the women's and wheelchair tournaments in the venue section (Special:diff/1117782519) with the rest already implied in that paragraph. A full read of the current page would not leave any unambiguity on this paticular issue without even the need to visit the individual articles.

In your edit summary you imply that there are missing capacities plural but I can only find this for English Institute of Sport. This was intentionally left (hence the dash) as the complex has no set capacity and will depend on the room they use (which will vary). I removed the needs fixing tag as I can not find any errors with that section. If you spot something specifically that you can not fix, please let me know and I will see if I can. Comment by James Lewis Bedford (talk) 15:30, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@JamesLewisBedford01: My appologies, I was aware that Anfield was no longer being used in the men's tournament but I thought it was still being used for the women's opener. Yeah, it's a bit hard keeping track of what's going on with these pages at the moment and exactly what should be on what page with the 2021 world cup now taking a different format in presentation to previous world cups. Sorry again. Mn1548 (talk) 15:34, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, it makes sense that you might have thought it was still being used in the women's tournament as that is what it had said as late as a 20 October version before I recently edited it (which is probably hard to find as there were lots of edits in the edit history).

On the Opening Ceremony section, I left that in the men's tournament in the end as in fairness there is not really any reliable sources saying it won't happen in the other tournaments as much as there isn't any saying it will so I guess there is no point trying to change anything before the first women's game is played. You could very well be right. Comment by James Lewis Bedford (talk) 15:45, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@JamesLewisBedford01: Cheers, I've also altered the venues table a bit, just ordering them a but better. Thanks again. Mn1548 (talk) 15:52, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A decision needs to be made on whether or not to split Cardiff Arms Park - To split or not to split. There are two options which have been agreed. SethWhales ^talk 16:46, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Would 14 days from 17 November be an acceptable time to complete the discussions, i.e. 1 December? Let me know if you disagree. SethWhales ^talk 17:14, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Seth Whales: No that seems quite acceptable to me. Mn1548 (talk) 20:56, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wheelchair rugby league, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gillingham.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Southsea, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. David Biddulph (talk) 13:11, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ––FormalDude (talk) 08:13, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2023 Women's Challenge Cup, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nthep (talk) 20:16, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I just thought that having the teams split into separate maps, it would be easier to see them. But I'll leave it at it is now to avoid any arguments etc :)

L1amw90 22:57, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@L1amw90: Yeah I get that, it just results in too many maps and is inconsistent with all other SL pages. Mn1548 (talk) 14:51, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mn1548. Thank you for your work on

Thanks for creating the article! Hopefully you will write more article, have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:17, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth
  (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent
  of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:RFL Women's Regional League
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 22:56, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2020 National Conference League has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable enough for a stand alone article. It should be incorporated into the main article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BostonMensa (talk) 12:26, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2021 National Conference League has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reason for stand alone article. Merge into main article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BostonMensa (talk) 12:30, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth
  (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent
  of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

See

WP:NLIST

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of British and Irish sporting systems and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 19:22, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2019 National Conference League is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019 National Conference League until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:58, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2015 National Conference League is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 National Conference League until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:59, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Varsity team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Varsity.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've got concerns that moving the articles from 2025 to 2026 is not the best way to go about things. I've posted at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rugby league#2026 world cups as to why. Nthep (talk) 18:32, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concerns noted. I support your proposal on the wikiproject but as mentioned it does need to be done with proper linking between the two. Mn1548 (talk) 18:42, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2026 Women's Rugby League World Cup qualification has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

All information here now redundant due to the tournament rescheduling

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the

]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2024 Women's Challenge Cup Final (August 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Paul Vaurie were:

This submission is not adequately supported by

reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not'

for more information.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

WP:CRYSTAL

. Too early for such article, or at least for now.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2024 Women's Challenge Cup Final and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Paul Vaurie (talk) 03:51, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2024 Challenge Cup Final (August 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission is not adequately supported by

reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to be a news report of a single event and may not be notable enough for an article in Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#NEWS and Wikipedia:Notability (people)#People notable for only one event

for more information.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Simple case of

WP:TOOSOON

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2024 Challenge Cup Final and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 04:47, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stadium names...

Why does nobody else bother about what Stadium names go on what pages? Why does it only bother you... One admin who also edits these pages never bothers me, so I don't get why it bothers you. I've never had any complaints from anyone except you... So why does it matter what names go on here..? And no, I'm not causing an argument... L1amw90 20:38, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@L1amw90: It matters because that is the policy and consensus in place on Wikipedia.

The fact that I have presented these to you and have politely ask you to follow them on mutiple previous occasions, and every time you have not bothered to reply to me and instead go back a re revert my edits often breaking tables and removing valid content and references in the process. Of course I have got frustrated.

You have never attempted to have a conductive conversation on this topic only do disruptive edits to pages for who knows what reason. This is your first attempt of having a conversation about this with me and you question was essentially "why does following Wikipedia policy and editor concensus matter?" If that is your view please stop editing.

Also you said "I've never had any complaints from anyone except you". I don't know if you ment that in relation to the stadium names or in general, but on your talk page, the last 50 edits (25 really because you delete everything) you have 3 complaints.

Also you said "every time I edit something, you immediately jump in my talk page". The last time I was on your talk page, looking at the edit history, we had a constructive discussion on formatting the Women's Super League season pages. So why you are seemingly incapable of having a constructive conversation on this topic is beyond me.

As editors we should be following policy and we have discussions if we want to change them. The concensus, as previously sent to you, is that we DO NOT use sponsored names where it can be avoided. So please, do not change the names of stadium in text, if they were to be refered to that way on Wikipedia, then their article would be called that name. Mn1548 (talk) 21:17, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of British and Irish sporting systems

request

that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 20:02, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ole Gunnar Solskjær, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forward.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women's Super League

Hey, I've undone your edit for the women's playoffs etc, as I didn't think it made any sense. I thought it would be better to just use the structure they did for last season? I mean, if you want to re add it then fair enough, I just thought it would be easier for people to understand etc :). L1amw90 13:05, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's fair, will look to stucture similar to men's. Mn1548 (talk) 13:34, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at

RFL Women's Regional Super League

(September 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was:

This submission is not adequately supported by

reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Right now, the sources I'm seeing for this article are all primary sources coming from the rugby league itself. This may not be a major problem in the long run, but I do think that for right now, this may be an instance of the article being made

too soon

and before the subject has been covered by sources that are more independent than what is currently present in the article. This topic may be notable later, but to my understanding, unless reliable secondary sources are added, this might not have the necessary independent coverage as it stands.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:RFL Women's Regional Super League
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:32, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: RFL Women's Nines has been accepted

RFL Women's Nines, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:35, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

150th Anniversary Heritage Match

The article

150th Anniversary Heritage Match has been proposed for deletion

because of the following concern:

Not convinced a friendly match merits its own article just because it's marking an anniversary.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your

the article's talk page

.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 05:42, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of

150th Anniversary Heritage Match

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

150th Anniversary Heritage Match is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/150th Anniversary Heritage Match until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jmorrison230582 (talk) 08:07, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Ashes (rugby league) merge

Came on wikipedia to do the merge myself and found it already been done. Great work new page is looking good!

EDIT: Sorry wasn't signed in when I posted that! Mollsmolyneux (talk) 16:37, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, glad you like it. Mn1548 (talk) 16:39, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2023 Rugby League European Championship B (September 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

I am wholly unclear from what is written what the significance of "B" is.

It is obviously some form of subgroup, yet the article appears to suggest that the entirety of the championship has only six nations competing.

Before resubmission, please use the lead section to make it 100% clear what "B" is. Are there A, C, D, etc? Does it therefore require a navigation template between them?

While you are clarifying this, please double-check your references. Many of them may be considered to be primary sources. Please minimise those (See

WP:PRIMARY

and add some which show significant coverage in independent reliable sources.

By the time you have done this matches will have started. At present I would decline this as

not news

. We record what is said by others. We do not set out to be first with the news.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2023 Rugby League European Championship B and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:37, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of British and Irish sporting systems

Hello, Mn1548. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of British and Irish sporting systems

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:59, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of British rugby league league leaders

moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to

List of British rugby league league leaders

. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back.

talk 13:06, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

"

The Ashes (rugby league); 2023–" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect The Ashes (rugby league); 2023– has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 15 § The Ashes (rugby league); 2023– until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 09:03, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at

RFL Grading

(October 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tagishsimon was:

Can you give some more thought to title of this article. How easy is it for a reader in, say, Nigeria, who is unfamiliar with rugby league, to understand from the title what the article is about? Does calling the article RFL Grading cut it? If the name supported by the references?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:RFL Grading
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tagishsimon (talk) 17:18, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at

IMG 2024 Grading for the British Rugby Football League

has been accepted

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I agree that it is too soon for an article, maybe wait until the scores/analysis have come out after the games conclude.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2023 Rugby League European Championship B and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 23:57, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't do this any more.

You've done another one here on Elite One Championship 2023–2024. Looks like a cut-and-paste from 2023–24 French Rugby League season, which additionally you have put a redirect into without making it a redirect. Redirects don't have content - you can't leave a load of content on a redirect page. I've tried to tidy it up by replacing the redirect with a link. You don't fully seem to understand a lot of how to move pages, how redirects work and how the MOS works - I'm happy if you want to check with me first before moving articles or putting in redirects, always willing to help. --Bcp67 (talk) 15:45, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In this instance I don't see how I can move one page into three. From my understanding of the move function it just moves one page to another of a different name. Mn1548 (talk) 15:51, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article you need to read then is

WP:HISTMERGE and understand about attribution. Bcp67 (talk) 15:58, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Cheers, thanks. Mn1548 (talk) 16:00, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 15:38, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2025 Rugby League World Cup is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2025 Rugby League World Cup until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 15:20, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mn1548,

Thank you for creating 2026 Women's Rugby League World Cup qualification.

Hi Mn1548. The new article relies solely on two references so far - would it be possible to include additional

WP:RS

sourcing, especially secondary sources. I would also recommend inclusion in additional appropriate categories.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 15:27, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello Mn1548!

• The
  New Pages Patrol
  is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read
  project talk page
  with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider
  applying here
  .

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mn1548. Thank you for your work on

Hi, Mn1548, excellent start on your new article. I would suggest including it in appropriate Wikiprojects.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 21:42, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

RFL Women's Championship, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Toadette ^{(Let's talk together!)} 19:42, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]