User talk:Richie1509

Hi Richie1509! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:35, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Richie1509 (talk) 03:15, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Hawkedin. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Hawkedin (talk) 04:48, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks Richie1509 (talk) 05:19, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On Chinese Communist Party, do not just ignore notes asking you to discuss first by just writing over them instead. Thank you. Remsense ‥ 论 06:54, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Cassiopeia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Cassiopeia talk 02:16, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem Richie1509 (talk) 02:27, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm S0091. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Alberto Fujimori, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. S0091 (talk) 21:13, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Richie1509! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 12:46, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A second reminder also to please use descriptive

edit summaries, especially when undoing the work of other editors. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 12:46, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Manmohan Singh, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Per consensus, please don’t add number order. GrabUp - Talk 09:11, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nicaraguan constitutional reform

According to CNN, the reform must pass a second legislative vote next year before becoming law.[1]. Please stop vandalizing. Mike Rohsopht (talk) 10:52, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Richie1509 (talk) 20:02, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Opinion polling on the first Donald Trump administration, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

. Thanks, ]

December 2024

]

Isn't his current height 2.06 m? Also, I was indeed wrong about his height as his height was 2 m a few years ago. But I think that we should use his height in centimetres besides in feet and inches. Richie1509 (talk) 23:56, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You entered his height as 2 cm, and the template added 1 in. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:31, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see, thanks for letting me know. And I totally apologise for not knowing the mistake in Barron's height. Once again, thanks for letting me know. Richie1509 (talk) 04:34, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I'm TEMPO156. Your recent edit(s) to the page Abdel Fattah al-Burhan appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TEMPO156 (talk) 14:20, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Richie1509! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:34, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Republican Party has 49 seats in the US Senate, until January 3, 2025. Be patient. GoodDay (talk) 14:45, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Richie1509 (talk) 20:58, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have to cite the sources which mentions explicitly and which are reliable like website of the govt of Syria. The sources you have given had told nothing about him holding an official post. Therealbey (talk) 01:42, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to

. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 11:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Richie1509. Thank you for your work on 2026 Djiboutian presidential election. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

WP:Notability means in-depth coverage in the sources. There is currently not ANY coverage in the sources. IMO because it is wp:Too soon

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 22:08, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We do indeed use ampersands 1) as used in quotes and titles, and 2) with consistency and discretion in tables, infoboxes, and similar contexts where space is limited. FYI, this style tip was written by User:Tony1, and that user is as close to a style guru as we have. BusterD (talk) 13:39, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Syria, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. DO NOT remove protection templates from pages that are protected. Period. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 10:35, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a

Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 10:38, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

]

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reminding me Richie1509 (talk) 19:56, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leader of the Liberal Party of Canada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Brown.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia as you did at Christian Democratic Union of Germany: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Theofunny (talk) 07:40, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia as you did at Ulysses S. Grant: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia. Per Note b of the article, the S. does not stand for "Simpson". - Shearonink (talk) 23:05, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Hibatullah Akhundzada. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. TEMPO156 (talk) 06:13, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Vice President of Namibia. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is

]

Hello, could you add edit comments to your edits please? It's difficult to determine the helpfulness of them, especially as some of them seem unsourced. I may undo a couple of your edits that are unsourced, especially those without edit comment.

]

Sure Richie1509 (talk) 19:36, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

]

Thanks for your contributions to Generalissimo of the Dominican Republic. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back.

]

Links to draft articles

]

Redirect?

Hi, I've seen you redirect "President of the State of Palestine" to "President of Palestine". By chance, have you reached consensus? The page is a crucial

]

Oh... Make sure to request protection and make edits, because this is gonna break things :) HwyNerd Mike (talk | contribs) 04:48, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion though not closed has been made to move the page from President of the State of Palestine to President of Palestine. Thus, instead, can you help move the page? Richie1509 (talk) 04:49, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'll see. This is definitely going to mess a bunch of things up, because there are articles that still use the term "State of Palestine" (e.g. VP of the State of Palestine), so these articles might need a bunch of change if consensus is reached that all articles will use the new term. I'm not yet extended confirmed, so I can't do much, but I suggest leaving the other articles alone for now and only move them once consensus is reached for a definite move on the President article. I asked for protection on the President article. HwyNerd Mike (talk | contribs) 04:54, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, the reason why the page Vice President of the State of Palestine is called that was because when it was created just a few days ago, the president page was called President of the State of Palestine, but now that it's moved, I'll also move the vp page.

Besides, it's just like Israel, people officially refer to Israel as the State of Israel, but the page here for president is called President of Israel rather than President of the State of Israel. Richie1509 (talk) 04:57, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That makes more sense now. But since you moved these articles, you'll have to change most of the "State of Palestine" to "Palestine", or else it's kinda confusing honestly. HwyNerd Mike (talk | contribs) 04:59, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea! But can you help me with that please? Richie1509 (talk) 05:01, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure! You can edit the VP page (I can't edit that), and I'll try to fix things on the President page (if it's not protected, didn't check). HwyNerd Mike (talk | contribs) 05:02, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks! Richie1509 (talk) 05:03, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Jagmeet Singh did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a

Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Misopatam (talk) 07:23, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Richie1509,

Per Wikipedia's Manual of Style for biographies and parliamentary procedure, an individual ceases to be a Member of Parliament (MP) when Parliament is dissolved—that is, when the writs are dropped—not on election day. If the person does not win re-election, their term is officially considered to have ended on the date of dissolution, and they are no longer styled as “MP” after that point. This aligns with

, which states that post-nominals like "MP" should not be used once the individual has left office. Please ensure biographies and infoboxes reflect this standard by ending the term at dissolution and removing the "MP" title if they did not return to Parliament. Please no not engage in ]

Okay, thanks! Richie1509 (talk) 07:33, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Richie1509,

What possessed you to just move a Talk page without moving an article? This just results in an orphaned talk page which means the talk page is deleted which I don't think was your intent. So, instead, I had to go through the page history to track down where you moved this page from and return it back to where the article was left.

First, you should discuss moves first. But always move an article or category or template along with a talk page or basically you are asking for the talk page to be deleted.

If you have questions about page moves, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:17, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Liz, thank you so much for reaching out to me! Yes, I'm sorry about moving the talk page without moving the official page. I tried to move the page name but for some reason, I couldn't. But can you please help me move the page name

President of Togo? Thanks! Richie1509 (talk) 08:35, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply

]

About Liberal Leadership for Peter Dutton

Hi Richie1509, I noticed you changed Petter Dutton’s Liberal leadership date in his Wikipedia. According to my current resource. He already made a ‘graceful exit’ from politics. You can check the results from 9 news (https://www.9news.com.au/national/federal-election-2025-peter-dutton-back-in-canberra-after-losing-seat-liberal-party-defeat/d26513ce-8e12-42f3-9ba3-d18bf6f3b691). Currently the Liberal leadership is vacant .(Please check this Wikipedia: Leader of the Liberal Party of Australia)

In this case, if you still believe Petter Dutton is still a Liberal Leadership currently. Please present your reference which ensures his Wikipedia is not confusing any audience and keep his information is integrity.

Thanks you Renzhiyan7755 (talk) 01:09, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that he lost his seat, but John Howard lost his seat in 2007, but then he remained as leader of the Liberal Party for five more days thus, the same is for Peter Dutton? Richie1509 (talk) 03:59, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please present the reference of John Howard which he still remained as leader of the Liberal Party. If you found it, and then please present the similar reference which relates to Peter Dutton.

Please note, do not make any assumptions or intentions without any reference in the Wikipedia.

Thank you! Renzhiyan7755 (talk) 04:23, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All good! No problem! Richie1509 (talk) 05:37, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So, can you please revert your edit for Peter Dutton as becoming liberal leader from 30 May 2022 to 3 May 2025? There is no evidence or any reference to cite that he is still a liberal leader.

However, I got reference on the top which cited by 9 news (they mentioned that he made a ‘graceful exit’ politics, which means he is neither an opposition leader nor liberal leader now). This page Leader of the Liberal Party of Australia has been shown the current liberal leader is vacant.

Please revert your change. Otherwise, I will report to administrator.

Thank you! Renzhiyan7755 (talk) 08:19, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done ✅️ Richie1509 (talk) 08:32, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I really appreciate that! Renzhiyan7755 (talk) 09:57, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All good, no problem! 👍 Richie1509 (talk) 18:56, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Doug Weller, can you please tell me clearly on why you have blocked me? I have done nothing wrong and also, I have an account and have no IP address. Please, tell me why. Thanks! Richie1509 (talk) 20:49, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Of course you have an IP address. How else would you access an Internet site?!? --Yamla (talk) 21:05, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes, but can you please unblock me? I have been blocked but then I believe that I have done nothing wrong to get that block, so can you please unblock me? Thanks! Richie1509 (talk) 03:21, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My IP Address is 49.224.64.0/18 BTW Richie1509 (talk) 03:28, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Yamla That would explain things but as they can still edit they don't appear to be blocked. Doug Weller talk 10:29, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So is it that I am not blocked anymore or I can still edit a bit? @Doug Weller? Richie1509 (talk) 10:44, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not blocked it seems, keep editing and see what happens. Doug Weller talk 10:45, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You mean if I keep on editing, I will actually be blocked? Richie1509 (talk) 10:50, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't a threat at all. Doug is pointing out that you aren't blocked, as proven by your ability to edit. If that changes, if you are hit by an IP address block, we should look into that. But so long as you are able to edit articles, there's nothing further to be done. --Yamla (talk) 11:45, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, okay. Thanks! Richie1509 (talk) 19:28, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to

for the page, as there are no sources covering the actual election. Can be published once anything comes out. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 18:36, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see, thanks! Richie1509 (talk) 18:46, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have updated the page with new sources and now published it. Feel free to continue to add on to the page. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 03:13, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Richie1509 (talk) 04:10, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of heads of state of Burkina Faso, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Upper Volta.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:00, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Already done tick ✅️ Richie1509 (talk) 08:05, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, for linking country names please mind

]

New message to Richie1509: Moon Jae-in Image

Could you explain more on why you reverted the 2025 image back to the 2017 one? You said in your summary that it was in your opinion, better to put one in the presidency. Consensus never agreed to your revert. The 2017 image is of lower quality than the 2025 image. It's best to only do it when it's the official portrait. Freedoxm (talk · contribs) 07:15, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the image that you've said from 2017 is actually from 2019 and the 2025 one isn't actually a portrait. But then if the recent image is better, then let's keep it. Thanks! Richie1509 (talk) 07:32, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]