Republican Party (United States)
Republican Party | |
---|---|
Abbreviation | GOP |
Chairperson | Michael Whatley |
Governing body | Republican National Committee |
Speaker of the House | Mike Johnson |
Senate Minority Leader | Mitch McConnell |
House Majority Leader | Steve Scalise |
Founders | Alvan E. Bovay[1] Henry J. Raymond[2] |
Founded | March 20, 1854 Ripon, Wisconsin, U.S. |
Merger of | Whig Party[3][4][5][6] Free Soil Party[7] Anti-Nebraska movement[8] |
Headquarters | 310 First Street SE, Washington, D.C., U.S. |
Student wing | College Republicans High School Republican National Federation |
Youth wing | |
Women's wing | National Federation of Republican Women |
Overseas wing | Republicans Overseas |
Ideology |
|
Political position | Center-right[14] to right-wing[15] |
International affiliation | |
Elections |
The Republican Party, also known as the GOP (Grand Old Party), is one of the
The party was founded in 1854 by
Under the leadership of Lincoln and a Republican Congress, the Republican Party led the fight to defeat the Confederate States in the American Civil War, preserving the Union and abolishing slavery. Afterward, the party largely dominated the national political scene until the Great Depression in the 1930s, when it lost its congressional majorities and the Democrats' New Deal programs proved popular. Dwight D. Eisenhower's election was a rare break in between Democratic presidents and he presided over a period of increased economic prosperity after World War II. His former vice president Richard Nixon carried 49 states in 1972 with what he touted as his silent majority. The 1980 election of Ronald Reagan realigned national politics, bringing together advocates of free-market economics, social conservatives, and Cold War foreign policy hawks under the Republican banner.[21] Since 2009, the party has faced significant factionalism within its own ranks and has shifted towards right-wing populism.[a]
In the 21st century, the Republican Party receives its strongest support from
History
19th century
In 1854, the Republican Party was founded in the
At the first public meeting of the anti-Nebraska movement on March 20, 1854, at the Little White Schoolhouse in Ripon, Wisconsin, the name "Republican" was proposed as the name of the party.[38] The name was partly chosen to pay homage to Thomas Jefferson's Democratic-Republican Party.[39] The first official party convention was held on July 6, 1854, in Jackson, Michigan.[40]
The party emerged from the great political realignment of the mid-1850s, united in pro-capitalist stances with members often valuing
At the Republican Party's
The Republicans were eager for
Reconstruction, the gold standard, and the Gilded Age
Following the
Grant was a Radical Republican, which created some division within the party.
The 1876 presidential election saw a contentious conclusion as both parties claimed victory despite three southern states still not officially declaring a winner at the end of election day. Voter suppression had occurred in the South to depress the black and white Republican vote, which gave Republican-controlled returning officers enough of a reason to declare that fraud, intimidation and violence had soiled the states' results. They proceeded to throw out enough Democratic votes for Republican Rutherford B. Hayes to be declared the winner.[60] Still, Democrats refused to accept the results and the Electoral Commission made up of members of Congress was established to decide who would be awarded the states' electors. After the Commission voted along party lines in Hayes' favor, Democrats threatened to delay the counting of electoral votes indefinitely so no president would be inaugurated on March 4. This resulted in the Compromise of 1877 and Hayes finally became president.[61]
Hayes doubled down on the gold standard, which had been signed into law by Grant with the Coinage Act of 1873, as a solution to the depressed American economy in the aftermath of that year's panic. He also believed greenbacks posed a threat; greenbacks being money printed during the Civil War that was not backed by specie, which Hayes objected to as a proponent of hard money. Hayes sought to restock the country's gold supply, which by January 1879 succeeded as gold was more frequently exchanged for greenbacks compared to greenbacks being exchanged for gold.[62] Ahead of the 1880 presidential election, Republican James G. Blaine ran for the party nomination, supporting both Hayes' gold standard push and his civil service reforms. After both Blaine and opponent John Sherman failed to win the Republican nomination, each of them backed James A. Garfield for president. Garfield agreed with Hayes' move in favor of the gold standard, but opposed his civil reform efforts.[63][64]
Garfield won the 1880 presidential election, but was assassinated early in his term. His death helped create support for the Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act, which was passed in 1883;[65] the bill was signed into law by Republican president Chester A. Arthur, who succeeded Garfield.
In 1884, Blaine once again ran for president. He won the Republican nomination, but lost the general election to Democrat Grover Cleveland. Cleveland was the first Democrat to be elected president since James Buchanan. Dissident Republicans, known as Mugwumps, had defected from Blaine due to the corruption which had plagued his political career.[66][67] Cleveland stuck to the gold standard policy,[68] but he came into conflict with Republicans regarding budding American imperialism.[69]
Republican Benjamin Harrison defeated Cleveland in the 1888 election. During his presidency, Harrison signed the Dependent and Disability Pension Act, which established pensions for all veterans of the Union who had served for more than 90 days and were unable to perform manual labor.[70] Following his loss to Cleveland in the 1892 presidential election, Harrison unsuccessfully attempted to pass a treaty annexing Hawaii before Cleveland could be inaugurated. Most Republicans supported the proposed annexation,[71] but Cleveland opposed it.[72]
In the 1896 presidential election, Republican William McKinley's platform supported the gold standard and high tariffs, having been the creator and namesake for the McKinley Tariff of 1890. Though having been divided on the issue prior to that year's National Convention, McKinley decided to heavily favor the gold standard over free silver in his campaign messaging, but promised to continue bimetallism to ward off continued skepticism over the gold standard, which had lingered since the Panic of 1893.[73][74] Democrat William Jennings Bryan proved to be a devoted adherent to the free silver movement, which cost Bryan the support of Democratic institutions such as Tammany Hall, the New York World and a large majority of the Democratic Party's upper and middle-class support.[75] McKinley defeated Bryan[76] and returned the presidency to Republican control until the 1912 presidential election.[77]
First half of the 20th century
Progressives vs. Standpatters
The Republicans returned to the presidency in the 1920s, winning on platforms of normalcy, business-oriented efficiency, and high tariffs.[79] The national party platform avoided mention of prohibition, instead issuing a vague commitment to law and order.[80] The Teapot Dome scandal threatened to hurt the party under Warren G. Harding. He died in 1923 and Calvin Coolidge easily defeated the splintered opposition in 1924.[81] The pro-business policies of the decade produced an unprecedented prosperity until the Wall Street Crash of 1929 heralded the Great Depression.[82]
Roosevelt and the New Deal era
The New Deal coalition forged by Democratic president Franklin D. Roosevelt controlled American politics for most of the next three decades, excluding the presidency of Republican Dwight D. Eisenhower in the 1950s. After Roosevelt took office in 1933, New Deal legislation sailed through Congress and the economy moved sharply upward from its nadir in early 1933. However, long-term unemployment remained a drag until 1940. In the 1934 elections, 10 Republican senators went down to defeat, leaving the GOP with only 25 senators against 71 Democrats. The House likewise had overwhelming Democratic majorities.[83]
The Republican Party factionalized into
Historian
After 1945, the internationalist wing of the GOP cooperated with Truman's Cold War foreign policy, funded the Marshall Plan and supported NATO, despite the continued isolationism of the Old Right.[87]
Second half of the 20th century
Post-Roosevelt era
Eisenhower had defeated conservative leader senator Robert A. Taft for
From Goldwater to Reagan
Historians cite the 1964 presidential election and its respective National Convention as a significant shift, which saw the conservative wing, helmed by Arizona senator Barry Goldwater, battle liberal New York governor Nelson Rockefeller and his eponymous Rockefeller Republican faction for the nomination. With Goldwater poised to win, Rockefeller, urged to mobilize his liberal faction, retorted, "You're looking at it, buddy. I'm all that's left."[89][90]
Following the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Voting Rights Act of 1965, the southern states became more reliably Republican in presidential politics, while northeastern states became more reliably Democratic.
Though Goldwater lost the election in a landslide, Ronald Reagan would make himself known as a prominent supporter of his throughout the campaign, delivering his famous "A Time for Choosing" speech for Goldwater. Reagan would go on to win the California governorship two years later.
The GOP would go on to control the White House from 1969 to 1977 under 37th president Richard Nixon, and when he resigned in 1974 due to the Watergate scandal, Gerald Ford became the 38th president, serving until 1977. Ronald Reagan would later go on to defeat incumbent Democratic President Jimmy Carter in the 1980 United States presidential election, becoming the 40th president on January 20, 1981.[91]
Reagan era
The
Reagan's vice president, George H. W. Bush, won the presidency in a landslide in the 1988 presidential election. However, his term was characterized by division within the Republican Party. Bush's vision of economic liberalization and international cooperation with foreign nations saw the negotiation and, during the presidency of Democrat Bill Clinton in the 1990s, the signing of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the conceptual beginnings of the World Trade Organization.[98] Independent politician and businessman Ross Perot decried NAFTA and predicted that it would lead to the outsourcing of American jobs to Mexico; however, Clinton agreed with Bush's trade policies.[99]
Bush
Gingrich Revolution
In the 1994 elections, the Republican Party, led by House minority whip Newt Gingrich, who campaigned on the "Contract with America", won majorities in both chambers of Congress, gained 12 governorships, and regained control of 20 state legislatures. The Republican Party won control of the House of Representatives for the first time in 40 years, and won a majority of U.S. House seats in the South for the first time since Reconstruction.[102][103]
However, most voters had not heard of the Contract and the Republican victory was attributed to traditional mid-term anti-incumbent voting and Republicans becoming the majority party in the South for the first time since Reconstruction, winning many former Southern Democrats.[104] Gingrich was made speaker, and within the first 100 days of the Republican majority, every proposition featured in the Contract was passed, with the exception of term limits for members of Congress, which did not pass in the Senate.[105][104] One key to Gingrich's success in 1994 was nationalizing the election,[103] which in turn led to his becoming a national figure during the 1996 House elections, with many Democratic leaders proclaiming Gingrich was a zealous radical.[106][107] The Republicans maintained their majority for the first time since 1928 despite Bob Dole losing handily to Clinton in the presidential election. However, Gingrich's national profile proved a detriment to the Republican Congress, which enjoyed majority approval among voters in spite of Gingrich's relative unpopularity.[106]
After Gingrich and the Republicans struck a deal with Clinton on the Balanced Budget Act of 1997, which included tax cuts, the Republican House majority had difficulty convening on a new agenda ahead of the 1998 elections.[108] During the ongoing impeachment of Bill Clinton in 1998, Gingrich decided to make Clinton's misconduct the party message heading into the elections, believing it would add to their majority. The strategy proved mistaken and the Republicans lost five seats, though whether it was due to poor messaging or Clinton's popularity providing a coattail effect is debated.[109] Gingrich was ousted from party power due to the performance, ultimately deciding to resign from Congress altogether. For a short time afterward, it appeared Louisiana representative Bob Livingston would become his successor; Livingston, however, stepped down from consideration and resigned from Congress after damaging reports of affairs threatened the Republican House's legislative agenda if he were to serve as speaker.[110] Illinois representative Dennis Hastert was promoted to speaker in Livingston's place, serving in that position until 2007.[111]
21st century
George W. Bush
Republican
The Republican Party remained fairly cohesive for much of the 2000s, as both strong
The Republican Party lost its Senate majority in 2001 when the Senate became split evenly; nevertheless, the Republicans maintained control of the Senate due to the tie-breaking vote of Bush's vice president, Dick Cheney. Democrats gained control of the Senate on June 6, 2001, when Vermont Republican senator Jim Jeffords switched his party affiliation to Democrat. The Republicans regained the Senate majority in the 2002 elections, helped by Bush's surge in popularity following the September 11 attacks, and Republican majorities in the House and Senate were held until the Democrats regained control of both chambers in the 2006 elections, largely due to increasing opposition to the Iraq War.[121][122][123]
In the 2008 presidential election, Arizona Republican senator John McCain was defeated by Illinois Democratic senator Barack Obama.[124]
Tea Party movement
The Republicans experienced electoral success in
The Tea Party movement's electoral success began with Scott Brown's upset win in the January Senate special election in Massachusetts; the seat had been held for decades by Democrat Ted Kennedy.[136] In November, Republicans recaptured control of the House, increased their number of seats in the Senate, and gained a majority of governorships.[137] The Tea Party would go on to strongly influence the Republican Party, in part due to the replacement of establishment Republicans with Tea Party-style Republicans.[129]
When Obama was re-elected president in 2012, defeating Republican Mitt Romney,[138] the Republican Party lost seven seats in the House, but still retained control of that chamber.[139] However, Republicans were unable to gain control of the Senate, continuing their minority status with a net loss of two seats.[140] In the aftermath of the loss, some prominent Republicans spoke out against their own party.[141][142][143] A 2012 election post-mortem by the Republican Party concluded that the party needed to do more on the national level to attract votes from minorities and young voters.[144] In March 2013, Republican National Committee chairman Reince Priebus issued a report on the party's electoral failures in 2012, calling on Republicans to reinvent themselves and officially endorse immigration reform. He proposed 219 reforms, including a $10 million marketing campaign to reach women, minorities, and gay people; the setting of a shorter, more controlled primary season; and the creation of better data collection facilities.[145]
Following the 2014 elections, the Republican Party took control of the Senate by gaining nine seats.[146] With 247 seats in the House and 54 seats in the Senate, the Republicans ultimately achieved their largest majority in the Congress since the 71st Congress in 1929.[147]
Trump era
In the 2016 presidential election, Republican nominee Donald Trump defeated Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton. The result was unexpected; polls leading up to the election showed Clinton leading the race.[148] Trump's victory was fueled by narrow victories in three states—Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin—that had been part of the Democratic blue wall for decades.[149] It was attributed to strong support amongst working-class white voters, who felt dismissed and disrespected by the political establishment.[150][151] Trump became popular with them by abandoning Republican establishment orthodoxy in favor of a broader nationalist message.[149]
After the 2016 elections, Republicans maintained their majority in the Senate, the House, and governorships, and wielded newly acquired executive power with Trump's election. The Republican Party controlled 69 of 99 state legislative chambers in 2017, the most it had held in history.[152] The Party also held 33 governorships,[153] the most it had held since 1922.[154] The party had total control of government in 25 states;[155][156] it had not held total control of this many states since 1952.[157] The opposing Democratic Party held full control of only five states in 2017.[158] In the 2018 elections, Republicans lost control of the House of Representatives, but strengthened their hold on the Senate.[159]
Over the course of his presidency, Trump appointed three justices to
Trump lost
In 2022 and 2023, Supreme Court justices appointed by Trump proved decisive in landmark decisions on gun rights, abortion, and affirmative action.[170][171] The party went into the 2022 elections confident and with analysts predicting a red wave, but it ultimately underperformed expectations, with voters in swing states and competitive districts joining Democrats in rejecting candidates who had been endorsed by Trump or who had denied the results of the 2020 election.[172][173][174] The party won control of the House with a narrow majority,[175] but lost the Senate and several state legislative majorities and governorships.[176][177][178] The results led to a number of Republicans and conservative thought leaders questioning whether Trump should continue as the party's main figurehead and leader.[179][180] Despite this, Trump easily won the nomination to be the party's candidate again in the 2024 presidential election.[181]
Current status
As of 2024, the GOP holds a majority in the
Name and symbols
The Republican Party's founding members chose its name as homage to the values of republicanism promoted by Democratic-Republican Party, which its founder, Thomas Jefferson, called the "Republican Party".[183] The idea for the name came from an editorial by the party's leading publicist, Horace Greeley, who called for "some simple name like 'Republican' [that] would more fitly designate those who had united to restore the Union to its true mission of champion and promulgator of Liberty rather than propagandist of slavery".[184] The name reflects the 1776 republican values of civic virtue and opposition to aristocracy and corruption.[185] "Republican" has a variety of meanings around the world, and the Republican Party has evolved such that the meanings no longer always align.[186][121]
The term "Grand Old Party" is a traditional nickname for the Republican Party, and the abbreviation "GOP" is a commonly used designation. The term originated in 1875 in the
The traditional mascot of the party is the elephant. A political cartoon by Thomas Nast, published in Harper's Weekly on November 7, 1874, is considered the first important use of the symbol.[188] An alternate symbol of the Republican Party in states such as Indiana, New York and Ohio is the bald eagle as opposed to the Democratic rooster or the Democratic five-pointed star.[189][190] In Kentucky, the log cabin is a symbol of the Republican Party.[191]
Traditionally the party had no consistent color identity.[192][193][194] After the 2000 presidential election, the color red became associated with Republicans. During and after the election, the major broadcast networks used the same color scheme for the electoral map: states won by Republican nominee George W. Bush were colored red and states won by Democratic nominee Al Gore were colored blue. Due to the weeks-long dispute over the election results, these color associations became firmly ingrained, persisting in subsequent years. Although the assignment of colors to political parties is unofficial and informal, the media has come to represent the respective political parties using these colors. The party and its candidates have also come to embrace the color red.[195]
-
An 1874 cartoon by Thomas Nast, featuring the first notable appearance of the Republican elephant[196]
-
The red, white and blue elephant
-
The GOP banner logo, c. 2013
-
A GOP banner logo, c. 2017
Factions
Civil War and Reconstruction era
During the 19th century, Republican factions included the
20th century
The dawn on the 20th century saw the Republican party split into an
21st century
Republicans began the 21st century with the election of
Right-wing populism became an increasingly dominant ideological faction within the GOP throughout the 2010s and helped lead to the election of Donald Trump in 2016.[150] Starting in the 1970s and accelerating in the 2000s, American right-wing interest groups invested heavily in external mobilization vehicles that led to the organizational weakening of the GOP establishment. The outsize role of conservative media, in particular Fox News, led to it being followed and trusted more by the Republican base over traditional party elites. The depletion of organizational capacity partly led to Trump's victory in the Republican primaries against the wishes of a very weak party establishment and traditional power brokers.[203]: 27–28 Trump's election exacerbated internal schisms within the GOP,[203]: 18 and saw the GOP move from a center coalition of moderates and conservatives to a solidly right-wing party hostile to liberal views and any deviations from the party line.[204]
The Party has since faced intense factionalism,[205][206] and has also undergone a major decrease in the influence of its establishment conservative faction.[22][13][207][24][30] Trump's election split both the GOP and larger conservative movement into Trumpist and anti-Trump factions.[208][209]
These factions are particularly apparent in the
Conservatives
Ronald Reagan's presidential election in 1980 established Reagan-style American conservatism as the dominant ideological faction of the Republican Party until the election of Donald Trump in 2016.[9][22][13][23][24][26][27][28][29] Traditional modern conservatives combine support for free-market economic policies with social conservatism and a hawkish approach to foreign policy.[21] Other parts of the conservative movement are composed of fiscal conservatives and deficit hawks.[216] Conservatives generally support policies that favor limited government, individualism, traditionalism, republicanism, and limited federal governmental power in relation to the states.[217]
In foreign policy,
Long-term shifts in conservative thinking following the election of Trump have been described as a "new fusionism" of traditional conservative ideology and right-wing populist themes.[32] These have resulted in shifts towards greater support for national conservatism,[220] protectionism,[221] cultural conservatism, a more realist foreign policy, a repudiation of neoconservatism, reduced efforts to roll back entitlement programs, and a disdain for traditional checks and balances.[32][222] There are significant divisions within the party on the issues of abortion and same-sex marriage.[223][224]
Conservative caucuses include the Republican Study Committee and Freedom Caucus.[225][226]
Christian right
Since the rise of the
The Christian right is strongest in the Bible Belt, which covers most of the Southern United States.[243] Mike Pence, Donald Trump's vice president from 2017 to 2021, was a member of the Christian right.[244] In October 2023, a member of the Christian right faction, Louisiana representative Mike Johnson, was elected the 56th Speaker of the United States House of Representatives.[245][246]
Libertarians
The Republican Party has a prominent
Moderates
Moderates in the Republican Party are an ideologically centrist group that predominantly come from the
Notable moderate Republicans include Senators Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine,[261][262][263][264] Nevada governor Joe Lombardo, Vermont governor Phil Scott, former Massachusetts governor Charlie Baker, and former Maryland governor Larry Hogan.[265][266][267]
Right-wing populists
Right-wing populism is a dominant political faction of the GOP.[c] Sometimes referred to as the MAGA or "America First" movement,[276][277] Republican populists have been described as consisting of a range of right-wing ideologies including but not limited to right-wing populism,[150][278][279] national conservatism,[280] neo-nationalism,[281] and Trumpism.[269][282][283] They have been described as the American political variant of the far-right.[d] The election of Trump in 2016 split the party into pro-Trump and anti-Trump factions.[208][209]
The Republican Party's populist and far-right movements emerged in concurrence with a global increase in populist movements in the 2010s and 2020s,[202] coupled with entrenchment and increased partisanship within the party since 2010, fueled by the rise of the Tea Party movement which has also been described as far-right.[287] According to political scientists Matt Grossmann and David A. Hopkins, the Republican Party's gains among white voters without college degrees contributed to the rise of right-wing populism.[31] According to historian Gary Gerstle, Trumpism gained support in opposition to neoliberalism, including opposition to free trade, immigration, and internationalism.[28][288]
The far-right faction supports cuts to spending.[289][290] In international relations, populists support U.S. aid to Israel but not to Ukraine,[291][292] are generally supportive of improving relations with Russia,[293][294][295] and favor an isolationist "America First" foreign policy agenda.[296][297][298][223] They generally reject compromise within the party and with the Democrats,[299][300] and are willing to oust fellow Republican office holders they deem to be too moderate.[301][302] Compared to other Republicans, the populist faction is more likely to oppose legal immigration,[303] free trade,[304] neoconservatism,[305] and environmental protection laws.[306]
The party's far-right faction includes members of the Freedom Caucus,[307][308][309] as well as Marjorie Taylor Greene and Matt Gaetz.[310] Gaetz led the 2023 rebellion against then-Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy.[311][312] In the U.S. Senate, Josh Hawley has been described as a prominent figure within the populist wing of the party.[313]
Julia Azari, an associate professor of political science at Marquette University, noted that not all Trumpist Republicans are public supporters of Donald Trump, and that some Republicans endorse Trump policies while distancing themselves from Trump as a person.[314] The continued dominance of Trump within the GOP has limited the success of this strategy.[315][316] In 2024, Trump led a takeover of the Republican National Committee, installing Lara Trump as its new co-chair.[317]
Joseph Lowndes, a professor of political science at the University of Oregon, argued that while current far-right Republicans support Trump, the faction rose before and will likely exist after Trump.[318] Lilliana Mason, associate professor of political science at Johns Hopkins University, states that Donald Trump solidified the trend among Southern white conservative Democrats since the 1960s of leaving the Democratic Party and joining the Republican Party: "Trump basically worked as a lightning rod to finalize that process of creating the Republican Party as a single entity for defending the high status of white, Christian, rural Americans. It's not a huge percentage of Americans that holds these beliefs, and it's not even the entire Republican Party; it's just about half of it. But the party itself is controlled by this intolerant, very strongly pro-Trump faction."[319] According to sociologist Joe Feagin, political polarization by racially extremist Republicans as well as their increased attention from conservative media has perpetuated the near extinction of moderate Republicans and created legislative paralysis at numerous government levels in the last few decades.[320]
Political positions
This article is part of a series on |
Conservatism in the United States |
---|
Economic policies
Republicans believe that free markets and individual achievement are the primary factors behind economic prosperity.[321] Reduction in income taxes is a core component of Republicans' fiscal agenda.[322]
Taxes
Tax cuts have been at the core of Republican economic policy since 1980.
As per a 2021 study that measured Republicans' congressional votes, the modern Republican Party's economic policy positions tend to align with business interests and the affluent.[327][328][329][330][331]
Spending
Republicans frequently advocate in favor of fiscal conservatism during Democratic administrations; however, the party has a record of increasing federal debt during periods when it controls the government (the implementation of the Bush tax cuts, Medicare Part D and the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 are examples of this record).[332][333][334] Republican administrations have, since the late 1960s, sustained or increased previous levels of government spending.[335][336]
Entitlements
Republicans believe individuals should take responsibility for their own circumstances. They also believe the private sector is more effective in helping the poor through charity than the government is through welfare programs and that social assistance programs often cause government dependency.[337] As of November 2022, all 11 states that had not expanded Medicaid had Republican-controlled state legislatures.[338]
Labor unions and the minimum wage
The Republican Party is generally opposed to labor unions.
Most Republicans also oppose increases in the minimum wage, believing that such increases hurt businesses by forcing them to cut and outsource jobs while passing on costs to consumers.[342]
Trade
The Republican Party has taken widely varying views on
In the early 20th century the Republican Party began splitting on tariffs, with the great battle over the high
The Reciprocal Tariff Act of 1934 marked a sharp departure from the era of protectionism in the United States. American duties on foreign products declined from an average of 46% in 1934 to 12% by 1962, which included the presidency of Republican president Dwight D. Eisenhower.[349] After World War II, the U.S. promoted the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) established in 1947, to minimize tariffs and other restrictions, and to liberalize trade among all capitalist countries.[350][351]
During the
The 2016 election marked a return to supporting protectionism, beginning with
Trump also blocked appointments to the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization, rendering it unable to enforce and punish violators of WTO rules.[359][33] Subsequently, disregard for trade rules has increased, leading to more trade protectionist measures.[360] The Biden administration has maintained Trump's freeze on new appointments.[33] The proposed 2024 Republican Party platform was even more protectionist, calling for enacting tariffs on most imports.[34]
Environmental policies
Historically,
In 2006, then-
The Republican Party rejects
Many Republicans during the presidency of Barack Obama opposed his administration's new environmental regulations, such as those on carbon emissions from coal. In particular, many Republicans supported building the Keystone Pipeline; this position was supported by businesses, but opposed by indigenous peoples' groups and environmental activists.[378][379][380]
According to the
From 2008 to 2017, the Republican Party went from "debating how to combat human-caused climate change to arguing that it does not exist", according to The New York Times.[385] In January 2015, the Republican-led U.S. Senate voted 98–1 to pass a resolution acknowledging that "climate change is real and is not a hoax"; however, an amendment stating that "human activity significantly contributes to climate change" was supported by only five Republican senators.[386]
Health care
The party opposes a
Both Republicans and Democrats made various proposals to establish federally funded aged health insurance prior to the bipartisan effort to establish
According to a 2023 YouGov poll, Republicans are slightly more likely to oppose intersex medical alterations than Democrats.[396][397]
Foreign policy
The Republican Party has a persistent history of skepticism and opposition to multilateralism in American foreign policy.[398] Neoconservatism, which supports unilateralism and emphasizes the use of force and hawkishness in American foreign policy, has been a prominent strand of foreign policy thinking in all Republican presidential administration since Ronald Reagan's presidency.[399] Some, including paleoconservatives,[400] call for non-interventionism and an isolationist "America First" foreign policy agenda.[32][218][219] This faction gained strength starting in 2016 with the rise of Donald Trump, demanding that the United States reset its previous interventionist foreign policy and encourage allies and partners to take greater responsibility for their own defense.[401]
Israel
During the 1940s, Republicans predominantly opposed the cause of an independent Jewish state due to the influence of conservatives of the Old Right.[402] In 1948, Democratic President Harry Truman became the first world leader to recognize an independent state of Israel.[403]
The rise of neoconservatism saw the Republican Party become predominantly pro-Israel by the 1990s and 2000s,[404] although notable anti-Israel sentiment persisted through paleoconservative figures such as Pat Buchanan.[405] As president, Donald Trump generally supported Israel during most of his term, but became increasingly critical of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu towards the end of it.[406] After the 7 October 2023 Hamas terrorist attack on Israel, Trump blamed Netanyahu for having failed to prevent the attack.[407] Trump previously criticized the Israeli settlements in the West Bank and expressed doubt about whether Netanyahu truly desired peace with the Palestinians.[408] According to i24NEWS, the 2020s have seen declining support for Israel among nationalist Republicans, led by individuals such as Tucker Carlson.[409][402] Nevertheless, the 2024 Republican Party platform reaffirmed the party would "stand with Israel" and called for the deportation of "pro-Hamas radicals", while expressing a desire for peace in the Middle East.[410]
Taiwan
In the party's 2016 platform,[411] its stance on Taiwan is: "We oppose any unilateral steps by either side to alter the status quo in the Taiwan Straits on the principle that all issues regarding the island's future must be resolved peacefully, through dialogue, and be agreeable to the people of Taiwan." In addition, if "China were to violate those principles, the United States, in accord with the Taiwan Relations Act, will help Taiwan defend itself".
War on terror
Since the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, neoconservatives in the party have supported the War on Terror, including the War in Afghanistan and the Iraq War. The George W. Bush administration took the position that the Geneva Conventions do not apply to unlawful combatants, while other prominent Republicans, such as Ted Cruz, strongly oppose the use of enhanced interrogation techniques, which they view as torture.[412] In the 2020s, Trumpist Republicans such as Matt Gaetz supported reducing U.S. military presence abroad and ending intervention in countries such as Somalia.[413]
Europe, Russia and Ukraine
The 2016 Republican platform eliminated references to giving weapons to
Amid the
In April 2024, a majority of Republican members of the
Foreign relations and aid
In a 2014 poll, 59% of Republicans favored doing less abroad and focusing on the country's own problems instead.[428]
Republicans have frequently advocated for restricting foreign aid as a means of asserting the national security and immigration interests of the United States.[429][430][431]
A survey by the Chicago Council on Global Affairs shows that "Trump Republicans seem to prefer a US role that is more independent, less cooperative, and more inclined to use military force to deal with the threats they see as the most pressing".[432]
Social issues
The Republican Party is generally associated with
Abortion and embryonic stem cell research
The Republican position on abortion has changed significantly over time.[228][438] During the 1960s and early 1970s, opposition to abortion was concentrated among members of the political left and the Democratic Party; most liberal Catholics — which tended to vote for the Democratic Party — opposed expanding abortion access while most conservative evangelical Protestants supported it.[438]
During this period, Republicans generally favored legalized abortion more than Democrats,[439][440] although significant heterogeneity could be found within both parties.[441] Leading Republican political figures, including Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, Ronald Reagan, and George H. W. Bush, took pro-choice positions until the early 1980s.[439] However, starting at this point, both George H.W. Bush and Ronald Reagan described themselves as pro-life during their presidencies.
In the 21st century, both George W. Bush[442] and Donald Trump described themselves as "pro-life" during their terms. However, Trump stated that he supported the legality and ethics of abortion before his candidacy in 2015.[443]
Summarizing the rapid shift in the Republican and Democratic positions on abortion, Sue Halpern writes:
Today, opinion polls show that Republican voters are heavily divided on the legality of abortion,
Until its dissolution in 2018, Republican Majority for Choice, an abortion rights PAC, advocated for amending the GOP platform to include pro-abortion rights members.[453]
The Republican Party has pursued policies at the national and state-level to restrict embryonic stem cell research beyond the original lines because it involves the destruction of human embryos.[454][455]
After the overturning of Roe v. Wade in 2022, a majority of Republican-controlled states passed near-total bans on abortion, rendering it largely illegal throughout much of the United States.[456][457]
Affirmative action
Republicans generally oppose
The 2012 Republican national platform stated, "We support efforts to help low-income individuals get a fair chance based on their potential and individual merit; but we reject preferences, quotas, and set-asides, as the best or sole methods through which fairness can be achieved, whether in government, education or corporate boardrooms…Merit, ability, aptitude, and results should be the factors that determine advancement in our society."[459][460][461][462]
Gun ownership
Republicans generally support gun ownership rights and oppose laws regulating guns. According to a 2023 Pew Research Center poll, 45% of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents personally own firearms, compared to 32% for the general public and 20% of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents.[464]
The
In contrast, George H. W. Bush, formerly a lifelong NRA member, was highly critical of the organization following their response to the Oklahoma City bombing authored by CEO Wayne LaPierre, and publicly resigned in protest.[469]
Drug legalization
Republican elected officials have historically supported the
Opposition to the legalization of marijuana has softened significantly over time among Republican voters.[473][474] A 2021 Quinnipiac poll found that 62% of Republicans supported the legalization of recreational marijuana use and that net support for the position was +30 points.[470] Some Republican-controlled states have legalized medical and recreational marijuana in recent years.[475]
Immigration
The Republican Party has taken widely varying views on immigration throughout its history.[9] In the period between 1850 and 1870, the Republican Party was more opposed to immigration than the Democrats. The GOP's opposition was, in part, caused by its reliance on the support of anti-Catholic and anti-immigrant parties such as the Know-Nothings. In the decades following the Civil War, the Republican Party grew more supportive of immigration, as it represented manufacturers in the northeast (who wanted additional labor); during this period, the Democratic Party came to be seen as the party of labor (which wanted fewer laborers with which to compete). Starting in the 1970s, the parties switched places again, as the Democrats grew more supportive of immigration than Republicans.[476]
In 2006, the Republican-led Senate passed
In 2016, Donald Trump proposed to build a wall along the southern border of the United States. Trump immigration policies during his administration included a travel ban from multiple Muslim-majority countries, a Remain in Mexico policy for asylum-seekers, a controversial family separation policy, and attempting to end DACA.[303][482] During the tenure of Democratic President Joe Biden, the Republican Party has continued to take a hardline stance against illegal immigration. The Party largely opposes immigration reform,[483] although there are widely differing views on immigration within the Party.[480] The Party's proposed 2024 platform was opposed to immigration, and called for the mass deportation of all illegal immigrants in the United States.[34]
LGBT issues
Similar to the Democratic Party, the Republican position on LGBT rights has changed significantly over time, with continuously increasing support among both parties on the issue.[484][485] The Log Cabin Republicans is a group within the Republican Party that represents LGBT conservatives and allies and advocates for LGBT rights.[486][487]
From the early-2000s to the mid-2010s, Republicans opposed same-sex marriage, while being divided on the issue of civil unions and domestic partnerships for same-sex couples.[488] During the 2004 election, George W. Bush campaigned prominently on a constitutional amendment to prohibit same-sex marriage; many believe it helped Bush win re-election.[489][490] In both 2004[491] and 2006,[492] President Bush, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, and House Majority Leader John Boehner promoted the Federal Marriage Amendment, a proposed constitutional amendment which would legally restrict the definition of marriage to heterosexual couples.[493][494][495] In both attempts, the amendment failed to secure enough votes to invoke cloture and thus ultimately was never passed. As more states legalized same-sex marriage in the 2010s, Republicans increasingly supported allowing each state to decide its own marriage policy.[496] As of 2014, most state GOP platforms expressed opposition to same-sex marriage.[497] The 2016 GOP Platform defined marriage as "natural marriage, the union of one man and one woman," and condemned the Supreme Court's ruling legalizing same-sex marriages.[498][499] The 2020 platform, which reused the 2016 platform, retained the statements against same-sex marriage.[500][501][502]
Following his election as president in 2016, Donald Trump stated that he had no objection to same-sex marriage or to the Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, but had previously promised to consider appointing a Supreme Court justice to roll back the constitutional right.
The Republican Party platform previously opposed the
On November 6, 2021, RNC Chair Ronna McDaniel announced the creation of the "RNC Pride Coalition", in partnership with the Log Cabin Republicans, to promote outreach to LGBTQ voters.[516] However, after the announcement, McDaniel apologized for not having communicated the announcement in advance and emphasized that the new outreach program did not alter the 2016 GOP Platform.[517]
As of 2023, a majority of Republican voters support same-sex marriage.[484][518][519] According to FiveThirtyEight, as of 2022, Republican voters are consistently more open to same-sex marriage than their representatives.[520][521] The party platform approved at the 2024 Republican National Convention removed opposition to same-sex marriage, though it did oppose transgender rights and teaching about LGBT topics in schools.[34]
Voting rights
Virtually all restrictions on voting have in recent years been implemented by Republicans. Republicans, mainly at the state level, argue that the restrictions (such as the purging of
In defending their restrictions to voting rights, Republicans have made false and exaggerated claims about the extent of voter fraud in the United States; all existing research indicates that it is extremely rare,[525][526][527][528] and civil and voting rights organizations often accuse Republicans of enacting restrictions to influence elections in the party's favor. Many laws or regulations restricting voting enacted by Republicans have been successfully challenged in court, with court rulings striking down such regulations and accusing Republicans of establishing them with partisan purpose.[527][528]
After the Supreme Court decision in Shelby County v. Holder rolled back aspects of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, Republicans introduced cuts to early voting, purges of voter rolls and imposition of strict voter ID laws.[529] The 2016 Republican platform advocated proof of citizenship as a prerequisite for registering to vote and photo ID as a prerequisite when voting.[530]
After Donald Trump and his
Supporters of the bills argue they would improve election security and reverse temporary changes enacted during the COVID-19 pandemic; they point to false claims of significant election fraud, as well as the substantial public distrust of the integrity of the 2020 election those claims have fostered,[f] as justification.[542][543][544] Political analysts say that the efforts amount to voter suppression, are intended to advantage Republicans by reducing the number of people who vote, and would disproportionately affect minority voters.[545][546][547][548]
Composition
According to a 2015
In 2016, The New York Times stated that the party was strongest in the
As of the 2020s, the party derives its strongest support from rural voters, evangelical Christians and Latter-day Saints, men, senior citizens, and white voters without college degrees.[551][552][553][554] The party has made significant gains among the white working class, Hispanics, and Orthodox Jews, but has lost support among upper middle class and college-educated whites.[555][556]
Demographics
Gender
Since 1980, a "gender gap" has seen stronger support for the Republican Party among men than among women. Unmarried and divorced women were far more likely to vote for Democrat John Kerry than for Republican George W. Bush in the 2004 presidential election.[557] In 2006 House races, 43% of women voted Republican while 47% of men did so.[558] In the 2010 midterms, the "gender gap" was reduced, with women supporting Republican and Democratic candidates equally (49%–49%).[559][560] Exit polls from the 2012 elections revealed a continued weakness among unmarried women for the GOP, a large and growing portion of the electorate.[561] Although women supported Obama over Mitt Romney by a margin of 55–44% in 2012, Romney prevailed amongst married women, 53–46%.[562] Obama won unmarried women 67–31%.[563]
However, according to a December 2019 study, "White women are the only group of female voters who support Republican Party candidates for president. They have done so by a majority in all but 2 of the last 18 elections".[564][565]
Education
The Republican Party has steadily increased the percentage of votes it receives from white voters without college degrees since the 1970s, even as the educational attainment of the United States has steadily increased.[31] Since the 2010s, a similar trend in the opposite direction has been seen among white voters with college degrees, who have been increasingly voting for the Democratic Party.[566][567] White voters without college degrees tend to be more socially conservative and more likely to live in rural areas.[568] In the 2020 United States presidential election, Donald Trump won 67% of white voters without a college degree, compared to 48% of white voters with a college degree.[569][566][567]
In 2012, the Pew Research Center conducted a study of registered voters with a 35–28 Democrat-to-Republican gap. They found that self-described Democrats had an eight-point advantage over Republicans among college graduates and a fourteen-point advantage among all post-graduates polled. Republicans had an eleven-point advantage among White men with college degrees; Democrats had a ten-point advantage among women with degrees. Democrats accounted for 36% of all respondents with an education of high school or less; Republicans accounted for 28%. When isolating just White registered voters polled, Republicans had a six-point advantage overall and a nine-point advantage among those with a high school education or less.[570] Following the 2016 presidential election, exit polls indicated that "Donald Trump attracted a large share of the vote from Whites without a college degree, receiving 72 percent of the White non-college male vote and 62 percent of the White non-college female vote." Overall, 52% of voters with college degrees voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016, while 52% of voters without college degrees voted for Trump.[571]
Ethnicity
Republicans have been winning under 15% of the African American vote in national elections since 1980. The party abolished chattel slavery under
In the 2010 elections, two African American Republicans,
Republicans have gained support among racial and ethnic minorities, particularly among those who are working class, Hispanic or Latino, or Asian American since the 2010s.[582][583][584][585][586][587] According to John Avlon, in 2013, the Republican party was more ethnically diverse at the statewide elected official level than the Democratic Party was; GOP statewide elected officials included Latino Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval and African-American U.S. senator Tim Scott of South Carolina.[588]
In the 2008 presidential election, Republican presidential candidate John McCain won 55% of White votes, 35% of Asian votes, 31% of Hispanic votes and 4% of African American votes.[589] In 2012, 88% of Romney voters were White while 56% of Obama voters were White.[590] In the 2022 U.S. House elections, Republicans won 58% of White voters, 40% of Asian voters, 39% of Hispanic voters, and 13% of African American voters.[591]
As of 2020, Republican candidates had lost the popular vote in seven out of the last eight presidential elections.[592] Since 1992, the only time they won the popular vote in a presidential election is the 2004 United States presidential election. Demographers have pointed to the steady decline of its core base of older, rural White voters (as a percentage of the eligible voters).[593][594][595][596] However, Donald Trump managed to increase non-White support to 26% of his total votes in the 2020 election — the highest percentage for a GOP presidential candidate since 1960.[597][598]
Religious communities
Religion has always played a major role for both parties, but in the course of a century, the parties' religious compositions have changed. Religion was a major dividing line between the parties before
Members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, who reside predominantly in Utah and several neighboring states, voted 75% or more for George W. Bush in 2000.[600] Members of the Mormon faith had a mixed relationship with Donald Trump during his tenure, despite 67% of them voting for him in 2016 and 56% of them supporting his presidency in 2018, disapproving of his personal behavior such as that shown during the Access Hollywood controversy.[601] In the 2020 United States presidential election, Trump underperformed in heavily-Mormon Utah by a margin of more than 20% compared to Mitt Romney (who is Mormon) in 2012 and George W. Bush in 2004. Their opinion on Trump had not affected their party affiliation, however, as 76% of Mormons in 2018 expressed preference for generic Republican congressional candidates.[602]
Jews continue to vote 70–80% Democratic; however, a slim majority of Orthodox Jews voted for the Republican Party in 2016, following years of growing Orthodox Jewish support for the party due to its social conservatism and increasingly pro-Israel foreign policy stance.[603] Over 70% of Orthodox Jews identify as Republican or Republican leaning as of 2021.[604] An exit poll conducted by the Associated Press for 2020 found 35% of Muslims voted for Donald Trump.[605] The mainline traditional Protestants (Methodists, Lutherans, Presbyterians, Episcopalians and Disciples) have dropped to about 55% Republican (in contrast to 75% before 1968). Democrats have close links with the African American churches, especially the National Baptists, while their historic dominance among Catholic voters has eroded to 54–46 in the 2010 midterms.[606]
Although once strongly Democratic, American Catholic voters have been politically divided in the 21st century with 52% of Catholic voters voting for Trump in 2016 and 52% voting for Biden in 2020. While Catholic Republican leaders try to stay in line with the teachings of the Catholic Church on subjects such as abortion, contraception, euthanasia, and embryonic stem cell research, they tend to differ on the death penalty and same-sex marriage.[607] Pope Francis' 2015 encyclical Laudato si' sparked a discussion on the positions of Catholic Republicans in relation to the positions of the Church. The Pope's encyclical on behalf of the Catholic Church officially acknowledges a man-made climate change caused by burning fossil fuels.[608] The Pope says the warming of the planet is rooted in a throwaway culture and the developed world's indifference to the destruction of the planet in pursuit of short-term economic gains. According to The New York Times, Laudato si' put pressure on the Catholic candidates in the 2016 election: Jeb Bush, Bobby Jindal, Marco Rubio and Rick Santorum.[609]
With leading Democrats praising the encyclical, James Bretzke, a professor of moral theology at Boston College, has said that both sides were being disingenuous: "I think it shows that both the Republicans and the Democrats ... like to use religious authority and, in this case, the Pope to support positions they have arrived at independently ... There is a certain insincerity, hypocrisy I think, on both sides".[610] While a Pew Research poll indicates Catholics are more likely to believe the Earth is warming than non-Catholics, 51% of Catholic Republicans believe in global warming (less than the general population) and only 24% of Catholic Republicans believe global warming is caused by human activity.[611]
Members of the business community
The Republican Party has traditionally been a pro-business party. It garners major support from a wide variety of industries from the financial sector to small
A survey cited by The Washington Post in 2012 found that 61 percent of small business owners planned to vote for Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney in the 2012 presidential election. Small business became a major theme of the 2012 Republican National Convention.[618]
Republican presidents
As of 2021, there have been a total of 19 Republican presidents.
Recent electoral history
In congressional elections: 1950–present
House Election year | No. of overall House seats won |
+/– | Presidency | No. of overall Senate seats won |
+/–[i] | Senate Election year |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1950 | 199 / 435
|
28 | Harry S. Truman | 47 / 96
|
5 | 1950 |
1952 | 221 / 435
|
22 | Dwight D. Eisenhower | 49 / 96
|
2 | 1952 |
1954 | 203 / 435
|
18 | 47 / 96
|
2 | 1954 | |
1956 | 201 / 435
|
2 | 47 / 96
|
0 | 1956 | |
1958 | 153 / 435
|
48 | 34 / 98
|
13 | 1958 | |
1960 | 175 / 437
|
22 | John F. Kennedy | 35 / 100
|
1 | 1960 |
1962 | 176 / 435
|
1 | 34 / 100
|
3 | 1962 | |
1964 | 140 / 435
|
36 | Lyndon B. Johnson | 32 / 100
|
2 | 1964 |
1966 | 187 / 435
|
47 | 38 / 100
|
3 | 1966 | |
1968 | 192 / 435
|
5 | Richard Nixon | 42 / 100
|
5 | 1968 |
1970 | 180 / 435
|
12 | 44 / 100
|
2 | 1970 | |
1972 | 192 / 435
|
12 | 41 / 100
|
2 | 1972 | |
1974 | 144 / 435
|
48 | Gerald Ford | 38 / 100
|
3 | 1974 |
1976 | 143 / 435
|
1 | Jimmy Carter | 38 / 100
|
1 | 1976 |
1978 | 158 / 435
|
15 | 41 / 100
|
3 | 1978 | |
1980 | 192 / 435
|
34 | Ronald Reagan | 53 / 100
|
12 | 1980 |
1982 | 166 / 435
|
26 | 54 / 100
|
0 | 1982 | |
1984 | 182 / 435
|
16 | 53 / 100
|
2 | 1984 | |
1986 | 177 / 435
|
5 | 45 / 100
|
8 | 1986 | |
1988 | 175 / 435
|
2 | George H. W. Bush | 45 / 100
|
1 | 1988 |
1990 | 167 / 435
|
8 | 44 / 100
|
1 | 1990 | |
1992 | 176 / 435
|
9 | Bill Clinton | 43 / 100
|
0 | 1992 |
1994 | 230 / 435
|
54 | 53 / 100
|
8 | 1994 | |
1996 | 227 / 435
|
3 | 55 / 100
|
2 | 1996 | |
1998 | 223 / 435
|
4 | 55 / 100
|
0 | 1998 | |
2000 | 221 / 435
|
2 | George W. Bush | 50 / 100
|
4 | 2000[j] |
2002 | 229 / 435
|
8 | 51 / 100
|
2 | 2002 | |
2004 | 232 / 435
|
3 | 55 / 100
|
4 | 2004 | |
2006 | 202 / 435
|
30 | 49 / 100
|
6 | 2006 | |
2008 | 178 / 435
|
21 | Barack Obama | 41 / 100
|
8 | 2008 |
2010 | 242 / 435
|
63 | 47 / 100
|
6 | 2010 | |
2012 | 234 / 435
|
8 | 45 / 100
|
2 | 2012 | |
2014 | 247 / 435
|
13 | 54 / 100
|
9 | 2014 | |
2016 | 241 / 435
|
6 | Donald Trump | 52 / 100
|
2 | 2016 |
2018 | 200 / 435
|
41 | 53 / 100
|
1 | 2018 | |
2020 | 213 / 435
|
13 | Joe Biden | 50 / 100
|
3 | 2020[k] |
2022 | 222 / 435
|
9 | 49 / 100
|
1 | 2022 |
In presidential elections: 1856–present
Election | Presidential ticket | Votes | Vote % | Electoral votes | +/– | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1856 | John C. Frémont/William L. Dayton | 1,342,345 | 33.1 | 114 / 296
|
New party | Lost |
1860 | Abraham Lincoln/Hannibal Hamlin | 1,865,908 | 39.8 | 180 / 303
|
66 | Won |
1864 | Abraham Lincoln/Andrew Johnson | 2,218,388 | 55.0 | 212 / 233
|
32 | Won |
1868 | Ulysses S. Grant/Schuyler Colfax | 3,013,421 | 52.7 | 214 / 294
|
2 | Won |
1872 | Ulysses S. Grant/Henry Wilson | 3,598,235 | 55.6 | 286 / 352
|
72 | Won |
1876 | Rutherford B. Hayes/William A. Wheeler | 4,034,311 | 47.9 | 185 / 369
|
134 | Won[A] |
1880 | James A. Garfield/Chester A. Arthur | 4,446,158 | 48.3 | 214 / 369
|
29 | Won |
1884 | James G. Blaine/John A. Logan | 4,856,905 | 48.3 | 182 / 401
|
32 | Lost |
1888 | Benjamin Harrison/Levi P. Morton | 5,443,892 | 47.8 | 233 / 401
|
51 | Won[B] |
1892 | Benjamin Harrison/Whitelaw Reid | 5,176,108 | 43.0 | 145 / 444
|
88 | Lost |
1896 | William McKinley/Garret Hobart | 7,111,607 | 51.0 | 271 / 447
|
126 | Won |
1900 | William McKinley/Theodore Roosevelt | 7,228,864 | 51.6 | 292 / 447
|
21 | Won |
1904 | Theodore Roosevelt/Charles W. Fairbanks | 7,630,457 | 56.4 | 336 / 476
|
44 | Won |
1908 | William Howard Taft/James S. Sherman | 7,678,395 | 51.6 | 321 / 483
|
15 | Won |
1912 | Nicholas M. Butler[l]
|
3,486,242 | 23.2 | 8 / 531
|
313 | Lost[C] |
1916 | Charles E. Hughes/Charles W. Fairbanks | 8,548,728 | 46.1 | 254 / 531
|
246 | Lost |
1920 | Warren G. Harding/Calvin Coolidge | 16,144,093 | 60.3 | 404 / 531
|
150 | Won |
1924 | Calvin Coolidge/Charles G. Dawes | 15,723,789 | 54.0 | 382 / 531
|
22 | Won |
1928 | Herbert Hoover/Charles Curtis | 21,427,123 | 58.2 | 444 / 531
|
62 | Won |
1932 | Herbert Hoover/Charles Curtis | 15,761,254 | 39.7 | 59 / 531
|
385 | Lost |
1936 | Alf Landon/Frank Knox | 16,679,543 | 36.5 | 8 / 531
|
51 | Lost |
1940 | Wendell Willkie/Charles L. McNary | 22,347,744 | 44.8 | 82 / 531
|
74 | Lost |
1944 | Thomas E. Dewey/John W. Bricker | 22,017,929 | 45.9 | 99 / 531
|
17 | Lost |
1948 | Thomas E. Dewey/Earl Warren | 21,991,292 | 45.1 | 189 / 531
|
90 | Lost |
1952 | Dwight D. Eisenhower/Richard Nixon | 34,075,529 | 55.2 | 442 / 531
|
253 | Won |
1956 | Dwight D. Eisenhower/Richard Nixon | 35,579,180 | 57.4 | 457 / 531
|
15 | Won |
1960 | Richard Nixon/Henry Cabot Lodge Jr. | 34,108,157 | 49.6 | 219 / 537
|
238 | Lost |
1964 | Barry Goldwater/William E. Miller | 27,175,754 | 38.5 | 52 / 538
|
167 | Lost |
1968 | Richard Nixon/Spiro Agnew | 31,783,783 | 43.4 | 301 / 538
|
249 | Won |
1972 | Richard Nixon/Spiro Agnew | 47,168,710 | 60.7 | 520 / 538
|
219 | Won |
1976 | Gerald Ford/Bob Dole | 38,148,634 | 48.0 | 240 / 538
|
280 | Lost |
1980 | Ronald Reagan/George H. W. Bush | 43,903,230 | 50.7 | 489 / 538
|
249 | Won |
1984 | Ronald Reagan/George H. W. Bush | 54,455,472 | 58.8 | 525 / 538
|
36 | Won |
1988 | George H. W. Bush/Dan Quayle | 48,886,097 | 53.4 | 426 / 538
|
99 | Won |
1992 | George H. W. Bush/Dan Quayle | 39,104,550 | 37.4 | 168 / 538
|
258 | Lost |
1996 | Bob Dole/Jack Kemp | 39,197,469 | 40.7 | 159 / 538
|
9 | Lost |
2000 | George W. Bush/Dick Cheney | 50,456,002 | 47.9 | 271 / 538
|
112 | Won[D] |
2004 | George W. Bush/Dick Cheney | 62,040,610 | 50.7 | 286 / 538
|
15 | Won |
2008 | John McCain/Sarah Palin | 59,948,323 | 45.7 | 173 / 538
|
113 | Lost |
2012 | Mitt Romney/Paul Ryan | 60,933,504 | 47.2 | 206 / 538
|
33 | Lost |
2016 | Donald Trump/Mike Pence | 62,984,828 | 46.1 | 304 / 538
|
98 | Won[E] |
2020 | Donald Trump/Mike Pence | 74,223,975 | 46.8 | 232 / 538
|
72 | Lost |
See also
Notes
- ^ Attributed to the following sources.[9][22][13][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]
- ^ Attributed to multiple references.[229][230][231][232][233][234][235][236][237][238][239][240]
- ^ Attributed to multiple sources.[9][22][13][23][24][26][269][270][271][272][273][274][275]
- ^ Attributed to the following sources.[284][285][286][272][273][274][275]
- ^ Right-to-work laws ban union security agreements, which require all workers in a unionized workplace to pay dues or a fair-share fee regardless of whether they are members of the union or not.[341]
- ^ According to an NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist poll, while more than 60% of Americans believe the 2020 election was secure, a large majority of Republican voters say they do not trust the results of the 2020 election.[540] According to a poll by Quinnipiac, 77% of Republicans believe there was widespread voter fraud.[541]
- ^ a b c d Died in office.
- ^ Resigned from office.
- ^ Comparing seats held immediately preceding and following the general election.
- ^ Republican Vice President Dick Cheney provided a tie-breaking vote, initially giving Republicans a majority from Inauguration Day until Jim Jeffords left the Republican Party to caucus with the Democrats on June 6, 2001.
- 117th Congress.
- ^ Incumbent vice-president James S. Sherman was re-nominated as Taft's running-mate, but died six days prior to the election. Butler was chosen to receive the Republican vice-presidential votes after the election.
- ^ Although Hayes won a majority of votes in the Electoral College, Democrat Samuel J. Tilden won a majority of the popular vote.
- ^ Although Harrison won a majority of votes in the Electoral College, Democrat Grover Cleveland won a plurality of the popular vote.
- Progressive Theodore Roosevelt.
- ^ Although Bush won a majority of votes in the Electoral College, Democrat Al Gore won a plurality of the popular vote.
- ^ Although Trump won a majority of votes in the Electoral College, Democrat Hillary Clinton won a plurality of the popular vote.
References
- ^ The Origin of the Republican Party by Prof. A. F. Gilman, Ripon College, WI, 1914.
- ^ Widmer, Ted (March 19, 2011). "A Very Mad-Man". Opinionator. The New York Times. Retrieved March 12, 2017.
- ^ "Political Parties | Northern Illinois University Digital Library". digital.lib.niu.edu. Retrieved May 27, 2024.
- ISSN 1945-7987.
- ^ "Historical Context: The Breakdown of the Party System | Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History". www.gilderlehrman.org. Retrieved May 27, 2024.
- ^ "Major American Political Parties of the 19th Century". Norwich University Resource Library. Retrieved May 28, 2024.
- ISBN 978-0-19-974390-2.
- ISBN 0-07045837-5) p. 94.
- ^ S2CID 233401184. Retrieved September 21, 2022.
- ^ Morgan, David (August 21, 2023). "Republican feud over 'root canal' spending cuts raises US government shutdown risk". Reuters. Retrieved May 13, 2024.
- ^
- Baker, Paula; Critchlow, Donald T., eds. (2020). "Chapter 15: Religion and American Politics". The Oxford Handbook of American Political History. New York, New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 278–294. ISBN 9780199341788.
- Lewis, Andrew R. (August 28, 2019). "The Inclusion-Moderation Thesis: The U.S. Republican Party and the Christian Right". Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-022863-7.
Considering all the evidence, the most apt description is that conservative Christianity has transformed the Republican Party, and the Republican Party has transformed conservative Christianity ... With its inclusion in the Republican Party, the Christian right has moderated on some aspects ... At the same time, the Christian right has altered Republican politics.
- Perry, Samuel L. (2022). "American Religion in the Era of Increasing Polarization". ISSN 0360-0572. p. 91:
Unaffiliated Americans were not abandoning orthodox beliefs, but rather, the increase in "no religion" was confined to political moderates and liberals who were likely reacting to the growing alignment of Christian identity with the religious Right and Republicans.
3 - Berlet, Chip; Hardisty, Berlet, eds. (2019). "Drifting Right and going wrong: An overview of the US political Right". Trumping Democracy: From Reagan to the Alt-right (1 ed.). London: Routledge. p. 91. ISBN 9781315438412.
Within the Republican Party, the Christian Right competes with more secular, upstart free market libertarianism and button-down business conservatism for dominance.
- Gannon, Thomas M. (July–September 1981). "The New Christian Right in America as a Social and Political Force". JSTOR 30125411.
- Ben Barka, Mokhtar (December 2012). "The New Christian Right's relations with Israel and with the American Jews: the mid-1970s onward". E-Rea. 10 (1). S2CID 191364375.
- Palmer, Randall; Winner, Lauren F. (2005) [2002]. "Protestants and Homosexuality". Protestantism in America. Columbia Contemporary American Religion Series. LCCN 2002023859.
- "Content Pages of the Encyclopedia of Religion and Social Science". Archived from the original on March 3, 2016.
- Trollinger, William (October 8, 2019). "Fundamentalism turns 100, a landmark for the Christian Right". from the original on May 7, 2022. Retrieved July 3, 2022.
The emergent Christian Right attached itself to the Republican Party, which was more aligned with its members' central commitments than the Democrats ... By the time Falwell died, in 2007, the Christian Right had become the most important constituency in the Republican Party. It played a crucial role in electing Donald Trump in 2016.
- Thomson-DeVeaux, Amelia (October 27, 2022). "How Much Power Do Christians Really Have?". FiveThirtyEight. Archived from the original on April 10, 2024. Retrieved June 16, 2024.
In the 1980s and 1990s, as white Christian conservatives forged an alliance with the Republican Party, Christianity itself started to become a partisan symbol. Identifying as a Christian was no longer just about theology, community or family history — to many Americans, the label became uncomfortably tangled with the Christian Right's political agenda, which was itself becoming increasingly hard to separate from the GOP's political agenda.
- Baker, Paula; Critchlow, Donald T., eds. (2020). "Chapter 15: Religion and American Politics". The Oxford Handbook of American Political History. New York, New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 278–294.
- ^ ISBN 978-1-4129-8876-6.
While right-libertarianism has been equated with libertarianism in general in the United States, left-libertarianism has become a more predominant aspect of politics in western European democracies over the past three decades. ... Since the 1950s, libertarianism in the United States has been associated almost exclusively with right-libertarianism ... As such, right-libertarianism in the United States remains a fruitful discourse with which to articulate conservative claims, even as it lacks political efficacy as a separate ideology. However, even without its own movement, libertarian sensibility informs numerous social movements in the United States, including the U.S. patriot movement, the gun-rights movement, and the incipient Tea Party movement.
- ^ ISSN 1940-1582.
In this article, we first illustrate that the Republican Party, or at least the dominant wing, which supports or tolerates Donald Trump and his Make America Great Again (MAGA) agenda have become a proto-typical populist radical right-wing party (PRRP).
- ^
Sources for center-right:
- Gidron, Norm; Zilbatt, Daniel (2019). "Center-Right Political Parties in Advanced Democracies" (PDF). ISSN 1094-2939. Retrieved June 17, 2024.
- Keckler, Charles; Rozell, Mark J. (April 3, 2015). "The Libertarian Right and the Religious Right". .
To better understand the structure of cooperation and competition between these groups, we construct an anatomy of the American center-right, which identifies them as incipient factions within the conservative movement and its political instrument, the Republican Party.
- Donovan, Todd (October 2, 2019). "Authoritarian attitudes and support for radical right populists". .
A strict two-party system, such as the United States, does not fit the tripolar logic. If authoritarian attitudes exist in an electorate that effectively has no potential for anything but a choice between one centre-left and one centre-right party, people with such attitudes may find a place in one of the two dominant parties.
- Carter, Neil; Keith, Daniel; Vasilopoulou, Sofia; Sindre, Gyda M. (March 8, 2023). The Routledge Handbook of Political Parties. p. 140. ISBN 978-0-429-26385-9.
A primary driver of comparisons between the USA and other Anglosphere centre-right parties appears to be cultural and language affinities.
- Gidron, Norm; Zilbatt, Daniel (2019). "Center-Right Political Parties in Advanced Democracies" (PDF).
- ^ Sources for right-wing:
- McKay, David (2020), Crewe, Ivor; Sanders, David (eds.), "Facilitating Donald Trump: Populism, the Republican Party and Media Manipulation", Authoritarian Populism and Liberal Democracy, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 107–121, ISBN 978-3-030-17997-7, retrieved June 13, 2024,
the Republicans changed from being a right of centre coalition of moderates and conservatives to an unambiguously right-wing party that was hostile not only to liberal views but also to any perspective that clashed with the core views of an ideologically cohesive conservative cadre of party faithfuls
- Greenberg, David (January 27, 2021). "An Intellectual History of Trumpism". POLITICO Magazine. Retrieved June 13, 2024.
The larger ideology that the president-elect represents is a post-Iraq War, post-crash, post-Barack Obama update of what used to be called paleoconservatism: On race and immigration, where the alt-right affinities are most pronounced, its populist ideas are carrying an already right-wing party even further right.
- Wineinger, Catherine; Nugent, Mary K. (January 2, 2020). "Framing Identity Politics: Right-Wing Women as Strategic Party Actors in the UK and US". Journal of Women, Politics & Policy. 41 (1): 5. ISSN 1554-477X.
- Jessoula, Matteo; Natili, Marcello; Pavolini, Emmanuele (August 8, 2022). "'Exclusionary welfarism': a new programmatic agenda for populist right-wing parties?". Contemporary Politics. 28 (4): 447–449. ISSN 1356-9775.
- McKay, David (2020), Crewe, Ivor; Sanders, David (eds.), "Facilitating Donald Trump: Populism, the Republican Party and Media Manipulation", Authoritarian Populism and Liberal Democracy, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 107–121,
- ^ "Members". IDU. Archived from the original on July 16, 2015.
- ^ "Regional Unions". International Democracy Union. Archived from the original on June 17, 2010. Retrieved August 19, 2024.
- ^ "About - ECR Party". European Conservatives and Reformists Party. August 4, 2022. Retrieved August 19, 2024.
- ^ Brownstein, Ronald (November 22, 2017). "Where the Republican Party Began". The American Prospect. Archived from the original on December 29, 2021.
- ISBN 978-0809387137. Archivedfrom the original on July 24, 2019. Retrieved February 4, 2018.
- ^ a b Devine, Donald (April 4, 2014). "Reagan's Philosophical Fusionism". The American Conservative. Archived from the original on April 4, 2023. Retrieved January 18, 2023.
- ^ ISSN 2075-4698.
- ^ a b c d Ward, Ian (August 26, 2022). "Trump Didn't Kill Reaganism. These Guys Did". Politico. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
- ^ a b c d Desiderio, Andrew; Sherman, Jake; Bresnahan, John (February 7, 2024). "The end of the Old GOP". Punchbowl News. Archived from the original on February 7, 2024. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
- ^ a b Kane, Paul (October 5, 2023). "McCarthy thought he could harness forces of disruption. Instead they devoured him". The Washington Post.
As far back as 2009, the future House speaker tried to channel the anti-politician, tea party wave building into a political force, but the movement crushed him.
- ^ a b c Kight, Stef W. (February 13, 2023). "GOP's old guard on verge of extinction as Trump allies circle Senate". Axios. Retrieved February 14, 2024.
- ^ a b Ball, Molly (July 19, 2024). "Trump Hasn't Changed, but the GOP Has". The Wall Street Journal.
- ^ ISBN 978-0197519646.
The most sweeping account of how neoliberalism came to dominate American politics for nearly a half century before crashing against the forces of Trumpism on the right and a new progressivism on the left.
- ^ a b Dawsey, Josh; Arnsdorf, Isaac; Vozzella, Laura (July 19, 2024). "Trump's overhaul of GOP shows his sway but leaves some on sidelines". The Washington Post.
- ^ a b Nagourney, Adam (July 16, 2024). "Guess Who's Not Coming to Milwaukee? Bush, Quayle, Pence, Cheney or Romney". The New York Times.
- ^ a b c Grossmann, Matt; Hopkins, David A. "Polarized by Degrees: How the Diploma Divide and the Culture War Transformed American Politics". Cambridge University Press. Retrieved May 23, 2024.
Democrats have become the home of highly-educated citizens with progressive social views who prefer credentialed experts to make policy decisions, while Republicans have become the populist champions of white voters without college degrees who increasingly distrust teachers, scientists, journalists, universities, non-profit organizations, and even corporations.
- ^ S2CID 266282896.
- ^ a b c "How Trump Could Deal Another Blow to Already Hobbled WTO". Bloomberg News. September 4, 2023.
- ^ a b c d Haberman, Maggie; Goldmacher, Shane; Swan, Jonathan (July 8, 2024). "Trump Presses G.O.P. for New Platform That Softens Stance on Abortion". The New York Times.
The platform is even more nationalistic, more protectionist and less socially conservative than the 2016 Republican platform that was duplicated in the 2020 election.
- ^ "U.S. Senate: The Kansas-Nebraska Act". www.senate.gov. Archived from the original on March 29, 2019. Retrieved March 28, 2019.
- ^ "The Wealthy Activist Who Helped Turn "Bleeding Kansas" Free". Smithsonian. Archived from the original on March 27, 2019. Retrieved March 28, 2019.
- ^ George H. Mayer, The Republican Party, 1854-1964 (1965) pp. 23–30.
- ^ "The Origin of the Republican Party, A. F. Gilman, Ripon College, 1914". Content.wisconsinhistory.org. Archived from the original on March 22, 2012. Retrieved January 17, 2012.
- ^ "History of the GOP". GOP. Archived from the original on January 29, 2018. Retrieved May 9, 2017.
- ^ "Birth of Republicanism". The New York Times. 1879. Archived from the original on May 13, 2022. Retrieved April 25, 2021.
- ISBN 978-0-87140-467-1.
- ^ William Gienapp, The Origins of the Republican Party, 1852–1856 (Oxford UP, 1987)
- ^ William Gienapp, "Nativism and the Creation of a Republican Majority in the North before the Civil War." Journal of American History 72.3 (1985): 529–59 online Archived November 24, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
- ^ "Republican National Political Conventions 1856–2008 (Library of Congress)". www.loc.gov. Archived from the original on February 20, 2019. Retrieved March 12, 2019.
- ^ History. February 9, 2010. Archivedfrom the original on March 22, 2019. Retrieved March 22, 2019.
- ^ a b Cooper, William (October 4, 2016). "James Buchanan: Campaigns and Elections". Miller Center of Public Affairs. Archived from the original on May 21, 2021. Retrieved May 31, 2021.
- ^ McPherson 1988, p. 144.
- ^ Burlingame, Michael (October 4, 2016). "Abraham Lincoln: Campaigns and Elections". Miller Center of Public Affairs. Archivedfrom the original on April 2, 2017. Retrieved May 31, 2021.
- ISBN 978-0743273206.
- ^ Kim, Mallie Jane (December 2, 2010). "The Election That Led to the Civil War". U.S. News & World Report. Archived from the original on November 8, 2020. Retrieved May 31, 2021.
- History. November 13, 2009. Archivedfrom the original on March 22, 2019. Retrieved March 22, 2019.
- ^ Klein, Christopher (September 2018). "Congress Passes 13th Amendment, 150 Years Ago". History. Archived from the original on March 30, 2019. Retrieved March 12, 2019.
- ^ Harris, William C. (1997). With Charity for All: Lincoln and the Restoration of the Union. University Press of Kentucky. pp. 123–170.
- ^ Varon, Elizabeth R. (October 4, 2016). "Andrew Johnson: Campaigns and Elections". Miller Center of Public Affairs. Archivedfrom the original on September 3, 2020. Retrieved May 31, 2021.
- from the original on January 29, 2021. Retrieved May 31, 2021.
- ^ Matthews, Dylan (July 20, 2016). "Donald Trump and Chris Christie are reportedly planning to purge the civil service". Vox. Archived from the original on March 22, 2019. Retrieved March 22, 2019.
- ^ Waugh, Joan (October 4, 2016). "Ulysses S. Grant: Campaigns and Elections". Miller Center of Public Affairs. Archived from the original on August 4, 2018. Retrieved May 31, 2021.
- ^ Frommer, Frederic (October 22, 2022). "Democrats didn't run a presidential candidate 150 years ago. It backfired". Washington Post.
- ^ "Ulysses S. Grant - Civil War, Facts & Quotes". HISTORY. March 30, 2020.
- ^ Blackford, Shelia (September 30, 2020). "Disputed Election of 1876". Miller Center of Public Affairs. Archived from the original on April 17, 2021. Retrieved May 31, 2021.
- ^ Johnston, Robert D. (October 4, 2016). "Rutherford B. Hayes: Campaigns and Elections". Miller Center of Public Affairs. Archived from the original on May 12, 2021. Retrieved May 31, 2021.
- ^ Johnston, Robert D. (October 4, 2016). "Rutherford B. Hayes: Domestic Affairs". Miller Center of Public Affairs. Archived from the original on May 10, 2021. Retrieved May 31, 2021.
- ^ Garfield, James A. (February 1876). "The Currency Conflict". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on November 17, 2020. Retrieved May 31, 2021.
- JSTOR 40255831.
- ^ Andrew Glass (January 16, 2018). "Pendleton Act inaugurates U.S. civil service system, Jan. 16, 1883". Politico. Archived from the original on November 23, 2020. Retrieved February 22, 2021.
- ^ Butler, Leslie (2009). Critical Americans: Victorian Intellectuals and Transatlantic Liberal Reform. University of North Carolina Press.
- from the original on November 8, 2020. Retrieved May 31, 2021.
- ^ Nevins, Allan (1933). Letters of Grover Cleveland, 1850–1908. p. 269.
- JSTOR 1891336.
- JSTOR 2152487.
- from the original on August 20, 2020. Retrieved May 31, 2021.
- from the original on June 1, 2021. Retrieved May 31, 2021.
- ^ ISBN 978-0805069532.
- ^ Walter Dean Burnham, "Periodization schemes and 'party systems': the 'system of 1896' as a case in point." Social Science History 10.3 (1986): 263–314.
- ISBN 978-0700617210.
- ^ "The Contentious 1896 Election That Started the Rural-Urban Voter Divide". HISTORY. August 5, 2020.
- ^ George H. Mayer, The Republican Party, 1854-1964 (1965) p. 256.
- ^ "The Ol' Switcheroo. Theodore Roosevelt, 1912". Time. April 29, 2009. Archived from the original on October 5, 2018. Retrieved February 3, 2018.
- ^ George H. Mayer, The Republican Party, 1854-1964 (1965) pp. 328-427, online
- ^ David E. Kyvig, Repealing National Prohibition (2000) pp. 63–65.
- ^ Garland S. Tucker, III, The high tide of American conservatism: Davis, Coolidge, and the 1924 election (2010) online
- ^ Robert K. Murray, The politics of normalcy: governmental theory and practice in the Harding-Coolidge era (1973) online
- ^ Lewis Gould, Grand Old Party: A History of the Republicans (2003) pp. 271–308.
- ^ a b "The Roots of Modern Conservatism | Michael Bowen". University of North Carolina Press. Archived from the original on May 22, 2017. Retrieved May 20, 2019.
- ^ Gould, pp. 271–308.
- JSTOR 2702450. Nash references David W. Reinhard, The Republican Right since 1945, (University Press of Kentucky, 1983).
- ^ Rothbard, Murray (2007). The Betrayal of the American Right (PDF). Mises Institute. p. 85. Archived (PDF) from the original on February 22, 2021. Retrieved July 21, 2019.
- ^ Nicol C. Rae, The Decline and Fall of the Liberal Republicans: From 1952 to the Present (1989)
- ^ Perlstein, Rick (August 2008). "How the 1964 Republican Convention Sparked a Revolution From the Right". Smithsonian Magazine. Archived from the original on February 20, 2021. Retrieved February 15, 2021.
- ^ F. Will, George (November 21, 2014). "George F. Will: Recalling Rockefeller". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on October 27, 2020. Retrieved February 15, 2021.
- ^ Hayward, Steven F. (October 23, 2014). "Why Ronald Reagan's 'A Time for Choosing' endures after all this time". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on December 20, 2020. Retrieved February 15, 2021.
- ISBN 978-0195317107.
- ^ Fisher, Marc (June 2017). "'Tear down this wall': How Reagan's forgotten line became a defining moment". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on November 8, 2022. Retrieved November 7, 2022.
- ^ "Looking back at the breakup of the Soviet Union 30 years ago". www.wbur.org. December 24, 2021. Archived from the original on November 4, 2023. Retrieved November 4, 2023.
- ^ Foltynova, Kristyna (October 1, 2021). "The Undoing Of The U.S.S.R.: How It Happened". rferl.org. Archived from the original on April 13, 2022. Retrieved November 4, 2023.
- ^ "It's 30 years since the collapse of the Soviet Union". euronews. December 24, 2021. Archived from the original on January 9, 2022. Retrieved November 4, 2023.
- ISBN 978-1137033499. Archivedfrom the original on April 6, 2015. Retrieved June 17, 2015.
- ^ Erickson, Amanda (December 2, 2018). "How George H.W. Bush pushed the United States to embrace free trade". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on May 16, 2021. Retrieved May 30, 2021.
- ^ "Opposed from the start, the rocky history of NAFTA". Reuters. August 16, 2017. Archived from the original on January 15, 2021. Retrieved May 30, 2021.
- ^ Collins, Eliza (July 10, 2019). "Did Perot Spoil 1992 Election for Bush? It's Complicated". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on June 9, 2021. Retrieved May 30, 2021.
- ^ Helmore, Edward (February 5, 2017). "How Trump's political playbook evolved since he first ran for president in 2000". The Guardian. Archived from the original on February 16, 2021. Retrieved May 30, 2021.
- ^ Peter Applebome (November 11, 1994). "THE 1994 ELECTIONS: THE SOUTH; The Rising G.O.P. Tide Overwhelms the Democratic Levees in the South". The New York Times. Retrieved September 22, 2014.
- ^ History. Archivedfrom the original on April 28, 2021. Retrieved May 29, 2021.
- ^ a b Elving, Ron (September 23, 2010). "GOP's 'Pledge' Echoes 'Contract'; But Much Myth Surrounds '94 Plan". NPR. Archived from the original on June 1, 2021. Retrieved May 29, 2021.
- ^ Glass, Andrew (November 8, 2007). "Congress runs into 'Republican Revolution' Nov. 8, 1994". Politico. Archived from the original on March 9, 2021. Retrieved May 29, 2021.
- ^ a b Baer, Susan (November 7, 1996). "Revolutionary Gingrich suddenly is a centrist offering to help Clinton Election showed speaker to be 'slightly more popular than Unabomber'; ELECTION 1996". The Baltimore Sun. Archived from the original on June 1, 2021. Retrieved May 29, 2021.
- Hoover Institute. Archivedfrom the original on October 19, 2020. Retrieved May 29, 2021.
- ^ Mitchell, Alison (November 7, 1998). "The Speaker Steps Down: The Career; the Fall of Gingrich, an Irony in an Odd Year". The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 19, 2020. Retrieved October 13, 2019.
- ^ Kilgore, Ed (June 6, 2019). "Did Impeachment Plans Damage Republicans in 1998?". New York. Archived from the original on March 16, 2021. Retrieved May 29, 2021.
- ^ Graham, David A.; Murphy, Cullen (December 2018). "The Clinton Impeachment, As Told By The People Who Lived It". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on April 29, 2021. Retrieved May 29, 2021.
- ^ Rothman, Lily (May 28, 2015). "How a Scandal Made Dennis Hastert the Speaker of the House". Time. Archived from the original on October 25, 2020. Retrieved May 29, 2021.
- ^ Judis, John (December 20, 2004). "Movement Interruptus". The American Prospect. Archived from the original on February 22, 2021. Retrieved December 8, 2019.
- ^ Vyse, Graham (March 30, 2018). "'Compassionate Conservatism' Won't Be Back Anytime Soon". New Republic. Archived from the original on January 16, 2021. Retrieved June 15, 2020.
- ^ Alberta, Tim (June 8, 2020). "Is This the Last Stand of the 'Law and Order' Republicans?". Politico. Archived from the original on February 12, 2021. Retrieved June 13, 2020.
- ^ Wooldridge, Adrian and John Micklethwait. The Right Nation (2004).
- ^ Wilentz, Sean (September 4, 2008). "How Bush Destroyed the Republican Party". Rolling Stone. Archived from the original on November 1, 2020. Retrieved February 15, 2021.
- ISBN 978-0812209099.
- ^ "Profiles of the Typology Groups". People-press.org. May 10, 2005. Archived from the original on January 11, 2017. Retrieved December 27, 2016.
- ^ "Righteous Anger: The Conservative Case Against George W. Bush". The American Conservative (Cato Institute Re-printing). December 11, 2003. Archived from the original on July 5, 2015. Retrieved May 2, 2015.
- Real Clear Politics. Published December 21, 2007. Retrieved August 22, 2008.
- ^ a b "Republican Party | political party, United States [1854–present]". Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on May 5, 2017. Retrieved May 9, 2017.
- ^ Dick, Jason (January 19, 2016). "Today's Senate Roadblock Is Tomorrow's Safeguard". Roll Call. Archived from the original on December 10, 2020. Retrieved December 8, 2019.
- ^ Winston, David (January 4, 2019). "House Republicans came back from being written off before. They can again". Roll Call. Archived from the original on December 8, 2019. Retrieved December 8, 2019.
- ^ Niemietz, Brian (August 29, 2018). "Sarah Palin was not invited to John McCain's funeral". New York Daily News. Archived from the original on November 9, 2020. Retrieved December 8, 2019.
- ^ Kilgore, Ed (November 3, 2010). "How the Republicans Did It". The New Republic. Archived from the original on December 20, 2020. Retrieved October 13, 2019.
- ^ "US midterm election results herald new political era as Republicans take House". The Guardian. November 3, 2010. Archived from the original on December 14, 2010. Retrieved October 13, 2019.
- ^ Connolly, Katie (September 16, 2010). "What exactly is the Tea Party?". BBC News. Archived from the original on January 27, 2021. Retrieved October 13, 2019.
- ^ "Strong in 2010, Where is the Tea Party Now?". NPR.org. Archived from the original on August 6, 2020. Retrieved October 13, 2019.
- ^ ISBN 978-0226687520. Archivedfrom the original on December 15, 2023. Retrieved May 21, 2021.
- ^ Gallup: Tea Party's top concerns are debt, size of government The Hill, July 5, 2010
- ^ Somashekhar, Sandhya (September 12, 2010). Tea Party DC March: "Tea party activists march on Capitol Hill" Archived December 14, 2022, at the Wayback Machine. The Washington Post. Retrieved November 5, 2011.
- SSRN 1853645.
- ^ Ekins, Emily (September 26, 2011). "Is Half the Tea Party Libertarian?". Reason. Archived from the original on May 11, 2012. Retrieved July 16, 2012.Kirby, David; Ekins, Emily McClintock (August 6, 2012). "Libertarian Roots of the Tea Party". Policy Analysis (705). Cato Institute. Archived from the original on December 4, 2018. Retrieved June 9, 2019.
- ^ Halloran, Liz (February 5, 2010). "What's Behind The New Populism?". NPR. Archived from the original on July 29, 2018. Retrieved June 9, 2019.Barstow, David (February 16, 2010). "Tea Party Lights Fuse for Rebellion on Right". The New York Times. Archived from the original on March 2, 2017. Retrieved June 9, 2019.Fineman, Howard (April 6, 2010). "Party Time". Newsweek. Archived from the original on July 13, 2011. Retrieved June 9, 2019.
- ^ Arrillaga, Pauline (April 14, 2014). "Tea Party 2012: A Look At The Conservative Movement's Last Three Years". HuffPost. Archived from the original on April 17, 2012. Retrieved June 9, 2019.Boorstein, Michelle (October 5, 2010). "Tea party, religious right often overlap, poll shows". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on April 7, 2019. Retrieved June 9, 2019.Wallsten, Peter; Yadron, Danny (September 29, 2010). "Tea-Party Movement Gathers Strength". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on September 13, 2018. Retrieved June 9, 2019.
- ^ "Scott Brown: the tea party's first electoral victory". Christian Science Monitor. January 19, 2010. Archived from the original on February 14, 2021. Retrieved December 8, 2019.
- ^ "Will Redistricting Be a Bloodbath for Democrats?". ABC News. Archived from the original on April 12, 2012. Retrieved April 13, 2012.
- ^ "It's official: Obama, Biden win second term". Los Angeles Times. January 4, 2013. Archived from the original on January 3, 2021. Retrieved December 8, 2019.
- ^ "Under Obama, Democrats suffer largest loss in power since Eisenhower". Quorum. Archived from the original on May 26, 2020. Retrieved December 8, 2019.
- ^ "Democrats Retain Senate Control On Election Night". HuffPost. November 7, 2012. Archived from the original on January 8, 2017. Retrieved December 8, 2019.
- ^ "Olympia Snowe: Bob Dole is right about GOP" – Kevin Robillard Archived June 5, 2013, at the Wayback Machine. Politico.Com (May 29, 2013). Retrieved on August 17, 2013.
- ^ Powell: GOP has 'a dark vein of intolerance' Archived May 20, 2013, at the Wayback Machine. Politico.Com. Retrieved on August 17, 2013.
- ^ "Grand Old Party for a Brand New Generation" (PDF). June 10, 2013. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 10, 2013.
- ^ Franke-Ruta, Garance (March 18, 2013). "What You Need to Read in the RNC Election-Autopsy Report". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on July 7, 2019. Retrieved July 5, 2019.
- ^ Rachel Weiner, "Reince Priebus gives GOP prescription for future", The Washington Post March 18, 2013 Archived July 23, 2015, at the Wayback Machine
- ^ "Republicans keep edge in latest Senate midterm estimate". CBS News. Archived from the original on September 7, 2014. Retrieved September 7, 2014.
- ^ "It's all but official: This will be the most dominant Republican Congress since 1929". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on December 13, 2017. Retrieved December 6, 2017.
- ^ "12 days that stunned a nation: How Hillary Clinton lost". NBC News. August 23, 2017. Archived from the original on January 28, 2021. Retrieved December 8, 2019.
- ^ a b "How Trump won and proved everyone wrong with his populist message". NBC News Specials. December 14, 2016. Archived from the original on November 8, 2020. Retrieved December 8, 2019.
- ^ ISSN 2075-4698.
- ^ Cohn, Nate (November 9, 2016). "Why Trump Won: Working-Class Whites". The New York Times. Archived from the original on November 9, 2016. Retrieved February 15, 2021.
- ^ Bosman, Julie; Davey, Monica (November 11, 2016). "Republicans Expand Control in a Deeply Divided Nation". The New York Times. Archived from the original on November 19, 2016. Retrieved February 18, 2017.
- ^ "2017-2018 Governors' Races: Where Power Is Most and Least Likely to Flip". Governing. January 3, 2017.
- ^ "Republicans Governorships Rise to Highest Mark Since 1922". U.S. News & World Report. Archived from the original on September 15, 2017. Retrieved September 10, 2017.
- ^ Lieb, David A. (November 6, 2016). "Republican governorships rise to highest mark since 1922". U.S. News & World Report. Associated Press.
- ^ Phillips, Amber (November 12, 2016). "These 3 maps show just how dominant Republicans are in America after Tuesday". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on November 13, 2016. Retrieved November 14, 2016.
- ^ Lieb, David A. (December 29, 2016). "GOP-Controlled States Aim to Reshape Laws". Associated Press. Archived from the original on December 31, 2016. Retrieved December 30, 2016.
- ^ Greenblatt, Alan (November 9, 2016). "Republicans Add to Their Dominance of State Legislatures". Governing. Archived from the original on November 16, 2016. Retrieved November 17, 2016.
- ^ Graham, David A. (November 7, 2018). "The Democrats Are Back, and Ready to Take On Trump". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on December 9, 2019. Retrieved November 17, 2020.
- ^ Kumar, Anita (September 26, 2020). "Trump's legacy is now the Supreme Court". Politico. Archived from the original on February 16, 2021. Retrieved November 17, 2020.
- ^ "Trump signs tax cut bill, first big legislative win". NBC News. December 22, 2017. Archived from the original on February 8, 2021. Retrieved April 1, 2021.
- ^ Leonard, David (December 21, 2019). "Trump Officially Establishes US Space Force with 2020 Defense Bill Signing". Space.com. Archived from the original on June 3, 2023.
- ^ Forgey, Quint (September 15, 2020). "'The dawn of a new Middle East': Trump celebrates Abraham Accords with White House signing ceremony". Politico. Archived from the original on February 26, 2021. Retrieved April 1, 2021.
- ^ Wilkie, Christina; Breuninger, Kevin (February 5, 2020). "Trump acquitted of both charges in Senate impeachment trial". CNBC.
- ^ Chappell, Bill (January 13, 2021). "House Impeaches Trump A 2nd Time, Citing Insurrection At U.S. Capitol". NPR. Archived from the original on February 20, 2021. Retrieved February 14, 2021.
- ^ Fandos, Nicholas (January 13, 2021). "Trump Impeached for Inciting Insurrection". The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 28, 2021. Retrieved February 14, 2021.
- ^ Gregorian, Dareh (February 13, 2021). "Trump acquitted in impeachment trial; 7 GOP Senators vote with Democrats to convict". NBC News. Archived from the original on February 13, 2021. Retrieved February 14, 2021.
- ^ Riccardi, Nicholas; Mascaro, Lisa (May 21, 2024). "Election deniers moving closer to GOP mainstream, report shows, as Trump allies fill Congress". AP. Retrieved August 15, 2024.
- ^ Blanco, Adrián; Wolfe, Daniel; Gardner, Amy (November 7, 2022). "Tracking which 2020 election deniers are winning, losing in the midterms". Washington Post. Retrieved August 15, 2024.
- ^ "Supreme Court strikes down century-old New York law, dramatically expanding Second Amendment rights to carry guns outside the home". Business Insider. Archived from the original on June 26, 2022. Retrieved November 21, 2022.
- ^ "Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade, ending 50 years of federal abortion rights". CNBC. June 24, 2022. Archived from the original on June 24, 2022. Retrieved November 21, 2022.
- ^ "How Election Week 2022 Went Down". FiveThirtyEight. November 8, 2022. Archived from the original on November 16, 2022. Retrieved November 17, 2022.
- from the original on November 18, 2022. Retrieved November 9, 2022.
- from the original on November 12, 2022. Retrieved November 10, 2022.
- ^ Cowan, Richard (November 17, 2022). "Republicans win U.S. House majority, setting stage for divided government". Reuters. Archived from the original on November 25, 2022. Retrieved November 17, 2022.
- ^ "State Partisan Composition", May 23, 2023, National Conference of State Legislatures, retrieved July 4, 2023. Archived July 4, 2023, at the Wayback Machine.
- Colorado Springs Gazette, retrieved July 4, 2023
- ^ "In the States, Democrats All but Ran the Table", Archived July 4, 2023, at the Wayback Machine November 11, 2022, The New York Times, retrieved July 4, 2023
- from the original on November 22, 2022. Retrieved November 23, 2022.
- ^ Gomez, Henry (November 15, 2022). "Battleground Republicans unload on Trump ahead of expected 2024 announcement". NBC News. Archived from the original on November 23, 2022. Retrieved November 23, 2022.
- ^ Pfannenstiel, Brianne (July 15, 2024). ""Make America great again!": Iowa Republican chair gives fiery Trump nominating speech at RNC". The Des Moines Register. Retrieved July 18, 2024.
- ^ Press, Associated (March 12, 2024). "Trump clinches 2024 Republican nomination". PBS NewsHour. Retrieved June 11, 2024.
- ISBN 0826210902.
- ^ "The Origins of the Republican Party". UShistory.org. July 4, 1995. Archived from the original on September 30, 2012. Retrieved October 25, 2012.
- ^ Gould, pp. 14–15
- ^ Joyner, James. "The Changing Definition of 'Conservative'". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on May 25, 2017. Retrieved May 9, 2017.
- ^ "Grand Old Party", Oxford English Dictionary.
- ^ "Cartoon of the Day". HarpWeek.com. Archived from the original on September 21, 2011. Retrieved December 27, 2016.
- ^ "Ballots of United States: Indiana". University of North Carolina. Archived from the original on May 25, 2017. Retrieved February 6, 2017.
- ^ Lopez, Tomas (October 23, 2014). "Poor Ballot Design Hurts New York's Minor Parties ... Again". Brennan Center for Justice. Archived from the original on February 7, 2017. Retrieved February 6, 2017.
- ^ "See Sample Ballots for Today's Primary Elections". West Kentucky Star. May 19, 2015. Archived from the original on February 7, 2017. Retrieved February 6, 2017.
- ^ Bump, Philip (November 8, 2016). "Red vs. Blue: A history of how we use political colors". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on November 7, 2017. Retrieved October 30, 2017.
- ^ Drum, Kevin (November 13, 2004). "Red State, Blue State". Washington Monthly. Archived from the original on November 7, 2017. Retrieved October 30, 2017.
- ^ Drum, Kevin (November 14, 2004). "Red States and Blue States ... Explained!". Washington Monthly. Archived from the original on November 7, 2017. Retrieved October 30, 2017.
- ^ Bump, Philip. "Red vs. Blue: A history of how we use political colors". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on February 22, 2021. Retrieved November 8, 2018.
- ^ "The Third-Term Panic". Cartoon of the Day. November 7, 2003. Archived from the original on September 21, 2011. Retrieved September 5, 2011.
- ISBN 978-0-8131-6144-0. Archivedfrom the original on December 15, 2023. Retrieved March 24, 2023.
- ^ Foner, Eric (1988). Reconstruction: America's Unfinished Revolution, 1863–1877 (1st ed.). pp. 236–37.
- S2CID 266282896.
- ISBN 0805797238.
- ^ ISSN 1538-165X.
- ^ .
- ^ ISSN 1094-2939.
- ISBN 978-3-030-17997-7, retrieved June 13, 2024,
the Republicans changed from being a right of centre coalition of moderates and conservatives to an unambiguously right-wing party that was hostile not only to liberal views but also to any perspective that clashed with the core views of an ideologically cohesive conservative cadre of party faithfuls
- from the original on October 27, 2023. Retrieved October 27, 2023.
- ^ "The 8 Types Of Democrats And Republicans In The House". FiveThirtyEight. May 4, 2024.
- ^ Aratani, Lauren (February 26, 2021). "Republicans unveil two minimum wage bills in response to Democrats' push". The Guardian. Archived from the original on August 14, 2021. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
In keeping with the party's deep division between its dominant Trumpist faction and its more traditionalist party elites, the twin responses seem aimed at appealing on one hand to its corporate-friendly allies and on the other hand to its populist rightwing base. Both have an anti-immigrant element.
- ^ .
- ^ PMID 37362148.
- ^ Martin, Jonathan (June 10, 2014). "Eric Cantor Defeated by David Brat, Tea Party Challenger, in G.O.P. Primary Upset". The New York Times.
- ^ Lizza, Ryan (December 14, 2015). "A House Divided: How a radical group of Republicans pushed Congress to the right". The New Yorker. Retrieved January 8, 2016.
- ^ Steinhauer, Jennifer (September 25, 2015). "John Boehner Will Resign From Congress". The New York Times. Retrieved October 8, 2015.
- ^ "McCarthy elected House speaker in rowdy post-midnight vote". AP News. January 7, 2023. Retrieved April 22, 2024.
- ^ "Speaker McCarthy ousted in historic House vote, as scramble begins for a Republican leader". AP News. October 3, 2023. Retrieved April 22, 2024.
- ^ a b Jones, Jeffrey M. (February 22, 2019). "Conservatives Greatly Outnumber Liberals in 19 U.S. States". Gallup. Archived from the original on February 22, 2019. Retrieved December 27, 2021.
- ISBN 978-0-19-976431-0.
- ISBN 978-0719060205. Archivedfrom the original on January 20, 2023. Retrieved February 2, 2023.
Ideologically, all US parties are liberal and always have been. Essentially they espouse classical liberalism, that is a form of democratised Whig constitutionalism plus the free market. The point of difference comes with the influence of social liberalism" and the proper role of government... ...the American right has nothing to do with maintaining the traditional social order, as in Europe. What it believes in is... individualism... The American right has tended towards... classical liberalism...
- ^ a b Rucker, Philip; Costa, Robert (March 21, 2016). "Trump questions need for NATO, outlines noninterventionist foreign policy". The Washington Post.
- ^ S2CID 240577549.
- ^ "The growing peril of national conservatism". The Economist. February 15, 2024. Archived from the original on February 15, 2024. Retrieved February 15, 2024.
- ^ "The Republican Party no longer believes America is the essential nation". The Economist. October 26, 2023. Archived from the original on February 13, 2024. Retrieved February 14, 2024.
- ^ Mullins, Luke (May 8, 2024). "FreedomWorks Is Closing — And Blaming Trump". Politico Magazine. Retrieved May 8, 2024.
- ^ from the original on October 12, 2023. Retrieved October 9, 2023.
- ^ a b Doherty, Carroll (January 19, 2023). "How Republicans view their party and key issues facing the country as the 118th Congress begins". Pew Research Center. Archived from the original on January 21, 2023. Retrieved January 21, 2023.
There are fissures in the GOP coalition. The same typology study found fissures in the GOP coalition, including over economic fairness, tax policy, and in views of abortion and same-sex marriage.
- ^ "About". Republican Study Committee. December 19, 2013. Archived from the original on January 11, 2024. Retrieved February 14, 2024.
- ^ Desilver, Drew (January 23, 2023). "Freedom Caucus likely to play a bigger role in new GOP-led House. So who are they?". Pew Research Center. Archived from the original on January 8, 2024. Retrieved February 14, 2024.
- ^ "Five things you should know about Mormon politics". Religion News Service. April 27, 2015. Retrieved July 16, 2020.
- ^ a b c d Williams, Daniel K. (May 9, 2022). "This Really Is a Different Pro-Life Movement". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on May 10, 2022. Retrieved February 2, 2023.
This was not merely a geographic shift, trading one region for another, but a more fundamental transformation of the anti-abortion movement's political ideology. In 1973 many of the most vocal opponents of abortion were northern Democrats who believed in an expanded social-welfare state and who wanted to reduce abortion rates through prenatal insurance and federally funded day care. In 2022, most anti-abortion politicians are conservative Republicans who are skeptical of such measures. What happened was a seismic religious and political shift in opposition to abortion that has not occurred in any other Western country.
- ISBN 9781316516263.
White Christian Nationalists are today the base of the Republican Party and those who attacked the U.S. Capitol are drawn from their ranks.
- ^ "First of Its Kind Survey Maps Support for Christian Nationalism Across All 50 States". Public Religion Research Institute. February 7, 2024. Archived from the original on June 16, 2024. Retrieved June 15, 2024.
At the national level, Christian nationalism is strongly linked to Republican Party affiliation, white evangelical Protestant affiliation, and higher church attendance.
- ISBN 9780190057909.
- ^ "A Christian Nation? Understanding the Threat of Christian Nationalism to American Democracy and Culture". Public Religion Research Institute. February 8, 2023. Archived from the original on June 15, 2024. Retrieved June 16, 2024.
Partisanship is closely linked to Christian nationalist views. Most Republicans qualify as either Christian nationalism sympathizers (33%) or adherents (21%), while at least three-quarters of both independents (46% skeptics and 29% rejecters) and Democrats (36% skeptics and 47% rejecters) lean toward rejecting Christian nationalism. Republicans (21%) are about four times as likely as Democrats (5%) or independents (6%) to be adherents of Christian nationalism.
- hdl:1805/26816.
Christian nationalism has become a powerful predictor of supporting conservative policies and political candidates. This is in large part due to the Republican Party platform becoming synonymous with "restoring" the sacred values, moral superiority, unity, pride, and prosperity of America's mythic past.
- .
The current study establishes that, independent of these influences, voting for Trump was, at least for many Americans, a symbolic defense of the United States' perceived Christian heritage. Data from a national probability sample of Americans surveyed soon after the 2016 election shows that greater adherence to Christian nationalist ideology was a robust predictor of voting for Trump...
- from the original on April 5, 2024. Retrieved June 16, 2024.
The strength of Christian nationalist sentiment can be clearly seen in a wide range of issues that Republican elected officials have stressed, including efforts to curtail the rights and visibility of transgender people, but also some less obvious topics, such as immigration.
- from the original on June 16, 2024. Retrieved June 16, 2024.
According to political scientists Stella Rouse and Shibley Telhami, most Republicans support declaring the United States a Christian nation. And Christian nationalists are running for office at all levels of government, from local school boards to presumptive presidential candidates. Though the numbers of those who claim Christian nationalist beliefs may decline, Christian nationalism's influence in public life only continues to grow.
- from the original on June 1, 2024. Retrieved June 16, 2024.
The presence of Christian nationalist ideas in recent political campaigns is concerning, given its ties to violence and white supremacy. Trump and his advisers helped to mainstream such rhetoric with events like his photo op with a Bible in Lafayette Square in Washington following the violent dispersal of protesters, and making a show of pastors laying hands on him. But that legacy continues beyond his administration.
- ^ Cummings, Mike (March 15, 2022). "Yale sociologist Phil Gorski on the threat of white Christian nationalism". Yale News. Archived from the original on June 12, 2024. Retrieved June 16, 2024.
White Christian nationalism is a dangerous threat because it's incredibly well-organized and powerful. There's absolutely nothing like it on the left.
- ^ Smith, Peter (February 17, 2024). "Many believe the founders wanted a Christian America. Some want the government to declare one now". The Associated Press. New York. Archived from the original on February 19, 2024. Retrieved February 22, 2024.
- ^ Rouse, Stella; Telhami, Shibley (September 21, 2022). "Most Republicans Support Declaring the United States a Christian Nation". Politico. Archived from the original on September 27, 2022. Retrieved February 22, 2024.
Christian nationalism, a belief that the United States was founded as a white, Christian nation and that there is no separation between church and state, is gaining steam on the right. Prominent Republican politicians have made the themes critical to their message to voters in the run up to the 2022 midterm elections.
- ISBN 978-0-534-61716-5.
- ISBN 9781784412227.
- ^ Brunn, Stanley D., Gerald R. Webster, and J. Clark Archer. "The Bible Belt in a changing south: Shrinking, relocating, and multiple buckles." Southeastern Geographer 51.4 (2011): 513–549. online
- ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved March 22, 2017.
- ^ Karni, Annie; Graham, Ruth; Eder, Steve (October 28, 2023). "For Mike Johnson, Religion Is at the Forefront of Politics and Policy". The New York Times.
- ^ "Christian conservatives cheer one of their own as Mike Johnson assumes Congress' most powerful seat". AP News. October 27, 2023. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
- ^ Dionne Jr., E.J. (1991). Why Americans Hate Politics. New York: Simon & Schuster. p. 161.
- ^ Poole, Robert (August–September 1998), "In memoriam: Barry Goldwater", Reason (Obituary), archived from the original on June 28, 2009
- OCLC 260069067.
Libertarians for Life declare that abortion is not a right but a 'wrong under justice.'
- ^ a b "Who are Mike Lee and Rand Paul, the senators slamming the White House's Iran briefing?". The Courier-Journal. Archived from the original on December 15, 2023. Retrieved May 26, 2023.
- ^ "Sen. Rand Paul talks CPAC straw poll victory, looks ahead to 2016". Hannity with Sean Hannity (Fox News Network). March 18, 2013. Archived from the original on April 1, 2013.
- ^ Miller, Joshua (December 22, 2012). "Scientist, Farmer Brings Tea Party Sensibility to House". Roll Call. Archived from the original on September 1, 2020. Retrieved September 1, 2020.
- ^ Glueck, Katie (July 31, 2013). "Paul, Cruz and Lee in rare form". Politico. Archived from the original on May 26, 2023. Retrieved May 26, 2023.
- ^ "Where the Republican Party stands after Trump, according to Wyoming's junior senator". Politico. April 26, 2021. Archived from the original on March 8, 2023. Retrieved March 8, 2023.
- ^ a b Kashinsky, Lisa (July 19, 2023). "Sununu's exit spells the end of a whole breed of Republican governor". POLITICO. Archived from the original on November 8, 2023. Retrieved November 8, 2023.
- ^ "Losing Its Preference: Affirmative Action Fades as Issue". The Washington Post. 1996. Archived from the original on February 23, 2017.
- ^ Silverleib, Alan (May 6, 2009). "Analysis: An autopsy of liberal Republicans". cnn.com. Retrieved October 14, 2018.
- ^ Tatum, Sophie (December 20, 2018). "3 Kansas legislators switch from Republican to Democrat". CNN. Retrieved January 8, 2021.
- ^ Weiner, Rachel. "Charlie Crist defends party switch". The Washington Post. Retrieved January 8, 2021.
- ^ Davis, Susan (August 23, 2019). "Meltdown On Main Street: Inside The Breakdown Of The GOP's Moderate Wing". NPR. Archived from the original on June 17, 2022. Retrieved June 17, 2022.
- ^ Plott, Elaina (October 6, 2018). "Two Moderate Senators, Two Very Different Paths". The Atlantic. Retrieved February 23, 2019.
- ^ Faludi, Susan (July 5, 2018). "Opinion - Senators Collins and Murkowski, It's Time to Leave the G.O.P." The New York Times. Retrieved February 23, 2019 – via NYTimes.com.
- ^ Petre, Linda (September 25, 2018). "Kavanaugh's fate rests with Sen. Collins". TheHill. Retrieved February 23, 2019.
- ^ Connolly, Griffin (October 9, 2018). "Sen. Lisa Murkowski Could Face Reprisal from Alaska GOP". rollcall.com. Archived from the original on October 11, 2018. Retrieved February 23, 2019.
- ^ Bacon, Perry (March 30, 2018). "How A Massachusetts Republican Became One Of America's Most Popular Politicians". fivethirtyeight.com. FiveThirtyEight. Archived from the original on May 7, 2019. Retrieved February 23, 2019.
- ^ "Gov. Larry Hogan positions himself as moderate on the national stage at second inauguration". WUSA. January 16, 2019. Archived from the original on February 21, 2019. Retrieved February 23, 2019.
- ^ Richards, Parker (November 3, 2018). "The Last Liberal Republicans Hang On". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on November 9, 2018. Retrieved February 23, 2019.
- from the original on July 18, 2024. Retrieved July 17, 2024.
- ^ a b Ball, Molly (January 23, 2024). "The GOP Wants Pure, Uncut Trumpism". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on January 24, 2024. Retrieved February 22, 2024.
- ^ Aratani, Lauren (February 26, 2021). "Republicans unveil two minimum wage bills in response to Democrats' push". The Guardian. Archived from the original on August 14, 2021. Retrieved September 7, 2021.
In keeping with the party's deep division between its dominant Trumpist faction and its more traditionalist party elites, the twin responses seem aimed at appealing on one hand to its corporate-friendly allies and on the other hand to its populist rightwing base. Both have an anti-immigrant element.
- ^ Wren, Adam; Montellaro, Zach; Kashinsky, Lisa; Shepard, Steven; Allison, Natalie; Piper, Jessica (February 25, 2024). "Hidden in Trump's big South Carolina win: A not-so-small problem for him in November". Politico. Archived from the original on February 25, 2024. Retrieved February 25, 2024.
From top to bottom, the Republican Party is Trump's party. There are no reliable pockets of dissent.
- ^ a b Klein, Rick; Parks, MaryAlice (June 13, 2018). "Trumpism again dominates Republican Party". ABC News. Retrieved June 12, 2024.
- ^ a b "Trump remains dominant force in GOP following acquittal". AP News. February 14, 2021. Retrieved June 12, 2024.
- ^ a b Martin, Jonathan (March 1, 2021). "Trumpism Grips a Post-Policy G.O.P. as Traditional Conservatism Fades". The New York Times. Retrieved June 12, 2024.
- ^ a b The Christian Science Monitor (November 5, 2020). "Why Trumpism is here to stay". The Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved June 12, 2024.
- ^ "Panel Study of the MAGA Movement". University of Washington. January 6, 2021. Retrieved March 24, 2024.
- ^ Gabbatt, Adam; Smith, David (August 19, 2023). "'America First 2.0': Vivek Ramaswamy pitches to be Republicans' next Trump". the Guardian. Retrieved March 24, 2024.
- S2CID 216298689.
- ^ Cassidy, John (February 29, 2016). "Donald Trump is Transforming the G.O.P. Into a Populist, Nativist Party". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved July 22, 2016.
- ^ ""National conservatives" are forging a global front against liberalism". The Economist. London. February 15, 2024. Archived from the original on February 20, 2024.
- PMID 36532330.
On a practical level, the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union and Trump's election as the United States president are regarded as typical events of neo-nationalism.
- ^ Katzenstein, Peter J. (March 20, 2019). "Trumpism is US". WZB | Berlin Social Science Center. Retrieved September 11, 2021.
- ^ DiSalvo, Daniel (Fall 2022). "Party Factions and American Politics". National Affairs. Archived from the original on March 23, 2023. Retrieved April 11, 2023.
- ISBN 978-1315226446.
Trump unabashedly employed the language of white supremacy and misogyny, rage and even violence at Trump rallies was like nothing seen in decades.
- ^ Bennhold, Katrin (September 7, 2020). "Trump Emerges as Inspiration for Germany's Far Right". The New York Times. Archived from the original on November 20, 2020. Retrieved November 20, 2020.
- ISBN 978-1-5438-2683-8. Retrieved December 31, 2023.
- . Retrieved December 31, 2023.
- S2CID 26010609.
- ^ Chatelain, Ryan (March 10, 2023). "Freedom Caucus issues demands for raising debt limit". Spectrum News NY1. Retrieved December 31, 2023.
- ISBN 978-1-000-86223-2.
- ^ a b Falk, Thomas O (November 8, 2023). "Why are US Republicans pushing for aid to Israel but not Ukraine?". Al Jazeera. Retrieved December 31, 2023.
- ^ a b Riccardi, Nicholas (February 19, 2024). "Stalled US aid for Ukraine underscores GOP's shift away from confronting Russia". Associated Press. Retrieved February 28, 2024.
- ^ a b Lillis, Mike (February 28, 2024). "GOP strained by Trump-influenced shift from Reagan on Russia". The Hill. Retrieved February 28, 2024.
Experts say a variety of factors have led to the GOP's more lenient approach to Moscow, some of which preceded Trump's arrival on the political scene ... Trump's popularity has only encouraged other Republicans to adopt a soft-gloves approach to Russia.
- ^ a b Ball, Molly (February 23, 2024). "How Trump Turned Conservatives Against Helping Ukraine". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved February 28, 2024.
- ^ a b Jonathan, Chait (February 23, 2024). "Russian Dolls Trump has finally remade Republicans into Putin's playthings". Intelligencer. Retrieved February 28, 2024.
But during his time in office and after, Trump managed to create, from the grassroots up, a Republican constituency for Russia-friendly policy ... Conservatives vying to be the Trumpiest of them all have realized that supporting Russia translates in the Republican mind as a proxy for supporting Trump. Hence the politicians most willing to defend his offenses against democratic norms — Marjorie Taylor Greene, Jim Jordan, Tommy Tuberville, Mike Lee, J. D. Vance — hold the most anti-Ukraine or pro-Russia views. Conversely, the least-Trumpy Republicans, such as Mitch McConnell and Mitt Romney, have the most hawkish views on Russia. The rapid growth of Trump's once-unique pro-Russia stance is a gravitational function of his personality cult.
- ^ a b Lange, Jason (January 17, 2024). "Trump's rise sparks isolationist worries abroad, but voters unfazed". Reuters. Retrieved January 17, 2024.
- ^ a b Swan, Jonathan; Savage, Charlie; Haberman, Maggie (December 9, 2023). "Fears of a NATO Withdrawal Rise as Trump Seeks a Return to Power". New York Times. Retrieved December 10, 2023.
- ^ ISSN 1553-8095. Retrieved February 21, 2024.
- ^ Collinson, Stephen (October 4, 2023). "McCarthy became the latest victim of Trump's extreme GOP revolution". CNN. Retrieved December 31, 2023.
- ^ Rocha, Alander (September 7, 2023). "Mike Rogers says of 'far-right wing' of GOP: 'You can't get rid of them'". AL. Retrieved December 31, 2023.
- ^ Macpherson, James (July 24, 2021). "Far right tugs at North Dakota Republican Party". AP News. Retrieved December 31, 2023.
- ^ "Fringe activists threaten Georgia GOP's political future". The Times Herald. May 15, 2023. Retrieved December 31, 2023.
- ^ ISBN 978-0190628697. Archivedfrom the original on December 15, 2023. Retrieved April 23, 2021 – via Google Books.
Contemporary debate is fueled on one side by immigration restrictionists, led by President Donald Trump and other elected republicans, whose rhetorical and policy assaults on undocumented Latin American immigrants, Muslim refugees, and family-based immigration energized their conservative base.
- ISBN 978-0190086350.
- from the original on May 5, 2023. Retrieved May 5, 2023.