User talk:Robotam

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

Excellent work getting ahead of Mykungfu this week. I'd say this was his most concerted effort to mess with the wiki yet, and it failed largely because of your efforts. Thank you. BTW, there's a new editor moving through some of the same pages - looks innocuous so far, but let me know if you see any suspicious edits. | Mr. Darcy talk 17:44, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should label real96 [2] a possible sockpuppet of user:mykungfu . A checkuser has been requested by MrDarcy [3]

aww, you're so brave when you say someone is a banned user [4] , but you won't put a little sockpuppet thing on their page? 172.165.197.198 05:53, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A few names missing from please update and make names match.. thanks..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Suspected_Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Mykungfu

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Mykungfu

also add real96  :)

• hmm...OK. Thanks for your input, MKF!-Robotam 17:27, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

JeffGent is non other than MKF.--Ccson 21:39, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This story was really meant for MrDarcy, Ccson, Robotam, Real96/Bearly541 (the edit's to the links and Real's edits to bearly's talk page gave it away) since they were always wondering as to what drove MyKungFu. Initially it was to spread the message of some of the ills that went on with some greek organizations. It later became some of the ills (that had factual basis) of other groups. After a while it was simply the joy of the debate (sentence by sentence as it seemed). Even if you don't know who I am, you are like a family. We've been debating for over a year. The cat and mouse, it honestly has been fun. Some of the article that were initially created were in good faith or eventually became good faith, Gamma Phi, Charles C. Poindexter, Walter M. Kimbrough, Holcombe Rucker, Sigma Pi Phi, and Alpha Kappa Nu. I learned strong references and loved to debate them. I know that many organizations like to be seen in a good light especially when they have their members editing it. That though shouldn't stop Wikipedia as being a source of the whole truth. Which is what I feel was being stopped from being shown. E.g. the hazing incidents of many greek organizations. The ban was a ban; and I asked for the account to be unblocked after a few months. It never happened. Oh well... Many of my screen names were caught, but in the chase there were a number of screen names that you mistakenly thought was MyKungFu. I can tell you that Vkmayes and Mukokeri weren't mine. I really laughed when I saw Real96 labeled a sock; MrDarcy than did a checkuser on her and when it was found false wouldn't apologize. Also how JeffGent was almost labeled a sock by Ccson on Robotam's page. It's funny how so many IP's were labeled socks when they weren't socks at all. Anyway, I am writing because I am currently going thru a family crises. My brother was seriously injured in Iraq by a rocket attack. I found out today on my way back home. I won't be on Wikipedia for a long time. In all it's been a lot of fun. All the best...

MyKungFu MyWingChun 05:19, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wish you well, and your brother the best on a speedy recovery. I know a thing or two about your angst. When you come back, as I am sure you will, I seriously hope you will go about being re-instated the right way, and then offer your energy to positively contributing to this encyclopedia. People are not as against you as you seem to believe, but even if they were, spite and retaliation make us smaller, not those that we believe persecute us. Here's hoping we all follow the facts, not the agenda! Hotep,-Robotam 16:13, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Found another sockpage

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ShannonRawls 24.57.141.232 03:30, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please read here . [5] . it concerns allegations that i've been on wikipedia. Please file a checkuser or something else. Those edits aren't even my style. Past that, thanks my brother is doing better. Past that, what way could i be reinstated? all the best. MKF

Looking here... i've never threatened lawsuits http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ccson#Threat_from_User:Osiris06

Thanks for uploading

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:07, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

The listing you have on the Alpha Phi Alpha page about Fort Des Moines is incorrect. It is about Omega Psi Phi. Why did you change it back, and said i was a vandalize Wikipedia for making the correction?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Agodofman (talk • contribs) 12:28, 19 April 2007

I have updated the photo information. I was the one who created the graphic in the 1990's. The photos were used on a number of web-sites after I created since fraternity web-sites generally borrow or take graphics from each other. I was also the author of the history of stepping information that the web-site had on it.--EhavEliyahu 11:40, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My decision to undo your edits in reference to the Exhibition drill article is due to the fact that the image which is displayed is already on the United States Marine Corps Silent Drill Platoon article and does not display any "spectacular" spins or tosses. I was searching for possible replacements that would highlight this fact versus showing a very staged and small image of the Silent Drill Platoon infront of the Commadants quarters. -Signaleer 04:10, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

not a problem, but i think the article might benefit from showing more than rifle spins or tosses, thus the insertion of the "fan" formation pic. doesn't really matter if a pic is used in more than one article.-Robotam 14:40, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How would it "benefit"? The image which you are proposing to use of the Silent Drill Platoon does not focus specificially on the members of the unit but also the Commadants quarters which I think detracts from the subject matter which is the exhibition drill. -Signaleer 14:46, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Respectfully disagree. The pic appropriately shows different setting of exhibiton drill, whether it be competition, Twighlight Tattoo, Evening Parade, Battle Colors Ceremony, or The Old Guard performing their soloists routine during the Army's 231st Birthday celebration.-Robotam 14:56, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Then we can agree to disagree that the photograph you are proposing to use is appropriate for the section. -Signaleer 07:03, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did you actually write that or was it a bot? I didn't blank it, i was just trying to change it ,messed up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cosprings (talk • contribs)

I guess when you read this you'll be break from from your wikibreak. I am working on getting the

Outstanding work, I would be honored to participate.-Robotam 13:46, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of Alpha Phi Alpha brothers has been nominated a

Can you post you Support of the list on the List of Alpha Phi Alpha brothers page?--Ccson 14:56, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The

The merger tag has been removed per your revision. Nice article, by the way. – Liveste 02:20, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I have a lot more information and scanned pics in another location, so this will have to do for now.-Robotam 12:59, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I've started a vote on the merger of the above at [[6]] directly beneath your recent comments. Could you vote, following the format that I've used under your own heading. As you probably know, anyone can express a view on this - one of the great things about Wikipedia. This needs to be sorted quickly as new editors keep adding re-directs, trying to seperate the article, moving the name and so on causing real confusion. I believe there should only be: hip hop music, and hip hop culture. Otherwise new eds will go to hip hop and assume it's solely about music and start changing it without realising there's a separate article. Thanks. Regards. Escaper2007 16:50, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good move---you may want to clarify your suggestion (in the Rfc) as being a merge that results in two articles:

Have a look at my proposal per above Escaper2007 17:03, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sorry, I meant clarify on the Rfc section of the talk page. I'm fine with merging Hip hop & Hip hop music (with Hip Hop becoming a disambig page); although I am not fine with the current Hip Hop music page, which is...sorry, a mess.-Robotam 17:19, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I'm out of time, but why don't you vote anyway, it'll all start to look a little clearer then.Escaper2007 17:22, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Robotam: Why do you think you are the arbitrator of the hip hop pages? Why would you revert a page back a great length of time, wasting all the edits and effort many people have put into it, not to mention all the votes cast in an election you enacted? Nowhere in that discussion do I see anyone else agreeing with you suggestion about switching all that information around. Why do you insist on complication? Why do you assume you know more about hip hop than anyone? I do not seek answers to these questions, so don't waste your time writing me some long and preachy harangue about being nice on wikipedia, because I won't read it. I am not obligated to be nice in everything I do, I am only obligated to be sincere. I'm done with these hip hop pages.Cosprings 19:34, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The

I have added some of the names for your list of notable Beta members. Lawrence Ross, author of The Divine Nine posted a comment on my talk page about adding LeRoi Jones, who was initiated at Beta. Ross provided a link of Beta Lines but I still couldn't Jone's name and I don't believe he was listed in your link of notable beta member. Can you provide some insight and a possible web site so I can add this name?--Ccson 04:51, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, Ross updated my userp page that Jones/Baraka is an eternal Sphinxman from Howard in this text

Bro. Ross again. I decided to go to Amazon and search inside Amiri Baraka's autobio and see what I could find. As it turns out, he does talk about being a Sphinxman, but ultimately not being initiated into Alpha. His perspective on pledging is both humorous, a lot sad and pretty modern, by the way, considering the experience he details at Howard.

Many are called. . .--Ccson 04:45, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi--I didn't delete the article (which I don't have authority to do), but I did tag it. the explanation below was left on your talk page:
A tag has been placed on