User talk:Simmaren

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Welcome to Novels WikiProject

Hi, and welcome to the

Novels WikiProject
! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to fiction books often referred to as "Novels".

A few features that you might find helpful:

  • Our
    navigation box
    points to most of the useful pages within the project.
  • The
    Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Outreach/User WPNOVELS
    }}.
  • The project has a monthly newsletter; it will normally be delivered as a link, but other methods are available.

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the members, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 07:37, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A Talent for War

All seems very good - I has raised its class to "B" - all I can add is some more by way of critical reviews and literary significance would be good. Also are there more rewards and nominations that came its way.! :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 08:12, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your Userboxes

The top one here looks good, the bottom 3 show four vertical bars |||| : lots of folks don't have the Eastern languages systems installed. --Lexein 22:11, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    • Thanks for pointing that out - I hadn't thought about the problem of showing Eastern languages. I'll change all of the ID boxes to show the feather as in # 1. Simmaren 22:35, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      • Oh, I thought images of the chars would be cool, and platform-independant. --Lexein 02:44, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      • I agree that they're cool. What I may do when I have time is produce another set with the Japanese characters, then note for people why they may want to use one set or another. Simmaren 02:50, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jane Austen

Thank you for the note, Simmaren. I am glad to see that someone is working on

Severa (!!!) 00:51, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Jane Austen

I am so happy that someone is dedicated to improving the Austen page (it is a travesty at the moment). I wonder if you would be interested in working together on your draft. I am a graduate student specializing in eighteenth-century British literature, so I would be more than happy to help out with the sections you have not yet completed. I can also offer a long list of helpful scholarly sources. See

talk 05:08, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Wiki editing tool

I wondered if you were using a wiki editing tool like

talk 18:27, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

The Wrongs of Woman

If you have any time in the next few weeks, would you mind peer-reviewing the article I wrote on Wollstonecraft's

talk 01:35, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Apologies

Sorry I haven't been very productive over the last few days - I have been immersed in the

talk 08:02, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Austen novels

Do you want to read the Austen novels together? We could have little chats about them over virtual tea.

talk 12:16, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply
]


Almost done...

I'm sorry I haven't added any notes recently. I am almost done with my

talk 04:34, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Southam

Did you read any of Southam? There are three volumes and I was just wondering if you had read any of it already. :)

talk 02:43, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]


How tiresome

The AE/BE debate has now spilled over into a discussion of our potential article. See

talk 18:59, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

The only thing I thought you might want to add was that we had indeed considered the AE/BE issue and were going to bring in a BE expert. I may inadvertently have said I suggested the translation somewhere in the long debate - I just didn't remember. Sorry about that - you could correct that. One should always give credit where credit is due. There is no reason for you to get down into the mud on this one - it is just that little bit that I thought might need notarization. :) (Sorry about "potential" - my brain is fuzzy right now.)

talk 22:52, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:A Talent For War1.JPG

Thanks for uploading

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:27, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:A Talent For War2.JPG

Thanks for uploading

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:28, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I hope all is well. I am desperately trying to finish my notes so that I can start drafting in earnest. How are things going for you?

talk 06:49, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Timeline of Jane Austen

The timeline has been live for two days now and nothing of note has happened, either positively or negatively. Interesting in its own way. I started looking through the talk page of

talk 02:13, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Of course you may. Glad I could help Awadewit and a fellow typophile :) Best, Fvasconcellos (t·c) 03:08, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Contest

I'm going to see if we can enter

talk 02:24, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

  • Yes. Please do. I assume you will call in Mr. Davies to perform his Anglicising magic?
  • Which part is the first half? The biography? Your call, but I am inclined to put in the whole thing. We announced what we're doing a long time ago and people have had the chance to watch us (and to contribute).
  • I'm curious as well. The (non-)response to adding the timeline is encouraging, although it's hard to see what anyone could object to and it's not very visible (something to address). I'm more encouraged by the lack of response to your move of the media section. I thought that might be a flash point.
  • The history remains with the sandbox draft where any antiquarian can look at it who is interested. :)
  • In another place, you mentioned cutting back the reception piece. I like its scope as it is - it's a large topic and deserves a few paragraphs.

Core Contest Award

2008 Core Contest Winner Award
Let it be known that
Awadewit were awarded Best Overall and Best Collaborative Effort in the first Wikipedia Core Contest. This award is based on their outstanding work in improving Jane Austen. Thanks for your hard work in making Wikipedia's core articles better. -Earthdirt (talk) 04:11, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

FAC

Watch what can happen at FAC:

talk 20:54, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Read it. I'm glad you can still smile. Simmaren (talk) 21:43, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Encyclopédie

So, are you thinking

talk 02:11, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

  • My "
    talk 04:41, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply
    ]

JA timeline

What do you think about getting a

talk 01:35, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

  • Let's go for it. It's very good, and appears to me to meet the FLC. Almost entirely your work, so I get to say so. ;-) Simmaren (talk) 17:12, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Does Tony1 hang about WP:FAC? Does he have cousins who do? What was your experience with the MW timeline? Simmaren (talk) 17:12, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I agree that this chronology is at about the right level of detail. I envision the target readership as high school, college and first year graduate students in literature, literary history or just plain history who need context for further research. As a starting place for them, it's a treasure house. Simmaren (talk) 17:12, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Le Faye is for scholars, although it might not be a bad idea to include a reference to it to point the way for those who need more detail. Do you have (access to) the necessary biblio info? Are there other similar resources known to you that could be added? Simmaren (talk) 17:12, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • The lead needs more work, I think, but I'm unclear in my own mind how much. It seems a little too long and too much like the lead to the JA Article, which has a different purpose. I'm going to fiddle with it a bit - I'm concerned about messing up the footnotes but we can revert it and start again if necessary. Simmaren (talk) 17:12, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I haven't checked the images. Are you confident that they all have acceptable copyright status? Simmaren (talk) 17:13, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm going to add a cross-reference "for further information and references" at the top to the JA article. Simmaren (talk) 17:12, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Good points all - I will start dealing with them (do you mind if I copy this list to the talk page of the article?). What do you think about a
    talk 17:28, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • I will put it up for peer review and then solicit some feedback in the next few days.
    talk 18:13, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply
    ]

19th-century novels task force

Hi, Simmaren. I'm starting up a 19th-century novels task force for

WP:NOVELS. This would cover the works of many well-known authors, including Jane Austen, Charles Dickens, Mark Twain, Victor Hugo and Leo Tolstoy. If you think you'd be interested in supporting or participating in the task force, please let me know. Cheers. – Liveste [talk • contrib] 10:41, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Jane's tree

Drafts:

I've let Awadewit know too. Feedback either on my talk page or on the image talk page would work. Let me know what you'd like changed, and if there are errors. Mike Christie (talk) 18:52, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Whatever you guys decide to do is fine with me.
    talk 19:58, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
    ]


WikiProject Novels - 1st Coordinators Election

An election has been proposed and has been set up for this project. Description of the roles etc., can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Coordinators. If you wish to stand, enter your candidacy before the end of March and ask your questions of anyone already standing at Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Coordinators/May 2008. Voting will start on the 1st April and close at the end of April. The intention is for the appointments to last from May - November 2008. For other details check out the pages or ask. KevinalewisBot (talk) 13:58, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Hobbit - copyediting

Hi Simmaren, I've requested the League of Copyeditors take a look at The Hobbit. Your feedback on the article (re citations for adaptations etc.) a while back was invaluable, and would welcome your input on further improving it. --Davémon (talk) 20:21, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


WP:LOTD

Congratulations on getting what appears to be your first successful

WP:LOTD) 18:24, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXIV - May 2008

The

talk) 08:18, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Patrick O'Who?

Hi - just passing ... I see that on your user page you refer to the writer "Patrick O'Brien". Are you sure you don't mean Patrick O'Brian? I was going to correct it for you, and then I thought that would be a bit impertinent. SNALWIBMA ( talk - contribs ) 19:54, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks for calling this to my attention. I've corrected the error. I appreciate your courtesy and don't think I would have minded your correction if accompanied by a note here. At least, on a good day. ;) Simmaren (talk) 22:04, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome back!

I hope all is well! Let me know how you want to progress with Austen. Qp and I are finishing up

talk) 21:12, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Reception history of Jane Austen

This article is now at FAC. Please sign the nominating statement and adjust it as you see fit.

talk) 17:50, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Absolutely! Only the song itself pokes fun of the so-called universal truth from the woman's POV in a silly, earworm sort of way. :) María (habla conmigo) 18:53, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, it's great fun. Some parts are just too goofy not to laugh at, but the music is catchy and the story is, of course, timeless; so I hope even the most discerning critics in your house are able to enjoy it. (I was actually high on cough medicine when I went to see it with friends, but I'm sure it's just as good sober!) María (habla conmigo) 19:45, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Core contest

I know that it didn't work with the reward for the core contest and I'm willing to sponsor it by sending a package of quality lebkuchen. All I need is an adress. My email is kurt.scholz[at]gmx.de. In case you have reservations, sending me your adress User:Proteins has agreed to handle the distribution. Greetings Wandalstouring (talk) 20:20, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Talk:Patricianship#Merger_proposal

Hi, thank you for your recent contribution to discussion. I have posted an updated proposal for changes, please feel free to comment on the Talk page.--Goodmorningworld (talk) 16:59, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats!

Aw, thanks, but of course most of the credit goes to those who actually appreciate Austen. Ours is still a love/hate relationship. :) I'm glad you guys have another FA under the collective belt, and I look forward to seeing the next Austen collaboration. My projects next year will be far less ambitious than the first encyclopedia, however -- pushy environmentalists and angsty poets and such. But keep me posted! I'll gladly help where I'm able. María (habla conmigo) 02:55, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For a wonderful and patient collaborator

The Literary Barnstar
Thank you for your meticulous work on
talk) 03:46, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply
]


Happy New Year!

A noiseless patient spider,
I mark'd where on a little promontory it stood isolated,
Mark'd how to explore the vacant vast surrounding,
It launch'd forth filament, filament, filament, out of itself,
Ever unreeling them, ever tirelessly speeding them.

And you O my soul where you stand,
Surrounded, detached, in measureless oceans of space,
Ceaselessly musing, venturing, throwing, seeking the spheres to connect them,
Till the bridge you will need be form'd, till the ductile anchor hold,
Till the gossamer thread you fling catch somewhere, O my soul."

—"
talk) 05:53, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply
]


Adding notes

I don't think there is any reason to add substantially to our Austen notes at this point - we already have way too much material.

talk) 22:09, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

  • Just pointing out that way lies madness. :)
    talk) 23:39, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply
    ]


Credo Reference offer

Hi Simmaren. Credo is offering free accounts to qualified Wikipedia editors and I thought of you, though I imagine that as a practising attorney you probably have all these sources to hand anyway. If not, you might find

Credo's offer useful. - Pointillist (talk) 23:09, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply
]



New Jane Austen portal

Hi there, based upon your great work on Jane Austen-related articles, I thought I'd let you know I created Portal:Jane Austen. You are more than welcome to put your name down at Portal:Jane Austen/Editors if you're interested. Let me know if you have any queries. Thanks! Ruby 2010/2013 21:23, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]


TFAR

I thought of Reception history of Jane Austen for TFA, please join the discussion and trim the blurb ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:57, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]


  1. RECIPIENTS (CATEGORY) -->

Main Page appearance

Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of the article Timeline of Jane Austen know that it will be appearing as the main page featured list on December 17, 2012. You can view the TFL blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured list/December 17, 2012. If you think it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured list directors The Rambling Man (talk · contribs), Dabomb87 (talk · contribs) or Giants2008 (talk · contribs), or at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured list. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of the suggested formatting. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :D Thanks! Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 06:05, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A watercolour sketch of Jane Austen by her sister Cassandra

For

George III was declared permanently insane and his son was appointed as prince regent. Throughout most of Austen's adult life, Britain was at war with revolutionary France
.

Main page appearance: reception history of Jane Austen

This is a note to let the main editors of

Bencherlite (talk · contribs), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you can change it—following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions
. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below:

Jane Austen by her sister Cassandra

The

Bollywood-style production Bride and Prejudice. (Full article...
)

talk) 23:02, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Precious

reception history of Jane Austen
Thank you for quality contributions in teamwork around the Reception history of Jane Austen, her timeline, themes, style, family, juvenilia, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:45, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A year ago, you were the 379th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:12, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On a personal note: I love the alternative design by a missed friend, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Three years ago, you were recipient no. 379 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:29, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

QAI

Thank you today again for Reception history of Jane Austen, in fond memory! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:11, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Seven years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:19, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 09 April 2014

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The

Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!


Reception history of Jane Austen scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the

today's featured article for January 21, 2019. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/January 21, 2019
, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.

We also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors on the day before and the day of this TFA. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:34, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 January 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:50, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 28 February 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:16, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 March 2019

News, reports and features from the English Wikipedia's weekly journal about Wikipedia and Wikimedia

The Signpost: 30 April 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:37, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 May 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The June 2019 Signpost is out!

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:53, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 July 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 30 August 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:42, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 30 September 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:07, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 October 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:12, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 November 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:24, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 December 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:38, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 January 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 March 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:46, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 March 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:43, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 26 April 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:18, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 May 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:06, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Simmaren&oldid=1079384333"