User talk:Velimir85

Welcome!

Hello, Velimir85, and

to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

17:56, September 7, 2005 (UTC)

You may wish to vote for Belgrade at the Article Improvement Drive page,

]

Posted by (^'-')^ Covington 07:16, 1 May 2006 (UTC) on behalf of the the AID Maintenance Team[reply]

Since you're interested in history, I recommend you check out

, or some other articles I write.

Cheers! --PaxEquilibrium 21:56, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sve sto si planirao da dodas, slobodno dopisi, uklopicemo sve u clanak. Bilo bi lepo da imas i neku sliku sa Dorcola (ako si Dorcolac) :o) Pozdrav PajaBG 21:34, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gospodar Jevremova? Onda moram da prepravim clanak, odakle vi Dorcolci smatrate da vam pocinje Dorcol? :o) PajaBG 15:10, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Velimir, it is generally not acceptable to delete posts from other users on talk pages unless they are personally insulting. It is not up to you solely to decide what is POV. That is why discussion pages are included in the first place. Perhaps the editor was unable to find refs to back up his points, but that does not mean other editors should not be aware of his views. The talk page exists to make sure that there is a reasonable discussion and consensus before changes are made to the article proper, and discussion cannot exist if some users take it upon themsleves to act as censors. You don't have to like it, but you do have to tolerate discussion on subjects which you may find disasteful and sensitive. Davu.leon 09:48, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If, however, someone is using the article talk pages as a chat room, to make long rants not directly relevant to the article in question, it is ok to give them a friendly warning, and ask an admin to take a look at the issue if the behaviour is repeated. And, finally, if un-refernced claims are included in the article itself, it is fine to make a note on the talk page that you intend to delete these claims after an appropriate period, and then to remove them. (I would suggest waiting at least a week.) Davu.leon 10:00, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is really trivial. Information about Mila Jovovic's parents belongs in the Mila Jovovic article. If we are going to add all "trivia" related so barely to Serbia, the trivia section will be half the article! Wikipedia is not the place for everything and anything, it is an encyclopedia - not Jimbo's big bag of fun facts...:-) And if you're making your case on basis of other articles, let's see: Germany, France, Spain, United States, United Kingdom...where do you see a trivia section? --Methodius 22:49, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

please note the discussion on the biased name for war in croatia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Croatian_War_of_Independence, which is proposed to be moved to its original title.

Hello. There's a discussion going on

]

It's a minor, minor point, but I'd fed up to back teeth of arguing the point that we use Kosovo instead of Kosovan or Kosovar in Wikipedia as NPOV: this discussion is about 'Kosovo Elections' as opposed to 'Kosovar elections' or 'Kosovan elections' Template talk:Serbian local elections and a vote at Talk:Kosovo#Kosovo:_terminology. Perhaps you have no interest, in which case sorry to bother you! DSuser 14:15, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 08:42, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I made that map for a joke lol. But i agree with you over the Republika Srpska wanting annexation to Serbia for compensation over Kosovo and this would increase stability. The problem with the Balkans is that all ethnic Croats, Serbs, Albanians, Bosnians, Greeks, Bulgarians ect all want a country for their ethnicity and they want everyone of their ethnicity to be in that country.

I dont think BiH will split in the near future, but a few years after NATO/ UN troops leave, i can imagine Republika Srpska fully breaking away.

I don't think the ethnic Albanians in Western Macedonia will break away, because in a few years Macedonia should be NATO/EU and they won't allow it (Once they sort out the name thing).

I don't think that Macedonia will annex other lands because Greece and Bulgaria are both EU/NATO so they wont allow it, also in Greek Macedonia they are highly anti FYROM, so it would never work. I think Macedonia might rename itself Upper/ North Macedonia, but only if Greece renames its region Lower/ South Macedonia.

Peace

]

A tag has been placed on

what is generally accepted as notable

.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

]

Multiple accounts

You created the

]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

]

Ways to improve Serbia and Montenegro national rugby union team

Hello, Velimir85,

Thank you for creating

Serbia and Montenegro national rugby union team

.

page curation process

and note that:

Please add references to WP:Reliable sources

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Atlantic306}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the

.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Atlantic306 (talk) 02:03, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect

]

Nomination of

King Peter I Stadium

for deletion

Ravenswing 11:55, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]