The W89 was an American
What was to become the W89 design was awarded to the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in the mid-1980s. It entered Phase 2A technical definition and cost study in November 1986. It entered Phase 3 development engineering and was assigned the numerical designation W89 in January 1988.
The W89 design was a 13.3-inch (33.8 cm) diameter by 40.8-inch (103.6 cm) long weapon, with a weight of 324 pounds (147 kg) and yield of 200
The design was canceled in September 1991 along with the SRAM II missile, prior to production of any units, though some test devices may have been manufactured.
Reused plutonium pits
According to one source, the plutonium cores (technically known as
Lawrence Livermore engineers have hinted in prior press reports that the Reliable Replacement Warhead design that they were preparing might be based on the W89 warhead design. On March 2, 2007, the NNSA announced that the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory RRW design had been selected for the initial RRW production version.
One of the selection reasons given was that the LLNL proposed design was more closely tied to historical underground tested warhead designs. It was described by Thomas P. D'Agostino, acting head of the National Nuclear Security Administration, as having been based on a design which was test fired in the 1980s, but never entered service.
LLNL staff have previously hinted in the press that LLNL was considering a design entry based on the tested but never deployed W89 design. The W89 warhead had been proposed as a
- BLUE RIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE LEAGUE Southern Anti-Plutonium Campaign Archived 2010-10-27 at the Wayback Machine, Accessed 2006-05-07
- Design Selected for Reliable Replacement Warhead Archived 2007-03-09 at the Wayback Machine, NNSA Press release, March 2, 2007.
- Govt. Picks Design for Nuclear Warhead, NY Times / AP, March 2, 2007
- Scientists Dream Up New Nukes Archived 2016-03-03 at the Wayback Machine, Ira Hoffman, Alameda Times-Star, Feb 6, 2006. Accessed March 2, 2007
- An Assessment of US Nuclear Weapons and related Nuclear Test requirements: a post-Bush analysis Archived 2016-03-12 at the Wayback Machine, URCL-LR-109503, R.E. Kidder, 1991. Accessed March 2, 2007
- Report to Congress: Assessment of the Safety of US Nuclear Weapons and Related Nuclear Test Requirements Archived 2016-03-04 at the Wayback Machine, URCL-LR-107454, R.E. Kidder, 1991, Accessed March 2, 2007
- Pit Tubes and Pit Re-Use at Pantex, in Plutonium: the last Five Years Archived 2010-10-27 at the Wayback Machine, Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League, 2001, accessed March 2, 2007
- University of California 1989 nuclear weapons labs status report
- Allbombs.html at the Nuclear Weapon Archive at nuclearweaponarchive.org