2006 North Korean nuclear test
2006 North Korean nuclear test | |
---|---|
Information | |
Country | North Korea |
Test site | Punggye-ri Nuclear Test Site, Kilju County |
Period | 10:35:28 KST, October 9, 2006 |
Number of tests | 1 |
Test type | Unknown |
Device type | Fission |
Max. yield |
|
Test chronology | |
The 2006 North Korean nuclear test was the detonation of a nuclear device conducted by North Korea on October 9, 2006.
On October 3, 2006, North Korea announced its intention to conduct a
An anonymous official at the North Korean Embassy in Beijing told a South Korean newspaper that the explosive output was smaller than expected.
Reportedly the government of the People's Republic of China was given a 20-minute advance notification that the test was about to occur.
Background
This section needs additional citations for verification. (October 2017) |
|
North Korea had been suspected of maintaining a clandestine nuclear weapons development program since the early 1980s
However, in 2002, rumors circulated that North Korea was pursuing both
In early 2004 former Los Alamos National Laboratory director Siegfried S. Hecker, as part of an unofficial U.S. delegation, was allowed to inspect North Korea's plutonium production facilities. Hecker later testified before the United States Congress that while North Korea seems to have successfully extracted plutonium from the spent fuel rods, he saw no evidence at the time that they had actually produced a workable weapon.[14] In 2007, the former senior scientist of Pakistan, Dr. Abdul Qadeer Khan claimed that North Korea's nuclear program was well advanced before his visit in 1993 with Benazir Bhutto, former prime minister.[15][dubious ]
In September 2004, though, North Korean officials announced they had successfully processed Yongbyon plutonium into a workable nuclear deterrent. Through 2005 more diplomatic talks were attempted between the United States, North Korea, South Korea, China, Japan, and Russia (the six-party talks) but little concrete change occurred.
Because North Korea had not conducted a successful test of a nuclear device, the extent of its nuclear weapons program remained ambiguous through 2005 and much of 2006. Though North Korea conducted numerous missile tests (some of which were branded failures by international experts[
North Korean statements
Rumours of an impending nuclear test circulated during 2005 and early 2006, though none came to immediate fruition. On October 3, 2006, however, North Korea claimed that it would soon conduct a nuclear test, and on October 9, 2006, the state claimed to have successfully conducted a test. The Korean Central News Agency, the state's news agency, issued the following statement:[17]
The field of scientific research in the DPRK successfully conducted an
Juche 95(2006), at a stirring time when all the people of the country are making a great leap forward in the building of a great, prosperous, powerful socialist nation.It has been confirmed that there was no such danger as radioactive emission in the course of the nuclear test as it was carried out under scientific consideration and careful calculation.
The nuclear test was conducted with indigenous wisdom and technology 100 percent. It marks an historic event as it greatly encouraged and pleased the KPA and people that have wished to have powerful self-reliant defence capability.
It will contribute to defending the peace and stability on the
Korean Peninsulaand in the area around it.
Later, the North Korean envoy to the U.N. said it would be better for the Security Council to offer its congratulations rather than pass "useless" resolutions.[18]
Threats of war
On October 10, 2006, an unnamed North Korean official was quoted as saying that North Korea could launch a
On October 11, the
On the day of the test, the North Korean Foreign Ministry stated that "if the U.S. keeps pestering us and increases pressure, we will regard it as a declaration of war and will take a series of physical corresponding measures".[22]
On October 17, North Korea denounced UN sanctions over its nuclear test as a declaration of war and the United States and other nations suspected that North Korea was seeking to conduct a second nuclear test despite international pressure.[23]
Kim Jong-il's alleged apology
On October 20, 2006,
If the U.S. makes a concession to some degree, we will also make a concession to some degree, whether it be bilateral talks or six-party talks
Kim Jong-Il also stated that he had no future plans to test another nuclear device; the
Return to six-party talks
On October 31, 2006, North Korea agreed to rejoin six-nation disarmament talks. The agreement was struck in a day of unpublicized discussions between the senior envoys from the United States, China and North Korea at a government guesthouse in Beijing.[25] The talks resumed on December 18, 2006.
Yield estimates and authenticity
The low yield of the test initially raised questions as to whether it was a nuclear explosion but detection of airborne radioactive isotopes by a United States military aircraft confirmed that it was a nuclear explosion.
At a meeting with
According to Jane's Defence Weekly, "initial and unconfirmed South Korean reports indicate that the test was a fission device with a yield of 0.55 kT ... The figure of 0.55 kT, however, seems too low given the 4.2 register on the Richter scale. This could suggest – depending upon the geological make-up of the test site – a yield of 2–12 kT".[2]
An official in France's
However 7 years later, after the
By comparison, the first
If the North Korean device was significantly short of its predicted yield, it could be classified as a "fizzle" indicating that some aspect of the
On October 13, 2006,
On October 16, 2006, the United States government reported that a test had found radioactive gas compatible with a nuclear explosion.[8]
The office of
The explosion was also recorded worldwide by the global monitoring system operated by the Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO). Two weeks after the detonation, a CTBTO radionuclide monitoring station in northern Canada detected traces of the radioactive noble gas xenon in the air. Backtracking calculations by analysts at the CTBTO indicated that the xenon particles originated from North Korea and that the explosion had been nuclear in nature.[41]
Test site location
According to initial reports from South Korean government sources, the test was carried out at a mountain in Musadan-ri in
The
International reaction
International condemnation of the tests by governments has been nearly unanimous, including from North Korea's close ally and benefactor, the People's Republic of China.[45] All five veto-wielding permanent members of the United Nations Security Council condemned the nuclear test. On October 10, however, South Korean Prime Minister Han Myeong-sook told Parliament that South Korea will not support any United Nations resolution containing military measures against North Korea in retaliation for its nuclear test.[46]
Economic impact
Negative economic effects were seen throughout the region after the test. South Korea's
United Nations' response
On October 14, 2006, the UN Security Council unanimously approved limited military and economic
See also
- 2006 North Korean missile test
- Japan–North Korea relations
- Japan–North Korea Pyongyang Declaration (2002)
- List of nuclear weapons tests of North Korea
- List of states with nuclear weapons
- Mantapsan
- Milestone nuclear explosions
- North Korea and weapons of mass destruction
- North Korea–United States relations
- Six-party talks (2003 – 2009)
- United Nations Security Council Resolution 1718
References
- ^ a b Lian-Feng Zhao, Xiao-Bi Xie, Wei-Min Wang, and Zhen-Xing Yao, "Regional Seismic Characteristics of the 9 October 2006 North Korean Nuclear Test Archived September 23, 2015, at the Wayback Machine, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 2008 98:2571–2589; doi:10.1785/0120080128
- ^ a b "North Korea claims nuclear test". Archived from the original on October 16, 2006. Retrieved October 9, 2006.
- ^ a b "North Korea's Power Checked". Archived from the original on October 31, 2006. Retrieved October 11, 2006.
- ^ a b "BGR registered putative third North Korean nuclear test". February 15, 2013. Retrieved March 2, 2013.
- ^ "Search Results". USGS.
- ^ "North Korea's Punggye-ri Nuclear Test Site: Analysis Reveals Its Potential for Additional Testing with Significantly Higher Yields". 38North. March 10, 2017.
- ISBN 978-1-4379-2746-7.
- ^ a b c "U.S.: Test Points to N. Korea Nuke Blast". The Washington Post. October 13, 2006.
- ^ a b "North Korea Nuclear Test Confirmed by U.S. Intelligence Agency". Bloomberg. October 16, 2006. Archived from the original on September 30, 2007. Retrieved October 16, 2006.
- ^ "Dud or deception? Experts examine N. Korea claims". CNN. October 10, 2006. Archived from the original on October 28, 2006.
- ^ "North Korea says conducted nuclear test". Reuters. Retrieved October 9, 2006.[dead link]
- ^ "Test follows warning from U.N." International Herald Tribune. Archived from the original on October 9, 2006. Retrieved October 9, 2006.
- ^ Pike, John. "Nuclear Weapons Program - North Korea". GlobalSecurity.org. Retrieved May 21, 2020.
- ^ Visit to the Yongbyon Nuclear Scientific Research Center in North Korea, Siegfried S. Hecker, January 21, 2004
- ^ "ABC Exclusive: Pakistani Bomb Scientist Breaks Silence". ABC News. May 30, 2008.
- ^ Sanger, David (April 12, 2013). "Contrasting Views on North Korea Underscore Sensitivities and Lack of Evidence". New York Times. Retrieved October 9, 2014.
- ^ "DPRK Successfully Conducts Underground Nuclear Test". Korean Central News Agency. October 10, 2006. Archived from the original on October 26, 2006. Retrieved October 10, 2006.
- ^ US Asks for Tough UN Sanctions On North Korea Archived October 10, 2006, at the Wayback Machine Voice of America October 9, 2006
- ^ "North Korean test 'went wrong,' U.S. official says". CNN. Archived from the original on October 10, 2006. Retrieved October 11, 2006.
- ^ "Nuclear Weapons Program – North Korea". Archived from the original on October 9, 2006. Retrieved October 11, 2006.
- ^ a b c d Greimel, Hans (October 11, 2006). "North Korea threatens war over sanctions". Associated Press. Archived from the original on October 11, 2006. Retrieved October 11, 2006.
- ^ North Korea: Increased U.S. Pressure Would Be 'Act of War' Fox News October 11, 2006
- ^ North Korea Declares UN Scanctions As An Declaration Of warYahoo News October 17, 2006
- ^ "Report: Kim 'sorry' about N. Korea nuclear test". NBC News, The Associated Press and Reuters. October 20, 2006. Retrieved October 30, 2006.
- ^ "North Korea to rejoin 6-nation nuclear talks". NBC News. November 1, 2006.
- ^ "US confirms N Korea nuclear test". BBC News. October 16, 2006. Retrieved May 27, 2009.
- PMID 17186822. Retrieved February 18, 2014.
- ^ a b cnn.com, U.S. official: 'Something went wrong' on blast Archived October 11, 2006, at the Wayback Machine
- ^ a b "지진파가 나옵니다. 폭발입니다 Seismic waves. An Explosion.". The Chosun Ilbo (in Korean). October 9, 2006. Archived from the original on October 27, 2006. Retrieved October 9, 2006.
- SBS(in Korean). October 9, 2006. Retrieved October 9, 2006.
- ^ "Defense Tech: NORK Nuclear Test: It's A Dud (Updated)". Archived from the original on October 17, 2006.
- ^ "France says North Korean blast 'about half a kiloton'". Archived from the original on October 29, 2006. Retrieved October 9, 2006.
- ^ Scientists Probe North Korea Nuke Test[permanent dead link] October 9, 2006
- ^ Gertiz, Bill, U.S. doubts Korean test was nuclear, Washington Times, October 10, 2006
- ^ Seitz, Russel (October 13, 2006). "Commentary – Parody Physics Package?". Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on January 11, 2009. Retrieved October 13, 2006.
- ^ "Success, failure or bluff? Scientists pore over data". Archived from the original on October 31, 2006. Retrieved October 9, 2006.
- ^ "BGR registriert vermutlichen dritten nordkoreanischen Kernwaffentest". February 15, 2013. Retrieved March 2, 2013.
- ^ nuclear weapons design, see, for example, Carey Sublette's Nuclear Weapon Archive (esp. the Nuclear Weapons Frequently Asked Questions section). For detailed information, see Chuck Hansen, The Swords of Armageddon: US nuclear weapons development since 1945(Sunnyvale, CA: Chukelea Publications, 1995).
- ^ "Reactor-Grade and Weapons-Grade Plutonium in Nuclear Explosives".
- ^ "US confirms N Korea nuclear test". Archived from the original on October 27, 2006. Retrieved October 17, 2006.
- ^ "The CTBTO verification regime put to the test, CTBTO Press Centre 2007". Archived from the original on November 21, 2020. Retrieved April 16, 2012.
- ^ "N Korea's nuclear test backlash". The Sydney Morning Herald. October 9, 2006. Retrieved October 9, 2006.
- ^ "North Korean nuclear test site". Archived from the original on September 29, 2007. Retrieved October 9, 2006.
- ^ "Magnitude 4.3–North Korea (2006 October 09 01:35:28 UTC)". United States Geological Survey (USGS). October 9, 2010. Archived from the original on April 27, 2014. Retrieved December 11, 2010.
- ^ "North Korea's neighbors caution it not to conduct nuclear test". USA Today. October 4, 2006. Retrieved October 10, 2006.
- ^ "South Korea opposes any UN military measures against North". Archived from the original on October 1, 2007. Retrieved October 10, 2006.
- ^ "Seoul stocks tumble after North Korea confirms nuke test". Retrieved October 9, 2006.
- ^ "N Korea says conducted nuclear test". Archived from the original on October 14, 2006. Retrieved October 9, 2006.
- ^ "Market impact". Bloomberg. October 9, 2006. Retrieved October 9, 2006.
- ^ "Nth Korea says nuclear test conducted". Retrieved October 9, 2006.
- ^ "Gold prices rise 1%". Archived from the original on September 29, 2007. Retrieved October 9, 2006.
- ^ "Asian stocks tumble on North Korean nuclear test announcement". Archived from the original on October 1, 2007. Retrieved October 9, 2006.
- ^ "Current Dow Jones Industrial Average trading". Archived from the original on October 6, 2006. Retrieved October 9, 2006.
- ^ "North Korean Test Provokes Widespread Condemnation". Arms Control Today. November 2006. Archived from the original on November 8, 2006. Retrieved November 5, 2006.
External links
- Feature: North Korean Nuclear Test, Arms Control Today, November 2006
- UN-Resolution 1718 full text
- M 4.3 Nuclear Explosion – North Korea – United States Geological Survey
- Seismic data from Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology
- North Korea's nuclear facilities by Google Earth, including the site of the October 2006 test
- Position (according to USGS) at Google Maps
- Military history of the Chik-Tong area
- Newspaper article on reasons for conducting test
- Satellite Picture of test site on BBC News website
- CNN report on nuclear test
- CTBTO Press Centre, 'Infamous Anniversary': First DPRK nuclear test
Wikinews story chronology
2005
- February 10: "North Korea declares it has nuclear weapons; cancels talks"
- February 19: "North Korea has no further interest in negotiations with United States"
- May 11: "North Korea removes spent nuclear fuel rods"
- June 23: "No resolution in North Korean nuclear stalemate"
- September 19: "Nuclear arms agreement reached with North Korea"