Barisan Sosialis
Socialist Front Barisan Sosialis | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Chinese name | 社会主义阵线 Shèhuì Zhǔyì Zhènxiàn |
Malay name | Barisan Sosialis |
Tamil name | சோசலிஸ்ட் முன்னணி Cōcalisṭ muṉṉaṇi |
English name | Socialist Front |
Founders |
|
Founded | 29 July 1961 |
Dissolved | May 1988[a] |
Split from | People's Action Party |
Merged into | Workers' Party |
Ideology | Socialism Communism[b] |
Political position | Left-wing[c] |
Colours | Sky Blue Red |
Party flag | |
![]() | |
Barisan Sosialis (BS), also known as the Socialist Front, is a defunct
As the PAP consolidated its power during the 1960s, it cracked down on BS, accusing it of pro-
Background
Since its formation, the PAP was divided into the
On 27 May 1961, Tunku Abdul Rahman, Prime Minister of the Federation of Malaya, suggested the creation of a new Malaysia state consisting of the Federation of Malaya, Singapore, Sarawak, North Borneo and Brunei. The reactions towards merger within the PAP were divided. The merger with Malaysia was supported by the Lee Kuan Yew camp as a means of assuring Singapore's future security and prosperity, while opposed by the left-wing camp as the merger was seen as an attempt to "wipe out the left-wing forces in Singapore" (Interview with Dr Lee Siew Choh).[6]
The rupture within the PAP was widened by the Hong Lim and Anson By-Elections in 1961. Displeased with the PAP government's refusal to abolish the Internal Security Council (ISC), refusal to back down the merger plan and refusal to release the remaining political detainees, the PAP left-wingers abandoned support for their own candidates in favour of Ong Eng Guan (in Hong Lim) and David Marshall (in Anson), which led to the PAP's defeat in the two by-elections.
After the Anson by-election, the left-wing camp planned to oust Lee Kuan Yew from the party but they worried that their actions would cause the British to hold up plans for Singapore's independence. As a result, the left-wingers had a meeting with Lord Selkirk, the British Commissioner-General at Eden Hall, which was later known as the "Eden Hall Tea Party". At the meeting, the left got assurance from Selkirk that Britain was committed to independence and would not intervene militarily to maintain control after the overthrow of Lee Kuan Yew's government.[7][8]
Formation
On 20 July 1961, Lee Kuan Yew called an emergency meeting of the Legislative Assembly to vote on a
BS was officially inaugurated on 17 September 1962, with Lim Chin Siong as its secretary-general and Dr Lee Siew Choh as chairman. Its founding slogan was 'genuinely full internal self-government' through merger with Malaya[7] and it shared the same aim with the PAP-'the creation of an independent, democratic, non-communist, socialist Malaya'.[9] The main objectives of the new party were presented in following four statements:[10]
- To eradicate colonialism and set up a united national independent state comprising the Federation of Malaya and Singapore
- To establish a democratic Government of Malaya based on universal adult suffrage of all those who are born in or owe their allegiance to Malaya
- To bring into being an economic system that will endure a prosperous, stable and just society
- To mobilise all sections of the people for the building of a Malayan nation
Merger issue
While BS didn't oppose the merger with Malaya, the party campaigned vigorously against the PAP government's merger terms with the Federation of Malaya. According to the merger terms agreed by the PAP government, Singapore would retain its autonomy in education and labour at the expense of the rights of Singapore citizens and seats in the new Federal Parliament. The Barisan Socialis wanted the Singapore citizens to automatically become Malayan citizens with proportional representation in the Federal Parliament.[5] At the end, the PAP government advocated that a referendum should be held to test popular support for the merger. The Referendum Bill on the merger incorporated proposals and amendments from BS, David Marshall, Ong Eng Guan and SPA-UMNO.[10] Three offered options A, B, C respectively proposed by the PAP, David Marshall and the SPA-UMNO. However, BS appealed to voters to cast blank votes on the referendum stating that no option correctly expressed BS's thoughts and the three options would "sell out Singapore".[6] This move had been anticipated by the PAP government; a clause had been inserted within the Referendum Ordinance stating that voters who cast blank votes were unable to make a decision themselves and they must necessarily follow the majority. That is, the blank votes would be automatically counted together with whichever of the options that won the majority. The Referendum on Merger was held on 1 September 1962, and the results were:[10]
- Option (A): 397,626 votes (71%)
- Option (B): 9,422 votes (1.7%)
- Option (C): 7,911 votes (1.4%)
- Blank votes: 144,077 votes (25%)
Option A won the majority, with BS defeated.
Reasons for decline
Operation Coldstore
On 2 February 1963, the
Operation Coldstore almost paralysed BS because of the detention of its major leaders including Lim Chin Siong. However, remaining BS leaders did not give up their struggle. On 22 April 1963, Lee Siew Choh and remaining BS activists launched the "City Hall Battle". They marched from the BS's headquarter in Victoria Street to the steps of City Hall to protest the mass arrests in February and presented a petition to the Prime Minister in protest against the 'ill treatment' of the detainees.[10] The protest was put down and seven party leaders including Lee Siew Choh were arrested.[6]
1963 general election
After Operation Coldstore and ensuing protests, major cadres of BS were detained or put on long trials. These events severely diminished the strength of BS, which prevented the party from effectively taking part in the 1963 general elections, and the party was eventually defeated in the elections. The 1963 elections ended with a clear victory of PAP winning thirty-seven of the fifty-one seats. BS won thirteen, and the remaining seat fell to Ong Eng Guan who contested under the banner of the United People's Party.[6]
After the elections, the Malaysian Government took a series of actions to further debilitate BS. On Malaysia Day on 16 September 1963, the security authorities decided to launch two further crackdowns on the "left-wing" extremists. In those September and October operations, "some fifteen leaders of the Communist United Front" were rounded up.[6] Some student activists from Nanyang University were soon arrested for alleged subversive activities. In late August 1963, seven trade unions under Singapore Association of Trade Unions (SATU) controlled by the BS, were served notices by the Government to show cause why they should not be deregistered. On 30 October, the seven unions which were supposed to close down were eventually struck off the register.[5] In October, the government dissolved two of BS's most effective ancillary associations, The Singapore Rural Residents' Association and Singapore Country People's Association.[6]
Intra-party strife
National Service
Soon after Malaysia was formed, alarmed by Indonesia's confrontation and rebel activities in the Borneo territories, the central parliament in
Singapore's separation from Malaysia
BS had fought against the merger with Malaysia, however, upon the declaration of Singapore's independence from Malaysia in 1965, leaders of BS declined to recognise the independence of Singapore. Lee Siew Choh, chairman of BS attacked the independence obtained by Singapore, stating that it was not genuine and released public slogans of "Crush Malaysia", "Phony Independence", and "Boycott Parliament".[6] Reaction towards Singapore's independence within the left-wing camp was again divided. Lim Huan Boon, who was a member of the Communist Party of Malaya and one of BS's representatives in the Legislative Assembly recognised the independence of Singapore stating that there was no such thing as phony or half independence.[5] Lim Chin Siong, another leader of BS who was in detention, also considered Singapore's independence to be genuine.
Taking the view that there was neither true national independence nor parliamentary democracy, BS began to boycott Parliament and elections.[10] In October 1966, BS had all its remaining representatives in Parliament resign their seats and started what they called an extra-parliamentary struggle.[5] An editorial in The Straits Times commented that BS chose the wrong time to launch an extra-parliamentary struggle:
"To give up the constitutional arena, at a time when none other exists, is very much like giving up politics altogether".[6]
The departure from the parliament arguably sealed the fate of BS.
Final days
By 1967, BS had been depleted and its declining fortunes was seen in the contraction of its membership. Within three years from 1963 to 1966, the number of its branches had shrunk to 33 from 36 with only 22 effective. In contrast, the PAP maintained its 51 branches throughout the three years.[5] BS boycotted the General Elections in 1968 and allowed the PAP to win all 51 seats in the Parliament.[11][12]
BS returned to contest the
Communist allegations
From the perspective of the PAP government, BS was a "communist-controlled organisation" closely affiliated with he
Although admitting that they adopted Communist tactics for the anti-colonial cause because, at the time, such tactics would gather mass support, Lim Chin Siong refuted the Communist label attached to him and BS. He claimed:
"Let me make it clear, once and for all, that I am not a Communist, or a Communist front-man, or, for that matter, anybody's front-man."[6]
"I was an MBA League member, but that doesn't mean that I was a communist...MBA is far from MCP...Study the Manifesto of the PA; it was more anti-colonial and more communist in doctrine...Of course during that time, the largest surviving party in Malaya was MCP and PAP was relatively new, so it was inevitable the thinking was influenced by communism." (Interview with Lim Chin Siong)[6]
It may have been possible that BS was merely inspired by successful Communist movements elsewhere to end colonialism and to mobilise the masses, and there is uncertainty about whether BS was actually Communist controlled or not.
"It is not clear whether BS is merely a front for the Communist Party and its executive in Singapore, the Town Committee, or whether it is a party which is willing to accept Communist support, though the ultimate objective did not call for the creation of a Communist political system nor the establishment of a beachhead for the Chinese People's Republic."[14]
Election results
Legislative Assembly
Election | Leader | Votes | % | Swing | Seats | Position | Result | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contested | Total | +/– | |||||||||
Seats | Won | Lost | |||||||||
1963 | Chia Thye Poh | 193,301 | 33.24% | — | 46 | 13 | 33 | 13 / 51
|
![]() |
![]() |
Opposition |
Parliament
Election | Leader | Votes | % | Swing | Seats | Position | Result | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contested | Total | +/– | |||||||||
Seats | Won | Lost | |||||||||
1968 | Lee Siew Choh | Boycott of election | 0 / 58
|
![]() |
— | — | |||||
1972 | 34,483 | 4.63% | ![]() |
10 | 0 | 10 | 0 / 65
|
![]() |
![]() |
No seats | |
1976 | 25,411 | 3.19% | ![]() |
6 | 0 | 6 | 0 / 69
|
![]() |
![]() |
No seats | |
1980 | 16,488 | 2.59% | ![]() |
4 | 0 | 4 | 0 / 75
|
![]() |
![]() |
No seats | |
1984 | 24,212 | 2.76% | ![]() |
4 | 0 | 4 | 0 / 79
|
![]() |
![]() |
No seats |
Seats Contested
Election | Constituency contested | Contested Vote[15] | Swing |
---|---|---|---|
1963 | Aljunied, Anson, Bras Basah, Bukit Merah, Bukit Panjang, Bukit Timah, Cairnhill, Changi, Chua Chu Kang, Crawford, Delta, Farrer Park, Geylang East, Geylang West, Havelock, Hong Lim, Jalan Besar, Jalan Kayu, Joo Chiat, Jurong, Kallang, Kampong Glam, Kampong Kapor, Kretar Ayer, Moulmein, Mountbatten, Nee Soon, Pasir Panjang, Payer Lebar, Punggol, Queenstown, River Valley, Rochore, Sembawang, Sepoy Lines, Serangoon Gardens, Stamford, Tampines, Tanglin, Tanjong Pagar, Telok Ayer, Telok Blangah, Thomson, Tiong Bahru, Toa Payoh, Upper Serangoon | 37.1% | — |
1972 | Bukit Ho Swee, Bukit Merah, Bukit Timah, Chua Chu Kang, Delta, Havelock, Kampong Chai Chee, Kuo Chuan, Rochore, Toa Payoh | 26.6% | ![]() |
1976 | Boon Teck, Khe Bong, Kim Keat, Kuo Chuan, Rochore, Toa Payoh | 27.1% | ![]() |
1980 | Boon Teck, Khe Bong, Kuo Chuan, Toa Payoh | 27.0% | ![]() |
1984 | Boon Teck, Khe Bong, Kuo Chuan, Toa Payoh | 38.2% | ![]() |
Notes
References
- ^ "Barisan Sosialis Adopted Red Star Symbol". The Straits Times. 1961.
- .
- ^ Turnbull, C. M.(1977). A history of Singapore, 1819–1975. Singapore: Oxford University Press.
- ^ Thum, P (2013). "'The Fundamental Issue is Anti-colonialism, Not Merger': Singapore's" progressive Left", Operation Coldstore, and the Creation of Malaysia" (Document). Asia Research Institute, National University of Singapore, Working Paper Series No.211. p.7.
- ^ a b c d e f g Lee, T. H. (1996). The Open United Front: The Communist Struggle in Singapore, 1954–1966. Singapore: South Seas Society.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Mutalib, H (2003). Parties and politics: a study of opposition parties and PAP in Singapore. Eastern Univ Pr.
- ^ a b c d Quee, T. J. & Jomo, K. S. (2001). Comet in Our Sky: Lim Chin Siong in History. Kuala Lumpur: Insan.
- ^ Corfield, J (2010). Historical dictionary of Singapore. Scarecrow Press.
- ^ a b Bloodworth, D (1986). The Tiger and the Trojan Horse. Singapore: Times Books International.
- ^ a b c d e Fong, S. C. (1980). The PAP story—The pioneering years (November 1954 – April 1968). Singapore:Times Periodicals.
- ^ "Barisan starts its 'Don't vote' campaign". The Straits Budget. 21 February 1968. p. 13. Retrieved 26 March 2024 – via NewspaperSG.
- ^ "The Clean Sweep". The Straits Times. 15 April 1968. p. 10. Retrieved 26 March 2024 – via NewspaperSG.
- ^ Lee Kuan Yew (1961). The Battle for Merger. Singapore:Government Printing Office.
- ^ Bellows, Thomas J (1970). The People's Action Party of Singapore:The Emergence of a Dominant Party System. Yale University:Southeast Asia Studies, Monograph Series No.14.
- ^ "Singapore Elections".