Massacre of the Latins
Massacre of the Latins | |
---|---|
Eastern Christian mob |
![]() |
Part of a series on |
Persecutions of the Catholic Church |
---|
Catholicism portal |
The Massacre of the Latins
The Catholics of Constantinople at that time dominated the city's
The massacre further worsened relations and increased enmity between the
Background
From the late 11th century, Western merchants, primarily from the
Alexios' grandson, Manuel I Komnenos, wishing to reduce their influence, began to reduce the privileges of Venice while concluding agreements with her rivals: Pisa, Genoa, and Amalfi.[8] Gradually, all four Italian cities were also allowed to establish their own quarters in the northern part of Constantinople itself, towards the Golden Horn.
The predominance of the Italian merchants caused economic and social upheaval in Byzantium: it accelerated the decline of the independent native merchants in favour of big exporters, who became tied to the
The religious differences between the two sides, who viewed each other as schismatics, further exacerbated the problem. The Italians proved uncontrollable by imperial authority: in 1162, for instance, the Pisans together with a few Venetians raided the Genoese quarter in Constantinople, causing much damage.[2] Emperor Manuel subsequently expelled most of the Genoese and Pisans from the city, thus giving the Venetians a free hand for several years.[9]
In early 1171, however, when the Venetians attacked and largely destroyed the Genoese quarter in Constantinople, the Emperor retaliated by ordering the mass arrest of all Venetians throughout the Empire and the confiscation of their property. There were also mass rapes and the burning of houses. A subsequent Venetian expedition in the Aegean failed: a direct assault was impossible due to the strength of the imperial forces, and the Venetians agreed to negotiations, which the Emperor stalled intentionally. As talks dragged on through the winter, the Venetian fleet waited at Chios, until an outbreak of the plague forced them to withdraw.[10]
The Venetians and the Empire remained at war, with the Venetians prudently avoiding direct confrontation but sponsoring Serb uprisings, besieging
Death of Manuel I and massacre
Following the death of Manuel I in 1180, his widow, the Latin princess Maria of Antioch, acted as regent to her infant son Alexios II Komnenos. Her regency was notorious for the favoritism shown to Latin merchants and the big aristocratic land-owners, and was overthrown in April 1182 by Andronikos I Komnenos, who entered the city with a wave of popular support.[2][14] Almost immediately, the celebrations spilled over into violence towards the hated Latins, and after entering the city's Latin quarter, a mob began attacking the inhabitants.[6]
Many had anticipated the events and escaped by sea.[4] The ensuing massacre was indiscriminate: neither women nor children were spared, and Latin patients lying in hospital beds were murdered.[6] Houses, churches, and charities were looted.[6] Latin clergymen received special attention, and Cardinal John, the papal legate, was beheaded and his head was dragged through the streets at the tail of a dog.[4][15]
Although Andronikos himself had no particular anti-Latin attitude, he allowed the massacre to proceed unchecked.[16] Andronikos had managed to incite the anti-Latin sentiment of Constantinopolitans, on the grounds that the empress and the protosebastos had bought Latin support by promising them the chance of plundering the city.[17]
During the massacre Empress Maria was put under house arrest, before eventually being executed.
Impact
The massacre further worsened the reputation of the Byzantines in the West, and although regular trade agreements soon resumed between Byzantium and Latin states, the underlying animosity would remain, leading to a spiraling chain of hostilities: a Sicilian expedition under William II of Sicily in 1185 sacked Thessalonica, the Empire's second largest city, and the German emperors Frederick Barbarossa and Henry VI both threatened to attack Constantinople.[18]
The worsening relationship culminated with the brutal
The Italian-born translator and Byzantine chancery official Leo Tuscus was among the Latins who survived the massacre.[19]
See also
References
- ^ (Italian: Massacro dei Latini; Greek: Σφαγὴ τῶν Λατίνων, lit. 'Sfagí tón Latínon')
- ^ a b c d e f g h Ducellier 1986, pp. 506–508.
- ISBN 978-1-4051-8471-7.
- ^ a b c Nicol 1988, p. 107.
- )
- ^ )
- ISBN 90-04-11710-5 – via Internet Archive.
- ^ Nicol 1988, p. 94.
- ^ Nicol 1988, p. 95.
- ^ Nicol 1988, pp. 97–99.
- ^ Nicol 1988, p. 100.
- ^ Nicol 1988, p. 101.
- ISBN 978-0-8018-7317-1 – via Internet Archive.
- ^ Nicol 1988, p. 106.
- ^ a b Carroll, Warren (1993). The Glory of Christendom, Front Royal, VA: Christendom Press, pp. 157, 131
- ISBN 978-1-85285-501-7, pp. 111-112
- ISBN 0-415-14688-7 – via Internet Archive.
- ^ Fine 1994, p. 60.
- ISBN 978-8-81200032-6.
Sources
- Ducellier, Alain (1986). "The death throes of Byzantium: 1080–1261". The Cambridge Illustrated History of the Middle Ages: 950-1250. Cambridge University Press. pp. 489–524. ISBN 978-0-521-26645-1 – via Internet Archive.
- OCLC 749133662.
- ISBN 0-521-34157-4.