Pseudotranslation in The Lord of the Rings

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

A

found manuscript conceit to frame his story
.

Effectively, he pretends to be an editor and translator who has received an ancient manuscript, the

Rohirric. The latter meaning is the actual sense of the Old English word, making the multiple homonymy and synonymy
implausible.

Aspects of the pseudotranslation make actual

Rohirric, an archaic language, which is represented by Old English, and the language of Dale, translated as Old Norse. The three real languages are related. Thomas Honegger
gives possible solutions that begin to handle this in French and German, but suggests that the small amount of Old English is probably best left untranslated.

Context

Further information: Philology and Middle-earth and Pseudotranslation

From his schooldays,

Houghton Mifflin that this was meant to imply that his work was "all of a piece, and fundamentally linguistic in inspiration. ... The invention of languages is the foundation. The 'stories' were made rather to provide a world for the languages than the reverse. To me a name comes first and the story follows."[T 1]

A

Cervantes in his 1605 Don Quixote.[2]

An accidental trap

In his 1937 children's book

dwarf, while the name "Oakenshield" (Eikinskjaldi) is in stanza 13.[4][5]

Tolkien borrowed Old Norse Dwarf-names for The Hobbit [4]
Dvergatal
 Translation (borrowed names in bold)

11.... Nár ok Náinn Nípingr, Dáinn
Bívurr, Bávurr, Bömburr, Nóri,
...
12. "Veggr ok Gandalfr, Vindalfr, Þorinn,
Þrár ok Þráinn, Þekkr, Litr ok Vitr,

11.... Nar and Nain, | Niping,

Dain
,
Bifur, Bofur, | Bombur, Nori,
...
12. Vigg and Gandalf | Vindalf, Thorin,
Thror and Thrain | Thekk, Lit and Vit,

The use of Norse names was left unexplained in The Hobbit, but when Dwarves reappeared in The Lord of the Rings, it presented an immediate problem: the Dwarves would have had names in their own language, Khuzdul. Tolkien needed to find a solution that would make names in Norse and Khuzdul – one real language, one invented – coexist.[6]

A solution

Deciding on pseudotranslation

When writing The Lord of the Rings (1954–55), a sequel to The Hobbit, Tolkien came up with the literary device of pseudotranslation, using real languages to "translate" fictional languages.[7] He pretended to have translated the original language Westron (named Adûni in Westron) or Common Speech (Sôval Phârë, in Westron) into English.[3]

In a 1954 letter, Tolkien stated that the pseudotranslation issue "has given me much thought. It seems seldom regarded by other creators of imaginary worlds, however gifted as narrators (such as Eddison). But then I am a philologist".[T 2] He then stated that "English cannot have been the language of any people of that time",[T 2] and explained his pseudotranslation process:[8] "What I have, in fact done, is to equate the Westron or wide-spread Common Speech of the Third Age with English; and translate everything, including names such as The Shire, that was in the Westron into English terms".[T 2]

In Appendix F II "On Translation", Tolkien wrote that "The Westron names were as a rule translations of older names: as Rivendell, Hoarwell,

Silverlode, Langstrand". He went on to explain why he had done this:[T 3]

[I wished to preserve] the contrast between a wide-spread language... and the living remains of far older and more reverend tongues. All names if merely transcribed would seem to modern readers equally remote: for instance, if the Elvish name Imladris and the Westron translation Karningul had both been left unchanged.[T 3]

Winchester as Camelot: interior of the Great Hall of Winchester Castle, with what has been claimed to be King Arthur's Round Table

Tolkien gave as a picture of the reason for this approach a sentence mapping Middle-earth to the real world, though with the inclusion of the semi-mythical figure of King Arthur:[T 3]

But to refer to Rivendell as Imladris was as if one now was to speak of Winchester as Camelot, except that the identity was certain, while in Rivendell there still dwelt a lord of renown far older than Arthur would be, were he still king at Winchester today.[T 3]

Allan Turner remarks that this further blurs the already confused distinction between fiction and reality:[9]

Turner's analysis of Tolkien's pseudotranslation analogy[T 3][9]
Attribute The Lord of the Rings Analogy
Place Rivendell Winchester
Located in Fictional Middle-earth England
In language English, representing
Westron
 English
Formerly called Imladris Camelot
Former language Sindarin
Medieval French
In time An earlier age of Middle-earth Mythical version of England
Led by Elrond King Arthur
Status A living
War of the Ring
, in the fiction		 A long-dead King of men,
according to legend

Complex implications

The device of rendering an imaginary language with a real one was carried further by rendering:[3]

Tolkien wrote: "Languages, however, that were related to the Westron presented a special problem. I turned them into forms of speech related to English. Since the Rohirrim are represented as recent comers out of the North, and users of an archaic Mannish language relatively untouched by the influence of

Eldarin, I have turned their names into forms like ... Old English."[T 2][8]

  • Tolkien accidentally created a linguistic puzzle by using three different pseudo-translated Germanic languages for peoples in his story.[10]
    Tolkien accidentally created a linguistic puzzle by using three different pseudo-translated Germanic languages for peoples in his story.[10]

Furthermore, to parallel the

Meriadoc for Kalimac).[T 3] The device of linguistic mapping allowed Tolkien to avoid having to invent new names in Khuzdul for all his Dwarves, while simultaneously explaining the book's use of Modern English for Westron.[6] Further, it saved him from having to work out the details of Westron grammar or vocabulary in any detail. He does give some examples of Westron words in Appendix F II to The Lord of the Rings, where he summarizes its origin and role as Middle-earth's lingua franca:[T 3][11]

The language represented in this history by English was the Westron or 'Common Speech' of the West-lands of Middle-earth in the Third Age. In the course of that age it had become the native language of nearly all the speaking-peoples (save the Elves) who dwelt within the bounds of the old kingdoms of Arnor and Gondor ... At the time of the War of the Ring at the end of the age these were still its bounds as a native tongue. (Appendix F)[T 3]

Rohirric is represented in The Lord of the Rings by Old English because Tolkien chose to make the relationship between Rohirric and the Common Speech similar to that of Old English and Modern English.[T 4]

  • Tolkien uses the mapping of Old English to Modern English to represent the mapping of Rohirric to Westron.[T 4]
    Tolkien uses the mapping of Old English to Modern English to represent the mapping of Rohirric to Westron.[T 4]

This solution makes the combination of languages in the book exceptionally complex, presenting a substantial challenge to those translating The Lord of the Rings into other languages.[12][13]

Thomas Honegger suggests how the language nexus might be translated into French:[14]

Honegger's proposal for translating the language nexus into French[14]
Middle-earth language Language for French translations Notes
Of the Shire
Modern French
 lingua franca spoken across Middle-earth except by "a few secluded folk" as in Lothlórien (and "little and ill by Orcs")
Of
Dale
 Picard "used by Dwarves of that region"
Of Rohan Medieval Vulgar Latin ancestor of French

Honegger notes that while this type of solution works linguistically, it cannot hope to capture cultural aspects. The people of Rohan, the Rohirrim, speak a Mercian dialect of Old English, and their culture is Anglo-Saxon, despite Tolkien's denial of this in "On Translation". Medieval Latin does nothing to suggest Mercian Anglo-Saxon culture. Honegger suggests that in consequence, the best answer is probably to leave the Old English names and quoted speech untranslated, noting that Tolkien's "Guide to the Names" seems to concur with this approach.[14]

Lost in translation

Multiple homonyms

Tolkien stated in

Robert Foster notes that orþanc genuinely does mean "cunning" in Old English, so that the homonym Tolkien had in mind was between Sindarin and Old English, that is, translated or represented Rohirric. Foster comments that since it would be unlikely for a homonym also to exist between these two languages and actual Rohirric, and for the Old English and the Rohirric to be synonyms as well, Tolkien had made an error.[15]

  • In The Two Towers, Tolkien said Orthanc had meanings in Sindarin and Rohirric; but it is also a synonym and homonym in Old English, making Tolkien's claim look like a mistake.[15]
    In
    Rohirric; but it is also a synonym and homonym in Old English, making Tolkien's claim look like a mistake.[15]

Multilingual inscription

In The Fellowship of the Ring, the company find Balin's tomb as they cross Moria on their quest.[T 6] The tomb is inscribed in Dwarf runes. Transliterated into Latin characters, this is seen to be a mixture of Old Norse names, Khuzdul, English, and a pejorative name in the Elvish language Sindarin, all written together as a doubled runic inscription. English, as the real-world language into which Westron was purportedly translated, could not exist in Middle-earth.[16]

Languages used in Balin's tomb inscription
Inscription Transcribed inscription Notes[16]

BALIN

FUNdINUL

UZBADKhAZADDÛMU

BALIN SƏN OV FUNDIN LORD OV MORIA

English name in Norse style, translation of a name in Khuzdul

Old Norse name, with Khuzdul -ul "son of" ending

Khuzdul phrase "Lord of Dwarrowdelf"

English phrase, with pejorative Sindarin name for Khazad-dûm

Supporting the frame story

Main article: Editorial framing of The Lord of the Rings

A second reason for Tolkien to make use of pseudotranslation was to lend realism by supporting a

found manuscript conceit; this in turn strengthened and lent consistency to the philological way Tolkien had chosen to frame his story.[9] Tolkien used a frame story, embedded within the text, to make the story appear to have been written and edited by many hands over a long period of time. He described in detail how Bilbo and Frodo Baggins wrote their memoirs, transmitted them to others as the Red Book of Westmarch, and showed how later in-universe editors annotated the material.[17] Tolkien then appears not as the book's author but as editor and translator, the text as a survival through long ages, and the events depicted as historical.[17][18] Catherine Butler comments that this was "congenial work" which "suited the philological Tolkien with his many medieval documents".[19]

Found manuscript and pseudotranslation supporting Tolkien's frame story[17][18]
Time Events Notes
Third Age The quest of
War of the Ring
 Pseudo-history conceit
The Hobbit
Further pseudo-history
Fourth Age Frodo Baggins writes his memoirs in Westron.
Others annotate the memoirs: the Red Book of Westmarch.
Found manuscript
conceit
Fifth Age ... more editing by more hands ... Pseudo-editor conceit
Sixth/Seventh Age The Tolkien 'editor' "translates" the found manuscript into English (and a little Old Norse and Old English) Pseudo-translator conceit

See also

References

Primary

  1. Houghton Mifflin
    , 30 June 1955
  2. ^ a b c d Carpenter 2023, #144 to Naomi Mitchison, 25 April 1954
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h Tolkien 1955, Appendix F II, "On Translation"
  4. ^ a b Tolkien 2001, p. 8
  5. ^ Tolkien 1954, Book 3, chapter 8 "The Road to Isengard"
  6. ^ Tolkien 1954a, Book 2, chapter 5 "The Bridge of Khazad-dûm"

Secondary

  1. ^ Garth 2003, p. 16.
  2. ISBN 0936388072
    .
  3. ^ a b c d e f Shippey 2005, pp. 131–133.
  4. ^ a b Evans 2013b, pp. 134–135.
  5. ^ Rateliff 2007, Volume 2 Return to Bag-End, Appendix 3
  6. ^ a b Fimi 2010, pp. 189–191.
  7. ^ Turner 2007, p. 330.
  8. ^ a b Brljak 2010, pp. 1–34.
  9. ^ a b c Turner 2011a, p. 18.
  10. ^ Shippey 2005, pp. 131–133
  11. ^ Hemmi 2010, pp. 147–174.
  12. ^ Smith 2006, pp. 228–231, citing Turner 2005, "Philology and archaism"
  13. ^ Honegger 2011b, pp. 1–18.
  14. ^ a b c Honegger 2011b, p. 14.
  15. ^ a b Fimi 2010, pp. 191–192.
  16. ^ a b Kales, Josef (2010). "Appendix C: The Inscription on Balin's Tomb in Moria". Usage and meaning of extinct Germanic languages in the novels of JRR Tolkien (PDF). Charles University, Prague (thesis).
  17. ^ a b c Flieger 2005, pp. 67–73 "A great big book with red and black letters"
  18. ^ a b Turner 2011a, pp. 18–21.
  19. ^ Butler 2013, pp. 108–111.

Sources

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pseudotranslation_in_The_Lord_of_the_Rings&oldid=1228661218"