Siege of Arrah
Siege of Arrah | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Part of the Indian Rebellion of 1857 | |||||||
Defence of the Arrah House, 1857 (1858) by William Tayler | |||||||
| |||||||
Belligerents | |||||||
East India Company United Kingdom |
Jagdishpur estate Mutinying Sepoys | ||||||
Commanders and leaders | |||||||
Herwald Wake Hooken Singh Charles Dunbar † Vincent Eyre |
Kunwar Singh Babu Amar Singh Hare Krishna Singh[1] | ||||||
Strength | |||||||
Besieged party: 68 First relief: 400 Second relief: 225 |
Mutinying Sepoys: 2,500 – 3,000 Kunwar Singh's forces: 8,000 (Estimated) | ||||||
Casualties and losses | |||||||
Besieged party: 1 wounded First relief: 170 killed 120 wounded Second relief: 2 killed | Unknown | ||||||
The siege of Arrah (27 July – 3 August 1857) took place during the Indian Mutiny (also known as the Indian Rebellion of 1857). It was the eight-day defence of a fortified outbuilding, occupied by a combination of 18 civilians and 50 members of the Bengal Military Police Battalion, against 2,500 to 3,000 mutinying Bengal Native Infantry sepoys from three regiments and an estimated 8,000 men from irregular forces commanded by Kunwar Singh, the local zamindar or chieftain who controlled the Jagdishpur estate.
An attempt to break the siege failed, with around 290 casualties out of around 415 men in the relief party. Shortly afterwards, a second relief effort consisting of 225 men and three artillery guns—carried out despite specific orders that it should not take place—dispersed the forces surrounding the building, suffering two casualties, and the besieged party escaped. Only one member of the besieged group was injured.
Background
On 10 May 1857, a
On 8 June, a letter arrived from
Following a suggestion from Wake,
Battle
The siege
Around 25 mi (40 km) east of Arrah, the 7th, 8th and 40th Regiments of Bengal Native Infantry were stationed in Dinapore, alongside the British Army's 10th and 37th Regiments of Foot. Throughout June, Tayler received anonymous letters warning him about the conduct of the sepoys, and he was informed that large sums of money were being distributed to the sepoys for unknown reasons.[26] Tayler also ordered the interception of all mail being sent to and from the three regiments,[27] leading to the discovery of plotters within Dinapore and nearby Patna who were then jailed.[28] Discussions had taken place between Tayler and his superiors about disarming the three regiments of Bengal Native Infantry stationed in Dinapore, and Governor-General Charles Canning delegated responsibility for the decision to Major General George Lloyd, military commander of the Dinapore division.[9] Instead of disarming the regiments, on the morning of 25 July Lloyd ordered the sepoys to hand in their percussion caps at 4:00 pm that day.[29] The 7th and 8th Regiments refused and fired on their officers. The 10th and 37th Regiments of Foot, also stationed in Dinapore, then opened fire on the mutineers. The 40th Regiment of Bengal Native Infantry, who had begun to comply with Lloyd's order, were also fired on in the confusion.[30] All three regiments of Bengal Native Infantry then left Dinapore heading toward Arrah. At the outbreak of the disturbance, Lloyd could not be located; by the time he was found aboard a river steamboat and orders were given to apprehend the mutineers, they were too far away to be caught. Lloyd, believing that his forces should remain in place to defend Dinapore, refused to order the pursuit of the mutineers.[31]
On the evening of 25 July, information arrived at Arrah that a disturbance was to be expected in the district. Wake had been told by a railway engineer stationed nearby that the boats used to cross the
Over the following seven days the besieged party faced constant musket fire, with fire from two artillery pieces after 28 July. When the party began to run out of water on 29 July, sepoys sneaked out of the building during the night, stole tools from their opponents and dug an 18 ft (5.5 m) well in about 12 hours.[37] When food began to run out, a small group was able to sneak out of the building on the afternoon of 30 July and return with some sheep that had been grazing within the compound.[38] Although an attempt was made to smoke the men out of the house by making a large fire of furniture and chilli peppers, a last-minute shift in wind direction blew the smoke away from the house.[39] Every evening, a voice loudly invited the Sikh sepoys in the house to slaughter the Europeans and join the mutineers, offering them 500 rupees each; it was met at first with sarcasm, and later by gunfire from the building.[40] The mutineers and rebel forces did not attempt another charge on the building, although its occupants expected an attack at any moment during the siege.[32]
First relief attempt
News reached Dinapore on 27 July that mutinying sepoys had attacked Arrah. General Lloyd was still unwilling to send troops to pursue the mutineers until he was persuaded to do so by pressure from magistrates, who were personal friends of the besieged party, and Tayler in his role as the Commissioner of Patna.[41] A party of 200 from the 37th Regiment of Foot, 50 from the Bengal Military Police Battalion and 15 loyal Sikhs from regiments that had mutinied, were sent, aboard the river steamer Horungotta,[42] to rescue the town's civil servants. News arrived in Dinapore the following day that the steamer was aground on a sandbank, and Lloyd ordered the party recalled. Under pressure from local government officials, he changed his mind and agreed to send, using the river steamer Bombay,[42] a large force of the 10th Regiment of Foot under Lieutenant Colonel William Fenwick[43] to join up with the party on the first steamer and head to Arrah. Bombay already had a large complement of civilian passengers and attempts to have the passengers removed met with confusion and arguments with the captain of the steamer, causing a delay of around four hours.[44] As a result, only a reduced force of about 150 (including seven civilian volunteers) was able to embark. Fenwick, unwilling to carry out the mission with only 150 men, delegated its command to Captain Charles Dunbar[45] (who worked in the paymaster's bureau[46]) and Bombay departed on 29 July at around 9:30 am. The two steamers met up, and the combined force of about 415 then headed towards Arrah.[47]
The expedition arrived at a place called Beharee Ghat on the western bank of the Son River and disembarked at about 4:00 pm.[48] Their path was then blocked by a large stream that could only be crossed using boats.[48] The party took three hours to cross the stream and head inland. After the expedition had marched 4 mi (6.4 km), Dunbar halted them 3 mi (4.8 km) from Arrah for one hour to see if his supplies would catch up to him. When the supplies did not arrive, he ordered the expedition to press on, despite warnings from his subordinate officers of the danger of hungry, tired men marching through unfamiliar territory at night.[46] Up to this point in the expedition, Dunbar had sent skirmishers as scouts ahead of his main body of troops; he now decided not to do so and the men advanced in a single body.[46] As the party neared Arrah, they spotted men on horseback, whom they took to be vedettes (mounted sentries), that rode away as they approached. When the expedition was about 1 mi (1.6 km) from Arrah, its route passed through a thick grove of mango trees. As the expedition was almost through the grove, they were fired on from three sides by a force they estimated as 2,000 to 3,000 in number.[49] Heavy casualties were suffered during the initial ambush, including Dunbar (who was killed instantly), and the force broke up in confusion. The besieged party in Arrah heard the sound of gunfire, growing louder as the expedition approached them, then becoming more distant as the expedition retreated, and they immediately inferred that something must have gone wrong.[48] A wounded member of the Bengal Military Police Battalion who was part of Dunbar's force was able to avoid the mutinying sepoys surrounding Boyle's building. Pulled up into the building with a rope, he told its occupants about the ambush.[50]
During the retreat from Arrah, Ross Mangles and William Fraser McDonell (civilian magistrates, and personal friends of Wake, who had volunteered to serve with Dunbar's expedition) earned the Victoria Cross—Mangles, despite being wounded, carried a wounded soldier from the 37th Regiment of Foot for several miles while under fire,[51] and McDonnell exposed himself to heavy fire to cut a rope that was preventing a boat from making its escape, saving the lives of 35 soldiers.[52] The steamer carrying the expedition returned to Dinapore on 30 July, and families and friends were waiting at the dock expecting to welcome home the victorious men. When the steamer docked outside the hospital instead of at its usual berth, the spectators realised something was wrong. In the words of Tayler: "The scene that ensued was heart-rending, the soldiers' wives rushed down, screaming, to the edge of the water, beating their breasts and tearing their hair, despondency and despair were depicted on every countenance."[53] Out of 415 men, the expedition had suffered 170 fatalities and 120 wounded.[48]
Second attempt
Major Vincent Eyre, a Bengal Artillery officer in command of the East India Company's Number 1 Company, 4th Bengal Foot Artillery—now 58 (Eyre's) Battery, 12th Regiment Royal Artillery, British Army—then stationed in Buxar, was under orders to head to Cawnpore with his battery. He had heard news of the situation in Arrah and, unaware of any relief expedition, decided on his own to collect troops to reinforce the expedition he believed would take place. Finding no troops available at Buxar, Eyre went to Ghazipur and was able to attach 25 men from the 78th (Highlanders) Regiment of Foot to his party. Upon returning to Buxar, Eyre found that 154 men from the 5th Regiment of Foot had arrived in his absence and he convinced their commander, Captain L'Estrange, to join him with the understanding that Eyre bore full responsibility. At this point, Eyre felt so confident of victory that he dismissed the men from the 78th Foot and went ahead without them.[54] Unable to locate horses to move his battery's guns, Eyre used bullocks (neutered bulls) instead and was able to procure two elephants to move the party's baggage.[55] After assembling a force of 225 men (including civilian volunteers) and three of his battery's guns, Eyre wrote to General Lloyd at Dinapore informing him of his intentions and requesting reinforcements. On 30 July, at about 4:00 pm, Eyre's expedition started for Arrah.[56]
Lloyd's reply, informing Eyre of the failure of the first relief attempt and ordering him not to commence his mission, or to return to Buxar to await further orders if he had already started, arrived while the party was en route. Eyre disregarded Lloyd's order and continued towards Arrah.[57] On 2 August, still over 6 mi (9.7 km) from his objective, Eyre's force encountered an estimated 2,000 to 2,500 mutinying sepoys accompanied by Kunwar Singh's forces—including Kunwar Singh himself—headed to intercept him.[32] Greatly outnumbered, Eyre's party became surrounded. He then ordered the infantry to charge with bayonets and the artillery to fire on the mutineers. This caused the mutinying sepoys to retreat, with an estimated 600 casualties.[58] Eyre's party, with only two killed,[32] then continued towards Arrah. Blocked by a river, they built a bridge which they completed the following day. When they crossed the river on the morning of 3 August, a villager gave them a letter from Wake telling them that the besieged men had heard about their approach, stating "We are all well."[58]
Throughout the day of 2 August the besieged party heard distant cannon fire and saw people in the town hurriedly loading carts with their belongings.[59] The constant fire from muskets on the building lessened and finally ceased; it was approached by two men, who told the occupants that the besiegers were defeated and a relief force was expected to arrive in Arrah the following day.[60] The occupants were sceptical, despite visual evidence, and sent out a small party at midnight to reconnoitre the area—they found no sign of the mutineers and brought in a large quantity of gunpowder and the mutineers' two artillery pieces. They then sent a party under cover of darkness to destroy a number of outhouses which the mutineers had been using as cover. This party discovered a mine dug directly under the foundations of the building by the mutineers, charged and ready to be primed, so this charge was destroyed by them. The following morning at about 7:00 am, two members of Major Eyre's expedition arrived at the house and the siege was officially broken.[61] Eyre, in his official report, wrote that Wake's defence of the building "seems to have been almost miraculous." About the outcome of the first relief attempt, he wrote: "I venture to affirm, confidently, that no such disaster would have been likely to occur, had that detachment advanced less precipitately, so as to have given full time for my force to approach direct from the opposite side, for the rebels would then have been hemmed in between the two opposing forces, and must have been utterly routed."[32]
According to Wake's official report about the siege, "Nothing but cowardice, want of unanimity, and only the ignorance of our enemies, prevented our fortification being brought down about our ears."[32] In his own report, Tayler wrote, "The conduct of the garrison is most creditable, and the gallantry and fidelity of the Sikhs beyond all praise."[32]
Awards
For their actions during the siege, Wake was made a Companion of the
Aftermath
Eyre, after receiving reinforcements, pursued Kunwar Singh's forces to Singh's palace in
The besieged building still stands on the grounds of Maharaja College, Arrah, where it now houses a museum commemorating the life of Kunwar Singh, although according to Abhay Kumar of the Deccan Herald, as of May 2015 it "hardly has any item related to Kunwar Singh."[69]
Legacy
After visiting the site in 1864, Trevelyan wrote:
Already the wall, on which Wake wrote the diary of the siege, has been whitewashed... a party-wall has been built over the mouth of the well in the cellars; and the garden-fence, which served the mutineers as a first parallel, has been moved twenty yards back. Half a century more, and every vestige of the struggle may have been swept away. But, as long as Englishmen love to hear of fidelity, and constancy, and courage bearing up the day against frightful odds, there is no fear lest they forget the name of "the little house at Arrah."[70]
References
Citations
- ^ Kalikinkar Datta (1957). Biography of Kunwar Singh and Amar Singh. K.P. Jayaswal Research Institute. p. 29.
- ^ Dodd 1859, pp. 48–58.
- ^ Sieveking 1910, pp. 18–19.
- ^ Halls 1860, p. 9.
- ^ Sieveking 1910, p. 18.
- ^ Halls 1860, pp. 9–10.
- ^ a b Sieveking 1910, p. 43.
- ^ Trevelyan 1864, p. 92.
- ^ a b Dodd 1859, p. 267.
- ^ a b Sieveking 1910, p. 19.
- ^ Sieveking 1910, p. 150.
- ^ a b Trevelyan 1864, p. 89.
- ^ a b Halls 1860, p. 33.
- ^ Sieveking 1910, pp. 19–20.
- ^ Trevelyan 1864, p. 90.
- ^ Sieveking 1910, p. 21.
- ^ a b c Sieveking 1910, p. 22.
- ^ a b Halls 1860, p. 14.
- ^ Boyle 1858, p. 7.
- ^ Halls 1860, p. 67.
- ^ a b Sieveking 1910, p. 25.
- ^ Boyle 1858, p. 8.
- ^ Halls 1860, p. 26.
- ^ Halls 1860, pp. 28–31.
- ^ Halls 1860, p. 34.
- ^ Tayler 1858, pp. 30–40.
- ^ Trevelyan 1864, p. 72.
- ^ Tayler 1858, pp. 39–40.
- ^ Trevelyan 1864, p. 84.
- ^ Forrest 2006, p. 417.
- ^ Sieveking 1910, p. 50.
- ^ a b c d e f g h "No. 22050". The London Gazette. 13 October 1857. pp. 3418–3422.
- ^ O'Malley 1906, p. 128.
- ^ Sieveking 1910, p. 28.
- ^ Sieveking 1910, p. 46.
- ^ Sieveking 1910, pp. 41–45.
- ^ Forrest 2006, p. 438.
- ^ Sieveking 1910, p. 44.
- ^ Sieveking 1910, pp. 30–31.
- ^ Trevelyan 1864, p. 93.
- ^ Tayler 1858, p. 78.
- ^ a b Dodd 1859, p. 270.
- ^ "No. 21714". The London Gazette. 18 May 1855. p. 1918.
- ^ Tayler 1858, pp. 79–81.
- ^ Best 2016, Patna.
- ^ a b c Trevelyan 1864, p. 94.
- ^ Sieveking 1910, pp. 51–53.
- ^ a b c d e f Dodd 1859, p. 271.
- ^ Sieveking 1910, p. 58.
- ^ Halls 1860, pp. 46–48.
- ^ "No. 22283". The London Gazette. 8 July 1859. p. 2629.
- ^ "No. 22357". The London Gazette. 17 February 1860. p. 557.
- ^ Tayler 1858, p. 83.
- ^ Forrest 2006, p. 448.
- ^ Sieveking 1910, p. 83.
- ^ Sieveking 1910, p. 81.
- ^ Sieveking 1910, p. 74.
- ^ a b Sieveking 1910, p. 90.
- ^ Trevelyan 1864, p. 109.
- ^ Halls 1860, pp. 52–53.
- ^ Halls 1860, p. 54.
- ^ "No. 22387". The London Gazette. 18 May 1860. p. 1916.
- The Montreal Gazette. 21 January 1908. p. 9. Retrieved 20 July 2016.
- ^ Singh 1993, p. 10.
- ^ Sieveking 1910, p. 80.
- ^ "No. 22069". The London Gazette. 4 December 1857. p. 4264.
- ^ Trevelyan 1864, pp. 91–92.
- ^ Prichard 1869, p. 43.
- ^ Kumar, Abhay (31 May 2015). "CJ's chance visit helps breathe life into Ara House". Deccan Herald. Archived from the original on 13 September 2017. Retrieved 20 July 2016.
- ^ Trevelyan 1864, p. 111.
Sources
- Best, Brian (2016). The Victoria Crosses that Saved an Empire: The Story of the VCs of the Indian Mutiny. Barnsley: Frontline Books. ISBN 978-1-4738-5707-0.
- Boyle, Richard Vicars (1858). Indian Mutiny, Brief Narrative of the Defence of the Arrah Garrison. London: W. Thacker & Co. OCLC 794643208.
- Dodd, George (1859). The History of the Indian Revolt and of the Expeditions to Persia, China, and Japan, 1856–7–8: With Maps, Plans, and Wood Engravings. London: W. and R. Chambers. OCLC 248904480.
- ISBN 81-206-1999-4.)
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location (link - Halls, John James (1860). Two Months in Arrah in 1857. London: Longman, Green, Longman and Roberts. OCLC 877907.
- O'Malley, Lewis Sydney Steward (1906). Shahabad. Calcutta: The Bengal Secretariat Book Depot. OCLC 252001000.
- Prichard, Iltudus Thomas (1869). The administration of India from 1859 to 1868: the first ten years of administration under the Crown. London: MacMillan & Company. OCLC 908361033.
- Sieveking, Isabel Giberne (1910). A Turning Point in the Indian Mutiny. London: D. Nutt. OCLC 13203015.
- Singh, Sarbans (1993). Battle Honours of the Indian Army 1757 – 1971. New Delhi: Vision Books. ISBN 81-7094-115-6.
- Tayler, William (1858). The Patna Crisis; Or, Three Months at Patna, During the Insurrection of 1857. London: J. Nisbet. OCLC 748092097.
- Trevelyan, George Otto (1864). The Competition Wallah. London: MacMillan & Company. OCLC 308875870.