Siege of Hulst (1596)

Coordinates: 51°18′56.880″N 4°3′14.040″E / 51.31580000°N 4.05390000°E / 51.31580000; 4.05390000
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Siege of Hulst (1596)
Part of the
Rijksmuseum Amsterdam
DateMiddle of July –18 August 1596
Location51°18′56.880″N 4°3′14.040″E / 51.31580000°N 4.05390000°E / 51.31580000; 4.05390000
Result Spanish victory[1][2][3]
Belligerents
Dutch Republic United Provinces
 England
Spain Spanish Empire
Commanders and leaders
Spain Archduke Albert
Spain Manuel de Vega
Spain Luis de Velasco
Strength
Hulst: 3,700[4][5]
Relief forces: 7,000[6]
12,000 to 15,000[7]
Casualties and losses
500 killed or wounded[8]
3,000 surrendered[8]
1,300 to 2,000 dead[2][9]
800 to 3,000 wounded[2][5][10]
Siege of Hulst (1596) is located in Zeeland
Siege of Hulst (1596)
Location within Zeeland
Siege of Hulst (1596) is located in Netherlands
Siege of Hulst (1596)
Siege of Hulst (1596) (Netherlands)

The siege of Hulst of 1596 took place between mid-July and August 18, 1596, at the city of

Maurice of Orange launched a failed attempt to relieve the city, the garrison of Dutch and English troops fell into Spanish hands on August 18, 1596.[10][12]

Background

From 1590 to 1594 the Dutch under the leadership of Maurice of Orange achieved great military successes and expanded their territory, capturing numerous strategic towns and cities,

burghers of Bruges to lay siege to Ostend with an offer of 1,200,000 guilders towards the expenses.[8] This however was not to be as Maurice had heavily reinforced the garrison with fresh troops and supplies.[7]

Albert's force marched from

they were sacking.[17][18] The Dutch public however funded enough money for some 2,000 soldiers. With Maurice's army thinly stretched Albert realised he could strike at Hulst without hindrance.[6]

Siege

Albert marched towards Hulst, avoiding any contact with Maurice's army and soon invested it.[19] Hulst, a small but strong town commanding the Waasland of Flanders, had been captured in 1591 by an Anglo-Dutch force under Maurice.[20] The garrison had built several sconces, and defences were made more complete by a system of sluices through which the country around could be laid under water.[7] The moat had been deepened but the walls were only partially repaired.[10]

Albert VII, Archduke of Austria. Print by Hugo Grotius

Albert's successful ruse however had much of Holland in panic but Maurice's army soon learned of Albert's intention to take Hulst and marched towards the town. The Dutch were hoping for a long siege and had enough supplies for seven months and under the veteran Georg Eberhard the Count von Solms were to hold it at all costs.[7]

In spite of the resistance offered by the besieged who made several highly successful

mine under the wall.[16] This soon unlocked the will of the minds of the garrison as well as the inhabitants and with nearly 700 losses mostly to disease, this fear of an impending assault to ensure their destruction resulted in a panic.[7][10]

Maurice along with William Louis had approached Hulst, but Count Von Solms under pressure from the citizens had already asked to surrender the city.[12] Maurice did, however, at first attempt to relieve the city, but failed owing to the strong defences, and soon withdrew.[6] Even the Spanish were surprised that the city wanted to surrender, and on August 18, 1596 Albert readily granted the most favourable terms to the 3,000 strong garrison.[19]

Aftermath

For the archduke the victory was costly: sixty officers and 5000 men had perished, mostly from disease.[10][22] Hulst had been badly battered and had nearly 3,500 cannonballs hurled in and at the city.[21]

The Zealanders were so dissatisfied with the conduct of the Count of Solms that they dismissed him from the command of their troops.[17] The success made sure that Albert had gained the respect of King Philip II and as a result had broken a chain of defeats that they had sustained earlier in the decade, both in France and the Netherlands.[10][19] The city would remain in Spanish hands until 4 November 1645 when the place was captured by Prince of Orange.[23]

With this defeat the Republic then feared a Spanish siege of the cities of Axel and Biervliet. However, after his severe losses, Albert did not have enough troops to continue his march and withdrew to Flanders; the Republic heard the news via the interception of a letter to Philip.[16] The Dutch were relieved, and thus Maurice now had the advantage of the return of English troops back from their success at Cadiz.[18] He was able to launch a successful offensive the following year, the first of which was the defeat of the Spanish Tercios at the Battle of Turnhout.[17][6]

References

  1. ^ a b Olaf van Nimwegen. The Dutch Army and the Military Revolutions 1588–1688. p.164
  2. ^ a b c d Giménez Martín p.232
  3. ^ a b c Edmundson p 94
  4. ^ Giménez Martín p.231
  5. ^ a b Robert Fruin p.303
  6. ^ a b c d e van Nimwegen pp 163–64
  7. ^ a b c d e f g Motley, John Lothrop. The Rise of the Dutch Republic, Entire 1566–74. pp. 394–95.
  8. ^ a b c d Ward, Adolphus William (1918). Cambridge Modern History, Volume 3. Macmillan. pp. 626–28. Cambridge Modern History, Volume 3.
  9. ^ .Carlos Coloma: 1566-1637, espada y pluma de los tercios. Guill Ortega p.93
  10. ^ a b c d e f Charles Maurice Davies (1851). The History of Holland and the Dutch nation: from the beginning of the tenth century to the end of the eighteenth. G. Willis. pp. 348–49.
  11. ^ Marjolein 't Hart p.22
  12. ^ a b c Wernham pp 81–82
  13. ^ van der Hoeven pp 116–18
  14. ^ Motley, John Lothrop (1867) pp 338–340
  15. ^ Motley, John Lothrop (1867) p 374
  16. ^ a b c Tex pp 207–09
  17. ^ a b c 't Hart p 22
  18. ^ a b Knight, Charles Raleigh: Historical records of The Buffs, East Kent Regiment (3rd Foot) formerly designated the Holland Regiment and Prince George of Denmark's Regiment. Vol I. London, Gale & Polden, 1905, p 43
  19. ^ a b c Duerloo p 45
  20. ^ Knight (1905) p 38
  21. ^ a b Meskens pp 205–06
  22. Ward, A. W. (1905). The Cambridge Modern History
    . p. 628.
  23. ^ Knight (1905) p 78

Bibliography