User talk:Tayi Arajakate: Difference between revisions

Discretionary sanctions alerts

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in page-specific restrictions , when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here . If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Template:Z33 This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called page-specific restrictions , when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here . If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Template:Z33 This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called page-specific restrictions , when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here . If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Template:Z33 This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in coronavirus disease 2019 ( page-specific restrictions , when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Template:Z33

Barnstars

Women in Red Women in Asia contest Tayi Arajakate Third Place December 2020 Congratulations! WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:31, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply] The Women in Red Barnstar For creating Kavita Devi and subsequently guiding it through an ill-considered AfD, thank you for helping diversify our coverage of important journalists. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 19:00, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply] Women in Red Women in Asia contest Tayi Arajakate First Place November 2020 - 26 articles WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:16, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply] The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar I always see you. Hope I do again. 👀 Firestar464 (talk) 03:55, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply] The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar Thank you for conducting 7 reviews in the October 2020 GAN Backlog drive. Your work helped us to reduce the backlog by over 48%. Regards, Eddie891 Talk Work 14:42, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply ] The Barnstar of Diligence You've gotten through the worst of it, and you're a fully-fledged member of the community now! :D Congratulations on getting unblocked! –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 14:44, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply] The Civility Barnstar For patiently responding on the talk pages and setting an example on WP:CIVIL. good work. ⋙–DBigXrayᗙ 07:54, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply ]

Did you know?

On 8 December 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Salma (writer), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Salma wrote some of her works while sitting on the toilet, on pieces of paper ripped from calendars and notebooks? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Salma (writer). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Salma (writer)), and it may be added to the statistics page if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for joining the Organized Labour project. I've been a participant in the project since 2006 and am helping with a revival of it. As part this we are introducing a new membership system, which will help with communications among participants. This involves creating a membership file for each participant within your user space (you can see an example of my membership card here: User:Goldsztajn/WikiProjectCards/WikiProject Organized Labour). This system is already in operation within a number of wikiprojects (such as Women in Red and Medicine). You will not have to do anything, myself or someone else from the project will create the relevant file within your userspace. However, I am conscious that it is not polite to change an editor's user space without notice. If I don't hear from you in the negative, I will go ahead with making the change after the 18th of January. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Many thanks for supporting the project, in solidarity, --Goldsztajn (talk) 10:39, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Goldsztajn, I'm happy to hear that the project is being revived seeing as how poorly covered topics related to it are on Wikipedia. I've no problems if someone were to create such a card in my user space. I've one question though, since this is being modeled on Women in Red and Medicine, would there be events such as those on Women in Red to improve participation and coverage? Tayi Arajakate _Talk 20:41, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tayi Arajakate, I like your enthusiasm! At the moment, my main (short-term) objective is to provide the project with a new set of tools which will hopefully facilitate collaboration and give better overviews of articles within the project. Awhile back I wrote to a number of the veteran editors who started the project with the following ideas:

• identify editors to focus on regional levels - esp. Africa, MENA and Asia
• start a newsletter
• targeted work on gender and unions (eg seeking support from projects on women, feminism, making women blue etc)
• generalised encouragement of editors involved (eg a Stakhanovite barnstar...not being completely facetious)

These plus the techniques used at Women in Red would all possibly help. I'm also conscious we've been dormant a long time, so necessary to get things moving sustainably, but even if we can get only four or five regulars, a lot more coordinated work could be done. Kind regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 21:12, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Goldsztajn, as a suggestion, one of the things I've seen helpful to projects is generally a dedicated noticeboard for articles related to it rather than the project's talkpage being used for it. In general, I'd be interesting in helping out and might get back to some pages I've been thinking about working on for some time. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 07:47, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tayi Arajakate, there will be a number of elements (bot-produced) which will produced updated information about articles: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Organized_Labour/Article_alerts and Wikipedia:WikiProject_Organized_Labour/Recent_changes. There will also be a monthly report on the most viewed articles Wikipedia:WikiProject_Organized_Labour/Popular_pages. I hope to have the transition completed by the end of the month and we can continue this discussion on the project talk page. Kind regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 08:01, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 12 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Swati Thiyagarajan, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the environmental journalist Swati Thiyagarajan investigated claims of interspecies communication made by the conservationist Anna Breytenbach? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Swati Thiyagarajan. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Swati Thiyagarajan), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:04, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Network18 Group, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Business Today.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On

autism spectrum through Therukoothu folk-theatre performances? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Thilagavathi. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Thilagavathi), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page

.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 20 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sangeeta Isvaran, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Bharatanatyam dancer Sangeeta Isvaran works with deprived communities and uses dance and theatre in an effort to bring about social reform? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sangeeta Isvaran. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sangeeta Isvaran), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On

Radio Quarantine was founded in India by a group of professors, directors and PhD students in response to social isolation protocols following the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Radio Quarantine. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Radio Quarantine), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page

.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | February 2021, Volume 7, Issue 2, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 189, 190, 191 Online events: New: Black women | Classicists | Folklore Contest (Jan/Feb/Mar): Africa Year-long campaign: Women's rights Continuing: #1day1woman Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage | Help us plan future events Become a member | Opt-out of notifications Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 15:00, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Apologies for the multiple pings. How many did you get? By my count I only used your name "twice", while linking your comment. I will use no ping template in future while citing your comments. Walrus Ji (talk) 13:21, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Walrus Ji, thank you for the consideration. I got a ping every time you linked by name since you used Template:User link to do so. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 13:30, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I only used the link and the {{

u}} 2 times to link your user name. Did you get more than 2 pings? I had no idea you will get offended. Walrus Ji (talk) 13:38, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Walrus Ji, I didn't get offended by the pings or mean to sound offended. I might have gotten a bit annoyed that you were refering to me as "he" and refering to my comment as if it were a consensus. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 14:12, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tayi Arajakate, I assumed you as a "he". For that you deserve another apology from me. Please consider clarifying your preferred pronoun on your user page. Walrus Ji (talk) 14:25, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also none of those 2 comments by my where I pinged you, referred to your comments as consensus. In fact I explicitly called it "your opinion" and I never even used the word consensus. Walrus Ji (talk) 06:47, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As a filer of the RFC. Are you not supposed to comment? Walrus Ji (talk) 19:25, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Walrus Ji, I have no such restriction. Only the one who closes an RfC, especially for ones that become contentious, is generally supposed to be an uninvolved person. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 06:10, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. I asked as I did not see your opinion on that thread. Walrus Ji (talk) 06:20, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Citation Barnstar
	Thank you, Tayi Arajakate, for incorporating over 20 high-quality academic publications into the Love Jihad article. Your strenuous research efforts have turned this lead section into one of the most well-sourced among all Wikipedia articles. — Newslinger talk 08:51, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply ]

• Thank you for the kind word. Hopefully, the lead will serve as a blueprint for the development of the article. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 23:17, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Its been a while since you made this edit. However, I'd still want to ask. First off, thanks for the edit. Would you care to explain why this, rather well referenced section, was reverted ? I understand the reason given was vandalism and BLP unsourced. There are some parts which certainly looks like an act of vandalism. However, the rest of the section looks sufficiently referenced. The news article clearly names "Param Bir Singh".

For your reference, the revision I'm referring to is [1].

μTalk 16:13, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

questionable source and The Times of India (RSP entry) which should not be used for contentious material especially in a BLP. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 23:36, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

(t · c) buidhe 04:45, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | March 2021, Volume 7, Issue 3, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 192, 193 Online events: New: Art+Activism | VisibleWikiWomen Contest (Jan/Feb/Mar): Africa Year-long campaign: Women's rights Continuing: #1day1woman Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage | Help us plan future events Become a member | Opt-out of notifications Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:49, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Round 1 of the competition has finished; it was a high-scoring round with 21 contestants scoring more than 100 points. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2, with 55 contestants qualifying. You will need to finish among the top thirty-two contestants in Round 2 if you are to qualify for Round 3. Our top scorers in Round 1 were:

• Epicgenius led the field with a featured article, nine good articles and an assortment of other submissions, specialising on buildings and locations in New York, for a total of 945 points.
• Bloom6132 was close behind with 896 points, largely gained from 71 "In the news" items, mostly recent deaths.
• ImaginesTigers, who has been editing Wikipedia for less than a year, was in third place with 711 points, much helped by bringing League of Legends to featured article status, exemplifying how bonus points can boost a contestant's score.
• Amakuru came next with 708 points, Kigali being another featured article that scored maximum bonus points.
• Ktin, new to the WikiCup, was in fifth place with 523 points, garnered from 15 DYKs and 34 "In the news" items.
• The Rambling Man scored 511 points, many from featured article candidate reviews and from football related DYKs.
• Gog the Mild, last year's runner-up, came next with 498 points, from a featured article and numerous featured article candidate reviews.
• Hog Farm, at 452, scored for a featured article, four good articles and a number of reviews.
• Le Panini
  , another newcomer to the WikiCup, scored 438 for a featured article and three good articles.
• Lee Vilenski, last year's champion, scored 332 points, from a featured article and various other sport-related topics.

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. In Round 1, contestants achieved eight featured articles, three featured lists and one featured picture, as well as around two hundred DYKs and twenty-seven ITNs. They completed 97 good article reviews, nearly double the 52 good articles they claimed. Contestants also claimed for 135 featured article and featured list candidate reviews. There is no longer a requirement to mention your WikiCup participation when undertaking these reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or something else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:27, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,I have familiarised myself with all terms and conditions of Wikipedia. The edits were not published due to biasness of writers. I edited the pages "The wire" and "Siddharth Varadarajan" as they were associated with "left wing" I was in Wikipedia since last 8 years,I had technical issues with my old account,so created a new one,I had contributed to Wiki significantly,so I am familiar with terms and conditions Wikipedia editors should be neutral/centrists,so kindly recheck the minor edit Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrperf12 (talk • contribs) 04:43, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

sockpuppetry, if it is a blocked account you would need to be unblocked if you intend to continue editing. I have left a welcome message on your talk page with a list of links to important guidelines and I would highly recommend going through them again if you really have went through them previously. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 11:15, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bima Bharti.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Dylsss^{(talk contribs)} 15:31, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

One day you will be exposed like WifIone.

Ms Sarah Welch was exposed after long time as a sockpuppet, Mar4d was blocked as a sockpuppet, Faizan was blocked as a sockpuppet.

I am taking a break, wait till I come back.

Till then enjoy yourself. Don't fool others with fake infobox (This User is a Hindu), like Malik Shabazz fooled others pretending to be a Jew.

You may not be blocked, but topic banning you will be easy due to your excessive anti-Hindu bias like Xtremedood.

You are lucky that Jytdog is banned.