Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses
Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses (SEAD, pronounced Despite generally being associated with aircraft, SEAD missions may be performed using any means, including through actions by ground forces.
In some contexts, Destruction of Enemy Air Defenses (DEAD) is used to reference physical destruction of air defense targets, while SEAD applies to sorties which discourage enemy use of their air-defense radar assets out of fear of placing the assets in jeopardy.
Primitive operations akin to SEAD emerged during the
During the 1990s, extensive use of SEAD was made, particularly during the Gulf War of the early 1990s. Intense aerial attacks of Iraq's integrated air defenses were conducted during Operation Instant Thunder, the Coalition's aerial attacks at the start of the conflict; Iraqi SAM operators regularly resorted to firing missiles with minimal or no guidance due to fears that radar use brought quick retaliation. All Iraqi air defenses in the south were destroyed, although the skies remained unsafe for low altitude flight. In the 1999
History
Pre-Vietnam War
Prior to the Vietnam War, SEAD was an undefined mission: although attempts to destroy enemy air defense sites were undertaken, they were done so on an individual aircraft basis and in relation to specific targets or operations rather than as part of an overall strategy or doctrine of defense suppression.[3] Near the end of the Second World War, US Navy pilots developed a doctrine that could be considered the first example of SEAD. When attaching enemy warships, US Navy fighters would attack enemy warships with machine guns and rockets to distract and or kill the enemy anti aircraft gunners While the torpedo and dive bombers could move in and more accurately target the ship. While crude, these tactics were frequently effective for their time.[4]
World War II
During the
Understanding the importance of
In the
Korean War
While there were some technological changes between World War II and the
As the war progressed, the Communists developed a highly centralized integrated air defense network, incorporating early-warning radars,
Vietnam War
The Vietnam War saw the evolution of what would become known as SEAD over the course of the conflict. At the start of
Eventually new SEAD-dedicated aircraft were introduced, the
Losses suffered by F-105 Wild Weasels spurred on the development of a new variant based on the
Post-Vietnam Wars
With the phase-out of the F-105G, the US Air Force was in need of a new SEAD-dedicated aircraft This effort was given more urgency in 1973 when, during the
On the other hand, the Soviets did not treat SEAD as an independent air operation but as a tactical role to be performed as part of a larger mission, namely an overwhelming air assault against NATO. This role was not carried out by SEAD-specific aircraft but normal bombers and fighter aircraft, such as the Tupolev Tu-16 and Tupolev Tu-22M, which could carry Soviet anti-radiation missiles. These aircraft would be organized into several strike groups whose mission was to lay down "chaff corridors" 40–50 kilometers across at intervals of 10 kilometers, including directly on top of suspected SAM sites. A small number of aircraft in these groups would be equipped with ARMs to physically destroy the sites. These missions were conducted against pre-planned targets which had been previously identified by signals intelligence and other reconnaissance efforts, rather than having aircraft seek out targets of opportunity. The closest the Soviets came to dedicated SEAD platforms were modified stand-off interceptors like the Mikoyan MiG-25BM and attack aircraft like the Sukhoi Su-24M.[23]
The first example of a post-Vietnam SEAD campaign was by the United Kingdom during the 1982 Falklands War. The RAF Avro Vulcan B.Mk-2 was initially planned to be retired in early 1982 but the outbreak of the Falklands War, in April that year postponed it.[24] The Falklands conflict was the only time that the Vulcan performed SEAD missions, flying very long-range missions against Port Stanley, armed with AGM-45 Shrike missiles mounted on makeshift underwing pylons and carrying a AN/ALQ-101 pod for jamming.[25]
Shortly afterwards was Israel's
Israel's attack on the SAMs was inadvertently assisted by the Syrians, who often placed their sites in sub-optimal positions and failed to relocate their equipment, use dummy radars or maintain active
Gulf War
However, the Iraqi IADS had several fatal flaws of which Coalition air forces were able to take advantage. The system was primarily oriented towards defending against much smaller attacks from Iraq's most likely enemies –
Suppression of the Iraqi IADS played a prominent role in
The opening shots of Operation Desert Storm were fired on January 17 in pursuit of defense-suppression: at 2:20AM local time Task Force Normandy, a group of twelve American helicopters, infiltrated into Iraq with the goal of destroying two early-warning radar sites. Three
Throughout the rest of the first night additional air-defense targets were hit by Coalition aircraft with varying levels of success while strikes against other targets consisted of a high ratio of SEAD and escort to strike aircraft. This pace of attack against air-defense and other targets continued into the first day, involving a variety of different aircraft, and spread to targets in Kuwait.
By the end of the first forty-eight hours of Desert Storm, the Coalition had achieved its goal of significantly degrading Kari, including the destruction of all air defenses in the south. Although the Iraqis would replace most destroyed radars and bring back many IOCs and SOCs to at least partial operation, this was done so in an unorganized manner, with the Coalition continuing to bomb any reactivated sites.[44] In effect, combined with the failure of Iraq's air force to defend its airspace, the Coalition had gained air supremacy in the skies over Iraq from nearly the outset of the conflict.[44]
Coalition aircraft conducting strategic bombing and interdiction inside Iraq were now free to operate at medium altitudes of 10,000 ft (3,000 m) and higher with no danger of SAM activity. This also put them beyond the effective range of most of Iraq's AAA pieces, which remained a threat.[45] Baghdad's heavy AAA defenses also continued to make it a difficult target to attack, as Coalition forces found out during an attempted strike on January 19 against the Tuwaitha Nuclear Research Center. A variety factors, including the threat of AAA and ballistic SAMs, resulted in the strike's failure and loss of two aircraft.[46]
By January 27, no C3 activity was detected at the SOC level by Coalition forces, and only limited activity at the IOC level. At the end of the conflict, the DIA estimated Kari was operating at 25% its original capacity, and that it would take at least ten years to rebuild the system and another five to retrain the personnel needed to operate it. In total, the SEAD campaign by the Coalition was an unequivocal success, allowing Coalition aircraft to fly at medium and high altitudes over Kuwait and Iraq with impunity. The only losses Coalition aircraft suffered to Iraqi air defenses after the first two days occurred when they operated at low altitudes, primarily conducting close air support or other missions to assist ground forces.[47]
Operation Allied Force
The bombing campaign of the
However, a number of deficiencies in NATO's SEAD operations were revealed during the course of the bombing campaign. The US Air Force had allowed its electronic warfare branch to atrophy in the years after the Gulf War, resulting in greater response times to engaging a SAM threat.[50] Airspace restrictions and rules of engagement limited where NATO aircraft could fly and what targets they could hit, leaving some air defense systems untouched.[48][51] Kosovo's mountainous terrain also made it difficult for NATO to locate and target Yugoslav air defenses, while at the same time the region's poor infrastructure limited where Yugoslav SAM and AAA sites could be placed.[52] Furthermore, according to a post-conflict US intelligence report, Yugoslavia had a spy in NATO's headquarters in Brussels who in the early part of the conflict leaked flight plans and target details to the Yugoslav military, allowing Yugoslav military assets to be relocated to avoid detection; NATO responded by limiting the number of people with access to its plans, which appeared to be successful.[53]
Yugoslavia had a much smaller IADS than Iraq during the Gulf War, but took greater steps at preserving it from NATO's bombing campaign. The Yugoslav integrated air defence system (IADS) was extensive, including underground command sites and buried landlines, which allowed for information to be shared between systems; thus, active radar in one area could target NATO aircraft for SAMs and AAA in another area with no active radar, further limiting NATO's ability to target air defences.[54] By focusing on its operational survival, Yugoslav air defenses ceded a certain amount of air superiority to NATO forces. Yet the persistence of their credible SAM threat forced NATO to allocate greater resources to continued SEAD operations rather than conducting other missions, while Yugoslav AAA and MANPADS forced NATO aircraft to fly at 15,000 ft (4,600 m) or higher. NATO reportedly fired 743 HARMs during the course of the 78-day campaign, but could confirm the destruction of only three of the original 25 SA-6 batteries. At the same time, over 800 SAMs were fired by Yugoslav forces at NATO aircraft, including 477 SA-6s and 124 confirmed MANPADS, for the downing of only two aircraft and several more damaged. That one of the two aircraft shot down was an F-117A Nighthawk marked the first combat loss ever of a stealth aircraft and typified some of the issues NATO faced during the campaign.[49][55]
2003 US invasion of Iraq
At the onset of the
Still, the defense network was relatively outdated and thus unable to seriously challenge the
During the course of the invasion, there were 1,660 reports of SAM launches and similar numbers of AAA firings, for the loss of very few aircraft. While Iraq largely failed to shoot down many Coalition aircraft, the sheer numbers of their air defenses still made them dangerous until the final stages of the invasion. This was true in particular for its large number of short-range missile and AAA weapons, which made low-altitude missions deadly and were harder to suppress. Where possible, Coalition forces conducted stand-off strikes from outside the range of these defenses.[56] The unsuccessful 2003 attack on Karbala exemplifies the dangers faced by aircraft operating at low altitudes around air defenses.[61][62]
2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine
Many Ukrainian air defence facilities were reportedly destroyed or damaged in the first days of the invasion by Russian air strikes.[63] On 5 March 2022, the Russian Air Force (VVS) declared that it had achieved air superiority, 11 days after the beginning of the invasion,[64]: minute 17:35 but not air supremacy.[65][a] However, that same day, Russia lost at least ten aircraft.[68] On 11 March 2022, retired United States Air Force Lieutenant General David Deptula stated in The New York Times that the Russian Air Force had not achieved air superiority, noting that supposedly vulnerable Ukrainian drones had continued to operate against Russian forces.[69]
While several early air strikes on Yavoriv in Western Ukraine were performed by Russian bombers, their munitions were firing from a distance while flying within Russian air space, rather than entering Ukrainian air space; on 13 March 2022, dozens of air-launched cruise missiles were launched from within Russia to reach Western Ukraine, because it was allegedly too dangerous for the Russian Air Force to fly over Ukrainian space due to Ukrainian air defenses.
On 30 August 2022, Command of Ukrainian Air Force (KpsZSU) released a video of its MiG-29 jets firing AGM-88 HARM missiles against Russian air defenses,[74][75] one day after an alleged attack on Russian radar site for S-400 SAM batteries near Sevastopol in Russian-occupied Crimea.[76] Earlier in the Summer, multiple Russian SAM batteries had been hit and the remains of AGM-88 missiles had been found on site.[77][78] The U.S. government acknowledged the previously undisclosed transfer of AGM-88 missiles to Ukraine on August 8, 2022.[79]
There are also suspicions of M31A1 GMLRS guided rockets firing from M142 HIMARS rocket artillery been used by Ukrainian military against Russian air defense systems.[80]
On 15 February 2023 the
Weapons
The weapons most often associated with this mission are anti-radiation missiles (ARMs), which work by homing in on radio emission sources like radar antennae. These missiles are equipped with relatively small warheads, limiting collateral damage, but can easily destroy radar antennae and thus cripple an enemy's air defense system. Early examples of ARMs could be fooled by turning off the radar system, which would cease emitting radiation for the missile to track; more recent missiles are fitted with fire-control systems which "remember" where the source was and continue towards that location.[83] Anti-radiation missiles proved particularly effective during the Vietnam War where, despite the small number carried relative to other munitions, they accounted for 46% of all SA-2 batteries destroyed.[84][85]
However, a weapon need not be designed specifically for SEAD missions to be used to damage or destroy a component of an air defense system. A Paveway LGB for example is not a SEAD-specific munition, but when used to destroy a radar antenna it still achieves the desired effect. The American AGM-154 Joint Standoff Weapon is a valuable SEAD weapon due to its fairly long standoff range which allows the launching aircraft to avoid being threatened by all but the longest-range missiles, and its relatively large area of destruction against lightly armored targets.[1][86]
Possibly the most effective type of unguided ("dumb") weapon used during SEAD strikes are
Artillery is also used to conduct SEAD missions. After World War II, the combined arms nature of warfare meant an increased role in ground forces performing SEAD missions in support of air operations. During the Cold War the American military developed a joint definition of SEAD responsibilities, with the Army responsible for all SEAD missions within the range of observable fire and the Air Force for all missions further away. The Soviet Union placed less emphasis on using artillery to conduct SEAD missions, although where possible artillery would be used to clear a path for attack helicopters. Because of their superior range, rocket artillery such as MLRS are the ideal weapon for conducting SEAD operations.[89][90]
By country
Africa
Egypt
Morocco
America
Brazil
- AMX International equipped with the Brazilian MAR-1 missile [95]
United States
USAF
In the US Air Force, the aircraft designed for these missions is known as the "Wild Weasel". It describes aircraft tasked with SEAD missions with anti-radiation missiles. Several platforms have fulfilled this role by the past.
- Wild Weasel I, based on the 354th Tactical Fighter Squadronbased in Thailand, for missions over North Vietnam.
- Wild Weasel II, based on the F-4C Phantom[98] It was a very short period as it wasn't a performant platform for this mission.
- Wild Weasel III, based on the F-105F and G (two-seat variant), operational from 1965 to early 1984 [99]It was known as the "Thud" by the crew. It was a well performing variant. It is the first SEAD dedicated platform of the USAF.
- Wild Weasel IV, based on the F-4C Phantom II known as the EF-4C [100]An order for the modification of 36 Phantom II in Wild Weasel IV dedicated variants was made because of the attrition of the F-105 Wild Weasel III.
- Wild Weasel V, based on the F-4G, operational from 1978 until 1996. 134 F-4E were modified for the SEAD mission.[101]
- Wild Weasel VI, based on the F-16 C/D – Block 50/52, known as the F-16CJ/DJ and operational since 1991, and it remains the dedicated SEAD variant, using the AGM-88 HARM.[102]
- EA-6B Prowler
- F/A-18A/B/C/D Hornet
- F/A-18E/F Super Hornet
- Boeing EA-18G Growler
US Marine Corps
Asia
Australia
- AGM-88G AARGM-ER missiles[104]
Bahrain
- F-16 Block 70 equipped with
China
- Xian JH-7 equipped with YJ-91 anti-radiation missiles[107]
- Chengdu J-10 equipped with YJ-91 anti-radiation missiles[107]
- J-11BS (2-seat variant) equipped with CM-102 anti-radiation missiles[108]
India
- Su-30MKI equipped with Rudram I,Rudram II and Kh-31P anti-radiation missiles.
- Tejas Mk.1/1A equipped with Rudram I and Kh-31P anti-radiation missiles.
- Dassault Mirage 2000 equipped with Rudram I anti-radiation missiles.
- MiG-29UPG equipped with Rudram I and Kh-31P anti-radiation missiles.
Pakistan
Saudi Arabia
Vietnam
- Su-22M4 equipped with Kh-25MP/MPU anti-radiation missiles.[111]
- Su-30MK2 equipped with Kh-31P anti-radiation missiles.[112]
Europe
Turkey
- There is one fleet that equipped with an anti radiation missile.
- The Turkısh 151.Tunc Fleet’s F-16 aircraft was equipped with AGM-88 missiles.[1]
France
- No aircraft in the French military is currently equipped with an anti-radiation missile, there is no proper SEAD capable aircraft.
- The Mirage III was equipped with the Martel missile.[113]
- The Mirage F1 was equipped with the Martel missile, but the missile was retired in 1997.[113]
Germany
- AARGM missiles and electronic warfare capabilities, operational since 1990. Germany manufactured 35 new Tornado for this mission[114]
- Eurofighter T2, T3 and T4 equipped with AGM-88E [115]
Greece
- Older F-16 equipped with AGM-88B Block IIIA and ADM-88E
- Modernised F-16V to be equipped with AARGM that have been ordered[116]
Italy
- AARGM missiles and electronic warfare capabilities, operational since 1990. taly modified 16 of its Tornado IDS.[114]
Netherlands
- AARGM-ER on order [117]
Spain
- EF-18 equipped with AGM-88 HARM and currently in use[118]
United Kingdom
- The former Panavia Tornado GR4 was equipped with the ALARMmissile for its SEAD missions.
- The former British Aerospace Sea Harrier was equipped with the AS37 Martel missile, later with the ALARM missile.
Systems in development
Aircraft
- Panavia Tornado ECR / SEAD for the German Air Force. The program is known in Germany as LUWES ("Luftgestätze Wirkung im Elektromagnetischen Spektrum"). It is planned to reach its IOC by 2029. It is a 2-seat Eurofighter. Airbus Defence is the leading company for the development of the aircraft. In the SEAD/DEAD configuration it is planned to be equipped with:[120]
- F-35
- F-16CJ Fighting Falcon. A program for a new missile is ongoing (look at the section "Missiles" below).[122]Some structural modifications were needed to integrate sensors and the new munition planned. Those modifications were applied to the Lots 14 in 15 of F-35 production.
- British Armed Forces The F-35B will fulfil the SEAD role with the integration of the SPEAR EW missiles as describes below.
Missiles
- Spear EW F-35B, 4 missiles will be able to fit in the missile bay.
- Stand-in Attack Weapon (SiAW) program [124]: A new program of the US Air Force for a new SEAD / DEAD weapon. Contracts have been issued to fund the initial development with Lockheed Martin, L3 Harris Technologies and Northrop Grumman that are in competition. During the Phase 1, the USAF is aligning the capabilities of the missile systems to the needs of the air force and to the technical requirements of the F-35. The end goal is 3,000 SiAW missiles for USD $8.6 billion.[125]
- Northrop Grumman is offering the F-35C.
- Lockheed is starting the program from scratch with a new digital design. Lockheed leverages the advanced digital solutions developed by Skunk Works for other programs in this project. The concept is an open, agile, digital weapon.[126]
- L3 Communications, part of L3 Harris acquired a radar / sensor supplier back in 2017, Mustang Technology Group LP, and with the new consolidated competence center, it is developing its new offer for this program.
- Northrop Grumman is offering the
- AGM-88G AARGM-ER:[117] It is the latest variant of the AGM-88, and is being integrated to the US Navy F/A-18E/F Super Hornet and the EA-18G Growler. The Australian government approved the purchase of 60 missiles for $431 million in August 2023.[104] The Netherlands Air force announced the purchase of the missile in June 2023 for its F-35A.[127]
Notes
References
- ^ a b Tucker, Spencer C. (Editor), The Encyclopedia of Middle East Wars: The United States in the Persian Gulf, Afghanistan, and Iraq Conflicts, ABC-CLIO, 2010, pp. 61–62.
- ^ Bolkcom, Christopher. "Military Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses (SEAD): Assessing Future Needs." Archived March 3, 2016, at the Wayback Machine CRS Report for Congress, 2005, p. 5.
- ^ Brungess, James, Setting the Context – Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses and Joint War Fighting in an Uncertain World, Air University Press, June 1994, p. 7.
- ^ Brungess, p. 55.
- ^ Hough, Richard Alexander and Denis Richards, The Battle of Britain: The Greatest Air Battle of World War II, W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., 1989, pp. 138–143, 220.
- ^ Hewitt, William A., Planting the Seeds of SEAD: The Wild Weasel in Vietnam, School of Advanced Airpower Studies, Air University, May 1992, p. 5.
- ^ Hewitt, pp. 6–9.
- ^ Bailey, Johnathan B. A., Field Artillery and Firepower, Naval Institute Press, 2004, p. 76.
- ^ Norman Polmar, Thomas B. Allen, World War II: the Encyclopedia of the War Years, 1941–1945, Courier Dover Publications, 2012, pp. 274–275
- ^ Cleaver, Thomas McKelvey, Air Combat Annals, Pacifica Military History, 2011.
- ^ Olsen, John Andreas, A History of Air Warfare, Potomac Books, Inc., 2010, p. 89.
- ^ Olsen, p. 92.
- ^ Olsen, pp. 98–100.
- ^ Brungess, pp. 4–5
- ^ a b c Brungess, pp. 6–8.
- ^ a b Davies, Peter, F-105 Wild Weasel vs SA-2 'Guideline' SAM, Osprey Publishing, 2011, p. 71.
- ^ Hannah, Craig C., Striving for Air Superiority: The Tactical Air Command in Vietnam, Texas A&M University Press, 2002, pp. 85–86.
- ^ a b Davies, Peter, USAF McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II, Osprey Publishing, 2013, p. 17.
- ^ Brungess, pp. 8–9.
- ^ a b Brungess, pp. 9–11.
- ^ Davies, F-4 Phantom II, pp. 40–41.
- ^ Brungess, p. 104.
- ^ Pace, Phillip E., Detecting and Classifying Low Probability of Intercept Radar, Artech House, 2009, pp. 578–584.
- ^ Burden et al. 1986, p. 363.
- ISBN 0-906339-05-7. pp. 363, 365, 367.
- ^ a b Schlein, Lior; Noam Ophir. "Six Days in June". IAF Magazine (in Hebrew). 145 (June 2002). Archived from the original on July 12, 2009. Retrieved September 10, 2008.
- ^ Grant, Rebecca. "The Bekaa Valley War". Air Force Magazine Online. 85 (June 2002). Archived from the original on March 14, 2012. Retrieved September 22, 2017.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link) - ^ a b Brungess, pp. 16–25.
- ^ Chun, Clayton K. S., Aerospace Power in the Twenty-First Century: A Basic Primer, United States Air Force Academy, Colorado Springs, CO, pp. 243–250.
- ^ Weinraub, Bernard (April 15, 1986). "U.S. Jets Hit 'Terrorist Centers' in Libya; Reagan Warns of New Attacks If Needed". The New York Times.
- ^ "1986 Year in Review: Strike on Qaddafi". UPI. Retrieved October 28, 2014.
- ^ Brungess, pp. 25–34.
- ^ Parks, W. Hays (1986). "Crossing the Line". Proceedings. 112 (11). United States Naval Institute: 40–52.
- ^ a b Davis, Richard G., On Target: Organizing and Executing the Strategic Air Campaign Against Iraq, DIANE Publishing, 2002, pp. 172–179
- ^ a b Knights, Michael, Cradle of Conflict: Iraq and the Birth of Modern U.S. Military Power, Naval Institute Press, 2005, pp. 25–27
- ^ Davis, pp. 77–79
- ^ Davis, p. 105
- ^ a b Knights, pp. 48–49
- ^ Davis, pp. 157–158
- ^ Davis, p. 178
- ^ Davis, p. 182–190
- ^ Davis, p. 196
- ^ Davis, p.197
- ^ a b Davis, p. 217–218
- ^ Davis, p. 221–222
- ^ Davis, p. 249
- ^ Davis, pp. 299–300
- ^ a b Lambeth, Dr. Benjamin S. "Kosovo and the Continuing SEAD Challenge." Air and Space Power Journal. Summer 2002. pp. 10–11.
- ^ a b Lambeth, p. 16.
- ^ Lambeth, p. 17.
- ^ Lambeth, p. 9.
- ^ Lambeth, p. 14.
- ^ Little, Alan; Norton-Taylor, Richard (March 9, 2000). "Nato spy leaked bombing raid plans to the Serbs". The Guardian. Retrieved June 22, 2021.
- ^ Lambeth, p. 15.
- ^ "Serb discusses 1999 downing of stealth". USA Today. October 26, 2005. Archived from the original on May 18, 2007. Retrieved May 8, 2007.
- ^ a b c Cordesman, Anthony H. "The Iraq War: Strategy, Tactics, and Military Lessons" CSIS, 2003. pp. 32–36.
- ^ Michael Smith, "RAF Bombing Raids Tried to Goad Saddam into War," The Sunday Times, 29 May 2005.
- ^ Marshall, Andrew. "Iraq fires missiles at RAF Tornado." The Independent, 31 December 1998.
- ^ "The war before the war". News Statesman. May 30, 2005.
- ^ Payne, Stewart. "Missile alerts at Tornado base after bombing raids." The Telegraph, 21 March 2003.
- ^ Deadly Scourge of the US Helicopter Pilots in Iraq Archived 2013-05-12 at the Wayback Machine by Colonel David Eshel
- ^ Schechter, Erik (June 13, 2003). "Choppers on the Chopping Block?". Jerusalem Post. Archived from the original on October 25, 2012. Retrieved July 5, 2017.
- ^ Beale, Jonathan (April 14, 2022). "Ukraine's battle for control of its skies". BBC News. Retrieved April 19, 2022.
- ^ Deutsche Welle (5 March 2022) War in Ukraine: A week that shook the world
- ^ ROBERT BURNS and LOLITA C. BALDOR (9 Mar 2022) Ukraine war at 2-week mark: Russians slowed but not stopped "Moscow’s main objective — toppling the Kyiv government and replacing it with Kremlin-friendly leadership — remains elusive, and its overall offensive has been slowed by an array of failings, including a lack of coordination between air and ground forces and an inability to fully dominate Ukraine’s skies."
- ^ David Roza (3 Mar 2022) Where is the Russian Air Force? Experts break down why they might be hiding "It is clear to us that Russia is losing aircraft and helicopters at a damaging rate." —Justin Bronk, RUSI
- ^ Not What You Think (Mar 11, 2022) Why Russia is INCAPABLE of Air Superiority in Ukraine DEAD=Destruction of enemy air defenses, SEAD=Suppression of enemy air defenses
- ^ Trevithick, Joseph. "The Russian Air Force Just Had A Terrible Day Over Ukraine". The Drive. Retrieved March 5, 2022.
- ^ Dave Phillipps; Eric Schmitt (March 11, 2022). "Over Ukraine, Lumbering Turkish-Made Drones Are an Ominous Sign for Russia". The New York Times.
[The Russian Air Force's] failure to secure air superiority has been reflected by their slow and ponderous actions on the ground. Conversely, the Ukrainian air force performing better than expected has been a big boost to the morale of the entire country.
- ^ David Vergun (14 Mar 2022) Russians Pounding Ukraine Cities With Long-Range Fires, Says Official From 24 February to 14 March 2022, Russia has launched more than 900 missiles at Ukraine.
- ^ David Martin, CBS news (14 Mar 2022) Where things stand for the Russian military in the war in Ukraine
- ^ "The curious case of Russia's missing air force". The Economist. March 3, 2022. Retrieved March 9, 2022.
- ^ Mia Jankowicz (19 May 2022) Video shows Ukraine blowing up a sophisticated radar-jamming machine that Russia tried to hide R-330Zh Zhitel
- ^ "One of the 🇺🇦 pilots has made a footage of the MiG-29 fighter jets combat operations". Twitter. Retrieved August 30, 2022.
- ^ "The Ukrainian Air Force has released video showing for the first time ever US-supplied AGM-88 HARM anti-radar missiles being fired from their MiG-29 jets". Twitter. Retrieved August 30, 2022.
- ^ "Russian coastal radar site burning south of Sevastopol, Crimea". Twitter. Retrieved August 30, 2022.
- ^ "Apparently, the Ukrainian army may have received American AGM-88 anti-radar missiles – fragments were reportedly found at Russian positions". Twitter. Retrieved August 30, 2022.
- ^ "Another wrecks of the American AGM-88 HARM was found in Ukraine". Twitter. Retrieved August 30, 2022.
- ^ Oren Liebermann (August 9, 2022). "Pentagon acknowledges sending previously undisclosed anti-radar missiles to Ukraine". CNN. Retrieved August 30, 2022.
- ^ "A valuable Russian 48Ya6-K1 Podlet-K1 low-altitude S-band surveillance radar was destroyed by a Ukrainian rocket strike on Nova Kakhovka, Kherson Oblast. It appears that M31A1 guided rockets were used". Twitter. Retrieved August 30, 2022.
- ^ Chris Gordon (15 Feb 2023) Russian Air Force 'Has Lot of Capability Left' One Year On From Ukraine Invasion
- ^ Michael Marrow (7 Mar 2023) In Ukraine fight, integrated air defense has made many aircraft 'worthless': US Air Force general
- ^ Tucker, Spencer C., pp. 115–116.
- ^ Zaloga, Steven J., Red SAM: The SA-2 Guideline Anti-Aircraft Missile, Osprey Publishing, 2011, p. 19.
- ISBN 1-880588-46-3. ISSN 1473-9917. p. 135.
- ^ Raytheon JSOW Product Sheet Archived 20 October 2006 at the Wayback Machine (PDF file)
- ^ Davies, Peter, F-105 vs SA-2, p. 27
- ^ Owen, Robert C., Deliberate Force: A Case Study in Effective Air Campaigning, Air University Press, 2000, p. 265.
- ^ Bailey, pp. 77–78.
- ^ The Multiple Launch Rocket System Archived 2018-10-31 at the Wayback Machine. Warfare History Network. 30 October 2018.
- ^ Chun, pp. 295–296.
- ^ Newcome, Laurence R., Unmanned Aviation: A Brief History of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astornautics 2004, pp. 83–86.
- ^ "Al Quwwat al Jawwiya Ilmisriya/Egyptian Air Force". F-16.net. Retrieved August 7, 2022.
- ^ "Morocco – Weapons and Related Support for F-16 Aircraft" (Press release). US Defense Security Cooperation Agency. July 11, 2008. Archived from the original on February 20, 2018. Retrieved February 20, 2018 – via Defense-Aerospace.com.
- ^ Morais, Ana; Filho, José; Mallaco, Lais; Brito, Márcia (2011). Relatório de Atividades: 2010 (PDF) (Report) (in Portuguese). Brazilian Aeronautics and Space Institute. p. 67. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 July 2012. Retrieved 4 September 2012.
- ^ Michel III p. 35
- ^ Hobson p. 43
- ^ LeMieux, Lawrence. "SoWW Historian".
- ^ Dorr and Bishop 1996, pp. 60–61.
- ^ "McDonnell EF-4C Phantom II".
- ^ "McDonnell Douglas F-4G Wild Weasel". National Museum of the United States Air Force™. Retrieved September 16, 2023.
- ^ The F-16C is the only aircraft in the Air Force current inventory to use the AGM-88. https://www.af.mil/About-Us/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/104574/agm-88-harm/
- ^ "EA-18G Growler | Air Force". airforce.gov.au. Archived from the original on January 20, 2024. Retrieved March 19, 2024.
- ^ a b https://www.minister.defence.gov.au/media-releases/2023-08-21/australia-invests-powerful-new-high-tech-missiles
- ^ "Weapons to Support F-16 Block 70/F-16V Aircraft Fleet". Defense Security Cooperation Agency. May 3, 2019. Retrieved August 31, 2023.
- ^ "Contracts for May 23, 2019". U.S. Department of Defense. Retrieved August 31, 2023.
- ^ a b nonothai (November 20, 2016). "YJ-91 anti-radiation missile Aegis destroyer kille". Thai Military and Asian Region. Retrieved September 16, 2023.
- ^ a b Newdick, Thomas (November 9, 2020). "This May Be Our First Glimpse Of China's New Air-Launched Anti-Radiation Missile". The Drive. Retrieved September 16, 2023.
- ^ "JF-17 – LD-10 Anti-Radiation Missile – UOAF Codex". codex.uoaf.net. Retrieved September 16, 2023.
- ^ UK-Supplied Precision Weapons Prove Popular in Saudi-Led Yemen Campaign – Defensenews.com, 17 October 2016
- ^ Quang Minh (June 10, 2014). "Kh-25 - Tên lửa đối đất chủ lực của Su-22 Việt Nam". Soha (in Vietnamese). Retrieved February 22, 2024.
- ^ "'Sát thủ' diệt hạm và rada - tên lửa KH-31 Việt Nam". Báo điện tử Tiền Phong (in Vietnamese). April 2, 2013. Retrieved February 22, 2024.
- ^ a b "Martel AS-37(Armat) antiradar missile | Missilery.info". en.missilery.info. Retrieved September 16, 2023.
- ^ a b "Panavia Tornado ECR (Electronic Combat / Reconnaissance)". www.militaryfactory.com. Retrieved September 16, 2023.
- ^ "Neue Anti-Radar-Lenkflugkörper AGM-88E2 für Luftwaffe -..." bundeswehr-journal. November 28, 2021. Retrieved June 25, 2023.
- ^ "HAF acquires advanced AGM-88E AARGM anti-radar missiles and AGM-84L Harpoon II anti-ship missiles for F-16V". DefenceHub. June 28, 2022.
- ^ a b https://www.navair.navy.mil/product/AARGM
- ^ "Spain buying HARMs for use on EF-18". Defense Daily. May 25, 1990. Archived from the original on September 24, 2015. Retrieved August 8, 2015.
- ^ ES&T editorial team (January 4, 2023). "Air Force: Number of ECR Eurofighters to increase to 30". esut.de. Retrieved September 16, 2023.
- ^ Valpolini, Paolo (November 16, 2019). "The Eurofighter ECR and the Luftwaffe Electronic Attack concept". EDR Magazine. Retrieved September 16, 2023.
- ^ ESD (June 16, 2023). "Saab's Arexis EW Suite Selected for Luftwaffe's Eurofighter EKs". euro-sd.com. Retrieved September 16, 2023.
- ^ Leone, Dario (June 3, 2020). "Lockheed Martin to retrofit F-35 Joint Strike Fighters for SEAD/DEAD mission". The Aviation Geek Club. Retrieved September 16, 2023.
- ^ "SPEAR-EW | Air Dominance, TACTICAL STRIKE". MBDA. Retrieved September 16, 2023.
- ^ Marrow, Michael (March 17, 2023). "Air Force program for new F-35 missile will knock out at least one prime in FY24". Breaking Defense. Retrieved September 16, 2023.
- ^ Wolfe, Frank (August 26, 2022). "USAF Awards Contracts for Next Phase of Stand-in Attack Weapon to Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and L3Harris". Defense Daily. Retrieved September 16, 2023.
- ^ "Starting a Program from (Digital) Scratch". Lockheed Martin. Retrieved September 16, 2023.
- ^ "Nieuwe munitie F-35's vergroot slagkracht – Nieuwsbericht". Defensie.nl. June 5, 2023.