Talk:Ruth Ann Davis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Good articleRuth Ann Davis has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 22, 2023Good article nomineeListed
December 9, 2023Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 14, 2023.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that professor Ruth Ann Davis made the largest ever single contribution to Potomac State College of West Virginia University to support nursing scholarships in memory of her mother?
Current status: Good article
WikiProject iconPhysiology Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article has not yet been associated with a particular area.
WikiProject iconUnited States: History / West Virginia / West Virginia University / 50,000 Challenge Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. history (assessed as Low-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject West Virginia (assessed as Low-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject West Virginia University (assessed as High-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article was created or improved during this WikiProject's 50,000 Challenge, which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help!
WikiProject iconUnited States History Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject United States History To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconWomen's History Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconWomen scientists Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PrimalMustelid talk 01:54, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to mainspace by West Virginian (talk). Self-nominated at 11:20, 11 October 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Ruth Ann Davis; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

  • Article was worked on in userspace and then moved into mainspace. It is long enough, has citations throughout, and appears to be neutrally written. The hook fact is interesting enough and sourced. QPQ is provided. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:39, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is
transcluded from Talk:Ruth Ann Davis/GA1
. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Maxim Masiutin (talk · contribs) 21:22, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Questions

Hello, West Virginian!

While reviewing the article Ruth Ann Davis, I have two questions:

  1. Do you think that the following record Records on Women Ambassadors may help us add more information? https://bush41library.tamu.edu/files/foia/1998-0260-F.pdf
  2. Do you think that a link about teaching may also bring benefit to the article? https://www.learntechlib.org/p/33679/

Reviewer's opinion

  1. Well-written:
    1. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and
    2. it complies with the
      WP:COI
    3. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
    4. Illustrated:
      1. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
      2. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

    Overall result: pass. The questions I addressed at the #Reviewer's opinion section would not prevent the article to pass the criteria check. Maxim Masiutin (talk) 04:27, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

    The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.