User:SpartaN/Delog

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< July 03	July 05 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Slovene exonyms

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

When I click the cite I get a warning that it may be a deceptive website Chidgk1 (talk) 11:03, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Slovenia. Chidgk1 (talk) 11:03, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:13, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Finnish exonyms for places in Norway

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Uncited and not notable. In the past 12 years an enormous amount of uncited info has been added to the internet. So at least we could delete some. Wikipedians opinion on uncited articles may have changed since the last discussion. Chidgk1 (talk) 10:52, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language, Lists, Finland, and Norway. Shellwood (talk) 11:14, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Comment This should be considered alongside
WP:BEFORE been done? "...uncited info has been added to the internet [so] at least we could delete some" is not a valid reason for deletion; the issue is, do sources for this article exist? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits
11:23, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Finnish exonyms for places in Norway: Finnmark

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

None of the people who voted keep 12 years ago have added any sources. Chidgk1 (talk) 10:47, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Finland. Chidgk1 (talk) 10:47, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists and Norway. Shellwood (talk) 11:14, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Comment This should be considered alongside
WP:BEFORE been done? "None of the people who voted keep 12 years ago have added any sources." is not a valid reason for deletion; the issue is, do such sources exist? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits
11:20, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Delete When skimming through this list I came across the clearly nonsensical "Korsonpuorrä". But neither Google nor Bing turn up any results for "Korsonpuorra" without the Ä at the end, which is what I assume was intended. So it seems like at the very least
WP:TNT would indicate getting rid of this as at least some of the information just seems to be wrong. Stockhausenfan (talk
) 11:39, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
After a bit of a deeper look, it seems that the Kven name of the place is the more sensible Kursunpörä, and "Korsonpuorrä" is the Norwegian transcription of that name. Sensible in Kven, that is, as the Standard Finnish form of this would presumably be "Kursunperä". I.e. it looks like the page is mixing up three different languages - Norwegian, Kven and Finnish. Stockhausenfan (talk) 11:56, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Composition (objects)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The page is a mess, I'm not seeing a reason why it has notability outside of Mereology JMWt (talk) 10:11, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. JMWt (talk) 10:11, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Chapra Christ Church

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lots of broken links on the page, I can't find much to replace them and can't

WP:V the details JMWt (talk

) 10:07, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity and India. JMWt (talk) 10:07, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Keep, Kindly see the references prior to tag of deletion. Further this is a premium heritage institution of the district almost 185 years old and has separate commonsCategory which also made the article notable Pinakpani (talk) 10:16, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Ref 2: three sentences about churches in Chapra, none of which are obviously this one (the origin date of the Roman Catholic church mentioned is different to that one the page)

Ref 3: my browser says not to open as the link is dangerous

Ref 4: is not obviously about this church and doesn't verify the contents of this page

Ref 5: a parliamentary mention about the Church Mission Society which is a British church society and not obviously anything to do with German Protestants or Roman Catholics

Ref 6: doesn't work for me

Ref 7: about the King Edward School and Chapra Protestant church. Not a Roman Catholic church

Ref 8: doesn't work for me

Conclusion none of these refs
WP:V the content on the page. It's not clear whether any of them are about the subject or not JMWt (talk
) 10:47, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:33, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Albanian-Epirote War of 1385

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Single source makes no reference to this a ar, just a failed atack. Molikog (talk) 09:57, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and Military. Molikog (talk) 09:57, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albania and Greece. Shellwood (talk) 10:06, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

The Power Within (1979 film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an unsold TV pilot that is almost entirely unremarked and unnotable. A source was added from Unsold TV pilots: the almost complete guide to everything you never saw on TV, 1955-1990 which is an impressive tome with plot summaries on exactly what it says. That source contains a short plot summary and cast list but nothing else. There is also a second source, Shock Cinema, which has a longer plot summary and some criticism in a review of the showing on ABC (a TV channel) on Friday May 11 1979.

Now GNG requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources. On the number of sources, the guidance is, there is no fixed number of sources required since sources vary in quality and depth of coverage. Significant coverage must be more than trivial. The first source should be excluded because cataloguing all the TV pilots that no-one knows about, and providing only their plot summary is not significant coverage, and if it were, it leads to the undesirable outcome that everything that no-one was interested in is notable, because it is catalogued. That also fails per

WP:N a page must pass both GNG and also not be excluded under WP:NOT

That leaves the second source, which is a single proper review of the two shows that were shown on ABC television on a single night in 1979. The review speak to why it was unsold, and is SIGCOV, but prima facie it is not notable. If we have a page about unsold Aaron Spelling shows (or just his shows generally) we can consider a redirect, but there is nothing notable about this one, and a single review of a single night's programming does not meet the multiple requirement of GNG. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk

) 07:53, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and Television. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:53, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:01, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Merge to
WP:ATD-M. Daranios (talk
) 09:52, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Joan Klein Weidman

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fairly new article written by an inexperienced editor; fails

WP:NBIO; only two sources. Mvcg66b3r (talk

) 04:50, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Journalism, News media, Television, and Pennsylvania. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:50, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

I am also nominating these pages created by the same editor:

Speedy delete: Joan Klein Weidman, Barbara Allen, Dave Brandt, and Nelson Sears are clear
db-G12}} per The Bushranger below. Dave Brandt and Nelson Sears have subsequently been recreated; I make no comment on their suitability for an article, as my main concern was the copyvios. Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk
) 07:21, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

Speedy delete Copyright violations are evendent. Nixleovel (Talk • Contribs) 08:10, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Note Joan Klein Weidman has been edited and no longer qualifies for G12. @SunloungerFrog: @Nixleovel:. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 19:02, 26 June 2025 (UTC)
@Mvcg66b3r:
Also Jeff Werner (sportscaster) does not appear to be a copyvio per Earwig search (since no specific page for it being copyvio'd from was mentioned). The other three have been G12'd. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 19:07, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

I am surprised at that, @The Bushranger. [1] still looks pretty clear cut to me. Both the Early life and education and Career sections have a good deal of overlap. But I'll remove the copied text and request cv-revdel. Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 19:50, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Werner has some SIGCOV, e.g. this. Didn't find anything on Weidman. Sears is notable, but seems to have been deleted already... BeanieFan11 (talk) 02:30, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment -@BeanieFan11 - Sears seems definitely notable from the little research I did. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. Do you feel like writing his article up? I don't have the time. Joan Klein is also this woman's more famous name from what I can find, not WeidmanKatoKungLee (talk) 13:46, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Keep - Dave Brandt (sportscaster) is easily notable. See 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.KatoKungLee (talk) 13:26, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: I've corrected the redlink "Barbara Allen (journalist)", in the "also nominating these pages" list at the top, to the intended Barbara M. Allen (journalist). Note also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Saylor, more "staff of the same television station" from the same creator but which has been listed separately rather than being added here. Bearcat (talk) 14:55, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 07:40, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Note - may I suggest that this AfD be procedurally closed, without prejudice for subsequent AfD nomination of individual articles? The original premise (poorly sourced articles, many of which contained copyvios) has gone away, and with some of the articles having been speedy deleted and then recreated (with better sourcing) during the lifetime of this AfD, it is confusing to have them batched together. Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 07:50, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Sudip Pandey

AfDs for this article:
Articles for deletion/Sudip Pandey

Articles for deletion/Sudip Pandey (2nd nomination)

Sudip Pandey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is may not notable according to
WP:SIG in reliable, independent sources. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶
18:52, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, Film, Asia, and India. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 18:52, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Weak keep despite the earlier deletion. The coverage of his death seems to just barely qualify him. Pinging Zuck28 who added Pandey to the List of Bhojpuri actors in January. TheDeafWikipedian (talk) 20:36, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
It appears that the nominator has a very low understanding of the Wikipedia guidelines. They’re just nominating random articles created by me as an act of retaliation because I nominated a few of the articles they created about non-notable subjects. Their rationale for the AFD is unclear as, why they believe it should be deleted, anyways I leave this matter for fellow editors.

Thank you for pinging me.

Zuck28 (talk) 20:45, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Delete Non notable actor, Mentions, unreliable sources. Fails
WP:NACTOR. CresiaBilli (talk
) 11:29, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
How come you decided that the subject is non-notable, given his filmography he easily passes
Wp:NACTOR. And all the given sources are reliable sources, kindly let me know which source is unreliable? Zuck28 (talk
) 07:25, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:26, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

Comment: Nominator is currently blocked as a sockpuppet. Zuck28 (talk) 05:14, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 15:10, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Weak Keep There is a lot of coverage of his death. Searching on his name in Devanagari (सुदीप पांडे), I also find some coverage of his films prior to his death, particularly V for Victor, which could be added to the article. RebeccaGreen (talk) 14:21, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
@RebeccaGreen, Thank you for your advice. I have added some additional sources as citations and expanded the article with his political career. Can you review it again?

Zuck28 (talk) 09:17, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

Comment: Improved the article. Given his acting career, which includes lead roles in more than 40 films and notable awards, he easily passes
WP:SK#4.Zuck28 (talk
) 06:40, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Please note that the AfD does not qualify for speedy keep under Wikipedia:Speedy_keep#4, since subsequent editors added substantive comments in good faith before the nominator's blocked or banned status was discovered.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 07:34, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Non-extensive self-consistent thermodynamical theory

Non-extensive self-consistent thermodynamical theory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. The article is about a theory proposed in A. Deppman, Physica A 391 (2012) 6380. The article has 66 citations in Google Scholar, and most of those are self-cites. The article was written by User:Deppman. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 07:26, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 07:26, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Kristian Halken

Kristian Halken (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of significant coverage; could not find more sources with significant coverage to demonstrate the actor's notability. Go D. Usopp (talk) 05:23, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, and Denmark. Go D. Usopp (talk) 05:23, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

Keep. See
WP:NACTOR ["the person has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions; or The person has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment.") and the page in Danish please, to check the said roles--Artus Sauerfog Dark-Eon (talk
) 09:35, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

.

Keep: Clicking on the Gnews link above brings up more than a trivial amount of Danish articles, [2] for example, suggests a long career and seems to be well-known by the public. Oaktree b (talk) 15:32, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

Weak Delete Close call, but doesn’t seem to definitively meet
WP:NOTABILITY guidelines. Go4thProsper (talk
) 10:50, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Draftify- as an ATD, given the article has potential being kept, if more SIGCOV be added as well as some integration from the other language ver. like the Danish ver. for same article to this english ver. .Lorraine Crane (talk) 22:59, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 15:20, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Keep The book Danske filmskuespillere: 525 portrætter has a 5 para bio about him (pp 139-140) [3]. As Oaktree b noted, there are many current news stories about him, eg "Kristian Halken has been called the master of supporting roles. One year he won a Reumert for four supporting roles, and it is difficult to find a weak Halken performance. He is now 70 years old. Has Kristian Halken ever actually been bad on a theater stage?" [4]. This article Kristian Halken fra Sommerdahl: Her er hans kendte søn [5] has info about his wife and his son, also an actor. There is plenty of coverage to meet
WP:NACTOR. RebeccaGreen (talk
) 15:16, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 07:14, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Mgboko

Mgboko (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has been tagged as unsourced since 2018. There's no indication of notability, and searching the title on Google gives me not much except for other related Nigerian towns. Many geostubs seem to slide are the radar, and I think this is one of them. Yelps ᘛ⁠⁐̤⁠ᕐ⁠ᐷ critique me 19:13, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:01, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:26, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Comment: Meets
the notability criteria for cities. See this source: Ozuruimo ... Festival Brochure. Imo State Council for Arts and Culture. 1989. p. 50. …HEADQUARTERS: For Administrative convenience, Obioma Ngwa has its Headquarters at Mgboko a town which… Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia
21:17, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

leaning delete Right now this is failing verification. The only source I have is GMaps, which labels the spot given with a different name. I have no problem with recreation given sources that actually locate this and describe it, but it doesn't cut the mustard to say "well it's a town, so we have to keep it." Cough up some basic sourcing and we can talk. Mangoe (talk) 23:48, 27 June 2025 (UTC)
@Mangoe I don't think "the only source I have" is sufficient reason to "leaning delete" especially since you're not familiar with the subject, I think it should be "the only source that exist". Anyway, I have added sources to the article, you should take a look. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:55, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

It is a sufficient reason for leaning delete because if I were certain it didn't exist or was wrongly categorized, I wouldn't be leaning. Produce a real source for the location and I'll withdraw my objection. Mangoe (talk) 19:58, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
@Mangoe Did you check the article back? Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:58, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

Keep: First, does the place exist at all? Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable, even if their population is very low. Even abandoned places can be notable, because notability encompasses their entire history. ... per
NPLACE, this is a clear "indication" of notability, unless "indication" now has a different meaning. Vanderwaalforces (talk
) 14:33, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

That's fine, but where is it? We need a source for that too, and one that verifies (as best we can) against the Real World(tm). Mangoe (talk) 19:58, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
There is a "Mboko" slightly to the north of Aba on figure 4, page 8. Dege31 (talk) 20:30, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 07:02, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Giovanni Baldelli

Giovanni Baldelli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Having gone through the available source material, I have been unable to find anything to establish
notability guidelines for authors, I'm recommending it for deletion. A possible alternative to deletion could be redirecting to social anarchism, although he's not mentioned in the body of that article, so this may not be appropriate. Grnrchst (talk
) 21:48, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Authors, Philosophy, Politics, Social science, and Italy. Grnrchst (talk) 21:48, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

Comment There's an extensive biography in the Dizionario biografico online degli anarchici italiani (which was originally a print publication and is now updated and expanded online)[7]. Between that and the Wieck obituary, I'd be fine with "Keep" if only there was a third published source. The Dizionario points to an undergraduate thesis, but it's unpublished. Jahaza (talk) 04:39, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
You'd hope with an extensive list of publications for
WP:AUTHOR notability, but I only found one review so far.[8] It would be good if someone has access to Italian library sources to search those. Jahaza (talk
) 04:41, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

~~Ah, REDIRECT to~~ ~~David Wieck, where Baldelli and his main book are mentioned. If more sources emerge the article can be broken out again. 04:44, 20 June 2025 (UTC)~~

Striking my !vote. Jahaza (talk) 00:52, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Keep, extensively cited in various works on anarchism. --Soman (talk) 11:03, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

Redirect to Wieck page. Go4thProsper (talk) 10:41, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Keep, just because there is little information now doesn't mean that there won't be more information in the future. FPTI (talk) 00:54, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as opinions are divided between Keep and Redirection.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:03, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

@
WP:IAR and close this up early as a result. Jahaza (talk
) 00:54, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

aaaand now I'm striking my comment about closing early because I see that I wasn't the only one to !vote "redirect" Jahaza (talk) 00:56, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Redirect simply as an
alternative to deletion. The keep comments above have not established which sources as a group meet the GNG. If all we have is the one encyclopedia source and passing mentions in books (which is all I've found), then that isn't enough on which to base a standalone article. It would require a much deeper scavenge of period Italian-language sources to find reviews for his other works, as his 1972 Social Anarchism was not apparently reviewed in English-language periodicals or indexed in Book Review Digest. czar
15:47, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 06:58, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Perry v. Cyphers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I haven't been able to find

significant coverage in the available sources. Seems that there are only passing mentions. voorts (talk/contributions

) 21:39, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Discrimination, Law, and Texas. voorts (talk/contributions) 21:39, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
Merge to
decided in 1951 was news in 1952, but has since faded into obscurity. A sentence or two, and a redirect, is fine. I feel slightly guilt-ridden to write this on Juneteenth, but a smerge is appropriate here. Bearian (talk
) 22:18, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
I don't think this would be
due for inclusion in the Jim Crow article since it only has brief mentions in secondary sources. The source just added by Maile66 is representative of the paucity of coverage of this case, stating, in full: "Determined to remove this subterfuge to voting, Fred Lewis and several other Blacks, assisted by the NAACP, filed suit in Perry v. Cyphers in 1948." voorts (talk/contributions
) 00:41, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is more support for a possible Merge.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:03, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Keep - I added a source on this from the Handbook of Texas online. It could use more text and sourcing, but this was a big voting rights occurrence in Texas at the time. — Maile (talk) 00:39, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

I also just added a Google link (looks like the Times Daily in Alabama) that covered the legal events on this. — Maile (talk) 01:30, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

That's a primary source AP report. voorts (talk/contributions) 01:39, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Comment The sources at this point either (1) don't mention the case at all (refs 4 and 5); (2) mention the case in passing (refs 1, 2, and 6 (which is a

historical marker)); or (3) are primary sources (ref 3). Notability still has not been established. voorts (talk/contributions

) 21:06, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Keep. I can't imagine that a decision of this nature is not covered in some law review article or text on the subject matter. It gets Google Books hits. BD2412 T 20:19, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
And I looked at several of those sources; most of them were brief mentions or mere citations (like the first two hits) or primary sources (like the third hit). I searched relevant legal research databases and found zero significant coverage in law review articles. It's not that unusual that a case like this, of which there were many, did not receive signifcant coverage in the secondary literature. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:44, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 06:56, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Peter G. Engelman

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject was not notable as an accountant. None of his writings are sufficiently noteworthy to meet the requirements of

Wikipedia:AUTHOR. WWGB (talk

) 06:53, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Judaism. WWGB (talk) 06:53, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: England, Maryland, and Oklahoma. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:03, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

2022 University Teachers Association of Ghana strike

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All the sources from this ref bombed article are from 2023. Does not meet

WP:EVENT. Already covered in University Teachers Association of Ghana. Oppose redirect as unlikely search term. LibStar (talk

) 06:53, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Events, Education, and Ghana. LibStar (talk) 06:53, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

BKEX

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see it in mainstream media apart from crypto sites. Forbes mentions it, but only in the context of malpractice. Since we have a lower tolerance for crypto related articles, I think this one doesn't meet the requirements. - The9Man ^Talk 08:11, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cryptocurrency-related deletion discussions. - The9Man ^Talk 08:11, 27 June 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, United Kingdom, and Caribbean. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:31, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:42, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Rangu (film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:BEFORE yields 100% unreliable sources per the Indian cinema taskforce:[9] [10]. DareshMohan (talk

) 06:25, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly

Talk to my owner

:Online 06:49, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, India, and Andhra Pradesh. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 06:59, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Delete This is completely a non-notable article. No significant coverage and how can an article survive with a single reference only.Almandavi (talk) 09:14, 27 June 2025 (UTC) struck confirmed, blocked sockpuppet, Atlantic306 (talk) 22:55, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:41, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Super Sketch

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:BEFORE is [11] [12] [13], which has the same content as The Times of India sources. DareshMohan (talk

) 06:15, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, India, and Telangana. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:02, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:40, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Suraapanam

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:BEFORE found nothing of use: [16] [17]. DareshMohan (talk

) 06:08, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy, Film, and India. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:02, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:40, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Anthaku Minchi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:BEFORE found nothing of use: [20]. DareshMohan (talk

) 06:01, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:03, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:39, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Koran Jakarta

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does not meet WP:Notability in general and the sources that discuss it are very minimal, almost nonexistent. It is not the same as The Jakarta Post and this article has been deleted on idwiki as well. ▪︎ Fazoffic _{( ʖ╎ᓵᔑ∷ᔑ)} 05:20, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly
Talk to my owner
:Online 05:39, 27 June 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and Indonesia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:04, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Delete: per Nom. 🅷🅴🅽🆁🅸 ^{(Let's talk)} ✉ 00:06, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I'm relisting this discussion as the nominator never put an AFD tag on the article so a bot later placed it there. Giving this discussion more time.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:39, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Solstice Coil

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:NBAND. The article relies heavily on primary and niche fan sources. There is very little significant coverage from reliable, independent sources that give any in-depth discussions of the band. They have never been signed to a major record label, their music has never seen any chart success, and there is no clear historical significance of the band, therefore they do not meet the standard of substantial, independent coverage required to establish notability. Magatta (talk

) 05:31, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Comment - the Hebrew Wikipedia article, סולסטיס קויל, cites two Ynet articles.^[21][22] --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 05:36, 27 June 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Israel. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:15, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:37, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

List of Ascendance of a Bookworm light novels

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Same issue as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Ascendance of a Bookworm chapters. Does not pass NLIST, and without the chapter names this would easily fit into the main article. Remove those and merge back. PARAKANYAA (talk) 04:36, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. PARAKANYAA (talk) 04:36, 27 June 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:55, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:36, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Zylog Systems

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article, which was created by a now-banned user, fails

WP:NCORP. It also seems that the company was shut down due to fraud in 2019. 🧙‍♀️ Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs

) 05:15, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Technology, India, and New Jersey. 🧙‍♀️ Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 05:15, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Tamil Nadu. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:03, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Fluentgrid

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:NOTADVERT. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk

) 15:53, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 15:53, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Keep. The article doesn't seem to have any problems. According to
WP:SIRS, it is notable. Earth605 (talk
) 16:40, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Software and Andhra Pradesh. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:33, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Keep, but clean up. The company has potentially hundreds of instances of coverage in reliable sources. This article does it no justice. FalconK (talk) 02:58, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
I am intrigued to hear why you think so? I didn't pull up anything good when I did my quick look so I am curious about your rationale. Moritoriko (talk) 04:01, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Specific source analysis would be helpful
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:27, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

talk
) 04:36, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Delete. No indication of notability. Aneirinn (talk) 04:40, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Adriano Ruchini

Adriano Ruchini (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article does not have
WP:GNG. Aneirinn (talk
) 04:35, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Management, and Italy. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:04, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Freebird Games

AfDs for this article:
Articles for deletion/Freebird Games

Articles for deletion/Freebird Games (2nd nomination)

Freebird Games (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am not convinced Freebird Games passes
WP:NCORP. It has a dearth of coverage about the studio itself that isn't just about the To the Moon
series, which doesn't have similar notability issues.
I do believe that
WP:NARTIST and various sources. [23] [24] However, he is likely notable under his real name for a biography article, not under the studio name for a company article. Thus, it would require a rewrite and has no bearing on this page. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ
) 07:24, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:24, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Canada. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:52, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Redirect How about RPG Maker? I moved all of the informations from Freebird Games wikipedia article into RPG Maker rather than deletion. GeniusTaker (talk) 14:46, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
If it were redirected to RPG Maker, it feels like it would run afoul of
WP:SURPRISE. While To the Moon would be a better target, he also made numerous other games. So it would be better to delete to let the search function do its job, unless a page on Kan Gao were made. If you want to "rescue" the info, I'd suggest making said page using the aforementioned sources, and you could likely merge some of this into it. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ
) 18:12, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
Yeah, technically, I already "rescue" the info. That'll be important is to delete or merge the article before I'll redirect the page into RPG Maker until Kan Gao appears as a Wikipedia page with reliable sources. GeniusTaker (talk) 09:48, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Comment: Well, if Freebied Games is virtually the brand of Kan Gao, would it not be appropriate to rename and repurpose the article instead? IgelRM (talk) 16:28, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
It can't be guaranteed that someone will actually do that after the discussion is concluded. It's better to start a new article at Kan Gao if you wish to transfer the information, then redirecting there would be a valid
WP:ATD. Changing the scope of the article would also be a problem if one day Freebird Games did become independently notable of the creator. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ
) 13:31, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

I'm unsure if this is relevant to WP:NCORP but Kan Gao is not the series "mostly solo dev" as seen here https://freebirdgames.com/about/ on the companies website. Falak89 (talk) 20:14, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
Maybe not, but the listing also doesn't show the devs' relative workload. Regardless, even if he isn't the main developer, it doesn't change my point. Gao is notable, the company isn't. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:08, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

It is not relevant for NCORP. I might have exaggerated but I think a conversion would still be possible. IgelRM (talk) 12:04, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

talk
) 04:32, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Nicole Giannino

AfDs for this article:
Articles for deletion/Nicole Giannino

Articles for deletion/Nicole Giannino (2nd nomination)

Nicole Giannino (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails
WP:GNG; I did some searching and was not able to find significant coverage (either for her acting career or her ice hockey career) in any reliable source Joeykai (talk
) 23:36, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Sportspeople, Women, Film, Television, and Ice hockey. Joeykai (talk) 23:36, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Agree: The CWHL fails
WP:SPORTSCRIT. Combined with the lack of media attention, I regrettably agree that this article should face deletion. That being said, there is something to be said about the inherent notability of someone who has consistently achieved at a high level, even when such achievement doesn't get media attention. Doesn't change my vote, but she is obviously extremely talented, and I dislike the deletion of the article because there isn't sufficient coverage. Unfortunately, we are at the whim of what media decides to cover, and what people decide to care about, and in this case, Women's professional hockey and inline skating is not it. Foxtrot620 (talk
) 01:34, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:59, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Keep Two of the sources in the article, in Pulse magazine [25] and Telegram & Gazette [26], have sigcov of her. They do include interviews with her, but also have info about her career and her life outside hockey (studying biology and speech language pathology, which could be added to this article. RebeccaGreen (talk) 14:48, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Svartner (talk) 03:53, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Dayo Audi

Dayo Audi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A 15 year old unsourced article, the majority of hits when looking up his name are to mirrors or copies of the text from this article. The claim that he won the Mr Universe title in 2008 or any other year is not supported by the linked page. I could determine that he did compete in 2003 [27] where he reached a rather unremarkable 11th. I can't find any trace of the regional, national, European and World titles from three major Federations either. Moritoriko (talk) 03:21, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Sportspeople, and United Kingdom. Moritoriko (talk) 03:21, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Delete. They do not appear to be notable. Aneirinn (talk) 04:52, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Comment Source: [28] Also, he's on the cover of Bodybuilding International from March 1998 "Dayo Audi: Mr. Everything but the universe! Will he enter his year? ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 05:07, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for finding that, isn't much, but still thanks. I can't see the ebay link for some reason but I believe you. You might be interested in trying to find some sources for the numerous sports people in the Category:All unreferenced BLPs where I found this article. Moritoriko (talk) 06:32, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Ombra Tamano

Ombra Tamano (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing coverage that goes beyond campaign, unsuccessful candidate not notable per
WP:POLOUTCOMES Yoblyblob (Talk
) :) 03:20, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Delete. One is not notable just by being a political candidate. Aneirinn (talk) 04:42, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Delete Being a political candidate does not make you notable in any way. An editor from Mars (talk) 06:39, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Medicine, and Philippines. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:05, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Dan Bull

Dan Bull (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails
WP:INTERVIEW but that's all I found. I like the guy's music but he doesn't meet Wikipedia's requirements for an article TheLoyalOrder (talk
) 07:49, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and United Kingdom. TheLoyalOrder (talk) 07:49, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Internet, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:51, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Comment: I am familiar with DB from
WP:RS/PS. I am uncertain how to vote for now, so I will wait for others to give their opinions before settling on a vote. 11WB (talk
) 21:21, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Found a feature from Huck (magazine). IgelRM (talk) 12:15, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 03:01, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Keep - aside from the aforementioned Forbes article and piece in Huck Magazine I've found a short piece in Vice and an interview in Tubefilter, additionally it's a dead link but existing references in the article to Metro and a short piece from Computerandvideogames, all of which are notable outlets with their own articles. Aside from those, coverage of his work in TheNextWeb, an interview in Gizorama and an article from 2012 in VentureBeat. As much as a few of these aren't amazing sources (some veer into failing
WP:INTERVIEW) I think there's enough here to suggest notability. ser! ^{(chat to me - see my edits}
) 12:26, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

The Encounter of a Lifetime

The Encounter of a Lifetime (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

nn Soviet fil --
>talk
03:00, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Russia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:05, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Holborn Adams

Holborn Adams (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet GNG and sounds a bit promotional. Uncle Bash007 (talk) 09:02, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Uncle Bash007 Thank you for your other message and feedback. I created the page because a link existed on another page that was red and didn't go to a page that existed. Wikipedia therefore suggested page creation and I have seen other similar pages so assumed this was fine so long as there are notable references available. The references are all news articles. I have made some changes in line with your feedback to make sure the copy is purely informational. It is not intended to be promotional but factual and I hope this improves it. There were also links on other Wikipedia pages to this page that should now work rather than link to a page that does not exist. Are these improvements suitable? Greenfieldsgreentrees (talk) 09:31, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 09:44, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:50, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Hmm so I'm kind of unsure where to go with this one... On the one hand the topic does seem notable but on the other there do appear to be genuine concerns about promotion with some coverage reading almost as paid (see [29] for example). I would say leaning keep for now with a mind to revisit in a year or two when more editors than just this one have had a crack at the article. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 01:33, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for your feedback @Horse Eye's Back. I created the article because there was a link to this page in red on another page that wasn't working, so Wikipedia suggested article creation. I have made some improvements to it in line with what another editor suggested. I thought that a wider selection of news sources would be useful, which is why that one was used, but I see your point about that coverage reading promotional in tone so I have removed it as I understand the importance of articles being neutral and purely informational. Greenfieldsgreentrees (talk) 07:26, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Agree with points initially raised, but seems to have improved since in tone and news sources, so probably on balance now seems okay to keep. Leverdusoleil91 (talk) 14:00, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 03:01, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Development Fraction

Development Fraction (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only cited reference does not mention a "Development Fraction". It does mention a
WP:GNG Ruud Buitelaar (talk
) 02:58, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Indonesia. Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 02:58, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

del no coverage. Mistranslation? --
>talk
03:04, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:05, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

The 5am Club

The 5am Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails
WP:NBOOK as none of the sources look reliable. All I found in a search were a handful of the very questionable kind of sources you get with a lot of self help books that are questionable independence wise and don't provide any commentary, or are unreliable. I cannot find two reliable reviews. Redirect to Robin Sharma? PARAKANYAA (talk
) 19:31, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. PARAKANYAA (talk) 19:31, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Comment: There is coverage, but it's not about the book as much as it's about the concept of early rising. The book served as a jumping off point, but it's not really the focus of the article exactly. For example, this article in HK Vogue is more about the idea of waking up early with the book as an inspiration. This one from Health Digest does cover the book a bit more, but again it's about the practice not the book itself. Then there's this one by the Times of India which is made up of short bits over a series of images. Not really in-depth. I wasn't about to really look at this from Business Insider but it looks to be more like the Vogue and HD ones. This article by The National (Abu Dhabi) looks to be an actual review, but it's paywalled. I'm also not super familiar with this newspaper to know if it would be usable for reviews or not.

Offhand what I would recommend is that some of the content get selectively merged into the main article for the author and this redirect there. It would need some editing for tone/flow, of course. I might do it if I get the time, but if anyone else wants to do it go for it. I'm going to hold off to see if someone else can find sourcing, but again - offhand the sourcing isn't really about the book in the way that we expect sourcing to go. It's enough that it should be mentioned somewhere, but I don't know that it's enough for its own article. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 23:18, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:52, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

List of Is It Wrong to Try to Pick Up Girls in a Dungeon? On the Side: Sword Oratoria light novels

List of Is It Wrong to Try to Pick Up Girls in a Dungeon? On the Side: Sword Oratoria light novels (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass
WP:NLIST and the main Sword Oratoria article isn't long enough for this to be worth a split out. Merge/redirect back. PARAKANYAA (talk
) 19:36, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Lists. PARAKANYAA (talk) 19:36, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Comment: Is there any merit in adding the content back in and redirecting this to the main article? I do see what you mean by the article being short. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 23:05, 26 June 2025 (UTC)
I concur. I think this would be a logical third option between complete deletion and leaving the page up. Foxtrot620 (talk) 02:33, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:52, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Merge into the main article. It can always be split off again later, if merited. Metallurgist (talk) 03:25, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Elizabeth Tisdahl

Elizabeth Tisdahl (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Former mayor of a city with a population of ~75k. I don't think that's an inherently notable position, and based on the
ROTM news coverage cited, it doesn't seem like Tisdahl rises above any other mayor in terms of notability. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk
) 18:55, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women, and Illinois. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:11, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Keep. The notability of a mayor isn't contingent on the population of the city per se, but on the ability to write and
reliably source content about her work: specific things she did, specific projects she spearheaded, specific effects her leadership had on the development of the city, and on and so forth. Content and sourcing of that type is present here — although obviously more would be welcome if possible, this is already considerably better than the "So-and-so is a mayor who exists, the end" approach that's much more likely to get a mayor's article deleted. Bearcat (talk
) 15:37, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 02:45, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Keep. Satisfied
>talk
03:08, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

FASTCAM Super 10K

FASTCAM Super 10K (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I believe this article fails
WP:GNG, no inline references, the external links mostly link to the same homepage on the company's website. Checked on the internet archive for them and it's mostly company product listing/promo. Can't find much online about it. Could be merged into Photron if appropriate, but may still be unsourced. Encoded Talk 💬
22:51, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Encoded Talk 💬 22:51, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Merge or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 02:43, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

merge to manufacturer. noi independent notability --
>talk
03:11, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Merge with Photron: No evidence of notability for the product itself. Owen× ☎ 07:46, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

FASTCAM Ultima 40K

FASTCAM Ultima 40K (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I believe this article fails
WP:GNG, no inline references, the external links mostly link to the same homepage on the company's website. Checked on the internet archive for them and it's mostly company product listing/promo. Can't find much online about it. Could be merged into Photron if appropriate, but may still be unsourced / only primary sources if deadlines rescued. Encoded Talk 💬
22:52, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Encoded Talk 💬 22:52, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Merge or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 02:43, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

merge to manufacturer. no independent notability --
>talk
03:12, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Merge with Photron: No evidence of notability for the product itself. Owen× ☎ 07:45, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

FASTCAM Ultima 512

FASTCAM Ultima 512 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I believe this article fails
WP:GNG, no inline references, the external links mostly link to the same homepage on the company's website. Checked on the internet archive for them and it's mostly company product listing/promo. Can't find much online about it. Could be merged into Photron if appropriate, but may still be unsourced / only primary sources if deadlines rescued. Encoded Talk 💬
22:52, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Encoded Talk 💬 22:52, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Merge or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 02:42, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

merge to manufacturer. noi independent notability --
>talk
03:11, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Merge with Photron: No evidence of notability for the product itself. Owen× ☎ 07:45, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

PayChangu

PayChangu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unclear notability. The majority of the current sources ([30][31][32][33][34][35][36]) appear to be paid news. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 02:02, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Business, and Technology. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 02:02, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, and Africa. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:06, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

This is a trending fintech company in Malawi that everyone is talking about the sources are from reliable sources like Malawi24.com, nyasatimes and international sources Kalotiking (talk) 08:06, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Delete The available coverage consists mostly of brief award mentions and promotional articles (Malawi Nyasa Times, Malawi24, Showbiz Uganda, Fintech Magazine Africa). These are lightly edited press releases or sponsored content rather than significant independent coverage. No reliable, in-depth secondary sources have been found to establish notability under WP:GNG. Z3r0h3r000 (talk) 08:56, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Keep I am a Malawian writer, and I can confirm that this is currently one of the most trending if not the number one fintech companies in Malawi. I believe it deserves a Wikipedia article. @Tumbuka Arch is a fellow Malawian editor who might be able to help verify this.

Kalotiking (talk) 11:33, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
@Kalotiking. We need sources, not words, that show that this company is notable. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 11:46, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Keep – The article discusses the company’s partnership with a notable bank, which can be verified on the official website of Centenary Bank Malawi:

^[1]

It also mentions awards the company has won. This is supported by another article from National Bank of Malawi (NBM), one of the country’s largest banks:

^[2] The award mentioned is among the most recognized in the country and is based on customer votes, which demonstrates the company’s notability^[3]. Furthermore, the sources used in the article are not just Malawian blogs, but include reputable news outlets and official bank websites Kalotiking (talk) 12:24, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Malawi is very small country it's just getting started with fintech for someone interested in tech like myself my goal is to make sure i take part in writing articles about Malawian fintech and contribute here Kalotiking (talk) 12:28, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

FASTCAM Spectra

FASTCAM Spectra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I believe this article fails
WP:GNG, no inline references, the external links mostly link to the same homepage on the company's website. Can't find much online about it. Could be merged into Photron if appropriate, but may still be unsourced. Encoded Talk 💬
22:49, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Encoded Talk 💬 22:49, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:01, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

merge to manufacturer. no independent notability --
>talk
03:12, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Merge with Photron: No evidence of notability for the product itself. Owen× ☎ 07:48, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

FASTCAM SE

FASTCAM SE (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I believe this article fails
WP:GNG, no inline references, the external links mostly link to the same homepage on the company's website. Can't find much online about it. Might be best to merge into Photron. Encoded Talk 💬
22:47, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Encoded Talk 💬 22:47, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:00, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

merge to manufacturer. noi independent notability --
>talk
03:11, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Merge with Photron: No evidence of notability for the product itself. Owen× ☎ 07:48, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

South Haven, Wabash County, Indiana

South Haven, Wabash County, Indiana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A residential neighborhood of Wabash apparently built in the mid-1950s if you believe the topos. Other than that I could find nothing except real estate stuff and juxtapositions with the place of the same name in Michigan. The Wabash article doesn't list neighborhoods, not that this one is notable anyway, so I don't see a redirect. The location appears to be way off, btw: the older topos that show it indicate it to be a strip pm the area now labelled. Mangoe (talk) 21:29, 26 June 2025 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following articles on Wabash neighborhoods/subdivisions:

Sunnymede, Indiana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Valley Brook, Indiana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Indiana. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:42, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Delete all three - non notable mid century developments, fails GNG. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 16:55, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:49, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

'Delete all lack of notability/substantial info. --
>talk

Tomorrow's Yesterday

Tomorrow's Yesterday (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails
WP:NFILM, nothing found to support notability in a BEFORE DonaldD23 talk to me
01:27, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and United States of America. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:27, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

del fails
>talk
03:15, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Paradha

AfDs for this article:
Articles for deletion/Paradha

Articles for deletion/Paradha (2nd nomination)

Paradha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails
WP:NFILM, nothing found to support notability in a BEFORE DonaldD23 talk to me
01:22, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:22, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Delete No release date announced. The article fails
WP:NFF, and the sources are primarily promotional press releases.2409:40F0:3185:453D:5CBC:276A:DA9F:E1CC (talk
) 11:00, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Dawn Evans

Dawn Evans (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person who, while elected to the state legislature, left the state before taking office, fails GNG. Talthiel (talk) 00:04, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly
Talk to my owner
:Online 00:27, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Keep:
WP:NPOL
says that notability "applies to people who have been elected to such offices but have not yet assumed them". So, even though she never took office, I believe the article has sufficient notability.

Notaoffensivename (talk) 06:14, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women, and New Hampshire. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:07, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Christian Urrutia

Christian Urrutia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lawyer and congressional candidate. He sued on behalf of
run-of-the-mill stories that mention him as a congressional candidate. I'd support a redirect to 2026 United States House of Representatives elections in New Hampshire#District 1. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk
) 00:19, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Redirect. It is best. Aneirinn (talk) 04:47, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Law, Military, Iowa, Michigan, and New Hampshire. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:08, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

2017 XX61

2017 XX61 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable asteroid with zero news and scientific coverage (see Google search). Fails astronomical object notability guidelines
WP:NASTRO. Nrco0e (talk • contribs
) 00:16, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:08, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Forced orgasm

AfDs for this article:
Articles for deletion/Forced orgasm

Articles for deletion/Forced orgasm (2nd nomination)

Forced orgasm (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not seem to be notable. Kinkly looks like a healthline-like site, i.e. unreliable. The Guardian article doesn't mention this and isn't even about it. A search on google scholar shows only passing mentions and unreliable sources. A search on google news does not bring up significant reliable coverage either. KnowDeath (talk) 00:48, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

The previous discussion on this contains no convincing arguments in favour of keeping. KnowDeath (talk) 00:51, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Delete -
WP:INDISCRIMINATE: Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. This is not merely mentioning that this practice exists. This is a mini-instruction guideline with explicit instructions and images of how to do this. — Maile (talk
) 02:05, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:33, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Keep The topic of the article is important and noteworthy from a sexual, medical and perhaps historical point of view. Although the article basically does not refer to this content well, a Google Books search can list many sources. However, unsourced content and unhelpful images should be removed.

Edard Socceryg (talk
) 00:42, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
The topic of the article is important and noteworthy from a sexual, medical and perhaps historical point of view

How? I couldn't find anything that corroborates this and you haven't provided anything either.

a Google Books search can list many sources

All the books I can see are erotica or written by somebody who isn't an academic expert. KnowDeath (talk) 02:49, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Delete - this is a fairly minor topic within BDSM and kink. Most of this short article is unsourced and the sources available look poor, giving little likelihood of improvement in the future. -- Polly Tunnel (talk) 12:38, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 04:23, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Keep I had thought deletion was the answer, but my own searches convinced me otherwise.^[4]^[5]^[6]^[7]

References

^ https://www.centenarybank.co.mw/news/centenary-bank-paychangu-digital-payments-malawi

^ https://malawi24.com/2025/06/13/nbm-plc-promises-customers-more-enjoyable-digital-banking-experience/

^ https://www.nyasatimes.com/paychangu-named-ict-firm-of-the-year-at-ictam-corporate-awards-2025/

doi:10.1007/s10508-021-02156-9
.

doi:10.1177/08862605211073109
.

doi:10.1080/19419899.2022.2060130
.

doi:10.1016/j.jcfm.2003.10.008
.

Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 13:15, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
These are about a different topic, they are not about the BDSM activity. KnowDeath (talk) 21:44, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Delete. The topic of this article ("forced orgasms" as a kink or unconventional consensual sexual practice) appears to be unrelated to what Goldsztajn's sources say, which are about orgasms that are "forced" in the context of conventional (not kinky) sex, or in the context of nonconsensual sex (i.e. rape). I can't see anything in the article that could be substantiated by these sources, at least judging by their abstracts. The article needs deletion as unverifiable or at least not notable on the basis of currently produced sources. Goldsztajn's sources could be used in the article about orgasm instead. Sandstein 18:12, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

There are two different topics that are covered by this subject - coerced, non-consenual sexual activity which produces an orgasm and consensual, play sexual activity that mimics coercion and produces an orgasm. I've already provided sourcing on the former, there is sourcing on the latter.^[1]^[2]^[3]^[4]

References

doi:10.1111/jsm.12835
. There are several ways through which BDSM practices can divert distress away from concerns about sexual functioning, namely an emphasis on practices that require a good display of nongenital technical skills (e.g., flogging, bondage, needle play) and that produce sexual responses on their partners, or contexts where coitus is not even an option, and/or where typical anxiogenic markers of sexual function (such as not having an erection) are positively valued and even fundamental to the role play (e.g., male chastity belts, Cock and Ball Torture [CBT], cock humiliation, forced orgasm)

doi:10.31031/FSAR.2019.05.000608
.

ISBN 9780807020227
.

doi:10.13131/2611-657X.whatever.v4i1.122
. Il suo agire sottomettendosi alle pratiche che le vengono imposte (forced orgasms; double penetration; face-slapping; spanking e bukkake) è in grado di condizionare il contesto e di caratterizzare l'intera scena: l'at-tenzione del pubblico, sia quello performante che quello a cui è rivolto il prodotto finale, è incentrata su di lei.

FWIW, I disagree with the characterisation "nonconsensual sex (i.e. rape)", nonconsensual sex is synonymous with sexual assault, rather than rape. Rape is a relic of criminal law that for far too long lawfully excused sexual assault where penetration could not be proven. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 12:51, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
This article is (ostensibly) about the second topic, not the first. The sources cited above do not persuade me - to the extent I can access them, they merely mention "forced orgasms" among several other sexual practices, rather than describe what they are. This is not the sort of in-depth coverage we need to write a reliable article and to make the topic notable. Sandstein 18:54, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

I agree with Sandstein, I would not consider this
significant coverage, they are just mentions of the term. Additionally, Arielle Greenberg does not seem to be an academic expert in sexology or psychology; and the publisher of the book, Beacon Press, is literally blacklisted on Wikipedia. KnowDeath (talk
) 00:39, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
Actually, the blacklisting might not be relevant. KnowDeath (talk) 00:46, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 15:45, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

(Weak) Merge if there are no reliable sources for this are as thin as what @
Bdsm or any other related articles, but if what @Goldsztajn
said is true, and there is actually more reliable sources then please just entirely ignore my post, because then that gets into whether or not its a notable subject and i have no idea or interest in particiapting in that discussion.

AssanEcho (talk) 21:01, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 00:15, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Socialist Workers Front (Marxist–Leninist)

Socialist Workers Front (Marxist–Leninist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

about this article. Unfortunately, a quick search revealed little that will contribute to its notoriety; the citations are limited and outdated. If more substantial coverage is found, there may be opportunities for improvement. Lolitoo049 (talk) 23:56, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly
Talk to my owner
:Online 00:10, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Delete - Per the Political parties in Panama navbox at the bottom of the article. This is listed in the "Defunct parties". — Maile (talk) 00:35, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and Panama. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:08, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:SpartaN/Delog&oldid=780864543"

[1] ttps://www.centenarybank.co.mw/news/centenary-bank-paychangu-digital-payments-malawi

[2] ttps://malawi24.com/2025/06/13/nbm-plc-promises-customers-more-enjoyable-digital-banking-experience/

[3] ttps://www.nyasatimes.com/paychangu-named-ict-firm-of-the-year-at-ictam-corporate-awards-2025/

[4] :10.1007/s10508-021-02156-9
.

[5] :10.1177/08862605211073109
.

[6] :10.1080/19419899.2022.2060130
.

[7] :10.1016/j.jcfm.2003.10.008
.

[8] :10.1111/jsm.12835
. There are several ways through which BDSM practices can divert distress away from concerns about sexual functioning, namely an emphasis on practices that require a good display of nongenital technical skills (e.g., flogging, bondage, needle play) and that produce sexual responses on their partners, or contexts where coitus is not even an option, and/or where typical anxiogenic markers of sexual function (such as not having an erection) are positively valued and even fundamental to the role play (e.g., male chastity belts, Cock and Ball Torture [CBT], cock humiliation, forced orgasm)

[9] :10.31031/FSAR.2019.05.000608
.

[10] ISBN 9780807020227
.

[11] :10.13131/2611-657X.whatever.v4i1.122
. Il suo agire sottomettendosi alle pratiche che le vengono imposte (forced orgasms; double penetration; face-slapping; spanking e bukkake) è in grado di condizionare il contesto e di caratterizzare l'intera scena: l'at-tenzione del pubblico, sia quello performante che quello a cui è rivolto il prodotto finale, è incentrata su di lei.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]