User talk:Artemis Andromeda

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• The Teahouse, our help forum for new users
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! HiLo48 (talk) 23:39, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message @

talk) 09:49, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

I have reverted you edit op Świt (song). With as summary: restored technical trick to fool a maintenance bot. This keeps the page out of maintenance lists. The Banner talk 20:57, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome Artemis Andromeda! Thank you for your contributions related to Poland. You may be interested in visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland, joining the project, joining our discussions and sharing your creations with our community.

--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:08, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message mate :)

talk) 11:12, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:27, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This should not be done, see

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mr. Zoob is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. Zoob until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

–

An article you recently created,

An article you recently created,

The article Bix Aliu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not enough in-depth coverage to pass

WP:NPOL

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:24, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

The article Jakub Dębski has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing

WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus

. Thank you.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:10, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ezlev was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Monument of Railwayman, Szczecin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Monument of Railwayman, Szczecin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ezlev.^talk 20:56, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheEditMate! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ezlev.talk 20:56, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent articles, including

]

Nomination of

Franek Dolas

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Franek Dolas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't add nonexistent categories to articles, as you did to Biokovsko Selo and many others today. Either create the category first, or don't add it. Thanks. PamD 17:58, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kazimierz Zakrzewski (military officer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing

WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus

. Thank you.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:42, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your work. You could help us when you translate a page into English by not linking to common terms such as "village". Also, we don't normally link years or dates, and flag icons are usually not included in infoboxes (perhaps sports excluded from that). Tony (talk) 09:54, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lists of roads named after fictional characters has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Misiek1997 (talk) 08:09, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

An article you recently created,

Hallo, Thank you for creating Kravica (river). When you create an article like this with a "disambiguated" title, please make sure that the reader can find it from the basic name (ie Kravica), by adding or expanding a hatnote, or adding the article to a disambiguation page. This helps the reader to find your article, and also reduces the chance of a future careless editor creating a duplicate article with a slightly different disambiguator. I've fixed this one. Thanks, and Happy Editing. PamD 22:19, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PLease read and take note: the same applies to Colony (Poland) which you created today. Thanks. PamD 22:30, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

An article you recently created,

Hi. I actually did, but I'm not really sure which one is the more recognized version of the name. An additional problem is that a lot of internet results seem to literally quote Wikipedia, saying "Wymysorys, also known as Vilamovian", which complicates determining the name. It seems like term "Wymysorys" is more popular, including, amoung sources already uses by the Wikipedia article itself. Yet the name "Vilamovian" still seems to be in use, being used for example by Google (https://artsandculture.google.com/entity/vilamovian-language/m038xbg?hl=en), though I don't know if this is an official decision made by the Google team or rather automated or community decision. Also, I see it being used by Wikiprojects in an inconsistent way, including Wikidictionary using the name "Vilamovian" (https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Category:Vilamovian_language).

talk) 14:55, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Phasael II is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phasael II until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mccapra (talk) 06:00, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Herod VI has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Despite the numbers after his name, Herod VI was not a ruler. He was a minor member of the family of Herod the Great who never reigned. All the information we have about him is genealogical so he definitely isn’t notable. This belongs in a family tree and not in a stand alone article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 06:01, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

An article you recently created,

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kazimierz Zakrzewski (military officer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kazimierz Zakrzewski (military officer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:23, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent articles, including

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:53, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bix Aliu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bix Aliu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 04:14, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

]

		The Polish Barnstar of National Merit, 2nd Class
		On behalf of WP:POLAND, I award you the Polish Barnstar of National Merit, 2nd Class. Thank you for your efforts! Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:38, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply ]
		this WikiAward was given to TheEditMate by Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here on 06:38, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have undone your cut-and-paste page move

An article you recently created,

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Battle of Gniewkowo instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be

proposed for deletion

.

If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.

There are both a draft and an article on this subject. The article was created after a previous version of the article was moved into draft space for

verifiability

concerns. The current article has reliable sources and has been reviewed by a new page reviewer, so the verifiability concerns appear to have been addressed.

This draft will be redirected to the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Battle of Gniewkowo
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  Draft:Battle of Gniewkowo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 21:36, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Flag of Provo, Utah, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. SounderBruce 00:52, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Abelard Giza instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be

proposed for deletion

. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Abelard Giza
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  Draft:Abelard Giza, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:08, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

In the future, Artemis, if you disagree with a move to Draft space, please move the article back rather than doing a cut-and-paste recreation of the article. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:51, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

Please discuss at talk page what notability in external news sources has increased for Jaiden since the February 2021 version.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Jaiden Animations
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  Draft:Jaiden Animations, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 22:36, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent articles, including

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:37, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Artemis Andromeda,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 16:36, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @John B123:. I want to disagree. I copied the text in question from the article Mieszko II Lambert. The said article was by itself translated (mostly without majoir changes) from Polish article. If anything, the page https://www.geni.com/people/Mieszko-II-Lambert-king-of-Poland/6000000000768959047 that was marked as "orignal" copied its text from Wikipedia. It even gives links to Wikipedia articles and have classical source markers such as "[1]" within its text, clearly showing that text was copy pasted from Wikipedia.

Example: "...he married with Richeza (Ryksa),[2] daughter ...". I hope, that this misunderstanding will be fixed soon. Artemis Andromeda (talk) 16:42, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Artemis Andromeda — per John B123's message, it would be helpful if you could go back into the articles in which you've copied content and make a dummy edit with the summary copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution in order to comply with Wikipedia's licensing requirements. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 03:04, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

Draft:Biała County, Kingdom of Galicia and Lodomeria. Thanks! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 17:30, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Biała County, Kingdom of Galicia and Lodomeria, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

K.e.coffman (talk) 18:10, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:09, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:10, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

@Artemis Andromeda: - Thank you for your contribution to the articles you have made on Poland, notably the Duchies and Kingdoms. However, I do see certain problems. Firstly, these are so-called WP:Stub articles which are quote "too short to provide encyclopedic coverage of a subject". Such articles should be avoided, moreover the number of these create nothing more but confusion. One should not be copying information from other pages related to the subject and pasting them into brand new articles, which subsequently become duplicates. The increasing number of these articles hurts the credibility of Wikipedia as a whole. Deleting your articles would undermine the work you have done and, after all, these are sourced. I'd suggest merging these into a single 'Kingdom of Poland' and a single 'Duchy of Poland'. The difference between all the duchies and kingdoms is minimal really. All the information you included would be then placed under appropriate headings in the history section. Merangs (talk) 09:09, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please see also discussion

WT:POLAND. This topic (periodization and naming of articles) was also extensively discussed 10+ years ago (see for example Wikipedia:WikiProject History of Poland/Periodization), so we should not make changes such as splitting an article into pieces and turning it into a redirect without a discussion. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:45, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

An article you recently created,

An article you recently created,

You write many cool articles. Why don't you want to promote them at

Hello. Thank you for your nice words :) . It's really nice to hear that you like them. About DYK. Honestly, I don't know how to explain it. I feel that I just felt that I didn't know how to properly promote them, nor, which part of them would be the interesting "did you know" part. I always was saying to myself that I will do it eventually but I never did. Unfortunately, as I read now, I see, that only new articles are eligible, so I guess I missed my chance :( Artemis Andromeda (talk) 10:35, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, last 7 days or so. It's good to start now. Sometimes simple is better. Such as "... that the 10th century Polish–Veletian War ended up with the destruction of Veletians and Polish conquest of Pomerania?" _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:59, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

They weren't destroyed. Idk if I did mixed something up in article? Their army in the war got destoryed, and Mieszko conquered much of Western Pomerania. But the most eastern territories of Veneti still were under their controll and they still were active (they even had another wars with Poland and Germany later on). Artemis Andromeda (talk) 13:04, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:19, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:17, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

]

Placenames

You deleted several relevant foreign placenames from the lead of Polish cities. Regarding historic German placenames there is a well established consensus as defined by the "Gdansk vote" ("For Gdansk and other locations that share a history between Germany and Poland, the first reference of one name in an article should also include a reference to other names")

This page is affected by the Gdańsk (Danzig) Vote . The following rules apply in the case of disputes: For Gdańsk, use the name Danzig between 1308 and 1945 For Gdańsk, use the name Gdańsk before 1308 and after 1945 In biographies of clearly German persons, the name should be used in the form Danzig (Gdańsk) and later Danzig exclusively In biographies of clearly Polish persons, the name should be used in the form Gdańsk (Danzig) and later Gdańsk exclusively. For Gdansk and other locations that share a history between Germany and Poland, the first reference of one name in an article should also include a reference to other names, e.g. Danzig (now Gdańsk, Poland) or Gdańsk (Danzig). An English language reference that primarily uses this name should be provided on the talk page if a dispute arises. Reverts to conform with community consensus are excluded from the three-revert rule (3RR). Only the place names can be reverted exempt from the 3RR according to the outcome of this vote, additional changes fall again under the 3RR. Please use descriptive edit summaries. Persistent reverts against community consensus despite multiple warnings may be dealt with according to the rules in Wikipedia:Dealing with vandalism. In case of doubt, assume good faith and do not bite newcomers . The detailed vote results and the vote itself can be found on Talk:Gdansk/Vote/discussion anytime. This template {{Gdansk-Vote-Notice }} can be added on the talk page of affected articles if necessary.

Even without the Gdansk vote relevant foreign names wouldn't be placed just in a footnote (

I didn't remove anything. In fact, if you would check, in many cases,I have expanded those lists. I put them in the notes with template:efn, simply because they were creating too long lists to display together. I'm fully supportive of putting foreign names with articles names. Artemis Andromeda (talk) 09:30, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I still don't see a reason to ignore

WP:PLACENAME and the Gdansk vote. We do not hide these names in footnotes. It's rather contradictory to "expand those lists" and giving "too long lists" as a rationale to remove these lists you just created from the lead. Please respect the long established WP:consensus. HerkusMonte (talk) 12:01, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

If you haven't noticed, lists done with efn template are gaining popularity and are better, as they don't clutter the opening sentence of the article with tens of names, for example in

Kosciuszko Uprising. Also, I'm not "hiding" anything, they are all easily accessible and visible in the notes. You just got to click on the [a].Artemis Andromeda (talk) 13:02, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

I haven't noticed a gaining popularity of the efn template for placenames. Currently

WP:PLACENAME represents the established consensus of how to deal with relevant foreign placenames. You might take your proposal to the respective talk page, for now you should just stop deleting relevant foreign names from the lead section. HerkusMonte (talk) 16:21, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

]

Response to third opinion request:

I am responding to a third opinion request for this page. I have made no previous edits on User:Artemis Andromeda and have no known association with the editors involved in this discussion. The third opinion process is informal and I have no special powers or authority apart from being a fresh pair of eyes.

WT:PLACENAME. Examples of articles that use efn for the foreign place name lists will be helpful, especially examples created by other editors. I have this user talk page on my watchlist for at least the next 90 days and will be happy to add clarifications or respond to questions. Please ping me if this discussion proceeds at a different page. Thank you for seeking out a third opinion. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 18:14, 20 September 2021 (UTC) Firefangledfeathers (talk) 18:14, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply ]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Flag of Szczecin instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be

proposed for deletion

. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Flag of Szczecin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Flag of Szczecin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:41, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from adding any kind of Indic scripts per

An article you recently created,

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

I was thinking about translating this, but it is has no footnotes on pl wiki, and I ham having trouble finding sources. Maybe you'd have better luck? _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:32, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @

And about finding more sources, 2 of my tricks when it comes to Medival-Ages-related artucles are: 1. Look into Wikipedia articles about the rulers of the states that took part in the war (so Boleslaw the Brave, the king of Poland, and whoever was the Holly Roman Emperor empiror at the time + smaller HRE dukes who participated in the war). The articles should mention the war and maybe have some sources you can use. 2. When it comes to Polish leaders you can check poczet.com and zamki.name. Both websites list chronologically every events from lifes of Polish rulers, which indlude wars and international politics. Also, zamki.com always quote their sources, so you can write entire artiles just basing on that. Also, they sometimes have articles about wars.

Sincerely, Artemis Andromeda (talk) 18:47, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:26, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

When creating catgories, such as Category:States and territories disestablished in 1264, you need to ensure you also create all the catgories of which they are a part. Do you plan to do so, or leave it to other editors to clean up after you? UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:14, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Well ok, I will start creating those as well. I didn't know. But, can I also ask you to stop deleting categories like "States and territories [dis]established in X", and removing them from articles.Artemis Andromeda (talk) 13:19, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, and will do, but there have been extensive discussions at

WP:CFD as to whether specific-year precision is an appropriate categorization for events happening prior to the Renaissance, with most of those discussions concluding "No". UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:30, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Go over your created articles and follow best practices outlined at #WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages . With a cherry on top? _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:58, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Artemis Andromeda: Could you please tell me why this flying officer is notable? scope_creep^Talk 23:16, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And this as well Jan Kowalski (RAF officer). Thanks. scope_creep^Talk 23:19, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I think I known why Jan Kowalski (RAF officer) is notable, but not Arsen Cebrzyński. Can you give me an idea why you think he is notable. scope_creep^Talk 11:13, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mr. Zoob is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. Zoob (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

scope_creep^Talk 11:23, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:41, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Republic of Mosina, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Artem.G (talk) 18:16, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Żywiec Zdrój requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PamD 16:07, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that the spelling is references, not refrences - I've had to correct it at

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:05, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your articles. But :) In addition to repeating my request to use wikiproject talk assessment templates, please note how to display Polish (or another language) spelling properly. Cheers, _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:02, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mirza Bohdanowicz's Tatar Banner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing

WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus

. Thank you.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:24, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

An article you recently created,

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Panama Canal Zone, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the

@Sumanuil: I want to note that your edits, that were deleting my hard work (and which you did beacuse of one minnor typo), were also done with no comment what so ever. Artemis Andromeda (talk) 00:32, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Really, don't you find it counterproductive to delete an edit with almost +1000 new characters, just over one changed character. Don't you think it was less destructive to just fix the problem with the file, or inform me that the file got broken by accident? Artemis Andromeda (talk) 00:35, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Artemis Andromeda, I was just checking through a list of DYK nominations that had never been transcluded on the Nominations page, and ran across your nomination from the beginning of October. Oddly, despite the fact that you never transcluded the nomination on the DYK Nominations page, Piotrus somehow found the nomination and reviewed it; they also passed it. However, since the nomination had never been transcluded, it was never seen by potential promoters, and it still has not appeared on the Wikipedia main page in the DYK section.

Are you still interested in this nomination continuing? If so, I'll be happy to make sure it is placed on the Approved page and made available to prep set builders. Please let me know how you'd like me to proceed. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:31, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I'm sorry to hear, that there was an issue with my nomination. I am not particularly good when it comes to operating on templates and nominations, so I can imagine I must have done something wrong while nominating the page. Yes, I am still interested in nominating the page. Thank you very much :) Artemis Andromeda (talk) 14:55, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was probably looking at AA's contributions and didn't notice the transclusion wasn't finished... AA, I recommend using the script I link above (#Featuring your work on Wikipedia's front page: DYKs), it will ensure no manual errors happen. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:35, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Piotrus: Thank you. BTW, if you want to shorten my name, you can call me Arty :) Artemis Andromeda (talk) 11:40, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Artemis Andromeda, please note that there is still some work that needs to be done on the nomination. The details are on the DYK nomination page linked above; stop by as soon as you can. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:56, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda,

Thank you for creating Peasant Group of Popular Councils.

This article needs more references to meet significant coverage and notability for organisations.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 07:00, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:30, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:31, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

]

Some baklava for you!

Hi thanks for creating 17. województwo. When making use in en.wiki of material from another wiki, we have to add a template to the talk page so there us proper attribution for copyright reasons. I’ve added the template to the talk page so you can reuse it for future articles. All the best Mccapra (talk) 19:57, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

I disagree. It has plenty of sources for article of its lenght, and its notable, as a historical state subdivision, and autonomous region.Artemis Andromeda (talk) 15:23, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

On 22 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Zdzisław Najmrodzki, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Zdzisław Najmrodzki, a thief in 1970s–1980s Poland, escaped from law-enforcement authorities and prisons on 29 occasions? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Zdzisław Najmrodzki. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Zdzisław Najmrodzki), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:38, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:52, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:05, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ([6] [7] [8] [9]) I propose that you revert yourself and discuss the issue on the article's talk page. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 17:33, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Duchy of Poland (c. 960–1025) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duchy of Poland (c. 960–1025) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Marcelus (talk) 23:28, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 19:06, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:39, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:40, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:40, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Artemis Andromeda. I found this article on

For now, I've moved the article to

Przepaska to move it out of harm's way, although as said I don't think that's a permanent solution, and put Wingcloth up for deletion as a non-existent word. The formal notification is below, to tick the boxes. All best, Ingratis (talk) 06:07, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Wingcloth and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 26#Wingcloth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Ingratis (talk) 06:07, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

]

Your draft article,

Draft:Battle of Kopystrzyń

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Battle of Kopystrzyń

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:33, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:08, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Thank you for creating Wartislaw II of Gdańsk.

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:25, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000: Thank you very much <3 :) Artemis Andromeda (talk) 09:32, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda

Thank you for creating Lower Prussia.

Good start. I marked it as reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:38, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:16, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda

Thank you for creating Lwów Voivodeship (1944–1945).

Hi, you seem to have the same image in two different place. Is the gallery actually needed.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creepTalk 17:17, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:19, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:10, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda,

If you move an article from main space to User space or Draft space, please tag the original for speedy deletion, CSD R2 so admins can spot it and delete the page. Tagging pages for deletion is made easy if you use

Template:Subdivisions of Szczecin 1954–1976 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:38, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

Hello, Artemis Andromeda

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username EchidnaLives, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|EchidnaLives}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

echidnaLives - talk - edits 23:15, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Artemis Andromeda,

Congratulations! You won the second prize in the main category of Wikimedia CEE Spring 2022. In order to claim your voucher worth €50, please contact Manfred Werner.

Best regards.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:00, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the

]

Flag of Ursus

The article

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the

]

Flag of Targówek

The article

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the

I see you're the one who added Perry the Platypus to the Fictional asexuals category. It makes no sense for something to be categorized based on something that's not even mentioned in the article. Can you please add relevant information, with a citation, to the text of the article? Allthegoodnamesaretaken2 (talk) 04:01, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Allthegoodnamesaretaken2: It was said in the article. Perry is confirmed to be asexual by Dan Povenmire (show co-creator). I guess that somebody removed that from the article. It's still lised on articles such as List of fictional asexuals Artemis Andromeda (talk) 04:11, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flag of Elbląg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flag of Elbląg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:05, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Flag of Białołęka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flag of Białołęka until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:26, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 23:10, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda,

Thank you for creating Pawelekville.

Hello, thanks for creating the article. Could you add more references to it?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Rejoy2003}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

✠ Rejoy2003 ✠ (contact) 11:21, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work on Pawelekville. Happy editing

✠ Rejoy2003 ✠ (contact) 14:50, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wikipedia logo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swedish.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. Thank you for your work on

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 09:11, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Polish flags, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Central Lithuania.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. Thank you for your work on

Thanks for creating this article! Hopefully you will write more articles! Have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 00:37, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. Thank you for your work on

Thanks for creating the article! Have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:00, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

East Polish Soviet Socialist Republic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East Polish Soviet Socialist Republic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Marcelus (talk) 18:49, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:26, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:29, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Sirish has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 19 § Sirish until a consensus is reached. An anonymous username, not my real name 02:43, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. Thank you for your work on

Nice job at filling the article out and sourcing.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:06, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969: Thank you very much :)

An article you recently created,

An article you recently created,

Hello. You recently made a change to the coat of arms of poland page in which you removed an image of the King of Poland in wearing, amongst other things, a heraldic tabard. I don’t necessarily disagree with this change, however, you didn’t leave any edit summary, so I’m mildly interested in why you thought this change was necessary. notadev (talk) 04:20, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @NotADev:. I did it because the template isn't to showcase old Middle Ages painting. It is to show .svg file depicting current coat of arms. It should be only for that. And any images there should depict current coat of arms and its variants. Artemis Andromeda (talk) 12:10, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose so, yeah. I didn’t add that image to infobox, however seeing as various other coats of arms pages display a heralds tabard on the infobox it seemed to myself as a useful depiction to include on the infobox, but since such doesn’t exist for Poland it doesn’t really make sense. Nonetheless thank you for taking the time to answer. notadev (talk) 16:44, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop moving these to English translations. This is not mandated by

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Służewiec, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ksawerów.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. Thank you for your work on

Hi. This is close, but it could use an additional in-depth source (or 2).

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:16, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

An article you recently created,

I doubt paih.gov.pl is an independent source, since it is a gov. website. New Challenge is not independent either. Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 02:36, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Polish Chamber of Commerce Australia. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 06:36, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

An article you recently created,

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:11, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		The Polish Barnstar of National Merit, 2nd Class
		For your ongoing efforts to improve Polish-related topics, I award you The Polish Barnstar of National Merit, 2nd Class Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:38, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
		this WikiAward was given to Artemis Andromeda by Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here on 13:38, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Piotrus: Thank you :) Artemis Andromeda (talk)

		The Content Creativity Barnstar
		Skarpa Puławska was a very good article, thank you! Dylan | ✉ | ✓  23:59, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Artemis Andromeda, I've noticed you have moved a few Polish town/village articles. I don't have any problems with the moves themselves, but when you do so, can you please make sure that you update the relevant navigation template (located at the bottom of each article), and, if needed, update or remove the DEFAULTSORT entry? Thanks, Kiwipete (talk) 05:36, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Sowng has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 3 § Sowng until a consensus is reached. CycloneYoris ^talk! 10:04, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Lunye has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 3 § Lunye until a consensus is reached. CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:07, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Érete has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 3 § Érete until a consensus is reached. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:09, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect 'Rrta has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 3 § 'Rrta until a consensus is reached. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:10, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Erosh has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 3 § Erosh until a consensus is reached. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:11, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Pomang has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 3 § Pomang until a consensus is reached. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:11, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Da Belte has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 3 § Da Belte until a consensus is reached. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:11, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Belte has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 3 § Belte until a consensus is reached. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:12, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

I know this is from long ago, but I noticed that on this revision from December 2022, you added some quotes. However, I noticed that they had some weird CSS styling that made some of the text gray. (<span style{{=}}"color:gray">)

I removed it just now, but can I ask what that was about? Was it intentional? --QuickQuokka ^{[⁠talk • contribs]} 19:03, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @QuickQuokka:. I'm sorry, I'm not even sure where exactly in the text would that be (it was a big edit long time ago). But, if you mean the tables; I didn't make them. I used/modified existing tables. I'm not really good in CSS coding and can't make things like that myself. Ad such, I don't really know why it was there. Artemis Andromeda (talk) 19:50, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Artemis Andromeda: I don't mean the tables, I mean some of the quotes. See the revision where I removed it to understand what I'm talking about. --QuickQuokka ^{[⁠talk • contribs]} 20:14, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@QuickQuokka: Ah, I see now. It was done by somebody else in article Wikipedia:Wikipedia logos. I coppied it to the main article. The grey was there to indicate that that portion of text that was visible in the logo (portion of the text was obscured/morthed beyond readability). Artemis Andromeda (talk) 20:24, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Artemis Andromeda: Oh, that makes sense! But I think it should be clearly indicated in the article somehow. --QuickQuokka ^{[⁠talk • contribs]} 20:29, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Maybe we could just say that the coloured part indicates the readable portion of the quote, present in the logo Artemis Andromeda (talk) 20:58, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. Thank you for your work on

Hello! I want to inform you that I have checked your article and mark it as reviewed. Have a good day and thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:01, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1702 establishments in Poland has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 13:24, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Martian Congressional Republic. has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 4 § Martian Congressional Republic. until a consensus is reached. TompaDompa (talk) 22:47, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda,

Thank you for creating Gavius Bassus.

Thank you for creating the article. I have tagged it as a stub. Please consider expanding the page. Often if an article is created as a stub it stays that way for a long time.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Lightburst}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Lightburst (talk) 04:03, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Coat of arms of Pomerania, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Coat of arms of Pomerania, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL" error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

]

August 2023

A page you created has been nominated for deletion because it is a biography of a living person that is entirely negative in tone and contains unsourced content, according to

section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion

.

Do not create

@Sphilbrick:

Um, excuse me, what do you mean? First of all, you failed to provide any information what article you are talking about. Second of all, I put time and effort into writing articles, and I always make sure they are of good quality, and I only include sourced information in my articles. So, please, keep this baseless and unsolicited accusations like this to yourself. Artemis Andromeda (talk) 16:22, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey AA. Sphilbrick made a mistake and reverted themselves at Belter Creole. I think they just forgot or didn't notice that this automated message came your way. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:49, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't realize it created the automated edit. I was testing something, and went one step further than I intended. I corrected my error less than a minute after making it. I thought I caught it before it sent you this message. S Philbrick(Talk) 18:56, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Service de police de la Ville de Montréal. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. https://montreal.ca/en/departments/service-de-police-de-la-ville-de-montreal The link I referred to in my edit summary. IDK which of us is right about which should be the title, but it should really be discussed first per

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kowalscy kontra Kowalscy, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

• İstiklal Marşı / L'Abidjanaise - no evidence English sources predominantly use a translated title for these
• Service de sécurité incendie de Montréal - similar, seems to be known by the French name even in English.
• Partisan (film) - only film of this name on Wikipedia, and I don't see other notable ones, so the year is not needed.

Please use

THanks  — Amakuru (talk) 12:41, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making controversial moves, as you did at

WP:RM rather than reinstating the contested move.  — Amakuru (talk) 22:13, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Izabela Dąbrowska, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:49, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Edward-Woodrow}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hello, Artemis Andromeda, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Lightburst, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created,

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Lightburst (talk) 19:22, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Głusza, Wałcz County is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Głusza, Wałcz County until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Please, please, PLEASE do not create any more placename articles from Registr TERYT or similar databases. These databases have proven to have serious issues in other countries, and the same appears to be the case here. Mangoe (talk) 04:14, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Kiedrowice (hamlet) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiedrowice (hamlet) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 19:44, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Luboń (hamlet), Pomeranian Voivodeship is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luboń (hamlet), Pomeranian Voivodeship until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 07:19, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Dzwonowo (hamlet), Wałcz County is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dzwonowo (hamlet), Wałcz County until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 08:56, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mokradła, West Pomeranian Voivodeship is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mokradła, West Pomeranian Voivodeship until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 15:22, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Embassy of Kuwait, Warsaw is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of Kuwait, Warsaw until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 17:34, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beautiful and Unemployed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beautiful and Unemployed until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:45, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. Thank you for your work on

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:36, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. Thank you for your work on

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:39, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn:, Thank you :) I know it is a very late response, and I don't know if I should even bother you with this message after such a long time. But I have realized that I never responded despite receiving numerous positive notes from you, for which I am sorry. Thank you for reading and liking my articles Artemis Andromeda (talk) 01:22, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ernest Malinowski Monument, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Anna Maria Żukowska, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Anna Maria Żukowska, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Anna Maria Żukowska, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:11, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 16:31, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. It has been over six months since you last edited the