User talk:Bradford/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

In response to your feedback

Thank you for your feedback and thank you for your contributions! For more help on getting started, please look at Help desk and the help pages.


Cheers,

talk) No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 05:26, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

 

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo
Hello! Bradford, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! heather walls (talk) 04:58, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

Your addition to Ross Lynch has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Uploading someone else's photo to your flickr account then using that as a source for the image on commons does not give you ownership of the photo. It is still copyrighted by the original photographer. Geraldo Perez (talk) 06:37, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to

automated computer program called ClueBot NG
.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at

Wanderer 21:37, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Impersonation

Hello, please remove the administrator category and topicon from your user page as impersonating an administrator is highly frowned upon and blockable. Thank you for the kitty though, I will take good care of it. Cheers,

talk No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 04:16, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Thank you for your interest in editing Wikipedia. Your edit to

welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. I don't have an account on the es wiki... Theopolisme TALK 20:22, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Some essential reading for you:

  • This
  • This

and

I hope it helps. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:07, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, nonfree images aren't permitted to be displayed in userspace, but a link to the image is fine. Nyttend (talk) 20:06, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The unfree image placed in my post by DJMalik has been removed. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:25, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relaciones Peligrosas !

Thanks for the compliment & greetings. I do whatever I can to maintain them in a professional level by adding useful content with valid sources. You'll see me around articles remotely related to Univision, Telemundo, Televisa, and a little bit of Venevision and TV Azteca.

talk) 00:23, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Possible disruptive editing

Malik, I suggest you really do take time to read the pages I linked you to. It may save you from awkward situations in the future. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:28, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jon Ecker

The article

reliable source
that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Eeekster (talk) 21:45, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Que mal

Bradford • 21:56, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

 

Consider adding other sources aside from IMDb to verify the biographical information such as birth place and birth date. SwisterTwister talk 22:43, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

Dulce Amargo, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Romance, Chilean and Roxana Díaz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Name change

Hi, I'm handling your name change request. Do you have access to Gael on any other Wikimedia projects? MBisanz talk 03:01, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

El Señor de los Cielos, episodes

Good question. According to these websites, no official titles exist for episodes 19 and onwards, which is why "Capítulo ##" was used as an alternative. I don't think that episode descriptions, such as in the last episode (Aurelio Casillas muere al intentar cambiarse el rostro) would make a good substitution for Capítulo ##, unless that's allowed.

talk) 04:34, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

I was thinking about removing that section since episode titles are unused, unless Telemundo chooses to use them again, which will force me to restore the episode title section.
talk) 04:49, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
For Marido en alquiler and Santa Diabla, they don't need consideration. As for the other ones (Pasion prohibida, Dama y Obrero, El se~nor de los cielos, etc with no episode titles), I'll think about it.

Disambiguation link notification for August 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Raúl Méndez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Lynch, Fidel, Laguna, Cristiada, Mexican and Manuel Carballo

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gabriel Coronel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Elizabeth Gutiérrez may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • como Analía en el Rostro de Analía"]</ref> || Ana Lucía Moncada / Mariana Andrade de Montiel[ || <center>— </center>

Thanks,

talk) 09:58, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Elizabeth Gutiérrez may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • como Analía en el Rostro de Analía"]</ref> || Ana Lucía Moncada / Mariana Andrade de Montiel[ || <center>— </center>

Thanks,

talk) 09:59, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kimberly Dos Ramos may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • '''Kimberly Dos Ramos De Sousa''' <ref name="IMDb"/> (born April 15, 1992 is an [[actress]], [[entertainer]], [[Model (profession)|model]] and [[singer]]
  • 2011|author=Varios|fecha=|work=Wikipedia, la enciclopedia libre|language=Español}}</ref>''[[Grachi]'' achieved in its opening day in the country of Mexico a total of 10.7 points in audience

Thanks,

talk) 06:19, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Marido en Alquiler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver
)
added a link pointing to Rafael Pérez
Maritza Rodríguez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver
)
added a link pointing to RCN

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Kimberly Dos Ramos (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Model and Perfectionism
Gabriel Porras (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to La Reina del Sur

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:27, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kimberly Dos Ramos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Musical (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

)
added a link pointing to Roxana Díaz
Marido en Alquiler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver
)
added a link pointing to Anthony Lopez

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Camaleones, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pee Wee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Marido En Alquiler

PITBULL MR 305 (talk) 23:14, 23 October 2013 (UTC) Argentina does not use pm/am. Venezuela too. The one and only country in the world that use pm/am is the United States. So why in the case of Argentina, Panama, Mexico and Dominican Republic you didn't write pm, and you write it only for Venezuela? What's the point?[reply]

Dama y Obrero

PITBULL MR 305 (talk) 23:24, 23 October 2013 (UTC) Is it a lie that Dama y Obrero finished? If not, then why you reverted my edit on it? For every other telenovela of Telemundo here on Wikipedia the last episode is written not with № or name, but with Gran final, like Relaciones peligrosas, for example - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relaciones_Peligrosas . So why you reverted my edit on it?[reply]

La impostora (the cast)

You can confirm it by going to official twitter pages of those actors. I don't think they would lie about being in this telenovela. You will also find pictures from the set there. I tried to put references, but they don't work. I guess I don't know how to do it properly. [1] [2] By the way, telenovela premieres in december. If you don't believe me now, in december you will see that they are a part of the cast yourself :) Mickie777 (talk) 01:53, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kimberly Dos Ramos

Hello. Although the English translation is extremely difficult to read, I'll leave alone the very badly translated, redundant article that has too much unnecessary information. (No translation is better than a bad translation.) Unfortunately the English article reflects badly on Srta Dos Ramos.Rose1909 (talk) 08:55, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

La Tempestad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Televicentro and RTL 2
Camaleones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Lolita (song)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Christian de la Campa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christian de la Campa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian de la Campa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. And Adoil Descended (talk) 10:34, 30 October 2013 (UTC) And Adoil Descended (talk) 10:34, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Christian de la Campa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Model
La Reina del Sur (telenovela) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver
)
added a link pointing to Televicentro

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Marco de Paula (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to TVE
Marido en Alquiler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver
)
added a link pointing to Sophie Charlotte

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gabriel Coronel, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Format, Release and Digital download (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Christian de la Campa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christian de la Campa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian de la Campa (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. And Adoil Descended (talk) 19:14, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

List of Marido en Alquiler cast members, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anthony Lopez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Premios People en Español (2013) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • |}
  • |}

Thanks,

talk) 09:39, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Premios People en Español (2013) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • |}
  • |}

Thanks,

talk) 09:43, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Premios People en Español (2013) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Showbiz and William Levy
Gaby Espino (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Enamorada

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Suelta La Sopa

Hi, I'm FairyTailRocks. DJMalik, thanks for creating Suelta La Sopa!

I've just tagged the page, using our

WP:GNG
.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

the Teahouse. FairyTailRocks (talk) 14:37, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Disambiguation link notification for December 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paola Núñez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Producer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

It looks that you're the only one who can make edits on telenovelas pages, because you revert everything other users puts. And those users usually puts confirmed information, the same information you put yourself after some time. You always ask for references, but even if you get them, you still delete everything. If you're the person who knows everything and other people are always wrong, I feel like I'm wasting my time putting anything on Wikipedia. So I'm done. And if you're some type of the God on here, you should take a look at Los miserables page, because this poor english with tones of mistakes is really killing me everytime I read it. p.s. I don't care if you gonna get offended and I'm gonna be blocked from edits on Wikipedia for speaking my mind, but at least I feel better now. Have a nice day :) Mickie777 (talk) 02:15, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ana Brenda Contreras, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mujeres Asesinas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Avenida Brasil

Hi! I would like to ask you cordially to stop reversing the correct edit on the 'Avenida Brasil (telenovela)' article, since your edit have a few mistakes:

1. In the 'Telenovela overview' section, Bernado Simões' character 'Batata' is incorrectly written as 'Patata'. I know that when the telenovela is dubbed some names may be changed BUT we need to stick with the ORIGINAL names in the article (in this case, Batata).

You can confirm here: https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avenida_Brasil_(telenovela) or in the telenovela's official website on globo.com

2. In the 'International release' section you removed at least SEVEN countries where the telenovela was officially launched like: Israel, Hungary, Georgia, Mongolia, Bulgaria, Thaiti and Bosnia (also the territories of Saint-Pierre and Miquelon, Guadeloupe and Martinique). Plus, they are not listed in order of premiere like EVERY OTHER telenovela article in the wikipedia universe. The Russia broadcast date is also wrong (It didn't premiere on March 26, 2012. That was the original brazilian premiere date).

It's nothing personal, we just can't remove or hide correct information from the article. Hope you understand. Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Afr12run (talkcontribs) 16:09, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

International release

Listen, I'm trying to be nice with you! I don't wanna make an 'edit war' of this, but you need to understand that you can't change somenthing that is right on the article. This section in your edit have wrong information and hide countries and this cannot be accepted. Otherwise, we gonna have problems. I'm asking you to understand. Hope we can agree on something. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Afr12run (talkcontribs) 16:26, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why you keep putting Venezuela in second place on the table when Portugal was the second country to premiere? Your are not putting the countries in the correct order by premiere! They are all out of order! I'm not gonna give up! Im not gonna let you mess up with this article! I put references to a lot of countries and you still remove them (like Mauritius and Bulgaria)! What's wrong with you?

Disambiguation link notification for January 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

Avenida Brasil (telenovela), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Extra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Avenida Brasil (telenovela) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts
on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 20:00, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

page protection.  [stwalkerster|talk] 20:11, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply
]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bradford (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I ask my release, because it's my first block and took months in editing is wikipedia, the truth promise not continue creating edit wars. good morning is that eventually, all thanks for reading my request.

How can I help? 01:19, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why does your signature contain links to two other accounts? "Pichu" links to User:Bradford and "How can I help" links to User talk:DjMalik. Please change it so it links to you and not other users or your former names. only (talk) 03:20, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm

Marido en Alquiler may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page
.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * [[Anthony Lopez (actor|Anthony Lopez]] - Iván Rouge

Thanks,

talk) 11:42, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Austin Mahone

Please stop your disruptive editing. The articles have a standart. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Austin Mahone, you may be blocked from editing. stop just copying and pasting incorrect information into this article. you are removing correct formatting, reliable sources and other info. Louis Erisson (talk) 11:02, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

)
added a link pointing to TVN
Marido en Alquiler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver
)
added a link pointing to Anthony Lopez

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Episode count and edit reverts

I will say this once. Please do NOT update the episode count DURING the episode broadcast. It has to be done AFTER the episode ends. That's Wiki's policy and not mine. Also, i've noticed that you randomly revert edits that you deem unconstructive (including my edits that are not vandalism) and you reinsert what I had added on said article. Last night's edit in LQLVMR is your example. Please start following Wikipedia policy unless you really want to face the consequences, which I think it's not the best idea. Thank you.

talk) 02:11, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Disambiguation link notification for January 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

Nora, La Emprendedora, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carlos Cruz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Victoria San Marino.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fut.Perf. 08:41, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

good sources

Hello, I wonder if these sites are good references to wikipedia:

http://yaesnoticia.com/,

http://www.plusfarandula.com/,

http://www.leanoticias.com/,

www.actualidadygente.com/ ,

http://confirmado.com.ve/


Warn me please!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Submitrar (talkcontribs) 18:46, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cosita Linda article

Hello, thanks for the additions and revisions you've made to the cosita Linda article. I would like to return the episode list box and the Venezuela broadcast section, though its always being removed and the episodes are already being uploaded. Can I still return it without it having to be removed again? Thanks MarVit3 (talk) 07:15, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why Revert?

Hi,

I have included at least one reference, so the issue shouldn't be "This section does not cite any references or sources.......". Thanks. --→Enock4seth (talk) 00:39, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bradford. You have new messages at Enock4seth's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
→Enock4seth (talk) 20:53, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Santa Diabla, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Daniela Navarro

Before you reverted my edit to

WP:SUBCAT
she should not also be in its parent category.

I have restored my edit. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:04, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Televisa's telenovelas

PLEASE do not make changes to data relating to the telenovela. should not interfere as at information notified. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alka21 (talkcontribs) 18:35, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Sorry but I know you better for the information displayed on us persons responsible pages? do not think so. information will reenter the pages. for any changes need to ask. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alka21 (talkcontribs) 20:30, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Τheories vandalism to doing it yourself. access is published information on the telenovela. Much of the information on it by the producers. specifically Mr. Jose Alberto Castro producer of telenovela La Malquerida has said that the telenovela will premiere in May and Actors who will be cast in the series. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alka21 (talkcontribs) 09:39, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but after you know you better than me that I live in Mexico I read, hear and constantly learning everything for the telenovela ... once again sorry, I'm so sorry ... Alka21 (talk) 13:53, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re:

Hello GeorgeMilan there is something where I can help to you...Regards--Carliitaeliza TALK 11:26, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Madre Sustituta. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's

WP:AFD. duffbeerforme (talk) 02:03, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing
.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

chat} 02:26, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Disambiguation link notification for February 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited La Tempestad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Levy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:01, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free images on your userpage

Hi, I've edited your userpage since our rules regarding

non-free content such as the posters you've uploaded do not allow their use on userpages. Please let me know if you have any questions about this. VernoWhitney (talk) 14:01, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Unknown country?! Romania?! Really?? :) Swappyx (talk) 21:30, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Very few prizes

Would you explain the radical changes made in

this article ??? --Helptottt (talk) 22:34, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Absolutely nothing was wrong with the awards and nominations article, 50+ awards are not "few prizes." Besides, the article was reviewed and patrolled. Your redirection was unjustified, but fine, I won't report this. As for the color of the wins/nom is concerned, it's perfectly acceptable to change the colors, I don't see any problem there. Please, do not alter anything else in that section. Thank you. --Helptottt (talk) 00:41, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Santa Diabla revisions of English grammar

Hello,

There was a Wiki notice before the Santa Diabla information stating that the article needed editing for grammar, spelling, etc. I edited the translation to correct all of the English, and I clarified the debut of Diaz on Telemundo (as requested), as well as the the composition of the theme song. I did not do anything incorrectly. Please leave my revisions as they totally correct the English, and please just add the remaining information as needed. It is my pleasure to help with English translations of telenovelas. Rose1909 (talk) 22:05, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there!

Just wanted to welcome you to the WikiProject Latin music! :) Erick (talk) 19:25, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

La Otra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Shirley and Carlos González
Las Vías del Amor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver
)
added a link pointing to Ricardo Silva

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

11-11:En Mi Cuadra Nada Cuadra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cameo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Editing of telenovela template

Hi. Just wanted to request you to kindly edit the template for Venevision 2014-2015 telenovelas that you created so that it can read the current telenovelas that are airing eg corazon Esmeralda at 9 pm instead of

Cosita Linda. Thanks.MarVit3 (talk) 11:05, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

(Sky0000 (talk) 18:55, 5 March 2014 (UTC)) Why?

Why it's necessary to not show deceased characters? Justify your opinion! I post it on,when you don't justify.

Edit warring

Please do not edit war, given your previous recent block I would have expected you'd know what to do instead. I've protected

Template:Televen 2014-2015 telenovelas however if you continue edit warring at Template:Venevisión 2014-2015 telenovelas I will block you. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 04:22, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Disambiguation link notification for March 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

Secretos del Paraíso, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages RCN and Iván López (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lo Que La Vida Me Robó

Accidentally rv'd you, have rv'd myself back to your edit. Apologies! --S.G.(GH) ping! 20:06, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

La Ronca de Oro, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rating and Buga (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts!!!!

Hi,

Per your edit summary here, why not discuss this on the talk page first before reverting, excuse me to say for fun? OR a limited time provided for references to be provided. I strongly recommend talk page discussions before reverting or removing stuffs articles. Regards. →Enock4seth (talk) 02:03, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Fill out the cast

Hello! I study about telenovelas. From pages where you are the the owner, there's so little information about cast and plot! In the old days you got all information about cast,! But now only actors and their roles! Give wikipedia's user more information! Look at page En nombre del amor there's perfect cast and when someone corrects you you just remove adds.Please fill out cast section in Santa diabla start from it and don't remove other's job

Can i ask you a question ?

Title of foreign-language works

I saw you move some articles about Spanish-language albums and songs to its native capitalization. However, WP:NCCAPS says to use capitalization found on English-language sources. I once did the same thing and got into trouble for it. Just giving you a heads up. Erick (talk) 23:50, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See that's what happened. Someone told me about RAE and the enforcement of lower-case Spanish capitalization. This is where I got in trouble (I still feel bad about it). If you wish move to foreign-language titles based on its native capitalization, you should seek consensus first on the capitalization guideline talk page. It's been debated several times before and I don't want to get involved. The only exception are classical musical pieces though, where they have to follow the native capitalization rules. Erick (talk) 00:07, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I understand that other wikis respect the rules, but you still need consensus to move articles based on foreign-language. I'm going to revert the moves back, but if you want to change it, request the moves here. Erick (talk) 00:17, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Show me a policy or guideline in Wikipedia that says I have to follow the Spanish language rules for titles of works. I showed you the above link because that was done by a guidelines. And yes you do have to reach consensus. Wikipedia is a community-based project. If you disagree, start a discussion here. Erick (talk) 01:18, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on

section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify
their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

talk) 00:12, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Hello, I saw your page while

talk) 00:19, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

RE: Hi

Asi-asi. Erick (talk) 20:22, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to
Canal de las Estrellas

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from

Canal de las Estrellas
without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! TheQ Editor (Talk) 19:43, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

La Malquerida (telenovela)

The article

La Malquerida (telenovela) has been proposed for deletion
because of the following concern:

Too soon
for this to be noteable as it hasnt yet occured as per users other posts on Telenovelas.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your

the article's talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Amortias (T)(C) 23:19, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GeorgeMilan, per your admission here, I have indefinitely blocked your alternate account because it is being used to edit the same material in violation of

policy. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 16:02, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

70.190.12.130

Accusing me of sockpuppetry? Go ahead and report me for that, but you will have wasted your time because I only use MY account (this one you see here) for editing wikipedia. Unlike you, I don't have another identity here, so please keep your hypocritical opinions to yourself.

talk) 16:36, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

I don't need anyone to defend me because I can stand up for myself. I do not knpw who is that editor and I don't care because it's none of my business. Again, feel free to report me and that IP address, but don't come crying to me if you get blocked for accusing me for sockpuppetry.
talk) 16:46, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Quick Question/ pregunta

hello there i just wanted to know if you deleted the mexican Broadcast of the telenovela lo que la vida me robo? Hola que tal solo queria saber si tu borraste el transmitir Mexicano de la telenovela Lo Que La Vida Me Robo?

Hello, I've actually removed that section as irrelevant and not have references. see
TALK2ME 01:48, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

All that has to be done to get it back is to add the site where the ratings come from to references Joeloliv8 (talk) 21:39, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

your edits

Did you delete the mexico broadcast section from the article lo que la vida ne robo..it was indeed relevant to everyone who looked at the list of episodes to stay up to date on the series i dont think it was the right thing to do i hope you can recover it because it was very helpful

Orphaned non-free image File:El Señor de los Cielos poster 1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the

Stefan2 (talk) 14:51, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Yo no creo en los hombres

I've wikilinked that with the corresponding Spanish and Portugese articles, but I have to ask why you've moved it from the original title, which seemed fine, to the current title which seems grammatically suspect? Valenciano (talk) 20:57, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vida robada (1991 telenovela)

This is an automated message from

Vida robada (1991 telenovela), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.alma-latina.net/VidaRobadaII/VidaRobadaII.shtml
.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not

talk) 03:55, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Muchacha Italiana Viene a Casarse (2014 telenovela)

I'm not sure I understand exactly what you're asking but you requested the article be deleted be it was clearly written by the inventor/maker of the show and it showed no significance. I don't see any evidence of the former and a TV show that airs on TV with blue-linked actors is probably a bit of significance. If you think the article should be deleted, consider

WP:AFD. WilyD 09:53, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Mi corazón es tuyo

Per

talk · contribs) 14:40, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

New episode lists.

Hello,

Damián80. I've redirected some of your new episode lists back to their main pages: List of Young & Hungry episodes, List of Chasing Life episodes, and List of Mi corazón es tuyo episodes. I've left a message on each of the main talk pages to explain why, but please see the ""Wikipedia:Splitting#Size split Rule of thumb" section for when to split a page. Thank you. — Wyliepedia 12:52, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Restored the telenovela page. Good luck maintaining it. — Wyliepedia 19:22, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What are you doing?

Why did you delete the list of episodes for De que te quiero, te quiero they were very well needed especially by me, now i dont know which episode i am and you just dete it. Also about the cast, what's wrong with the cast I put. First of all it's better than yours because yours is messy, missing stuff, and out of order, mines is clear, tidy, and had all the information available. It's not fair that any edits on that page are a erased by you. You dont own the page sooooo why are you doing it?

Why

Leave the cast i did and also the list of episodes i restored. They are relevant.

You look like you are in a bit of an edit war. You need to take it to the talk page and invite the other editor. Yes, he has been a bit of a jerk, but you've been here a while and he hasn't. At least make an effort to get him to discuss on the article talk page, and come to an understanding or compromise. Part of the problem is that your edit summaries have been non-existent or less than helpful, and maybe some discussion and summaries might help. To be clear, I've warned him clearly and loudly on his talk page, I'm just asking you help out a bit to give him a chance to turn around. Dennis Brown |  | WER 21:32, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oh, and he brought you up at
    WP:ANI, but participation isn't required and in fact, probably not a good idea. Dennis Brown |  | WER 21:34, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Danna Garcia

The name of novela is La revancha, not Vuelve junto ami. That is a name of a theme song. Check first before you post false names.

Wikilinking

Hi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia.

I noticed an article you worked on. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:

  • dates
  • years
  • commonly known geographical terms (including well-known country-names), and
  • common terms you’d look up in a dictionary (unless significantly technical).

This applies to infoboxes, too.

Thanks, and my best wishes.

Tony (talk) 09:21, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Synopsis of Mi corazón es tuyo

The synopsis is meant to be a short, general overview of the basic plot in a few sentences. It is not necessary to include every single detail, because the show's full summary contains many spoilers. I know that the summary you included in from the show's official site, but this version is poorly translated and not in grammatically correct English. I included a 2 to 3 sentence translated version of the telenovela's plot based on articles written about the show. Thanks for helping out. Musicfan877 (talk) 02:56, 22 July 2014 (UTC)Musicfan877Musicfan877 (talk) 02:56, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, let's compromise. I edited your translation, but took out most of the spoilers because there were too many and none of it made much sense. I understand that some telenovela articles have longer plot summaries, but I think a paragraph gives plenty of information. The complete summary is too long and readers only need basic information about the story. The longer summaries have too much important information. I am just paraphrasing, so the information is easier and clearer. Thanks. Musicfan877 (talk) 04:53, 22 July 2014 (UTC)Musicfan877[reply]
Hello, Please explain what you want. I translated what you had, but in less words. The information you had is not written correctly, which is why I kept changing it. None of what you have in this section is in correct English. Your translation of the summary has a lot of errors with verbs and subjects. I think we can both agree that the article should be written in correct English. If you want to use this long summary, maybe you can update the Spanish page with it. Musicfan877 (talk) 06:03, 22 July 2014 (UTC)Musicfan877[reply]


Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Talk:Mi corazón es tuyo". The discussion is about the article Mi corazón es tuyo. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! a DRN volunteer. --Bejnar (talk) 05:58, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

Template:Televisa telenovelas 1960s

Template:Televisa telenovelas 1960s has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. NSH002 (talk) 17:56, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply
]


A page you started (El juicio de los padres) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating El juicio de los padres, Damián80!

Wikipedia editor Kavdiamanju just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for creating a new page, it will be really much appreciated if you can add more information to add encyclopedic value to the current page.

To reply, leave a comment on Kavdiamanju's talk page.

Learn more about

page curation
.

A page you started (Mi amor frente al pasado) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Mi amor frente al pasado, Damián80!

Wikipedia editor Kavdiamanju just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for creating a new page, it will be really much appreciated if you can add more information to add encyclopedic value to the current page.

To reply, leave a comment on Kavdiamanju's talk page.

Learn more about

page curation
.

A page you started (Pensión de mujeres (telenovela)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating

Pensión de mujeres (telenovela)
, Damián80!

Wikipedia editor I dream of horses just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I've added the article to Wikiproject Television.

To reply, leave a comment on I dream of horses's talk page.

Learn more about

page curation
.

Jaime Camil page, deleted TV shows

Hi Damián. I periodically check Jaime Camil's English page to keep it updated and fix any vandalism, etc. I see that you changed the format of his filmography and that makes sense. But you deleted more than half of his television shows because they do not fit the category, "Telenovelas." Could you please restore them? He has done TV work inside and outside of the category Telenovelas (and a few shows such as Devious Maids and Jane the Virgin which are pseudo-telenovelas), so I would think it appropriate to change the category from Telenovelas back to Television, but you may wish to format it differently.

Thank you for restoring his picture to the page. I'm glad it's back. In my opinion it's an awful photo, but that's not your fault - it was there years before you ever edited the page. What is the process for replacing it with a better picture? Must the change come from Jaime Camil's office? I know nothing about the technical side of Wikipedia edits.

FYI I am a native English speaker and I use telenovelas to improve my Spanish. Paulah88 (talk) 01:48, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Telenovelas

You're doing a great job with the telenovelas, very welcome. Don't be put off by a nav template nom for deletion. All you have to do is hide the red links until you can get to them, no rush, it'll take time to start them all properly.See

Template:Televisa telenovelas 1960s View here, I've hidden the fully red linked years for the time being, all you have to do is move the dotted line markers I've added. I've left the remainder of 1969 as it seems you're working through that year.♦ Dr. Blofeld 06:08, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Another thing, can you please add the year and the correct imdb links [1]?♦ Dr. Blofeld 06:22, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

De nada. Estoy aprendiendo a hablar español con fluidez. Puedo tratar de hablar en español, me perdone si me equivoco! Si usted necesita ayuda con la plantilla al enlace rojo más, voy a editarlo.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:52, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK. No me importa tratar de comunicarse en español, ya que es una buena práctica! Hazme saber cuando se inicia un año más.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:02, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jaime Camil, references

Damián, si no le molesta, prefiero inglés porque su inglés es mucho mejor que mi español. I found the following references. All of these are television shows, but none are telenovelas. Also you listed "Una familia de diez" as a telenovela, but it is an episode-based comedy instead. Maybe you want to add Jaime Camil's new show to the list - it's a US show in English. Jane the Virgin. Network: CW. Start date: October 2014. Role: Rogelio. Site: http://www.cwtv.com/shows/jane-the-virgin/about (scroll down to see him in the credits).


Devious Maids. Season 1. Episode 5: Taking out the trash. Full cast: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2599184/fullcredits?ref_=tt_ov_st_sm


El Gran Show con Jaime Camil https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_gran_show_(Univision) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4IxvMU6F48


El Gran Mexicano http://www.eluniversal.com.mx/espectaculos/101081.html Note, the newspaper El Universal-Mexico is a respected, serious newspaper, not gossip site. See its Wikipedia page, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_Universal_(Mexico_City)


Aventura Por Mexico http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1393858/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1


La Familia P. Luche. Season 1 (2002-2004), episode 14, El Concurso de Reclamos. https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anexo:Episodios_de_La_familia_P._Luche


Operación triunfo (México) http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0328785/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1 https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operación_triunfo_(México)


Diseñador de ambos sexos http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0274252/fullcredits?ref_=tt_ov_st_sm (click "see full cast") https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diseñador_de_ambos_sexos 7 episodes: Season 1 episodes 16, 17, 21, 22, 23, 24, Season 2 episode 29.


Qué nochecita con Jaime Camil http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1176923/


El Show de Jaime Camil http://www.peopleenespanol.com/famoso/jaime-camil http://www.esmas.com/espectaculos/artistas/363033.html http://novelas.about.com/od/telenovelas-celebridades/fl/Jaime-Camil-un-galaacuten-muy-divertido.htm

Paulah88 (talk) 08:42, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I prefer to wait for you to do it. I already posted the information long ago. Si el que removió infomación legitimo es usted, a quién se toca, recolocarlo?

Paulah88 (talk) 23:32, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How it's not necessary information?

You don't decide what's necessary and what's not. Me neither but I wanna see rules, which says that that information is forbidden .I hope you let me change Wikipedia better. Zaca4 (talk)

Corazón indomable

I can't understand why do you remove the information about "Corazon Indomable in Bulgaria"? There are all sources you need. Please explain to me, what is wrong? --46.229.193.141 (talk) 16:18, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, have any other source a little clearer, I had no reference exists.--
(talk) 16:23, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
There was a reference - the official site of the television. Look again the history and you will see it.--46.229.193.141 (talk) 22:12, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can we make a deal?

I don't understand why you helped me but thank you. I don't know, what administrators will decide, but I want to make a deal with you. If you let me do cast and deceased characters in novela pages(and other people too, who really may help to upgrade) and I won't bother you in other sections. Do you agree? I wait for your answer. Zaca4 (talk) 18:22, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, but you at least do something

Can you at least let me refer in articles, I don't war with you again but if you don't agree, maybe I must continue. I hope you agree. Zaca4 (talk)

You won

I won't touch telenovelas again, because I do not need more problems. I know you harm Wikipedia a lot, but fortunately , we have more places where to get information.Also I hope that administrators make right decision. Best wishes. Zaca4 (talk) 10:12, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Deborah (telenovela)

Hello Damián80,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged

Deborah (telenovela)
for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on

talk) 10:02, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Speedy deletion nomination of Detrás del muro

Hello Damián80,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Detrás del muro for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on

talk) 10:24, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply
]


An award for you!

Mexican Television Award of National Merit
Keep up the terrific work with the telenovelas and template creation. Very productive!! (Sigan con el excelente trabajo con las telenovelas y la creación de plantillas. Muy productiva!) ♦ Dr. Blofeld 06:17, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Removed references, Jaime Camil page

English translation follows each paragraph. Tema: la pagina de ingles de Jaime Camil Subject: the English page for Jaime Camil

Primero, sacaste los shows de filmography que tú encontraste en la pagina imbd de Jaime Camil. (Buscaste paginas imbd de cada uno show? No.) Sacaste infomacion, por falta de reference, sin ni una gota de esfuerza para asegurarte si sería apropiada. (English: First, you removed the shows from the filmography, if you could not find them in Jaime Camil's imbd page. Did you look for any of the shows themselves in imbd? No. You removed information, supposedly for lack of reference, without lifting a finger to make sure the removal was appropriate.)

Luego, despues que yo te dado la informacion que me pediste, tú me dijiste que no tengas tiempo para recolocar las cosas que sacaste. Dijiste que yo debo recolocar los que sacaste tú. (Quiere decir, yo debo corregir lo que destrozas tú.) (English: Then, after I gave you the information you requested, you told me you were too busy to put back the information you removed. You told me that I should do it (in other words I should fix what you destroyed).)

Entonces, despues de 2 días, para evitar conflictos, yo recoloqué los shows, hasta la forma que pusiste. CON todos los referencias y enlaces. Admito, algunos enlaces fueran en forma equivocada; acabo de pedir ayuda de corregirlos, de otro wikipedia editor. (English: So, after two days, to avoid conflict, I put back the shows, and I even put them in the format you created. WITH all the references and links. I admit that some links were in the wrong format. Right away I requested help to fix them from another Wikipedia editor.)

Y que? Aunque no tienes tiempo para reponer lo que sacaste indebidamente, SI! tienes tiempo (en pocas horas!) para destruir el trabajo de otros! Tus combios inapropiados: (English: And what happened? Even though you had no time to fix what you removed inappropriately, AMAZINGLY you had time to destroy the work of others - in just a few hours! Your inappropriate changes:)

1. Qué nochecita con Jaime Camil. You removed the reference. Now there is no link and no reference for the show. There is no Wikipedia page.

2. Diseñador de ambos sexos. You removed the link to the Spanish wiki page. Now there is no link and no reference for the show. I know mine was a red link; I was researching how to link to a Spanish Wikipedia page.

3. Operación Triunfo. You removed the link to the Spanish wiki page. Now there is no link and no reference for the show.

4. La familia P. Luche. You removed the link to "Season 1, Episode 14." Note that the link that you kept in, to the show itself, does not list Jaime Camil. For that, you need the link I put in the notes column. Since you remove shows if they do not have sufficient reference, why would you remove the only reference to Jaime Camil being in the show?

5. Aventura por Mexico. You removed the reference. Now there is no link and no reference for the show. There is no Wikipedia page.

6. El Gran Show. You left in the Wikipedia link, but it points to a show from Peru. You removed the reference to the Univision show, which is the show Jaime Camil was in.

7. Devious Maids. You left in the Wikipedia link, which points to a page that does not list Jaime Camil. You removed the reference to the imbd full cast list, which includes Jaime Camil.

Por favor, hacer las correciones a tus errores, o revolver la pagina a la forma anterior. Si puedes corregir mis enlaces a paginas de wikipedia-español, te agradezco. (English: Please correct the errors you put on the page, or return the page to its former version. If you can correct my links to the Spanish wikipedia pages, I would appreciate it.) Paulah88 (talk) 23:21, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

page protection.  - 2/0 (cont.) 12:29, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply
]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bradford (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I understand that my mistake was falling in wars. But take some time editing wikipedia, after two days is blocking me, when the edit war had stopped. I promise not to fall back into edit wars, it was my fault not taken into account.

(talk) 14:48, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bradford (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

It seems unfair that my block me 48 hours and the other user around 24 hours, it is clear that he did nothing wrong, right?. Besides, I just created another account to impose its puppet editions. Here you can see these links: [2], [3], [4], Your new account is Dedo34, this seems totally unfair, since the wars of issues with this user comes from multiple items from telenovelas. And just to help you be a more encyclopedic wikipedia I make this place. But okay I get it here to help anyone cares and clear the other user does what you want when you want! and no one can say anything. Zaca4 user has multiple accounts using puppets to impose their issues and of course no one does anything right?. I understand that I must not fall into edit wars that user but so did block it alone for a day and me for two days, that does not seem right.--

(talk) 13:26, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Decline reason:

You're no longer blocked. PhilKnight (talk) 06:46, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Zaca4 got 24 hours and you got 48 hrs because it was a first offense for Zaca4 and a second for you. After the first one you should have known better than to edit war. Also, did you admit to having created a Dedo34 as sock puppet account? If so, that account is going to be blocked and you may end up with a 1 week block for socking. Blackmane (talk) 14:58, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is serious?, The Dedo34 account is a puppet Zaca4, seriously going to tell me that I believe account?. This account is not mine, and also Zaca4 was blocked before. I leave this link here [5]. Also, my first lock was months ago, and the user has been blocked Zaca4 twice already and he only block it for a day, this seems unfair.--
(talk) 15:26, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: To see that I'm not lying, It is not the first time aa Zaca4 block because it is a puppet of Sky0000.--
(talk) 18:47, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

File:Mi corazón es tuyo cast.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered,

Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 17:53, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Question is in that you cooperate with me or no

Question is same: you let me do cast and I won't bother you or no. You said no. I do not want edit-war with you but you do not let me do anything. And now you wonder, why I am still here. If you do not like what I am doing here, then do not start a war. I do not want to pay more consequences and please if you said no for peace and cooperating with me then no. You can always say yes. No wars any more. I hope you understand that what I am doing in Wikipedia is better for everyone. Zeta54 (talk) 11:17, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of De pocas, pocas pulgas, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.seriesnow.com/mexican-telenovelas/depocaspocaspulgas.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not

talk) 22:37, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

August 2014

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Telemetro shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. — MusikAnimal talk 04:35, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actor links

Per

WP:REDNOT in the edit summary,[6] so I do not understand why you restored the redlinks. Please note that the cast section should include character descriptions, not just names, which is why I tagged the section for such cleanup.[7] I have re-tagged the section as it is still excessively long. Please do not remove thetemplate until the identified problems are resolved. --AussieLegend () 04:13, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Template:Infobox television

Star Trek: The Animated Series
Related
Star Trek: The Original Series
Star Trek: The Next Generation

If you have read them as I suggested,[8] based on this change you appear to misunderstand the instructions for {{Infobox television}}. The parameters |preceded_by= and |followed_by= are NOT for the series that aired immediately before and after a series on a particular night, they are for series for which the subject series is the successor or predecessor. For example, Star Trek: The Original Series aired from 1966-69. It was the predecessor to Star Trek: The Animated Series, which aired from 1973-74. Those series were succeeded by Star Trek: The Next Generation, which aired from 1987-94. The infobox for Star Trek: The Animated Series would look as it does to the right If these series were to air on a Monday night in the order:

  • Star Trek: The Next Generation 8-9pm
  • Star Trek: The Animated Series 9-10pm
  • Star Trek: The Original Series 10-11pm

the infobox would still look as it does to the right. Similarly, |related= is for series that are "remakes, spin-offs, adaptations for different audiences, etc." Simply replacing a series does not make that series "related". Please also note that, as I indicated in this edit summary, "px" is not required. I do not understand why you restored it in this edit. --AussieLegend () 17:52, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

La sombra del Pasado

I try to create the page, I only do this. Alk@ 19:42, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Protection

Please help. Likewise kick (2014) film there is vandalism happening on the article Anjaan movie. Its done by an IP who seems to be a socket pup. Need protection for this page. Kindly help. Redards.


August 2014

cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history
, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is

© Tbhotch (en-2.5). 21:25, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply
]


Cuando los hijos se van (telenovela)

This is an automated message from

.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not

talk) 17:39, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

You've made more edits to Marido en alquiler that have restored problems that have previously been discussed. These include, but are not limited to:

  • restoration of "px" in the infobox.[9] - As Ihave explained previously,[10][11] px is not required. The instructions for {{Infobox television}} specifically say that "px" should be excluded.
  • restoration of cast tables - As we have discussed, cast should be listed per
    MOS:TV and should be in prose form, rather than tables. MOS:TV actually suggests the "ACTOR as CHARACTER" format. Since the section in the article is titled "Main characters", I used "CHARACTER portrayed by ACTOR" when fixing all the poor English used in the section. "CHARACTER portrayed by ACTOR" fits much better when character descriptions are included. There is simply no reason to use tables in this section; it is not a conventional format in TV series articles. Could you please explain why you keep ignoring advice instead of collaborating on the article as we are required to do? I note you have also edited the recurring characters section. That's great but please note that people are not referred to as "it", as you did in this edit. Individual actors should be referred to as "he" or "she". --AussieLegend () 11:27, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply
    ]
You know what ?. you got me tired, I'm doing what you gives laziness to do, because it's so easy to place a template for others to do the work for you, articles from soap operas have always edited that way, you get your out of nowhere saying and you demand that a soap opera, is a TV series. It is good that you know a lot. Yours ignorance is very good. I'm editing the way it has always done, and you get from nothing to enforce rules; believing that "
(talk) 16:17, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
There is an old English saying, "Two wrongs don't make a right". Here we have a specific essay that elaborates on that. It's called
MOS:TV, the MOS in general and our policies and guidelines. The edits you are making do not comply with our requirements and if you persist, especially in edit-warring as you have been doing, you may find yourself unable to edit. --AussieLegend () 17:44, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

August 2014

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Marido en alquiler. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. AussieLegend () 17:38, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

page protection.  Bbb23 (talk) 23:24, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bradford (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I only did 2 reversal of any other single I reversed myself. Also since the problem had been solved, and leave everything as they wanted. So why the blockade, but it seems unfair one week block, and do not tell me it's because I have blocked 2 times above, clear is the way to undo a user, and of course at least make the attempt to order the release , but equally I will deny it. Yes I know it was my fault; but there is leave things as they wanted.

(talk) 02:10, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ok, at least if I will not unlock, I can reduce blocking to two days, or a day, please. I know I made a mistake, but these new changes in the articles of soap operas are a little difficult to accept, because it always is edited differently. Without adding descriptions to the characters.--
(talk) 04:24, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
Well, of course if I block my right ?. And others do what they want and nobody says anything ?, right ?. Like this: [12].A nd of course true; only pay me. But it's okay, I do not bother them more for a week, I hope you can be happy and content.--
(talk) 17:08, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
This is not about what other users do. However, please note that I have warned ElNiñoMonstruo about edit warring and pointed out that he has breached 3RR on that article. --AussieLegend () 17:27, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Obviously you do not know this person; also generated in the past edit wars. And of course never have locked on these grounds; but clearly not?, pay out of the first you see, and want others to do it ?. And I have several tests of several acts of vandalism ElNiñoMonstruo, and evidence that is always in edit wars. But no matter, I can wait for my lock. Anyway this is what you wanted.--
(talk) 18:15, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
Again, this is not about what other editors do. --AussieLegend () 18:41, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bradford (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi, I'm asking you to reduce blocking me until Monday, that is a tall order; is all I'm asking. I know I made a mistake, but it can be done. I have already done is done, and you can not change. But as it is evident that I say no, at least make the attempt. I am sorry please.

(talk) 21:55, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(talk) 23:12, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply
]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
administrator, who accepted the request.

Bradford (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Well it is my last request will not know how many times you can order the release; because this is a little different to other wikipedia. But if I understand it is to fall edit wars, I know that before I talk to the user that I have conflicts to reach a consensus, or ask for help from a manager wikipedia, I know that violates one of the important rules of wikipedia and is

(talk) 07:16, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Accept reason:

@

(talk) 03:21, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Elimination of information

(English translation follows)

Damián, En los dos días antes que lo bloquearon, usted quitó más que 1,000 letras de trabajo de otros, 16 veces distintos. 16 veces in solo dos días, caray! Y siete veces más, quitó más que 500 letras. (Y su historia de antes está igual.) No le parece, que algo pasa mal? Sí señor, contribuye mucho a Wikipedia. Pero tambien, usted roba mucho. Tal vez todo el mundo está contra de usted, pero puede ser que está usted contra todo el mundo? Ya tiene 19 años. Que comportese como adulto, no como niño de berrinches. Si quiere evitar los bloqueos, aprenda como trabajar CON otros. Quita de trabajar CONTRA otros.

English translation:

Damián, in the two days before you were blocked, you removed more than 1,000 characters from the work of others, 16 different times. 16 times in only two days, for goodness sake! And seven more times you removed more than 500 characters. (Your prior history is the same.) There's something wrong here, don't you think? Yes you do contribute much to Wikipedia. But you also remove/rob much. Maybe the whole world IS against you. But could it be that you are against the whole world? You're already 19 years old. Behave like an adult, not like a child throwing tantrums. If you want to avoid being blocked, learn how to work WITH others instead of working AGAINST others.

Paulah88 (talk) 19:28, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Paulah88:, First I do not know who you mean, second who told you that I am 19 years ?; I recommend that you not jump to conclusions, without proof or something to prove it. Now if you mean the article Jaime Camil, I have not taken anything away, so I left you placed. Now if you mean; to this edition. Well that issue is correct, you can not use IMDb and Wikipedia references in Spanish, that goes external links, now if you can not understand that, I can not do anything for you.
Spanish

Primero no sé a que te refieres, segundo quien te ha dicho que tengo 19 años?; te recomiendo que no saques conclusiones, sin tener pruebas o algo que lo demuestre. Ahora si te refieres al artículo de Jaime Camil, no he quitado nada, he dejado lo que usted colocó. Ahora si te refieres; a está edición. Pues esa edición es correcta, no puedes usar

(talk) 20:17, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

English translation follows.

Perdón. Tu propio user page dice que naciste en junio de 1996, entonces acabas de alcanzar a 18 años. En lo segundo, no hablo sobre mi trabajo, sino sobre otras paginas. Las paginas en que tú quitaste el trabajo de tantos otros. Ellos te resistan, y tú echas la culpa a ellos por ser bloqueado. La culpa pertenece a todos otros, y no a ti? Mira a tu propia "contributions" pagina. No veas cuantas veces quitaste partes grandes de otros? Quita de pelear contra los administators - los que te bloquean. Escucha a sus correciones, aceptalo, y aprender ser buen editor si mismo.
Aug 14, 16:19. A vida da gente. -3,948 letras
Aug 14, 00:35. Quererte así. -1,059 letras.
Aug 14, 00:01, Libre para amarte. -10,061 letras.
Aug 13, 23:56, La impostora. -1,531 letras.
Aug 12, 23:21, Los rey. -15,955 letras.
Aug 12, 22:51. Vivir a destiempo. -20,955 letras.
Aug 12, 18:52. La que no podía amar. -3,875 letras.
Aug 12, 14:00. Lo que la vida me robó. -7,223 letras.
Aug 12, 01:07. Santa diabla. -3,672 letras.
y mucho más.

English translation:

Pardon me. Your user page says you were born in June 1996, so you just turned 18. Secondly, I'm not talking about my work, but other pages. The pages where you removed the work of so many others. They resist your changes, and you blame them for being blocked. Is the blame entirely upon others, and not on you? Look at your contributions page. Don't you see how many times you removed huge parts of others' work? (list) Stop fighting with the adminsitrators - those who blocked you. Listen to their corrections, accept it, and learn to be a good editor yourself.

Paulah88 (talk) 21:28, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@
(talk) 21:45, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Damian, I included the Spanish so you would understand me clearly. But this is not our private conversation; it is part of wikipedia's English public discussion. Please put what you wrote into English so the public discussion is available to everyone. In our culture, that is the polite thing to do. If you do not have time to translate, please be polite by removing your untranslated comments. Paulah88 (talk) 01:21, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Paulah88:, Well first, it's my talk page; and I think as you asked me to explain, but anyway:
I think if you had been more specific, I would have understood, now preferred to speak in Spanish, if you please, what happens in these articles, it's not that I like doing simply are no rules, and I deleted those items, breach wikipedia policies, if you want a deal-breaker you look this history, you know for accounts that are not mine inventions. As it says here in the Manueal style wikipedia, clearly states that no "are a program guide ", then all you have removed is clearly basing on that page are standards; the long list of episodes per day, I've also removed; that information imcumple policy consideration of What Wikipedia is not, is referrals and information without unnecessary and a long list of titles and now. Many users like ElNiñoMonstruo not want to understand that, ElNiñoMonstruo just think I'm against it, and there's only plot and even; here can see another user as explained to him, and he acts as if we were all against him, and I think business wikipedia. For policies wikipedia are very clear and this type of information are not acceptable, but if you disagree, you can go to the links I gave you and in the same discussion of each, to make a case for why you are editions should be accepted. They are not my things, are the policies and rules of wikipedia. Sorry I do not write in English, but is a bit difficult to translate long texts.
There I've left this translated, I hope you can understand.--
(talk) 01:52, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
Thank you for translating. Tan amable (very kind of you). Paulah88 (talk) 03:49, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why you undo my edits?

I won't undo more if you explain why in El Señor de los Cielos this edit is unnecessary. Syar756 (talk) 06:02, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@
(talk) 08:08, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Precise to your message about

1989 (Taylor Swift album). I also explained to them that ther edit was plain disruptive (i.e. the numerous vandalism on that page), and could warrant administrator attention and a block. Would you mind try asking the user again to set this straight? IPadPerson (talk) 21:26, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Undo again.

So you're reverting all my edits again? Could it be that you really hate me so much and you hate all my edits? Grow up you Mr. Corrupt!! -ElNiñoMonstruo (talk) 05:13, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalisation of US-created television series

Hi Damián80 - please stop moving television series to lower-cased titles. US-created series - irrespective of the language in which they are made - are usually named with full capitals. Grutness...wha? 13:12, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also, do not simply copy and paste entire pages, as you did when you moved Dame Chocolate to Dame hocolate. This breaks the page history. Grutness...wha? 13:18, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

La impostora

You seem to be involved in a slow edit war. Please use Talk:La impostora. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 08:19, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There was nothing on the Ips talk page or the article talk page. Also it is a content dispute so it gets protected in the version it was at. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 08:36, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
OK. I only looked at 46.229.194.33 (talk · contribs). it means they are changing and may not see any comments You should make a comment at Talk:La impostora and see if the IP (one of them) replies. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 08:59, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

REC 3: Genesis

Hi, I just wanted to let you know (and would have done so sooner had I noticed your edits) that I undid your move of the page in question. Per

Guy 20:23, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

We can note that in the article, in fact we probably should if we haven't already.
Guy 00:10, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
In that case we should probably upload the English version of the poster to this wiki.
Guy 00:19, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply
]


Hello!

Could you explain, why you undo my edit in

El color de la pasión
? I will not undo more, if you give me a good explanation.
Xaxi32 (talk) 13:23, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Yo no creo en los hombres logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the

Stefan2 (talk) 11:07, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Your attention needed at WP:CHU

Hello. A bureaucrat or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 14:10, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've already done.--
talk) 14:13, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Los miserables (1974 telenovela)

This is an automated message from

.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not

talk) 21:43, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Les Misérables (Mexican telenovela)

A tag has been placed on

section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.alma-latina.net/MiserablesLos/MiserablesLos.shtml. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing
.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BMIComp 22:23, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

A page you started (Secretaria o mujer) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Secretaria o mujer, Damián80!

Wikipedia editor Fevrret just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Already a stub.

To reply, leave a comment on Fevrret's talk page.

Learn more about

page curation
.

Complaint about you at
WP:AN3

Please see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User: Damián80 reported by User:SineBot (Result: ). There appears to be some kind of a long-term war about proper style for TV-related articles. You can respond to the report if you wish. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:45, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

If you will accept my offer then, I won't bother you any more. That's so easy. Don't think that I will just leave you alone. You must do something alwaysDews34 (talk)

These rules are your fantasy. It is your only chance to accept the request. No then no. Then I must continue making your life more interesting. Dews34 (talk) 14:49, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


You chose it. Accept my offer and I won't bother you again. You don't leave me another chance Dews34 (talk)

File:Yo no creo en los hombres logo.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered,

Stefan2 (talk) 15:29, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Manuel Balbi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

talk) 10:44, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Sorry, but this doesn't come under A11. It's either a hoax, or needs prodding for lack of notability. A11 is for good faith articles about things like drinking games, new words, or sports that are played in the school corridor. They're at least possibly real, but are as notable as a blank CD. Hoaxes are intended to deceive (which this might be - I wouldn't know, not even knowing what a telenovela is), A11 just stuff that even the inventors will forget about come exam time. Safe treatment here is prod, or a bit of Googling for a hoax. It's not yet out, so promo comes into play too... (Sneaky, that.) Peridon (talk) 22:02, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I AM PISSED OFF!!!

HEY DISRUPTER! YOU ARE FROM VENEZUELA RIGHT? YOU DON'T KNOW EVERYTHING ABOUT THE PHILIPPINES AND YOU NEVER WATCHED ANY OF PHILIPPINE DRAMAS. I ALREADY STOPPED EDITING ON ALL OF YOUR SPANISH TELENOVELAS ARTICLES A LONG TIME AGO BY USING ALL OF YOUR "REVERTING/UNDO" POWERS. AND NOW YOU ARE BOTHERING ME AGAIN WITH THIS?!? HOW DARE YOU!!? I'M SURE YOU WILL USE YOUR SO-CALLED RULES AGAIN IN THE FUTURE, CAUSE YOU HAVE NO CONSCIENCE AND YOU ARE VERY UNHELPFUL!! PLEASE STOP CREATING ARTICLES ABOUT THE PHILIPPINES OR I WILL CALL THE POLICE!!! (And for the Admins, very sorry for the caps lock.) -ElNiñoMonstruo (talk) 14:57, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, if you're mad or not is not my problem. I have every right to edit any article. Items have no owner and if you do not like it is not my problem either. I have not done anything.--
(Talk) 15:03, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
You are just joking! You have no right to edit or create any article without knowing everything! Tell me, what is the reason why did you created this article?? To use all of your "The Power of Reverting/Undo" so you can make Wikipedia NOT FREE to everyone?? -ElNiñoMonstruo (talk) 15:24, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
All the Spanish is all yours, so please stop using the Philippines or any countries to your evil plans! You should not destroy Wikipedia! -ElNiñoMonstruo (talk) 15:27, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Here we go again with your "evil undo". The Hawak Kamay (TV series) article already has a template, and there is no need for another one. And the article is NOT YOURS so stop bothering me with your disruptive reverts again. -ElNiñoMonstruo (talk) 15:32, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Items not have owners. And I have every right to edit what you want, not because you let me say what I do. I'm not doing anything will you. And I'm really getting tired of the way you talk to me. I have put a complaint here.--
(Talk) 15:45, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
No!! Items DO have owners! You are no right! And I'm really getting tired of your reverts for a long long time! Did you know that EVERYONE CAN'T EDIT ANYMORE IN WIKIPEDIA ALL BECAUSE OF YOU? So please stop using me to your ambitious plans! -ElNiñoMonstruo (talk) 15:59, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
As you wish, I have not done anything to you. If you want to follow this plan, either.--
(Talk) 16:04, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
Just remember Mr.
DJMalik/GeorgeMilan/Chema/Damian80/McVeigh/ElSeñordelosCielos, you are NOT the president of Wikipedia. STOP REVERTING and STOP COPY! -ElNiñoMonstruo (talk) 16:16, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
I remember your username is "ElNiñoMonstruo" not "ElSeñordelosCielos". So I have every right to use that name, because it is not yours nor yours. You rid my edits without giving any reason, I threaten to call the police, tell me you think I own wikipedia. And you're pissed.--
talk) 12:00, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
You are a manipulative Copy-Paster. You are the one McVeigh who is using the username "ElSeñordelosCielos", and not me. So give up now! You lost! -ElNiñoMonstruo (talk) 14:22, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Go ahead and feel free to report me Mr.
DJMalik/GeorgeMilan/Jorge Horan/Chema/Damian80/McVeigh/ElSeñordelosCielos, but don't come crying to me if you get blocked again. -ElNiñoMonstruo (talk) 15:24, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

3RR

I strongly suggest that you also be careful - your actions at

talk) 18:08, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Broadcast table

Hi, I want to know that you removed the broadcast table on

Violetta (telenovela), which it appears last time it was removed. So, I re-added it back but why you remove it again? --Allen (talk to me! / ctrb / E-mail me) 21:39, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

@
(talk) 21:48, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Hello. This template article suspect user of {{ABS-CBN telenovelas}} that edited by Eric abiog. Please revert this vandalism contributions here. Thanks. Lara Maigue (talk) 05:24, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sheryl Rubio requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Aerospeed (Talk) 22:13, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Luis Coronel Vandalism

McVeigh,
I see that you are constantly reverting several edits from
Luis Coronel which appears to be over-time vandalism coming from different IP-addresses I recommend that you request the article to be semi-protected. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank You, GavinoComments & ComplaintsContributions 22:25, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@
talk 06:14, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Halloween cheer!


@
talk) 23:15, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
You're welcome and thanks :) -Davey2010(talk) 23:17, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You harass me again, you are very unhelpful. -_-

Hey, yu stap sending messejes to me, yu ar bulliying me agen. AY EM NAT YUR PREND END AY DU NAT WANT TU BI ASOSIYEYTED WIT YU END AY DONT NID YUR HELP. Du yu si it mister evil? ay wil sey it agen. AY EM NAT YUR PREND END AY DU NAT WANT TU BI ASOSIYEYTED WIT YU END AY DONT NID YUR HELP. Lets sey it agen! AY EM NAT YUR PREND END AY DU NAT WANT TU BI ASOSIYEYTED WIT YU END AY DONT NID YUR HELP. AY EM NAT YUR PREND END AY DU NAT WANT TU BI ASOSIYEYTED WIT YU END AY DONT NID YUR HELP. AY EM NAT YUR PREND END AY DU NAT WANT TU BI ASOSIYEYTED WIT YU END AY DONT NID YUR HELP. AY EM NAT YUR PREND END AY DU NAT WANT TU BI ASOSIYEYTED WIT YU END AY DONT NID YUR HELP. AY EM NAT YUR PREND END AY DU NAT WANT TU BI ASOSIYEYTED WIT YU END AY DONT NID YUR HELP. AY EM NAT YUR PREND END AY DU NAT WANT TU BI ASOSIYEYTED WIT YU END AY DONT NID YUR HELP. AY EM NAT YUR PREND END AY DU NAT WANT TU BI ASOSIYEYTED WIT YU END AY DONT NID YUR HELP. AY EM NAT YUR PREND END AY DU NAT WANT TU BI ASOSIYEYTED WIT YU END AY DONT NID YUR HELP. AY EM NAT YUR PREND END AY DU NAT WANT TU BI ASOSIYEYTED WIT YU END AY DONT NID YUR HELP. -ElNiñoMonstruo (talk) 09:19, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Facepalm Facepalm Well, I don't really understand what he/she is saying. Sorry
talk) 07:44, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
I also, but not necessary understand, things that might contain insults.--
talk 11:47, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Slabtown (The Walking Dead)

There's no reason to create placeholder articles for television episodes in which haven't even aired, unless there's significant coverage beforehand, such as production, casting and filming information. The standalone articles contains nothing not already in the

copyright violation), and the summary will just replaced with an actual summary when he episode airs. All concrete reasons why placeholder articles like this should not be created prematurely. Drovethrughosts (talk) 13:01, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

@
talk 18:04, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Nice signature

What a coincidence. We have similar signatures.

talk 05:23, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

@
talk 05:28, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
I've used this signature style for 3+ years (with some minor tweaks along the way). Can you explain why your username has changed since last spring?
talk 05:33, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
@
talk 05:38, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
I don't have a problem with your signature style, and I wouldn't have a problem if someone else adopted my signature style as their own. I'm just curious where it came from. You have to admit, it is awfully similar to mine, right down to the ]
No, I've only used account is. I have only changed name. But I have not used more accounts, or do not know what you mean.--
talk 05:45, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
The ]
I have no idea, I've taken this signing of a user of wikipedia in Spanish..--
talk 05:55, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
Can you please link to the Spanish Wikipedia user? ]
It would give it you, if I agreed. What if I am sure is that this type of signature it got in the wikipedia in Spanish. Since I speak Spanish, always done out there.--
talk 06:11, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
I don't understand. Please explain differently. Where did you find this signature style? Was it from a user on the
talk 06:36, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
Are you fluent in Spanish?
talk 07:04, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

(

Levdr1lostpassword: - McVeigh doesn't have to tell you where he got the sig from nor does it matter even if he copied yours, You don't own the colours/signature so if I were you I would do something better than harassing everyone who has nearly the same sig as you!. –Davey2010(talk) 07:09, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

@
talk 07:11, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
Personally it does come across as harassing but ofcourse if you're not then I apologize :), If there is a serious issue you should probably report it at the appropriate venue, Me needs sleep me thinks! –Davey2010(talk) 07:17, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@
talk 07:33, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
@]
@
Levdr1lostpassword: - I apologize for that edit summary, I have a habit of being rather blunt at times, But I admit it was uncivil and completely uncalled for so I apologize for that, I've struck out the entire comments :), Cheers, –Davey2010(talk) 15:29, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
@
talk 19:15, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Replaceable fair use File:Lisette Morelos.png

Thanks for uploading File:Lisette Morelos.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 05:53, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Bradford. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 15:33, 2 December 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 15:33, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

A page you started (La calle en que vivimos) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating La calle en que vivimos, McVeigh!

Wikipedia editor James1011R just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

sources could be better

To reply, leave a comment on James1011R's talk page.

Learn more about

page curation
.

It would help, if...

you could add links to the articles you are creating. Nearly all those with parenthetical titles can have links placed on the titles without the parentheses to disambiguate and link your new articles. See Estafa de amor and Vidas cruzadas as examples. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 05:52, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@
talk 05:58, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
When your article title has a "( )", then do a quick search for the title without that and if it exists, please add a link to your article. The more linkage, the better the encyclopedia is and the more likely someone will find your articles. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 06:00, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I understand, I will try to do that.--
talk 06:02, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

A page you started (María Isabel (1966 telenovela)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating

María Isabel (1966 telenovela)
, McVeigh!

Wikipedia editor Redlock just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

These telenovela articles are very appreciated, but IMHO, it would probably be better for you to make a smaller number of more in-depth articles. Just a suggestion!

To reply, leave a comment on Redlock's talk page.

Learn more about

page curation
.

Template:Televisa telenovelas 1970s

why change it?Alk@ 18:19, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mi rival

The article Mi rival has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable TV series..

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. G S Palmer (talkcontribs) 03:07, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mi primer amor

The article Mi primer amor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable TV series.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. G S Palmer (talkcontribs) 03:08, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of La maestra Méndez

The article La maestra Méndez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable telenovela.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. G S Palmer (talkcontribs) 03:09, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It would also help...

If you would check if the links to the cast, etc., are really the actors in the telenovela articles you are creating. I had to cleanup a lot of wrong links - I think I've done with the 1960s ones. Please make sure you cleanup after yourself. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 21:31, 12 December 2014


Angelique Boyer

I've referred the issue to the BLP noticeboard. Discuss there, please.

Townlake (talk) 18:17, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Merry Christmas

Merry Christmas!!
Hello McVeigh, Sorry it's a bit late but I wish you and your family a Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year,

Thanks for all your help on the 'pedia!

   –Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 01:06, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Content requires sources

Please

]

As you notice that you're a fan or follow this actress. You really need references to know what year was born ?.--
talk 22:53, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
Fan enemy or indifferent ]
Clear and for you is easier to reach and destroy all, instead of helping, right ?.--
talk 23:13, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
Please concentrate on policies, sources and article content and do not ]

stating an intent to edit war is a good way to get yourself blocked. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 23:24, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Dear Bradford,
HAPPY NEW YEAR Hoping 2015 will be a great year for you! Thank you for your contributions!
From a fellow editor,
--FWiW Bzuk (talk)

This message promotes

WikiLove. Originally created by Nahnah4
(see "invisible note").

A barnstar for you!

The Writer's Barnstar
(Talk page) ★ 09:00, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
@
talk 17:08, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Conmemorating the candidate to kick day.

Great conmemoration to McVeigh because of the 7/1/2015

Mr. McVeigh, i conmemorate you with the trophy of the great IRC spectator for making a public enthusiasm in this epic day to remember.

Hope that occasions like this don't occur again to create in memory of the date an unique ambient to the affected ones.

A grateful hug, McVeigh.

-- ElGatoSaez | Contáctame 02:27 8 ene 2015 (UTC)

Amores de barrioI believe you are also using unsourced content as of the telenovelas amores de barrio, so you should also correct that one too.

@
talk 04:25, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Yours does have a reliable source on amores de barrio either.

@
Terminales

A kitten for you!

Here you have a kitten. Hope you pass a great time with your new pet.

RomanLier (talk) 02:19, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No kittens for you, I said. Stop. --RomanLier (talk) 03:04, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Vandalism"Mr. McVeigh:

Let me tell you that my acts on your Talk Page are not vandalism, the same thing was correctly done on the Spanish Wikipedia (see, for example this edit and this other one), and it seems you're currently blocked there.

So, please delete that message.

Greetings from RomanLier (talk) 02:54, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@
talk 02:57, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
@
McVeigh
:
Of course not, if it shouldn't be there, then it shouldn't be here too.
And please respect if an user wants to delete his/her own message, don't undo the changes.
--RomanLier (talk) 03:04, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@
talk 03:08, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
@
McVeigh
:
I see, I understand that we don't have the same rules. I talked in #wikipedia-en and got it solved.
And please don't be as agressive the next time we communicate.
Greetings, --RomanLier (talk) 03:25, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
¿Vamos a seguir?, ya te dije que no deseo borrar el mensaje, esto no es es.wiki. ¿Está bien?.--
talk 13:11, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
No, it's all cleared. Keep the message. --RomanLier (talk) 16:24, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

My reason to change your edit is because it is wrong. Danna started her carrer in 80s, when she was a child, and selected filmography is because that is not complete list of her projects.

WikiProject Latin music invitation

You are invited to join invite to join the WikiProject Latin music, a WikiProject dedicated to improving articles related to music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and languages of Ibero-America. Simply click here to accept! Or, if you're interested in reading more on Latin music, you may want to check out the Latin music portal.

Erick (talk) 23:41, 27 January 2015 (UTC) [reply]

@

talk 00:01, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

@
McVeigh: O_o Oh.. okay. I didn't noticed you changed your name. lol Erick (talk) 00:04, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
Oh, no problem :p.--
talk 00:08, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Los Miserables

@
Así en el Barrio como en el Cielo
page. Do you have any difficulty in identifying <ref>...</ref> syntax tags?
By the way, other additional information on the info box and cast were based on the opening credits. The opening credit IS an acceptable source in Wikipedia. Please refer to
Wikipedia:Published where a television broadcast; a streaming video or audio source on the Internet is listed as one of the example of published source. The opening credits and episodes are broadcasted on tv. They are also accessible on the Internet, more specifically, the official website. Therefore, they do fall into published and accessible source.checkY
Curiously, after reverting my edits, you have "updated" the page with some, but not all, of the "unsourced" content which you have reverted a few minutes earlier (obviously, with few errors and different arrangement). You could have removed only the "unsourced" contents, instead of reverting the whole thing (and retype and rearrange them again). I'm not sure what you are trying to do. Take a look here: Así en el barrio, como en el cielo: Difference between revisions
Make use of the
Talk
pages before making any full revert. Clarify and ask first.
There should not be any default page format for any Wikipedia articles. Any additional and relevant information with proper citations should be welcomed. Wikipedia is not merely for listing down the cast members of a certain series. Are you trying to make all articles on telenovelas with the same format/content range? Maybe you should just change the title to
Snakes and Ladders
, the official English title, as you did with other pages. See also: What Wikipedia is not

It is also not a place to discard other's contribution and then reuse it as your own.[3] See also: Rubí La Descarada

Saludos.
Kieferwc (talk) 17:09, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bradford (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I demand my unlock. Since user Duduty96 edits were obvious vandalism, the user started using different ips to remove information from articles, Here I leave some of the tests [13], [14], Was then created an account to continue vandalizing. Leave you several notices to stop and all of my warnings ignored them. Later appeared Bbb23, leaving me a message. After that I didn't turn, just search online reliable sources and put them in the article, as seen here. After that, I went to the discussion of the article and leave this message, thing simply ignored. Then I try to prevent vandalism in wikipedia and that ends up being blocked I am? Does not seem fair, I am which end locked and the user

Talk 03:23, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unlock request{{unblock}}

  • The block expires in roughly 9 hours, so you might want to just serve it out. ☺ · Salvidrim! ·  13:57, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
To clarify, that is 18:45, 16 April 2015 GMT. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 14:07, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"18:45" is subjective to time zones. "Roughly 9 hours" (now closer to 8h30) is objective. ;) ☺ · Salvidrim! ·  14:18, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


page Hasta el fin del mundo in EnglishCould you correct the table in the section "Awards and nominations", please ? Have a table is not mandatory. --Gilles2014 (talk) 22:55, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And where it says that it is not obligatory?, I can show some link where it says that?. To different things in the French wikipedia does not mean that it should also be in this wikipedia.--
talk) 00:08, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
answer to Philipp J Fry: Could you correct the table in the section "Awards and nominations" on the page
talk) 01:09, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

answer to Philipp J Fry: I don't speak of the content of the table. There is a lack of frame in this table when I see the table on the visitor's interface. Can you correct that, please?--Gilles2014 (talk) 20:18, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@
talk) 21:50, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
answer to hilipp J Fry : I watch the table on a computer. I confirm you that there is a lack of frame for the cell (the line under ) the mention "New York Latin ACE Awards". Ask another people to observe this table, pleaseand cease to undo my correction.--Gilles2014 (talk) 00:48, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@
talk) 01:02, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Fanny Schiller films

But I tell you better create all those articles before you binding them to the Filmography of the actress. To the extent I understand used so many links red is not allowed.--
talk) 16:49, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, that would make it more difficult to create them if you can't click a red link. If content is missing it should be red linked. Hiding red links is unproductive to growth on wikipedia. Far better to root out what is missing and stub it.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:50, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

I'll be damned if I'm going to make 50 odd separate edits to that article everytime I want an article red linked. As it is the 1926 film has been started which you've shut off. Why not take a trip on the

Caracas cable car and leave this alone eh?♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:16, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

When somebody is telling you that they intend to clear the red links, when you start reverting them and hampering their efforts then it becomes disruptive. Don't do this again.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:48, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I just realised you're the guy who started all of the telenovelas which I encouraged you on a while back and helped save some from AFD. I also remember defending the massive number of red links in your telenovela templates, arguing that they were constructive for what you were doing. I'm guessing that somebody kept on at you to the point that you now think it's policy to hide red links?♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:15, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@
talk) 21:20, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
The only editor I know who obsesses about red links and templates is Rob Sinden. You've let that person who most of us disagree with at the actors/film projects get to you. You'd find it annoying if you created a template of red links for Venezuelan telenovelas and I came along and delinked them all, stopping you from starting them wouldn't you? Anyway, there's a massive amount of films missing for Latin America, particularly Mexico. I will be create a lot of director templates with red links for films in them. You're welcome to help start them.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:29, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@
talk) 22:14, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
I'm going to create some director navigation templates. I'll create a page of templates for Mexico and one for Argentina. It is best done by director than filmography but I will finish the others.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:03, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Can you expand Fernanda Villeli?♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:00, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@
talk) 21:48, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

page on Marco de Paula

A page you started (Camaleona) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Camaleona, Philip J Fry!

Wikipedia editor Robvanvee just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good job Phillip!

To reply, leave a comment on Robvanvee's talk page.

Learn more about

page curation
.

Danna Garcia

Hola! Quiero informarte que hice unos cambios en pagina de Danna, porque faltaron algunos proyectos. Todos cambios son reales, pero aqui te dejo fuentes. RUTA 35: http://www.cisnerosmediadist.com/es/media/ruta-35-la-valvula-de-escape https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fZC7PGQCYNI

LA OTRA RAYA DEL TIGRE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_OVZP2nYYU http://www.filmaffinity.com/es/film604445.html

Danna Garcia Toy Story 3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbTkukqjExw http://www.peopleenespanol.com/article/danna-garcia-una-barbie-de-carne-y-hueso

Paloma / La Paloma

You reverted the changes I made, stating that 'your source' says AMOR DE BARRIO is a remake of LA PALOMA (1995). Well, let me say that your source knows nothing of telenovelas. There are plenty of lazy 'journalists' out there. AMOR DE BARRIO is a partial remake of PALOMA, produced in 1975 and later remade as MI QUERIDA ISABEL (1996). Have you even watched AMOR DE BARRIO? Have you seen the opening credits?


Read the synopsis for all three, AMOR DE BARRIO, PALOMA, AND LA PALOMA. They are available here, on Wikipedia.


There you go: http://www.tvynovelas.com/mx/tus-novelas/lo-destacado/15/04/2/Amor-de-barrio-contara-dos-historias-en-una.html Please add it, I don't know how. TVyNovelas is an official Televisa publication. Please reinstate my changes. Ahí también detalló pormenores del proyecto en el que, además de la trama de la telenovela Muchacha de barrio, rescató a Paloma, la heroína de la telenovela del mismo nombre que en 1975 interpretaron Ofelia Medina y Andrés García.

Perhaps you should use more reliable sources rather than no-name gossip websites.

Nomination for deletion of Template:Telenovelas broadcast by Venevisión in 2010s

page Las_trampas_del_deseoYou need to stop vandalizing the information that I am correcting. As I said before, "X: THC is the correct copyright holder of the music as per US LAW. An editor of this page, Philip J Fry is in violation of US law for repeatedly and purposely falsyfing information." The correct band, X: THC does not yet have a wikipedia page. I have entered in the links ([4][5]) for proof that X: THC wrote this song, NOT "THC" or whatever other band you falsely choose to credit. WHY DONT YOU GO TO THOSE PAGES AND SEE FOR YOURSELF? Yet you persist in illegally falsifying information and breaking United States copyright law. CEASE AND DESIST! -Mrjordanss

Thank you for shouting at me and his message of good faith. Already search Google the name of the band and his information was correct, but remove references since they are not reliable sources. I also ask that you
talk) 23:14, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Angelique Boyer reversion

@
talk) 02:58, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
Thank you for the quick reply and explanation. Cheers. fdsTalk 03:00, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Las Tontas No Van al Cielo

@
talk) 23:05, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
OK I have moved this to Las tontas no van al cielo, hopefully that is what you actually wanted. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:42, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Issue about the word "Co-lead role","Lead role","recurring role"I Prefer the word Protagonist,Antagonist and Supporting role because they give the Character the specificity it needs.Its not a matter of editing.As for "Co-lead role" it cannot be used in place of Main Antagonist.Simply because Antagonist's often play a vital role in the story.

I do alot of research before I do any changes.I therefore ask you to do changes in all the pages that you have done the latter changes.I have the list. Adriana Louvier Daniela Castro Luis Roberto Guzmán

I contact you on other issues.Adios

talk) 08:19, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Issues regarding Lead role,Co-lead roleAs I stated earlier,Lead role sounds rather ambiguous.If one may break it for the reader it can be simpler because Protagonist and Antagonist makes one understand without clicking on the explained page to find out.

Lead role may represent the "Main protagonist" and even "The Main antagonist".Therefore the reader will understand the specific role one played in the show. Good day.

talk) 17:15, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Lead role,Co-lead role and Recurring role

Lead role,Co-lead role,Recurring role

>>>Yeah I do understand a little Spanish and that's why am strongly against the latter words.In a Telenovela We have; PROTAGONISTS -Main Protagonist that may vary in number depending on the plot. -Co-protagonist that may also vary in number.

ANTAGONISTS -Main Antagonist that are also in the category on the Lead Role depending on the plot of the story eg.Teresa(telenovela)Angelique Boyer's role

SUPPORTING ROLE Depends on the weight of the role played by the actor SPECIAL PARTICIPATION Roles played to bring special themes and normally come as a signature in the story.

]

Lead role

Wiki Loves Pride
!

You are invited to participate in

Wiki Loves Pride
!

Or, view or update the current list of Tasks. This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. Visit the group's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome!

If you have any questions, please

leave a message on the campaign's main talk page
.


Thanks, and happy editing!

User:OR drohowa

Telenovela "La Vecina"/"Yo no creo en los Hombres"

Telenovela "La Vecina"/"Yo no creo en los Hombres"
Hello Philip J Fry,

I live in the United States, in Virginia, and I just want to let you know that "La Vecina" starts this coming Monday June 22, 2015 at 3pm/2c. Also after "Que Te Perdone Dios" ends on Friday July 10, 2015 "Yo no creo en los Hombres" starts on Monday july 13, 2015. So if you can please add that information on the Univision Wiki page. I added it, but you took it off. I would never add false information on Univision Wiki or Unimas Wiki. Max mouse82 (talk) 15:25, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@
talk) 15:30, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply
]


@
talk) 15:49, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply
]


@
talk) 16:07, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply
]


@
Philip J Fry: I noticed you updated the Univision wiki page on Programing, I told you ahead of time, and I already had done it. And I know you told me that I needed reliable sources, well again I live in the United States and I cant see why Unision would air a false commercial about there programing. I dont know if you have herard, but Univision has gotten very strict, and the same time there programing is lame. Dont you guys get Univision over there in Venezuela
?


@
talk) 17:02, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply
]


@
Philip J Fry: Alrigth alright, cool man. Are you able to visit this page from Venezuela? [[15]] you can also get reliable references there. Anyways, Im glad you have uodated the Univision
wiki page.


@
talk) 18:27, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply
]


@
Philip J Fry
:
You are not very clear to me with the "ping" page, and I dont know how to sign. I told you before that I am just learning how to use the Wiki page.


@
talk) 18:57, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply
]


@
List of programs broadcast by Televisa networks it can be arranged by the time they air, instead of the date it aired? Im just asking if it is possible becuase Que te perdone Dios airing time in Mexico
changed from 6:15pm to 7:15pm.


@
talk) 17:41, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply
]


@ is your article, right? But ok, whatever you say.


@
talk) 17:53, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply
]


@
List of programs broadcast by Televisa networks
. And who would I ask about the "sign" comment section? Either way, I'll find out in time on my own how that works man.
@
talk) 18:22, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Daniela Castro

I never understood the last message you sent please review it because I was confused since your words did not synchronize properly.I think I wasn't the recipient.

Lack of Edit SummariesWhen editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. Use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Godsy(TALKCONT) 01:34, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Straight up

None
I can tell pretty much how these 3 novelas will play out here in Univision USA once they are rready to air here. Take notes man,. and I dont need no guide or resourses that you speak of, get me? I dont care if you belive me or not, but this is how is going to go down....


El color de la pasión will replace La sombra del pasado
in August

in December

Antes muerta que Lichita will replace Amores con trampa in August

Max mouse82 (talk) 14:36, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I don't really know that it is what you want. And I don't know that you want to tell me this to me, in all cases when these soap operas will premiere because they will be placed on page of Univision programming.--
talk) 17:04, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Los miserables/Pasión prohibida

Re: Gamer's Guide to Pretty Much Everything

I generally disagree with the notion that it's okay to remove references once something's aired. A title is likely not going to be an issue, but we should not be removing airdate references and things of that nature. The strength of this encyclopedia is in its references. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:42, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The problem with that is that that the source links can eventually potentially become dead or change and therefore reflect incorrect information, and other sources can't always be found. For example, Kirby Buckets' episode guide is a bit off over on Zap2 if you compare it to the Kirby Buckets page even though the episodes already aired. It seems to be okay for upcoming episodes, but after that it seems the guides for some shows get messed up sometimes. Amaury (talk) 14:56, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
We should have a link to a scheduling guide of some sort either as a column reference or a general reference in the references section. Using RTitle for each cite to the same source for all aired episodes is generally not necessary if other references for the same info are in the article and obvious. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:01, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'd be down for that. Having it as a column reference might be better as it's right there when editing the episode guide and you don't have to scroll down to the references section to make sure there are sources. Amaury (talk) 15:22, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I understand all that, but references
talk) 18:22, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
For reference, Geraldo Perez and Cyphoidbomb, this is the original edit of mine.
In my opinion, that also counts. Since the series premiered yesterday evening, sources confirming its (or any show's) release are no longer needed. Amaury (talk) 18:32, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No need to rush stuff, wait for episode to have finished airing. I generally like to wait a few days to make sure it shows up on iTunes and Amazon (if they carry it) to show wide-spread support for air date and title. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:35, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I think that an article while you have more references, will be better, (of course that they are reliable sources). For example in the article "Mi corazón es tuyo", there are 50 references and all talk about the premiere of the telenovela and other things, and already spent a year since it was created the article and the references are still intact.--
talk) 19:08, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Tierra de reyes page

Question, Why would you revert my edit? That was the correct English translation of Tierra de reyes. Reyes means kings in the Spanish language.

About adding a plot to Vidas Robadas(Stolen lives)/Infamia(torn apart)Hi Philip

I saw your editting and I found out that it is missing a plot or synopsis. So I edited it in a way that it has a good plot. If you think it is disruptive, add a new plot which is different from mine.

Best Regards, Dagem Yilma Dagem Yilma (talk) 17:49, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Paola Núñez

Let me remind you I haven't added Paola Núñez as 1985.Infact I undid the revision.I insist that the actress was born on 1978.I wonder who undid that before and now that I try to add it you seem to differ.I'll ask you for one last time to do more research on the latter page before you vent on what I did not do. In terms of Sources I'll add one to Paola's page to support she was born in 1978 or you can add one since you are in support of it.

nyanchy 13:53, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Reverting without reasons

I bet you have minimal intersection with the word series.I've told you time and again that Latin actors/actresses have a unique way of describing there characters.Your edits are well referred to but you filmography sections lack or have clarification.Therefore you should seize from turning Wikipedia articles into a soccer match that we do and undo.Whatever I did was correct as you do the same without reason. nyanchy 08:33, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia is no mans territory nor anyone's literature exposure skills so am going to ask you to refrain from your base less and personalizing Wikipedia articles you can help by contributing more than executing your self.Good day! nyanchy 21:24, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Kimberly Dos Ramos, ¿Quién es Quién?

Andrew J West

Hi, Thanks for the message.

As I've said before, his brother Cody contacted me and said Andrew is currently 31 years of age.

So by my math, his year of birth is 1983 as he turned 31 last November.

I'm well aware of what the Internet has his year of birth as, but if his brother is not a reliable source then I don't know what is!!

Thanks

Georgie


Thanks for the reply, how does one "add a reference"?

Thanks

Georgie

Page moves

@
talk) 11:29, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
Mentir para Vivir has been restored The JPStalk to me 15:30, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Flavio Medina

You often do things that you yourself condemn.You wrote that IMDb is not a reliable source yet to you use it.So don't lecture me about 3RR.I know it exists and can't stand your repetitive complains to me.Am already tired with your edits. nyanchy 07:39, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Moving of pages

Hi,I moved the Corazón indomable page because I know its correct.I don't dis agree with you on the issue that it was produced in UK dubbed in English.I live in an English-Speaking country and we used the English title only but it was never attached to the novels.Everything remained in Spanish from the theme song,to opening credits,closing and even the commercials.So I don't understand why you disagree with all my edits but when others do it you agree.Its not that the page did not use the "Corazón indomable" name before it was redirected because of the title card.Therefore I will not explain my self to you severally and you keep on belittling my edits.And please stop telling administrators what I haven't done when reporting,remain true

nyanchy 12:19, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

WP:ANI

Raúl Taibo

@
talk) 09:06, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
Oh OK, I thought seems as you also edited Venezuelan and Colombian ones you were into them all!♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:20, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@
talk) 09:25, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Julie Restifo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Julie Restifo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julie Restifo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 00:10, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia especially the telenovela. but can i ask a favor? i'm a huge fan of telenovela and the cast especially Angelique Boyer so i get really disappointed when i visit her wiki page and there is not a photo of her. Do you think you can add one to her Wikipedia? thanks in advance and if it's out of your position and you cant do it, its okay. Shelloh (talk) 05:17, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting for multiple page moveI have come to ask you to please move the fiur pages back to their original names.This is because they often mislead the reader as some of them may not use the name used in the particular country.The telenovelas often get to foreign countries only when dubbed in English but the title remains the same.Others often chang their names during yranslation,may be because a similar title exists in that particular ciuntry.So am reqeusting you to move them back for the sake of people like us.Who often rely on original title in our country and WestvAfrica. nyanchy 21:41, 2 September 2015 (UTC)


My browser has a problem can you please skip the first one and read the second.

User:Nyanchokanyanchy 22:26, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Danna Garcia

El dia es hoy is television series produced by Cenpro. In Cafe con aroma de mujer she didnt play lead role, she was secondary cast, and Al noerte del corazon she was main villan. Also she dide a voice role in The story 3 as Barbie https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbTkukqjExw and played lead role in movie Carrusel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QKZbn3DOFSQ. Where is a series La otra raya del tigre in filmography list https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_OVZP2nYYU Your edits are totally wrong. Why you dont admit it or just investigate better...

http://www.eltiempo.com/archivo/documento/MAM-359458 Here is a proof that her character is Milena on El dia es hoy La otra raya del tigre http://m.filmaffinity.com/es/movie.php?id=604445 Toy Story 3 http://www.peopleenespanol.com/article/danna-garcia-una-barbie-de-carne-y-hueso Carrusel http://entretenimiento.terra.com.co/cine/se-estrena-la-pelicula-carrusel-con-la-actriz-danna-garcia,b62fa9b939a59310VgnVCM4000009bcceb0aRCRD.html Lo imperdonable http://tvolucion.esmas.com/entretenimiento/noticias/televisa-espectaculos/313189/danna-garcia-tendra-participacion-especial-imperdonable/ from televia oficial page.

Forbidden Passions/Forbidden Love aka Pasión prohibida

Hey,I read a note from you in my talk page.Let me continue from where you stopped:Because you said so?Or are you Mr.Perfect?YOU CAN HAVE IT.Its just a poster dude.I don't need a fruitless world war debate or an edit war that you always use as a shield with you.Have it deleted too. I never knew better posters were suggested by you.I'll ask you to stop leaving baseless topics on my talk page.Also stop giving unconstructive warnings.I did not leave a messege on your talk page when I changed the poster or non the less undermine your dear poster.I am losing my cool.Next time I will not be this kind. zzzzNyanchokanyanchy 16:36, 9 September 2015 (UTC) nyanchy 16:36, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Respect is mutual.Ok.I did not get you but I fixed the pieces together.You reverted to your image,period! You seem,to comment about an edit war,I haven't seen it.I am simply pissed of with your messages on my talk page that make me seem not to understand you.As per your explanation you said Mónica Spear,may her soul rest in peace and Jencarlos Canela were the only stars what of Rebecca Jones?Regarding the issue of main characters on posters consider removing a speck in your eye first by checking if any of the main stars are present in the

El color de la pasión poster.The last time I checked,Michelle Renaud and René Strickler were there.Consider looking for Esmeralda Pimentel and Erik Elias that means I dont foeget easily.Forgive me but that's all I had to say.Nyanchokanyanchy
20:55, 9 September 2015 (UTC) nyanchy 20:55, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

On the matter of the image,I found it more appropriate because it had the logo of the novela.So I don't change images to please myself or provoke anyone.Therefore I will change it next year .Am sorry if I was offensive.Salam nyanchy 21:07, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Therefore as I said you can keep the latter poster. Or are you not reading the messages I leave you?That's not an answer.I asked about

El color de la pasión
.As per Rebecca Jones let her be,God knows what her role was. I didn't start a discussion about her.But since this is not a discussion lets close it.Good day nyanchy 21:20, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry?You seem to be going nuts what's up with you.As far as I need no fear you can investigate and you can check if I have any other accounts.Am off to bed I hope I wont find your usual baseless messages on my talk page. nyanchy 23:42, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Philip, you still need to submit diffs that show behavioral similarities at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nyanchoka. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:39, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Help me pleasePhily J Fry I didn't know about Wikipedia then much... I'm sorry if it look like that but i was editing from a phone. her comes the favor I wanted to ask of you when the wikipedia is unprotected. I'll like you to help me develop her award section using the following sources I'll send to you through your talk page.

you could save a soul by doing the edit for me. I'm going to do things in a professional way. if I send you the edit here. please you'll help me do things the right way.. once again I'm sorry.. And if you're going to help me for a better communications if you are a twitter user ..tweet me @Ezolanski please and thanks if you are going to reply

@
Talk 17:55, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

still begging phil

OK I know @Phily J Fry . But please you can help me. All I want is for you to edit the awards & nomination. you can put the ranking table. I want to collaborate as you said, but since I'm typing from a mobile phone instead of a laptop, The sources link didn't upload cause I got a message from wikipedia saying its copyright.. so what is remaining is the sources and I don't know how to give it to you except if I give you the heading of the article so that you can extract the links yourself or you contact me on twitter... or do you have a better idea? but all I want is for you to help me please .. please cause it'll mean a whole lot to someone

Lo imperdonableDanna already made her appearence on LI. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2a2HQhtRV8g This is video from Televisa oficial promo. http://www.loimperdonablecapitulos.com/ Here is the episode.

Hi Alex Visekruna, could you use your main account instead of be using ips?. Or is very difficult to do that?.--
(talk) 14:51, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Philip J Fry! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.