User talk:Fetchcomms/Archive 9

A new(ish) user, nothing all that experienced, I put up a CSD notice on the Ceasary page, and it's down just like that? Who knew I had such power! Mwahahahahaha! But seriously, thank you for taking care of that. I'd do it myself, but I don't want to get in trouble. I just looked it up in regards to their advertising, using a Wonder Woman lookalike, and found a clear advert here also. Glad that I could help! Kalmbach (talk) 03:15, 14 July 2010 (UTC) Combining Art and Engineering for a quarter century.

Congratulations on becoming an admin! I'm sure you'll be great, so long as you don't

GiveCake

}}

:| TelCoNaSpVe :| 14:02, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Hello, Fetchcomms. You have new messages at Joe Gazz84's talk page.
Message added 21:35, 14 July 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Reply Joe Gazz84 (user)•(talk)•(contribs) 21:35, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Thankyou for letting me know, and apologies for tagging it incorrectly. --

JCGTU (talk) 15:02, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

I don't know why you are asking me... I have no clue who she is, and I can only suggest to you searching on Google Books or Google Scholar. My only edit to that page was adding a tag. It would be greatly helpful if you could expand the Wikipedia article about her as well, as it is in need of some work. —fetch·comms 16:29, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Dear. Fetchcomms,

Was talking to Narodnik and he helped reference my page and completed everything for me. Would you review the page for acceptance?

Thank you

It has already been created, no need to ask for another review. —fetch·comms 20:22, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

A common misconception is modeling new pages after existing ones. Unless you use a

notable enough for inclusion. —fetch·comms

20:17, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

A barnstar for your trouble

		All Around Amazing Barnstar
		Awarded to Fetchcomms for his continued dedication to AfC and other areas and not getting too distracted witha ll his exciting new buttons! ;) HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:48, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Recent article placed on hold

OK--the first three sources are the same link, and it's just a listing of the statistics and such. That doesn't constitute "

notable by itself for some special reason. The individual "School of Whatever Subject" bits don't generally need their own article, as they aren't usually notable enough by themselves. —fetch·comms

23:58, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

I appeciate your help, and I promise I won't abuse the trust you have shown in me. GregJackP Boomer! 03:14, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Regarding User:Fetchcomms/Waterfall can you tell me why this page is required? The practice of protecting things by cascade-protected user pages has been discontinued for some time now I believe. Would you consider unprotecting it and using Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items instead? That way, there is a central place where these things can be discussed. Thanks — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:49, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

I realize that, but it's just my personal listing of all the high-risk templates that have been protected already. I don't see any harm in adding another protected userpage listing like all the others that have existed, but if you feel strongly about this, I'll just delete it. —fetch·comms 19:05, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Okay, but the thing is that is doesn't have any additional benefit that I can see. Doing what you have done does not make it "more protected". And it just makes it more of a pain when it is actually decided that protection is unwarranted. (It feels slightly awkward having to go into someone's userspace.) Protection is a project-wide issue and not related to any particular user. Therefore I still feel that these pages are not helpful. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 14:19, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Deleted, then. Your reasoning makes sense, as always. —fetch·comms 20:05, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

I am strongly concerned that you gave IPBE to GregJackP (talk · contribs). Could you describe the review process you went through when determining that he was a valid candidate for IPBE? Hipocrite (talk) 20:04, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

He was caught under an Opera Mini rangeblock. From my experience, these rangeblocks are usually just precautionary proxy blocks, except that Opera Mini uses proxies as a part of their software design, not like Tor. Greg's an established user, and I left a note for Brandon, the blocking CU. I am aware of the SPI case he was involved in recently, but the result was no evidence of socking and the block he received last month was not for that reason. The SPI verified that he uses mobile browsers quite often, and I didn't see any harm in giving him IPBE when he is on a shared IP like that. Was there something in particular that you had issues with? —fetch·comms 20:17, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

I dispute that GregJackP is an established user. I suggest that he is a highly problematic agenda editor, who is, at this point, not trustworthy enough for IPBE. Hipocrite (talk) 20:22, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Will you take your global warming accusations elsewhere? He was caught on a routine block that had nothing whatsoever to do with any specific editing or editors; I will not starve the project of users just because of your disputes with him. He is established in the fact that he has several thousand edits and has been around for some time; I never said "well-established in your book". This is a completely legitimate use for IPBE, and if he ends up misusing the privilege, it'll be revoked and him possibly blocked. I already gave him the disclaimer. I refuse to be roped into everyone's disagreements over global warming and whatnot, so if you have further issues, ask a checkuser to verify again the need. —fetch·comms 20:29, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

(edit conflict) Thanks for taking a look. If it becomes relevent, I will do so. As a side note, the dispute that GregJackP has with me and WMC has nothing to do with Global Warming. Best wishesHipocrite (talk) 20:30, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

That's nice. Arguing is all the same to me. —fetch·comms 20:32, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Apologies for the ec - I was adding some pleasantries when you responded - I just wanted to be clear that I have no concerns with what you did now that I understand that it was evaluated. Hipocrite (talk) 20:33, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Mm, I could be nicer too. I just get tired of disputing users. Always good to have someone check over your work, though. Cheers, —fetch·comms 20:36, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

I would still try to find another one or two independent sources--some of the content still relies on their own website. Also, the list of notable alumni should be backed up by sources, too. Other pages with poor sourcing is unfortunate, and we may even have to

delete them later--so it's best to have new articles sourced well. —fetch·comms

01:20, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Re. University of Mississippi School of Law which was AFC, now live, acceped by Fetchcomms 17 July 2010.  Chzz  ►  12:43, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

 Done

I have asked Yoninah to supply more details of what needs fixing.  Chzz  ►  12:58, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Aß. Since you had some involvement with the Aß redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Bridgeplayer (talk) 01:11, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

-Thank you fetchcomms for welcoming me to wikipedia. I have become involved because I am interested in treeshaping. I joined wiki after seeing the history of the article . On the article page and the discussion page that I have been watching for months now, there seems to be a lot of conflict and domination cordinated by the creator of the word arborsculpture. The article has been completely changed and does not reflect the reality of the art form. When I google arborsculpture I am lead to a marketing funnel that has merchantdise for sale. When I pointed this out it was ignored as the comment was not in agreement with the editor duff who wants to be in control. What can I do about this ? I am only a new editor and after making three comments have landed my self with a sock puppet investigation from duff.Please advise me of the best form of action. Thanks Sydney Bluegum (talk) 04:28, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi there, and welcome. Fetchcomms is away for a few days, so you're getting an answer from me, I'm afraid.

I've had a bit of a look at the article, discussions, etc. Quite surprising that this topic is so hotly disputed, and has been for a long time - see Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2008-12/Arborsculpture.

Re. the sock-puppet accusations; the case was closed, with no evidence, so I think you can simply forget that, put it behind you.

I see that other editors have advised you about editing other articles, and this actually is good advice. It is important to remember that

there is no deadline

. Wikipedia will be around for many years, so if one article is a bit 'wrong' for a while, it really doesn't matter. With that in mind, I do suggest you get involved in editing a few different articles, a) because it'll be more fun than arguing, b) because you will gain more experience of Wikipedia, c) because you would later be in a much better position to argue any of the complex problems with that specific article.

Maybe you could join Wikipedia:WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening, or any other project groups tht interest you.

Please note, I am not dismissing your concerns about the specific article; there are ways to

resolve things

; merely, I am saying that there are 6,822,800 -1 other articles that all need attention, and if that one is problematic, then it might be best to leave it for later.

If I can personally help or advise in any way, please feel free to leave a note on my own talk page, or get live help. Best,  Chzz  ►  13:49, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors Backlog Elimination Drive! We have now passed the halfway point, so here's an update. Progress Report - Progress toward the targets has been good. 751 articles out of the approximately 1,600 we would like to get completed by the end of the month were done by July 15, so we will be very close to meeting the target for volume. However, we would like to clear all of the 2008 articles from the backlog, and there are still 892 left to do. Please consider choosing one of these older articles when looking for something to copy edit. If we focus our firepower we can completely wipe out 2008 from the queue. Participation Report - 95 people signed up for the July drive. This is a great result compared to May, when we had 36. However, in May only one person that signed up didn't do any copy edits, and in July only 59 of the 95 have posted any copy edits on the big board. The task may seem insurmountable but please remember that if all 95 participants copy edit just one article a day from now until the end of the month, we will eliminate 1,300 more articles from the backlog. So please consider participating at whatever level you can! All contributions are appreciated. This newsletter was prepared for the GOCE by Diannaa (Talk), S Masters (talk), and The Raptor Let's talk .

Hi Fetchcomms--

I added a few sources for my article. Would you mind taking another look? I look forward to your comments. Thanks! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Gbiasi/NationalAssociationoftheRemodelingIndustry Gbiasi (talk) 15:25, 19 July 2010 (UTC)gbiasi

Hi there. Fetchcomms is away for a few days, so I'm keeping an eye on his talk page.

The draft in

reliable sources

.

Please note that the following are examples only, for illustration; it is not an exhaustive list, but to try to explain the issues;

Non-neutral statements

• the organization continues to prosper
• meetings allow individual members the opportunity to directly participate
• an impartial panel of judges who are experts

-These are not facts, they are opinion.

Unreferenced assertions

• roots go back to 1935
• more than 100,000 thousand individuals [...etc...] belong to NARI
• provided the remodeling industry with its first formalized standard of expertise

• Some sections are not encyclopaedic, for example "Code of Ethics" probably fails
  WP:NOT
  ; unless independently documented and analysed in some independent reliable source, that type of content is not permitted.

• In addition, the draft has lots of advert-like wording; the sections on phrases such as NARI has positioned itself as a strong influencer in the building industry as a whole, having potential to change economic climates... is, frankly, pure spam.

It is extremely difficult to write a neutral article when you have a

There is no deadline. Best,  Chzz  ► 

14:09, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Just to let you know that the Opera Mini range block has been resolved and Brandon removed the IPBE for me. I really appreciated that you helped me with this as I use my mobile phone quite a good deal to edit. Anyway, just wanted to let you know that it is not an issue anymore, and that the flag was removed since I don't need it anymore. Thanks, GregJackP Boomer! 16:53, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

You deleted the Caesary wiki seen at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caesary. Why did you accuse it of being "promotional"? Lots of people were using that page as a reference. Caesary is a newly launched MMORTS game with press releases already posted on the web. MPOGD.com had a press released on Caesary when it first launched. It's absurd to think that a page used for reference would be deleted because it's being accused of "promoting" a product. Windrider07 (talk) 18:15, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi there. Fetchcomms is away for a few days.

The article was correctly deleted as

CSD G11

, as it was "Unambiguous advertising or promotion [...] would need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic.

The first part of the article included the text, has been regarded as one of the best browser games of Year 2010, which is clearly

fact

.

The bulk of the article, the "Gameplay" section, was not appropriate encyclopaedic content; it fails

WP:NOTGUIDE

.

The only two references given were

WP:VRS

. I understand what you are saying - that people would use the page as reference - but it is not the duty of this encyclopaedia to help make things 'famous' - instead, we report on all subject that are already covered in other publications.

Please take the time to read the

other options for that type of content. If you wish to edit other articles, which do have independent reliable sources, then I'm sure you will enjoy Wikipedia much more. Best,  Chzz  ► 

19:33, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

I'd be happy to email you a copy of the deleted content if you wanted. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:36, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Please see the message I have posted here and review the links in it. We really need to take care of this issue once and for all. Centpacrr (talk) 19:43, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

You recently tagged the following image for deletion(File:CCVFD1251A.JPG now named File:Chaires-Capitola VFD - Air, Power & Light Trailer.jpg). If you look carefully at the name on the summary, the article that it's attached to, and all similar images, you'd realize that the this was submitted by the editor himself or herself, specifically a member of the Chaires-Capitola Volunteer Fire Department. ----DanTD (talk) 02:52, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi DanTD, Fetchy is away for a few days, so I am

OTRS permission, so I have asked the user if they can email us. Hope that sounds OK with you. Cheers,  Chzz  ► 

19:47, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Sounds pretty good. It'll sound better if the department and the uploader are recognized as one in the same. I know Fetch is offline, and I would've like to have sent this to wherever FFD pages normally go, but I didn't see a link in the banner for CSD F11 pages, so I had to sent this message wherever I could. ----DanTD (talk) 21:40, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

nominate ) 06:03, 22 July 2010 (UTC) could you help with the sxc health solutions article ? someone added the proposed deletion tag you're one of the users who did some work there. I checked over what the administrator listed as problems and wasn't sure what to do. notability seems to be established and references include some third party sources of its history which discuss it. some help would be appreciatedGrmike (talk) 06:06, 22 July 2010 (UTC)grmike The proposed deletion was removed [1], so there is no imminent danger, only the possibility of a later deletion discussion, and if that does happen, you'll have the chance to make a case...if it has decent refs, it is unlikely to happen at all.  Chzz  ►  20:45, 24 July 2010 (UTC) WP:100 :) Acather96 (talk) 09:59, 22 July 2010 (UTC) Copyright of photos How am I suppose to prove that I took a picture. The copyright is being disputed on the picture File:Squirethatisbrickandred.JPG, which I myself took and release as free domain. I'm not much involved in the wikipedia project anymore, but would like to see pictures that contribute to articles stay. Any help would be great, thanks. Gephart (talk) 22:01, 23 July 2010 (UTC) In general, you should upload free pictures at Commons, and you shouldn't have problems if you select "It is entirely my own work" and fill in the boxes. That specific picture, File:Squirethatisbrickandred.JPG, seems OK now; apparently a discussion resulted in a further 'public domain' tag being added [2] by Explicit (talk · contribs) - I'm not quite sure about the reason, so I've asked that user if they can explain further. Cheers,  Chzz  ►  20:42, 24 July 2010 (UTC) The PUF nomination is PD-Pre1978}} applies in this case because, as IronGargoyle had pointed out, the sculpture was erected before 1978 without a copyright notice. Hence, the image is licensed under the public domain. — ξxplicit 20:50, 24 July 2010 (UTC) MyEdu I think we may well have acted in different directions at exactly the same time. I have just moved talk ) 02:09, 26 July 2010 (UTC) I simply deleted the redirect as it is not currently a live article yet. —fetch·comms 02:12, 26 July 2010 (UTC) Fair enough by me. talk ) 02:14, 26 July 2010 (UTC) I meant to delete that request for move, as the page was already up and running fine. Why was it moved and deleted? And how can I get it back up and running? Wtferguson (talk) 15:26, 26 July 2010 (UTC) DYK for Morris Kessler On 26 July, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Morris Kessler, which you recently nominated. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. — Rlevse • Talk • 12:03, 26 July 2010 (UTC) Barnstar that really belongs to you The Excellent User Page Award This got dropped by my talk page...I thought I would pass it along as you were the one who actually did the work! PrincessofLlyr royal court 18:55, 27 July 2010 (UTC) Invitation for interview Hi! You are welcome to respond to questions regarding Wikinews and the Wikinews Arbitration Committee 2010 election here. This is for the Signpost's coverage of Wikinews in the Sister Projects section of the next week's issue. Thank you.--Forty twoThanks for all the fish! 01:10, 29 July 2010 (UTC) I never get interviewed... Sniff... :P ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 01:14, 29 July 2010 (UTC) Oh an interview for you could be arranged. I think MOTD deserves a WikiProject report.--Forty twoThanks for all the fish! 01:29, 29 July 2010 (UTC) Oh, that would be great. My ego needs some more inflating. :) ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 01:38, 29 July 2010 (UTC) Lol, discussion moved to Wikipedia talk:Motto of the day/Nominations/Archive 3#Community Portal--Forty twoThanks for all the fish! 01:44, 29 July 2010 (UTC) Non free files Hi Fetchcomms, I had a question about this file which is from commons and being used on Macintosh startup#Sad Mac. It's not free (a screenshot of Google Chrome) so I'm planning to tag it for speedy deletion on commons. Is there a way to port it over here? I think it's useful, and can fix up the fair use rationale. Thanks, Airplaneman ✈ 23:54, 29 July 2010 (UTC) Basically, save a copy, reupload, and name the Commons user as the author and link to the deleted page as a source. It's not ideal, when deleted, but if it's ever tagged, a Commons admin can figure it out. —fetch·comms 00:02, 30 July 2010 (UTC) Tagged on Commons (to the best of my ability) and uploaded to enwp (at mono 00:07, 30 July 2010 (UTC) Ah, OK. I was just wondering if there was a way to import and preserve the original author's upload. Thanks guys, Airplaneman ✈ 00:16, 30 July 2010 (UTC) WikiCup 2010 July newsletter We are half-way through our penultimate round, and nothing is yet certain. Pool A, currently led by WikiCup talk page . Planning has begun for the 2011 WikiCup, with open discussions concerning scoring and flags for next year's competition. Contributions to those discussions would be appreciated, especially concerning the flags, as next year's signups cannot begin until the flag issue has been resolved. Signups will hopefully open at some point in this round, with discussion about possible changing in the scoring/process opening some time afterwards. Earlier this round, we said goodbye to Fox and The ed17 22:37, 31 July 2010 (UTC) Barnstar The Modest Barnstar This Modest barnstar is awarded to Fetchcomms for copy editing articles totalling 6,393 combines words during the Guild of Copy Editors May and July 2010 backlog drive. Your contributions are appreciated!--Diannaa (Talk ) 14:55, 1 August 2010 (UTC) GOCE Backlog Elimination Drive Wrap-up Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors July 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive. Thanks to all who participated in the drive! Over 100 editors—including Jimbo Wales —signed up this time (nearly triple the participants of the May drive). This benefited the Guild as well as the articles in need of copy editing. You can see from the comparison graphs that we increased the number of completed copyedits substantially. Unfortunately, we were not able to meet our goal of completely wiping out 2008 from the queue. We also were not able to reduce the backlog to less than 6,000 articles. We suspect people were busy with real life summertime things, at least in the northern hemisphere! We were able to remove the months of January, February, March, April, and May from the backlog, and we almost wiped out the month of June. We reduced the backlog by 1,289 articles (17%), so all in all it was a very successful drive, and we will be holding another event soon. We'll come up with some new ideas to try to keep things fresh and interesting. Keep up the good work, everybody! Stats If you copy edited at least 4,000 words, you qualify for a barnstar. If you edited in the May 2010 GOCE Backlog Elimination Drive, your word totals are cumulative for barnstars (not the leaderboard). Over the course of the next week or two, we will be handing out the barnstars. Eight people will receive The Most Excellent Order of the Caretaker's Barnstar (100,000+ words): Chaosdruid, Diannaa, Ericleb01, Lfstevens, Shimeru, S Masters, The Utahraptor, and Torchiest. Bullock and Slon02 will receive The Order of the Superior Scribe (80,000+). The Barnstar of Diligence (60,000+) goes to Derild4921, GaryColemanFan, kojozone, and Mlpearc. The Modern Guild of Copy Editors Barnstar (40,000+) goes to A. Parrot, AirplanePro, Auntieruth55, Bejinhan, David Rush, and mono. Nobody will receive The Old School League of Copy Editors award (30,000+). The Tireless Contributor Barnstar (20,000+) goes to Backtable, Cindamuse, dtgriffith, Duff, e. ripley, Laurinavicius, NerdyScienceDude, and TEK. The Cleanup Barnstar (12,000+) goes to Brickie, Casliber, cymru lass, December21st2012Freak, Nolelover, TheTito, Whoosit, and YellowMonkey. The Working Man's Barnstar (8,000+) goes to Bsherr, Duchess of Bathwick, HELLKNOWZ, Mabeenot, noraft, Pyfan, and Richard asr. The Modest Barnstar (4,000+) goes to Adrian J. Hunter, Airplaneman, Annalise, Camerafiend, Cricket02, Fetchcomms, Gosox5555, LeonidasSpartan, Paulmnguyen, Piotrus, SuperHamster, Taelus, and TPW. Gold Star Award Gold Star Award Leaderboard Articles Words 5k+ Articles 1. Diannaa (248) Shimeru (200,392) Shimeru/Ericleb01 (13) 2. Slon02 (157) Diannaa (164,960) Chaosdruid (8) 3. GaryColemanFan (101) Chaosdruid (130,630) Derild4921 (7) 4. Torchiest (100) The Utahraptor (117,347) GaryColemanFan/Slon02 (6) 5. Shimeru (80) Ericleb01 (114,893) Bejinhan/The Utahraptor (5) Coordinator: ɳorɑfʈ Talk! Co-coordinators: Diannaa TALK and S Masters (talk) | Newsletter by: The Raptor You rang?/My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of The Utahraptor at 18:10, 1 August 2010 (UTC). Re:Iranian freeways Hello, Fetchcomms. You have new messages at Imzadi1979's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Editing File:The Mountain of Israeli-Palestinian Friendship.jpg It was not lacking any information. It was a very low resolution fair use image. The source was present. --Mbz1 (talk) 22:05, 1 August 2010 (UTC) There's no copyright tag. —fetch·comms 22:06, 1 August 2010 (UTC) Have you looked at the history of speedy deletions for that file? It was nominated on deletion on July 24. I voted to keep it, nobody else voted at all. So why speedy once again? It is a fair use image that is all, but impossible to get a free equivalent. --Mbz1 (talk) 22:13, 1 August 2010 (UTC) That's not the point. I didn't delete based on the FFD, I deleted based on the fact that it had no copyright tag. If you want me to undelete it so you can slap on a {{ db-f4}}. —fetch·comms 22:15, 1 August 2010 (UTC) Where should I request it?--Mbz1 (talk) 22:22, 1 August 2010 (UTC) Here? I'll do it now, sigh. —fetch·comms 22:24, 1 August 2010 (UTC) I did, but I probably did something wrong. Could you please fix it? Thanks.--Mbz1 (talk) 22:30, 1 August 2010 (UTC) I understood, and fixed it myself. Thank you.--Mbz1 (talk) 22:38, 1 August 2010 (UTC) I've done it some time ago here or I shuld do something else? Thanks.--Mbz1 (talk) 22:45, 1 August 2010 (UTC) I hope it is OK now? Thanks.--Mbz1 (talk) 22:55, 1 August 2010 (UTC) Thank you for explaining everything to me!--Mbz1 (talk) 23:00, 1 August 2010 (UTC) AfD See explanation at my talk, my mistake. Sorry. Schwyz (talk) 01:49, 2 August 2010 (UTC) GA review of Professional wrestling in New Zealand Posted. Talk · Contribs ) 04:27, 2 August 2010 (UTC) Greetings! Hello fetchcomms, for your dedication to Wikipedia and great work during your first few weeks as admin :) I make you a member of the Order of the Mop! Fetchcomms/Archive 9 has been made a member of the Order of the Mop , for their work as an admin and is entitled to display this award for being such a great admin, Kind regards and happy editing, Fridae'§Doom | Spare your time? 06:56, 2 August 2010 (UTC) Congrats! Fridae'§Doom | Spare your time? 06:56, 2 August 2010 (UTC) AfD Just to notify you, Justa Punk created an AfD here for the New Zealand Heavyweight Championship. Bejinhan talks 09:17, 2 August 2010 (UTC) New AfC barnstar I'm trying to get consensus on whether I can put this into the barnstar template, but nothing's moving at WT:WPAFC. As you commented in the discussion, could I have your opinion on my remake of the original? Cheers, sonia♫♪ 11:05, 2 August 2010 (UTC) Seems fine to me. —fetch·comms 15:14, 2 August 2010 (UTC) This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. Archive 5 ← Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 → Archive 15 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fetchcomms/Archive_9&oldid=1091507557" Toggle limited content width