Weibull distribution

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Weibull (2-parameter)
Probability density function
Probability distribution function
Cumulative distribution function
Cumulative distribution function
Parameters scale
shape
Support
PDF
CDF
Quantile
Mean
Median
Mode
Variance
Skewness
Excess kurtosis
(see text)
Entropy
MGF
CF
Kullback–Leibler divergence see below

In probability theory and statistics, the Weibull distribution /ˈwbʊl/ is a continuous probability distribution. It models a broad range of random variables, largely in the nature of a time to failure or time between events. Examples are maximum one-day rainfalls and the time a user spends on a web page.

The distribution is named after Swedish mathematician Waloddi Weibull, who described it in detail in 1939,[1] although it was first identified by René Maurice Fréchet and first applied by Rosin & Rammler (1933) to describe a particle size distribution.

Definition

Standard parameterization

The probability density function of a Weibull random variable is[2][3]

where k > 0 is the shape parameter and λ > 0 is the scale parameter of the distribution. Its complementary cumulative distribution function is a stretched exponential function. The Weibull distribution is related to a number of other probability distributions; in particular, it interpolates between the exponential distribution (k = 1) and the Rayleigh distribution (k = 2 and [4]).

If the quantity X is a "time-to-failure", the Weibull distribution gives a distribution for which the failure rate is proportional to a power of time. The shape parameter, k, is that power plus one, and so this parameter can be interpreted directly as follows:[5]

  • A value of indicates that the failure rate decreases over time (like in case of the Lindy effect, which however corresponds to Pareto distributions[6] rather than Weibull distributions). This happens if there is significant "infant mortality", or defective items failing early and the failure rate decreasing over time as the defective items are weeded out of the population. In the context of the diffusion of innovations, this means negative word of mouth: the hazard function is a monotonically decreasing function of the proportion of adopters;
  • A value of indicates that the failure rate is constant over time. This might suggest random external events are causing mortality, or failure. The Weibull distribution reduces to an exponential distribution;
  • A value of indicates that the failure rate increases with time. This happens if there is an "aging" process, or parts that are more likely to fail as time goes on. In the context of the diffusion of innovations, this means positive word of mouth: the hazard function is a monotonically increasing function of the proportion of adopters. The function is first convex, then concave with an inflection point at .

In the field of materials science, the shape parameter k of a distribution of strengths is known as the Weibull modulus. In the context of diffusion of innovations, the Weibull distribution is a "pure" imitation/rejection model.

Alternative parameterizations

First alternative

Applications in medical statistics and econometrics often adopt a different parameterization.[7][8] The shape parameter k is the same as above, while the scale parameter is . In this case, for x ≥ 0, the probability density function is

the cumulative distribution function is

the hazard function is

and the mean is

Second alternative

A second alternative parameterization can also be found.[9][10] The shape parameter k is the same as in the standard case, while the scale parameter λ is replaced with a rate parameter β = 1/λ. Then, for x ≥ 0, the probability density function is

the cumulative distribution function is

and the hazard function is

In all three parameterizations, the hazard is decreasing for k < 1, increasing for k > 1 and constant for k = 1, in which case the Weibull distribution reduces to an exponential distribution.

Properties

Density function

The form of the density function of the Weibull distribution changes drastically with the value of k. For 0 < k < 1, the density function tends to ∞ as x approaches zero from above and is strictly decreasing. For k = 1, the density function tends to 1/λ as x approaches zero from above and is strictly decreasing. For k > 1, the density function tends to zero as x approaches zero from above, increases until its mode and decreases after it. The density function has infinite negative slope at x = 0 if 0 < k < 1, infinite positive slope at x = 0 if 1 < k < 2 and null slope at x = 0 if k > 2. For k = 1 the density has a finite negative slope at x = 0. For k = 2 the density has a finite positive slope at x = 0. As k goes to infinity, the Weibull distribution converges to a

Dirac delta distribution centered at x = λ. Moreover, the skewness and coefficient of variation depend only on the shape parameter. A generalization of the Weibull distribution is the hyperbolastic distribution of type III
.

Cumulative distribution function

The cumulative distribution function for the Weibull distribution is

for x ≥ 0, and F(x; k; λ) = 0 for x < 0.

If x = λ then F(x; k; λ) = 1 − e−1 ≈ 0.632 for all values of k. Vice versa: at F(x; k; λ) = 0.632 the value of x ≈ λ.

The quantile (inverse cumulative distribution) function for the Weibull distribution is

for 0 ≤ p < 1.

The failure rate h (or hazard function) is given by

The Mean time between failures MTBF is

Moments

The

moment generating function of the logarithm of a Weibull distributed random variable is given by[11]

where Γ is the gamma function. Similarly, the characteristic function of log X is given by

In particular, the nth

raw moment
of X is given by

The mean and variance of a Weibull random variable can be expressed as

and

The skewness is given by

where , which may also be written as

where the mean is denoted by μ and the standard deviation is denoted by σ.

The excess kurtosis is given by

where . The kurtosis excess may also be written as:

Moment generating function

A variety of expressions are available for the moment generating function of X itself. As a power series, since the raw moments are already known, one has

Alternatively, one can attempt to deal directly with the integral

If the parameter k is assumed to be a rational number, expressed as k = p/q where p and q are integers, then this integral can be evaluated analytically.[12] With t replaced by −t, one finds

where G is the Meijer G-function.

The

moment generating function of 3-parameter Weibull distribution have also been derived by Muraleedharan & Soares (2014)
) by a direct approach.

Minima

Let be independent and identically distributed Weibull random variables with scale parameter and shape parameter . If the minimum of these random variables is , then the cumulative probability distribution of given by

That is, will also be Weibull distributed with scale parameter and with shape parameter .

Reparametrization tricks

Fix some . Let be nonnegative, and not all zero, and let be independent samples of , then[13]

  • .

Shannon entropy

The information entropy is given by

where is the

maximum entropy distribution for a non-negative real random variate with a fixed expected value
of xk equal to λk and a fixed expected value of ln(xk) equal to ln(λk) − .

Kullback–Leibler divergence

The Kullback–Leibler divergence between two Weibulll distributions is given by[14]

Parameter estimation

Ordinary least square using Weibull plot

Weibull plot

The fit of a Weibull distribution to data can be visually assessed using a Weibull plot.

empirical cumulative distribution function
of data on special axes in a type of Q–Q plot. The axes are versus . The reason for this change of variables is the cumulative distribution function can be linearized:

which can be seen to be in the standard form of a straight line. Therefore, if the data came from a Weibull distribution then a straight line is expected on a Weibull plot.

There are various approaches to obtaining the empirical distribution function from data: one method is to obtain the vertical coordinate for each point using where is the rank of the data point and is the number of data points.[16]

Linear regression can also be used to numerically assess goodness of fit and estimate the parameters of the Weibull distribution. The gradient informs one directly about the shape parameter and the scale parameter can also be inferred.

Method of moments

The coefficient of variation of Weibull distribution depends only on the shape parameter:[17]

Equating the sample quantities to , the moment estimate of the shape parameter can be read off either from a look up table or a graph of versus . A more accurate estimate of can be found using a root finding algorithm to solve

The moment estimate of the scale parameter can then be found using the first moment equation as

Maximum likelihood

The maximum likelihood estimator for the parameter given is[17]

The maximum likelihood estimator for is the solution for k of the following equation[18]

This equation defines only implicitly, one must generally solve for by numerical means.

When are the largest observed samples from a dataset of more than samples, then the maximum likelihood estimator for the parameter given is[18]

Also given that condition, the maximum likelihood estimator for is[citation needed]

Again, this being an implicit function, one must generally solve for by numerical means.

Applications

The Weibull distribution is used[citation needed]

distribution fitting[19]
Fitted curves for oil production time series data [20]
  • In survival analysis
  • In reliability engineering and failure analysis
  • In electrical engineering to represent overvoltage occurring in an electrical system
  • In industrial engineering to represent manufacturing and delivery times
  • In extreme value theory
  • In weather forecasting and the wind power industry to describe wind speed distributions, as the natural distribution often matches the Weibull shape[21]
  • In communications systems engineering
    • In radar systems to model the dispersion of the received signals level produced by some types of clutters
    • To model
      channel
      measurements
  • In information retrieval to model dwell times on web pages.[22]
  • In general insurance to model the size of reinsurance claims, and the cumulative development of asbestosis losses
  • In forecasting technological change (also known as the Sharif-Islam model)[23]
  • In hydrology the Weibull distribution is applied to extreme events such as annual maximum one-day rainfalls and river discharges.
  • In decline curve analysis to model oil production rate curve of shale oil wells.[20]
  • In describing the size of particles generated by grinding, milling and crushing operations, the 2-Parameter Weibull distribution is used, and in these applications it is sometimes known as the Rosin–Rammler distribution.[24] In this context it predicts fewer fine particles than the log-normal distribution and it is generally most accurate for narrow particle size distributions.[25] The interpretation of the cumulative distribution function is that is the mass fraction of particles with diameter smaller than , where is the mean particle size and is a measure of the spread of particle sizes.
  • In describing random point clouds (such as the positions of particles in an ideal gas): the probability to find the nearest-neighbor particle at a distance from a given particle is given by a Weibull distribution with and equal to the density of the particles.[26]
  • In calculating the rate of radiation-induced single event effects onboard spacecraft, a four-parameter Weibull distribution is used to fit experimentally measured device cross section probability data to a particle linear energy transfer spectrum.[27] The Weibull fit was originally used because of a belief that particle energy levels align to a statistical distribution, but this belief was later proven false[citation needed] and the Weibull fit continues to be used because of its many adjustable parameters, rather than a demonstrated physical basis.[28]

Related distributions

  • From the viewpoint of the Stable count distribution, can be regarded as Lévy's stability parameter. A Weibull distribution can be decomposed to an integral of kernel density where the kernel is either a Laplace distribution or a Rayleigh distribution :

    where is the Stable count distribution and is the Stable vol distribution.

See also

References

  1. ^ Bowers, et. al. (1997) Actuarial Mathematics, 2nd ed. Society of Actuaries.
  2. .
  3. .
  4. ^ "Rayleigh Distribution – MATLAB & Simulink – MathWorks Australia". www.mathworks.com.au.
  5. .
  6. .
  7. .
  8. .
  9. .
  10. ^ Therneau, T. (2020). "A Package for Survival Analysis in R." R package version 3.1.
  11. ^ a b c Johnson, Kotz & Balakrishnan 1994
  12. ^ See (Cheng, Tellambura & Beaulieu 2004) for the case when k is an integer, and (Sagias & Karagiannidis 2005) for the rational case.
  13. ^ Balog, Matej; Tripuraneni, Nilesh; Ghahramani, Zoubin; Weller, Adrian (2017-07-17). "Lost Relatives of the Gumbel Trick". International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR: 371–379.
  14. ].
  15. ^ "1.3.3.30. Weibull Plot". www.itl.nist.gov.
  16. ^ a b Cohen, A. Clifford (Nov 1965). "Maximum Likelihood Estimation in the Weibull Distribution Based on Complete and on Censored Samples" (PDF). Technometrics. 7 (4): 579–588.
  17. ^ a b Sornette, D. (2004). Critical Phenomena in Natural Science: Chaos, Fractals, Self-organization, and Disorder..
  18. ^ "CumFreq, Distribution fitting of probability, free software, cumulative frequency".
  19. ^ .
  20. ^ "Wind Speed Distribution Weibull – REUK.co.uk". www.reuk.co.uk.
  21. S2CID 12186028
    .
  22. .
  23. ^ Computational Optimization of Internal Combustion Engine page 49
  24. .
  25. ^ Chandrashekar, S. (1943). "Stochastic Problems in Physics and Astronomy". Reviews of Modern Physics. 15 (1): 86.
  26. ^ ECSS-E-ST-10-12C – Methods for the calculation of radiation received and its effects, and a policy for design margins (Report). European Cooperation for Space Standardization. November 15, 2008.
  27. ^ L. D. Edmonds; C. E. Barnes; L. Z. Scheick (May 2000). "8.3 Curve Fitting". An Introduction to Space Radiation Effects on Microelectronics (PDF) (Report). NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology. pp. 75–76.
  28. ^ "System evolution and reliability of systems". Sysev (Belgium). 2010-01-01.
  29. .
  30. .

Bibliography

External links