Widmanstätten pattern

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Segment of the Toluca meteorite, about 10 cm wide

Widmanstätten patterns /ˈvɪdmɑːnˌʃttɪn/ (VID-man-shtay-tin), also known as Thomson structures, are figures of long phases of nickeliron, found in the octahedrite shapes of iron meteorite crystals and some pallasites.

crystal lattice, which form at very specific angles that are determined by the lattice. In meteors, these interstitial defects can grow large enough to fill the entire crystal with needle or ribbon-like structures easily visible to the naked eye, almost entirely consuming the original lattice. They consist of a fine interleaving of kamacite and taenite bands or ribbons called lamellae. Commonly, in gaps between the lamellae, a fine-grained mixture of kamacite and taenite called plessite can be found.[1]

Widmanstätten structures describe analogous features in modern steels,[2] titanium, and zirconium alloys, but are usually microscopic in size.

Discovery

Widmanstätten pattern in the Staunton meteorite[i]

In 1808, these figures were observed by

Count Alois von Beckh Widmanstätten, the director of the Imperial Porcelain works in Vienna. While flame heating iron meteorites,[4] Widmanstätten noticed color and luster zone differentiation as the various iron alloys oxidized at different rates. He did not publish his findings, claiming them only via oral communication with his colleagues. The discovery was acknowledged by Carl von Schreibers, director of the Vienna Mineral and Zoology Cabinet, who named the structure after Widmanstätten.[5][6]
: 124  However, it is now believed that the discovery of the metal crystal pattern should be assigned to the English mineralogist William (Guglielmo) Thomson, as he published the same findings four years earlier.[7][6][8][9]

Working in Naples in 1804, Thomson treated a

Napoleonic wars
obstructed Thomson's contacts with the scientific community and his travels across Europe, in addition to his early death, obscured his contributions for many years.

Name

The most common names for these figures are Widmanstätten pattern and Widmanstätten structure; however, there are some spelling variations:

Due to the discover priority of

G. Thomson, several authors suggested to call these figures Thomson structure or Thomson-Widmanstätten structure.[6][8][9]

Lamellae formation mechanism

Phase diagram explaining how the pattern forms. First meteoric iron is exclusively composed of taenite. When cooling off it passes a phase boundary where kamacite is exsolved from taenite. Meteoric iron with less than about 6% nickel (hexahedrite) is completely changed to kamacite.
Widmanstätten pattern, metallographic polished section

crystal lattice
.

The formation of Ni-poor kamacite proceeds by diffusion of Ni in the solid alloy at temperatures between 450 and 700 °C, and can only take place during very slow cooling, about 100 to 10,000 °C/Myr, with total cooling times of 10

Myr or less.[13]
This explains why this structure cannot be reproduced in the laboratory.

The crystalline patterns become visible when the meteorites are cut, polished, and acid-etched, because taenite is more resistant to the acid.

The fine Widmanstätten pattern (lamellae width 0.3mm) of a Gibeon meteorite.

The dimension of kamacite lamellae ranges from coarsest to finest (upon their size) as the nickel content increases. This classification is called structural classification.

Usage

Since nickel-iron crystals grow to lengths of some centimeters only when the solid metal cools down at an exceptionally slow rate (over several million years), the presence of these patterns is strongly suggestive of extraterrestrial origin of the material, and can be used to indicate if a piece of iron may come from a meteorite.[citation needed]

Preparation

Canyon Diablo meteorite
showing a Widmanstätten pattern

The methods used to reveal the Widmanstätten pattern on iron meteorites vary. Most commonly, the slice is ground and polished, cleaned, etched with a chemical such as

ferric chloride, washed, and dried.[14][15]

Shape and orientation

Octahedron
Different cuts produce different Widmanstätten patterns

Cutting the meteorite along different planes affects the shape and direction of Widmanstätten figures because kamacite lamellae in octahedrites are precisely arranged. Octahedrites derive their name from the crystal structure paralleling an octahedron. Opposite faces are parallel so, although an octahedron has 8 faces, there are only 4 sets of kamacite plates. Iron and nickel-iron form crystals with an external octahedral structure only very rarely, but these orientations are still plainly detectable crystallographically without the external habit. Cutting an octahedrite meteorite along different planes (or any other material with octahedral symmetry, which is a sub-class of cubic symmetry) will result in one of these cases:

  • perpendicular cut to one of the three (cubic) axes: two sets of bands at right angles each other
  • parallel cut to one of the octahedron faces (cutting all 3 cubic axes at the same distance from the crystallographic center) : three sets of bands running at 60° angles each other
  • any other angle: four sets of bands with different angles of intersection

Structures in non-meteoritic materials

The term Widmanstätten structure is also used on non-meteoritic material to indicate a structure with a geometrical pattern resulting from the formation of a new

zirconium alloys. The Widmanstätten structures form due to the growth of new phases within the grain boundaries of the parent metals, generally increasing the hardness and brittleness of the metal. The structures form due to the precipitation of a single crystal phase into two separate phases. In this way, the Widmanstätten transformation differs from other transformations, such as a martensite or ferrite transformation. The structures form at very precise angles, which may vary depending on the arrangement of the crystal lattices. These are usually very small structures that must be viewed through a microscope because a very long cooling rate is generally needed to produce structures visible to the naked eye. However, they usually have a great and often an undesirable effect on the properties of the alloy.[16]

Widmanstätten structures tend to form within a certain temperature range, growing larger over time. In

eutectoid composition (~ 0.8% carbon). This occurs as long needles of ferrite within the pearlite.[16]

Widmanstätten structures form in many other metals as well. They will form in brass, especially if the alloy has a very high zinc content, becoming needles of zinc in the copper matrix. The needles will usually form when the brass cools from the recrystallization temperature, and will become very coarse if the brass is annealed to 1,112 °F (600 °C) for long periods.

monoclinic ɑ″ phase.[18]

However, the appearance, the composition, and the formation process of these terrestrial Widmanstätten structures are different from the characteristic structure of iron meteorites.[19]

When an iron meteorite is forged into a tool or weapon, the Widmanstätten patterns remain but become stretched and distorted. The patterns usually cannot be fully eliminated by blacksmithing, even through extensive working. When a knife or tool is forged from meteoric iron and then polished, the patterns appear on the surface of the metal, albeit distorted, but they tend to retain some of the original octahedral shapes and the appearance of thin lamellae crisscrossing each other.[19]

See also

References

  1. ^ The Staunton meteorite was found near Staunton, Virginia in the mid-19th century. Six pieces of nickel-iron were located over a period of some decades, with a total weight of 270 lb.[3]
  1. ^ Encyclopedia of the Solar System by Tilman Spohn, Doris Breuer, Torrence V. Johnson -- Elsevier 2014 Page 632
  2. ^ Dominic Phelan and Rian Dippenaar: Widmanstätten Ferrite Plate Formation in Low-Carbon Steels, METALLURGICAL AND MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS A, VOLUME 35A, DECEMBER 2004, p. 3701
  3. ^ Hoffer, F.B. (August 1974). "Meteorites of Virginia" (PDF). Virginia Minerals. 20 (3). Archived (PDF) from the original on September 18, 2021. Retrieved October 8, 2019.
  4. ^ Schreibers, Carl von (1820). Beyträge zur Geschichte und Kenntniß meteorischer Stein und Metalmassen, und Erscheinungen, welche deren Niederfall zu begleiten pflegen [Contributions to the history and knowledge of meteoric stones and metallic masses, and phenomena which usually accompany their fall] (in German). Vienna, Austria: J.G. Heubner. pp. 70–72.
  5. ^
  6. ^ Thomson, G. (1804) "Essai sur le fer malléable trouvé en Sibérie par le Prof. Pallas" (Essay on malleable iron found in Siberia by Prof. Pallas), Bibliotèque Britannique, 27 : 135–154 Archived December 15, 2019, at the Wayback Machine ; 209–229. Archived December 15, 2019, at the Wayback Machine (in French)
  7. ^
  8. ^ .
  9. ^ F. A. Paneth. The discovery and earliest reproductions of the Widmanstatten figures. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1960, 18, pp.176–182
  10. ^ Thomson, G. (1808). "Saggio di G.Thomson sul ferro malleabile trovato da Pallas in Siberia" [Essay by G. Thomson on malleable iron found by Pallas in Siberia]. Atti dell'Accademia delle Scienze di Siena (in Italian). 9: 37–57.
  11. ^ O. Richard Norton, Personal Recollections of Frederick C. Leonard Archived 2008-07-05 at the Wayback Machine, Meteorite Magazine – Part II
  12. ^ Harris, Paul; Hartman, Ron; Hartman, James (November 1, 2002). "Etching Iron Meteorites". Meteorite Times. Archived from the original on October 18, 2016. Retrieved October 14, 2016.
  13. .
  14. ^ a b c Metallography and Microstructure in Ancient and Historic Metals By David A. Scott – J. Paul Getty Trust 1991 Page 20–21
  15. ^ Meteoritic Iron, Telluric Iron and Wrought Iron in Greenland By Vagn Fabritius Buchwald, Gert Mosdal -- Kommissionen for videnskabelige Undersogelse i Gronland 1979 Page 20 on page 20
  16. Y-12 Plant, Oak Ridge National Laboratory. pp. 53–54, 65. Oak Ridge Report Y-1694. Archived
    (PDF) from the original on July 24, 2018. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
  17. ^ a b Vagn Fabritius Buchwald -- Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab (2005). Iron and Steel in Ancient Times. p. 26.