Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 May 25

< May 24	May 26 >

May 25

File:Pirkanmaa Region.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I seem to have flagged this image as a "presumed self" some time ago. When originally uploaded in 2004! it had no license and a presumed GFDL was seemingly added early in 2005. Not sure how to handle an image this old. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:08, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kenilworth Castle ruined tower.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Originally unlicensed when uploaded,"presumed GFDL" seems to have been applied around 2004, 2005 by a third party. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:10, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Simplified pulsejet1a.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A presumed self, I seem to have added "Kevin J. Rice" at some point based on the image. but there's no easy way to verify the GFDL claim independently of the image. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:15, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sheppard Line.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn by nominator Non-admin closure. Safiel (talk) 22:48, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Presumed GFDL" , GFDL license tag seemingly added by a third party. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:20, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can confirm GFDL as uploader. Radagast (talk) 00:56, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn and flagged for Commons. Thanks for the confirmation.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:17, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ivantransition.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, personal image. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:34, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Turkish theater 1933 - pishekar, kavuklu, three zenne, orchestra, on median (open space).png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. See previous discussion. — ξ ^xplicit 07:15, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Poor sourcing, Low res. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:39, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Obj shaded.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Presumed GFDL", Original upload had no license/source details. GFDL tag seems to have been added by a third party at a later date. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:41, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Confedstarburst.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Presumed GFDL"- GFDL tag seems to have been added by a third party some time in 2004, It's not clear why. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:42, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ca 1720.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Poor sourcing, Known source is 1935, but it's claimed to be from a much earlier publication. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:44, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fatehpurkiosk.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep: uploader identity resolved, assumed license still open czar 21:56, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Low res, "Presumed GFDL"- GFDL tag added by a third party, not clear why . File description states-"image by User: Markalexander100" but this is not the uploader name shown. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:46, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Markalexander100 became User:Henry Flower 15-Apr-2006. ★ Bigr Tex 18:40, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Immersion of Ganesh murti at Chowpatty Beach, Bombay.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep: uploader identity resolved, assumed license still open czar 21:56, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Presumed GFDL" - GFDL tag added by a third party, File description states " image produced by User: Markalexander100" but that's not the uploader name shown. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:48, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Markalexander100 became User:Henry Flower 15-Apr-2006. ★ Bigr Tex 19:39, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Simpsons Blockoland.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic. The setting of Blockoland is a minor detail of this episode seen only at the start; the actual plot is completely unrelated and sees Homer go on hunger strike against a baseball franchise. '''tAD''' (talk) 01:26, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:National Bank of New Zealand logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relist czar 22:01, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 July 24#File:National_Bank_of_New_Zealand_logo.svg

Non-free file currently being used in

WP:NFCCP

problems with each of these usages.

File is being used to illustrate a former logo in "Lloyds Bank". Although there is some discussion of the merger that led to this logo being replaced, the logo itself is not the subject of any sourced commentary within the relevant section so the
WP:NFCC#8
is lacking. Suggest remove from article unless the NFCC#8 issues are fixed.
File's usage in "Lloyds Associated Banking Company", "Lloyds Bank California" and "Lloyds Bank Canada" is problematic because of No. 17 of
WP:NFC#UUI. Each of these is listed as a subsidiary of Lloyds Bank and the parent entities are generally not allowed to be used in stand-alone articles about their child entities. Moreover, the source url provided for the file, www.nationalbank.co.nz/rural/information/ruralreport/pdf/200812.pdf, is not longer working and the earliest archived version of it that I could find of it (here
) does not indicate any connection to any of these three subsidiaries at all. I've tried searching for something to indicate such a connection, but have had no luck. This might be simply because all three subsidiaries have been defunct for almost 30 years. The connection between the logo and the subsidiaries is sketchy at best and very hard to verify so I suggest remove from each of the articles.

File's usage in "National Bank of New Zealand" is a bit unclear per NFCC#8 and No. 17 of NFC#UUI. According to the article, the bank was sold by Lloyd's to
ANZ Bank in 2003, which would make it a subsidiary of ANZ Bank after 2003. The article says that an agreement was reached which allowed the bank to continue to use the Lloyds logo for a period of 7 years after the sale, but this statement not supported by a reliable source. However, based upon the archived url mentioned, it appears that the bank was using the logo as late as 2008, so it seems the logo is being used as stated in its non-free use rationale. The bank is listed as going defunct in 2012, which means, if the article is accurate, that it's possible that it was possibly using another logo after it's agreement with Lloyds ran out after 7 years and before it went defunct. the most recent archived version I could find of the bank using the Lloyds logo is from October 2012. This November 2012
archived version states that the bank "has joined with ANZ". So, I'm not sure how to reconcile what these websites with the "With the purchase, ANZ also bought the right to continue to use the Black Horse logo for seven years." in the article since the logo seems to have been used for more than 7 years after ANZ bought the bank. This is the only possible article where the file's usage seems to be NFCC compliant, but I am interested in hearing what others might think.

-- Marchjuly (talk) 02:21, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I've added a source for the National Bank of New Zealand. See also, Lloyds Bank California and Lloyds Bank Canada. 2.27.75.26 (talk) 00:21, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@2.27.75.26: The file is being used in five articles. Are you suggesting "keep" for all five articles, or only certain articles. I still feel that the non-free usage of the logo does not come close to satisfying in NFCC#8 in "Lloyds Bank" and the file should be removed from that article. As for the subsidiaries, while it's true that you've helped clarify the connection between Lloyds Bank PLC and the other four, they are still described as wholly owned subsidiaries of the former in their respective articles. The book Major Companies of Europe 1993/94: Volume 2 Major Companies of the United Kingdom clearly shows this to be the case for two of the four: The National Bank of New Zealand and Lloyds Associated Banking Company (as Lloyds Merchant Bank). So, I still think the logo should probably not be used per No. 17 of NFC#UUI, but others may feel differently on this point. -- Marchjuly (talk) 15:07, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is a misinterpretation of NFC#UUI No. 17, which states: "The logo of an entity used for identification of one of its child entities, when the child entity lacks their own branding." These subsidiaries did not lack their own branding (as evidenced by the links provided above and at NBNZ), in the way that the Audit Panel, for example, lacks branding distinct from that of the London Assembly. See Report and Accounts (p. 5), Lloyds Bank Limited, 1977: "The Black Horse sign is now being progressively introduced throughout the Group as the symbol of our presence in countries across the world" and Report and Accounts (p. 13), Lloyds Bank Limited, 1978: "Our adoption of the Black Horse symbol in New Zealand has also assisted in identifying the National Bank with the Lloyds Bank Group" (both available from Companies House). As for use in the Lloyds Bank article, the logo is the subject of sourced commentary in the preceding section. 2.27.75.26 (talk) 21:40, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The source discussing the "black horse" in the previous section does not discuss this particular logo at all. I don't think there's a need for another black horse logo in addition to the one already shown in the main infobox per

WP:NFCC#8

?

As for the subsidiaries, I do think the case has probably been made for "National Bank of New Zealand", but I'm still not quite sure about the others. I have no problem, however, going along with whatever the consensus turns out to be.-- Marchjuly (talk) 23:40, 12 June 2016 (UTC); [Post edited by Marchjuly to correct spelling of "however" -- 13:33, 15 June 2016 (UTC)][reply]

As I said, I think this is a misinterpretation of NFC#UUI No. 17 for the reasons given above. I'm not clear how the case may have been made for NBNZ but not for the other subsidiaries. Why shouldn't they be treated in the same way? Should we remove the Banco Santander logo from Santander UK and other articles? What about the RBS Group logo at RBS and so on? I see that the HSBC logo is public domain under US law, but it is non-free in its home country. Should we remove that from the numerous articles in which it appears? With respect to Lloyds Bank, I have added some commentary which I hope will satisfy the requirements. 2.27.75.26 (talk) 12:30, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Trying to argue that

WP:FFDAI. As for the statement "Lloyds' iconic black horse device was retained and modified to reflect the TSB merger." you added to the the "Lloyds Bank" article, I don't see why three non-free images showing a black horse are needed to understand the meaning of that. That is just my opinion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:52, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

We are indeed discussing whether usage of the image complies with NFCC, but you have asserted that it does not and I am disputing that assertion. These were separate companies. Are you really suggesting that they should not have their logo in the infobox because it was shared with the parent? If so, I think that is a misinterpretation of NFC#UUI No. 17 and I still do not understand how the case may have been made for one but not for the other subsidiaries. In terms of the Lloyds Bank article, I do feel it helps the reader to see how the logo was modified to reflect the TSB merger (the Lloyds TSB version has not been listed here). 2.27.75.26 (talk) 20:36, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Real Housewives of New Jersey season 7 cast.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete: free use alternatives available czar 21:52, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cast photo. Contrary to the stated rationale, the image is not being used as the primary means of identification at the top of the article. Whpq (talk) 02:32, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I uploaded the picture, however, with a wrong rationale, which is now fixed. The image is a piece of promotional material that was released by a spcific company to promote their work; in this case, the television network to promote their show. Mymis (talk) 02:48, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how anything is fixed. The rationale still states it the primary means of identification at the top of the article but is is not at the top of the article. Furthermore, that purpose is already served by

WP:NFCC must be satisfied and n.a. does not address them. -- Whpq (talk) 21:32, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Apologies for my lack of knowledge of this rationale-licensing thing, never had to deal much with this during my time editing Wikipedia. I did change the rationale, could you look it up once again to see whether it makes sense now? Thank you. Mymis (talk) 21:43, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that the cast photo is being used as the primary means of identification, which is already being accomplished by the logo in the info box. Only one item of non-free content is needed for that purpose and the logo is that item. The cast photo is one item too many for that purpose and thus fails the requirement that we minimize the number of non-free items used. --Whpq (talk) 22:20, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, so how such articles like The Big Bang Theory or Parks and Recreation use both non-free logos and cast photos in the same article? What is the difference on the housewives article? Mymis (talk) 23:03, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say their use their might not be acceptable under our non-free content guidelines either, but each case requires individual review. -- Whpq (talk) 00:08, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

But

WP:NFCC#3a says "Multiple items of non-free content are not used if one item can convey equivalent significant information". It does not say that "literally one non-free image can be used". I would argue that both logo and the cast photo are of very high significance and both serve different purpose towards the recognizing and understanding the subject better. Also, The Simpsons (a featured article) has TWO cast photos in the same article. Mymis (talk) 00:56, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Are the five women pictured in the photo still alive? Why can't a freely licensed image which serves the same encyclopedic purpose be created per

WP:NFCC#8 to such a degree that removing the photo would be detrimental to the reader's understanding. The article seems to be about the entire series, not just season 7. How does using a non-free image of the cast from season 7 improve the reader's understanding of the "Overview and casting" section? -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:36, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Three of the cast members were on the show since its beginning; not sure if it's possible to find a photo showing all the cast members from all the seasons, which could be applied to most television series since the cast rarely stays the same for the whole series. I am not saying that removing the photo would make the article worthless, but do think the photo is significant towards understanding the subject better. Also, don't think that two non-free photos in one article is somehow a crime. However, as I said I am not too familiar with these Wikipedia image-related policies, and certainly not skillful enough to continue arguing by manipulating all these rules. Mymis (talk) 02:01, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct in stating that NFCC#3a does not imply only one non-free image may be used, but multiple images are not needed for identification of the show when a single image can do the job. I think this is what

WP:NFCC. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:22, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Moffitt-mansion-after.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:10, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Claimed as own work but there is a copyright watermark at the bottom right corner indicating it is copyrighted by Yenma K photography. Image is on their website. Swipe the images on the page and this photo will be part if the set. We would need OTRS confirmation that the uploader holds the copyright. Whpq (talk) 02:39, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Moffitt-mansion-before.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image is described as own work and also described as circa 1900. So unless the uploader is 116 years old and took the picture as an infant, I rather doubt the claim of own work is valid. Whpq (talk) 02:43, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Cronulla-Sutherland Sharks' logos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Remove all instances except for the current logo in the infobox ★ Bigr Tex 18:51, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free logos being used twice each in

non-free use rationale

for a single usage in the article, but no rationale for the second usage.

"File:Cronulla-Sutherland Sharks logo.svg" seems to be the current logo of the club. It is being used in the main infobox and it has a rationale for said usage, but it is also being in
WP:NFCC#3a
since the same image is being used in the main infobox and can easily be referred to using text. Suggest keep for infobox and remove from gallery.
"File:Cronulla 1988.jpg" is a former logo of the team being used in
WP:NFCC#8
will be gone as well. Not sure which of the two uses should be kept, but unless the NFCC#8 concerns are resolved to more firmly establish the context required for non-free use, I suggest remove from the article.
"File:Cronulla 1998.jpg" is being essentially used in the same manner as the 1988 logo, only in Cronulla-Sutherland Sharks#1990s and the same non-free concerns also apply. So, unless these are properly addressed, I suggest remove from the article.

-- Marchjuly (talk) 06:41, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tony-Miceli-Jazz-Vibraphonist.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Created by Tony Miceli.", No obvious connection with uploader. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:59, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as there's no indication that Miceli actually released the image. If we find out he did or something, there's
WP:OTRS. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 05:07, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:No Heels.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as

F8 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:06, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Not sure if this is above TOO, It's a simple pictogram. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:14, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I'm not sure what the nomination is trying to say. And, as this is a crop of another image, there doesn't seem to be a case to answer. Andrew D. (talk) 09:48, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
See Threshold of originality. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:01, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In the UK, ridiculously some otherwise simple pictograms are treated as above TOO. :( Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:07, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, but we're not in the UK. This is exactly the same kind of nonsense discussed at WP:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#More_out_of_control_legalism_from_Stefan2. E Eng 13:49, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There are also a few cases where quite simple pictograms have been ruled to be copyrightable in the United States. For example,

Stefan2 (talk) 16:01, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

The image should be treated as free: as a pictogram in the US, it would fall below the TOO, and the photographer has appeared to licensed the work freely (eg a derivative work of a free image could be copyrightable, but the photographer has allowed it to be freely used). --MASEM (t) 14:06, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The image is sometimes used in the United States on playgrounds with synthetic surfaces. It means that high heels will damage the play surface. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:17, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
~~Obvious delete, per~~
WP:NFCC#1. This is a non-free image. It is not licensed for use on Wikipedia. It's a photograph of raindrops on a sign. If we want to illustrate the no-heels pictogram, we need to make a vector image ourselves and release it under a compatible license. HiDrNick! 18:12, 25 May 2016 (UTC); Oops, see below. HiDrNick! 13:52, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

This is a free image as it was released by the photographer under a CC licence. HiDrNick seems to be quite mistaken. Andrew D. (talk) 21:08, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt it. Just because the photo was released, it doesn't mean the content in the first place is licensed. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:10, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew, you are absolutely right. For some reason, I thought that this photograph was only licensed for non-commercial reuse, when it has clearly been released under a compatible free license. Oops. So that just leaves us with the question "is the 'no heels' pictograph itself a 'work of authorship' that requires a 'minimal degree of creativity' to produce?", which seems like a clear 'no'. We ought to keep this image. HiDrNick! 13:52, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Masem. Carrite (talk) 22:42, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Below United States TOO.
SSTflyer 02:16, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Withdrawn - Snowballl clause. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:01, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:North Karelia.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"GFDL presumed", GFDL tag added by a third party. Uploader info added by myself in good faith. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:16, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mary Pearcey.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced, and I'm not seeng how this could be a crown work, given that Tussad's doesn't have an obvious connection. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:18, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ROBIN AMIS.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as

F1 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Credit line is " Lillian Delevoryas" , What is their connection with the uploader? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:20, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as a low-res duplicate of File:ROBIN AT 3 BARNSsmall cropped.jpg -FASTILY 08:59, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Northern Savonia.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Presumed GFDL", GFDL tag added by a third party, Uploader info added in good faith by myself. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:40, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Yak Right Side.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Low res, "Presumed GFDL", GFDL tag added by third party, Original upload had no sourcing/licensing. Uploader info added in good faith by myself. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:43, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bucksburn9.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as

F8 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete - unused street image of Bucksburn. Probably no encyclopedic use. Kelly ^hi! 10:03, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep but move to Commons, This is an example of UK street furniture, and a railed carrigeway/ seperateed service lane divider. Useful to students of highway planning. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:25, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bungeshea Avatar.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused personal image. Kelly ^hi! 10:23, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Georgeplaque.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Presumed GFDL", as in GFDL tag added by a third party, original upload had no sourcing/licensing. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:36, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NK-pyongyang2.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, Generic source (German Wiki) , Low res. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:38, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ubulake.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep czar 21:46, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"taken by User: Markalexander100", apparent Author/Uploader mismatch. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:40, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader responded , claiming they are the account holder mentioned. Is there a way to confirm a user name change? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:48, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Name change confirmed. ★ Bigr Tex 20:24, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sanjiang-streetscene-2003-08-17.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Presumed GFDL", i.e GFDL tag added by third party. uploader data added in good faith by myself later. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:48, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FoxHuntingSketch.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep czar 21:47, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone have access to the book to confirm the permission statement given? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:53, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just me, most likely. I'll double-check what I put here. Would I upload a scan of the page somewhere for confirmation? Hate these obscure references.... Elf | Talk 06:16, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've uploaded a copy of the book's copyright page, which states that all images are in the public domain, onto the image's talk page. Is this sufficient? Elf | Talk 19:24, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Although the way that page is worded, the entire book could be uploaded illustration by illustration provided it was by different uploaders for each page, which I don't think it what was intended. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:14, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mark Z. Danielewski with hat and cat.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as

F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Image is seemingly from a third party, author is credited, but the precise source isn't. (Seemingly submitted by a disclosed paid editor in connection with image subject.). Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:01, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn - Uploader added source, I've advised them to get the copyright holder to mail in the permission. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:33, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hofkirchesmall.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GFDL tag apllied by third party in 2005, Uploader data added by myself in good faith. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:36, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Elbflorenz2.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, Low res, GFDL tag applied by third party in Dec 2004, Uploder info added by myself in good faith. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:37, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tuolsleng1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GFDL tag applied by third party in 2004-2005 Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:38, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Stanleysmith99.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused file, low resolution. Kelly ^hi! 12:47, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Marionlongpainting.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image is a painting described as a painting by Marion Long. The non-free rationale claims it is being used as the primary means of identification for the Marion Long article but there is no indication this is a self portrait. The minimal use claims it is being used to identify the style of painting but there is no commentary sourced or otherwise about painting style. Whpq (talk) 13:01, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dorian fitzgerald art.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image of artwork which is not the subject of any sourced commentary in the article in which it is used. Whpq (talk) 13:06, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Reebokclassics303.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused crop of File:Reebokclassic999.JPG. Kelly ^hi! 13:08, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pat Contri.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:10, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid public domain reason. Publishing on Facebook does not constitute a public domain release. Whpq (talk) 13:08, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The36autobus.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete ★ Bigr Tex 20:29, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused file, low resolution. Kelly ^hi! 13:28, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Too small for practical use.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:04, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Syonlaneflash999.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused image, blurry. We have other images at Commons:Category:Syon Lane railway station. Kelly ^hi! 14:24, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Weetonrailway909.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused crop of File:Weeton station waiting room.JPG. Kelly ^hi! 14:28, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Shevchenko schoolchildren.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Undated, Source "Anna Zahoruk" , What is their connection with the uploader?. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:37, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Terengganuans-in-1906.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is sourced to a specific collection, and the connection with the uploader isn't clear. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:41, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Rose of Old St. Louis Cover page.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notwithstanding the book is old, this cover might not be. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:57, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Muhammad Hassan Baharly.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Poor sourcing, and it's definitely not a Wikipedia Screenshot as the license would suggest. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:09, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not that difficult to track, it's from AZ Wikipedia, where it is marked PD with poor sourcing. ★ Bigr Tex 20:35, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hole 2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete ★ Bigr Tex 20:44, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused low resolution photo. Cloudbound (talk) 19:43, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Medical images should be from exemplary sources, and good quality, this is neither.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:05, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hokkienbondtitle.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused screenshot. Cloudbound (talk) 19:50, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hoff as the Hoff.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound (talk) 19:51, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Holidays and fun 1193.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound (talk) 19:57, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Holidays1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound (talk) 20:00, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Holcim foundation 4color.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mebu83 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log

).

Unused logo. Cloudbound (talk) 20:05, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Holch.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused user graphic. Cloudbound (talk) 20:17, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Holdingflippers.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused low resolution photo. Cloudbound (talk) 20:25, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Home Cover june 08.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused graphic. Cloudbound (talk) 20:46, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Marilyn Klaus Headshot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: tagged in OTRS queue czar 21:50, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nico Malvaldi credited as the photographer, corporate name given as source, neither of which is the uploader name. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:47, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As I indicated to another Wikipedia authority (not sure whom) earlier this month, I was granted permission to upload this image by both the photographer who took it, Nico Malvaldi, and the subject of the photo/director of Ballets with a Twist, Marilyn Klaus. If I mislabeled the file or attached the wrong designation to it, please explain in detail how I may correct the issue. Thank you. --Miohcal Flork (talk) 21:14, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please read

WP:CONSENT, The copyright holder has to send in a specially worded e-mail Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:30, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Home Cover11.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused graphic. Cloudbound (talk) 21:05, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Home Cover12.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused graphic. Cloudbound (talk) 21:07, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Home Of The Philadelphia Eagles sign.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused cropped photo. Cloudbound (talk) 21:08, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Text logo?Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:06, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Home Reserve Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo. Cloudbound (talk) 21:10, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hollyfield 6th.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo. Cloudbound (talk) 21:11, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Text logo, Why not Commons?Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:06, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Honorary Guides of the Raëlian Movement.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo. Cloudbound (talk) 21:14, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Honorary Guides of the Raëlian Movement.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo. Cloudbound (talk) 21:15, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Honkay.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused user graphic. Cloudbound (talk) 21:17, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Honir.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused graphic. Cloudbound (talk) 21:18, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Honduras home.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused graphic. Cloudbound (talk) 21:21, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Surinamesvb.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

copyright violation; posted prior to upload at this page Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:24, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Homemade Christmascard.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused user graphic. Cloudbound (talk) 21:25, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bestofsuriname.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The EXIF "special instructions" consists of "FBMD" followed by a long hexadecimal number. This means that the image comes from some unidentified page on Facebook, see c:Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2016/04#Facebook images (exif/metadata). Evidence of permission is needed from the Facebook user Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:27, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Galgytotalea2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The EXIF "special instructions" consists of "FBMD" followed by a long hexadecimal number. This means that the image comes from some unidentified page on Facebook, see c:Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2016/04#Facebook images (exif/metadata). Evidence of permission is needed from the Facebook user Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:27, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Stefanorijsselmvp.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The EXIF "special instructions" consists of "FBMD" followed by a long hexadecimal number. This means that the image comes from some unidentified page on Facebook, see c:Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2016/04#Facebook images (exif/metadata). Evidence of permission is needed from the Facebook user Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:27, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Homebush Boys High School Stylised Emblem 3.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo. Cloudbound (talk) 21:27, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Text logo , Why not Commons? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:07, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Talea2015sur.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

dubious own work; user has uploaded a number of images of footballers whose metadata indicates they came from Facebook. The images uploaded by this uploader that are likely actually his own have consistent metadata indicating that they were taken by a samsung phone; this image lacks metadata. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:29, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Home222222.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused graphic. Cloudbound (talk) 21:31, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hoodie.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound (talk) 21:36, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hoover aerial.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused photo. PNG alternative of File:Hoover aerial.jpg. Cloudbound (talk) 21:39, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hoop mugshot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sketch. Cloudbound (talk) 21:40, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hooks n Crooks logo1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo. Cloudbound (talk) 21:42, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HoodMusikLogo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo. Cloudbound (talk) 21:45, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HooverContact.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused user graphic. Cloudbound (talk) 21:50, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HopeRenewed.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused user photo. Cloudbound (talk) 21:59, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hopewellsphere map HRoe 2008.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused map. Cloudbound (talk) 22:01, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be a map explaining early American cultures, so possibly useful , Why not Commons? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:09, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hopkins Solutions logo.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo. Cloudbound (talk) 22:03, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hopkinslocationandmap.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused map. Cloudbound (talk) 22:04, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete,Relevant Article uses an updated version.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:11, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HopkintonNHLoc.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused map. Cloudbound (talk) 22:06, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hornes.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo. Cloudbound (talk) 22:08, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Horror Claw.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused user graphic. Cloudbound (talk) 22:10, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Horse2 150 v2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete ★ Bigr Tex 22:13, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused low resolution photo. Cloudbound (talk) 22:11, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Too small for practical use.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:12, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Horse2 150 v3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused low resolution photo. Cloudbound (talk) 22:13, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Horse2 150.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused low resolution photo. Cloudbound (talk) 22:14, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HornerJuniorHighExSchedule.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused table graphic. Cloudbound (talk) 22:16, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CBDragon.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused free file. No foreseeable use, delete as out of scope. Safiel (talk) 22:32, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Near my island .jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused free file, no foreseeable use, delete as out of scope. Safiel (talk) 22:33, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Yen yen.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused free file, no foreseeable use, delete as out of scope. Safiel (talk) 22:35, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.