Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 348

Circumstances have changed — there are multiple quality sources about the subject and I'd like to request publishing —Sarupbanskota (talk) 21:46, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Done – as an

CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk

) 23:50, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

• Francisco Valcarcel · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions
  ]

The page was deleted without any prior notification or discussion and sources were easily found and available. —The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 13:49, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Not done The article was converted into a redirect. Check the edit history. It's all there, no edits were deleted. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:39, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

@Muboshgu: Sorry about that. I did see that but was in a haze when I created the request. In a haze. Thanks.--The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 06:18, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

• User:Oneasia2011/sandbox · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Oneasia2011 (talk) 04:48, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Oneasia2011/sandbox

I have been leaving the unfinished manuscript of the page, thinking that it would be there at all times and not face deletion, as it had been done.

I would like to continue to update the manuscript to complete it for your evaluation. Looking forward to receiving a confirmation of the un-deletion notice.

George Kunihiro Author of Oneasia2011/sandbox

Done – as an

CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk

) 16:49, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

• Draft:Sulphur Springs (TV series) · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Creator Amaury has asked me to request on his behalf that this be undeleted, but at User:Amaury/sandbox/Sulphur Springs (TV series) rather than being restored to Draft:Sulphur Springs (TV series). He wishes to continue working on this draft. Thanks. —--IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:48, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

• Userfied – the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Amaury/sandbox/Sulphur Springs (TV series). Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:56, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

• Draft:Lee Munnich · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Tzi80, request the undeletion of this

• Draft:Lee Munnich · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I am interested in updating this draft page with some new information about the subject, to submit for review. Is it possible to restore the page? Thank you! —Tzi80 (talk) 01:48, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

• Done – as a
  CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk
  ) 12:02, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

• Salah Eddin Zaimeche Al-Djazair · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This article was deleted via an expired

• Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:04, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

• Shotbow · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]
• Category:Marketing research companies by country (G6: This category is located at Category:Market research companies by country.)

Shotbow Network was Minecraft's first "network" https://shotbow.net/presskit/, making use of new technology and APIs in 2012. They were featured at the Minecon event (offical Mojang event) panel, multiple times https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iWTRfaiSG1E Similar size to Mineplex and Hypixel who both have their own Wiki articles. )} — Preceding unsigned comment added by NPCtom (talk • contribs) 10:52, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

• Done Can you find some more independent references? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:21, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

• User:Benjamin GASIGWA · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —O.G.n.T.B.D.ME 21:12, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with

administrator who carried out the deletion. If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. – Muboshgu (talk

) 23:44, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

It exists as Draft:Benjamin Gasigwa – Muboshgu (talk) 23:49, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

No longer, deleted as an advert. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:25, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Prisoner of Heaven · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Themrkiko, request the undeletion of this

• Done – as a
  CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk
  ) 11:52, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

• It is now at Draft:The Prisoner of Heaven Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:28, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

• User:Dr. Johannes Vrana/sandbox · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I was in the very beginning of drafting this article about Prof. Dr. Ripudaman Singh in my Sandbox. Ripudaman Singh is one of the most forward seeing and notable persons in Nondestructive testing and Innovation management. He started the areas of reliability and PoD within the American Society for Nondestructive Testing. He is currently leading the activities for the new area called NDE 4.0. Dr. Singh has authored 4 Books and dozens of papers. He was an invited key-note speaker at multiple conferences. Therefore, please undelete this draft of an article. It will take a couple more weeks for me to work on it and to collect all the necessary references. —Dr. Johannes Vrana (talk) 07:46, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

For a U5 speedy delete, you should consult the deleter

WP:DRV if you wish to take it further after that. Graeme Bartlett (talk

) 12:10, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with

administrator who carried out the deletion. If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. – Muboshgu (talk

) 16:10, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

• IEEE 1914.1 · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, StuartWhi, request the undeletion of this

That page isn't deleted and never has been. ‑ 

Iridescent

09:24, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

I have history merged the

Draft:IEEE 1914.1 to the article, since it appears you did not write most of it! Graeme Bartlett (talk

) 12:16, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

• Done – Muboshgu (talk) 16:11, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

• Draft:Jamia Salafia (India) · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 43.245.122.28, request the undeletion of this

Done – as a

CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk

) 16:13, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

• Draft:Abhimanika K. Yadav · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Aamertheultimate, request the undeletion of this

Done – as an

CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk

) 16:15, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

• Draft:Michael Echols · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This page is of a public official in Louisiana. We were waiting on his election in order to make the page live. Since he was elected, he now needs the page up. —Johnrodrigo1980 (talk) 16:42, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

WP:SHAREDACCOUNTS are not allowed. – Muboshgu (talk

) 16:48, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Done – as a

CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk

) 16:48, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

• Draft:Guilin North Railway Station · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions
  ]

Done – as an

CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. – Muboshgu (talk

) 19:10, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

• Hemi-laryngopharyngeal spasm · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

I am Dr. Honey's research coordinator, and I believe that the Hemi-laryngopharyngeal spasm page should be considered for undeletion. Hemi-laryngopharyngeal spasm (HeLPS) is a disease, and is not original research. Seeing as Wikipedia contains information on the majority of human diseases, I believe that HeLPS should be able to have its own page on Wikipedia. As HeLPS was recently discovered in 2016, I believe that having its own page on Wikipedia will allow the disease to gain increased widespread recognition. HeLPS is often misdiagnosed as a psychiatric condition, therefore the majority of patients with HeLPS will never have the chance to have the surgery that is available for this disease. Having a platform on Wikipedia will potentially offer help to patients suffering from HeLPS who have been misdiagnosed to find the answers that they deserve, as more patients are turning to the internet for answers. The Wikipedia page is of course not a substitute for a neurological examination. However, it may help patients to discover what it is that they are truly suffering from.

I believe that having a HeLPS page on Wikipedia allows for increased public awareness of the disease. Patients are often asking me as a research coordinator for an online source of information outlining their disease so that they themselves can have a better understanding of it. Wikipedia is an easily accessible venue for patients to reference, and it thus allows for further understanding and awareness of HeLPS and the impact that it may have on those affected. I believe that this page will be highly beneficial to those who are struggling to either find a diagnosis or to better understand their diagnosis.

For the reasons outlined above, I am requesting for the Hemi-laryngopharyngeal spasm Wikipedia page to be nominated for undeletion. —Leahpoly (talk) 21:41, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

do not do. —A little blue Bori v^_^v ^{Onward to 2020}

22:02, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

• Hugh Blumenfeld · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

There exist news sources for the subject: [1] [2] [3] [4] —grendel|khan 21:36, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

• Done @
  Draft:Hugh Blumenfeld so you can add some sources, it should have more references than the subject's website before it goes back to mainspace. Hut 8.5
  22:07, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

• Chaudry Mohammad Aslam · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Soft deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaudry Mohammad Aslam. The subject played a crucial role in defining the borders of Pakistan, he is pictured with Chairman Mao Zedong at the conclusion of the Sino Pak treaty of 1965 in the famous book Shahabnama authored by Qudrutullah Shahab, he is also pictured in the December 1951 edition of National Geographic Magazine drawing the first maps of Pakistan"Publish changes" button below —Cancerspec (talk) 21:57, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

• Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:22, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

• Barehanded · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Hugh Blumenfeld has been recreated; this article was deleted because it was (temporarily) a redlink. —grendel|khan 23:23, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

• Mr Jekyll and Dr Hyde · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Hugh Blumenfeld has been recreated; this article was deleted because it was (temporarily) a redlink. —grendel|khan 23:23, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

• Big Red (album) · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Hugh Blumenfeld has been recreated; this article was deleted because it was (temporarily) a redlink. —grendel|khan 23:23, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

• Rocket Science (Hugh Blumenfeld album) · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Hugh Blumenfeld has been recreated; this article was deleted because it was (temporarily) a redlink. —grendel|khan 23:23, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

• Please wait for the result of the deletion debate Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hugh Blumenfeld. If this passes as keep, then restoring these articles may be more justified. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:44, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

• User:Kudpung/Anti vandal centre · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

To move it to a new location to fix red links. —Wylie39 (talk) 15:05, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

• I think you should ask user:Kudpung about this file. If he agrees about its restoral and move then I am happy to do it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:34, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, no. A deletion in my user sub space stays deleted unless it is required as evidence in a serious, major issue . The community should not benefit from my work in my sub pages. Red links can be simply removed. And I note the lack of courtesy, Wylie39, in not asking me directly in the first place. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:34, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

• Draft:TechnoArt LIVE · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

My Wikipedia page does not contain any violating words and does not hurt any wiki policy and please republish it —Socialterminals (talk) 02:34, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

• Not done This venue is for pages deleted under
  WP:DRV. Thanks, --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra
  02:46, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

I see, I was looking at the userpage. See below. The page name was Draft:TechnoArt LIVE.

• Not done The draft was deleted as a violation of Wikipedia's copyright polices. Please see
  WP:DRV --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra
  02:52, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

• Draft: Atlas (video game) · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Please restore as I intend to work on this (found few sources). —

• Done --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 10:47, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

• Draft:Lifoti Magazine · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Jarish9, request the undeletion of this

• Done – as a draft that was deleted under
  article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. Graeme Bartlett (talk
  ) 12:48, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

• Draft:Parable Fifteen · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Brycebreeds, request the undeletion of this

Done – as an

CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. – Muboshgu (talk

) 20:48, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

• Todos os llamáis Mohamed · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This page was deleted because it said the content was not of "relevancia enciclopédica," but there are many Wikipedia entries (even on Wikipedia.es) about movies or short films, so would argue that this page does meet the criteria for an encyclopedia entry. To find out more information, I also tried to speak with the administrator who deleted the article and blocked me, Taty2007, but even though it says I can still edit my own user page, I am not allowed and I am also not allowed to email the administrator. I would love to be able to speak with Taty2007 and have the article reviewed since I think it contributes valuable information about the short film Todos os llamáis Mohamed. —Tpoggi (talk) 16:22, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Tpoggi, I don't know what page you're referring to. There is no record of that page existing in mainspace or draft space, and you have no deleted contributions. Is this supposed to be for the Spanish-language Wikipedia? – Muboshgu (talk) 20:50, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

MuboshguIt is on wikipedia.es. is there a different forum where I could dispute the deletion for that? the issue would be that it seems that i've been blocked from editing a page or even my own page--essentially being able to dispute the deletion. Thank you! – Tpoggi (talk) 5:57, 28 April 2020 CT

There was a page here: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Todos_os_llam%C3%A1is_Mohamed . The deleter's talk page is here es:Usuaria discusión:Taty2007. We cannot assist you on English Wikipedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:54, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

• List of attacks related to secondary schools · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I am making this request in response to the reply I got for the same article. The reply stated that there were only three revisions undone, two from me and one from another user.This is incorrect, however, There were actually dozens of revisions undone, most of them by me, but also from multiple other users. It was an article I worked on for quite a while. Originally just going through and fixing minor issues I saw, but eventually I decided to start adding entities and removing improper entries as well. The article was reverted back to the state it was right before my first revision, around a month beforehand. I think what might be happening is because I’m one of the users who’s revision’s got undone, only I can see the deleted revisions in the history. But here are links to what I see.

https://imgur.com/AfY6OmN.png

https://imgur.com/HsSHgox.png

https://imgur.com/J2eAhpL.png

https://imgur.com/mjkZy9z.png

https://imgur.com/m8rdRCm.png

https://imgur.com/jh6Xtxv.png

I’m asking for access to the highlighted version. The one which was lasted edited by Rodw. This access makes re-updating the article much easier. It’s essentially impossible to do without access. There were A LOT of changes, both large and small, which I made (most of which didn’t break the rule, but where undone in the reversion). That’s is why is extremely hard to re-update the page (property this time) without having acces a go the deleted version, —BorderRegions (talk) 23:13, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

These revisions were deleted because they mostly consisted of copyright violations. We don't restore those, especially not here. However it looks like almost all the content which was removed was added by you, so I'm very dubious about giving you access to the deleted version in case you reinstate the copyright violations. Hut 8.5 07:27, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

• Draft:Robust geometric computation · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions
  ]

G13; Google tells me this is a valid topic; e.g., [[5]] —Taku (talk) 23:25, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

• Done – as a
  CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5
  07:28, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

• Draft:Anatoly Shirshov · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions
  ]

G13; note the corresponding Wikipedia article already exists but I don’t know if there is anything that can be merged from the draft (as I don’t have an access to the draft content) —Taku (talk) 23:29, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

• Done – as a
  CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5
  07:29, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

• Draft:Computer Algebra in Scientific Computing · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions
  ]

G13; may or may not be notable (access to the content could help make the determination) —Taku (talk) 23:32, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

• Done – as a
  CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5
  07:31, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

• Tom's Organization · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I originally prodded this as failing GNG/NORG. Further review of sources shows I was wrong and the topic is notable. Please undelete and interwiki to pl:Organizacja Toma. If there are any outstanding issues (unreferenced, etc.) I'll try to fix them shortly. —_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:35, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

• Done @Piotrus: I've moved this to draft space at Draft:Tom's Organization, you said in your PROD that the cited source doesn't mention the subject so it sounds like it needs more references anyway. I'll let you decide what (if anything) to transwiki, the Polish article looks much better developed to me. Hut 8.5 07:36, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

• Draft:Interpretability of Machine Learning Models · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Cibiarjun, request the undeletion of this

• Done – as a
  CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5
  07:38, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

• Draft:Oronzo Persano · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, FabioNogarotto, request the undeletion of this

• Done – as a
  CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. this has been restored several times before, future requests may not be accepted if it doesn't get improved. Hut 8.5
  07:40, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

• Draft:Xentrifuge · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Greg.madro, request the undeletion of this

Done – as an

CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk

) 16:11, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

• Superkombat Fighting Championship · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

The article and the years 2011-2018 of this kickboxing promotion established by

Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a

Spartaz (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. – Muboshgu (talk

) 16:11, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Thank you very much! I will try with this admin, but he is not very helpful so far or maybe he was busy. If not, I will request what you say. Have a nice day! —.karellian-24 (talk) 18:27, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

• File:Toys “R” Us Canada Logo.jpeg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

PD-ineligble per File:Toys "R" Us logo.svg. Please undelete previous versions. —Jonteemil (talk) 23:35, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Is the maple leaf PD as well? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:22, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

@Graeme Bartlett: When reading the legal documents my interpretation is that Canada does not enforce copyright on the maple leaf, but they do however enforce the trademark. Therefor it is PD however the trademark issue seems to be a bit more complex.Jonteemil (talk) 12:36, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

@Jonteemil: Is there any reason you need this raster file given that File:Toys “R” Us Canada logo.svg exists? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 13:18, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

@King of Hearts: I personally don't need the file, however I never nominate superseded files with different filetypes for deletion. If you want to you may though. Until then, the previous versions should be undeleted.Jonteemil (talk) 14:53, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

@Graeme Bartlett: Also File:Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet Logo.svg and File:TikTok logo.svg.Jonteemil (talk) 16:04, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

I have unhidden the previous revisions of those two (but they were all smaller) Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:48, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

@Graeme Bartlett: Thanks. Why not on the Toys r us logo as well?Jonteemil (talk) 19:29, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

• RDH Architects · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Article seems to have been deleted in error —Elsalam01 (talk) 22:07, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

• @
  deleted as a result. Hut 8.5
  22:17, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
• Not done – Muboshgu (talk) 19:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

• Bahman Ansari · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Hello

I created a page for Iranian writer, poet and researcher Bahman Ansari. He is an Iranian postmodernist writer. He has more than 15 books and scientific papers.

You can see the link to see a list of some of his books: GoodReads.com

in ResearchGate: ResearchGate

And to see one of his books on Google Books: Google Books

or Persian website like: دانلود کتاب

Searching for his name in Persian: بهمن انصاری , you can see many photos and books of him.

I created this page to appreciate this Iranian author and to acquaint non-Iranians with him. I first referred the article I wrote to Iranian news agencies. But the article was deleted. I wrote this article for the second time and this time I referred it to reputable sites like English Goodreads and Persian Goodreads, but again my article was deleted.

Please retrieve the article and if there is a problem in referring to the resources, please guide me to solve them.

Thank you B.sooshiant (talk) 20:17, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

• Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a
  administrator who closed the discussion, MBisanz (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. – Muboshgu (talk
  ) 20:35, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

• Draft:Kőszeghy Károly · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) KoszeghyLea (talk) 20:39, 29 April 2020 (UTC) Draft:Kőszeghy Károly

Done – as an

CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. – Muboshgu (talk

) 20:40, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

• Chữ khoa đẩu · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

"Chữ khoa đẩu" version by Xuyền is certainly a hoax, but this hoax is still circulating among many Vietnamese fundamentalist nationalists. This is exactly why there should be an article about it, including the arguments refuting it, in the first place. Beside that, there are some other speculations, though still debatable, about what chữ khoa đẩu mentioned in ancient documents really was. We just do not delete an article about a hoax just because that is a hoax. Greenknight dv (talk) 05:33, 30 April 2020 (UTC) —Greenknight dv (talk) 05:33, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

• Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:22, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

• Draft:Austrian Business Aviation Association · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Cuba98, request the undeletion of this

• Draft:Austrian Business Aviation Association · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

As the article exists in German language and the content is accurate I expect future publications to prove the validity of content —Cuba98 (talk) 06:43, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

• Done – as a
  CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk
  ) 13:23, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

• Page name goes here · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Atarian 13:14, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

I should not be punished for kindnness and wanting to meet new people and make new friends

If you are talking about User:D Rhindle, then we won't be restoring the call to join a club. Instead, based on your noble aspiration, you should be improving and writing some Wikipedia articles. Also I note that your signature does not match your user name, so you were harder to track down! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:31, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

• Draft:Template:LaptopScreen · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions
  ]

Also, if you cam move this draft page to my personal namespace, can you create only the User:ThisIsNotABetter/Template:LaptopScreen page with these content? ThisIsNotABetter (talk) 00:02, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

• Userfied – the page has been restored to the userspace at User:ThisIsNotABetter/Template:LaptopScreen. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:18, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Thanks! ThisIsNotABetter (talk) 13:57, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

• Hoaxed · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

As noted in the the deletion discussion, this page was essentially a mainspace copy-and-paste from a currently rejected draft at Draft:Hoaxed (2019 Film). I'm requesting undeletion and a history merge with Draft:Hoaxed (2019 Film) so that subsequent work isn't lost, in the hopes that more reliable sources can be found as the film ages. —Netoholic @ 12:42, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a

Spartaz (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. – Muboshgu (talk

) 16:11, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

@

WP:REFUND above which specifically says that this page can be used for this - This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied, restored as a draft... This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you. The only slight complication is that I'm asking for a history merge because the draft was clearly the source for the mainspace page, and there were improvements made to it in its time there. -- Netoholic @

20:40, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

 Done

Spartaz ^Humbug!

05:00, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Netoholic, I was just coming back to as Spartaz if he'd do it. I'm no good at the history merges. Glad to see it's done. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:25, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

• Robin Christopher · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Christopher's page was deleted by a prod nomination because there were no refs other than an IMDB link. The article should be restored because she meets

Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:26, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

• Draft:Terissa Kelton · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 76.89.243.88, request the undeletion of this

• Draft:Terissa Kelton · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Their work as a producer is continually growing and more references are becoming available soon. —76.89.243.88 (talk) 19:42, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Done – as an

CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk

) 20:22, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

• The Kashmir Walla · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

The article was deleted without a reason, considering it has proper verifiable sources from many media sources and more are available to be added. The article is about a legitimate, functioning, publication, widely appeared and quoted in media, including VICE, Al Jazeera, Ozy and prominently by Columbia Journalism Review also. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2020‎ 2405:201:5400:8f9c:b189:1863:ce15:1ef7 (talk) 21:22, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

@Barkeep49:, you closed this as a soft delete, with a nominator and a concurrence. I thought soft deletes were where nobody else commented? – Muboshgu (talk) 21:29, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Done Barkeep49 (talk) 21:30, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

@Muboshgu: we edit conflicted. I am pretty comfortable using SOFTDELETE to close AfDs rather than relisting but consider a nom + 1 vote to be equivalent, in most circumstances, to a PROD + endorsed PROD. So I will in those circumstances generally close as SOFTDELETE. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 21:34, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Barkeep49, thanks for that explanation. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:17, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

• Draft:Richard_J._Eden · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions
  ]

Editing of this page was delayed beyond six months. We are now ready to resume editing it. —82.69.57.245 (talk) 23:17, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Done – as a draft that was deleted under

article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. – Muboshgu (talk

) 23:19, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

• talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions
  ]

Draft:Galaxy Nostalgia Network

     > Hello! The revised versions of this article were deleted for copyright    violations. This was entirely correct, and I’m legitimately sorry for any trouble which I caused. It was not my intention, and I definitely should have realized my mistake. 

      > There was a lot of legitimatly good content added to the page in the last month. But sadly they were all lost (even the ones which didn't violate anything), because of the restoration that was needed. I’m 100% willing to add everything again, and this time properly done, with everything reworded. But it makes it impossible to do without being able to actually see the differences.