Animalism (philosophy)
This article is missing information about the philosophical theory of animalism.(July 2018) |
Part of a series on |
Philosophy |
---|
In the philosophical subdiscipline of ontology, animalism is a theory of personal identity that asserts that humans are animals.[1] The concept of animalism is advocated by philosophers Eric T. Olson, Peter van Inwagen, Paul Snowdon, Stephan Blatti, David Hershenov and David Wiggins.[2][page needed] The view stands in contrast to positions such as John Locke's psychological criterion for personal identity or various forms of mind–body dualism, such as Richard Swinburne's account.
Thinking-animal argument
A common argument for animalism is known as the thinking-animal argument. It asserts the following:[3]
- A person that occupies a given space also has a Homo sapiens animal occupying the same space.
- The Homo sapiens animal is thinking.
- The person occupying the space is thinking.
- Therefore, a human person is also a human animal.
Use of term in ethics
A less common, but perhaps increasing, use of the term animalism is to refer to the ethical view that all or most animals are worthy of moral consideration.
References
Footnotes
- ^ Olson 2007, sec. 2.1.
- ^ Blatti & Snowdon 2016; Garrett 1998; Snowdon 2017.
- ^ Olson, Eric (2003). "An Argument for Animalism" (PDF). Personal Identity: 318–34.
- ^ The Animalist. "What Is Animalism?". Medium. Retrieved 29 March 2019.
Bibliography
- Blatti, Stephan; Snowdon, Paul, eds. (2016). Animalism: New Essays on Persons, Animals, & Identity. Oxford University Press.
- Garrett, Brian (1998). Personal Identity and Self-Consciousness. London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-16573-0.
- Olson, Eric T. (2007). What Are We? A Study in Personal Ontology. Oxford University Press.
- Snowdon, Paul (2017). Persons, Animals, Ourselves. Oxford University Press.
Further reading
- ISBN 978-0-511-75934-5.
- Blatti, Stephan (2020). "Animalism". In ISSN 1095-5054. Retrieved 30 November 2020.