Battle of Andrassos
Battle of Andrassos | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Part of the Arab–Byzantine wars | |||||||
Depiction of the flight of Sayf al-Dawla from the Madrid Skylitzes | |||||||
| |||||||
Belligerents | |||||||
Byzantine Empire |
Emirate of Aleppo | ||||||
Commanders and leaders | |||||||
Leo Phokas the Younger Constantine Maleinos | Sayf al-Dawla | ||||||
Strength | |||||||
Unknown, but considerably fewer | variously from 3,000 to 30,000 | ||||||
Casualties and losses | |||||||
Light | Very heavy; reportedly only 300 cavalrymen escaped |
The Battle of Andrassos or Adrassos was fought on 8 November 960 between the
Sayf al-Dawla had established an emirate based in
In mid-960, taking advantage of the absence of much of the Byzantine army on campaign against the Emirate of Crete, the Hamdanid prince launched another invasion of Asia Minor, and raided deeply and widely into the region of Cappadocia. On his return, however, his army was ambushed by Leo Phokas at the pass of Andrassos. Sayf al-Dawla himself barely escaped, but his army was annihilated.
Following a series of Byzantine successes in the previous years, the battle of Andrassos is considered by many scholars to have finally broken the power of the Hamdanid emirate. Having lost much of his strength, and increasingly beset by illness, Sayf al-Dawla would never again be able to raid as deeply into Byzantine territories. Led by Leo's brother
Background
In the middle of the 10th century, after a period of expansion on its eastern frontier, led by
After his establishment in Aleppo, in winter 945–946 Sayf al-Dawla launched his first raid into Byzantine territory, but a truce was arranged and regular warfare between Sayf al-Dawla and the Byzantines began only in 948.
Sayf al-Dawla nevertheless rejected offers of peace from the Byzantines, and continued his raids. More importantly, he set about restoring the frontier fortresses of Cilicia and northern Syria, including at Marash and Hadath. Bardas Phokas repeatedly tried to hinder him, but was defeated each time, even losing his youngest son,
Sayf al-Dawla's invasion of Cappadocia
In early summer 960, Sayf al-Dawla saw an opportunity to reverse his recent setbacks and re-establish his position: the best troops of the Byzantine army, and Nikephoros Phokas himself, departed the eastern front for an
The task of confronting the Hamdanid emir fell on Leo Phokas, who according to the Byzantine chroniclers had been appointed as Domestic of the Schools of the West (i.e., of the European armies) following the accession of
At the head of a strong cavalry force—the numbers reported in the sources vary from 3,000 to as many as 30,000[20][21]—Sayf al-Dawla invaded Byzantine territory, and advanced unopposed as far as the fortress of Charsianon, capital of the theme of the same name. There he and his army sacked the fortress and massacred the garrison; they pillaged and torched the surrounding region and its settlements and took many prisoners.[22] Other than Charsianon, the invasion appears to have avoided fortified centres and cities. According to the historian William Garrood, this fact, along with the great depth of penetration, and the long duration of the raid, points to it being "a grand campaign of destabilisation of the border" rather than an expedition with specific targets in mind. Indeed, Garrood opines that after Charsianon, Sayf al-Dawla appears to have turned to the west in order to maximize the area devastated during the raid.[16]
Towards the end of autumn, Sayf al-Dawla finally began the journey home, taking his booty and prisoners with him. The contemporary Byzantine historian Leo the Deacon gives a vivid portrait of the Hamdanid prince, who, elated at the success of his raid and full of self-confidence, sped back and forth alongside his troops on his horse, a mare "of extraordinary size and speed", throwing his spear in the air and catching it again with remarkable dexterity.[23][24]
Ambush at Andrassos
In the meantime Leo Phokas, heavily outnumbered by the Arab army, decided to rely once more on his proven ambuscade tactics, and occupied a position in the Arabs' rear, awaiting their return.[25][26] Leo had been joined by the remaining forces of the adjoining provinces, including the theme of Cappadocia under its strategos, Constantine Maleinos, and occupied the narrow pass of Kylindros[a] on the south-western Taurus Mountains between Cilicia and Cappadocia. The Byzantine troops occupied the local fort, and hid themselves along the steep sides of the pass.[29][33][34] According to the Arab chronicler Abu'l-Fida, this was the same pass that Sayf al-Dawla had crossed to begin his expedition, and many of his commanders advised against using it for the return as well; the Tarsiots even recommended that he should follow them on their own, different return route. Nevertheless, the Hamdanid prince, confident of his ability and judgment, had grown haughty, and refused to heed any advice, seeking to reap the glory for this expedition alone.[31][35] The Tarsiots withdrew, and thus were preserved from the subsequent disaster.[36]
On 8 November 960, the Hamdanid army entered the pass, where, according to Leo the Deacon, they "had to crowd together in the very narrow and rough places, breaking their formations, and had to cross the steep section each one as best he could". Once the entire Arab force, including their train and their captives, was in the pass, with the vanguard already nearing the southern exit, Leo Phokas gave the signal for the attack. With the trumpets blaring, the Byzantine soldiers raised cries and charged the Arab columns, or threw rocks and tree trunks down the slopes on them. The ensuing battle was a complete rout. Many Arabs were killed—Leo the Deacon claims that their bones were still visible at the site years later—and even more were taken captive—John Skylitzes writes that so many prisoners were taken that the cities and farmsteads were filled with slaves. All the Christian captives were liberated and the booty recovered, while the treasure and baggage of Sayf al-Dawla himself were captured.[35][37][38] The Hamdanid prince himself barely managed to escape; Theophanes Continuatus claims that he was saved when a Byzantine renegade named John gave him his own horse to escape,[39] while Leo the Deacon reports that he threw gold and silver coins behind him to slow his pursuers.[40]
According to the 13th-century Syriac chronicler Bar Hebraeus, of the great expedition he had mustered, Sayf al-Dawla returned to Aleppo with only 300 horsemen.[41][42] Several of the most distinguished Hamdanid leaders fell or were captured at this battle. Some Arab sources mention the capture of Sayf al-Dawla's cousins Abu'l-Asha'ir and Abu Firas al-Hamdani, but most chroniclers and modern scholars place these events on different occasions (in 956 for Abu'l-Asha'ir, and 962 for Abu Firas).[43][44] His nephew Muhammad, son of Nasir al-Dawla, was captured,[16] while the qadi of Aleppo, Abu'l-Husayn al-Raqqi, was taken prisoner or fell in battle according to different accounts. Bar Hebraeus also records the deaths of the commanders "Hamid ibn Namus" and "Musa-Saya Khan".[42][45]
Leo Phokas released the Byzantine prisoners after providing them with provisions, and took the booty and Arab prisoners back to Constantinople, where he celebrated a triumph at the Hippodrome.[46][47] Indeed, the battle of Andrassos made a deep impression among contemporaries, provoking outbursts of celebration in the Empire, and grief and lamentation in the Syrian cities; it is mentioned by all historical sources of the time, and upheld in the contemporary Byzantine treatise De velitatione bellica ("On Skirmishing Warfare") as one of the chief examples of a successful ambush.[48]
Aftermath
Both contemporary Arab and modern historians, such as Marius Canard and J. B. Bikhazi, have commonly considered the defeat at Andrassos as a decisive engagement that destroyed Hamdanid offensive abilities for good, and opened the path for Nikephoros Phokas' subsequent exploits. The disasters inflicted on Sayf al-Dawla by the Byzantines over the following years are regarded as an inevitable consequence of this battle.[49][50][51] Garrood on the other hand argues that the Hamdanid ruler had been able to recover from similar failures on previous occasions, and that the forces of Naja and his Tarsiot allies remained intact; furthermore, unlike the disasters that followed, his personal authority does not appear to have been challenged in the aftermath of the battle.[52]
Nevertheless, Sayf al-Dawla's 960 raid was the last of this scale and ambition,
The defeats of the previous years, and particularly the sack of Aleppo, had dealt an irreversible blow on Sayf al-Dawla's power and authority. From then on, until his death, Sayf al-Dawla's rule would be plagued by revolts and disputes between his subordinates.
In autumn 964, Nikephoros, now emperor, campaigned in the east. Mopsuestia was besieged but held out. Nikephoros returned in the next year, stormed the city and deported its inhabitants. On 16 August 965, Tarsus was surrendered by its inhabitants. Cilicia became a Byzantine province, and Nikephoros re-Christianized it.[53][59][60] Amidst rebellions and Byzantine raids as far as the Jazira, Sayf al-Dawla died at Aleppo in February 967.[61][62][63]
His son and successor,
Footnotes
- ^ Kukusos to Mopsuestia".[33]
References
- ^ Treadgold 1997, pp. 479–484.
- ^ Bianquis 1997, p. 105.
- ^ Bianquis 1997, pp. 106–107.
- ^ Schlumberger 1890, pp. 119–121.
- ^ a b Schlumberger 1890, p. 132.
- ^ a b c d e Bianquis 1997, p. 107.
- ^ Whittow 1996, pp. 322–323.
- ^ Treadgold 1997, pp. 487, 489.
- ^ a b Treadgold 1997, p. 489.
- ^ Schlumberger 1890, pp. 132–133.
- ^ Schlumberger 1890, pp. 133–134.
- ^ Treadgold 1997, p. 492.
- ^ Schlumberger 1890, pp. 134–136.
- ^ Treadgold 1997, pp. 492–493.
- ^ Schlumberger 1890, p. 136.
- ^ a b c d Garrood 2008, p. 131.
- ^ Treadgold 1997, pp. 494–495.
- ^ Talbot & Sullivan 2005, pp. 70–72.
- ^ a b Prosopographie der mittelbyz. Zeit, Leon Phokas (#24423).
- ^ Schlumberger 1890, p. 139.
- ^ Treadgold 1997, p. 495.
- ^ Schlumberger 1890, pp. 139–140.
- ^ Talbot & Sullivan 2005, p. 74.
- ^ Schlumberger 1890, p. 140.
- ^ Talbot & Sullivan 2005, pp. 72–74.
- ^ Stouraitis 2003, Chapter 2, esp. note 2.
- ^ Honigmann 1935, pp. 85–86.
- ^ Hild & Restle 1981, p. 218.
- ^ a b Schlumberger 1890, p. 142.
- ^ Hild & Hellenkemper 1990, p. 159.
- ^ a b c Honigmann 1935, p. 86.
- ^ Markopoulos 1979, p. 112.
- ^ a b Hild & Restle 1981, pp. 90, 218–219.
- ^ Stouraitis 2003, Chapter 2.
- ^ a b Schlumberger 1890, pp. 142–143.
- ^ Garrood 2008, pp. 131–132.
- ^ Talbot & Sullivan 2005, pp. 74–75.
- ^ Wortley 2010, p. 241.
- ^ Prosopographie der mittelbyz. Zeit, Ioannes (#23093).
- ^ Talbot & Sullivan 2005, p. 75.
- ^ Schlumberger 1890, p. 143.
- ^ a b Wallis Budge 1932, p. 184.
- ^ Schlumberger 1890, pp. 143–144.
- ^ Prosopographie der mittelbyz. Zeit, Abū Firās al-Ḥāriṯ b. Saʻīd b. Ḥamdān (#20051); Abū l-‘Ašā’ir (#20040).
- ^ Schlumberger 1890, p. 144.
- ^ Talbot & Sullivan 2005, pp. 75–76.
- ^ Schlumberger 1890, p. 146.
- ^ Schlumberger 1890, pp. 144–145.
- ^ Garrood 2008, pp. 132, 134.
- ^ Stouraitis 2003, Chapter 3.
- ^ Hild & Restle 1981, p. 90.
- ^ a b Garrood 2008, p. 132.
- ^ a b Bianquis 1997, p. 108.
- ^ a b Treadgold 1997, pp. 495–497.
- ^ Garrood 2008, pp. 132–134.
- ^ Treadgold 1997, pp. 498–499.
- ^ Garrood 2008, pp. 134–135.
- ^ Kennedy 2004, p. 279.
- ^ Treadgold 1997, pp. 499–501.
- ^ Garrood 2008, pp. 135–138.
- ^ Bianquis 1997, pp. 108–109.
- ^ Treadgold 1997, pp. 501–502.
- ^ Kennedy 2004, pp. 279–280.
- ^ Kennedy 2004, p. 280.
- ^ Honigmann 1935, p. 94.
- ^ Treadgold 1997, pp. 504–505.
- ^ Honigmann 1935, pp. 94–97.
- ^ Treadgold 1997, p. 507.
- ^ Kennedy 2004, pp. 280–282.
Sources
- ISBN 978-90-04-10422-8.
- Garrood, William (2008). "The Byzantine Conquest of Cilicia and the Hamdanids of Aleppo, 959–965". Anatolian Studies. 58: 127–140. S2CID 162596738.
- Hild, Friedrich; Restle, Marcell (1981). Tabula Imperii Byzantini, Band 2: Kappadokien (Kappadokia, Charsianon, Sebasteia und Lykandos) (in German). Vienna: ISBN 978-3-7001-0401-8.
- Hild, Friedrich; Hellenkemper, Hansgerd (1990). Tabula Imperii Byzantini, Band 5: Kilikien und Isaurien (in German). Vienna: ISBN 978-3-7001-1811-4.
- Honigmann, E. (1935). Byzance et les Arabes, Tome III: Die Ostgrenze des Byzantinischen Reiches von 363 bis 1071 nach griechischen, arabischen, syrischen und armenischen Quellen (in German). Brussels: Éditions de l'Institut de Philologie et d'Histoire Orientales.
- ISBN 978-0-582-40525-7.
- Lilie, Ralph-Johannes; Ludwig, Claudia; Pratsch, Thomas; Zielke, Beate (2013). Prosopographie der mittelbyzantinischen Zeit Online. Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Nach Vorarbeiten F. Winkelmanns erstellt (in German). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter.
- Markopoulos, A. (1979). "Le témoignage du Vaticanus gr. 163 pour la période entre 945–963". Byzantina Symmeikta (in French). 3: 83–119. ISSN 1105-1639.
- Schlumberger, Gustave (1890). Un empereur byzantin au dixième siècle, Nicéphore Phocas (in French). Paris: Librairie de Firmin-Didot et Cie.
- Stouraitis, Ioannis (2003). "Battle at the Straights of Andrasus, 960". Encyclopedia of the Hellenic World. Foundation of the Hellenic World. Archived from the original on 19 January 2019. Retrieved 15 November 2016.
- ISBN 978-0-88402-324-1.
- ISBN 0-8047-2630-2.
- Wallis Budge, Ernest A., ed. (1932). Bar Hebraeus' Chronography: Translated from Syriac. London: Oxford University Press. Archived from the original on 22 June 2012.
- ISBN 978-0-520-20496-6.
- Wortley, John, ed. (2010). John Skylitzes: A Synopsis of Byzantine History, 811–1057. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-76705-7.