Constance of Antioch
Constance | |
---|---|
Bohemond III | |
Alongside | Raymond (1136–1149) Raynald (1153–1160 or 1161) |
Regents | See list
|
Born | 1128 |
Died | 1163 (aged 34–35) |
Spouse | Catholicism |
Constance of Hauteville (1128–1163) was the ruling
Constance was given in marriage to
After her second husband fell into captivity around 1160–1161, Constance wanted to rule Antioch alone, but Baldwin III of Jerusalem declared her fifteen-year-old son,
Early life
Born in 1128, Constance was the only child of Prince
The Antiochene noblemen sent envoys to Baldwin II, urging him to come to the principality,
Reign
Childhood
The Antiochene noblemen acknowledged Baldwin II as regent, swearing fealty to him and Constance.
Alice again laid claim to the regency.
Fulk returned to Antioch when Zengi dispatched Sawar, governor of Aleppo, to invade the principality in 1132 or 1133.[18] After defeating the invaders, Fulk entered Antioch.[19] Since the principality needed a firm government, the Antiochene noblemen approached Fulk to select a husband for Constance.[20] He chose Raymond of Poitiers, the younger son of William IX, Duke of Aquitaine.[20][21] He did not announce his decision in public because he wanted to prevent Alice and Roger II of Sicily from intervening.[21]
Alice's sister,
First marriage
Raymond of Poitiers arrived at Antioch in April 1136.
In early 1147 Roger II of Sicily extended an offer to
Widowhood
Raymond was killed in the
Baldwin III returned to Antioch in summer 1150.
Historian Steven Runciman says that Constance may have refused the candidates proposed by Baldwin III and Manuel I because she had met Raynald of Châtillon, a knight from France.[39] Even though William of Tyre described Raynald as a "knight of common sort", Constance decided to marry Raynald.[40] Their betrothal was kept secret because Constance wanted to obtain Baldwin III's permission for the marriage.[41]
Second marriage
After Baldwin sanctioned the marriage, Constance and Raynald married in early 1153.[41] Raynald took charge of the administration of the principality.[39] However, he was unpopular because his subjects regarded him as an upstart.[39] His frequent attempts to raise funds brought him into conflict with Patriarch Aimery and Emperor Manuel I during the subsequent years.[41] The emperor forced Raynald to pay homage to him in the spring of 1159.[42] Raynald was captured and imprisoned by Majd al-Din, governor of Aleppo, during a plundering raid in November 1160 or 1161.[40][43]
After her husband fell into captivity, Constance announced her intention to administer the principality, but most Antiochene noblemen preferred a male ruler.[44] Baldwin III of Jerusalem hurried to Antioch and declared Constance's fifteen-year-old son, Bohemond III, the lawful prince, charging Patriarch Aimery with the administration of the principality.[44][45] Constance did not accept Baldwin's decision and protested against it to Emperor Manuel.[46]
Manuel dispatched his nephew, Alexios Bryennios Komnenos, and John Kamateros to Antioch to begin negotiations about his marriage to Constance's daughter, Maria.[47] The marriage contract was signed and the emperor's delegates confirmed Constance's position as the ruler of the principality.[47] Baldwin III, who came to Antioch to meet the imperial envoys, did not protest.[47]
Constance's son, Bohemond, reached the age of majority in 1163.
Family
Constance's first husband,
Whether the father of Constance's second son, Baldwin, was Raymond of Poitiers or Raynald of Châtillon cannot be determined with certainty.
Constance's close family and relationship with the rulers of Sicily and the Crusader states[64] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
References
- ^ Hodgson 2007, p. 182.
- ^ Runciman 1989, p. 176.
- ^ Murray 2016, pp. 81, 83.
- ^ Murray 2016, p. 84.
- ^ a b c d Nicholson 1969, p. 431.
- ^ Murray 2016, p. 81.
- ^ a b c d e f Runciman 1989, p. 183.
- ^ a b Norwich 1992, p. 473.
- ^ Murray 2016, p. 85.
- ^ Buck 2017, p. 221.
- ^ a b c Runciman 1989, p. 184.
- ^ Runciman 1989, p. 185.
- ^ Barber 2012, p. 152.
- ^ a b c Runciman 1989, p. 188.
- ^ a b c d Nicholson 1969, p. 433.
- ^ Runciman 1989, pp. 188, 190.
- ^ a b Runciman 1989, p. 190.
- ^ Runciman 1989, p. 195.
- ^ a b c Runciman 1989, p. 198.
- ^ a b Nicholson 1969, p. 434.
- ^ a b Barber 2012, p. 153.
- ^ a b Runciman 1989, p. 199.
- ^ Runciman 1989, pp. 199–200.
- ^ a b Runciman 1989, p. 200.
- ^ Norwich 1992, pp. 484–486.
- ^ Norwich 1992, p. 486.
- ^ a b Runciman 1989, p. 278.
- ^ Barber 2012, p. 188.
- ^ Baldwin 1969, pp. 532–533.
- ^ Hodgson 2007, pp. 182–183.
- ^ a b c d Baldwin 1969, p. 533.
- ^ Runciman 1989, pp. 330–331.
- ^ a b c Runciman 1989, p. 331.
- ^ a b Runciman 1989, p. 333.
- ^ Hodgson 2007, p. 187.
- ^ a b c Barber 2012, p. 208.
- ^ Runciman 1989, p. 331 (note 1).
- ^ a b Runciman 1989, p. 332.
- ^ a b c Runciman 1989, p. 345.
- ^ a b Barber 2012, p. 206.
- ^ a b c Baldwin 1969, p. 540.
- ^ Baldwin 1969, pp. 543–544.
- ^ Runciman 1989, p. 357.
- ^ a b Runciman 1989, p. 358.
- ^ a b c Barber 2012, p. 215.
- ^ Runciman 1989, p. 359.
- ^ a b c Runciman 1989, p. 360.
- ^ Baldwin 1969, p. 547.
- ^ Runciman 1989, p. 364.
- ^ Runciman 1989, pp. 364–365.
- ^ Runciman 1989, p. 365 (note 1).
- ^ Meade 1991, pp. 8, 22.
- ^ Dunbabin 2000, p. 384.
- ^ Meade 1991, pp. 18, 22.
- ^ Runciman 1989, p. 330.
- ^ a b Hodgson 2007, p. 183.
- ^ Garland 1999, p. 201.
- ^ Runciman 1989, p. 378.
- ^ Hamilton 2000, pp. xviii, 40–41.
- ^ Runciman 1989, p. 365, Appendix III (Genealogical tree No. 2.).
- ^ Runciman 1989, p. 413.
- ^ Runciman 1989, p. 365 (note 2).
- ^ Chiappini 2001, p. 31.
- ^ Runciman 1989, Appendix III.
Sources
- Baldwin, Marsall W. (1969) [1955]. "The Latin States under Baldwin III and Amalric I, 1143–1174". In ISBN 0-299-04834-9.
- ISBN 978-0-300-11312-9.
- Buck, Andrew D. (2017). The Principality of Antioch and its Frontiers in the Twelfth Century. The Boydell Press. ISBN 978-1-78327-173-3.
- Chiappini, Luciano (2001). Gli Estensi: Mille anni di storia [The Este: A Thousand Years of History] (in Italian). Corbo Editore. ISBN 88-8269-029-6.
- ISBN 0-19-820846-4.
- Garland, Lynda (1999). Byzantine Empresses: Women and Power in Byzantium, AD 527–1204. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-61944-8.
- Hamilton, Bernard (2000). The Leper King and His Heirs: Baldwin IV and the Crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-64187-6.
- Hodgson, Natasha R. (2007). Woman, Crusading and the Holy Land in Historical Narrative. The Boydell Press. ISBN 978-1-84383-332-1.
- ISBN 0-14-015338-1.
- Murray, Alan W. (2016). "Constance, Princess of Antioch (1130–1164), ancestry, marriages and family". In van Houts, Elisabeth (ed.). Anglo–Norman Studies: XXXVIII. Proceedings of the Battle Conference 2015. The Boydell Press. pp. 81–95. ISBN 978-1-78327-101-6.
- Nicholson, Robet L. (1969). "The Growth of the Latin States, 1118–1144". In Setton, Kenneth M.; Baldwin, Marshall W. (eds.). A History of the Crusades, Volume I: The First Hundred Years. The University of Wisconsin Press. pp. 528–561. ISBN 0-299-04844-6.
- ISBN 978-0-14-015212-8.
- ISBN 0-521-06163-6.
Further reading
- Hamilton, Bernard (1978). "The Elephant of Christ: Reynald of Châtillon". Studies in Church History. 15 (15): 97–108. S2CID 163740720.