Dental implant
| Dental implant | |
|---|---|
 A titanium dental implant with a crown attached used for a single tooth replacement | |
| ICD-9-CM | 23.5-23.6 |
| MeSH | D003757 |
A dental implant (also known as an endosseous implant or fixture) is a
Success or failure of implants depends primarily on the thickness and health of the bone and gingival tissues that surround the implant, but also on the health of the person receiving the treatment and drugs which affect the chances of osseointegration. The amount of
The final prosthetic can be either fixed, where a person cannot remove the denture or teeth from their mouth, or removable, where they can remove the prosthetic. In each case an abutment is attached to the implant fixture. Where the prosthetic is fixed, the crown, bridge or denture is fixed to the abutment either with
The risks and complications related to implant therapy divide into those that occur during surgery (such as excessive bleeding or nerve injury, inadequate primary stability), those that occur in the first six months (such as infection and failure to osseointegrate) and those that occur long-term (such as peri-implantitis and mechanical failures). In the presence of healthy tissues, a well-integrated implant with appropriate biomechanical loads can have 5-year plus survival rates from 93 to 98 percent[2][3][4] and 10 to 15 year lifespans for the prosthetic teeth.[5] Long-term studies show a 16- to 20-year success (implants surviving without complications or revisions) between 52% and 76%, with complications occurring up to 48% of the time.[6][7] Artificial intelligence is relevant as the basis for clinical decision support systems at the present time.[8] Intelligent systems are used as an aid in determining the success rate of implants.[9]
Medical uses
The primary use of dental implants is to support dental prosthetics (i.e. false teeth). Modern dental implants, the biologic process where bone fuses tightly to the surface of specific materials such as titanium and some ceramics. The integration of implant and bone can support physical loads for decades without failure.[10]: 103–107
The US has seen an increasing use of dental implants, with usage increasing from 0.7% of patients missing at least one tooth (1999 - 2000), to 5.7% (2015 - 2016), and was projected to potentially reach 26% in 2026.[11] Implants are used to replace missing individual teeth (single tooth restorations), multiple teeth, or to restore edentulous dental arches (implant retained fixed bridge, implant-supported overdenture).[12] While use of dental implants in the US has increased, other treatments to tooth loss exist (see Missing tooth replacement, Tooth Loss).
Dental implants are also used in orthodontics to provide anchorage (orthodontic mini implants). Orthodontic treatment[13] might be required prior to placing a dental implant.
An evolving field is the use of implants to retain obturators (removable prosthesis used to fill a communication between the oral and maxillary or nasal cavities).[12] Facial prosthetics, used to correct facial deformities (e.g. from cancer treatment or injuries) can use connections to implants placed in the facial bones.[14] Depending on the situation the implant may be used to retain either a fixed or removable prosthetic that replaces part of the face.[15]
Single tooth implant restoration
Single tooth restorations are individual freestanding units not connected to other teeth or implants, used to replace missing individual teeth.
There is limited evidence that implant-supported single crowns perform better than tooth-supported fixed partial dentures (FPDs) on a long-term basis. However, taking into account the favorable cost-benefit ratio and the high implant survival rate, dental implant therapy is the first-line strategy for single-tooth replacement. Implants preserve the integrity of the teeth adjacent to the edentulous area, and it has been shown that dental implant therapy is less costly and more efficient over time than tooth-supported FPDs for the replacement of one missing tooth. The major disadvantage of dental implant surgery is the need for a surgical procedure.[17]
Implant retained fixed bridge or implant supported bridge
An implant supported bridge (or fixed denture) is a group of teeth secured to dental implants so the prosthetic cannot be removed by the user. They are similar to conventional bridges, except that the prosthesis is supported and retained by one or more implants instead of natural teeth. Bridges typically connect to more than one implant and may also connect to teeth as anchor points. Typically the number of teeth will outnumber the anchor points with the teeth that are directly over the implants referred to as abutments and those between abutments referred to as pontics. Implant supported bridges attach to implant abutments in the same way as a single tooth implant replacement. A fixed bridge may replace as few as two teeth (also known as a fixed partial denture) and may extend to replace an entire arch of teeth (also known as a fixed full denture). In both cases, the prosthesis is said to be fixed because it cannot be removed by the denture wearer.[16]
Implant-supported overdenture
A removable implant supported
Orthodontic mini-implants (TAD)
Dental implants are used in orthodontic patients to replace missing teeth (as above) or as a temporary anchorage device (TAD) to facilitate orthodontic movement by providing an additional anchorage point.[17][19] For teeth to move, a force must be applied to them in the direction of the desired movement. The force stimulates cells in the periodontal ligament to cause bone remodeling, removing bone in the direction of travel of the tooth and adding it to the space created. In order to generate a force on a tooth, an anchor point (something that will not move) is needed. Since implants do not have a periodontal ligament, and bone remodelling will not be stimulated when tension is applied, they are ideal anchor points in orthodontics. Typically, implants designed for orthodontic movement are small and do not fully osseointegrate, allowing easy removal following treatment.[20] They are indicated when needing to shorten treatment time, or as an alternative to extra-oral anchorage. Mini-implants are frequently placed between the roots of teeth, but may also be sited in the roof of the mouth. They are then connected to a fixed brace to help move the teeth.
Small Diameter Implants (Mini Implants)
The introduction of small-diameter implants has provided dentists the means of providing edentulous and partially edentulous patients with immediate functioning transitional prostheses while definitive restorations are being fabricated. Many clinical studies have been done on the success of long term usage of these implants. Based on the findings of many studies, mini dental implants exhibit excellent survival rates in the short to medium term (3–5 years). They appear to be a reasonable alternative treatment modality to retain mandibular complete overdentures from the available evidence.[21]
Composition
A typical conventional implant consists of a
Ceramic (zirconia-based) implants exist in one-piece (combining the screw and the abutment) or two-piece systems - the abutment being either cemented or screwed - and might lower the risk for peri‐implant diseases, but long-term data on success rates is missing.[26]
Technique
Planning
General considerations
Planning for dental implants focuses on the general health condition of the patient, the local health condition of the
It has been suggested that radiotherapy can negatively affect the survival of implants.[27] Nevertheless, a systemic study published in 2016 concluded that dental implants installed in the irradiated area of an oral cavity may have a high survival rate, provided that the patient maintains oral hygiene measures and regular follow ups to prevent complications.[28]
Biomechanical considerations
The long-term success of implants is determined in part by the forces they have to support. As implants have no periodontal ligament, there is no sensation of pressure when biting so the forces created are higher. To offset this, the location of implants must distribute forces evenly across the prosthetics they support.[29]: 15–39 Concentrated forces can result in fracture of the bridgework, implant components, or loss of bone adjacent the implant.[30] The ultimate location of implants is based on both biologic (bone type, vital structures, health) and mechanical factors. Implants placed in thicker, stronger bone like that found in the front part of the bottom jaw have lower failure rates than implants placed in lower density bone, such as the back part of the upper jaw. People who grind their teeth also increase the force on implants and increase the likelihood of failures.[16]: 201–208
The design of implants has to account for a lifetime of real-world use in a person's mouth. Regulators and the dental implant industry have created a series of tests to determine the long-term mechanical reliability of implants in a person's mouth where the implant is struck repeatedly with increasing forces (similar in magnitude to biting) until it fails.[31]
When a more exacting plan is needed beyond clinical judgment, the dentist will make an acrylic guide (called a stent) prior to surgery which guides optimal positioning of the implant. Increasingly, dentists opt to get a
Bisphosphonate drugs
The use of bone building drugs, like
Main surgical procedures
Placing the implant
Most implant systems have five basic steps for placement of each implant:[16]: 214–221
- Soft tissue reflection: An incision is made over the crest of bone, splitting the thicker attached gingivaroughly in half so that the final implant will have a thick band of tissue around it. The edges of tissue, each referred to as a flap are pushed back to expose the bone. Flapless surgery is an alternate technique, where a small punch of tissue (the diameter of the implant) is removed for implant placement rather than raising flaps.
- Drilling at high speed: After reflecting the soft tissue, and using a surgical guide or stent as necessary, pilot holes are placed with precision drills at highly regulated speed to prevent burning or pressure necrosis of the bone.
- Drilling at low speed: The pilot hole is expanded by using progressively wider drills (typically between three and seven successive drilling steps, depending on implant width and length). Care is taken not to damage the osteoblast or bone cells by overheating. A cooling saline or water spray keeps the temperature low.
- Placement of the implant: The implant screw is placed and can be self-tapping,[33]: 100–102 otherwise the prepared site is tapped with an implant analog. It is then screwed into place with a torque controlled wrench[37] at a precise torqueso as not to overload the surrounding bone (overloaded bone can die, a condition called osteonecrosis, which may lead to failure of the implant to fully integrate or bond with the jawbone).
- Tissue adaptation: The gingivais adapted around the entire implant to provide a thick band of healthy tissue around the healing abutment. In contrast, an implant can be "buried", where the top of the implant is sealed with a cover screw and the tissue is closed to completely cover it. A second procedure would then be required to uncover the implant at a later date.
Timing of implants after extraction of teeth
There are different approaches to placement dental implants after tooth extraction.[38] The approaches are:
- Immediate post-extraction implant placement.
- Delayed immediate post-extraction implant placement (two weeks to three months after extraction).
- Late implantation (three months or more after tooth extraction).
An increasingly common strategy to preserve bone and reduce treatment times includes the placement of a dental implant into a recent extraction site. On the one hand, it shortens treatment time and can improve aesthetics because the soft tissue envelope is preserved. On the other hand, implants may have a slightly higher rate of initial failure. Conclusions on this topic are difficult to draw, however, because few studies have compared immediate and delayed implants in a scientifically rigorous manner.[38]
One versus two-stage surgery
After an implant is placed the internal components are covered with either a healing abutment, or a cover screw. A healing abutment passes through the mucosa, and the surrounding mucosa is adapted around it. A cover screw is flush with the surface of the dental implant, and is designed to be completely covered by mucosa. After an integration period, a second surgery is required to reflect the mucosa and place a healing abutment.[39]: 190–1
In the early stages of implant development (1970−1990) implant systems used a two-stage approach, believing that it improved the odds of initial implant survival. Subsequent research suggests that no difference in implant survival existed between one-stage and two-stage surgeries, and the choice of whether or not to "bury" the implant in the first stage of surgery became a concern of soft tissue (
When tissue is deficient or mutilated by the loss of teeth, implants are placed and allowed to osseointegrate, then the gingiva is surgically moved around the healing abutments. The down-side of a two-stage technique is the need for additional surgery and compromise of circulation to the tissue due to repeated surgeries.[41]: 9–12 The choice of one or two-stages, now centers around how best to reconstruct the soft tissues around lost teeth.
Additional procedures to augment deficient bone in implant site
For an implant to
Hard tissue (bone) reconstruction
Bone grafting is necessary when there is a lack of bone. Also, it helps to stabilize the implant by increasing survival of the implant and decreasing marginal bone level loss.[43] While there are always new implant types, such as short implants, and techniques to allow compromise, a general treatment goal is to have a minimum of 10 mm (0.39 in) in bone height, and 6 mm (0.24 in) in width. Alternatively, bone defects are graded from A to D (A=10+ mm of bone, B=7–9 mm, C=4–6 mm and D=0–3 mm) where an implant's likelihood of osseointegrating is related to the grade of bone.[44]: 250
To achieve an adequate width and height of bone, various bone grafting techniques have been developed. The most frequently used is called
Three common procedures are:[44]: 236
- Sinus lift
- Lateral alveolar augmentation(increase in the width of a site)
- Vertical alveolar augmentation (increase in the height of a site)
Other, more invasive procedures, also exist for larger bone defects including mobilization of the inferior alveolar nerve to allow placement of a fixture, onlay bone grafting using the iliac crest or another large source of bone and microvascular bone graft where the blood supply to the bone is transplanted with the source bone and reconnected to the local blood supply.[29]: 5–6 The final decision about which bone grafting technique that is best is based on an assessment of the degree of vertical and horizontal bone loss that exists, each of which is classified into mild (2–3 mm loss), moderate (4–6 mm loss) or severe (greater than 6 mm loss).[45]: 17 Orthodontic extrusion or orthodontic implant site development can be used in selected cases for vertical/horizontal alveolar augmentation.[46]
Soft tissue (gingiva) reconstruction
The
When an adequate band of attached tissue is absent, it can be recreated with a soft tissue graft. There are four methods that can be used to transplant soft tissue. A roll of tissue adjacent to an implant (referred to as a palatal roll) can be moved towards the lip (buccal),
Additionally, for an implant to look esthetic, a band of full, plump gingiva is needed to fill in the space on either side of implant. The most common soft tissue complication is called a black-triangle, where the papilla (the small triangular piece of tissue between two teeth) shrinks back and leaves a triangular void between the implant and the adjacent teeth. Dentists can only expect 2–4 mm of papilla height over the underlying bone. A black triangle can be expected if the distance between where the teeth touch and bone is any greater.[33]: 81–84
The orthodontic implant site-switching technique
Alveolar bone resorption is a common side effect of tooth removal (extraction) due to severe tooth decay, trauma, or infection that limit dental implant placement. Surgical bone augmentation is associated with limitations such as high cost, bone graft rejection/failure, pain, infection, and the addition of 6–12 months to the treatment time till the graft matures. Compared with invasive bone augmentation surgery, orthodontic tooth movement has the capacity to regenerate the deficient alveolar ridge and create adequate bone volume for implant placement. This is particularly useful when restoring one or 2 missing teeth with implants; however, the orthodontic implant site-switching technique[50][51] can only be used when there is an edentulous area adjacent to healthy teeth that can be moved orthodontically into the edentulous site and generate healthy bone volume for implant placement.[52]
Orthodontic tooth movement can generate new bone.
Similarly, where there is a bone-deficient
Recovery
The prosthetic phase begins once the implant is well integrated (or has a reasonable assurance that it will integrate) and an abutment is in place to bring it through the mucosa. Even in the event of early loading (less than 3 months), many practitioners will place temporary teeth until osseointegration is confirmed. The prosthetic phase of restoring an implant requires an equal amount of technical expertise as the surgical because of the biomechanical considerations, especially when multiple teeth are to be restored. The dentist will work to restore the vertical dimension of occlusion, the esthetics of the smile, and the structural integrity of the teeth to evenly distribute the forces of the implants.[16]: 241–251
Healing time
There are various options for when to attach teeth to dental implants,[58] classified into:
- Immediate loading procedure.
- Early loading (one week to twelve weeks).
- Delayed loading (over three months)
For an implant to become
Single teeth, bridges and fixed dentures
An abutment is selected depending on the application. In many single crown and fixed partial denture scenarios (bridgework), custom abutments are used. An impression of the top of the implant is made with the adjacent teeth and gingiva. A dental lab then simultaneously fabricates an abutment and crown. The abutment is seated on the implant, a screw passes through the abutment to secure it to an internal thread on the implant (lag-screw). There are variations on this, such as when the abutment and implant body are one piece or when a stock (prefabricated) abutment is used. Custom abutments can be made by hand, as a cast metal piece or custom milled from metal or zirconia, all of which have similar success rates.[33]: 1233
The platform between the implant and the abutment can be flat (buttress) or conical fit. In conical fit abutments, the collar of the abutment sits inside the implant which allows a stronger junction between implant and abutment and a better seal against bacteria into the implant body. To improve the gingival seal around the abutment collar, a narrowed collar on the abutment is used, referred to as platform switching. The combination of conical fits and platform switching gives marginally better long term periodontal conditions compared to flat-top abutments.[60]
Regardless of the abutment material or technique, an impression of the abutment is then taken and a crown secured to the abutment with dental cement. Another variation on abutment/crown model is when the crown and abutment are one piece and the lag-screw traverses both to secure the one-piece structure to the internal thread on the implant. There does not appear to be any benefit, in terms of success, for cement versus screw-retained prosthetics, although the latter is believed to be easier to maintain (and change when the prosthetic fractures) and the former offers high esthetic performance.[33]: 1233
Prosthetic procedures for removable dentures
When a removable denture is worn, retainers to hold the denture in place can be either custom made or "off-the-shelf" (stock) abutments. When custom retainers are used, four or more implant fixtures are placed and an impression of the implants is taken and a dental lab creates a custom metal bar with attachments to hold the denture in place. Significant retention can be created with multiple attachments and the use of semi-precision attachments (such as a small diameter pin that pushes through the denture and into the bar) which allows for little or no movement in the denture, but it remains removable.[18]: 33–34 However, the same four implants angled in such a way to distribute occlusal forces may be able to safely hold a fixed denture in place with comparable costs and number of procedures giving the denture wearer a fixed solution.[61]
Alternatively, stock abutments are used to retain dentures using a male-adapter attached to the implant and a female adapter in the denture. Two common types of adapters are the ball-and-socket style retainer and the button-style adapter. These types of stock abutments allow movement of the denture, but enough retention to improve the quality of life for denture wearers, compared to conventional dentures.[62] Regardless of the type of adapter, the female portion of the adapter that is housed in the denture will require periodic replacement, however the number and adapter type does not seem to affect patient satisfaction with the prosthetic for various removable alternatives.[63]
Maintenance
After placement, implants need to be cleaned (similar to natural teeth) with a periodontal scaler to remove any plaque. Because of the more precarious blood supply to the gingiva, care should be taken with dental floss. Implants will lose bone at a rate similar to natural teeth in the mouth (e.g. if someone has periodontal disease, an implant can be affected by a similar disorder) but will otherwise last. The porcelain on crowns should be expected to discolour, fracture or require repair approximately every ten years, although there is significant variation in the service life of dental crowns based on the position in the mouth, the forces being applied from opposing teeth and the restoration material. Where implants are used to retain a complete denture, depending on the type of attachment, connections need to be changed or refreshed every one to two years.[29]: 76 An oral irrigator may also be useful for cleaning around implants.[64]
The same kinds of techniques used for cleaning teeth are recommended for maintaining hygiene around implants, and can be manually or professionally administered.[65] Examples of this would be using soft toothbrushes or nylon coated interproximal brushes.[65] The one implication during professional treatment is that metal instruments may cause damage to the metallic surface of the implant or abutment, which can lead to bacterial colonisation.[65] So, to avoid this, there are specially designed instruments made with hard plastic or rubber. Additionally rinsing (twice daily) with antimicrobial mouthwashes has been shown to be beneficial.[65] There is no evidence that one type of antimicrobial is better than the other.[65]
Peri-implantitis is a condition that may occur with implants due to bacteria, plaque, or design and it is on the rise.[65][66][67] This disease begins as a reversible condition called peri-implant mucositis but can progress to peri-implantitis if left untreated, which can lead to implant failure.[66][65] People are encouraged to discuss oral hygiene and maintenance of implants with their dentists.[65][66][67]
There are different interventions if peri-implantitis occurs, such as mechanical debridement, antimicrobial irrigation, and antibiotics. There can also be surgery such as open-flap debridement to remove bacteria, assess/smooth implant surface, or decontaminate implant surface.[66] There is not enough evidence to know which intervention is best in the case of peri-implantitis.[66]
Risks and complications
During surgery
Placement of dental implants is a surgical procedure and carries the normal risks of surgery including infection, excessive bleeding and necrosis of the flap of tissue around the implant. Nearby anatomic structures, such as the inferior alveolar nerve, the maxillary sinus and blood vessels, can also be injured when the osteotomy is created or the implant placed.[68] Even when the lining of the maxillary sinus is perforated by an implant, long term sinusitis is rare.[69] An inability to place the implant in bone to provide stability of the implant (referred to as primary stability of the implant) increases the risk of failure to osseointegration.[29]: 68
First six months
Primary implant stability
Primary implant stability refers to the stability of a dental implant immediately after implantation. The stability of the titanium screw implant in the patient's
The relevance of primary implant stability decreases gradually with regrowth of bone tissue around the implant in the first weeks after surgery, leading to secondary stability. Secondary stability is different from the initial stabilization, because it results from the ongoing process of bone regrowth into the implant (osseointegration). When this healing process is complete, the initial mechanical stability becomes biological stability. Primary stability is critical to implantation success until bone regrowth maximizes mechanical and biological support of the implant. Regrowth usually occurs during the 3–4 weeks after implantation. Insufficient primary stability, or high initial implant mobility, can lead to failure.
Immediate post-operative risks
- Infection (pre-op antibiotics reduce the risk of implant failure by 33 percent but do not affect the risk of infection).[71]
- Excessive bleeding[29]: 68
- Flap breakdown (less-than 5 percent)[29]: 68
Failure to integrate
An implant is tested between 8 and 24 weeks to determine if it is integrated. There is significant variation in the criteria used to determine implant success, the most commonly cited criteria at the implant level are the absence of pain, mobility, infection, gingival bleeding, radiographic lucency or peri-implant bone loss greater than 1.5 mm.[72]
Dental implant success is related to operator skill, quality and quantity of the bone available at the site, and the patient's
Integration failure is rare, particularly if a dentist's or oral surgeon's instructions are followed closely by the patient. Immediate loading implants may have a higher rate of failure, potentially due to being loaded immediately after trauma or extraction, but the difference with proper care and maintenance is well within statistical variance for this type of procedure. More often, osseointegration failure occurs when a patient is either too unhealthy to receive the implant or engages in behavior that contraindicates proper dental hygiene including smoking or drug use.
Long term
The long-term complications that result from restoring teeth with implants relate directly to the risk factors of the patient and the technology. There are the risks associated with appearance including a high smile line, poor gingival quality and missing papillae, difficulty in matching the form of natural teeth that may have unequal points of contact or uncommon shapes, bone that is missing, atrophied or otherwise shaped in an unsuitable manner, unrealistic expectations of the patient or poor oral hygiene. The risks can be related to biomechanical factors, where the geometry of the implants does not support the teeth in the same way the natural teeth did such as when there are cantilevered extensions, fewer implants than roots or teeth that are longer than the implants that support them (a poor crown-to-root ratio). Similarly, grinding of the teeth, lack of bone or low diameter implants increase the biomechanical risk.[74] : 27–51 Finally there are technological risks, where the implants themselves can fail due to fracture or a loss of retention to the teeth they are intended to support.[74]: 27–51
Long-term failures are due to either loss of bone around the tooth and/or gingiva due to
Criteria for the success of the implant supported dental prosthetic varies from study to study, but can be broadly classified into failures due to the implant, soft tissues or prosthetic components or a lack of satisfaction on the part of the patient. The most commonly cited criteria for success are function of at least five years in the absence of pain, mobility, radiographic lucency and peri-implant bone loss of greater than 1.5 mm on the implant, the lack of suppuration or bleeding in the soft tissues and occurrence of technical complications/prosthetic maintenance, adequate function, and esthetics in the prosthetic. In addition, the patient should ideally be free of pain,
The rates of complications vary by implant use and prosthetic type and are listed below:
Single crown implants (5-year)
- Implant survival: 96.8 percent[76]
- Crown survival: metal-ceramic: 95.4 percent; all-ceramic: 91.2 percent; cumulative rate of ceramic or acrylic veneer fracture: 4.5 percent[76]
- Peri-implantitis: 9.7 percent[76] up to 40 percent[77]
- Peri-implant mucositis: 50 percent[77]
- Implant fracture: 0.14 percent[76]
- Screw or abutment loosening: 12.7 percent[76]
- Screw or abutment fracture: 0.35 percent[76]
Fixed complete dentures
- Progressive vertical bone loss, but still in function (Peri-implantitis): 8.5 percent[4]
- Failure after the first year 5 percent at five years, 7 percent at ten years [4]
- Incidence of veneer fracture at:
- 5-year: 13.5[4] to 30.6 percent,[5]
- 10-year: 51.9 percent (32.3 to 75.5 percent with a confidence interval at 95 percent)[5]
- 15-year: 66.6 percent (44.3 to 86.4 percent with a confidence interval at 95 percent)[5]
- 10-year incidence of framework fracture: 6 percent (2.6 to 9.3 percent with a confidence interval at 95 percent)[5]
- 10-year incidence of esthetic deficiency: 6.1 percent (2.4 to 9.7 percent with a confidence interval at 95 percent)[5]
- prosthetic screw loosening: 5 percent over five years[4] to 15 percent over ten years[5]
The most common complication being fracture or wear of the tooth structure, especially beyond ten years[4][5] with fixed dental prostheses made of metal-ceramic having significantly higher ten-year survival compared those made of gold-acrylic.[4]
Removable dentures (overdentures)
- Loosening of removable denture retention: 33 percent[78]
- Dentures needing to be relined or having a retentive clip fracture : 16 to 19 percent[78]
History
There is
In modern times, a tooth replica implant was reported as early as 1969, but the polymethacrylate tooth analogue was encapsulated by soft tissue rather than osseointegrated.[83]
The early part of the 20th century saw a number of implants made of a variety of materials. One of the earliest successful implants was the Greenfield implant system of 1913 (also known as the Greenfield crib or basket).[84] Greenfield's implant, an iridioplatinum implant attached to a gold crown, showed evidence of osseointegration and lasted for a number of years.[84] The first use of titanium as an implantable material was by Bothe, Beaton and Davenport in 1940, who observed how close the bone grew to titanium screws, and the difficulty they had in extracting them.[85] Bothe et al. were the first researchers to describe what would later be called osseointegration (a name that would be marketed later on by Per-Ingvar Brånemark). In 1951, Gottlieb Leventhal implanted titanium rods in rabbits.[86] Leventhal's positive results led him to believe that titanium represented the ideal metal for surgery.[86]
In the 1950s research was being conducted at
- Root form implants; the most common type of implant indicated for all uses. Within the root form type of implant, there are roughly 18 variants, all made of titanium but with different shapes and surface textures. There is limited evidence showing that implants with relatively smooth surfaces are less prone to peri-implantitis than implants with rougher surfaces and no evidence showing that any particular type of dental implant has superior long-term success.[89]
- Zygoma implant; a long implant that can anchor to the cheek bone by passing through the maxillary sinus to retain a complete upper denture when bone is absent. While zygomatic implants offer a novel approach to severe bone loss in the upper jaw, it has not been shown to offer any advantage over bone grafting functionally although it may offer a less invasive option, depending on the size of the reconstruction required.[90]
- Small diameter implants are implants of low diameter with one-piece construction (implant and abutment) that are sometimes used for denture retention or orthodontic anchorage.[19]
See also
- Carl E. Misch
- Dennis P. Tarnow
- Leonard Linkow
- Per-Ingvar Brånemark
- Root analogue dental implant
- Implant bars
References
- ^ "Dental Materials | AMERICAN ELEMENTS ®". American Elements: The Materials Science Company. Retrieved 2024-02-14.
- ^ PMID 23311617.
- ^ PMID 12787220.
- ^ PMID 23062125.
- ^ PMID 21483883.
- PMID 20636731.
- PMID 23506385.
- PMID 36567879.
- ISSN 2076-3417.
- ^ a b c Misch CE (2007). Contemporary Implant Dentistry. St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby Elsevier.
- PMID 30075090.
- ^ OCLC 422757942.
- ^ Rooz D (2023-02-11). "Orthodontic treatment & Dental implant in Sammamish". Modern Orthodontic Clinic in Sammamish & Bellevue. Retrieved 2023-02-21.
- PMID 21492804.
- PMID 7596615.
- ^ ISBN 978-0867151299.
- ^ OCLC 1021055256.
- ^ ISBN 9780813804743.
- ^ PMID 19268825.
- ISBN 9780867154658.
- PMID 22870551.
- ISBN 978-0-415-30666-9, pp. 69-87.
- ISBN 9780781727334.
- ISBN 9781402062896.
- PMID 23093962.
- PMID 28000266.
- PMID 27034761.
- PMID 27460315.
- ^ ISBN 978-0867152425.
- ISBN 978-0867153088.
- ^ "Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff - Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Root-form Endosseous Dental Implants and Endosseous Dental Abutments". FDA. 2004-05-12. Retrieved 2013-11-11.
- PMID 18805228.
- ^ ISBN 9781405160995.
- PMID 19371809.
- PMID 23495556.
- PMID 37756422.
- PMID 19765196.
- ^ PMID 20847990. Archived from the original(PDF) on 2014-03-26.
- ^ a b Peterson LJ, Miloro M (2004). Peterson's Principles of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2nd Edition. PMPH-USA.
- PMID 20467608.
- ^ ISBN 978-0867153545.
- PMID 21622007.
- PMID 31620270.
- ^ ISBN 978-0867152494.
- ISBN 9780867154634.
- ISBN 9781119082835.
- ^ ISBN 9781437704167.
- S2CID 238249598.
- PMID 34562975.
- PMID 21728818.
- ISBN 9781119082835.
- PMID 37452379.
- PMID 37452379.
- PMID 8300319.
- PMID 21728818.
- ISBN 9781119082835.
- PMID 37452379.
- ^ PMID 23543525.
- PMID 19639076.
- S2CID 6507288.
- PMID 23560986.
- PMID 19467020.
- PMID 23236572.
- ^ Wingrove S. "Focus on implant home care Before, during, and after restoration". RDH Magazine. 33 (9).
- ^ PMID 20687072.
- ^ PMID 22258958.
- ^ PMID 22336822.
- PMID 18672980.
- PMID 24861778.
- PMID 26542097.
- PMID 23904048.
- ^ S2CID 5383897.
- PMID 20546821.
- ^ ISBN 978-0867153552.
- PMID 23297703.
- ^ S2CID 13599504. Archived from the original(PDF) on 2017-09-25. Retrieved 2018-12-03.
- ^ PMID 18724855.
- ^ PMID 12886205.
- ^ ISBN 9788131203002.
- ISBN 978-0-7020-2903-5.
- ^ Becker MJ (1999). Ancient "dental implants": a recently proposed example from France evaluated with other spurious examples (PDF). International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 14.1.
- ISBN 9780323078450.
- PMID 4612143.
- ^ a b Greenfield EJ (1913). "Implantation of artificial crown and bridge abutments". Dental Cosmos. 55: 364–369.
- ^ Bothe RT, Beaton KE, Davenport HA (1940). "Reaction of bone to multiple metallic implants". Surg Gynecol Obstet. 71: 598–602.
- ^ PMID 14824196.
- ISBN 9781461509158.
- ISBN 9781118646649.
- PMID 25048469.
- PMID 24009079.
Further reading
- Branemark PI, Zarb G (1989). Tissue-integrated prostheses (in English). Berlin, German: Quintessence Books. ISBN 978-0867151299.
- Branemark PI, Worthington P (1992). Advanced osseointegration surgery: applications in the maxillofacial region (in english). Carol Stream, Illinois: Quintessence Books. ISBN 978-0867152425.
- Laskin D (2007). Decision making in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Chicago: Quintessence Pub. Co. ISBN 9780867154634.
- Lee SL (2007). Applications of orthodontic mini implants. Hanover Park, Illinois: Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc. pp. 1–11. ISBN 9780867154658.
- Sclar A (2003). Soft tissue and esthetic considerations in implant dentistry (in english). Carol Stream, Illinois: Quintessence Books. ISBN 978-0867153545.
- Buser D, Schenk RK (1994). Guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry (in english). Hong Kong: Quintessence Books. ISBN 978-0867152494.
- Pallaci P (1995). Optimal implant positioning and soft tissue management for the Branemark system (in english). Germany: Quintessence Books. ISBN 978-0867153088.
- Renouard F (1999). Risk Factors in Implant Dentistry: Simplified Clinical Analysis for Predictable Treatment. Paris, France: Quintessence International. ISBN 978-0867153552.
- Lindhe J, Lang NP, Karring T, eds. (2008). Clinical Periodontology and Implant Dentistry 5th edition (in English). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Munksgaard. ISBN 9781405160995.
- Newman M, Takei H, Klokkevold P, eds. (2012). Carranza's Clinical Periodontology (in English). St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier Saunders. ISBN 9781437704167.
| Authority control databases: National |
|---|
