Early expansions of hominins out of Africa

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
This article is about spreading theory of early humans before about 200,000 years ago. For migrations of anatomically modern humans, see Recent African origin of modern humans.
Successive dispersals of   Homo erectus (yellow),   Homo neanderthalensis (ochre) and   Homo sapiens (red), with the numbers of years since they appeared.

Several expansions of populations of archaic humans (genus Homo) out of Africa and throughout Eurasia took place in the course of the Lower Paleolithic, and into the beginning Middle Paleolithic, between about 2.1 million and 0.2 million years ago (Ma). These expansions are collectively known as Out of Africa I, in contrast to the expansion of Homo sapiens (anatomically modern humans) into Eurasia, which may have begun shortly after 0.2 million years ago (known in this context as "Out of Africa II").[1]

The earliest presence of Homo (or indeed any hominin) outside of Africa dates to close to 2 million years ago. A 2018 study claims human presence at Shangchen, central China, as early as 2.12 Ma based on magnetostratigraphic dating of the lowest layer containing stone artefacts.[2] The oldest known human skeletal remains outside of Africa are from

Homo erectus georgicus
.

Later waves of expansion are proposed around 1.4 Ma (early

cleaver-producing Acheulean groups), associated with Homo heidelbergensis.[3]

Until the early 1980s, early humans were thought to have been restricted to the African continent in the Early Pleistocene, or until about 0.8 Ma; Hominin migrations outside East Africa were apparently rare in the Early Pleistocene, leaving a fragmentary record of events.[4][5]

Early dispersals

Further information: Homo, Oldowan, and Homo habilis

Pre-Homo hominin expansion out of Africa is suggested by the presence of Graecopithecus and Ouranopithecus, found in Greece and Anatolia and dated to c. 8 million years ago, but these are probably Homininae but not Hominini. Possibly related are the Trachilos footprints found in Crete, dated to close to 6 million years ago;[6] the age of the footprints was later reestimated to be 6.05 million years ago, 0.35 million years older than previous estimations.[7] Another reestimation by Willem Jan Zachariasse and Lucas Lourens interpret the purported footprints to have originated 3 million years ago and doubt if they were footprints or the hominins had made the footprints because of the shallow marine setting and the separation of Crete from mainland Greece and Turkey in the Late Pliocene by the South Aegean Basin.[8]

Afar Depression
).
Gracile australopithecines (Australopithecus afarensis
) emerged in the same region, around 4 million years ago. The earliest known retouched tools were found in Lomekwi, Kenya, and date back to 3.3 Ma, in the late Pliocene. They might be the product of Australopithecus garhi or Paranthropus aethiopicus, the two known hominins contemporary with the tools.[9] Genus Homo is assumed to have emerged by around 2.8 million years ago, with Homo habilis being found at Lake Turkana, Kenya. The delineation of the "human" genus, Homo, from Australopithecus is somewhat contentious, for which reason the superordinate term "hominin" is often used to include both. "Hominin" technically includes chimpanzees as well as pre-human species as old as 10 million years old (the separation of Homininae into Hominini and Gorillini).

The earliest known hominin presence outside of Africa dates to close to 2 million years ago. A 2018 study claims evidence for human presence at Shangchen, central China, as early as 2.12 Ma based on magnetostratigraphic dating of the lowest layer containing stone artefacts.[2]

It has been suggested that

Dmanisi Man, raising the possibility that the ancestors of H. floresiensis left Africa before the appearance of H. erectus.[10] A phylogenetic analysis published in 2017 suggests that H. floresiensis was descended from a species (presumably Australopithecine) ancestral to Homo habilis, making it a "sister species" either to H. habilis or to a minimally habilis-erectus-ergaster-sapiens clade, and its line is older than H. erectus itself. On the basis of this classification, H. floresiensis is hypothesized to represent a hitherto unknown and very early migration out of Africa, dating to before 2.1 million years ago. A similar conclusion is suggested by the date of 2.1 Ma for the oldest Shangchen artefacts.[2]

Homo erectus

Further information: Oldowan and Acheulean
cleaver
finds

Homo erectus emerges just after 2 million years ago.[11] Early H. erectus would have lived face to face with H. habilis in East Africa for nearly half a million years.[12] The oldest Homo erectus fossils appear almost contemporaneously, shortly after two million years ago, both in Africa and in the Caucasus. The earliest well-dated Eurasian H. erectus site is Dmanisi in Georgia, securely dated to 1.8 Ma.[13][14] A skull found at Dmanisi is evidence for caring for the old. The skull shows that this Homo erectus was advanced in age and had lost all but one tooth years before death, and it is perhaps unlikely that this hominid would have survived alone. It is not certain, however, that this is sufficient proof for caring – a partially paralysed chimpanzee at the Gombe reserve survived for years without help.[15] The earliest known evidence for African H. erectus, dubbed Homo ergaster, is a single occipital bone (KNM-ER 2598), described as "H. erectus-like", and dated to about 1.9 Ma (contemporary with

KNM-ER 3733, a skull dated to 1.6 Ma.[16]
Early Pleistocene sites in North Africa, the geographical intermediate of East Africa and Georgia, are in poor stratigraphic context. The earliest of the dated is Ain Hanech in northern Algeria (c. 1.8[17] – 1.2 Ma[18]), an Oldowan grade layer. These sites attest that early Homo erectus have crossed the North African tracts, which are usually hot and dry.[4]: 2  There is little time between Homo erectus' apparent arrival in South Caucasus around 1.8 Ma, and its probable arrival in East and Southeast Asia. There is evidence of H. erectus in Yuanmou, China, dating to 1.7 Ma and in Sangiran, on Java, Indonesia, from 1.66 Ma.[19]

Ferring et al. (2011) suggest that it was still Homo habilis that reached West Asia, and that early H. erectus developed there. H. erectus would then have dispersed from West Asia, to East Asia (Peking Man) Southeast Asia (Java Man), back to Africa (Homo ergaster), and to Europe (Tautavel Man).[20][21]

It appears H. erectus took longer to move into Europe, the earliest site being Barranco León in southeastern Spain dated to 1.4 Ma, associated with Homo antecessor,[22] and a controversial Pirro Nord in Southern Italy, allegedly from 1.7 – 1.3 Ma.[23] The paleobiogeography of early human dispersals in western Eurasia characterizes H. ex gr. erectus as a temperature sensitive stenobiont, that failed to disperse north of the Alpide Belt.[24] The geographically restricted earliest human presence in the Iberian Peninsula should be regarded as evidence of a sustainable presence of human population in this isolated area. The Pannonian plain, situated south-west of the Carpathian Mountains, was apparently characterized by a comparatively warm climate similar to that of the Mediterranean Area, while the climate of the western European paleobiogeographic area was mitigated by Gulf Stream influence and could support the episodic hominin dispersals toward the Iberian Peninsula.[24] Apparently, the faunal exchanges between southeastern Europe and the Near East and southern Asia were controlled by the complex interaction of such geographic obstacles as the Bosporus and the Manych Strait, the climate barrier from the north of the Greater Caucasus range, and the 41 kyr glacial Milankovitch cycles that repeatedly closed the Bosporus and thus triggered the two-way faunal exchange between southeastern Europe and the Near East, and, apparently, the further westward dispersal of the archaic hominins in Eurasia.[25]

By 1 Ma, Homo erectus had spread across Eurasia (mostly restricted to latitudes south of the 50th parallel north[26]). It is hard to say, however, whether settlement was continuous in Western Europe, or if successive waves repopulated the territory in glacial interludes. Early Acheulean tools at Ubeidiya from 1.4 Ma[27] is some evidence for a continuous settlement in the West, as successive waves out of Africa after then would likely have brought Acheulean technology to Western Europe.[citation needed]

The presence of Lower Paleolithic human remains in Indonesian islands is good evidence for seafaring by Homo erectus late in the Early Pleistocene. Bednarik suggests that navigation had appeared by 1 Ma, possibly to exploit offshore fishing grounds.[28] He has reproduced a primitive dirigible (steerable) raft to demonstrate the feasibility of faring across the Lombok Strait on such a device, which he believes to have been done before 850 ka. The strait has maintained a width of at least 20 km for the whole of the Pleistocene. Such an achievement by Homo erectus in the Early Pleistocene offers some strength to the suggested water routes out of Africa, as the Gibraltar, Sicilian, and Bab-el-Mandeb exit routes are harder to consider if watercraft are deemed beyond the capacities of Homo erectus.

Homo heidelbergensis

Archaic humans in Europe beginning about 0.8 Ma (

cleaver-producing
Acheulean groups) are classified as a separate, erectus-derived species, known as Homo heidelbergensis.[3] H. heidelbergensis from about 0.4 Ma develops its own characteristic industry, known as Clactonian. H. heidelbergensis is closely related to Homo rhodesiensis (also identified as Homo heidelbergensis sensu lato or African H. heidelbergensis), known to be present in southern Africa by 0.3 Ma.

Out of Africa II and "earliest presence of H. sapiens in West Asia, may date to between .3 and 0.2 Ma,[29] and ascertained for 0.13 Ma.[30] Genetic research also indicates that a later migration wave of H. sapiens (from .07-.05 Ma) from Africa is responsible for all to most of the ancestry of current non-African populations.[31][32][33]

Routes out of Africa

Most attention as to the route taken from Africa to West Asia is given to the Levantine land corridor and the Bab-el-Mandeb straits. The latter separates the Horn of Africa and Arabia, and may have allowed dry passage during some periods of the Pleistocene. Another candidate is the Strait of Gibraltar. A route across the Strait of Sicily was suggested in the 1970s but is now considered unlikely.

Levantine corridor

The use by hominins of the

Misliya cave, are used as indicators of this migration route.[citation needed] As of 2012, the genetic analysis of human populations in Africa and Eurasia supports the concept that during the Paleolithic and Mesolithic periods, this route was more important for bi-directional human migrations between Africa and Eurasia than was the Horn of Africa.[34]

Horn of Africa to Arabia (Bab el-Mandeb)

Bab-el-Mandeb strait

Bab-el-Mandeb is a 30 km strait between East Africa and the Arabian Peninsula, with a small island, Perim, 3 km off the Arabian bank. The strait has a major appeal in the study of Eurasian expansion in that it brings East Africa close to Eurasia. It does not require hopping from one water body to the next across the North African desert.[citation needed]

The land connection with Arabia disappeared in the Pliocene,[35] and though it may have briefly reformed,[when?][36] the evaporation of the Red Sea and associated increase in salinity would have left traces in the fossil record after just 200 years and evaporite deposits after 600 years. Neither have been detected.[37] A strong current flows from the Red Sea into the Indian Ocean and crossing would have been difficult without a land connection.

Oldowan grade tools are reported from Perim Island,[38] implying that the strait could have been crossed in the Early Pleistocene, but these finds have yet to be confirmed.[39]

Strait of Gibraltar

The

sea levels in the Pleistocene due to glaciation
would not have brought this down to less than 10 km. Deep currents push westwards, and surface water flows strongly back into the Mediterranean. Entrance into Eurasia across the strait of Gibraltar could explain the hominin remains at Barranco León in southeastern Spain (1.4 Ma)[22] and Sima del Elefante in northern Spain (1.2 Ma).[40][41] But the site of Pirro Nord in southern Italy, allegedly from 1.3 – 1.7 Ma,[23] suggests a possible arrival from the East. Resolution is insufficient to settle the matter.[5]

Strait of Sicily

Passage across the Strait of Sicily was suggested by Alimen (1975)[42] based on the 1973 discovery of Oldowan grade tools in Sicily.[43] Radiometric dates, however, have not been produced, and the artefacts might as well be from the Middle Pleistocene,[44] and it is unlikely that there was a land bridge during the Pleistocene.[4]: 3 

Causes for dispersal

Climate change and hominin flexibility

For a given species in a given environment, available resources will limit the number of individuals that can survive indefinitely. This is the carrying capacity. Upon reaching this threshold, individuals may find it easier to gather resources in the poorer yet less exploited peripheral environment than in the preferred habitat. Homo habilis could have developed some baseline behavioural flexibility prior to its expansion into the peripheries (such as encroaching into the predatory guild[45][46]). This flexibility could then have been positively selected and amplified, leading to Homo erectus' adaptation to the peripheral open habitats.[47] A new and environmentally flexible hominin population could have come back to the old niche and replaced the ancestral population.[48] Moreover, some step-wise shrinking of the woodland and the associated reduction of hominin carrying capacity in the woods around 1.8 Ma, 1.2 Ma, and 0.6 Ma would have stressed the carrying capacity's pressure for adapting to the open grounds.[49][50] With Homo erectus' new environmental flexibility, favourable climate fluxes likely opened it the way to the Levantine corridor, perhaps sporadically, in the Early Pleistocene.[4] There is evidence that the Mid-Pleistocene Revolution facilitated mammalian turnovers during the Late Early and Early Middle Pleistocene that may have included the hominin dispersals observed in the fossil record around this time.[51]

Chasing fauna

MIS 12). It became extinct in Africa c. 1.5 Ma,[53] but had already moved out through the Sinai, and is among the faunal remains of the Levantine hominin site of Ubeidiya, c. 1.4 Ma.[27] It could not break bone marrow and its kills were likely an important food source for hominins,[54] especially in glacial periods.[55] According to this hypothesis, hominins would also have successfully competed with the kleptoparasitic giant short-faced hyena, Pachycrocuta, for these carcasses.[56] In colder Eurasian times, the hominin diet would have to be principally meat-based and Acheulean hunters must have competed with cats.[citation needed
]

Some papers have argued against this hypothesis, showing that the dispersals of hominins from Africa into Eurasia were asynchronous with those of other land mammals and that the latter was thus unlikely to be the cause of the former.[57][58]

Coevolved zoonotic diseases

Bar-Yosef and Belfer-Cohen[3] suggest that the success of hominins within Eurasia once out of Africa is in part due to the absence of zoonotic diseases outside their original habitat. Zoonotic diseases are those that are transmitted from animals to humans. While a disease specific to hominins must keep its human host alive long enough to transmit itself, zoonotic diseases will not necessarily do so as they can complete their life cycle without humans. Still, these infections are well accustomed to human presence, having evolved alongside them. The higher an African ape's population density, the better a disease fares. 55% of chimps at the Gombe reserve die of disease, most of them zoonotic.[59] The majority of these diseases are still restricted to hot and damp African environments. Once hominins had moved out into drier and colder habitats of higher latitudes, one major limiting factor in population growth was out of the equation.

Physiological traits

While Homo habilis was certainly bipedal, its long arms are indicative of an arboreal adaptation.[60] Homo erectus had longer legs and shorter arms, revealing a transition to obligate terrestriality, though it remains unclear how this change in relative leg length might have been an advantage.[61] Sheer body size, on the other hand, seems to have allowed for better walking energy efficiency and endurance.[62] A larger Homo erectus would also dehydrate more slowly and could thus cover greater distances before facing thermoregulatory limitations.[63] The ability for prolonged walking at a normal pace would have been a decisive factor for effective colonisation of Eurasia.[64]

See also

References

  1. ^ The term "Out of Africa I" is informal and somewhat rare. The phrase Out of Africa used on its own generally refers to "Out of Africa II", the expansion of anatomically modern humans into Eurasia. "Out of Africa I" is used in 2004, in Marco Langbroek, 'Out of Africa': an investigation into the earliest occupation of the Old World, p. 61, and as the title of a collection of essays, J. G. Fleagle et al. (eds.), Out of Africa I: The First Hominin Colonization of Eurasia (2010). see also: Herschkovitz, Israel; et al. (26 January 2018). "The earliest modern humans outside Africa".
    PMID 29371468
    .    ; Hurtley, Stella; Szuromi, Phil (2005). "Out of Africa Revisited". Science. 308 (5724): 922.
    S2CID 220100436
    .
  2. ^
    S2CID 49670311
    . "Eight major magnetozones are recorded in the Shangchen section, four of which have normal polarity (N1 to N4) and four of which have reversed polarity (R1 to R4). By comparison with the geomagnetic polarity timescale [...] magnetozone N4 corresponds to the Réunion excursion (2.13–2.15 Ma) in L28."
  3. ^
    doi:10.1016/S1040-6182(00)00074-4
    .
  4. ^
    ISBN 978-90-481-9035-5
    .
  5. ^
    doi:10.1016/s1040-6182(00)00071-9
    .
  6. ISSN 0016-7878
    .
  7. PMID 34635686
    .
  8. PMID 36323766
    .
  9. doi:10.1006/jasc.1999.0592
    .
  10. PMID 26202999
    .
  11. ^ Van Arsdale, A. P. (2013). "Homo erectus – A Bigger, Smarter, Faster Hominin Lineage". Nature Education Knowledge. 4 (1): 2.
  12. S2CID 35845
    .
  13. PMID 21646521
    .
  14. doi:10.1016/j.quageo.2009.09.012
    .
  15. S2CID 41892278
    .
  16. PMID 27298460
    .
  17. PMID 12473489
    .
  18. PMID 15183674
    .
  19. doi:10.1016/S1040-6182(00)00079-3
    .
  20. PMID 21646521
    .
  21. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.04.012
    .
  22. ^
    PMID 23481345
    .
  23. ^
    S2CID 42198
    .
  24. ^
    doi:10.1016/j.crpv.2017.09.004
    .
  25. doi:10.3390/quat1020017
    .
  26. ^ the northernmost known Middle Pleistocene site is Whithlingham, at 52.6° N. Mourre, V., Implications culturelles de la technologie des hachereaux, doctoral thesis, Université de Paris X – Nanterre (2003) Fig. 48 (p. 115).
  27. ^
    PMID 19427671
    .
  28. S2CID 83823911
    .
  29. ^
    doi:10.1038/nature.2017.22114
    . Retrieved 11 June 2017. Posth, Cosimo; et al. (4 July 2017). "Deeply divergent archaic mitochondrial genome provides lower time boundary for African gene flow into Neanderthals".
    PMID 28675384
    .
  30. S2CID 20296624
    .
  31. PMID 27654910
    .
  32. S2CID 140098861
    .
  33. PMID 31196864
    .
  34. ^ J. R. Luis et al., "The Levant versus the Horn of Africa: Evidence for Bidirectional Corridors of Human Migrations" Archived 2012-02-16 at the Wayback Machine, American Journal of Human Genetics, 74: 532-544.
  35. doi:10.1016/s0012-821x(03)00488-6
    .
  36. S2CID 24673686
    .
  37. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01478.x
    .
  38. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9059-2
  39. S2CID 13705573
    .
  40. PMID 15824320
    .
  41. S2CID 4401629
    .
  42. ^ Alimen, H. (1975). "Les 'Isthmes' hispano-marocain et Sicilo-Tunisien aux temps Acheuléens". L'Anthropologie, 79, 399–436.
  43. ^ Bianchini, G. (1973). "Gli 'hacheraux' nei giacimenti paleolitici della Sicilia sud occidentale". Proceedings of the XV Scientific Meeting of the Italian Institute of Prehistory and Protohistory, 11–25 October 1972.
  44. doi:10.1016/s1040-6182(00)00083-5
    .
  45. S2CID 2930029
    .
  46. ^ Lewis, M. E., & Werdelin, L. (2007). "Patterns of change in the Plio-Pleistocene carnivorans of eastern Africa: Implications for hominin Evolution". In R. Bobe, Z. Alemseged, & A. K. Behrensmeyer (Eds.), Hominin environments in the East African Pliocene: An assessment of the faunal evidence. Springer, 77–106.
  47. doi:10.1016/0047-2484(89)90018-3
    .
  48. PMID 9139351
    .
  49. S2CID 129580598
    .
  50. S2CID 4400133
    .
  51. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2015.08.034
    . Retrieved 19 March 2024 – via Elsevier Science Direct.
  52. ^ Shipman, P. A. T. (1984). Hunting in Early Hominids: Theoretical Framework and Tests, 27–43.
  53. doi:10.1006/jasc.1998.0346
    .
  54. ^ Lewis, M.E., Werdelin, L. (2010). "Carnivoran Dispersal Out of Africa During the Early Pleistocene: Relevance for Hominins?". In: A. Baden et al. (Eds.), Out of Africa I: The First Hominin Colonization of Eurasia. Springer Netherlands, pp. 13-26.
  55. S2CID 162093694
    .
  56. PMID 37770511
    .
  57. ISSN 0277-3791
    . Retrieved 5 February 2024 – via Elsevier Science Direct.
  58. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2011.12.019
    . Retrieved 26 March 2024 – via Elsevier Science Direct.
  59. ^ Goodall, J., (1986). The Chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of Behavior. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  60. PMID 18711733
    .
  61. PMID 8967332
    .
  62. S2CID 85387559
    .
  63. doi:10.1016/0047-2484(92)90071-g
    .
  64. ^ Klein, R. G. (1999). The human career: Human biological and human origins, (2nd ed.). Chicago: Chicago University Press. 249-250.

Further reading
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Early_expansions_of_hominins_out_of_Africa&oldid=1221432987"