Hetoimasia
The Hetoimasia, Etimasia (Greek ἑτοιμασία, "preparation"), prepared throne, Preparation of the Throne, ready throne or Throne of the Second Coming is the Christian version of the symbolic subject of the empty throne found in the art of the ancient world, whose meaning has changed over the centuries. In
The motif consists of an empty throne and various other symbolic objects, in later depictions surrounded when space allows by angels paying homage. It is usually placed centrally in schemes of composition, very often in a roundel, but typically is not the largest element in a scheme of decoration.[2]
The empty throne in pre-Christian art
The "empty throne" had a long pre-Christian history. An
Early
Like the Greeks and other ancient peoples, the Romans held ritual banquets for the gods (a ritualized "
A seat with jewelled wreath is seen on coins from the
Later non-Christian uses of the empty throne motif include the "Bema Feast", the most important annual feast of Persian Manichaeism, when a "bema" or empty throne represented the prophet Mani at a meal for worshippers.[14] In the Balinese version of Hinduism, the most prominent element in most temples is the padmasana or "Lotus Throne", an empty throne for the supreme deity Acintya.[15]
In the Ashanti Empire, the Golden Stool was used as a symbol of authority for the kings. It was considered so sacred that it was not allowed to touch the ground (but only placed on a blanket) or seated on its own throne.
Christian art
There are several elements found in the image which reflect its changing meaning. The throne itself is always present, and is often backless and armless. In Ancient Greek, a "thronos" was a specific but ordinary type of chair with a footstool, and there is very often a footstool in the image. There is often a prominent cushion, and a cloth variously interpreted as Christ's mantle (especially when of imperial purple) or a
The dove of the
Meaning of the image
The image was one of many aspects of imperial
In the earlier versions the throne is most often accompanied by a cross and a scroll or book, which at this stage represents the Gospels. In this form the whole image represents Christ, but when the dove of the Holy Spirit and the cross are seen, the throne appears to represent God the Father, and the whole image the
literally "preparation", meaning "that which has been prepared" or "that which is made ready", and specifically refers to the "sign of the Son of Man" and the Last Judgement. By this time the image usually occurs in the West only under direct Byzantine influence, as in Venice and Torcello.Some Early Christians had believed that the True Cross had miraculously ascended to Heaven, where it remained in readiness to become the glorified "sign of the Son of man" (see below) at the Last Judgement. The Discovery by Helena had displaced this view as to the fate of the actual cross, but the idea of the return at the Last Judgement of the glorified cross remained, as in a homily by Pope Leo the Great (d. 461), which was incorporated in the Roman Breviary.[24]
Early examples
Although it is assumed that other examples existed earlier, the earliest surviving Christian hetoimasia is in the earliest major scheme of church decoration to survive, the mosaics in
Elsewhere it may occupy the centre of a frieze below a larger composition in the apse
The 6th-century "throne-reliquary" in rather crudely carved
Later use
During the Middle Byzantine period the etimasia became a standard feature of the evolving subject of the
Another context in which the etimasia sometimes appears from the Middle Byzantine period is
It has been suggested that the empty stool with a cushion in the foreground of Jan van Eyck's Annunciation in Washington may suggest the empty throne; van Eyck characteristically uses domestic fittings to represent doctrinal references.[32]
Scriptural references
The image has been regarded as illustrating a number of different passages from the Bible. For the later Byzantines the etimasia was the "sign of the Son of man" of Matthew 24:30: "And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory".[33] The understanding of the image as a symbol for the Second Coming also drew on Psalms 9:7: "But the Lord shall endure for ever: he hath prepared his throne for judgment".[34] where the Septuagint has "ἡτοίμασεν" ("hetoimasen") for "prepared".[35] Psalm 89:14:"Justice and judgment are the habitation of thy throne: mercy and truth shall go before thy face" is another relevant passage, using the word in the Septuagint (instead of the "habitation" of the King James Version), giving "ἑτοιμασία τοῦ θρόνου" or "preparation of your throne".[36] Throne imagery is found above all in the Book of Revelation, especially chapter 4, although the throne therein is already occupied.
Terminology
The Greek verb ἑτοιμασεν ("hetoimasen") means "to prepare" or "to make ready". It will be seen that the name "hetoimasia", meaning "preparation" or "that which has been prepared", with "throne" ("thronos" in Greek) only implied,[37] is more appropriate to the Eastern images after about 1000 than to those before. The use of the name for both groups was established in the 19th century by the French art historian Paul Durand (from 1867), and despite protests has stuck.[38] In more modern Orthodox contexts "etimasia" and "prepared throne" are typically used, and in art history relating to the earlier group "hetoimasia" and "empty throne" - exclusively the latter in non-Christian contexts where a more specialized term is not used. There are various other transliterations and translations: "hetimasia", "throne made ready" etc.
Notes
- ^ Schiller, II, 186.
- ^ Hall, 94
- ^ Krishan, pp. 1 and 5, fig 4a caption
- ^ Berlin relief
- ^ Hall, 95
- ^ Haran, 247-249, and later in the chapter. See his notes for further literature
- ^ Syndicus, 151
- ^ Hall, 95, coin 1st century CE from Cilicia
- ^ Example from the V&A museum. The alternative theory, first advanced by Huntington (see her final paragraph), sees these images as depictions of an actual relic-throne of the Buddha as an object of worship at major Buddhist sites, but this remains controversial.
- ^ Ramsay, 344
- ^ Humphrey, 78-80
- ^ Humphrey, 79; Hall, 95; Hellemo, 107; Fishwick. See Temple 10, note 12 for detailed studies
- ^ Hellemo, 107
- ^ The Cambridge history of Iran: The Seleucid, Parthian and Sasanian periods
- ^ Davison and Granquist, 8-9, Baliblog, with images
- ^ Schiller, I, 132
- ^ Schiller, II, 187, noting the exception of a single occurrence in the Utrecht Psalter.
- ^ Hall, 94, where both are illustrated, and 141
- ^ Voroneţ Monastery, feature with good image (in Romanian)
- ^ Hall, 95
- ^ Beckwith, 116-118
- ^ Parani, 196
- ^ Parani, 196
- ^ Werner, 35 and note 42
- ^ Beckwith, 111, and 37 on date
- ^ Soper, 154-157
- Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online, subscription or library access required(accessed November 8, 2010).
- ^ Morgan, 8. It is also known as the Orthodox Baptistry. See also Weinryb, 44, 48-51.
- ^ Buckton, 98-105
- V&A Museum, notes on ivory Last Judgement [1]
- ^ Demus, 55-57, and plate 13; also Parani, 196. See here for further details]
- ISBN 0-521-34016-0. Entry pp. 75-86, by Hand.
- ^ See Hellemo, 102-104 for arguments that the earliest examples also carried this meaning (he disagrees)
- ^ Schiller, II 98 & 187
- ^ Psalms 9:7: καὶ ὁ κύριος εἰς τὸν αἰῶνα μένει ἡτοίμασεν ἐν κρίσει τὸν θρόνον αὐτοῦ Biblos website
- ^ Temple, 8-9, Biblos website
- ^ Contrary to many sources who should know better, and say hetoimasia "means" empty throne etc.
- ^ Hellemo, 104-105
References
- Beckwith, John, Early Christian and Byzantine Art, Penguin History of Art (now Yale), 2nd edn. 1979, ISBN 0-14-056033-5
- Buckton, David, et al., The Treasury of San Marco Venice, 1984, Metropolitan Museum of Art, (fully available online or as PDF from the MMA)
- ISBN 0-226-14292-2
- Davison, Julian, & Granquist, Bruce, Balinese temples, Tuttle Publishing, 1999,
- Hall, James, A History of Ideas and Images in Italian Art, 1983, John Murray, London, ISBN 0-7195-3971-4
- Haran, Menachem, Temples and temple-service in ancient Israel: an inquiry into biblical cult phenomena and the historical setting of the priestly school, 2nd edn, 1985, Eisenbrauns,
- Hellemo, Geir. Adventus Domini: eschatological thought in 4th-century apses and catecheses, BRILL, 1989,
- Humphrey, John H, Roman circuses: arenas for chariot racing, University of California Press, 1986,
- Huntington, S. L., Early Buddhist art and the theory of aniconism, Art Journal, Vol. 49 No. 4 Winter.1990. pp. 401–408.
- Krishan, Yuvraj, The Buddha image: its origin and development, 1996, Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan,
- Parani, Maria G., Reconstructing the reality of images: Byzantine material culture and religious iconography (11th-15th centuries), Volume 41 of The medieval Mediterranean : Peoples, Economies and Cultures, 400-1453, BRILL, 2003,
- Ramsay, William, A manual of Roman antiquities, 5th edition, 1863, OUP, google book
- ISBN 0-85331-324-5
- ISBN 0-7011-2514-4
- Soper, Alexander Coburn, "The Italo-Gallic School of Early Christian Art", The Art Bulletin, Vol. 20, No. 2 (Jun., 1938), pp. 145–192, JSTOR
- Syndicus, Eduard; Early Christian Art, Burns & Oates, London, 1962
- Temple, Nicholas, Conversion and Political Expedience, Imperial themes in the Early Christian Baptistry, Anales del Instituto de Investigaciones Estéticas, vol XXIX, no. 80, Mexico City, 2002. PDF
- Weinryb, Ittai, A Tale of Two Baptisteries: Royal and Ecclesiastical Patronage in Ravenna, 2002, Assaph, Studies in Art History, vol 7, Tel Aviv University, online html
- Werner, Martin (1992). "The Liudhard Medalet". In Michael Lapidge; Malcolm Godden; Simon Keynes (eds.). Anglo-Saxon England 20. Cambridge University Press. pp. 27–41. ISBN 0-521-41380-X.
Further reading
The main literature is in German - see the list given here.