Laquintasaura

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Laquintasaura
Temporal range:
Ma
Hettangian
Reconstruction of Laquintasaura venezuelae
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Clade: Dinosauria
Clade: Ornithischia
Genus: Laquintasaura
Barrett et al., 2014
Species:
L. venezuelae
Binomial name
Laquintasaura venezuelae
Barrett et al., 2014

Laquintasaura is a genus of

Taxonomic uncertainty has led to conflicting theories that it is either as the base of Ornithischia or at the base of the subgroup Thyreophora. In either model, its dating to around 200 million years ago, at the start of the Jurassic, existence in equatorial latitudes, and primitive nature make it a key view into early ornithischian evolution. It's thought that Laquintasaura would've lived in groups and had a possible omnivorous diet, living on a seasonal alluvial plain and being preyed about by the contemporary Tachiraptor
.

Discovery and naming

Locality of the bonebed where all known material of Laquintasaura has been found

The bonebed would produce material eventually named as Laquintasaura was originally discovered in the 1980s, by a team of French palaeontologists. The bonebed is found near a road between the towns of La Grita and Seboruco, in the Táchira state of Venezuela, in rocks pertaining to the Early Jurassic La Quinta Formation; it is directly opposite to the type section of the formation, separated by possible geologic faults. These initial French discoveries - two teeth and a quadrate would be brought to Paris and described by D.E. Russel and colleagues in a 1992 study; based on similar cranial anatomy, they were referred to the genus Lesothosaurus, an early ornithischian from the Early Jurassic of Lesotho and South Africa. Unaware of the French team's discoveries, Marcelo R. Sánchez-Villagra and colleagues would make their own expeditions into the La Quinta Formation; initially finding no vertebrate fossils in 1989, they'd later rediscover the bonebed in the first of three expeditions in 1992 and 1993; dinosaur expert James Clark was the one to first notice the easy to miss locality. A few plaster jackets worth of fossils were recovered and transported by Sánchez-Villagra to Buenos Aires in Argentina, where he and the team of Dr. Guillermo Rougier spent three months partially preparing the fossils. After this they were returned to Venezuela, being brought to Universidad Simón Bolívar where Sánchez-Villagra had written his thesis. Several years later in the late 1990s, Sánchez-Villagra would become aware of the French specimens and co-ordinate their return to Venezuela as well, deposited in the collections of the Museu de Biología de la Universidad de Zulia (MBLUZ).[1]

Sánchez-Villagra become aware he was no longer permitted to study the fossils that had been deposited at the Universidad Simón Bolívar soon after they have been transferred, and resolved to conduct new expeditions to gather additional material from the bonebed; the Universidad Simón Bolívar material has gone unstudied since. Shortly before hearing this news an attempted expedition had failed due to a truck failure. A successful trip was organized in December 1993, with a new team from Caracas, which produced abundant new material. This was deposited in the MBLUZ, like the original French material. Early preparation of these blocks was reported on at the 1994 conference of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology. Sánchez-Villagra and Fernando Novas, who had met during the preparation in Buenos Aires, obtained a grant from the Jurassic Foundation to study the 1993 material. The project would eventually become based in the Natural History Museum in London, England and would bring in Paul Barrett. He, Novas, Sánchez-Villagra, and colleagues would finally publish on the material in a 2008 paper in the scientific journal PalZ, identifying a likely new genus of ornithischian among many other indeterminate animals but not naming it until further material was known.[1]

Tibia and ischium of Tachiraptor, whose remains are found in the same bonebed as Laquintasaura

That further material would become recognized and published on in a 2014 paper in the journal

Proceedings of the Royal Society B by a team including Barrett and Sánchez-Villagra. This paper would re-evaluate the 2008 paper's conclusions, finding through comparisons with newly prepared material as well as new data on the usefulness of identifying features relied on by the 2008 study that almost all material in the bonebed (excepting two theropod teeth, later described with a newly recognized tibia as Tachiraptor[1][2]) in fact belonged to the previously identified ornithischian taxon. With the entire wealth of material now recognized as belonging to the taxon, they formally named it as Laquintasaura venezuelae. The generic name derives from the name of the geologic formation and the feminine Greek suffix for lizard; the specific name refers to the country and people of Venezuela. Material prepared as of the publication of the paper included isolated cranial remains, an abundance of teeth, all four major types of vertebrae, a scapula, pelvic and hindlimb material, and other isolated postcranial elements. Forelimb material was completely absent, and material from the hindfeet was very limited. Much of the material was still unprepared at this time, and it's possible much more material remains ungathered from the bonebed.[3] A later 2021 study by Carlos-Manuel Herrera-Castillo, Sánchez-Villagra, and colleagues described a premaxilla prepared and studied since the 2014 paper; at the time of this publication, study and preparation of much material remains ongoing.[1] As it is the oldest reliably dated ornithischian, hailing from the very start of the Jurassic, its discovery is considered to very significant.[1][3]

Hundreds of individual fossil elements are known for Laquintasaura, representing a minimum of four individuals and potentially many more. The majority of known remains are thought to represent subadult individuals, but one small

type series with paratypes MBLUZ P.5017, a partial femur; MBLUZ P.5018, partial left ischium; and MBLUZ P.5005, a left astragalocalcaneum. Though the choice of a tooth as the type specimen is uncommon for a dinosaur, it was chosen due to being the most distinctive aspect of the anatomy, being a very abundant element of the sample, and the unlikelihood that teeth would different in different parts of the mouth due to the uniformity of the known teeth and anatomy of relatives.[3]

Description

Size diagram of Laquintasaura, based on known remains; adults may have grown slightly larger

Like other early members of Ornithischia, it is assumed that Laquintasaura was a lithe

quadrupeality.[3]

The most distinctive part of the anatomy is Laquintasaura is found in its

The

synapomorphies can be seen in the pelvic anatomy. In addition to its diagnostic features, numerous differences from other individual basal ornithischian taxa were noted, described in detail in the supplementary material of the 2014 description paper.[3]

The

marginocephalians. However, the lack of data on primitive ornithischian histology as well as the limited sample size available for Laquintasaura, these conclusions remain uncertain.[3]

Classification

Armored dinosaur Scutellosaurus; Laquintasaura may have been an early member of the armored dinosaur lineage

The specifics of the

sister taxon of Scutellosaurus.[9][10] Bone histology, similar to Scutellosaurus but unlike Lesothosaurus, has been posited as circumstantial evidence of this placement.[11] On the other hand, the analysis of a study on ornithischian phylogeny by P. E. Dieudonné and colleagues in 2021 found Laquintasaura not as a thyreophoran but in a more primitive position outside of the clade Genasauria.[12] The cladogram from Baron et al. (2017) is shown below on the left, and that of Dieudonné et al. (2021) is shown on the below right. Clade names have been inserted based on definitions established by a paper by Daniel Madzia and colleagues in 2021 for clarity.[9][12][13]

Ornithischia

Palaeoecology

Arrangement of the continents are the time Laquintasaura lived, 200 million years ago; as today, Venezuela was at the time in the northern hemisphere near the equator

Laquintasaura hails from the La Quinta Formation of northern South America, in what is now Colombia and Venezuela, and was found in the Venezuelan part of the formation.

end-Triassic extinction indicates ornithischians achieved quick expansion in diversity and distribution, its conservative anatomy indicates that increases in body size and anatomical specialization did not occur until later in the Jurassic.[3]

Skull of Lesothosaurus, another early ornithischian; it may have shared omnivorous behaviour with Laquintasaura lost in later relatives

The ecosystem that Laquintasaura lived in is thought to represent an

iguanodontians.[20]

The exact nature of the taphonomy of the Laquintasaura bonebed remains incompletely studied. The remains are thought to have undergone some degree of low-energy transport, but the lack of any damage to the bones, or signs of things like plant root damage or insect boring holes, indicating the remains were not exposed for a long time prior to being buried.[3] The bonebed is entirely devoid of microfossils, invertebrates, or plant remains, and is palynologically barren; the only other animal found at the site is the scant remains of Tachiraptor.[2][3] All of this indicates the four or more individuals at the site likely died together and maybe have lived together in life, indicative of social behaviour. Herding is known in ornithischians of the Late Jurassic and Cretaceous, but its presence in Laquintasaura would be the first recognized in such an early member of the group (though more recent research has also indicated presence in the genus Lesothosaurus[11]).[3]

References