Pomerania during the High Middle Ages
The examples and perspective in this article may not include all significant viewpoints. (April 2011) |
History of Pomerania |
---|
Poland portal Germany portal |
Pomerania during the High Middle Ages covers the history of Pomerania in the 12th and 13th centuries.
The early 12th century
The
Starting in the High Middle Ages, a large influx of German settlers and the introduction of German law, custom, and
The
(Kammin, Kamień Pomorski).Obodrite realm (1093-1128)
After the
As part of Polish realm (1102/22–1138)
In several expeditions mounted between 1102[11] and 1121,[12] most of Pomerania had been acquired by the Polish duke Bolesław III Wrymouth.[13]
From 1102 to 1109, Boleslaw campaigned in the Noteć (Netze) and Parsęta (Persante) area.[14] The Pomeranian residence in Białogard (Belgard) was taken already in 1102.[13] From 1112 to 1116, Boleslaw took all of Pomerelia.[14] From 1119 to 1122, the area towards the Oder was acquired.[14] Szczecin (Stettin) was taken in the winter of 1121/1122.[14]
The conquest resulted in a high death toll and devastation of vast areas of Pomerania, and the Pomeranian dukes became vassals of Boleslaw III of Poland.[2][3][4] Deportations of Pomeranians to Poland took place.[12][15][clarification needed] The terms of surrender after the Polish conquest were that Wartislaw had to accept Polish sovereignty, convert his people to Christianity, and pay an annual tribute to the Polish duke.[3]
The Annals of Traska report that "Boleslaw III crossed the sea and captured castles."[16] The currently prevailing view is that this mention refers to a campaign in Pomerania, but proposed targets also include the Levant, Denmark[17] and Öland.[18] In Pomerania, Boleslaw's targets may have been Rügen/Rugia, Wolin/Wollin or Stettin/Szczecin.[17][19]
Emergence of Pomeranian dynasties - Samborides and Griffins
Pomerelia, initially under Polish control, was ruled by the Samborides dynasty from 1227 until 1294.[1] The duchy was split temporarily[when?] into districts of Gdańsk (Danzig), Białogard, Świecie (Schwetz) and Lubieszewo–Tczew .
In
The areas stretching from
Conversion of Pomerania
The first attempt to convert the
After Bernard's misfortune, Boleslaw III asked Otto of Bamberg[24] to convert Pomerania to Christianity, which he accomplished in his first visit in 1124/25.[25] Otto's strategy severely differed from the one Bernard used: While Bernard travelled alone and as a poor and unknown priest, Otto, a wealthy and famous man, was accompanied by 20 clergy of his own diocese, numerous servants, 60 warriors supplied to him by Boleslaw, and carried with him numerous supplies and gifts. After arriving in Pyritz (Pyrzyce), the Pomeranians were assured that Otto's aim was not the gain of wealth at the expense of the Pomeranian people, as he was wealthy already, but only to convert them to Christianity, which would protect the Pomeranians from further punishment by God, as which the devastating Polish conquest was depicted. This approach turned out to be successful, and was backed by parts of the Pomeranian nobility that in part was Christian raised already, like duke Wartislaw, who encouraged and promoted Otto's mission. Many Pomeranians were baptized already in Pyritz and also in the other burghs visited.[3][26][27][28][29]
At this first mission, Otto founded at least eleven churches, two of those each in Szczecin and Wolin.[30]
Otto of Bamberg returned in 1128,
Holy Roman Emperor Lothair claimed the areas west of the
Adalbert of Pomerania, the later Pomeranian bishop, participated in Otto's mission as an interpreter and assistant.[34][35]
Fate of the pagan priesthood
The priests of the numerous gods worshipped before the conversion were one of the most powerful class in the early medieval society. Their reaction to the
Pomeranian diocese (1140)
On Otto of Bamberg's behalf, a
After ongoing Danish raids, Wollin was destroyed, and the see of the diocese was shifted across the Dziwna to Kamień Pomorski's St John's church in 1176. This was confirmed by the pope in 1186. In the early 13th century, the Cammin diocese along with the Pomeranian dukes gained control over Circipania. Also, the bishops managed to gain direct control over a territory around Kolobrzeg and Koszalin.
The Pomerelian areas were integrated into the
After the successful conversion of the nobility, monasteries were set up on vast areas granted by local dukes both to further implement Christian faith and to develop the land. The monasteries actively took part in the Ostsiedlung.[28][36] Most of the clergy originated in Germany, some in Poland, and since the mid-12th century also from Denmark.[37]
Wendish Crusade (1147)
In 1147, the
Partition of 1155 - Pomerania-Demmin and Pomerania-Stettin
Westward expansion of Wartislaw I
In the meantime, Wartislaw managed to conquer territories west of the
The major stage of the westward expansion into Lutici territory occurred between Otto of Bamberg's two missions, 1124 and 1128. In 1128, Demmin, the County of Gützkow and Wolgast were already incorporated into Wartislaw I's realm, yet warfare was still going on.[43] Captured Lutici and other war loot, including livestock, money, and clothes were apportioned among the victorious.[44] After Wartislaw's Lutician conquests, his duchy lay between the Bay of Greifswald to the north, Circipania, including Güstrow, to the west, Kolberg/Kołobrzeg in the east, and possibly as far as the Havel and Spree rivers in the south.[45]
After the conquests, Wartislaw's realm stretched from the Bay of Greifswald in the North and Circipania with Güstrow in the West to the Havel and possibly also the Spree rivers in the South and the Kolobrzeg area in the east.[45]
These gains were not subject to Polish over lordship,
Society under Wartislaw I
During Wartislaw I's rule society was composed of the Pomeranian freeman and the slaves, who consisted mostly of Wendish, German or Danish war captives. The freemen generally made their living from agriculture, fishing and husbandry, as well as hunting and trade.[44][51] Their social status depended both on accumulated wealth as well as noble status. The proportion of slaves in the total population of the area was relatively small and in fact the Pomeranians exported slaves to Poland.[44][51]
The largest settlements were Wollin (Wolin) and Stettin (Szczecin), each of which had a few thousand inhabitants, and a biweekly market day.[52] While some historians address these settlements as towns, this is rejected by others due to the differences to later towns. They are usually referred to as early towns, proto-towns, castle towns or emporia; their Slavic designation was *grod (gard in Pomeranian and Polabian language).[nb 1] The population of Pomerania was relatively wealthy in comparison to her neighbors, owing to abundant land, inter-regional trade and piracy.[52]
Wartislaw's power and standing differed depending on the area. In the east of his duchy (
In 1134, Pomeranian troops invaded Denmark and even looted Roskilde, then the Danish capital.[54] In 1135, Norwegian Konghelle was attacked and sacked.[54]
Saxon conquest (1164)
In the West, bishops and dukes of the Holy Roman Empire mounted expeditions to Pomerania. Most notable for the further fate of Pomerania are the 1147 Wendish Crusade and the 1164 Battle of Verchen, the Pomeranian dukes became vassals of Henry the Lion, of Saxony.[38] Circipania came under control of the Pomeranian dukes at about this time. Despite this vassalage, Henry again sieged Demmin in 1177 when he allied with the Danes, but reconciled with the Pomeranian dukes thereafter.[55]
Holy Roman Empire (1181)
After the 1147
At that time, the duchy was also referred to as Slavinia (German: Slawien) (yet this was a term applied to several Wendish areas such as Mecklenburg and the Principality of Rügen). The duchy remained in the Empire, although Denmark managed to take control of the southern Baltic including the Duchy of Pomerania from the 1180s until the 1227 Battle of Bornhöved.
Danish conquests (1168–1185)
From the North, Denmark attacked Pomerania. Several campaigns throughout the 12th century (in 1136, 1150, 1159 and throughout the 1160s) culminated in the defeat of the
Conquest and conversion of the Rugian principality (1168)
The island of
Danish conquest of all Pomerania (1170–1185)
When the Rugian princes became vassals of Valdemar I of Denmark in 1168, the Saxon-Danish alliance broke apart.[38]
In the fall of 1170, the Danes raided the
In 1184,
In 1184 and 1185, three campaigns of the Danes resulted in making
Society in the late 12th and early 13th centuries
While in the early 12th century most of the Pomeranians were free, by the late 12th century only the nobility and knights remained free. They were free in their decisions concerning their property and actions, though formally they had to apply for the duke's support.[59]
The class of the unfree still consisted of prisoners of war, but additionally one became unfree after conviction of a major criminal offense or if one was unable to pay one's debts. The unfree made up for an estimated 15% of the population and primarily had to work on the lands of the free.[59]
Most of the population of this time was largely dependent on the duke. This dependency could also result in becoming dependent on a person other than the duke, if the duke granted parts of his lands including the population thereon to a noble, a church, or a monastery. This class shared certain obligations and restrictions with the unfree, for example a
Their major obligations were participation in the duke's military campaigns, defense of the duchy, erection and maintenance of the ducal buildings (burghs, courts, bridges), to hand over horses, oxen, and carriages to the duke or his officials on demand, to host and to cater the duke or his officials on demand, to supply rations for the duke's journeys, a periodic tribute in form of a fixed amount of meat and wheat, and also a church tax ("biskopownica", since 1170 "Garbenzehnt").[36]
German settlement
Beginning in the 12th century, on the initiative of monasteries,[60] as well as the local nobility, German settlers began migrating to Pomerania in a process later termed the Ostsiedlung. The local nobles and rulers encouraged the settlement in order to strengthen and consolidate their position and to develop and intensify land use, while the settlers were attracted by the privileges that were granted to them.[61]
Through a process that spanned three hundred years, in western Pomerania the local Slavic population was mostly assimilated, while in the eastern part, Slavic Kashubians and Slovincians held on to their ethnic culture and identity.
Rural settlement
Before the Ostsiedlung, Pomerania was rather sparsely settled. Around 1200, a relatively dense population could be found on the islands of
The first German and Danish settlers arrived since the 1170s and settled in the
Significant German settlement started in the first half of the 13th century. Ostsiedlung was a common process at this time in all Central Europe and was largely run by the nobles and monasteries to increase their income. Also, the settlers were expected to finish and secure the conversion of the non-nobles to Christianity. In addition, the Danes withdrew from most of Pomerania in 1227, leaving the duchy vulnerable to their expansive neighbors, especially
Besides the
Foundation of towns
Before the Ostsiedlung, urban settlements of the emporia[
Important changes connected to Ostsiedlung included
- location:[71][72] All Ostsiedlung towns in Pomerania except for Stettin, Wollin and probably Kammin were founded on empty space, even if they were located near Slavic settlements.[73] Piskorski (1997) says that for the towns with a Slavic predecessor, "usually, the settlement from the west did not only mean granting German law and a new administration, but also the shift of the old settlement location, because the new German-law town emerged not at the place, but in the vicinity of the old center, whereby sometimes the distance between them was several kilometers as e.g. in the case of Pomeranian Kolberg." By leaving the Slavic settlement untouched, the landlord not only avoided dealing with complicated property rights inside, but also kept the services and income generated by its dependent population. Piskorski also says there were isolated exceptions as in the case of Stettin and Wollin, where pre-existing settlements were integrated into the new town: "In such cases, the old settlements were surveyed anew and built anew."[71] Benl (1999) likewise says that Wollin/Wolin and probably Kammin/Kamień Pomorski were exceptional in that they were built on the spot of former, yet decayed settlements, and that Stettin was exceptional in that two German settlements, set up close to the Slavic castle and settlement, were included in the later town.[74] Likewise, Mangelsdorf (1990) says that the cities in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern "have their roots in the slavonic period, and usually came up near a slavonic castle or settlement with a commercial background." Mangelsdorf further says that "new in-town excavations illustrate the connection between slavonic and german settlements and the influence of material culture. [...] Slavic material culture, especially pottery, died [...] in Mecklenburg-Antepomerania at the end of the 13th century."[75]
- population:[72] Germans formed a majority in the towns from the beginning.[76] They moved in either directly from the West or from the surrounding areas.[76] People of Slavic descent also lived in the towns, but primarily in suburbs (Wieken) outside the walls, which were either continuations of pre-existing Slavic settlements (many of those were soon abandoned) or new foundations owned by the landlord.[76] Since around 1300, the towns acquired these Wieken.[76] A small number of Jews also settled in medieval Pomeranian towns.[77]
- legal status:[71][72] Prior to the Ostsiedlung, all inhabitants of the duchy were subject to ducal law, meaning that distinct sets of laws were applied to individuums according to their descent, regardless whether they lived in large or small settlements.[71] In contrast, German town law was granted to the inhabitants of Ostsiedlung towns, making their inhabitants personally free and subject to the town's jurisdiction.[71] This however did not apply to resident clergymen and vassals of the duke.[78] Many towns were able to expand the privileges and freedoms gained by their foundation in the following years.[78]
- social differentiation:[71] The upper class in the Ostsiedlung towns were the patricians, who were primarily occupied with long-distance trade and dominated the town's council.[77]
- layout:[71][79] The towns were set up with regular streets resembling a checkerboard-like pattern.[79] The shape of the town was either oval (e.g. Bahn), rectangular with rounded corners (e.g. Greifenhagen) or rectangular (e.g. Treptow); Altdamm was built in a circular and Pyritz in a triangular shape.[79] In the center was the market place with the townhall.[79]
Between 1234 and 1299, 34 towns
According to Rădvan (2010), "a relevant example for how towns were founded (civitas libera) is Prenzlau today within German boundaries, close to Poland. It was here that, a short distance from an older Slavic settlement, duke Barnim I of Pomerania entrusted in 1234-35 the creation of a new settlement to eight contractors (referred to as fondatores) originating from Stendal, Saxony. The eight, who were probably relatives to some degree, were granted 300 Hufen (around 4800 ha) that were to be distributed to settlers, each one of the fondatores being entitled to 160 ha for himself and the right to build mills; one of them became the duke's representative. The settlers' land grant was tax exempt for three years, and it was to be kept in eternal and hereditary possession. A 1.5 km (1 mi) perimeter around the settlement was provided for unrestricted use by the community of pastures, forests, or fishing. Those trading were dispensed of paying taxes for land under ducal authority. Without being mentioned in the founding act, the old Slavic community persisted as nothing more that a suburb to the new town. Aside from several topical variations, many settlements in medieval Poland and other areas followed a similar pattern."[84]
Many towns with a gard in close proximity had the duke level the castle when they grew in power. Stettin, where the castle was inside the town, had the duke level it already in 1249,[85] other towns were to follow. The fortified new towns had succeeded the gards as strongholds for the country's defense. In many cases, the former Slavic settlement would become a suburb of the German town ("Wiek", "Wieck"). In Stettin, two "Wiek" suburbs were set up anew outside the walls, to which most Slavs from within the walls were resettled. Such Wiek settlements did initially not belong to the town, but to the duke, although they were likely to come into possession of the town in the course of the 14th century. Also in the 14th century, Slavic Wiek suburbs lost their Slavic character.[86]
In western Pomerania, including Rugia, the process of Ostsiedlung differed from how it took place in other parts of Eastern Europe in that a high proportion of the settlers was composed of
Wampen, Ladebow, and other villages near Greifswald are of Danish origin.[88] Yet, many Scandinavian settlers in the Pomeranian towns were of German origin, moving from older German merchants' settlements in Sweden to the newly founded towns at the Southern Baltic shore.[89]
Territorial changes in the 13th century
War with Brandenburg
During the reign of
Between 1185 and 1227, Pomerania along with most of the southern Baltic coast remained under sovereignty of Denmark. However, Brandenburg again tried to gain sovereignty over Pomerania, and in 1214 for a short time conquered
At this time, the
Denmark also attempted to restore her rule and took Wolgast and Demmin in 1235, but was driven out the same year.[94] Wartislaw had to accept Brandenburg's overlordship in the 1236 Treaty of Kremmen, furthermore he had to hand over most of his duchy to Brandenburg immediately, that was the Burg Stargard Land and adjacted areas (all soon to become a part of Mecklenburg, forming the bulk of the later Mecklenburg-Strelitz area). Circipania was already lost to Mecklenburg in the years before.
In the 1250 Treaty of Landin between Pomeranian dukes and margraves of Brandenburg, Barnim I managed to reassert the rule of his Griffin house over Pomerania, but lost the Uckermark to Brandenburg.
Brandenburg since 1250 expanded eastward. In 1250/52, the margraves gained half of
In 1264, Duke
In 1269, Barnim lost the terra
Bogislaw IV lost the
War with Silesia
In 1234 and 1241,
Competition for Schlawe-Stolp
The last member of the Ratiborides branch of the Griffins,
When the area became incorporated into the Pomerelian duchy, the
Notes
- ^ ISBN 978-3-8305-0378-1. Cf. also Benl, R, in Buchholz (1999), p. 75.
References
- ^ a b c d Krause (1997), p.40
- ^ a b Addison (2003), pp.57ff
- ^ a b c d e f Buchholz (1999), p.25
- ^ a b Herrmann (1985), pp.384ff
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Buchholz (1999), p.87
- ^ [1] Pomorze słowiańskie, Pomorze germańskie, Biuletyn Ministra Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego
- ^ a b c d e f Herrmann (1985), p.379
- ^ Herrmann (1985), p.367
- ^ a b c d Herrmann (1985), p.268
- ^ Herrmann (1985), p.381
- ^ Richard Roepell: Geschichte Polens, vol. I. Hamburg 1840, p. 229 ff. (in German)
- ^ a b Richard Roepell: Geschichte Polens, vol. I, Hamburg 1840, pp. 267-268 (in German)
- ^ a b Piskorski (1999), p.35
- ^ a b c d e Piskorski (1999), p.36
- ^ Heitz (1995), p.158
- ISBN 9789004141223.)
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link - ^ ISBN 978-9004185517.)
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link - ^ Blomkvist, Nils (2005). The Discovery of the Baltic. The Reception of a Catholic World-System in the European North (a.d. 1075–1225). The Northern World. Vol. 15. Leiden. p. 332.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - ISBN 9789004141223.)
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link): "In Polish research many suggestions have been made, from a mere crossing over Stettiner Bucht, to an assault on Rügen. Tyc [...] states that the objective of Boleslaus' navigation remains unknown," referring to Tyc, Teodor (1997). Z średniowiecznych dziejów Wielkopolski i Pomorza: wybór prac. Zebrał i posłowiem opatrzył Jan M Piskorski. Poznań. pp. 206ff.{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link - ^ a b c Inachin (2008), p.17
- ^ a b Herrmann (1985), pp.386
- ^ Norman Davies, "God's Playground", Columbia University Press, 2005, pg 69
- ^ Maclear (1969), pp.218ff
- ^ Medley (2004), p.152
- ^ a b c d e f g Krause (1997), p.40ff
- ^ Addison (2003), pp.59ff
- ^ a b Palmer (2005), pp.107ff
- ^ a b c d e Herrmann (1985), pp.402ff
- ^ Piskorski (1999), pp.36ff
- ^ Piskorski (1999), p.39
- ^ a b c d Piskorski (1999), p.40
- ^ Buchholz (1999), p.26
- ^ Buchholz (1999), p.28
- ^ a b c Buchholz (1999), p.29
- ^ a b Piskorski (1999), p.47
- ^ a b Piskorski (1999), p.56
- ^ Piskorski (1999), pp.54,55
- ^ a b c d Piskorski (1999), p.43
- ^ Buchholz (1999), p.31
- ^ Herrmann (1985), pp.388ff
- ^ Piskorski (1999), pp.41,42
- ISBN 978-83-11-10737-3.
- ^ Piskorski (1999), pp. 40,41
- ^ a b c Herrmann (1985), p.141
- ^ a b Piskorski (1999), p.41
- ^ a b c Buske (1997), p.11
- ^ Historia Szczecina: zarys dziejów miasta od czasów najdawniejszych do 1980, Tadeusz Białecki, page 53 Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, 1992 -
- ^ Buske (1997), p.11 :"Durch die Eroberung des Peenegebiets, das nicht zum polnischen Einflußgebiet gehörte, gewann Wartislaw [..] eine beachtliche Selbstständigkeit. Er konnte sich schließlich dauerhaft gegen Polen behaupten [..]"
- ^ a b Buske (1997), p.10
- ^ Buske (1997), pp.11,12
- ^ a b Piskorski (1999), pp.51,54
- ^ a b Piskorski (1999), p.54
- ^ Piskorski (1999), pp.50,51
- ^ a b c d e f Piskorski (1999), p.44
- ^ Buchholz (1999), pp.30,34
- ^ a b Buchholz (1999), p.34
- ^ a b Herrmann (1985), pp.394ff
- ^ a b Buchholz (1999), pp.34,35
- ^ a b c Piskorski (1999), p.55
- ^ Piskorski (1999), p.76
- ^ Buchholz (1999), p.17
- ^ Buchholz (1999), pp.43-48
- ^ Piskorski (1999), p.77
- ^ Buchholz (1999), pp.46-52
- ^ Piskorski (2007), p.86
- ^ An historical geography of Europe, 450 B.C.-A.D.1330, Norman John Greville Pounds, Cambridge University Press 1973, page 241, "By 1121 Polish armies had penetrated its forests, captured its chief city of Szczecin"
- ^ Archeologia Polski, Volume 38, Instytut Historii Kultury Materialnej (Polska Akademia Nauk, page 309, Zakład im. Ossolińskich, 1993
- ^ Herrmann (1985), pp.237ff, 244ff, 269ff
- ^ Dollinger, P. (1999): The German Hansa. Routledge. p. 16.
- ^ Piskorski (1999), p. 55.
- ^ a b c d e f g Piskorski (1997), pp. 194-203
- ^ a b c Benl, R. in Buchholz et al. (1999), p. 80.
- ^ Benl, R. in Buchholz et al. (1999), p. 80: "Die deutschen Städte Pommerns, auch die kleineren, sind auf bis dahin unbesiedeltem Gelände gegründet worden, auch wenn größere oder kleinere slawische Siedlungen beziehungsweise Burgen [...] in der Nähe bereits bestanden.
- ^ Buchholz (1999), pp.75,79-80
- ^ V European symposium for teachers of medieval archaeology: Sevilla-Córdoba 29 September - 2 October 1999 Universidad de Sevilla, The development of medieval archaeology in East Germany since 1990, Gunter Mangelsdorf, page 61
- ^ a b c d Benl, R. in Buchholz et al. (1999), p. 84.
- ^ a b Benl, R. in Buchholz et al. (1999), p. 85.
- ^ a b Benl, R. in Buchholz et al. (1999), p. 83.
- ^ a b c d Benl, R. in Buchholz et al. (1999), p. 86.
- ^ a b c Inachin (2008), p. 26
- ^ Buske (1997), pp. 38-39.
- ^ Piskorski (1997) and (1999), p. 66; Inachin (2008), p. 25, Buchholz et al (1999), p. 75; Buske (1997), p. 38
- ^ Buchholz (1999), pp.77-80
- ^ Rădvan (2010), pp. 32-33.
- ^ Herrmann (1985), p.426
- ^ Buchholz (1999), pp.84,85
- ^ Piskorski (2007), pp. 76ff
- ^ Wernicke (2000), p.25
- ^ Wernicke (2000), p.34
- ^ Piskorski (1999), p.45
- ^ Inachin (2008), p.18
- ^ Inachin (2008), pp.18-19
- ^ Buske (1997), p.18
- ^ Buchholz (1999), p.88
- ^ a b Buchholz (1999), p.89
- ^ a b Buchholz (1999), p.90
- ^ a b Zientara (2002), p.338
- ^ a b c d e Inachin (2008), p.19
Bibliography
- Buchholz, Werner, ed. (1999). Pommern (in German). Siedler. ISBN 3-88680-272-8.
- Buske, Norbert (1997). Pommern (in German). Schwerin: Helms. ISBN 3-931185-07-9.
- Addison, James Thayer (2003). Medieval Missionary: A Study of the Conversion of Northern Europe Ad 500 to 1300. Kessinger Publishing. ISBN 0-7661-7567-7.
- Heitz, Gerhard; Rischer, Henning (1995). Geschichte in Daten. Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (in German). Münster-Berlin: Koehler&Amelang. ISBN 3-7338-0195-4.
- Herrmann, Joachim (1985). Die Slawen in Deutschland (in German). Berlin: Akademie-Verlag. ISBN 3-515-07671-9.
- ISBN 978-3-356-01044-2.
- Krause, Gerhard; Balz, Horst Robert; Müller, Gerhard (1997). Theologische Realenzyklopädie (in German). Walter de Gruyter. ISBN 3-11-015435-8.
- Maclear, George Frederick (1969). Apostles of Mediaeval Europe. Ayer Publishing. ISBN 0-8369-2803-2.
- Medley, D. J. (2004). The church and the empire. Kessinger Publishing. ISBN 1-4191-5673-X.
- Palmer, William (2005). A Compendioius Ecclesiastical History from the Earliest Period to the Present Time. Kessinger Publishing. ISBN 1-4179-8323-X.
- Piskorski, Jan Maria (1997). "Die mittelalterliche Ostsiedlung - ein alter Streit und neue Ergebnisse". In Seibt; et al. (eds.). Transit Brügge-Novgorod. Eine Straße durch die europäische Geschichte. Essen. pp. 194–203.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - Piskorski, Jan Maria (1999). Pommern im Wandel der Zeiten (in German). Zamek Ksiazat Pomorskich. OCLC 43087092.
- Piskorski, Jan Maria (2007). "Slawen und Deutsche in Pommern im Mittelalter". In Herbers, Klaus; Jaspert, Nikolas (eds.). Grenzräume und Grenzüberschreitungen im Vergleich: der Osten und der Westen des mittelalterlichen Lateineuropa (in German). Akademie Verlag. ISBN 978-3-05-004155-1.
- Sommerfeld, Wilhelm von (2005). Geschichte der Germanisierung des Herzogtums Pommern oder Slavien bis zum Ablauf des 13. Jahrhunderts (in German). Adamant Media Corporation (unabridged facsimile of the edition published by Duncker & Humblot, Leipzig 1896). )
- Wernicke, Horst (2000). Greifswald:Geschichte der Stadt (in German). Helms. ISBN 3-931185-56-7.
- Zientara, Benedykt; Smolka, Stanisław; ISBN 3-486-56615-6.