Shaken baby syndrome

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Shaken baby syndrome
Other namesabusive head trauma, non-accidental head injury, non-accidental trauma
cognitive impairment[2][1]
Usual onsetLess than 5 years old[3]
CausesBlunt trauma, vigorous shaking[1]
Diagnostic methodCT scan[1]
PreventionEducating new parents[1]
PrognosisLong term health problems common[3]
Frequency3 per 10,000 babies per year (US)[1]
Deaths≈25% risk of death[3]

Shaken baby syndrome (SBS), also known as abusive head trauma (AHT), is a medical condition in children younger than five years old,

long bones, and subdural hematomas (bleeding in the brain).[5]

The condition is often caused as a result of a parent or caregiver becoming frustrated due to the child crying.[3] Diagnosis can be difficult as symptoms may be nonspecific.[1] A CT scan of the head is typically recommended if a concern is present.[1] If there are concerning findings on the CT scan, a full work-up for child abuse should occur, including an eye exam and skeletal survey. Retinal hemorrhage is highly associated with AHT, occurring in 78% of cases of AHT versus 5% of cases of non-abusive head trauma.[6][7]

Diagnosing the syndrome has proven to be both challenging and contentious for medical professionals because objective witnesses to the initial trauma are generally unavailable.

cognitive impairment, and death.[2][1]

Educating new parents appears to be beneficial in decreasing rates of the condition.[1] SBS is estimated to occur in three to four per 10,000 babies a year.[1] These signs have evolved through the years as accepted and recognized signs of child abuse. Medical professionals strongly suspect shaking as the cause of injuries when a young child presents with retinal bleed, fractures, soft tissue injuries, or subdural hematoma that cannot be explained by accidental trauma or other medical conditions.[11]

Retinal hemorrhage (bleeding) occurs in around 85% of SBS cases and the severity of retinal hemorrhage correlates with severity of head injury.[6] The type of retinal bleeds are often believed to be particularly characteristic of this condition, making the finding useful in establishing the diagnosis.[12]

Fractures of the

cortical bone are tightly bound together) and "bones on both the proximal and distal sides of a single joint are affected, especially at the knee".[14]

Infants may display irritability,

fontanels (the soft spots on a baby's head), increased size of the head, altered breathing, and dilated pupils
.

Risk factors

Caregivers that are at risk for becoming abusive often have unrealistic expectations of the child and may display "role reversal", expecting the child to fulfill the needs of the caregiver.[15] Substance abuse and emotional stress, resulting for example from financial troubles, are other risk factors for aggression and impulsiveness in caregivers.[15] Caregivers of any gender can cause SBS.[15] Although it had been previously speculated that SBS was an isolated event, evidence of prior child abuse is a common finding.[15] In an estimated 33–40% of cases, evidence of prior head injuries, such as old intracranial bleeds, is present.[15]

Mechanism

Effects of SBS are thought to be

oxygen deprivation and swelling of the brain,[16] which can raise pressure inside the skull
and damage delicate brain tissue, although witnessed shaking events have not led to such injuries.

Traumatic shaking occurs when a child is shaken in such a way that its head is flung backwards and forwards.[17] In 1971, Guthkelch, a neurosurgeon, hypothesized that such shaking can result in a subdural hematoma, in the absence of any detectable external signs of injury to the skull.[17] The article describes two cases in which the parents admitted that for various reasons they had shaken the child before it became ill.[17] Moreover, one of the babies had retinal hemorrhages.[17] The association between traumatic shaking, subdural hematoma and retinal hemorrhages was described in 1972 and referred to as whiplash shaken infant syndrome.[17] The injuries were believed to occur because shaking the child subjected the head to acceleration–deceleration and rotational forces.[17]

Force

There has been controversy regarding the amount of force required to produce the brain damage seen in SBS. There is broad agreement, even amongst skeptics, that shaking of a baby is dangerous and can be fatal.[18][19][20]

A biomechanical analysis by F. A. Bandak published in 2005 reported that "forceful shaking can severely injure or kill an infant, this is because the cervical spine would be severely injured and not because subdural hematomas would be caused by high head rotational accelerations... an infant head subjected to the levels of rotational velocity and acceleration called for in the SBS literature, would experience forces on the infant neck far exceeding the limits for structural failure of the cervical spine. Furthermore, shaking cervical spine injury can occur at much lower levels of head velocity and acceleration than those reported for SBS."[21] Other authors were critical of the mathematical analysis by Bandak, citing concerns about the calculations the author used concluding "In light of the numerical errors in Bandak's neck force estimations, we question the resolute tenor of Bandak's conclusions that neck injuries would occur in all shaking events."[22] Other authors critical of the model proposed by Bandak concluding "the mechanical analogue proposed in the paper may not be entirely appropriate when used to model the motion of the head and neck of infants when a baby is shaken."[23] Bandak responded to the criticism in a letter to the editor published in Forensic Science International in February 2006.[24]

Diagnosis

Diagnosis can be difficult as symptoms may be nonspecific.

subdural haematoma, retinal hemorrhages, and encephalopathy are alone at making the diagnosis.[25]

  • A skull fracture from abusive head trauma in an infant
    A skull fracture from abusive head trauma in an infant
  • 3D CT reconstruction showing a skull fracture in an infant
    3D CT reconstruction showing a skull fracture in an infant
  • 3D CT reconstruction showing a skull fracture in an infant
    3D CT reconstruction showing a skull fracture in an infant

Triad

While the findings of SBS are complex and many,

retinal hemorrhages, subdural hematomas, and encephalopathy.[27]

SBS may be misdiagnosed, underdiagnosed, and overdiagnosed,

cerebral bleed or atrophy, hydrocephalus, and papilledema (swelling of the optic disc).[16]

The terms non-accidental head injury or inflicted traumatic brain injury have been used in place of "abusive head trauma" or "SBS".[33]

Classification

The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention identifies SBS as "an injury to the skull or intracranial contents of an infant or young child (< 5 years of age) due to inflicted blunt impact and/or violent shaking".[34] In 2009, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommended the use of the term abusive head trauma (AHT) to replace SBS, in part to differentiate injuries arising solely from shaking and injuries arising from shaking as well as trauma to the head.[35]

The Crown Prosecution Service for England and Wales recommended in 2011 that the term shaken baby syndrome be avoided and the term non accidental head injury (NAHI) be used instead.[36]

Differential diagnosis

Vitamin C deficiency

Some authors have suggested that certain cases of suspected shaken baby syndrome may result from vitamin C deficiency.[37][38][39] This contested hypothesis is based upon a speculated marginal, near scorbutic condition or lack of essential nutrient(s) repletion and a potential elevated histamine level. However, symptoms consistent with increased histamine levels, such as low blood pressure and allergic symptoms, are not commonly associated with scurvy as clinically significant vitamin C deficiency. A literature review of this hypothesis in the journal Pediatrics International concluded the following: "From the available information in the literature, concluded that there was no convincing evidence to conclude that vitamin C deficiency can be considered to be a cause of shaken baby syndrome."[40]

The proponents of such hypotheses often question the adequacy of nutrient tissue levels, especially vitamin C,

sudden infant death syndrome have been reported, and scurvy typically occurs later in infancy, rarely causes death or intracranial bleeding, and is accompanied by other changes of the bones and skin and invariably an unusually deficient dietary history.[45][46]

In one study vaccination was shown not associated with retinal hemorrhages.[47]

Gestational problems

Gestational problems affecting both mother and fetus, the birthing process, prematurity and nutritional deficits can accelerate skeletal and hemorrhagic pathologies that can also mimic SBS, even before birth.[48][49][50][51][verification needed]

Prevention

Interventions by neonatal nurses include giving parents information about abusive head trauma, normal infant crying and reasons for crying, teaching how to calm an infant, and how to cope if the infant was inconsolable may reduce rates of SBS.[52]

Treatment

Treatment involves monitoring

intracranial hematoma is present, to drain the blood collection.[16][1]

Prognosis

Prognosis depends on severity and can range from total recovery to severe disability to death when the injury is severe.[16] One third of these patients die, one third survives with a major neurological condition, and only one third survives in good condition; therefore shaken baby syndrome puts children at risk of long-term disability.[53][54] The most frequent neurological impairments are learning disabilities, seizure disorders, speech disabilities, hydrocephalus, cerebral palsy, and visual disorders.[31]

Epidemiology

Small children are at particularly high risk for the abuse that causes SBS given the large difference in size between the small child and an adult.[15] SBS usually occurs in children under the age of two but may occur in those up to age five.[15] In the US, deaths due to SBS constitute about 10% of deaths due to child abuse.[55]

History

In 1971,

computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging techniques in the 1970s and 1980s advanced the ability to diagnose the syndrome.[15]

Legal issues

The association of diagnosed SBS with deliberate assault is a matter of legal and medical contention, with conflicting opinions as to whether one necessarily implies the other.

The

President's Council of Advisers on Science and Technology (PCAST) noted in its September 2016 report that there are concerns regarding the scientific validity of forensic evidence of abusive head trauma that "require urgent attention".[60] Similarly, the Maguire model, suggested in 2011 as a potential statistical model for determining the probability that a child's trauma was caused by abuse, has been questioned.[61] A proposed clinical prediction rule with high sensitivity and low specificity, to rule out Abusive Head Trauma, has been published.[62]

In July 2005, the Court of Appeal of England and Wales heard four appeals of SBS convictions: one case was dropped, the sentence was reduced for one, and two convictions were upheld.[63] The court found that the classic triad of retinal bleeding, subdural hematoma, and acute encephalopathy are not 100% diagnostic of SBS and that clinical history is also important. In the Court's ruling, they upheld the clinical concept of SBS but dismissed one case and reduced another from murder to manslaughter.[63] In their words: "Whilst a strong pointer to NAHI [non-accidental head injury] on its own we do not think it possible to find that it must automatically and necessarily lead to a diagnosis of NAHI. All the circumstances, including the clinical picture, must be taken into account."[64]

The court did not believe the "unified hypothesis", proposed by British physician J. F. Geddes and colleagues, as an alternative mechanism for the subdural and retinal bleeding found in suspected cases of SBS.

hypoxia, increased intracranial pressure, and increased pressure in the brain's blood vessels.[63] The court reported that "the unified hypothesis [could] no longer be regarded as a credible or alternative cause of the triad of injuries": subdural haemorrhage, retinal bleeding and encephalopathy due to hypoxemia (low blood oxygen) found in suspected SBS.[63]

On 31 January 2008, the Wisconsin Court of Appeals granted Audrey A. Edmunds a new trial based on "competing credible medical opinions in determining whether there is a reasonable doubt as to Edmunds's guilt." Specifically, the appeals court found that "Edmunds presented evidence that was not discovered until after her conviction, in the form of expert medical testimony, that a significant and legitimate debate in the medical community has developed in the past ten years over whether infants can be fatally injured through shaking alone, whether an infant may suffer head trauma and yet experience a significant lucid interval prior to death, and whether other causes may mimic the symptoms traditionally viewed as indicating shaken baby or shaken impact syndrome."[65][66]

In 2012, Norman Guthkelch, the neurosurgeon often credited with "discovering" the diagnosis of SBS,[67] published an article "after 40 years of consideration," which is harshly critical of shaken baby prosecutions based solely on the triad of injuries.[68] Again, in 2012, Guthkelch stated in an interview, "I think we need to go back to the drawing board and make a more thorough assessment of these fatal cases, and I am going to bet ... that we are going to find in every – or at least the large majority of cases, the child had another severe illness of some sort which was missed until too late."[69] Furthermore, in 2015, Guthkelch went so far as to say, "I was against defining this thing as a syndrome in the first instance. To go on and say every time you see it, it's a crime... It became an easy way to go into jail."[70]

Teri Covington, who runs the National Center for Child Death Review Policy and Practice, worries that such caution has led to a growing number of cases of child abuse in which the abuser is not punished.[67]

In March 2016, Waney Squier, a paediatric neuropathologist who has served as an expert witness in many shaken baby trials, was struck off the medical register for misconduct.[71] Shortly after her conviction, Squier was given the "champion of justice" award by the International Innocence Network for her efforts to free those wrongfully convicted of shaken baby syndrome.[72]

Squier denied the allegations and appealed the decision to strike her off the medical register.

High Court of England and Wales in October 2016, an open letter to the British Medical Journal questioning the decision to strike off Squier, was signed by 350 doctors, scientists, and attorneys.[74] On 3 November 2016, the court published a judgment which concluded that "the determination of the MPT [Medical Practitioners Tribunal] is in many significant respects flawed".[75] The judge found that she had committed serious professional misconduct but was not dishonest. She was reinstated to the medical register but prohibited from giving expert evidence in court for the next three years.[76]

In 2022, Channel 4 in the UK broadcast a documentary called The Killer Nanny: Did She Do It? concerning the Louise Woodward case. In it, civil rights lawyer Clive Stafford Smith stated, "shaken baby syndrome is bullshit".[77]

See also

References

  1. ^
    S2CID 38035821
    .
  2. ^
    ISBN 9780826161765. Archived
    from the original on 5 November 2017.
  3. ^ a b c d e f "Preventing Abusive Head Trauma in Children". www.cdc.gov. 4 April 2017. Archived from the original on 11 June 2017. Retrieved 9 June 2017.
  4. ^
    S2CID 51878771
    .
  5. ^ "NINDS Shaken Baby Syndrome information page". National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. 14 February 2014. Archived from the original on 29 May 2014. Retrieved 23 June 2008.
  6. ^
    PMID 23079748
    .
  7. S2CID 23001705
    .
  8. S2CID 22053709
    .
  9. S2CID 22053709
    .
  10. ^ Dural hemorrhage in non-traumatic infant deaths: does it explain the bleeding in 'shaken baby syndrome'? Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2003 Feb;29(1):14-22. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2990.2003.00434.x. Erratum in: Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2003 Jun;29(3):322. PMID 12581336.";>
  11. ^ B.G.Brogdon, Tor Shwayder, Jamie Elifritz Child Abuse and its Mimics in Skin and Bone
  12. S2CID 11456829. Archived
    from the original on 20 October 2014.
  13. PMID 14455086
    .
  14. ^
    PMID 4559532
    .
  15. ^
    PMID 11433079
    .
  16. ^ a b c d "Shaken Baby Syndrome". Journal of Forensic Nursing. Archived from the original on 5 March 2014. Retrieved 27 April 2011.
  17. ^
    ISBN 978-91-85413-98-0. Archived from the original on 6 June 2017. Retrieved 8 June 2017. {{cite book}}: |website= ignored (help
    )
  18. ^ The Royal College of Pathologists. "Report Of A Meeting On The Pathology Of Traumatic Head Injury In Children" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 June 2013. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  19. SSRN 2048374
    .
  20. S2CID 41784096
    .
  21. PMID 15885948
    .
  22. PMID 16436323
    .
  23. PMID 16497461
    .
  24. PMID 16436323
    .
  25. PMID 28130787
    .
  26. PMID 25905929
    .
  27. S2CID 207365843
    .
  28. ^ Report questioning shaken baby syndrome seriously unbalanced http://www.aappublications.org/content/36/5/1.2
  29. ^ "Shaken Baby Syndrome Resources". American Academy of Ophthalmology. Archived from the original on 1 October 2006.
  30. PMID 23568702
    .
  31. ^ a b Oral R (August 2003). "Intentional head trauma in infants: Shaken baby syndrome". Virtual Children's Hospital. Archived from the original (Archived) on 14 February 2005. Retrieved 9 October 2006.
  32. PMID 19081701
    .
  33. PMID 15044297
    .
  34. ^ Parks, SE, Annest JL, Hill HA, Karch DL (2012). "Pediatric Abusive Head Trauma: Recommended Definitions for Public Health Surveillance and Research". Archived from the original on 8 December 2014. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  35. ^ Abusive Head Trauma: A New Name for Shaken Baby Syndrome Archived 3 November 2014 at the Wayback Machine
  36. ^ Non Accidental Head Injury Cases (NAHI, formerly referred to as Shaken Baby Syndrome Prosecution Approach Archived 6 December 2013 at the Wayback Machine
  37. ^ Clemetson CAB (July 2004). "Capillary Fragility as a Cause of Substantial Hemorrhage in Infants" (PDF). Medical Hypotheses and Research. 1 (2/3): 121–129. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 March 2009. Retrieved 19 May 2009.
  38. ISBN 978-0-306-45148-5
    .
  39. PMID 14468625
    .
  40. S2CID 35179068
    .
  41. PMID 418769
    .
  42. S2CID 34061797
    .
  43. ISBN 978-0-309-04499-8.[permanent dead link
    ]
  44. PMID 6354581
    .
  45. PMID 11533373
    .
  46. PMID 11581484
    .
  47. PMID 26335082
    . Vaccination injections should not be considered a potential cause of retinal hemorrhage in children, and this unsupported theory should not be accepted clinically or in legal proceedings.
  48. S2CID 37717586
    .
  49. ISBN 978-0-8385-9638-8
    .
  50. ISBN 978-0-07-141315-2
    .
  51. PMID 17179400
    .
  52. PMID 25137601
    .
  53. ^ Perkins, Suzanne. (2012). An Ecological Perspective on the Comorbidity of Childhood Violence Exposure and Disabilities: Focus on the Ecology of the School. Psychology of Violence. 2. 75-89. 10.1037/a0026137.
  54. ^ Keenan Heather T, Runyan DK, Marshall SW, Nocera MA, & Merten DF (2004). A population-based comparison of clinical and outcome characteristics of young children with serious inflicted and noninflicted traumatic brain injury Pediatrics, 114(3), 633–639. [PubMed: 15342832]
  55. PMID 29763011
    . Retrieved 27 October 2022.
  56. PMID 5576003
    .
  57. PMID 10703491
    .
  58. ^ Integrity in Science: The Case of Dr Norman Guthkelch, 'Shaken Baby Syndrome' and Miscarriages of Justice By Dr Lynne Wrennall Archived 9 March 2015 at the Wayback Machine
  59. S2CID 36294809. Archived
    from the original on 13 March 2010. Retrieved 30 April 2011.
  60. National Archives.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link
    )
  61. ^ Cuellar M. Causal reasoning and data analysis: Problems with the abusive head trauma diagnosis. Law, Probability and Risk, 2017; 16(4): 223–239. doi:10.1093/lpr/mgx011
  62. ^ Pfeiffer H, et al. External Validation of the PediBIRN Clinical Prediction Rule of Abusive Head Trauma. Pediatrics, 2018; 141(5): e20173674. doi:10.1542/peds.2017-3674
  63. ^
    PMC 4095469
    .
  64. ^ "Shaken baby convictions overturned". Special Reports. Guardian Unlimited. 21 July 2005. Retrieved 15 October 2006.
  65. ^ "Court of Appeals decision - State of Wisconsin v. Audrey A. Edmonds". Wisconsin Court Opinions. Findlaw. 31 January 2008. Retrieved 25 September 2009.
  66. ^ Keith A. Findley Co‐Director, Wisconsin Innocence Project Clinical Professor, University of Wisconsin Law School Litigating Postconviction Challenges to Shaken Baby Syndrome Convictions Archived 15 December 2014 at the Wayback Machine
  67. ^ a b "Rethinking Shaken Baby Syndrome". NPR.org. Archived from the original on 26 May 2015. Retrieved 30 May 2015.
  68. ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 7 December 2014. Retrieved 15 January 2013.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  69. ^ "Conversations with Dr. A. Norman Guthkelch". 20 August 2014. Archived from the original on 19 September 2014. Retrieved 24 September 2014.
  70. ^ "The Nanny Murder Trial: Retro Report Voices: The Lawyer". New York Times. 13 September 2015. Archived from the original on 15 September 2015. Retrieved 14 September 2015.
  71. ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 April 2016. Retrieved 4 April 2016.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  72. ^ Oxford doctor Waney Squire vows to fight suspension over 'shaken baby' trial evidence "Oxford doctor struck off over evidence in 'shaken baby' court cases vows to fight suspension". 4 May 2016. Archived from the original on 10 August 2016. Retrieved 6 May 2016.
  73. ^ "Shaken baby sceptic begins appeal", BBC News, BBC, 18 October 2016, archived from the original on 25 October 2016, retrieved 24 October 2016
  74. ^ Sweeney J (17 October 2016), Should Waney Squier have been struck off over shaken baby syndrome?, BBC, archived from the original on 25 October 2016, retrieved 24 October 2016
  75. ^ "Case No: CO/2061/2016 Approved Judgement" (PDF). 3 November 2016. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 November 2016. Retrieved 4 November 2016.
  76. ^ "Shaken baby evidence doctor reinstated". BBC News. BBC. 3 November 2016. Archived from the original on 4 November 2016. Retrieved 4 November 2016.
  77. ^ "The Killer Nanny: Did She Do It?". Channel 4. 9 January 2022. Retrieved 20 January 2022.(subscription required)

External links

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shaken_baby_syndrome&oldid=1212647177"