Si̍t-chûn Movement
Part of a series on |
Philosophy |
---|
Si̍t-chûn Movement (Chinese: 實存運動; Japanese: じつぞんうんどう), inasmuch as the Kyoto School, Neo-Confucianism and other prominent philosophical movements in the early-twentieth-century East Asia, is a significant philosophical movement during the Japanese colonial rule in Taiwan, in which the intellectuals in the 1920s formulated their reflections on the Taiwanese community through the western values and thoughts and wedged against the colonial domination and imperial assimilation. Si̍t-chûn Movement was intensely bond with political and cultural counter-imperialism, involving intellectuals e.g. Lin Mosei(zh:林茂生), Hung Yao-hsün(zh:洪耀勳), Wen Kwei Liao(zh:廖文奎), Mingdian Liu(zh:劉明電), Shao-Hsing Chen(zh:陳紹馨), Lin Qiu-wu(zh:林秋悟), Hsiang-yu Su(zh:蘇薌雨), Shenqie Zhang(zh:張深切), Chin-sui Hwang(zh:黃金穗), Shoki Coe(zh:黃彰輝), Isshū Yō(zh:楊杏庭), C K Wu(吳 振坤), and so forth. 'At the begin,' according to the Taiwanese cultural sociologist Ren-yi Liao (廖 仁義)'s 1988 grounding formulation, 'Taiwanese Philosophy has been a civil intellectual movement against domination, rather than an academic form of conception.'[1] 'Si̍t-chûn Movement', however, has yet ratified and systemically studied until 2014.[2][3][4]
'Si̍t-chûn' (實存) is a Taiwanese phonic understanding from the widely discussed concept 'Jitsuzon'(実存; じつぞん) in the 1930s Japanese intellectual circles; translated from 'Existenz' by Kyoto School philosopher
Theoretical Formulation
Si̍t-chûn Movement is an intellectual movement on practice, which intensely bond with counter-domination during the Japan colonial rule. Such a cultural and societal movement came along with the political defeat in pursuit of parliamentary autonomy Petition Movement for the Establishment of a Taiwanese Parliament(zh: 臺灣議會設置請願運動)) led by the Taiwanese bourgeois Chiang Wei-shui(zh:蔣渭水), Lin Hsien-tang(zh:林獻堂) and other activists against the colonial regulation 'Law No. 63'(zh:六三法). In 1920s, the Taiwanese Cultural Association(zh:台灣文化協會) galvanized the self-identification from the cultural and societal perspectives, through public lectures, publications, playlets and summer schools, in which intellectuals e.g. Lin Mosei(zh:林茂生), Shao-Hsing Chen(zh:陳紹馨), Lin Qiu-wu(zh:林秋悟) addressed in the public sphere; Lin Qiu-wu(zh:林秋悟) and Isshū Yō(zh:楊杏庭) were involved with student movements, and even Shenqie Zhang(zh:張深切) and Hsiang-yu Su(zh:蘇薌雨) were enlisted to militia resistance. As the Kyoto School, there lies with intellectual similarity yet different understanding on Taiwan philosophical topics from Si̍t-chûn Movement philosophers.
Existence and Truth
Education and Democracy
British philosopher
Individual and the Community
Concurrence with the Kyoto School and the Neo-Confucianism
Some scholars of Si̍t-chûn Movement was apostles of the
Comparing to
|
|
| ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Content | Formulating a Taiwanese community from the western value of education, culture, language, and politics under the colonial repression and assimilation. | Reinvigorating Yamato tradition and Jōdo spirit through the Western philosophies.
|
Convergence with Confucian tradition in face of modern crisis.
| |||
Genealogy | Christian Theology .
|
Christian Theology
|
American Pragmatism
| |||
Background | Resistance against Japanese colonial domination | Meiji westernization to Taisho cultivation | Confucian renaissance responding to Hu Shi(zh:胡適 ) scientism and pragmatism since May Fourth Movement
| |||
Scholar Figures | Lin Mosei(zh:林茂生), Hung Yao-hsün(zh:洪耀勳), Wen Kwei Liao(zh:廖文奎), Mingdian Liu(zh:劉明電), Shao-Hsing Chen(zh:陳紹馨), Lin Qiu-wu(zh:林秋悟), Hsiang-yu Su(zh:蘇薌雨), Shenqie Zhang(zh:張深切), Chin-sui Hwang(zh:黃金穗), Shoki Coe, Isshū Yō(zh:楊杏庭), C K Wu(吳 振坤) | ) | Yifu Ma(zh:馬一浮), Carsun Chang(zh:張君勱), Feng Youlan(zh:馮友蘭), Thomé H. Fang(zh:方東美), Tang Chun-i(zh:唐君毅), Mou Zongsan(zh:牟宗三), Xu Fuguan(zh:徐復觀 )
|
Sino-Japan War and the Postwar Following
Si̍t-chûn Movement had hibernated from the outbreak of Sino-Japan War in 1937 accelerated the '
Most of Si̍t-chûn philosophers suffered for the wartime and the suppression. A philosopher of Anthropology
Ren-yi Liao articulated that during the postwar
Bibliography
- 洪耀勳(1932),〈創造台人言語也算是一大使命〉,《台灣新民報》400號(1932 年1 月30 日)。
- 洪耀勳(1942),〈實存之有限性與形而上學之問題〉,《師大學刊》第1 輯(1942 年6 月),後收錄於《實存哲學論評》。
- 洪耀勳(1943),〈存在論之新動向〉,《師大學刊》第2 輯(1943 年6月),後收錄於氏著《實存哲學論評》,台北:水牛。。
- 洪耀勳(1948),〈基礎存在論的方法問題〉,收錄於氏著《實存哲學論評》,台北:水牛。
- 廖仁義(1988),〈台灣哲學的歷史構造─日據時期台灣哲學思潮的發生與演變〉,發表於《當代》第28 期,1988 年8 月,頁25-34,後收錄於廖仁義,《異端觀點:戰後台灣文化霸權的批判》,台北:桂冠,1990,頁17-35。
- zh:吳叡人,1999,〈祖國的辯證:廖文奎(1905-1952)臺灣民族主義思想初探〉,《思與言》,卷37,頁47-100。(重新刊載於[[:zh:zh:洪子偉]](編),2016,《存在交涉:日治時期的臺灣哲學》,頁191-234。臺北:聯經。
- zh:吳叡人,2006,〈福爾摩沙意識型態—試論日本殖民統治下臺灣民族運動「民族文化」論述的形成(1919-1937)〉,《新史學》,卷17期2,頁127-218。
- zh:吳叡人,2016,〈Quo Vadis Formosa?:在資本主義—國家巨靈的陰影下》,《受困的思想》。臺北:衛城。
- 林巾力,2007,〈自我、他者、共同體——論洪耀勳〈風土文化觀〉,《臺灣文學研究》,期1,頁73-107。
- zh:洪子偉,2014,〈臺灣哲學盜火者-洪耀勳的本土哲學建構與戰後貢獻〉,《臺大文史哲學報》,期81,頁113-147。
- zh:洪子偉(編),2016,《存在交涉:日治時期的臺灣哲學》。臺北:聯經。
- zh:洪子偉、鄧敦民(編),2019,《啟蒙與反叛─臺灣哲學的百年浪潮》。臺北:國立臺灣大學出版中心。
- 梁家瑜,2016,〈找回我們的經典─從《存在與交涉: 日治時期的臺灣哲學》談起〉,《人本教育札記》,期327,頁38-41。
- 廖仁義,1988,〈臺灣哲學的歷史構造─日據時期臺灣哲學思潮的發生與演變〉,《當代》,期28,頁25-34。
- 藍弘岳,2016,〈想想臺灣思想史:評析《存在交涉:日治時期的臺灣哲學》〉,《臺灣社會研究季刊》,期105,頁233-250
References
- ^ 廖仁義 (1988). "臺灣哲學的歷史構造─日據時期臺灣哲學思潮的發生與演變". 當代 (28): 25–34. (收入廖仁義,《異端觀點:戰後臺灣文化霸權的批判》,臺北:桂冠,1990,頁17-35)
- ISSN 1015-2687.
- ^ 高君和, 張峰賓 (2016). 追求純粹形式的沉思者─黃金穗的日常性現象學與臺灣本土文化運動. In zh:洪子偉 [in Chinese] (ed.). 存在交涉:日治時期的臺灣哲學. 臺北: 聯經. pp. 281–320.
- ^ 廖欽彬 (2018). "務台理作與洪耀勳的思想關連─辯證法實存概念的探索". 臺大哲學論評 (55): 1–32.
- .
- ^ 志野好伸 (2018). "存在搭橋:曾天從與洪耀勳的真理觀". 臺灣東亞文明研究學刊. 1 (15): 25–48.
- ^ zh:吳叡人 [in Chinese] (2015-01-02). "《南之洛馱思論壇》台灣是「殖民」亦或「後殖民」?". YouTube.
- ^ 鄭喜恆 (2019). 杜威的教育哲學與林茂生的哲學實踐. In 鄧敦民; zh:洪子偉 [in Chinese] (eds.). 啟蒙與反叛─臺灣哲學的百年浪潮. 臺北: 國立臺灣大學出版中心.
- ISBN 9781317829881.
- ^ 蔡政宏 (2019). 廖文奎的道德直覺論. In 鄧敦民; zh:洪子偉 [in Chinese] (eds.). 啟蒙與反叛─臺灣哲學的百年浪潮. 臺北: 國立臺灣大學出版中心.
- .
- ^ 張政遠 (2016). 陳紹馨的哲學思想. In zh:洪子偉 [in Chinese] (ed.). 存在交涉:日治時期的臺灣哲學. 臺北: 聯經. pp. 235–250.
- ^ 藤田正勝 (2018). "洪耀勳與日本的哲學". 臺灣東亞文明研究學刊. 1 (15): 1–24.
- ^ 黃崇修 (2016). 日本陽明學發展氛圍下的臺灣思想家林茂生. In zh:洪子偉 [in Chinese] (ed.). 存在交涉:日治時期的臺灣哲學. 臺北: 聯經. pp. 63–90.
- .
- OCLC 952951598.
- ^ 林義正 (2005). 張深切的孔子哲學研究. 第四屆臺灣文化國際學術研討會論文集─臺灣思想與臺灣主體性. 臺北: 臺灣師範大學臺灣語文學系. pp. 77–90. (收入zh:洪子偉(編),2016,《存在交涉:日治時期的臺灣哲學》,頁 167-190。臺北:聯經)
- ^ 廖仁義 (1988). "臺灣哲學的歷史構造─日據時期臺灣哲學思潮的發生與演變". 當代 (28): 25–34. (收入廖仁義,《異端觀點:戰後臺灣文化霸權的批判》,臺北:桂冠,1990,頁17-35)
- ^ "臺灣哲學會正式成立". 中華日報. 1996-01-08.
See also
- Academia Sinica, 'Taiwan Philosophy and Si̍t-chûn Movement',《Literature Archive》.
- Shao-Hsing Chen(zh:陳紹馨)
- Hung Yao-hsün(zh:洪耀勳)
- Chin-sui Hwang(zh:黃金穗)
- Wen Kwei Liao(zh:廖文奎)
- Li Chun sheng(zh:李春生)
- Lin Mosei(zh:林茂生)
- Shenqie Zhang(zh:張深切)
- Zeng Tianzong(zh:曾天從)
- Lin Qiu-wu(zh:林秋悟)
- Su-Qing Lin(zh:林素琴)
- Isshū Yō(zh:楊杏庭)
- Hsiang-yu Su(zh:蘇薌雨)
- Ming-kun Kuo(zh:郭明昆)
- Fa-Yu Cheng(zh:鄭發育)