Hello Paul and a big thanks for the updates concerning the port and the minister. YOu can also get back to me through linkedin so that we can communicate directly. Cheers
DYK for Tell Ezou
nominate
) 00:02, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
Lebanon and Eden
I'm not sure I've done it well enough, but I'm trying to clarify both that these authors are not suggesting that a real Eden was in Lebanaon, and the subtlety of what they are saying. In one case it even appears that the author is discussing Lebanon as being not necessarily a physical place. I'm happy to discuss my edits on the article talk page.
talk
) 18:41, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
As long as Lebanon's finally on the suggested location list, I'm a happy man Doug. Your edits look okay to me. I'm just glad you didn't judge Ezekiel, the "son of man" as an unreliable, fringe source... i know how much you want to ;-) 20:25, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
To go into more detail, you'll see that the Brown and Swarup go into details about how paradise, eden and lebanese forests are entwined in prophetic writings. Jeremiah also comes close to describing the same thing with a vision of trees, whilst about nine other prophets also discuss paradiso and eden in transitional terms which show the development and use of the word in this period. I've been having some interesting discussions with friends about the vulgate/douay rheims versions of that chapter. Some good modern sources that I hope we'll agree is a beneficial addition to the page. Paul Bedson ❉talk❉ 20:42, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
"The holy Tigris, the holy Euphrates / the holy sceptre of Enlil / establish Kharsag.
In your recent edits on the Barton Cylinder you've sourced this quote to Black, can't find it there.
talk
) 04:56, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
I put this in the Barton discussion and will make it clearer that the translation is Barton's. Hope you noticed I didn't call it
Thanks. I've redirected Kharsag anyway after our discussion last night. By the way, I think you would be wise to stick to the archaeology rather than O'Brien's translations if I understood you correctly. I'm curious also - are you looking for a real Garden of Eden where there was a real Adam & Eve?
talk
) 08:10, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
No problem, I may make an appropriate stubby page later. Lately I've got quite into antinomianism though - does it really matter if we call it kharsag, hursag or the Babylonian Eden? The concept has adequate discussion outside fringe sources to show the world what it means. The Barton Cylinder and Debate between sheep and grain both show story parallels to Eden in Sumerian literature dated almost 2000 years before the Bible was written. Adam and Eve show links to Enlil and Ninkharsag and Cain and Abel taken from Lahar and Anshar. There's even adequate discussion about a primordial location where the events of the tales take place and several commentators noting that the stories were handed down from a much earlier date.
What I am looking for is what I have found already, an unexcavated
neolithic revolution
.
The people who inhabited the site, I would suggest were the first to establish an irrigated settlement where they domesticated animals and grains and initially diffused this knowledge outward to the surrounding areas of the Jordan Valley, Syria and Turkey. The closest remains of an Adam and Eve that we'll find are probably represented by the painted skulls dug up at Tell Aswad by Danielle Stordeur. Who knows what is under the soil still however.
I agree that I should stick to the archaeology, and many trained in this field, like yourself will run a mile before looking seriously at any evidence tainted with religious suggestions about Eden. This seems a modern anomaly, and somewhat of a shame considering all the valuable discoveries of the last 2 centuries based on documentary evidence from the Bible, Armana tablets, etc.
I still consider these early creation myths as something that still needs a vast amount of work to improve our understanding and am quite cheered by the work on Sheep and grain, especially Black removing the deification of Lahar and Anshar. It shows that whilst O'Brien may have shot off on his own tangent, discovering what he discovered, modern scholars are catching up and improving on his suggestions in different ways and coming to similar, down to earth, agrarian interpretations without the gods, demons and evil spirits of the early translators.
Hopefully in depth coverage (as a pose to impossible to find translations in obscure Japanese journals like Acta Sumeriologica) on Wikipedia will encourage scholars to expand studies in this regard, so I still see it as valuable contribution along with the archaeology. Hope you agree. Paul Bedson ❉talk❉ 14:31, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
Incidentally, if you can find another copy of the Bendt and Westenholz translation, I would be really grateful. Your old link to the PDF seems to have dissappeared with the creation of ORACC. Paul Bedson ❉talk❉ 14:44, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
Ok. We know, or at least many scholars say, that the biblical myths in Genesis have earlier Sumerian sources, so finding new ones is not a terrible surprise.
talk
) 15:37, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
Not a terrible surprise, but a rebalancing. The
satellite photography detection of the remains of a massive neolithic ruins and underground streams in a basin just north of Mount Hermon. Paul Bedson ❉talk
❉ 22:55, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Tell Halula
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
This is a "Hello" ! ! message from the author of the
Mark Zuckerburg, --Facebook, --creating, --dreams, --passions, -- -- -- that all of that is a testament to our humanity. Wikipedia, your follow-on articles, "Paul Bedson",... all a testament. (Of note, the Time Magazine article on Zuckerburg, explains how he at age 13 created a Network in his house for his Mom, Dad, Sister, etc. ....Wow, another, top of the skull blown off by what I read!)).. So, thanx, ...Welcome to Wikipedia, ... I hope to give a Star, or Cookie, (I have never given one)... you already, deserve 1 or 2, in my book.) Cheers... --(from the the HotSonoran Desert, Arizona,USA--Mmcannis (talk
) 12:14, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
My thanks indeed for giving me the idea and template. Such kind and inspired praise gives me a lot of encouragement. I've been thinking to move van Dijk's discussion into the dispute sections of each one. I'll look into doing some other improvements and the Debate between copper and silver, but kinda had my eyes on the Debate between hoe and plough next in that series.
I have to take a break and do
PPNB megasite with canal, a reservoir for winter water, etc. If that can get noted, a lot more people will quickly reach a similar mindset and outlook as you regarding "religion". Hopefully then we can answer questions like that posed in the section above about where the settlers of Tell Halula came from with their fully domesticated the forms of barley, wheat and flax at 7750 BC. Paul Bedson ❉talk
❉ 13:17, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Debate between sheep and grain
nominate
) 08:05, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Thank you
Thank you, Paul Bedson, for your kind comments about my efforts writing and creating the new article The Kid (musical). Much appreciated. ;) There is a free-use image used in the article already, if you want to use that along with the hook, that is fine by me. I just thought there were probably more interesting free-use images to choose from with other articles' hooks, nature, wildlife, scenery, etc. -- Cirt (talk) 14:28, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Nuska, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.onuska.com.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not
talk
) 12:22, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
ROFL!!! The website you mention is entitled Matt and Cindy's Website, which I certainly didn't source when writing about the Sumerianscribe of the original Decad. Cute though, they look like a happy Enlil and Ninlil, but all relevance lost after that and certainly not a copyright issue. Gotta love bots though, they can cheer you up and make you laugh sometimes. Paul Bedson ❉talk❉ 12:25, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Hahaha! This also made me laugh when I was working at
Sorry to see how this one got stalled. I've started a more formal review of it, and everything looks good to me save one quotation which I'm having trouble finding in the source. See details at
talk
) 14:06, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for that. I've corrected a page number issue on that reference that should have it sorted. Regards, Paul Bedson ❉talk❉ 14:31, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —David Eppstein (talk
) 23:34, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Enlil and Ninlil
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Thelmadatter (talk
) 20:59, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
Please see new note on DYK talk page. Yoninah (talk) 22:41, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --Elonka
17:36, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
FYI, awaiting your reply at the DYK entry regarding the hook. --Elonka 14:48, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Kesh temple hymn
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
DYK nomination of Garden of the gods (Sumerian paradise)
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Drmies (talk
) 15:27, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Song of the hoe
nominate
) 00:04, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Garden of the gods (Sumerian paradise)
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
I will try to be succinct, (not necessarily short):
--I love editting. I only fix a typo, or an edit if I want an article on my watch list. 98 percent are still on my watch list.
--at work once a compatriot had a hard copy, about 7 paragraphs of a hugely technical computer/ sound-(acoustic)/ software-trailer-mounted system for "scoring" a sound-produced event. (think weapons). The first paragraph was one sentence about 10 technical ideas strung together, about 5 sentences worth. I made 2 minor edits for the following 6 paragraphs, but I looked at my buddy, and said-(for para 1)... I get this with these edits to the mid paragraph point.... but from there i am lost. He said, yeah, i know.... I never looked at the final copy, but the Trailer appeared some years later.
--Edits to me, are like the BIG S, in Greek the Sigma-(i.e. Smmation: minor ones added to Major ones): I start at the first sentence, or words, and just continue...(or at midpoint, then go back to Start Point) and continue to the end. For the Song of the hoe, I didn't press SAVE, until between iteration 10 to 20, maybe about the 15th point, I added the last comma, or whatever.
--A quick look at the Gudea cylinders appears to confirm that: Graham Hancock... (his books, follow-on ideas) about the 'star alignments, with buildings is proof from the cylinders that the Great Pyramids,.. are (obviously, (by Deductive Observation, (reasoning), etc)), the three stars of Orion's Belt. (I will never read his books, though I turned pages in them. As with wikipedia, I seldom read EVERY article I edit.) (time)... (I assume Hancock wasn't the FIRST-person)
--I consider ALL of WIKIPEDIA, personal RESEARCH. all of the REF's are irrelevant (to me). Planet Earth-H. Sapies-humanitarium, is still coming out of the Dark Ages (of Religion, and fool-hardy interpretaions of our smarts)
--Paul, please explain the title on my talk page: (if you care to): == Fit like min (what like man) ==. I'm smart, (but not clairvoyant-smart)(I have only one guess what it means)
--I used to order the book at the Bookstore (B. & Noble), and have a shelf (1/4th filled with books on Egypt-(at the store), ...that I had at home). (the favorite was the (book), with the (now famous, color)
Dashur-necklace encircling the 5 Hieroglyph-based small, miniature "pendants" where 1 of 5 was upside down. To view, the book had to be rotated 180 deg.).. (it's the Hotep
"tablet", with hieroglyphs sitting on it instead).. (these are all beautifil, colorful, stone-inlaid pendants)
Charles R. Pellegrino's book from some years ago, Return to Sodom and Gomorah-(I read most of it once-(or twice): uses the term riverworlds referring to the Nile Egypt, and the Tigris-Euphrates-World... It explains why the cultures began at the same starting points.. (water), it also explains why they are so dramatically different in their typology, cosmology, etc. (Not Pellegrino's explanation: but using the term, easily defines the history from about 5500 BC to the Greek-Roman World time)
These are just 'notes to self', and as I started editting some of your articles, I knew you'd be examining my edits.... For what it is worth, on Wikipedia Commons I created, first: Category:Hieroglyphs on meda, then Category:Cuneiform on media. The Gudea cylinders photos have been there at least 2-3 years-(Category:Hieroglyphs on clay cylinders-(or whatever the cat name is).... And I had to go to commons to make the Cat: Category:Hieroglyphs of Egypt (check the Category:Meteor hieroglyph, and look at the stele in the Louvre).. that categorizing of Photos was needed before I worked on the Category:Egyptian hieroglyphs-Gardiner listed. Till later... (floating along in my own 'Edin') And...thanks for giving me "grist for the mill", and how many more topics are on the clay tablets (it is pretty much endless, part of my quote: "you can't teach, what you don't know")... [from the HOT-108-to-114-Deg-3 weeks-more) SonoranDesert-ArizonaUSA-... Mmcannis (talk) 06:54, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Gudea cylinders
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Zoeperkoe (talk
) 20:02, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
PS, Paul, I know about your "crusade" but sometimes you should try to remain a little bit more objective and precise in their interpretation, if I may say so (and please don't take offense, I think that in general you are doing a good job). Also, I get the impression that you paraphrase sources quite closely; you might want to work on that a little bit since sometimes it might border on plagiarism.--Zoeperkoe (talk) 20:02, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the good advice. Will try to be a bit more wordsmithy for you. Thinking objectively, this has given me several ideas to get better evidence for the levantine corridor primacy argument. I like the idea of a "crusade", thanks for giving me some guidance on better areas for the offensive. lol. Paul Bedson ❉talk❉ 20:28, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
You have new mail in your DYK submission. As far as "this has given me several ideas to get better evidence for the levantine corridor primacy argument", that's exactly the whole point. It's not up to you to find better evidence for one argument at the expense of another (at least not here on WP); it's up to you to say what others say about it, and to do that in such a way as to comply with
wp:due. Please don't get carried away too much by your own enthusiasm! --Zoeperkoe (talk
) 20:57, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
I am not trying to find better evidence, just updated, modern evidence. Much of which is not well documented on WP. I will try to remain balanced and reflect consensus though. You do well to remind me.Paul Bedson ❉talk❉ 21:30, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
Good comments. I'll also add that I think at times you are relying on Google snippets, which is rarely a good thing as you haven't seen the context, and that you need to keep closer to what the sources actually say. And Wikipedia is not a venue for presenting new information to the world - something I think you know you are trying to do.
But you can't delete my sandbox... It's my mind... It's what I am thinking... I'm not speaking it live on Wikipedia. You can't take my thoughts from me! *Runs to the window and shakes fist* Paul Bedson ❉talk❉ 17:44, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Your sandbox and some general advice
Hi Paul, you asked about my opinion on your sandbox. I only skimmed through it, but from what I saw I get the impression that you are pretty far out there if you want to connect Sumerian myths from the 3rd millennium BC with Lebanese sites from the 10th millennium BC and there is definitely no scientist who will support this. And that is not because there is some cover-up going on or because they are "bumbling" or "frightened" (which I actually consider quite an offense toward Near Eastern archaeologists; you have apparently no idea to what lengths they sometimes go to try and do their work in war-torn countries like Iraq and Lebanon in the past), but simply because it is not supported by the facts. To give another example, if you want to know the source of the Jordan River, don't go with some 19th century travel writer that happens to fit your ideas, but look up a modern hydrology report. Furthermore, if your aim is to save this "Aaiha site" from destruction, writing articles on WP isn't the way to go because it won't help a bit. Connecting it with Sumerian myths isn't either. I'm sorry, but Near Eastern rescue archaeology simply doesn't work that way. The WP article on Ur or Babylon hasn't saved them from getting destroyed after the Iraq war, and yours isn't going to save sites in Lebanon. That shouldn;t stop you from contributing to WP though, but you just have to be realistic about it.
In the meantime, I suggest you move
ZAD 2 to Zahrat adh-Dhraʻ 2, because that's how the site is named. In your enthusiasm to generate as much information as possible, you make simple mistakes like these that can be avoided. Again, don't take offense, but I suggest that you take some more time to do more research before you start writing articles (or ask someone for advice before you start; you are not the only one who works on Near Eastern archaeology). Your output is so incredibly high that people like me or Doug simply can't keep up checking it. For example, you are involved in a merge discussion on Wall of Jericho, and I would actually like to suggest a merge for the Tower of Jericho
as well (especially since both articles contain some factual errors and the astronomy thing simply doesn't make sense; there is not even an explanation as to why that shadow should be important in the first place and why it can't be simple coincidence which is very likely in a mountainous area like that), and you are already working on new ones. Instead, you might want to look at some of the articles you already wrote, and maybe re-edit them and check them for factual mistakes that might have arisen from you going through sources too quickly, or using Google Books snippets that do not provide the whole context of a quote? Again, I think it is great that you are so excited about Near Eastern prehistory, and in general your work is good, but it's these little things that could be better. Given the quantity you've already produced, shouldn't it be time that you start to work on quality and factuality a little bit more?
Again, please don't take offense at my comments. You are of course free to do what you want (and again, I think it's really great that you want to invest so much time in improving coverage of the ancient Near East on WP), but since you asked for my opinion; this is it. Happy editing! --Zoeperkoe (talk) 05:11, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your opinion. I am quite impressed that you bothered and will go and remove the bumbling comment right away. It has raised the issue of transmission of history using language, which we have different perspectives about and I clearly don't consider so "far out there". The site at Aaiha could have existed until around 6000 to 5500 BC before a hiatus in time when the Sumerians arrived at Eridu. I can see how it is viewed as radical as there is no evidence that we would have passed down our history via language and will look for sources that have explored this suggestion. I will take your comments under consideration on the mythology matter. Regarding the astronomy, they positioned it that way in my opinion for ceremonial purposes. You have to imagine their ceremonies to understand the purpose. I guess that's not very scientific though. Check out the video in the Jerusalem Post article, [2] it explains all with computer graphics and media hype. I don't think you can merge the tower as it qualifies as the
world's tallest structure between 8000 to 2650 BC. The wall is still under discussion but I should hope my latest expansion should qualify it for it's own page. I'll concede you're right about Zahrat adh-Dhraʻ 2 and will go move that. Paul Bedson ❉talk
❉
05:47, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
P.S. A modern hydrology report would show fissures through the karst limestone topography from the
Palestinians if it got there. This greedy world somehow stole my pictures and video of the site and left me with nothing more than a rock and my words and information on here to alert the academic community with. I understand your skepticism about the effectiveness of my efforts but thank you again for all the assistance tidying up after me and helping me try.Paul Bedson ❉talk
❉ 06:07, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Iraq ed-Dubb
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
For providing a great coverage of ancient moments and sites from Lebanon to Cornwall. Keep it up! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:57, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Tower of Jericho
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
was not submitted properly. I have fixed it for you, but in the future please be careful to review the new instructions. Basically all there is to it is
WP:AFD, you'll find this process very similar. rʨanaɢ (talk
) 02:07, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for this. I saw it had changed, but didn't read up on how and was in a rush to meet the deadline on it so just did it the old way. I'll be sure to nominate according to procedure in future. Thanks for fixing that and filling me in on the info. Paul Bedson ❉talk❉ 02:47, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Heavy Neolithic
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
License tagging for File:Heavyneolithicsteepscraper.jpg
Thanks for uploading
image copyright tags
to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from
this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk
) 00:05, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
License tagging for File:Heavyneolithicscraper.jpg
Thanks for uploading
image copyright tags
to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from
this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk
) 00:06, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Orangeslice.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Orangeslice.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:41, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Upload your free media to Commons, please!
It is better if your free images can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons as opposed to Wikipedia. Freely licensed or public domain media are more accessible to other Wikimedia projects if placed on Commons. Thank you: Jay8g (talk) 22:23, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Ourrouar, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Calabe1992 (talk) 15:07, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.
Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.
You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 12:43, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Jeita
Hey Paul , your additions to Jeita are amazing! It's great having expert input to this article, i think it can easily pass FA status
+
09:01, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Wow! I just realised that if so, it'll be the first FA that I'll have contributed to significantly. Thanks Elie. :-) Will try and make some more interesting Lebanese archaeological additions soon! Paul Bedson ❉talk❉ 00:11, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
Somebody started this, needs a lot of work...♦ Dr. Blofeld 07:28, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads up. You could probably start a page on the Architecture of Byblos that could fill twice that page. I am a tiddly bit busy taking my neolithic work to the attention of the authorities there at the moment. Hope to be back on project more in the new year! Kind Regards, Paul Bedson ❉talk❉ 22:33, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Belated response
Hi Paul,
Sorry, I was out of the country and missed your post somehow. From the powerpoint presentation it looks as though you had a fascinating time. I can't make any comments about it except that it's awfully tricky separating out evidence of roundhouses to find out which were contemporary. Good luck with it.
And thanks for the kind comments - all the best to you and yours (well, not UKIP I'm afraid, but as an American I've got a different point of view about many things involved in British politics).
talk
) 17:37, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Thank you Doug. Your encouragement and best wishes mean more than you could know right now. I am very grateful for your time to look at the presentation. Your comments are similar to
Bekaa Valley) coming from a book depository in Jerusalem for 2012. We should have some fun. Look forward to that and I hope you have/had a good break. Paul Bedson ❉talk
❉ 04:36, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
Interesting. I just looked at Cope's article, I had no idea about his music. Enjoy Brighton.
I doubt it will be as big a seller as the Bible, but figure this knowledge of mankind's first culture should be available for all, for free on here. Or in print if you want it. :) Paul Bedson ❉talk❉ 05:08, 24 December 2011 (UTC) 05:07, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
Most of it is available free here - it's a collection of our articles and other sources, selling for $45, which I guess is better than some of his other collections of Wikipedia and other free articles selling for $113 of $114. I'm glad to see that Amazon makes it clear what these are.
talk
) 06:31, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
RE:Shemouniyeh & Wadi Sallah
No worries, I saw that someone had added to the Wadi al-Far'a article and it led me to your work. It's always good to see editors work diligently on a neglected subject on Wikipedia. If you need an extra hand anywhere let me know and I'll try to contribute however I can. Keep up the great work, cheers! --Al Ameer son (talk) 22:01, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
You aren't funny
You've lost any respect I had for you. This sort of behavior is just asking to be blocked.
talk
) 18:39, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
I'll get back to work on archaeology matters here soon. My apologies for any inconvenience. Let me know if I can assist with anything to rebuild your respect. Paul Bedson ❉talk❉ 19:01, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
ANI
Notice of discussion at the Administrators' Noticeboard
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at
talk
) 19:03, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
It appears to be a co-operative attempt to create an article called Time Vortices at some point in the future. Paul Bedson ❉talk❉ 21:55, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
January 2012
Do not create, add, or restore hoaxes to Wikipedia, such as you did with the article Tempomania. Hoaxes are caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. The BushrangerOne ping only 19:09, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of
British Edda
for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/British Edda until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
You have been blockedindefinitely from editing for sockpuppetry. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. WilliamH (talk) 22:08, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
Note that I am not the blocking administrator. WilliamH (talk) 22:10, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
You are using this template in the wrong namespace. Use this template on your talk page instead.You are using this template in the wrong namespace. Use this template on your talk page instead.
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an
administrator
has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.
To contribute to the next newsletter, please visit the Newsletter draft page. ARS Members automatically receive this newsletter. To opt out, please remove your name from the recipients list.
Unblocked
You are using this template in the wrong namespace. Use this template on your talk page instead.
Note I have not unblocked User:A Timelord at this point, although he has been in contact with me and I am satisfied that he is not Paul Bedson. He is more problematic and I am awaiting further information. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 14:29, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Paul, could you please explain the relationship between A Timelord and you, discuss why you engaged in the creation of what was apparently an obvious hoax, and why we should believe you're not going to do it again? Thanks. Hipocrite (talk) 19:38, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
A Timelord is a friend of mine. We didn't mean to create a hoax but an attempt to establish a consensus for change to
WP:ERA
rule that states: Do not arbitrarily change from one era style to the other on any given article. Instead, attempt to establish a consensus for change at the talk page. Reasons for the proposed change should be specific to the content of the article; a general preference for one style over another is not a valid reason.
That is over now, we did our best, it maybe got a bit out of hand, but I have no intention for any further efforts to establish consensus on that issue, as I am sure A Timelord won't bother if he is ever unblocked. I have lots more important work to do documenting of the Heavy Neolithic archaeological sites of the Qaraoun culture that started "culture" in the first place. That will keep me busy and I have assured Elen that I will try my very best to avoid anything that might be disruptive. Paul Bedson ❉talk❉ 20:20, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Paul, I don't see how edit comments full of "TARDIS noise" or a mass deletion of an article and replacement by some fringe stuff here [4] was trying to gain consensus for anything.
talk
) 20:37, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Sorry about that! That was an accident caused when creating a page on a live page. I reverted it within 11 minutes if you check the log. Apologies again. Paul Bedson ❉talk❉ 21:11, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Dispute resolution survey
Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite
Hello Paul Bedson. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released.
Please click HERE to participate.
Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts.
You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated
DR goes to Wikimania!
01:13, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
Date formats
Hey! Just wanted to point you toward the MOS for date formats
WP:DATE, particularly involving how to write the dates. On wikipedia, we don't ever use th, st, or nd, and days of the week are not normally needed either. Just a gentle reminder :) Jeancey (talk
) 23:49, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks! I have been on a bit of a break, so needed reminding! Paul Bedson ❉talk❉ 23:51, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 29
Hi. When you recently edited
Syrian uprising (2011–present), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SAS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:13, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Phoenician port info
Hello Paul, I am trying to get to you to be able to have direct exchanges by email as I am not a wiki expert. Thanks for responding to my linked in invite so that we can talk more easily. A big thanks for all the great and objective inputs. Concerning Hisham Sayegh I got a confirmation that he was on holidays until june 28th and that he resigned on the 27th. HIs contract did not end on april 2012 as mentioned on the contrary with his extra time off the contract was supposed to end on june 28th. Thanks for highlighting this point int he port article. Cheers... YOu can reach me under (talk) Many thanks... —Preceding undated comment added 23:00, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Non-notable person. Sources are lack independence, except for one, which clearly casts itself as a tabloid.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
In the external links there's an Emmy award winning documentary hosted by A-list notable celebrity Charlton Heston discussing this guy's work. I have added plenty of other mainstream sources to the article to beef up that he's obviously notable. Paul Bedson ❉talk❉ 20:27, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
That would be grand, except that there's no reliable source that it won an emmy and the official lists appear to have neglected to mention it.
I found a pay site that confirms the Emmy, although I don't think your sources are sufficient. I've reverted the stuff about the book with Scranton suggesting West is notable, the way I read the sources they just ignore West, suggesting he is anything but notable for that book.
talk
) 10:59, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
I guess his primary notability is for erosion hypothesis. Have put an external link to a YouTube video of him and Scranton. Paul Bedson ❉talk❉ 11:40, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
I found an extra source for the emmy in a UCL published book that should make it reliable enough.[3]
A tag has been placed on Aonach (company), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See
Wikipedia:FAQ/Business
for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ben Ben (talk) 03:51, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
No problem. I didn't make that page, simply moved it to make way for details about the historical Aonachs. Paul Bedson ❉talk❉ 09:30, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
Autopatrolled
Hey; I've re-granted you the "autopatrolled" userright; you've been writing some fantastic articles :). Keep up the great work! Ironholds (talk) 17:10, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 19
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:29, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Edmund Marriage
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs
) 20:58, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Please note than in addition to problems with the content, I have expressed concerns that you may have a
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edmund Marriage until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs) 14:01, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:40, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
Douris, Lebanon
This is an automated message from
Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary
to preserve attribution history.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article.
talk
) 23:34, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. I am just moving some populated place pages that have got (village) or (Baalbek) after them to standardise on ", Lebanon". Hopefully nothing to worry about. Paul Bedson ❉talk❉ 23:36, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
September 2012
Hi, and thank you for
cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history
, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the
Oops, sorry about this. I'll follow procedure next time I move a page. Thanks! Paul Bedson ❉talk❉ 23:50, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
It's not always obvious how different things work around here, so no worries. Just to clarify, if you wrote the entire article yourself and are the only major contributor (such as appears to be the case with
Yanta (village), unless that content started at some other article that I'm unaware of), then cutting and pasting is acceptable although discouraged. It's when you are moving around pages with significant contributions from others that it runs into a copyright situation that needs to be fixed. Have you moved around any other articles around in this way which you didn't write yourself? VernoWhitney (talk
) 00:02, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Not lately. I think I had this problem in the past once when I moved a page a long time ago, I forgot there was procedure to follow. Sorry again. Paul Bedson ❉talk❉ 00:07, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Paul, a quick scan of your contributions shows that you have done other cut-and-paste-moves. So far, I have identified
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward F. Malkowski until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs) 12:11, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
After encountering your articles on Edmund Marriage and th Patrick Foundation and taking to AFD here, I have looked at more of your contributions to see if they replicated any of the problems which I identified there: COI, irrelevant or misleading citations, or lack of notability. I also scrutinised your contributions for instances of whether you had been pushing fringe POVs.
I have only spent about an hour on this, but the results so far are alarming:
Several articles which you created have only one source, and thereby fail notability guidelines: e.g. Denis Buzy, Wadi Tahuna
WP:COI), I found that out of 7 footnotes there was one completely irrelevant citation, and 3 citations to unreliable sources. One of those citations was to the pseudohistorian R. A. Schwaller de Lubicz
, who you have referenced extensively in your editing
Wandlebury Enigma
enigma contains another irrelevant citation, to an authoritative source which clearly does not support the facts referenced
I have nor examined all of the sources in those articles, but I am concerned that some of the other refs may be to self-published or fringe theories
So far as I can see, a significant portion of your editing consists of promoting theories which as you say have been ignored by the corporate world of academia. This is not what Wikipedia is for.
So far as I can see, you have a long pattern of systematically ignoring some of the basic principles of Wikipedia:
Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought
, and your promotion topics or views which you feel have been ignored breaches that principle
Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion, and should not be used to promote your friends or colleagues such as Edmund Marriage
Your use of references is consistently very poor. As noted above, you repeatedly cite refs to unreliable sources, and you repeatedly add references which do not support the facts which they are claimed to assert
Your extensive contributions now range across many related articles, and your userpage makes it explicitly clear that your primary purpose in editing Wikipedia is to promote the fringe theories of your friend Edmund Marriage and his late uncle Christian O'Brien.
This has now continued for a long time, and you have been warned about it before (e.g. in July 2011). At this point, I think that it is time for you to stop making any contributions to Wikipedia in respect of archaeology or myths, or the theories of Christian O'Brien/Edmund Marriage/Schwaller de Lubicz et al. Your interest in these topics is fine, but Wikipedia should not be used in the way you have been using it; your desire to promote these theories is perfectly legitimate, but should not be pursued through Wikipedia.
As to the rest of your editing, the problems I have identified in referencing suggest to me that you should seek assistance in improving the quality of your work. You may find that Wikipedia:Editor review could help.
You are free to disagree with any or all of what I have written, but if you continue to misuse references or push fringe theories and topics where you have a COI, then I am minded to use Wikipedia's sanctions processes to have restrictions imposed on your editing. I would much prefer that you took it upon yourself to try to follow Wikipedia's policies. --BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs) 13:46, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
The discussions on such topics as
Wandlebury Enigma were held a long time ago and I may not be entirely responsible for all the references on those pages anymore. They were made years ago. The inline reference to the Golden Age Project Website on Christian O'Brien can certainly be deleted, that shouldn't be there. I discussed R. A. Schwaller de Lubicz with Dougweller, who judged him as "notable fringe" at the time, so permitted his use to some extent. If that needs clearing up, let me know, but talk to Doug first. I'll do some research on Amazon rankings and the book results, but kinda think Edward F. Malkowski
also falls into that category. We can discuss that on the AFD page.
Now, as for
Aaiha plain. Recording the history of human culture is what Wikipedia is all about, despite all the rules, which I do my best to abide by. I'll happily admit that I have a COI writing about my ancestors, but then everyone does because they are your ancestors too. Threatening sanctions against this could be interpreted as COI against humanity and possibly even racist against the Lebanese! My interest also comes from visiting the site and walking along the 1 mile bedrock cut "river of Eden" (which you can go see on Google Earth) and seen the cave at the start of the Jordan, which is specialist knowledge that Wikipedia should value.[[5]] In this effort, I can only ensure my continued diligence and hope that your continued reviewing of my work will enlighten you about the Tahunian / Qaraoun culture and their place in history, archaeology and mythology. Paul Bedson ❉talk
❉ 16:09, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Paul, your claim that "sanctions against this could be interpreted as COI against humanity and possibly even racist against the Lebanese" is as much of a fringe theory as the POVs you are pushing. Please stop being silly.
Specialist knowledge is great, but Wikipedia is not the place for pushing your own work "early Neolithic cultures of Lebanon" or anything else. Wikipedia requires NPOV, rather than trying to build the case for what you acknowledge are "non-mainstream theories". See
I get the point, less fringe pushing, but the "early Neolithic cultures of Lebanon" were the focus of the first female professor, Dorothy Garrod, who along with Lorraine Copeland, Henri Fleisch, Henri de Contenson, Jacques Cauvin amongst many other notable archaeologists and Jesuits passed this information on to me to give to Wikipedia and the world. I've read those rules and give them due consideration. The spirit to explore our Near Eastern ancestry has been one of the highest virtues since the days when Flinders Petrie set an example with it. These are the people whose work I am pushing and suggest you read up on them to see why. Paul Bedson ❉talk❉ 19:06, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Paul, Wikipedia is not a means to pass on info given to you by individuals. It's a tertiary publication, which means that it covers the state of knowledge as expressed in secondary reliable sources. It's also an NPOV publication, so you should not be pushing anybody's work. --BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs) 08:26, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Ok, but the state of knowledge on the origins of human culture as expressed in secondary reliable sources and compiled in this tertiary publication still requires much work and could be greatly improved. It doesn't even know where our oldest city was! Or where the first domesticated
Song of the Hoe are a much higher priority to improve our state of knowledge about, and of course I will endeavor to remain as neutral as possible in my point of view when covering such topics as you suggest. Paul Bedson ❉talk
❉ 17:01, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Rashaya
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Temples of Mount Hermon
nominate
) 16:03, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Divine call
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Secretlondon (talk
) 17:36, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
Azerbijan, Russia, Lebanon, Armenia and other non-European megaliths are all in there too. Perhaps a title change might be more appropriate? Paul Bedson ❉talk
❉
00:05, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
How about European, Eurasian and Eastern Mediteranean Megaliths? Paul Bedson ❉talk❉ 00:10, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
