User talk:Armduino

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ukraine–NATO relations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Kirby.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as European Deterrence Initiative. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 11:44, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For this article, I have fixed it in this edit DanCherek (talk) 11:44, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Armduino! Your additions to

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double
  inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners
  , for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images.
  non-free content criteria
  in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 23:32, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Diannaa: I seem to have followed precisely your point #1. Please explain to me how I could have done better. 14:10, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the delay in repolying; I didn't receive your ping, because you didn't sign your post. The text you copied was short, but there were no quotation marks. You should have re-worded it or omitted it or used quotation marks. — Diannaa (talk) 22:04, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Biological Threat Reduction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ISTC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Armduino

Thank you for creating Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Russian Federation Regarding Cooperation in the Area of Nuclear Material Physical Protection, Control, and Accounting.

Good start!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:07, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000: thank you :) Armduino (talk) 15:53, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Armduino

Thank you for creating Agreement on Joint Measures on Nuclear Weapons.

Good start. I left a note at the article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 17:06, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000: thank you :) Armduino (talk) 15:55, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Canada–Ukraine relations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bayraktar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moxy- 12:43, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• @Moxy: can you point to a specific example please? Armduino (talk) 22:25, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vladimir Putin, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages FSB and SVR.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Armduino

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username TheTechnician27, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheTechnician27}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 19:21, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brenda Lucki, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages NDP and Matthew Green.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Armduino

Thank you for creating NATO Tailored Forward Presence.

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 11:10, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000: thank you :) Armduino (talk) 15:56, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Armduino,

Thank you for creating Punisher (drone).

Thanks for adding the article about the Ukrainian Punisher drone. Your article clearly demonstrates the subject's notability, but it is short so I'm tagging it as a stub.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|PopePompus}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

PopePompus (talk) 23:45, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@PopePompus: thank you :) Armduino (talk) 15:57, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Denazification

added a link pointing to Oleg Morozov

Jagmeet Singh

added a link pointing to Green Party

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Crimean Tatars into Rustam Minnikhanov. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:24, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa: thank you Armduino (talk) 15:58, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Armduino

Thank you for creating Agreement between the United States of America and the Russian Federation Concerning the Safe and Secure Transportation, Storage and Destruction of Weapons and the Prevention of Weapons Proliferation.

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 11:23, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000: thank you :) Armduino (talk) 15:58, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Canada shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Canterbury Tail talk 16:24, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Canterbury Tail: I'm puzzled by your contention. Can you justify it? Armduino (talk) 18:50, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You've added the same image to the article 3 times now, and it's been removed 3 times. You shouldn't keep re-adding the same material over and over just because you like it, that's edit warring. See the links above for further definitions of edit warring, what to do if you're reverted and how to avoid it. Canterbury Tail talk 19:25, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Canterbury Tail: The changes I made were three in number but were definitely not reverts. Each was tailored in order to make it palatable to others. I took the criticism on board and applied my subsequent edit to substantially different parts of the article. You appear to have noticed only the number of times my byline was listed on the "view history" page and to have seen red. That was in no way "edit warring". Armduino (talk) 23:23, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Vladislav Surkov

added a link pointing to Leonid Slutsky

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Resolute Support Mission has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 22:05, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the references that you have added need to be clean up at Foreign relations of Bulgaria. See the References-section to see which ones. Thanks. --Semsûrî (talk) 10:54, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Semsûrî: thanks for this remark. I have now fixed a typo to your satisfaction. Armduino (talk) 11:09, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Operation Allies Refuge

added a link pointing to Hohenfels

Resolute Support Mission

added a link pointing to Foreign Affairs Committee

Russian Navy

added a link pointing to Korolyov

Vyacheslav Volodin

added a link pointing to Prisma

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Just a quick point- you recently reverted me a few times. This doesn't feel very nice. After reverting me you then edited the text you had reverted. If you just added your edited text rather than reverting first, and then editing it would feel less agressive. Happy editing! ♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ ^{♥ Talk ♥} 18:42, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Aeroflot

added a link pointing to Rossiya

Aviastar-TU

added a link pointing to Rossiya

Azur Air

added a link pointing to Rossiya

Belavia

added a link pointing to Rossiya

Marco Mendicino

added a link pointing to Bill Blair

Rossiya Airlines

added a link pointing to Rossiya

Royal Canadian Mounted Police

added a link pointing to Bill Blair

Utair

added a link pointing to Rossiya

William J. S. Elliott

added a link pointing to PMO

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

An article you recently created,

Hello! There's a problem with some of your changes to Bulgarian Navy - changing the section titles and title levels creates the impression that the Cold War-era structure of the navy is the current one (including decommissioned equipment) and orphans the "Naval equipment" section in an awkward pace. Note that now there's both "Command structure" and "Structure" sections right next to each other. Please fix those issues. Daggerstab (talk) 12:10, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Daggerstab: thanks for your comments. I'm unsure how to proceed. For example in the history section "Cold War era" precedes "Since independence". I'm not a fan of lists posing as text in "Command structure" and "Structure" so I would nuke most of them both. But they may serve a useful purpose to some other readers so I left those in for others to disentangle. Have you any suggestions? Armduino (talk) 12:50, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

At the very least, a temporary fix would be to demote the Cold War structure section back to a sub-section of the Cold War section - this way the article at least won't be misinforming readers, until someone does a more comprehensive cleanup and/or rewrite of the article. Also, "independence" is not the right word for that section title anyway - Bulgaria has been formally independent since 1908. Perhaps it should be something like "Post-Cold War" or "Post-Cold War and membership in NATO" or something similar. Daggerstab (talk) 14:21, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Daggerstab: I have it: a better section title has to do with the Warsaw Pact. I'll look at incorporating Cold War structure back into Cold War history. Armduino (talk) 14:29, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

National Guard of Russia

added links pointing to Aleksandr Popov, Nikolai Markov and Sergei Zakharov

David Angell (diplomat)

added a link pointing to Minister of National Defence

Vladimir Potanin

added a link pointing to FTO

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:42, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

2022 Russian war censorship laws

added a link pointing to Bucha

Alexander Lebedev

added a link pointing to National Housing Corporation

David Angell (diplomat)

added a link pointing to Minister of National Defence

National Guard of Russia

added a link pointing to Sergei Zakharov

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

Yes, @Super Dromaeosaurus: the "Chornobaivka attacks" are in fact a siege. As I've tried to tell in my edit log summary "According to Siege, "Siege warfare is a form of constant, low-intensity conflict characterized by one party holding a strong, static, defensive position." This is the case with Chornobaivka."

I'll leave you with a question: do the November 2015 Paris attacks and the 2022 Chornobaivka attacks have anything in common? If so, please describe the similarities. Or should we change the definition of Siege to fit your vexatious ideas? Armduino (talk) 04:37, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

According to the article Siege: "A siege is a military blockade of a city, or fortress, with the intent of conquering by attrition, or a well-prepared assault." "A siege occurs when an attacker encounters a city or fortress that cannot be easily taken by a quick assault, and which refuses to surrender." Not the case of Chornobaivka. Super Ψ Dro 06:29, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PRAXIDICAE🌈 15:21, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Deb: I am surprised you think the Sinomine Resources Group page "to be promotional". I'm concerned that not enough time passed between the nomination for speedy deletion at 15:21, 22 July 2022 and your unconditional deletion at 17:45, 22 July 2022 (ie around two and a half hours) to let me contest the nomination. Shouldn't we have a chance to discuss the merits and make changes to this page to address everyone's concerns? It was deleted in record time and with no opportunity to go through the process. Don't you agree, @Praxidicae:? Armduino (talk) 20:04, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's called speedy deletion for a reason. Who is "we"? PRAXIDICAE🌈 20:07, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Evidently, "we" is you and I and the rest of the community. I'm puzzled and surprised at your actions and would like to discuss them with reference to the text. Under three hours seems hasty because I had no chance to rebut your claim. Armduino (talk) 06:41, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You went wrong right on the second sentence. Saying that a company calls itself the best is little different from saying that it is the best. Perhaps you intended sarcasm, but then why mention it at all? If you had not finished writing the initial article and would like to try again, please use draft space to prepare the article or include the "under construction" tag. Deb (talk) 07:15, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Per

Russian 2022 war censorship laws

added a link pointing to

Sergei Fedotov

Ukraine Contact Group

added a link pointing to Chief of Staff of the Air Force

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

RCA 1802

added a link pointing to DMA

Russian 2022 war censorship laws

added a link pointing to

Sergei Fedotov

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you revert[3] my AWB edit to Resistor?

The purpose of my edit was to use the canonical form of {{Cite web}}{{Cite news}}, rather than a redirect, to facilitate various searches used in cleanup of refs. Why restore the redirect? BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:22, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @BrownHairedGirl: because cite article has the doi field and the cite web does not, and a power tool allows the filling in of the cite article type without needless human intervention. Armduino (talk) 23:27, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Armduino: {{Cite article}} is a redirect to {{Cite news}}, so there is no difference in functionality.

I will restore my edit, because your revert was pointless. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:35, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@BrownHairedGirl: There may be no difference in functionality from the wiki point of view, but before you go too far, have you investigated the Citation bot to examine whether or not that tool keys on the "article" type and ignores lesser types such as Cite news? I'm rather shocked by your declaration and unilateral reversion. I thought we were having a discussion on the subject and would come to some sort of consensus. Or am I unfamiliar with how wiki works. Armduino (talk) 08:32, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Armduino: yes, you are unfamiliar with how wiki works.

{{Cite news}} is not the lesser type. It is the normal form, and {{Cite article}} is a rare alias. (Compare: 433 transclusions of the redirect Cite article versus 1,378,670 transclusions of Cite news. They have exactly the same effect, but tools are much less likely to recognise any of the many aliases. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:35, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

no @BrownHairedGirl: you are likely unfamiliar with how coding and algorithms work so if you haven't knowledge of how the particular piece of code for Citation bot works I'm afraid your assurances are worth exactly nothing and I would feel much better if you left my original changes as they were. Armduino (talk) 13:11, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Armduino: that comment is obnoxious to the point offensiveness, and plain wrong. I am very familiar with how coding works (after over 40 years of coding), and I know how this stuff works. I also have 16 years experience on Wikipedia, and almost a thousand times more edits than you.

You, however, are wholly mistaken about how the templates work, and your insults to me are intolerable. Please stop this now. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:17, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry @BrownHairedGirl: when did I insult you? Your conduct is close to becoming intolerable. Please calm down and take a few deep breaths before you do anything too rash. I continue to maintain that your self-assurance seems mistaken in this case and I would feel much better if you left my original changes as they were. As an alternative, you could comb through the Citation bot code and produce results here that support your claim that it is agnostic as to the changes that you propose. Armduino (talk) 13:25, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Armduino: you insulted me by assuming that I knew nothing about coding or algorithms. Why? Because I am a woman?

And you still don't see how insulting that is.

The fact is that I run several bots, and I write a lot of code to deal with these templates on Wikipedia, nearly every day. And no, I am not going to comb through the Citation bot code just to demonstrate to falsity of your wilful ignorance.

Citation bot is maintained by @AManWithNoPlan, who I will ask to kindly confirm what I have been saying: that using the canonical name of a template does not impede Citation bot. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:33, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"using the canonical name of a template does not impede Citation bot" is correct. Also "Cite article" should NEVER be used. Some editors think it means journal, while others newspapers, and yet others magazine. AManWithNoPlan (talk) 13:36, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Black Sea Grain Initiative shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:39, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please review

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:27, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that after our chat above about your revert, I nominated {{Cite article}} for deletion.

WP:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 3#Template:Cite_article formed a consensus to delete that ambiguous redirect, and it is now gone. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:44, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Great news @BrownHairedGirl: Now you can nominate the deletion of cite journal from the wiki interface. Let me know how that goes! Armduino (talk) 17:38, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Armduino: that is a stupid and disruptive idea. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:40, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aluminium Plant Podgorica, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CEAC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:20, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, @Liz: I found Category:Naval history of Russia and omitted to delete the other category. Thanks for the help! Armduino (talk) 17:34, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from United Nations General Assembly Resolution ES-11/1 into Russia and the United Nations. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:03, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Economy of Kazakhstan

added links pointing to IFC and Chevron

Mykhailo Podolyak

added a link pointing to Bucha

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Economy of Kazakhstan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IFC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NATO operation has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:45, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Moscovite-Novgorodian Wars. Thanks! BuySomeApples (talk) 20:29, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Magnovvig per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Magnovvig. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  firefly ( t · c ) 10:49, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Crimea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page In extremis.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moscovite-Novgorodian Wars, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

JeBonSer ^{(talk | sign)} 09:57, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]