User talk:ImYourTurboLover

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:54, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is far too early to call an end to his Twitch career. True, his channel is unavailable at this moment, but the news was covered in the article. Many channels have come back from bans and suspensions, so let's be careful. BTW, thanks for adding that catchphrase. Cheers, --SVTCobra (talk) 02:19, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Deaths of Christopher Stewart and Deanna Rivers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A

WP:EVENT

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cabayi (talk) 06:53, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deaths of Christopher Stewart and Deanna Rivers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deaths of Christopher Stewart and Deanna Rivers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cabayi (talk) 22:23, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fetus deletus. Since you had some involvement with the Fetus deletus redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes (talk) 21:50, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Citation NOT needed has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. - Linneris (talk) 10:06, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Human stretching anus with both hands.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Plinuckment (talk) 01:04, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I saw you added

Ahmaud Arbery was not lynched, he reached for the shotgun and accidentally shot himself, remove this from the list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.199.147.143 (talk) 01:43, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No. ImYourTurboLover (talk) 05:11, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Get started at User:HeartGlow30797/CVUA/ImYourTurboLover! Heart ^(talk) 01:23, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Everywhere, an empty bliss is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Everywhere, an empty bliss until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect George Floyd/. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 22#George Floyd/ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Talk 05:26, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Total Eclipse of the Heart, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 13:30, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

When you leave warning templates at user talks where the revert was executed by another editor there could be conflicts. I had different plans for that user that were interrupted by your template. Tiderolls 17:20, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ImYourTurboLover. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Eternal Shadow Talk 17:34, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ImYourTurboLover! Your additions to

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double
  inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners
  , for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images.
  non-free content criteria
  in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Also, I'm unclear as to why you added the flowchart to the article to begin with; how does it improve the article? Thank you. DonIago (talk) 17:06, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You've made the same two edits on this page that have been reverted. The addition doesn't conform to the section and you haven't explained your changes. If you feel like these edits should stay please proceed to TALK where it's being discussed. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! - Nemov (talk) 15:57, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the

page-specific restrictions

, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the

guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here

. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about

page-specific restrictions

, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the

guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here

. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

nableezy - 17:53, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gpkp was:

This submission is not adequately supported by

Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Baofeng (company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Baofeng (company), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gpkp [u • t • c] 06:11, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

You at least find me amusing. 120.22.42.244 (talk) 16:21, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The page

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fulton County Mugshot of Donald Trump.png

Thanks for uploading File:Fulton County Mugshot of Donald Trump.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Warningbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:57, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Illmatic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nike.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:40, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello. I've reverted this edit per

Hello, I'm NoobThreePointOh. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Massachusetts have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 22:59, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]