User talk:Justlettersandnumbers/old6

Note: This talk-page archive covers all of 2020. Older archives are:

• all of 2019
• all of 2018
• most of 2016 and 2017
• about July 2014 until mid-January 2016
• from when I first started editing until about July 2014.

But I often delete stuff from my talk, so none of these pages is complete.

Happy New Year!

Justlettersandnumbers,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Help out at CCI! 12:51, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Hello,

in reply to:

Reverted to revision 931121767 by Ceyockey: WP:COI/WP:PAID editors are STRONGLY DISCOURAGED ....

I am not, and never have been, paid to edit any page on Wikipedia. --Dr. Brendan Allison — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bzallison (talk • contribs) 05:54, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - I am not, and never have been, paid to edit any page on Wikipedia. Natalie Ross — Preceding unsigned comment added by NatalieRoss (talk • contribs) 12:06, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't create the article. Anyways, would you please take it to AfD instead of removing it from mainspace? Peregrine Fisher (talk) 20:59, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BURDEN is now on you to show that he is notable. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:23, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

I've finished editing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conquest_of_Shewa/Temp would you care to move that here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conquest_of_Shewa, hopefully, there shouldn't be a copyright issue any longer.Yacoob316 (talk) 22:44, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for letting me know about the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. I was unaware of this rule, and have added the mandatory information onto my user page. Please accept my apologies. I hope it is clear I was changing factual information, as opposed to adding "marketing" material. In future I will suggest additions and amends in the talk page for London College of Communication. Jakemay89 (talk) 15:35, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Jakemay89, that'll be fine. Unfortunately the article has been plagued by inappropriate editing for many years, and I had to spend some time cleaning it up. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:51, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation and resolution is discussed at User talk:RMCD bot#Malfunctioning bot – wbm1058 (talk) 23:22, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NP, Wbm1058! I wasn't able to work out what the problem was, but deleting the talk-pages didn't seem to be the solution. Glad to hear it's fixed. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:11, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I really appreciate your guidance and thank you for moving my article in draft section Lufdelhi (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You are invited to join the Help out at CCI! 00:40, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply ]

Hi, before deleting Template:WikiProject Akwa Ibom, did you check that it was no longer in use? According to this tool, it has 270 transclusions. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:44, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Redrose64! Well, I thought I had, but obviously not. I've restored it for now, now to see whether I made the same mistake elsewhere. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:55, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What's the plan for these pages? I believe as a geographic region, Category:Akwa Ibom State stubs is still a valid category. Frietjes (talk) 15:36, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Frietjes, I agree with that, and have restored Template:Akwaibom-stub. I don't see that either it or the category was specifically covered by the consensus at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Akwa Ibom. Thanks for bringing it up, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:48, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You left me a question and I'm a newbie and couldn't figure out where to respond, so I'll try here. I added the "formerly Oppland" and reference on Jan 2, 2020 with mixed feelings. I deleted it earlier today with mixed feelings. It is definitely still true, but I just thought it was too much clutter and was too confusing to have and redundant (since the Innlandet link explains it) and so I deleted it. I'm glad you responded and I'll just leave it in. I'm still just 50/50 on whether it adds much to the article. Thanks again for your input.Redriv (talk) 02:54, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking the trouble to reply,

Madras, for example) is to mention the former name also. But clutter is a thing too! Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:11, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Why, it was linked from the {{

Should be OK now, SD0001 – I've moved the archive back to the title the bot settings expect. No idea why it was redirected in 2016 ... If there's still a problem please let me know. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:17, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Just saw that you deleted Draft:Nina Kiraly because of copyright infringement of http://www.kiralyfoundation.com The thing is I have created kiralyfoundation.com, I am the daughter of Nina Kiraly and own all rights, trying to create an English page where her international collaborators and students can learn more about her work and legacy. A page in her name in Hungarian already exists but since she also published books by international artists as well as her own articles in English, it would be important to have this page. Her Hungarian page can be found here: https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kir%C3%A1ly_Nina Please, let me know how I can resubmit for consideration. Thank s a lot! (Annakiraly1 (talk) 04:31, 21 January 2020 (UTC))[reply]

this page. After you email OTRS you will (or should!) receive a reply with a long number in the subject field. If you give me that number (here), I'll see what can be done. Can I assume that you've already made some sort of appropriate disclosure of your conflict of interest? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:57, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi, my newly created page was deleted because of an "G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of https://thedagenhamyanks.com/bio", I am the owner of this page and the author of it's contents, I want to create a page that explains "The Dagenham Yanks", who they are and where the name derived from, can you or I resubmit or explain any changes I need to make make it acceptable for resubmission please.--Jfaoc (talk) 15:46, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

disclosure is obligatory. I received your email, and hope this reply is a sufficient answer. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:57, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Justlettersandnumbers, The ticket number is: 2020012110007164, I am not aware of any conflict of interest; with the topic and my connection to this topic is not renumerated in any way. --Jfaoc (talk) 16:55, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just to point that out, this is not at all "notification done with the intention of influencing the outcome of a discussion in a particular way". You've already said you didn't agree with the presence of the Italian pronunciation, and I'm not trying to make you change your mind, I told you. This is the last message I write here because I don't want to disturb you but this was a thing it was necessary to point out not to let you have a wrong idea about this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.64.160.76 (talk) 20:11, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for the review. I'm sorry to contact you late. The text of the draft page has been deleted due to advice. Thank you.

I have replied to your answer at the help desk. review of submission by Castor KakuWakako I will add a little more detail here.

At the time of the first post, there was certainly copyright infringement. Quoted text. I thought it would be good to indicate the referring page, but it seems wrong. Currently, we have removed the quoted text.

However, the wiki has indicated in the Copyvios report that copyright infringement is still ongoing. If you look at the details of the point where copyright infringement is pointed out, almost all are Japanese proper nouns (work title, publisher name, author name).

Here is the list: (the genre of proper nouns)

• Poetry (Category Name)
• Zero ni naru karada (Content Title)
• Tokuma Shoten, Tokyo, 2002 (Publisher Name)
• Umi no youna otona ni naru (Content Title)
• I Will Be a Grown-up Like the Sea (Content Title Translation)
• co-authored with Shuntaro Tanikawa and Akira Sato, (About co-authored)
• Froebel Kan Tokyo, 2008 (Publisher Name)
• Hugtime translation from English originally written by Patrick McDonnel (Credit Notation)
• translation from English originally written by (Credit Notation)
• GT Music, Tokyo (Publisher name)
• Wakako Kaku's official fan site (Music Label)
• official website of Yah Chayka! (I, Seagull) (Content Title & Content Title Meaning)
• a film Wakako Kaku co-directed with poet Shuntaro Tanikawa (Credit Notation)

What should we do about such copyright infringement?

Also, the text of the Draft: Wakako_Kaku page has been deleted, but it can be restored at any time. Castor KakuWakako (talk) @ 07:40:34, 23 January 2020(UTC)

Answer other reply.

1: You said " Was the content in fact translated from here? If so, you must provide attribution."^[1]

Yes. Translated from this page. And we add shortage. That's right. Lack of respect for pre-translation articles. Specify attribution. Thank you for your advice.

2: Initially, I repeatedly published articles about copyright infringement. That's because I misunderstood that I was solving the problem myself. And in the next phase, to understand what the problem is. I posted a draft article with the purpose of knowing what is wrong, what to check, who to contact and how to contact it. That was also to confirm the aggregated alert box.

Your advice has greatly advanced my understanding. Thank you for your cooperation. I understand what information to check and what text to save. So I was able to delete the draft page text. However, I still feel that the behavior is incorrect. Encourage understanding. Castor KakuWakako (talk) @ 09:14:48, 23 January 2020(UTC)

I know it violated the stated rule, but it did say it was to be kept for humorous reference and not to be deleted. That page has been here longer than your account. It was not okay to delete it; that page has been worked on for 12-13 years. RSVP Heroe Of Time (talk) 08:10, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) I have to agree with Heroe Of Time here. That was a bad U5 tagging and a bad deletion. U5 requires that the owner "has made few or no edits outside of user pages". Littleghostboo has made more than 600+ edits outside userspace. I suggest you revert your deletion because I really don't think we need to start a DRV here. Regards SoWhy 10:47, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Justlettersandnumbers. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of ENCI, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: nl-wiki article indicates that subject might be significant, also has sources. Thank you. SoWhy 13:47, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Er, SoWhy, what nl.wp does is their business. This is the English-language Wikipedia, and the page here has no sources and no indication of significance. Are you sure you've read the criterion correctly? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:00, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of sources is not a reason for deletion. Also, we are not robots, are we? A7 is meant to remove articles about unquestionably insignificant and unimportant subjects, not articles about notable companies that might currently be lacking in sources but

WP:AFD. Regards SoWhy 14:20, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

(Driving by...) I don't know the standards for paid editing on nl.wiki, but the article looks to me like a puff piece on a company, and I've seen drafts rejected for less. Might be worth an AfD if notability doesn't rise to

WP:NCOMPANY. Montanabw^(talk) 00:31, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

JLAN, I just noticed (thanks to a series of bad anon IP edits) that you have created a number of new horse breed articles that have not been added to the List of horse breeds. Given that you know what you have created from scratch, I'd appreciate it if either you could add them to the List article or at least somehow point me to them, perhaps a list on the talkpage of the list article that I can insert where they belong? Given that this is our only overview of all articles on wikipedia that are bluelinked, it is useful to keep it up to date. I added the breeds off of Template:Horse breeds of Belgium and Luxembourg and may have time to look at a couple others, but if you can help me out, I'd be grateful. Many thanks. Montanabw^(talk) 00:26, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a few from the last year or so. I keep a list of pages I've created here, but I don't update it often (just done it, no chance I'd have remembered them otherwise!). Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:58, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi colleague,

I am the editor of the section "Polymathy in Academia". While I agree that a Master's Thesis may not be considered a reliable source (although it can be according to wikipedia's guidelines), that section has nothing to do with the thesis. I think that removing it is depriving readers from the state of the art research on the field. Although noble in intent, the deletion has the practical effect of downplaying serious academic work while highlighting non-academic sources and opinions.

After checking this: Wikipedia:Reliable_sources

one can easily confirm that the text clearly is not a new synthesis. Nor does it provide a conclusion "not explicitly stated by any of the sources". Just quickly check the sources, which are all published in peer-reviewed sources except for the last one, which is a Doctoral dissertation. The latter was only added due to the dearth of scholarly research and because it does offer a contribution to the field according to several leading scholars.

Wikipedia's guidelines on "new syntheses":

"Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources. Similarly, do not combine different parts of one source to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by the source. If one reliable source says A, and another reliable source says B, do not join A and B together to imply a conclusion C that is not mentioned by either of the sources. This would be improper editorial synthesis of published material to imply a new conclusion, which is original research performed by an editor here.[i] "A and B, therefore C" is acceptable only if a reliable source has published the same argument in relation to the topic of the article. If a single source says "A" in one context, and "B" in another, without connecting them, and does not provide an argument of "therefore C", then "therefore C" cannot be used in any article."

MikeAraki (talk) 17:01, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You appear to have deleted

Done that, Kingboyk – and you are right of course, your dummy edit preceded the tagging. Not sure if that was my mistake or a glitch in the script – I'm pretty sure I checked that the tag was green, and so did not examine the history. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:43, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for looking at the resubmitted draft article I wrote about Steve Mahabir. I have two question about why the submission was declined. First, your comment was that "a substantial part of the page is completely unsourced." Which section(s) are you referring to? Second, the whole "Career" section is empty. Did you do this or did I not resubmit it properly? Hollander1961 (talk) 19:38, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Hollander1961! So, you're talking about Draft:Steve Mahabir? No, it wasn't I who blanked the copyvio section, later removed it, or hid that part of the history from view, those three things were done by three other editors; you can see their names by looking at the revision history. You were told about the copyright problem on 10 December on your talk-page.

The material I was talking about when I said "unsourced" is everything that does not have a relevant

independent reliable source); it seemed (and still seems) to me that that applies to a large part of what is in the page. Please note that stuff like this and this (two copies of the same promotional press-release on different websites) is neither independent nor reliable. If you have more questions I suggest you visit the Teahouse – I'll leave you an invitation in one moment. Good luck! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:18, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

You've already had a Teahouse invitation, it seems. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:20, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Justlettersandnumbers:,

You can now re-nominate, without fear of reversion,

Cheers,
--Doug Mehus T·C 02:06, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wikipedia Editor I am the subject of the article "Lydia Kakabadse". I noticed from your comments last month that the article has multiple issues and I would be most grateful if you could perhaps show me how they may be improved/resolved. I look forward to hearing from you, Yours sincerely Lemdee (talk) 19:29, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

here, which may be helpful. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:39, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Thank you for your assistance, it's so helpful. Please see below 6 links to independent reliable sources which give details about my life as a composer and my works: https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b051zxlf this link confirms that my string quartet "Russian Tableaux" was broadcast on BBC Radio 3 for International Women's Day on 8 March 2015 and 5 March 2017. Could you please therefore reinstate "Her chamber work "Russian Tableaux" was broadcast on BBC Radio 3 to mark International Women's Day in 2015 and 2017". https://divineartrecords.com/recording/ithaka-vocal-and-choral-works-by-lydia-kakabadse/ this link to Divine Art Records gives details of my latest choral album "Ithaka". If you scroll down to "Reviews" you will see all reviews for that album. Reviews of my other works, released by Divine Art can be found on their website under "Cantica Sacra" and "Concertato". https://www.naxos.com/person/Lydia_Kakabadse/125097.htm this link to Naxos gives details of me as a composer. https://www.royalholloway.ac.uk/media/11339/odyssey.pdf this link is to Royal Holloway's "Odyssey" concert programme. Odyssey was commissioned by Royal Holloway and premiered at Royal Holloway Chapel. It includes a short biography. https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=lydia+kakabadse&view=detail&mid=C5CA93889DA69F69422FC5CA93889DA69F69422F&FORM=VIRE this link is to the annual celebrity Breast Cancer Care Show (London) which (see 2.47 mins) introduces my composition to be performed at the event. https://www.banksmusicpublications.co.uk/lydia-kakabadse this link is to Banks Music Publications (choral music specialists). It appears that someone has incorrectly amended the sentence regarding my works being performed at the Three Choirs Festival. It should read: "Two short pieces were included in the Three Choirs Festival Eucharist in 2019". Could you please amend accordingly. Could you also please explain the copyright violation issues. I am not aware of copying any material not being in the public domain or not having copyright holder's permission. Many thanks for your time, Kind Regards,Lemdee (talk) 13:04, 7 February 2020 (UTC) Sorry - I forgot to also add that one of my chamber works "Concertato" was performed at the Chatsworth Arts Festival 20 Sept 2019 by the Chineke! Chamber Ensemble. Please see link: https://www.chineke.org/events/chatsworth Thanks and Kind Regards, Lemdee (talk) 14:39, 7 February 2020 (UTC) Dear Editor, when you get a chance, could you please get back to me re my posts of 7 February? Lemdee (talk) 10:15, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I see that the page John Krubsack has be deleted but can't seem to find out why other than a vague issue about copyright. Also can't find any of the pages that should have been talking about the deletion to see what the issue with it was. I don't want to recreate the article again until I find out what was wrong with the last one. Could you please enlighten me as to what was the issue/s and where is the deletion pages/discussions are for both John Krubsack and related talk pages. Thanks Blackash (talk) 19:54, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

GFDL was received in 2009 for text copied into the article from a book by Richard Reames, but that licence was at the time no longer acceptable here, and the permission should not have been accepted; the text was effectively a copyright violation. I deleted the page about a month later as all revisions of the page were affected, and no viable rewrite had been proposed. You are welcome to re-create it; I can restore the skeleton of the article (infobox, images, categories, references, but no running text) if that would be helpful – just let me know. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:31, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi, Thanks for this info. Could you please restore the skeleton of the article to my sandbox page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Blackash/sandbox Blackash (talk) 11:32, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blackash, I've restored it, but for attribution reasons have put it at User:Blackash/John Krubsack, hope that works too. When it's ready for mainspace you can move it (or ask someone else to), which will preserve the earlier history of the page. Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:59, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's great thank you. Blackash (talk) 15:25, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I am extremely sorry for messing up with acceptances/rejections on AFCPending. I clearly understand that I may have disrupted the work of experienced editors; However, My Intention was not to disrupt wikipedia's standards.

I'll wait out, learn more about AFC and when I meet the minimum requirements - would reach out to start helping again :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quantumdots-X (talk • contribs) 12:19, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Justlettersandnumbers: I drafted this article several days ago. Would you have a look at it please?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Mohammed_Suhail_Chinya_Salimpasha quantumdots-x (talk) 19:10, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

He's back here [2] and at multiple other WPs and Wikidata as 151.20.125.224. Also as Giudice71 at Commons. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Giudice71

Articles here to be watched: Gisella Donadoni, Michele Cifarelli, and Imperial Knight.

Best, Voceditenore (talk) 18:31, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, VdT! Well, of course it couldn't last ... Yes, I saw your revert at Imperial Knight, and blocked that IP yesterday for a good long time. It has a good number of edits on it.wp as you've presumably seen, not sure who to alert now that AttoRenato is no longer active. Vituzzu, is this something you might have time to look at (block evasion by globally-locked editor)? Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:01, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Even worse than the edits on Italian WP, are his extensive and no doubt spurious/erroneous edits to WikiData [3]. The alter egos of 151.20.125.224, i.e. 151.20.21.172 and 151.20.7.153 were blocked for a week on Wikidata in 2018 and for 3 months in 2019 and all edits there reverted. I'm minded to leave a message on their equivalent of ANI about this new incarnation.

Meanwhile, another sock account, User:ProvinciaArchiv, has appeared at Commons (no edits here yet). See Commons:Deletion requests/File:ALDO NATOLI.jpg. And another utterly non-notable Lierna personality to watch —Giorgio Buizza (deleted on Italian WP but surviving on the Esperanto one). Best, Voceditenore (talk) 09:05, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Update: See Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard#Reporting 151.20.125.224. And a new filing at Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Alec Smithson. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 10:33, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The socks at Commons (User:ProvinciaArchiv and User:Giudice71) have been indef blocked there. The IP has now been blocked for 6 months at Wikidata. I've again reminded them to check and/or mass revert his edits as none of them can be trusted. Not sure if they'll bother—one of the big problems with Wikidata. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 09:11, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I saw that, VdT – I went to add my 2p where necessary, and saw that it wasn't needed. I wish I knew whether a global rollback would be able/prepared to mass-revert each of these socks as they come along – perhaps I'll ask. Thanks yet again for keeping on top of this, regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:43, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Something on my watchlist led me to

Hi,

ThatMontrealIP! Well, that's quite funny – but hard to believe they changed their website because of something I wrote? I'm still sure it isn't the kind of source we should be using, any more than those other paid-content sites masquerading as edited content – artsy, artnet, the fake Saatchi (saatchiart?) and so on. There seem to be more than 200 links to Ocula (plus about 40 to the http: address), so removing them would be quite a task. I suppose the best thing would be to see if consensus can be established to deprecate these damned things. I'll look at the contribs of those two editors; in general, if you see anyone spamming this or any other website, do let me know. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:59, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, Justlettersandnumbers,

I had a question from two editors about a page you redirected which was subsequently deleted. Could you respond at my talk page? I wanted to hear from you before restoring the page. Thank you very much. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:06, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @

Yes,

FelixtheNomad, I deleted it as "a page that was previously deleted via a deletion discussion, is substantially identical to the deleted version, and any changes do not address the reasons for which the material was deleted". I saw your contestation, but was not convinced by it; in particular, the Times source you "found" was already in the article when it was previously discussed and deleted. You can if you wish list it for review at WP:Deletion review. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:05, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi, thanks for your response. Can you please, in the meantime, share the draft with me, so I can work on it, dig deeper, and if I find more sources for it, publish it through AfC? Thanks!

talk) 15:11, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

These are the sources:

1. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/golden-horse-is-mane-attraction-zkwwv7ncqjn (unique genes and coat colour)
2. https://pegasus-magazine.co.uk/pearl-of-peace-the-gold-andalusian-stallion/
3. https://www.horsetalk.co.nz/2013/11/22/gene-genie-britains-golden-boy/
4. https://www.allbreedpedigree.com/pearl+of+peace+ev (pedigree)
5. https://www.lgancce.com/lgpreancce/asp-publico/arbolGenealogicoPRE/ConsultarArbolGenealogicoPRE.aspx?ID=XbxrT25wQsk= (pedigree)
6. https://blog.petlondon.net/2016/02/06/pearl-of-peace-for-harpers-baazar/ (feature in James Bond movie)
7. https://www.horsedeals.com.au/listings/pearl-of-peace-ev-graded-andalusian-pre-stallion
8. https://www.horse-photographer.co.uk/pearl-of-peace/
9. https://simplebooklet.com/publish.php?wpKey=d9B7fIcscxmGkSQfVkIR8K (page 109 and 113 - image feature)

• I just saw your reply at the Teahouse, could you at least share the draft you deleted with
  FelixtheNomad. thanks, Rodrigo Valequez (talk) 19:05, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Hello, Justlettersandnumbers, I just added the modifications you recommended about the translation. Since I have a conflict of interest about the topic, I'm not supposed to move the page from draft to article, is that correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gaheris fils de lot (talk • contribs) 14:54, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Gaheris fils de lot, that's right. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:39, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, as you saw I am fairly new to Wikipedia. I am not getting paid and only wanted to try myself at creating an article from scratch and of course focused on something that I know about. Honestly I don't think I'll do it again. It's been too burdensome. I do want to thank you and the other experienced users for all your help, I've been trying to act on your feedback and advice through out the process. I think I'll focus on historical subjects for now, I hope there will be less issues. I've got a really good book about the different Norman conquests I'm reading right now that should provide some good encyclopedic material. Please feel free to delete the whole thing if you think it's not worthy material, I'll let other users take over if they think it's worthy materialGaheris fils de lot (talk) 22:43, 3 March 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gaheris fils de lot (talk • contribs) 22:40, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why you are so obsessed with trying to remove my contributions to the Cirque du Soleil show pages I've edited in the past due to "copyright issues and unsourced material". I recommend you stop blaming me for "bringing up unsourced material" on those pages. Also, I need to mention that there are no copyright issues on the Corteo page, and that you need to bring back the revisions that you deleted from the Toruk – The First Flight page. Besides, you and Dorsetonian's actions towards the Cirque du Soleil community are unacceptable.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Matthew250 (talk • contribs) 00:07, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

here. But you might discover that other editors find that what is really unacceptable is the long-term campaign of promotional editing of those articles by the "Cirque du Soleil community". Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:32, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi,

paid editing in two of them – a continuing concern about your edits which I see that others share. I've no objection to any other admin restoring them, of course. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:59, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Thank you for your respond,

Sock puppetry case. Chris Calvin (talk) 18:23, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello! I am writting to you regarding the Dewesoft Draft you have deleted from my sandbox (31.january 2020; I haven't recived a notification about the deletion, so I am writing to you now) I am an university student and I have mandatory internship at the selected company (Dewesoft). At univerity we got the task to write a Wikipedia article about the company and brand we work whith. The article I have submitted to your site has been reviewed and approved by the professors of the university and I wish this article to be published on Wikipedia as well. I would like to resubmit the article again if you would be so kind to help me with your guidelines. I need to know which parts are problematic in the deleted draft and how can I improve in writting this submission. If it's possible I would also like the access to the deleted draft. With kind regards, Flavijus — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flavijus (talk • contribs) 09:26, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

promotional in tone (stuff like "committed to the highest standards of quality for development and manufacturing processes" has no place in an encyclopaedia). I can't restore a copyright violation, but I can if you wish restore the bare bones of the page – infobox, references, categories etc, but without the running text. Let me know if that would help. Oh, and please make a suitable disclosure of your conflict of interest on your user page, User:Flavijus. Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:03, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Than you for your reply and andvice! I will try to remake the whole text without using the promotional tone - I think that for that you don't have to restore the bare bones of the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flavijus (talk • contribs) 07:15, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good day @Justlettersandnumbers:! I hope you don't mind but could you please check my draft for the Hadrian Wine (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Hadrian_Wine) and advice for any possible changes. Thank you. Piero.hatria (talk) 17:38, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

notable by our standards, and – please excuse me if I speak plainly – your command of English is just not good enough to write text that can be understood without considerable effort. It also seems that you are interested only in promoting the importance of the town of Atri. Why do you not try creating these pages on Italian Wikipedia instead, where at least there would not be a language barrier? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:42, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi @Justlettersandnumbers:,

Thank you for your feedback and rest assured that I take it constructively. I will seek professional help to correct and improve my grammar and my writing style, and hopefully, my contributions will be accepted after some time. (Yes, I will also contribute to Italian, but my contributions will help more readers if I contribute in English)

About my choice of topic, yes, it's true that I am interested to contribute and write about Atri, its history and events because this is where I came from; and I know there is not enough information about Atri. I want to help to add information about this town, which might not be popular but still part of history and has interesting artifacts of ancient Roman history.

I can only write of the things that I am interested in and writing about some of Atri's history, which is not yet fully available in Wikipedia can be a good contribution.Piero.hatria (talk) 15:17, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Does this move over redirect imply that a new Wiki Ed student has pagemover rights? If so, they shouldn’t. If not, that auto-generated comment is misleading, and whatever script created it should be altered. Adding Shalor. Mathglot (talk) 14:51, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Mathglot, how are you? No, the student was able to make the move as an autoconfirmed account (4 days/10 edits), and because the history of the redirect consisted of one revision only – page mover rights were not needed (and yes indeed, a new Wiki Ed student should not have those rights). I can never understand what benefit there is in allowing very new users to move pages – in my opinion it'd be far better to bundle the page move ability with extended-confirmed status. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:11, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(

talk) 15:29, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

That's what it needed! Thanks,

ThatMontrealIP! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:38, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Hmm ... it looks as if you may have copied a (very) little from that sandbox? If that's so, the most correct thing would probably be for me to histmerge it into your page. The only difference for you would be that you'd no longer show as creator of the page. OK? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:11, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good! It did not even occur to me to consider the copying as it was so short. Thanks.

talk) 14:32, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Done that, then ... which has also dealt with the draft. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:42, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much. Now I understand "history moves".

talk) 20:58, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi, can you please partially undo this deletion ([4]) you did earlier? It was very carelessly done. It deleted not only the English translation (which appears to have been initially copied from that book), but also the Chinese characters and the transliterations thereof, which are most certainly not copyrighted. It destroyed extensive work on my part.  White Whirlwind  咨  20:32, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, White_whirlwind! No, it was not carelessness – as far as I'm aware it has not been established that the Chinese text is out of copyright, and it has been repeatedly removed from the article for copyright reasons. If you have irrefutable proof of your claim, please start a discussion on the talk-page of the article. Please don't re-add any part of the poem until such discussion has reached a conclusion. Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:40, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I just did some cleanup on

It also appears to be an autobiography, based on the former user name. Would you agree? Still notable though.

talk) 21:31, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Thank you for blocking Kristina0z (talk · contribs). I'm requesting an indefinite block, as explained at ANI. Persistent copyright violations, removal of opposing comments and personal attacks at the talk page. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 01:03, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

IP user (with two IPs) has violated 1RR and then insulted other editors at Talk:Catholic Church and abortion, see [5]. Can those IPs be blocked and their insult removed from view? Thanks. NightHeron (talk) 11:20, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done the talk-page, NightHeron, thanks for letting me know. The edit-warring by the IPv6 was yesterday, and I don't see that much purpose is served by blocking at this point; however, please tell me (or somebody) if there's any more of that – definitely not acceptable! Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:57, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. NightHeron (talk) 12:20, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See this discussion, and please review the entire TP which demonstrates a lack of response and continuation of disruption. Perhaps this is a case of a student editing? I'm at a loss for what to do. ^Atsme _Talk 📧 19:47, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Atsme! I've looked only briefly, but I see encouraging signs that the user is at least acknowledging advice/guidance received. The sort of advice I'd give to myself in a situation like this is (1) take a deep breath (2) remember that this isn't my sole responsibility and (3) but keep an eye on it anyway. I don't know if that helps at all? Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:28, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It does help, JLAN. I hated being the one to shake that editor awake but he appears to be awoke now, and that's a good thing! ^Atsme _Talk 📧 22:31, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I noticed that you deleted page of

Best regards.  MrInfo2012  Talk  21:28, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for asking, MrInfo2012! I don't see any reason why you shouldn't restart that page. Good luck! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:14, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Justlettersandnumbers Thanks for your consideration.  MrInfo2012  Talk  16:09, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have a question? Can we get back his wikipedia page content? Is there any solution for this problem?  MrInfo2012  Talk  21:17, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, MrInfo2012! Given the fairly stormy history of the page, I think it'd be preferable to create a new version from scratch. The references/external links in the page were these: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. Sorry not to be of more help, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:36, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Justlettersandnumbers: I was also thinking of creating a new article. Thanks a lot.  MrInfo2012  Talk  08:32, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, I am new to Wikipedia and I was making a page about my wife's NGO. I submitted it without AFC. Thank you for helping me out. I hope the article will be excepted.

regards Lufdelhi (talk) 15:42, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I have a question about image licenses. I created a page for a volleyball player and used a photo of him from Internet. That image was deleted because of violating copyright. I decide to buy a photo of that player. How can I use that photo on wiki? Please consider that I am the owner of that photo now because I bought it.  MrInfo2012  Talk  22:05, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again,

fair use image. I'm sorry if this isn't the answer you had hoped for; if you have questions, please ask! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:44, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks for your answer. So please tell me about copyright of these players: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and so many other photos. They don't use any copyright rules. Please tell me about them. Sorry.  MrInfo2012  Talk  23:06, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MrInfo2012, all of those images are hosted on Commons, so that would really be the place to ask about them. I took a quick look: 1 and 3 are by the same photographer and apparently uploaded by her (her name is visible in the EXIF data of the photos), 6 is definitely uploaded by the photographer, 5 also appears to be (see here); 2 and 4 have OTRS permission. I don't see any cause for concern there. As before, in general the copyright in an image belongs to the photographer, who alone can choose whether or not to licence it for general use and upload it to Commons. Under very restricted conditions, some non-free images (of book covers, for example, but never of living people) can be uploaded to Wikipedia. Does that help? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:31, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Justlettersandnumbers, I am new to editing Wikipedia, and I have a few questions regarding what I believe to be your edits to the page "Sarah Morris." If you were responsible for changing my edits to the "Exhibition", "Public Collection" and "Further Reading" section could you please explain why? The previous lists were not comprehensive, and I updated them to reflect ALL of the artist's solo exhibitions and public collections. Additionally, I created a separate section for the artist's site-specific installations, and added ones that were not previously mentioned, and this was also deleted. I also added texts to the "Further Reading" section which were deleted. I do not understand why any of these alterations were a violation of Wikipedia's copyright rules. Lastly, my edit of the "Personal Life" section provided more detail regarding the artist's education, listing the artist's major and changing "stint at Cambridge University" to instead indicate the specific years the subject spent there. Any clarification in regards to these changes would be greatly appreciated. Fetterw (talk) 15:53, 26 March 2020 (UTC)fetterw[reply]

Is this episode summary[6] too close to this one from the BBC[7]? I think so but want a second opinion. Thanks in advance....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:15, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Justlettersandnumbers, I would like to change my username from Kükenschublade to GeileHirnbude. I hope you can do that for me. Thank you!

Hi,

WP:CHU. Sorry, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:41, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi

talk) 07:14, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Sorry, Kükenschublade, I missed this, only just seen it. I'm afraid that we don't allow usernames that are websites. Could you perhaps choose a different name? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:41, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Justlettersandnumbers! I think I agree with the spirit of the rule of not allowing commercial websites. In this case, the web site is only representing me as a person, and it is not commercial. As further proof that this is just the nick name I go by, see my Twitter account.

Sorry, I too should have checked the page history on Focura or Foscura or whatever it was. Learning as I go.

Aren't we all? I thought I'd done my homework, checked that the page creator had what appeared to be an undisclosed connection to the topic, page was fully eligible ... but no, I forgot to check the history. It'll disappear soon enough in one way or another, I suppose. I completely forgot to answer you about Stephanie Comilang – I looked at the history, and saw no need for histmerge as all previous edits were by the same person (at least I think that's what I saw!); as for notability, I wasn't convinced, but time will be the test of that. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:04, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

thanks! In line with my learning about what a good G11 is, would you say

talk) 17:27, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi again,

disclose. I don't know if any of that makes things clearer or muddier ... Anyway, thanks for all your good work, regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:19, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Thank you for the very kind advice. I think the COI question for that user is relevant!

talk) 18:34, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Здравейте аз съм човека който редактира публикациите ви за Кане Корсо . Моля свържете се с мен:)Имам снимки от сайтове където пише че е над 60 килограма.Аз също имам кучета от тази порода ,защото ги развъждам.Няма как питбула да е 60 килограма според Уикипедия,а Кане Корсо да е два пъти по голямо и да пише , че е до 50 кг.Имам няколко кучета и рекордното е женско ,което е 81 килограма .Не им давам протеин ,а нямам куче под 58 килограма. !!!!!!МОЛЯ НЕ РЕДАКТИРАЙТЕ ПОВЕЧЕ ИЛИ СЕ СВЪРЖЕТЕ С МЕН КАКТО АЗ СЕ СВЪРЗВАМ С ВАС С ИНФОРМАЦИЯ . БЛАГОДАРЯ ПРЕДВАРИТЕЛНО!!!!!! Cane Corso Maik (talk) 19:56, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Защооооо Cane Corso Maik (talk) 22:28, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Блиокнаха ме за 8 дена заради теб . Моля спри :( Cane Corso Maik (talk) 22:29, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

independent reliable sources. Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:09, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

if you want to make sure you join the Cane Corso bulgaria group, all the dogs are over 60 kilograms as well as in the world groups.i breed the breed and have a record female dog it is 81 pounds because she is pregnant. before she got pregnant she was 73kg. Cane Corso Maik (talk) 20:26, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK, so we now have the subject of the article (ID verified by OTRS) providing personal details (birthdate, parents, marriage, etc) but without sources. Do we add the details with a note giving the provenance of the info or do we still need an RS that can be verified? Meters (talk) 23:31, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if that is an obvious answer, but I don't think I've ever been involved in a case where the subject was adding the personal info. Meters (talk) 23:34, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BLP policy here as everywhere else, and only include in the article information that is supported by solid independent reliable sources. At least she posted on the talk-page ... Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:20, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Many thanks for pointing out that http://srl.org/about.html had the wrong license. I think it now has the right license, could the Copyright vio template be removed from that page? On Talk:Survival_Research_Laboratories#Copyright_Violation? I proposed an edit that would remove the offending text. Let me know what steps I should take next. Thanks. Cxbrx (talk) 02:04, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Curious as to why this page was deleted not published 96lt1ss (talk) 10:46, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well,

abandoned draft and eligible for deletion for that reason too. I'll leave you an invitation to the Teahouse. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:09, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi, Carnby, and thanks! Yes, actually I did know that, but changing those has become a sort of ingrained habit now. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:36, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Justlettersandnumbers -- I'm writing to ask if you could explain about one of your edits via WikiCleanerBot, with the edit summary, "This isn't Wikiquote". I do frequently add quotes to articles -- but are you saying the quote I added in this diff is superfluous? I hope to learn how to use quotes better. Thank you! -- Cloud atlas (talk) 18:47, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good day, @Justlettersandnumbers:! I have finally changed the majority of my Vinum Hadrianum (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Hadrian_Wine) page and used the Vinum Hadrianum in Italian Wikipedia as my reference. Please see and advise. I also would like to request if you could change the title from Hadrian wine to Vinum Hadrianum. The page is meant for Vinum Hadrianum of Atri. Thank you. Piero.hatria (talk) 18:43, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for doing that UAA Block. Much appreciated. :) - Neutralhomer • Talk • 23:30 on April 24, 2020 (UTC) • #StayAtHome

Hello Justiceandnumbers. I have requested you reinstate my page which I do not agree violates any guidelines. The contributions of this music producer are noteworthy and the facts are true. Links to Gary Justice websites are there, but that does not mean the wiki page is s hosting” them does it? There is no solicitation of services.

I would like to see the page and have a chance to rebut.

If some changes are requested, that could be considered. Why so harsh to speedy delete it?

I have not heard response from my prior request for dialog on this. Gary Justice (talk) 03:45, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:AFC. If the admin restores it, I suggest to go through the AFC process and to submit it for review. By the timeline, it's likely one of many articles I tagged following this now-archived FTN thread (and the work is far from done). Thanks, —PaleoNeonate – 04:27, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi,

WP:U5). That nomination was entirely correct in my view – this is an encyclopaedia and not a social media site; material such as "new endeavours that may explode into a level of lucid expression exceeding all past efforts now that compassion and understanding of life's suffering is a felt feature of his vernacular and perspective" has no place anywhere in the project. If you disagree, you can ask for review here; or, if you wish, I can email the deleted content to you, with the understanding that no part of it will re-appear in Wikipedia. Please let me know. Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:58, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Since your email is active, I've sent it anyway. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:02, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your help Paleo. Gary Justice (talk) 19:13, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed that when you speedily deleted that article, you didn't close the deletion discussion as speedy delete. Username⁶⁸⁹² 21:42, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reminder, Username6892, now done. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:12, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. This is an invitation to join the

Hi Justlettersandnumbers, I would like to engage in a dialogue with you regarding your repeated deletion of all of my edits to this page. I find it frustrating to have all of the edits deleted en masse, when I have taken particular care to use reputable sources and cite everything properly. If you're identifying the writing as pretentious, I would appreciate your deleting specific sentences rather than removing all of the edits I've made to the page, some of which have nothing to do with the style of writing; changes such as enhancing the further reading section, providing a comprehensive list of the artist's exhibition and collection history. These edits make the wikipedia more accurate and I see no reason why they should be deleted. Rather than reverting the page to your previous version, I would appreciate a more thorough consideration of the changes I've made. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fetterw (talk • contribs) 17:30, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

paid to edit there. Once you've done that, please feel free to start a discussion on the talk-page of the article, as I've already suggested in this edit summary. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:03, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks for your response. To be clear, I have no connection to the artist. I am a graduate student in Art History and Sarah Morris was the focus of a recent term paper. This was my first foray into Wikipedia editing, and I felt that her page needed to be updated and expanded. I will bring this discussion to the Talk Page, but I do find your total repudiation of the updates I provided to be unproductive; particularly, the removal of the additions I provided to various lists on the artist's page. These updates only make the page more accurate, and I don't understand why there is any cause for removing them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fetterw (talk • contribs) 19:28, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I posted on the talk page of Sarah Morris as you suggested and have received no response. As it stands, the page is incomplete and does not offer an accurate reflection of the artist. Particularly, the lists of exhibitions and private collections are INCOMPLETE- my edits updated these to be comprehensive and up to date. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fetterw (talk • contribs) 14:15, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good afternoon- Looking for some info- can you please tell me why you moved the education information for the above-referenced article? Thank you for any help! Jcollinsycc (talk) 18:57, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(

edit summary for that edit. If you have more questions, please post them on the talk-page of the article. Please be sure to disclose your paid-editor status whenever you discuss, or make any edit relating to, any article you've been been paid to edit; please also update your user-page to make clear exactly which articles you've edited on behalf of the Yale Cancer Centre. Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:07, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Shocking news

More copyright violations at List of Murder, She Wrote episodes. I found two copied from imdb and one from tv.com[8] when I stopped looking. Would you like to take care of this page again?...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:32, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My edit to Italian Mediterranean buffalo

Hi Justlettersandnumbers, I noticed you reverted my edit to Italian Mediterranean buffalo where I made "Campania" link to its article. It must be aggravating to have someone disregard your clear instructions not to link it. I'm sorry. On the other hand, The Wikipedia Manual of Style says, "Generally, a link should appear only once in an article, but if helpful for readers, a link may be repeated in infoboxes, tables, image captions, footnotes, hatnotes, and at the first occurrence after the lead." I want to put the link back in the table because it would be helpful to readers. Thanks, Doug4 20:29, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

It's already linked a little higher up the page, Doug4. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:34, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It would still be helpful to have it in the table so that readers would not have to look for a previous link. Some readers might have jumped to the "Population" section without having read the previous section of the article. Doug4 20:49, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Help with a cambridge book

Using your cambridge access, could you compare The Dynasty of Chernigov, 1146–1246 by Martin Dimnick to Yaroslav II Vsevolodovich? The article is part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Borsoka, where the editor copied exclusively from book sources. Thanks, Moneytrees🌴^{Talk🌲Help out at CCI!} 21:31, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Aarggh, I wish I could, Moneytrees! – I carelessly lost my Cambridge access a while ago, and have never been able to find it again (I can log in OK, I just can't actually look at anything). But all is not lost ... look out for an email from me. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:33, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Buidhe has cleaned it out. Moneytrees🌴^{Talk🌲Help out at CCI!} 20:37, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well,

WP:AGF or other, to these people – they abused our trust, their stuff should be unceremoniously removed unless it is completely clear that it couldn't have been copied. Anyway, I'll leave you to it, please keep up the good work! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:17, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Sometimes I just want to be the nice guy, I get a little worried that I might end up removing actual hard work. But you're right, presumptive removals are usually the best and easiest option. Moneytrees🌴^{Talk🌲Help out at CCI!} 13:39, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:OtakuKart

Hello,

I'd like to continue working on Draft:OtakuKart by adding more citations and proper details, how do I restore it? Thank you! — Preceding

talk • contribs) 13:12, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi,

AfC review, and that you do not again try to move it to mainspace or indeed make any mainspace edit relating to the business. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:26, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi, Justlettersandnumbers I replied on the original talk page, the following: Thank you Justlettersandnumbers, I'm not being paid for the creating this, I'm the owner of the said property, and would like to create and unbiased wikipedia page for my entity. I have read the wikipedia policy for the same, please guide me if possible. Thanks!

Malta Jazz Festival

Actually, most of the acts mentioned in the table at the bottom were referenced earlier on in the main article. Besides, a reference is surely not needed for every single act who has appeared at a festival. See the example of the Montreux Jass Festival below, where no references are provided. I started the page on the Malta Jazz Festival about 11 years ago and have dedicated myself to editing it in close coordination with the festival's Artistic Director. I would very much welcome help and appreciate guidance with codes of practice I am unaware of but I do feel that on this occasion, you have deleted the work done on the page unnecessarily. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_performers_at_the_Montreux_Jazz_Festival Kont Dracula (talk) 20:01, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(

disclose it

(that's a requirement that was not in force ten years ago).

On sourcing: there are indeed huge amounts of unsourced material in the project, but that's really not a reason to add more; and yes, I fully agree,

independent reliable source; there's no requirement for the source to be available online, or for it to be in English, but it must be possible to access it somewhere, such as in a library. For a major event such as the Malta Jazz Festival, I'd expect there to be plenty of coverage in the press – doesn't the Times of Malta cover the event in detail, for example? Adding more references to the article can only improve it. Please post on the talk-page, Talk:Malta Jazz Festival, if you have other questions. Oh, and you linked a mention of the Yellowjackets to our page on the American wasps. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:49, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks for your reply. I will post on Talk:Malta Jazz Festival with regards the festival but you do bring into question my integrity so, just to clarify, I have no financial relationship whatsoever with regards the festival and have never received anything at all for editing the page. Almost all of which is indeed referenced. I am just a fan who knows the Artistic Director of the festival, which I am sure does not bar me from editing the page. There are many links to the Times of Malta website and elsewhere for the most recent events but for some of the earlier festivals, online material is hard to come by. I will try to source people who have the original festival programmes to provide a reference for every single act. In the meantime, I would really appreciate your patience in not deleting large sections of the page. You seem like a reasonable guy (unlike some editors I have encountered) so I hope that we can find a compromise on this. In the meantime, I will rectify the yellowjackets situation immediately. Kont Dracula (talk) 23:11, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft finished

Hello, I have finished the draft, and made improvement to my profile as you asked. Will you be able to take a look into it? draft:otakukart

Thank you! — Preceding

talk • contribs) 10:28, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Nomination of Jean Machine for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jean Machine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean Machine until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:03, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Damn! I was hoping to do that myself,

Chris Troutman! Anyway, good and necessary move, thanks. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:00, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Debresser/wallyfromdilbert

I guess we were working on the same report there (when I went to block Debresser, I saw you'd just blocked him). However, I was wondering about the respective length of blocks – I went for 72 hours and you went for a week. Do you think this is balanced given the fact that wallyfromdilbert was up to five reverts and Debresser only four? I wondered whether you'd gone for a week as Debresser has a long block record? Cheers, Number 57 22:01, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

WP:ANEW, where he's been reported three times this year. I asked him here if he was prepared to do something about his combative behaviour, and the answer was essentially a "no"; that report ended with a caution, which seems to have had exactly zero effect. I believe a slightly longer vacation from editing is appropriate in the circumstances, but this is not an area where I've previously been active, so if you feel there should be equal treatment, please feel free to modify at will. The one thing I'm sure of is what I've already said: this has got to stop. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:18, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

No, that's fair enough. If he's had several blocks and warnings recently, a longer block is probably more appropriate. Cheers! Number 57 22:27, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Aegis Services LLC

Justlettersandnumbers Hello,

I see that you have deleted my article Aegis Services LLC when I have already submitted reasons not delete the page. I spent lots of hours trying to create and you just dleted in a minute because you thought it was what? It was NOT promotional at all as it did not include any promotional content. Can you please revert your decision or advice me what needs to be removed from the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lillie8 (talk • contribs) 10:34, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Lillie8, you did indeed give some reasons for not deleting the page, but they weren't very convincing and you didn't give them until twenty minutes after the page had been deleted. Let me ask you this: all your edits to date have been about Sri Lanka; what made you suddenly post a promotional page about a company in Qatar? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:09, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(talk) Justlettersandnumbers After I published the page I logged out for lunch and when I cam back the article was flagged which is when I submitted my request for non deletion! Do you need to keep your eyes on the wikipedia pages you create all the time? Where in the wikipedia does it say that you need to be from the same locale to create a page in WP? FYI I did a favor for my friend since I have an account in WP and I have NEVER used my account for promotional content. Please consider undoing the deletion since I just don't have the time to work on another article and don't want to lose my friend. Thanks. 17 May 2020

Gnoming

When you made the move of

Oldenburg horse to Oldenburger, the talk page didn't move and thus the history was messed up. The Oldenburger redirect had its own project tag and talkpage. I don't care one way or the other about the title, but you probably need to use your magic admin foo to merge the talkpage history if you want the other title. Montanabw^(talk) 19:24, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

• (talk page stalker) Fixed, good catch. Weirdly never encountered this situation before, but in moving the page, if you select "move the associated talk page" as you normally would, the article gets moved but the talk page move is never performed. Obviously, it's blocked by an existing page, but there's no error message, no notification that the talk page move attempt was unsuccessful, no indication whatsoever that the move didn't go according to plan. Strange software quirk. ~Swarm~ ^{sting} 19:43, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Well, that's a weird one! Anyway, well caught, thank you! Swarm has already fixed it, it seems (ty, Swarm!). Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:45, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Yes, it's a weird one! I guess you have to catch the error yourself and then move the talk page separately, deleting the impeding page and then subsequently restore any deleted revisions to merge the histories. Seems like an obvious thing that shouldn't happen without being flagged as an error or failure in some way, but like I said I've never even seen this so I guess it's just usually never been enough of an issue to get brought to the devs attention. I suspect that even putting in a ticket to have this changed would get ignored as being too low of a priority. ~Swarm~ ^{sting} 19:49, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Obtain contents of deleted page

I'd like to obtain the contents of Indiana University Amateur Radio Club, which was I notified was up for deletion today (and then was subsequently deleted). I understand that I may request retrieval of this material from you, as the deleting administrator, for future reference or improvement. Thank you in advance. —Firespeaker (talk) 20:42, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, no problem with that,

notability requirements for organisations are near to zero. I can either email the page to you (if your email is activated), or restore the page in draft space. Which would you prefer? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:47, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Either is fine. I believe my email should be set up, but let me know if that's a problem. —Firespeaker (talk) 20:21, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Now at Draft:Indiana University Amateur Radio Club, Firespeaker. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:17, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I missed this at the time, Justlettersandnumbers. Could I get access to it again? Sorry about that. —Firespeaker (talk) 15:31, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Dobuy Academy

You may wish to revoke TPA.--Cahk (talk) 07:28, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Cahk! I've just declined the request for now, let's see what happens. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:42, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lou Frizzell

His article seems largely a copy and paste from here[9]. Is it a copyright violation?...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:21, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say that was a near-certainty,

WP:CP in case anyone wants to rewrite it. Would you like to deal with that, or shall I? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:28, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Please handle it yourself. The topic isn't really of interest to me....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:02, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So where is the

covert advertising

I don't get it. Where in this revision contains

WP:NPOV

. Dancing to the tune of paid editors? Don't you get hte point of COI edit request? Does it look like we accept 100% of them?

And oh look, another

replyto|Can I Log In}}'s talk page! 21:38, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi, Can I Log In! Everything after this revision is paid-editor content, created by WWB Too of Beutler Ink (see www.beutlerink.com). If you want to discuss, please use the talk-page of the article – that's what it's there for! Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:51, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cinema for Peace

Hi, Thank you for your comment on my input in the

Cinema for Peace page. I'm a newbie and hope to get help here. The page has been having inaccurate information from what it seems to be trolls against the entity. The current version that you reverted to has mentioned to Gaddafi as it's guest, which is untrue as per the citation itself. Gaddafi came as a plus one to a guest and was not recognized at the Gala. It is clear from the wording that the edits were made to damage the reputation by someone holding grudges, and not factual info. Could you please help in reverting the article to the version before 03.10.2019? Thanks for any help on this. --Oslo95 (talk) 10:38, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi,

independent reliable sources, of course (and disclose your COI as above). Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:31, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi, Justlettersandnumbers! Thanks, but I am not paid by Cinema for Peace for this and I only support them on a voluntary basis. Do I need to disclose COI, and if so, how?

Articles for Creation: List of reviewers by subject notice

Hi Justlettersandnumbers, you are receiving this notice because you are listed as an active Articles for Creation reviewer.

Recently a list of reviewers by area of expertise was created. This notice is being sent out to alert you to the existence of that list, and to encourage you to add your name to it. If you or other reviewers come across articles in the queue where an acceptance/decline hinges on specialist knowledge, this list should serve to facilitate contact with a fellow reviewer.

To end on a positive note, the backlog has dropped below 1,500, so thanks for all of the hard work some of you have been putting into the AfC process!

Sent to all Articles for Creation reviewers as a one-time notice. To opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Regards, Sam-2727 (talk)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please do me a favor?

Could you possibly chime in on this talk page conversation[10] concerning links to Youtube videos and whether they violate

WP:ELNEVER? Thanks in advance....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:38, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

CCI update

CCI !

It was strong, but presumptive removals killed it in the end. Thanks for helping with it's destruction. --Moneytrees🌴^{Talk🌲Help out at CCI!} 03:25, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Hello,

My name is Nicola Green. I’ve noticed that you’ve been working incredibly hard to monitor the wikipedia page about me - thank you.

I also saw that you advised me to change my username - I do not represent an organisation or group, I am an individual (artist) - thank you for drawing this to my attention.

Please know, I am new to the world of wikipedia so any mistakes are completely unintentional - but I intend to follow wikipedia’s guidelines so hope not to make any. I will not directly edit the page about me. You’ll see I have declared the COI on my user page.

I have been advised to make suggestions on the talk page in order to improve the overall quality of this article and help if I can to ensure there are no factual errors. Your continued help on this page is really appreciated.

Thank you, NicolaGreen72 (talk) 09:20, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, NicolaGreen72! What you suggest sounds exactly right, thank you! I've left a brief welcome note on your talk-page, with some links to pages you might find helpful. I'm happy to try to answer any question you may have – which you can ask either here or on your own talk-page (I should see if you do so). Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:32, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what to think about this

Hey, JLAN - https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Phil_King_(Texas_politician)&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1 - 39.3% unlikely copyvio - but all was deleted and listed as copyvio. ^Atsme _Talk 📧 15:29, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

contributor copyright investigation of Billy Hathorn, one of the most prolific violators of our copyright policy in the history of the project. I seem to recall that without counting his many sockpuppets, there were at one point about 9800 articles needing to be checked, or somewhere around an eighth of the whole massive CCI backlog. A (very) few noble and dedicated people are working away at reducing that backlog; I did some myself, but found it pretty mind-numbing and have taken a longish break from it. The difference between CCI cleanup and everyday copyvio cleanup is that we don't need to spend time establishing whether or not there actually was a copyright violation in each specific case, and if so where from; we've established that the editor habitually and regularly copied stuff, and all his contributions can be presumptively removed or deleted. My suggestion would be that you undo your reversion there, and then add any content you wish, but strictly in your words, not his. Oh, and I haven't forgotten your recent ping! Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:45, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

I can understand the concern, but please look at the history of that BLP - between Fluffernutter in 2015, and me in 2017 any sign of Hathorn copyvios were taken care of a long time ago. What just happened is not good, JLAN. The editor removed over 7500 bytes of info that I reverted back. Earwig showed a 0% likelihood after reverting, and then Moneytrees removed 764 bytes of material. Is Earwig causing these discrepancies? I was concerned over Moneytrees not being quite seasoned enough to be working heavily in copyvio, and I hope this is just a fluke. When big blocks of material are being removed from articles, I have cause for concern. I don't know if you'll get the same cache I got for this action which shows 0%. Let me know, because I'm inclined to do further investigation as to what is being removed as copyvio vs potential Earwig issues as a result of what just happened at Phil King (Texas poliltician) which was nowhere near being a copyvio to have that much of the text removed. They are removing material that should not be removed, like a person's accomplishments and government stats. ^Atsme _Talk 📧 17:47, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CP. Hope this helps, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:15, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks, JLAN, but

WP:CP is out of my scope - I wouldn't know where to begin blanking pages or lists. I've already explained the issue to Moneytrees, and have restored the factual information. I checked Earwig using the last version edited in 2007 by Hathorn - Phil King (Texas politician) @145372677 - and Earwig shows 61% likelihood of copyvio to a Facebook page that wasn't created until 2011 and it is Phil King's FB page. They're all titles and names which are not copyvios, such as the Texas House of Representatives, represents District 61, chairman of the Regulated Industries Committee, promote competition in the electricity and telecommunications markets, Electric Utility Restructuring Legislative Oversight Committee, a joint committee of the Texas House and Senate, "Freshman Legislator of the Year", "Rookie Legislator of the Year". Most of the 2007 fluff that caused the false copyvio flag has long since been removed. This is the version when I finished editing that page. Earwig shows Violation Unlikely 36.7% confidence. The only concern goes to a blog dated 2012, so it was a mirror. I check for copyvios when I'm editing, and reviewing at NPP and AfC. There were no copyvios and I am still concerned that what happened with that one article may be happening to many others, and it needs to be looked into to be on the safe side - just not by me. I asked Moneytrees to revert his removal of content and he's obviously quite busy doing other things to be bothered with it, so I fixed the issues myself. Surely he knows that government information published by the government is PD, and that Earwig often produces false copyvio flags because of titles, names, etc. Anyway, my focus now is on getting a RS chart for WikiProject Dogs, so take care and don't work too hard. ^Atsme _Talk 📧 20:58, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Biased Brumby page.

I have taken it to talk, on feral, you need to stop calling people names and start being constructive. The page is bias I have supplied evidence to this effect with the name feral,should be changed to Brumby it is a Brumby page not, you must not revert the page and repeated vandetlisum to the eddits and if this persists you could or may be blocked. Shenqijing (talk) 08:00, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TomatJCT600 unblocked

Hi Justlettersandnumbers! Just reaching out to let you know that I have unblocked TomatJCT600 (who you blocked on the 8th) as

WP:COI. No action is required on your part, this is just a friendly heads up. Best, TheSandDoctor ^Talk 04:10, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks, TheSandDoctor! I did actually see that he'd been renamed, but saw no unblock request on his talk, so took no action. I hope you are keeping well, best regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:36, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am indeed, I hope you are too! --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 17:55, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

West African dwarf goats

You reverted our edits. There is only 1 breed of dwarfs in West Africa and that's the Djallonké. But it's has multiple nicknames an aliases. The proginators are coming from the jallon mountains. There are multiple different names given depending tribe owning them or country. But all considered 1 breed. So please revert the revert on my changes.

Jean Kiala President - African Ornamental Breeders Association (AOBA) Board member - Djallonké goat, Djallonké sheep and Djallonké cattle specialist group. www.ornamental-breeders.org [email protected]

~~KAMK1KAMK1 13:08, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Talk:West African Dwarf goats. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:34, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Editor going crazy

This editor KAMK1 has now been adding unnecessary messages to my talk page as can be seen here and here. I think their actions are now more disruptive on the project. —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 09:59, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Nnadigoodluck! Yes, it's getting quite disruptive, but he's definitely still trying to improve the encyclopaedia even if he's going about it all wrong. Do you think that a quiet word from you might perhaps get him to calm down a little? I'll try too, but don't have much hope of success. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:14, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you're right about him improving the encyclopedia. I'll try to engage them further and see what happens. —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 10:19, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Richard M. Perloff

Hello, justlettersandnumbers. Newbie here who had made minor updates to indicate new published material to the above-referenced article. These were subsequently edited out, along with entire unedited sections of the article, which were also removed. Thank you for the helpful comments and I am trying to adhere to Wikipedia guidelines and policies. The page has now reverted to a much earlier version that is no longer accurate, eliminating adds and links that were compiled over the past 10 years. Can the page be reverted back to the content it had on June 14, which had more accurate content? Kuninrosmash (talk) 14:04, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please use the talk-page of the article (

neutrality. If you have some personal or professional connection to Perloff you must disclose it. Thank you, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:24, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Draft:InGenius Prep

User talk:Kayla kas's page after I questioned kayla about paid editing. Wikipedia says "If you have a good faith basis to suspect a user of paid editing, add to the user's talk page the template" which is what I did. I believe it was good faith to ask her if she was being paid? Theroadislong (talk) 14:26, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Well,

Sounds Fake But Okay. I see that this is already being discussed at User talk:Materialscientist, and there's probably little to be gained by continuing a separate thread here; but to answer your question: if you reasonably suspect or believe that someone is an undisclosed paid editor, it is perfectly acceptable to ask them if they are, and to invite them to make appropriate disclosure. And the template is a community-approved way of doing so. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

No response from Materialscientist, I have removed

Sounds Fake But Okay from my watchlist, the editor was getting rather abusive. Theroadislong (talk) 18:15, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Placement of

Template:CatAutoTOC

on category pages

In

CatAutoTOC}} in the guideline Wikipedia:Categorization a sign of consensus? —⁠andrybak (talk) 11:41, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Andrybak, Debresser, the user was adding large numbers of these after being repeatedly asked to stop (and is now blocked as a result) – see User talk:50.26.172.216. Any good-faith editor can of course make whatever subsequent changes he/she thinks appropriate. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:23, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why that user was blocked, but I do know that I don't understand why you removed it from the two category pages where I noticed you removing it. The fact that an editor was blocked does not mean that all his edits should be reverted. Debresser (talk) 20:34, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why

Why did you revert a perfectly helpful and innocent edit like adding {{

CatAutoTOC}}, like you did here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Debresser (talk • contribs

) 18:18, June 20, 2020 (UTC)

Template for Progress Singapore Party

Hello, I note that you had previously deleted the template Template:SG/PSP/logo. The reason for deletion was cited as a use of a non free file for use in templates. I have created a variation of the logo here and wish to restore the template, following the format set for all other political parties of Singapore: Template:SG/PAP Template:SG/WP Template:SG/SPPPpp Template:SG/SDP Template:SG/SDA Template:SG/NSP Template:SG/RP in view of the upcoming election.

Seeking your concurrence as required by the page. Thank you. Seloloving (talk) 18:51, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Seloloving: Your variant logo does not address my reason for !voting delete there: that the wikitext of the template is so simple that there's no reason to use a template for it. Besides, you should not be unilaterally overturning discussions, even if you disagree with their reasoning, and even if the admin(s) who enforced them don't reply to you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:59, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Pppery, I waited nearly three days for a reply during which the admin here replied to someone else below me, while the 2020 Singaporean general election page was in full swing with the other 7-8 main political parties utilizing the template format. I never claimed to disagree with any reasoning for the original deletion, but instead tried to mitigate the use of an official logo by creating a variant. But seeing that unfortunately that's how every single Singapore GE page is formatted, someone will need to change the code on every page, or standardise to allow the one Progress Singapore Party to follow the other 10 political parties in Singapore, as I linked above. If the PSP template is deemed too simple and unnecessary, then the other 10 should be recommended for deletion also, breaking a lot of pages and necessitating a lot of work. I myself have been trying to find a way to merge the 11 templates into one, but am thus far unsuccessful. While I apologize for recreating the template, this was the only solution unless someone is willing to assist in cleaning up all the past GE pages. Seloloving (talk) 01:33, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm ... I thought I'd nominated that image for deletion on Commons as a

derivative work, but apparently not, must have failed to save the page or something; anyway, I've now done so. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:47, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Make It Right Project

I would appreciate a link to the discussion of copyright problems in Make It Right Project, which you deleted. I'd also appreciate a copy of it. Thank you. I plan to recreate the article. deisenbe (talk) 12:35, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

WP:CP listing is here, the discussion is on your talk-page here. I don't see that you ever answered the important question there: did you also add copied non-free content to other articles? That should take priority over any other projects you may have. We don't restore copyvios, but if you like I can restore or email the bare bones of the page (i.e., without any running text). Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:41, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Dang dab debate

Looks like someone, now blocked, must moved a bunch of animal breed articles from natural disambiguation to parenthetical disambiguation without discussion or consensus. I'm only going to move a couple back, just in case there was some discussion, somewhere that may need to be readdressed, but heads up I pinged you at Talk:Campine_chicken#Here_we_go_again. Maybe some of these were moved long ago, but the chicken one was recent. Montanabw^(talk) 20:03, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

Hi Justlettersandnumbers. Thank you for responding on my talk page. Apparently I need more help than I thought with changing my username. I requested to change it to c.clayregistrar, but it was denied. I will re-read the username guidelines again and request another name.

talk) 15:35, 26 June 2020 (UTC) AMSETregistrar[reply

]

'Draft:Hadith of Ghazwae Hind' recreated

FYI, Draft:Hadith of Ghazwae Hind which was deleted by you recently has been almost immediately recreated..--Fz^tc_s 11:12, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know, Faizhaider. Nick dealt with that while I was out walking with my dogs. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:48, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

!--Fz^tc_s 11:57, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

King Jomo

Please i am requesting for the undeletion of a page with the name King Jomo, i want to edit it and make changes Happinesskalu (talk) 02:12, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I've done that, Happinesskalu – see Draft:King Jomo. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:29, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Surprise...Surprise...- Copyright violations at List of Murder, She Wrote episodes

Again. An IP copied and pasted episodes summaries. You may want to do your stuff for all edits after this one[11]. Thanks again....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 20:48, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• It's happened again[12]. Copying and pasting from Imdb as seen with the episode It's a Dog's Life....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 01:27, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edits by Donaldduck13/Cowandchicken14

Hi Justlettersandnumbers – today you deleted the categories created by this blocked editor, thank you for doing so. However, all the redirected articles that they restored remain. Is there any way of rolling these back quickly, or will I or another editor have to go through them one by one to revert them? Thanks. Richard3120 (talk) 19:10, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Armenian Colombians, there may still be some others. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:24, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

I know, my fault... I started on a couple of the articles, then realised it would take me all day to do the lot, so that's when I started asking around for a quicker solution. There are still plenty of others which I haven't touched – I know some editors then tagged them afterwards for lack of sources or similar, so that's screwed up the rollback process. Thanks anyway. Richard3120 (talk) 20:27, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

Precious

Six years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:22, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Gerda! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:37, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated creation of Rahul Ravi

Hi, Justlettersandnumbers the article Rahul Ravi is again recreated without convincing improvements. Please have a look. Thank you ~ Amkgp 💬 16:21, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Amkgp, G4 has been declined there – correctly, in my opinion, as the new version is a little different from the old. Two things you could do: remove any unsourced material; and start a new AfD. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:37, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Db-g12 tag deletion from draft

Hey, just coming on here to say sorry for removing the {{db-g12}} tag on the Anthony Thomas draft. I just looked at the comparisons between the Facebook page and the draft and thought that was it. I didn't think of the person's page. 2601:4A:C300:412:4589:D1CA:666F:EFD3 (talk) 05:14, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, IPv6 – to be honest, I hadn't even noticed that you'd done so at Draft:Chef Anthony Thomas. But in general it's probably best not to remove G12 tags unless they've clearly been placed in bad faith – the admin who looks at it may see problems that the original tagger had not seen. Nice of you to leave a note here! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:37, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:AnjanaMultimedia/sandbox

Wow! That was fast. You deleted it 3 seconds after I tagged it! --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:24, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was just about to come to your talk and say something about that – I looked at it moments before you tagged it, and judged it good delete-and-block candidate. So I was well surprised to see your notification on his talk-page. Great minds? Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:33, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Criticisms on Cinema for Peace

Hi, you reverted my edit where I moved the criticisms to the "Criticisms" section. It does not make sense to have criticisms in a section called activities. Could you please revert that or move the criticisms to the section called "criticisms"? --Oslo95 (talk) 09:45, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please restore

Hello,isn't the new version of this page created by me yesterday wasn't an entirely different version of this page deleted two years ago per a discussion?. Is it possible to restore it now?. Thanks... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Annajacob8 (talk • contribs) 17:48, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not really,

subst:submit}} (complete with the curly parentheses) to it. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:08, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

I didn't get paid to create this page and I have no relation with this company. I heard about this company through a friend of mine who sold his car. I don't know how to fix the issue since I'm almost new to editing Wikipedia. Please help me to fix the issue if it is possible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Annajacob8 (talk • contribs) 19:20, 19 July 2020 (UTC) I'be created the page again with a different title (CarSwitch.com). please have a look. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Annajacob8 (talk • contribs) 20:19, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Advice for article you highlighted

Hi there, you just highlighted for speedy deletion an article I've been working on draft:Sano Genetics and I would really appreciate your help in improving it. I believe the subject is notable, it has been featured in various reliable sources, and I have worked to try to make sure the tone is as non-promotional as possible. While clearly you have read it to be promotional, I would really appreciate any help to make sure that is not the case - I want to make this article because of its notability not because I want to frame the discussion but there is no way of submitting a topic to be written up by a neutral party.

I would really appreciate any help you can give me on this.

Clarealev (talk) 15:57, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:AfyaPay,LLC

You may wish to revoke TPA.--Cahk (talk) 07:21, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Cahk! I'm watching that page ...

Cross check

Stuff on this part of the world is sort of your balliwick. Probably worth checking notability of this new stub and updating lists if relevant: Namaqua Pony. Montanabw^(talk) 21:09, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That seems to be fine as far as it goes; I'm not sure there's going to be a lot more to say about it, though. I might add a couple more sources, but those that are there are enough for two short sentences of text. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:51, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mentoring on Wikipedia

Hi, I really appreciated your support getting the Regus page to a draft.

As a newbie to Wikipedia, I'm probably doing lots of things wrong, but I have tried to follow the rules to produce an article and it wasn't a success.

Although I am working for a company, I am passionate about getting fair and impartial information out into the public domain, and would love to give this endeavour another attempt. Would you be happy to / or recommend an independent editor to look a bit deeper at the article? --KatherineBusby2019 (talk) 03:34, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

does not tolerate promotion of any kind, and that includes your kind. Any content you write here risks being considered to be Wikipedia:deceptive advertising

(and thus illegal in the United States) unless accompanied by a clear statement that it is content supplied by the company (which of course we can't do).

If you really want to add to the encyclopaedia, choose a topic area (

independent reliable sources. Otherwise, my (unsolicited) advice is to stop. Sorry, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:34, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Justlettersandnumbers FYI, I have clearly disclosed my affiliation to the company, which is following Wikipedia's rules.--KatherineBusby2019 (talk) 12:09, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you check this out?

There’s a copyvio complaint via OTRS (after an anon IP blanked the article and was warned twice) for Jane Hogarth. The OTRS worker has reviewed the source claimed to be the copied version, but doesn’t see a problem. (It’s paywalled, but he can email it if needed). I haven’t reviewed the source, but the article contains multiple sources and was created by an experienced editor with a lot of new articles under their belt. Earwig was clean, but possibly because it cannot pass the paywall. Anyhow, you’re good at the copyvio stuff, and so I’m pinging you to see if you —as a neutral party— want to look into this. I’m also shooting you an email. Montanabw^(talk) 15:47, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Autoblock

Hello, I tried editing and I got a notification that I was autoblocked because my IP address was used by Gmlyrics.

I feel this is a misunderstanding because I did not share my device or network with anyone and I am being punished wrongly.

I have been editing for 2 years now and I am surprised this is happening again.

Please kindly unblock me so I can continuing adding content to Wikipedia.

Thank you. Livingstone Imonitie (talk) 10:31, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Livingstone Imonitie, I'm sorry about that – I'm afraid it's something that can happen. Please try again now, I may have fixed it (but this is a new experience for me, so I may not have succeeded). Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:55, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Almeida Theatre

I have never been paid by the Almeida Theatre for the edits I made on the Wikipedia page.

I was paid for writing Wikipedia pages twice, and registered those on my page as requested.

I have not been paid for any other of my Wikipedia edits, some of which I made under a previous Username.

I worked for the Almeida from 1985 to 1989, and thought that my firsthand knowledge of those busy years (well before the Internet came into common use) would be a service the field. I began editing and adding to relevant sections of the page in 2011 under a different username and have continued until earlier this year, putting in countless hours. To repeat - I was not paid a penny for this work, nor for my edits on other pages about which I had firsthand knowledge and volunteered what I knew and the time it took to verify that independently.

I echo the sentiments of the User above in saying I feel increasingly punished by interventions such as yours. Before this summer my experience of Wikipedia was as a place of shared knowledge and understanding. I don't know what it is now - it's certainly a lot more unpleasant. - Kbaker121 (talk) 20:25, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging of

Draft:Tawny Chatmon

I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on

bitey to me. If you wish, you may try using the simple proposed deletion (PROD) process, or the full articles for deletion (AfD) process, instead. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 22:55, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Well, yes, DESiegel, in an ideal world I would have remembered the identical previous version deleted for the same reasons before I draftified it, but I didn't. Anyway, if you want to remove a copyvio tag from any page, would you please make sure that you remove the copyvio first? Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 08:48, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is now at a 38% ("violation unlikely") rating fro9m Earwig's tool and that from isolated phrases and names of events, which latter are factual statements not protected by copyright. I don't think this was at a G12 level even before I edited it, but I did, before removing the copyvio tag, edit to remove the larger sections of matching text. Do yto9u think this is still a G12-level issue? I can certainly make errors, and perhaps I did here, but I don't currently think I did. I can understand not noticing the matches until after the draftification. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 14:44, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No,

close following in a moment (e.g., this). As for mistakes, we all make them – I certainly made one here (I stupidly looked at the editor's deleted contributions, where it didn't show up because it was created while he/she was logged out, rather than checking the deleted history of the page). I don't agree with your course of action here, but the point of tagging a page rather than immediately deleting it is to get a second opinion, and of course I respect that opinion even if it differs from my own. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:26, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Fair enough, there is room for differences of opinion. I thank you for your response. Perhaps I should have done additio9nal editing before removing the tag. I will remember that. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 16:48, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft with 1 unquoted sentence is deleted under usage of copyrighted work (Draft:John Dawson-Damer)

Hey, @

talk • contribs) 04:56, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

No,

Robot Kerl, the copying was more extensive than that. Much of it was from here, including the sentence "John Dawson-Damer owned one of the world’s best private collection of Lotus racing cars" (note the missing "s" of "collections", as in the source). The sentence "After the crash it was discovered Mr Dawson-Damer's helmet had also not been MSA approved but this was not a contributing factor in the accident or the outcome" is verbatim from here

.

If you like, I can email you the content of the page, but it can't be added back to Wikipedia without substantial changes – everything you write here must (with a very few exceptions) be entirely in your own words. Or, if you prefer, I can restore the page without the running text. Let me know? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:38, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seems fair enough,

talk • contribs) 04:56, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Robot Kerl, I can't do that – we don't restore copyright violations. I've partially restored the page at Draft:John Dawson-Damer. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:56, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Nomination of Ahmass Fakahany for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ahmass Fakahany is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmass Fakahany until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 23:06, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notifying you as the first editor to draftify the article. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 23:06, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Nathan2055 – actually it seems still to be on my watchlist, so I'd seen this. I might look at it again, but not until I've had some sleep! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:11, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All right, just wanted to drop a notice on all of the relevant editors' talk pages because of this particular page's weird and long history. It's been moved in and out of draftspace at least four times, and that's just the start of the mess. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 23:15, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Experience of Template:R and Template:Use list-defined references ?

Hi @

WP:LDRHOW and Template:R, which seem quite nice. I found that you switched to both styles at the same time, during this edit of Pasiega. I wonder how your experience is with these? Specifically if it has created tensions with other editors, which is the main concern I heard when I asked about it in the Teahouse. Cheers! DougInAMug (Talk) 18:44, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi,

actively discouraged, and could indeed create tensions. I try always to leave a note on the article talk-page before implementing such a change, as I did at Ousmane Sow but apparently did not at Pasiega; that's particularly important in a page with heavy traffic. However, since list-defined refs are fully compatible with standard inline citations, I see no problem with adding refs in that format to a page with "ordinary" references, and have never run into opposition when doing so. Ask away if you have questions, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:56, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

G12 decline?

Hi. I'm wondering why you declined my tagging of Draft:Aquatorium (alkaline hydrolysis) for speedy deletion as a copyvio. You're correct that the copyvio has been removed, of course, but... what's left? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 03:41, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, Mdaniels5757, there's nothing much there. I removed your G12 tag because it was no longer applicable, and the page wasn't eligible for deletion under any other criterion that I could think of. It's in draft space, so I don't believe it's doing much harm; either the author will return to it, or to it will gracefully fade away in about six months' time. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:58, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Need help for Artcile Pooja Bishnoi

please help me what i do for Pooja Bishnoi Profile , she is 8 year old , she a fast runner from Rajasthan Village, I submited Many time profile request but not approved ...

what is happing in wikipedia plateform . this is pooja bishnoi hindi version article : https://hi.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%A4%AA%E0%A5%82%E0%A4%9C%E0%A4%BE_%E0%A4%AC%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%B6%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%A8%E0%A5%8B%E0%A4%88 I want to Pooja bishnoi article for english vesion . please help Naresh Prajapat 10:09, 14 August 2020 (UTC) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pooja_Bishnoi Naresh Prajapat 10:10, 14 August 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nareshprajapatmogra (talk • contribs)

appropriate disclosure on your user-page. You can ask questions at the Teahouse – I'll leave you an invitation. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:22, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Untitled

Hi,

I am writing in response to this action:

00:21, 5 February 2020 Justlettersandnumbers talk contribs deleted page User:PamelaAshley/sandbox (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of https://hermanwallace.com/faculty/lila-abbate) (thank) This page is being created by & for Lila Abbate; the bio written on the hermanwallace website noted above was written by Lila Abbate. It is her professional bio that she'd like to use on her wikipedia page as well. Is there a way we can do so?

Thank you, PamelaAshley (talk) 22:00, 7 August 2020 (UTC)PamelaAshleyPamelaAshley (talk) 22:00, 7 August 2020 (UTC) Thanks,[reply]

Hi,

encyclopaedic tone without copying from any external source. Good luck! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:52, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Untitled

Hello, Please explain your assumption that I'm a paid contributor, and help me understand why you are deleting all of my updates to my artist friends' wiki pages. Phillipbarcio (talk) 22:15, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

this. You are welcome to propose improvements on the talk-pages of those articles. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:05, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Untitled

Hello,

I am new here trying to recreate an article you deleted some days ago, Creating Draft:Eleanna Finokalioti (Fin). The part you say that violates copyright rules is written by Eleanna Fin herself. Eleanna FInIt is her professional bio that she has given permission to the culture news site to use it and that she'd like to use on her wikipedia page as well. So I have full permission to do so as I am her website and social media manager. I will change it again a bit, cause it is a professional bio and cannot be changed at all normally, but please do not delete it again. Thank you in advance and I appreciate it. Blueangelm12 (talk) 10:22, 23 August 2020 (UTC)Blueangelm12[reply]

Hi,

paid-editor disclosure – I'll leave you a note on how to do so. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:18, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Luis Cadena, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pichincha.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:39, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sensor Open Systems Architecture Entry

Please undelete Draft:Sensor Open Systems Architecture so that I can make corrections. This page was not ready for publication and was supposed to be a draft. Thank you. --JerryGipper (talk) 15:31, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry,

disclose it. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:14, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Bare bones would be fine. I can't use the article title to start a new page per rules. JerryGipper (talk) 20:29, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK,

appropriate disclosure before making any other edit. Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:44, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

DYK nomination of Alonso Martínez de Espinar

Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --evrik ^(talk) 03:57, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Justlettersandnumbers, we really need to hear from you on the newly proposed hook right away. You have been editing elsewhere on Wikipedia recently; please stop by here so we can get this nomination the attention it deserves on the main page. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:25, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Luis Cadena

Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Armadillopteryx 06:18, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Info Luis Cadena - Ecuadorian painter source

Hi Thanks for your effort on bringing the page I started up to Wikipedia standards. I’d love to see more very intriguing and relevant information added. I had added some but it was removed. There’s a bio book in Spanish available, which I’ve love to get a hold of, unfortunately I’ve checked on all the library catalogues near me (Gov, and from universities) but they don’t have it. Is there a chance you could have access to it? It should contain more proof of facts such as:

- His signature *clear on the second picture of this link https://www.invaluable.com/auction-lot/luis-cadena-equadorian-1830-1889-oil-on-canvas-po-87-c-7b3fe7d5c7 - The George Washington portrait gift to USA to Ecuador - Highlights on his paintings; president Gabriel Garcia Marquez, Los mártires del 2 Agosto de 1810 . Etc - Spouse, family. His parents > http://www.enciclopediadelecuador.com/personajes-historicos/luis-cadena/

https://www.worldcat.org/title/modesta-y-brevisima-biografia-del-excelso-pintor-del-siglo-xix-don-luis-cadena-jaramillo/oclc/51954988

Regards, ContributorECU (talk) 16:20, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DYK credit for starting the page. If you have suggestions on how it could be improved, do please post them at Talk:Luis Cadena – that's the right place to discuss them. Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:26, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Teahouse ping list

Hello Justlettersandnumbers! I am currently compiling a list/directory of experienced editors to be used by Teahouse regulars to solicit help with some of the questions that are likely to get archived unanswered. I am drafting it at

WP:TEA#Wikipedia Tagging guides for a newbie. which is feeling rather neglected. It seems to be about image or file uploading, to Wikipedia or to Commons, so please take a look if you find the time. PPS Would you be able to suggest a few other users I could reach out to, users who are both active here and at Commons, or who are active here but know a lot about Commons and/or Image uploading/licensing? Thanks, and best regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 21:12, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

That seems to be a very good idea, Usedtobecool, nice work! May I suggest that you list me under general copyright and OTRS? I do sometimes try to deal with image copyrights, but would not want to be listed as a sort of 'expert' in that area – I'm not one, I have considerably less experience than with text copyrights. Now that User:Ronhjones is no longer with us, the user I most often notice dealing with image problems is Fastily, it might be worth asking there. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:08, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Justlettersandnumbers! Will do. Best, Usedtobecool ☎️ 10:24, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delaware Blue Hen

https://www.songbirdgarden.com/store/info/infoview.asp?documentid=21 Troy34 (talk) 00:08, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

reliable source by Wikipedia standards. The best place to discuss possible improvements to that article is Talk:Delaware Blue Hen. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:42, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Request on 05:34:25, 3 September 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Seedjean

• Seedjean (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Hisham Al Gurg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Seedjean (talk) 05:34, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Justlettersandnumbers: Can you please help me how will I be able to resolve this? What exactly do we need to change so this gets approved? If this is all that we have now, then does that mean that we can not be ever approved on Wikipedia, like ever?

DYK for Alonso Martínez de Espinar

On 5 September 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Alonso Martínez de Espinar, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Juan Mateos and Alonso Martínez de Espinar, both writers on hunting in Spanish Baroque literature, are depicted in Prince Baltasar Carlos in the Riding School (pictured) by Diego Velázquez, whose half-length portrait of Mateos was similarly identified from an engraving by Pedro Perete, son of Pieter Perret? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Alonso Martínez de Espinar. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Alonso Martínez de Espinar), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Prince Baltasar Carlos in the Riding School

On 5 September 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Prince Baltasar Carlos in the Riding School, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Juan Mateos and Alonso Martínez de Espinar, both writers on hunting in Spanish Baroque literature, are depicted in Prince Baltasar Carlos in the Riding School (pictured) by Diego Velázquez, whose half-length portrait of Mateos was similarly identified from an engraving by Pedro Perete, son of Pieter Perret? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Prince Baltasar Carlos in the Riding School), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FYI [13] --evrik ^(talk) 18:39, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Narutolovehinata5

Hello, Justlettersandnumbers. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Luis Cadena.
Message added 09:09, 7 September 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

csdnew 09:09, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

My draft was deleted

@Justlettersandnumbers: Hi, you deleted my draft Imphal Valley draft citing it contained copyrighted information. But I mostly used my own words to write it. Some basic information like names of rivers & the way it was written were copied, but I modified those as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tizen03 (talk • contribs) 10:59, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, Tizen03, the text was copy-pasted from here, here and here. You'd changed a few words, but that did not solve the underlying problem. Everything you write in Wikipedia must be entirely in your own words. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:41, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Justlettersandnumbers: I recreated the Imphal Valley draft from scratch & removed & modified most of the information, can you please review it again ? Tizen03 (talk) 12:57, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Angus cattle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angus_cattle#cite_note-:3-14

Hi! I am hoping to help improve the Angus cattle page, as I see it has been listed as a level-5 vital article in Biology, Animals, but needs some work to "meet the good article criteria." I am somewhat new to Wikipedia, so hope that I did not overstep by making some edits that you reverted to their original version, earlier. There are some statements on the page such as "Because of their native environment, the cattle are very hardy and can survive the Scottish winters, which are typically harsh, with snowfall and storms" (Under characteristics) which are misleading. It is not "because of the environment" that the Angus are hardy, but because of adaptation through natural selection to that environment that they have acquired traits which qualify them as 'hardy.' Other problematic sections include "Calves are usually born smaller than is acceptable for the market, so crossbreeding with dairy cattle is needed for veal production." While this may be true in commercial veal operations, this does not accurately represent the fact that Angus calves are most often a) not used for veal production, and b) are sought after because of their small size to alleviate dystocia issues in young heifers and even mature cows.

This is all to ask if it is possible to work together to help improve this page, and if you might help show me the ropes, such that I don't impede on anyone's work, but hopefully can work towards making a more informative and user-friendly page.

Many thanks!

Mmontanamcintosh (talk) 02:31, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Mmontanamcintosh! Yes, the article has plenty of room for improvement, and help with that is always welcome: yes, I'm prepared to do what I can to assist. Please note that the Angus is a Scottish breed, so our article uses UK English (colour, favour, etc). If you want to discuss specific changes to the page, please do so at Talk:Angus cattle. The stuff about veal calves does not seem accurately to reflect what the source actually says. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:36, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Aquaticity

Justlettersandnumbers https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Justlettersandnumbers&action=edit&section=132 Hello, please check https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft_talk:Aquaticity I made the editing of Aquaticity Ydrofilos (talk) 10:52, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CC BY-SA 3.0 vs 4.0

Thanks for the info! Any idea if we're expecting this situation (can't bring CC BY-SA 4.0 text into Wikipedia because it's incompatible with our CC BY-SA 3.0 license) to be temporary or permanent? I saw the brief VP discussion about moving to the updated license, but it's not clear to me who has the authority to make that call. It would be unfortunate if we're forever prevented from incorporating text released under CC BY-SA 4.0 (and future license versions), though honestly I very rarely come across text that was properly imported into Wikipedia. Thanks! Ajpolino (talk) 20:33, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Ajpolino! I'd like to be able to point you to some (older) discussion of why we're stuck at 3.0 and likely to stay there, but I just can't think at the moment where that discussion might be. As I understand it, the possibility of an "upgrade" has been reviewed and rejected by Legal; I believe (but please don't quote me!) that the sticking point has to do with backwards compatibility. The person who could answer this promptly and properly is Moonriddengirl, but sadly she doesn't often look in here these days. Talk-page watchers, can you help? Whatever the reasons, the reality is that we can't accept text licenced as CC BY-SA 4.0; the hardest thing to remember (for me, at least) is that CC BY 4.0 is compatible/acceptable. I wish you every success in your RfA, it seems to got off to a good start. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:26, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bosco Sodi Wikipedia page

Justlettersandnumbers, I am unclear about your feedback about your most recent revert on the page for Bosco Sodi: "Revert to less promotional version – WP:neutrality is one of the five pillars of this project "

Why was this reverted to a previous version of this page, and what about my edits were what Wikipedia standards considered "promotional"? I have made multiple attempts at fleshing out this page because Sodi is a notable active, living artist, but having all of my edits reverted with vague and subjective feedback is frustrating. I do not have a relationship with Sodi or his management. Thank you for your time. Honkinonbobo (talk) 16:55, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical Storm Tasha

Hello, could you please restore the contents of the page into my userspace? Thanks. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 13:33, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, 1234qwer1234qwer4. The text (after your edit) was:

'''Tropical Storm Tasha''' may refer to: * [[Cyclone Tasha]] * [[Tropical Storm Tasha (1990)]] * [[Typhoon Tasha (1993)]] {{Disambiguation}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Tasha}} [[Category:Pacific typhoon disambiguation pages]]

Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:15, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I recreated the page and left a note on its talk page. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:22, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:GrocersBagSolutions

Hi Justletters and numbers - thank you for blocking the above and deleted their user page - you may want to revoke talk page access as they are adding the same ino there now JW 1961 Talk 09:52, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Joseywales1961, that's already done. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:54, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Justlettersandnumbers, Thanks JW 1961 Talk 09:56, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Megan☺️ ^{Talk to the monster} 10:33, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply

]