User talk:Leszek Jańczuk/Archive 3

DYK for Peter P. Dubrovsky

On

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page

.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:00, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Minuscule 536

On

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page

.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:00, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar, and a suggestion

		The Original Barnstar
		For your excellent articles on Papyri, Minuscules, etc. Just great work! bender235 (talk) 12:58, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you're adding Ancient Greek words (or other languages) to articles, please include them with {{Lang}}, like I demonstrated here. This has several advantages, especially for automatic screen readers. --bender235 (talk) 12:58, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Transcription of Early Greek NT Manuscripts

Being informed by yours truly that you used Philip W. Comfort and David P. Barrett's The Text of the Earliest New Testament Greek Manuscripts to do a transcription of ${\mathfrak {P}}$ ⁵, are you planing on doing transcriptions for the rest of Early Papyri? If so, I'd be more than willing to give a hand if this is your intention :) (Stephen Walch (talk) 19:55, 12 January 2010 (UTC))[reply]

I can quite easily do some of the smaller ones that haven't been done quite quickly. But you're right - quite a daunting task being able to put the transcriptions into Wikipedia form (Stephen Walch (talk) 21:52, 12 January 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Qubbat ul-Khazna

Kubbet el Chazne (Arabic: قبة الخزنة Qubbat ul-Khazna) is an old structure [1]. It is translated into English as the "Dome of the Treasury" and is located inside the courtyard of the Umayyad Mosque. You may take a look at this structure here: [2]. DrMoslehi (talk) 20:48, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Minuscule 541

On

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page

.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:00, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Minuscule 545

Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Cryptic C62 · Talk 06:15, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

DYK for Minuscule 543 (Gregory-Aland)

On

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page

.

Wikiproject: Did you know?

06:00, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

question about your dyk hook

Hi, I have asked a question about your dyk hook here. I do not understand what it means. Could you help me out? Regards, —mattisse (Talk) 20:16, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have made a alt hook suggestion at the above location. What do you think? Regards, —mattisse (Talk) 21:31, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your request

I went to edit the article, but I guess you are working on it. Would appreciate your not requesting a copy edit until you are out. LilHelpa (talk) 20:45, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Minuscule 544

On

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page

.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:00, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Minuscule 545

On

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page

.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:00, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Limits of the Five Patriarchates

Hello Leszek. I have reviewed your latest submission at DYK and there are some issues that may need addressing. Kindly Calmer Waters 09:16, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Limits of the Five Patriarchates

It would be very good if you could add the critical apparatus to the Greek Wikisource, where it is available to non-English readers. Andreas ^(T) 13:42, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of New Testament uncials/archive1

Can you reply to the comments on the FLC page so reviewers know what has and has not been completed? Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 17:10, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Christ's Agony at Gethsemane

otherlleft 19:57, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

DYK for Minuscule 569 (Gregory-Aland)

On

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page

.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:00, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Daniel Gotthilf Moldenhawer

On

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page

.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:01, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your request

Had a quick look and have to run. Please check the introduction. Did you mean to say he worked on several palimsests' texts or one palimsest's text? -- LilHelpa (talk) 16:44, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE: DYK

In response to this conversation: I'm not quite sure I understand. How should I change the nomination? I have just changed my comment to report the number of characters, rather than words, by which the article was expanded. Is that what you mean? Alekjds ^talk 18:27, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

your dyk hook for A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament

Hi, your dyk hook for A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament is not a 5x expansion. Please see here for an explanation. It needs over 3000 more characters to qualify. Thanks, —mattisse (Talk) 20:28, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

re edit count for article

See my talk page. Regards, —mattisse (Talk) 02:16, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(from my talk page) I have found that bot to be unreliable in picking up articles. So I would not depend on it if I were you. —mattisse (Talk) 02:32, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Christ's Agony at Gethsemane

On

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page

.

nominate

) 06:01, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

dyk hook problem

Hi, there is a problem with your dyk hook here. The hook in the article needs an inline citation after it. Thanks, —mattisse (Talk) 18:39, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Codex Carolinus

Hello Leszek, I have reviewed your recent submission at DYK... and have some questions regarding it before promotion. Thanks in advance. Kindly Calmer Waters 08:09, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Both nominations are well sourced; however, it appears just the hook facts are currently uncited for Codex Carolinus and Minuscule 614. If these facts can be cited, I see no reason for promotion to the main page. Thank you again for your diligence and outstanding article creations. Kindly Calmer Waters 17:35, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kubbet el Chazne

I am not exactly sure what Kubbet el Chazne is? I am fairly certain that it is not the National Museum of Damascus, which is called Mathaf el WaTany bieldamasq.

I can tell you that the word Kubbet (قبة) which is better transliterized with a Q (Qubba[t]) is usually used to refer to the dome of building, particularly the Islamic architecture of mosques. So Qubbet el Chazne most likely refers to some mosque somewhere, or at least its dome. But I'm not sure what the name Chazne here refers to.

Hope that helps.

codectified (talk) 21:47, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Franz Anton Knittel

On

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page

.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:17, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Minuscule 614

On

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page

.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:17, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Minuscule 629

Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Arctic Night 14:15, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

DYK nomination of Verlorene Siege

Hi Leszek, I've looked at your article on Verlorene Siege and would suggest that you give references to some of your claims: ie "Colonel-General von Rundstedt - brilliant exponent of grand tactics, a talented soldier who grasped the essentials of any problem in an instant." Is this Manstein's judgement or your own? Much of what you say doesn't make sense in English: "the German general staff had some concerns with Adolf Hitler. Hitler, despite the lack of education and preparation of military forces as a supervisor reached unprecedented success"; "End of the war looked from his property." Ericoides (talk) 07:55, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Colonel-General von Rundstedt - brilliant exponent of grand tactics, a talented soldier who grasped the essentials of any problem in an instant." Is this Manstein's judgement not mine?" I have no idea; you tell me. That is one of the problems of the article; the reader can't distinguish between quotes from Manstein and your own POV. Ericoides (talk) 10:31, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. I've put the quotation back into the article with quote marks; please would you use quote marks so that we can see which bits are being quoted and which bits are your own opinion. If you look at this diff you will see that the Manstein claim looked like your own.[3]. Was this a quote too: "He was a type of old-guard, man from a past." I can't believe it could be from an English translation as it is very badly written English and makes no sense. Was it your own translation from the German? It's all very confusing. Ericoides (talk) 10:45, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. The confusion in the article comes from your level of English. Eg what does this mean: "The global analysis, thin vision of " the moments of true » in battles, the consecutive description of optimum plans and not optimum actions — all this makes the book of Manstein as a handbook of strategy." It doesn't make sense. Ericoides (talk) 11:11, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Fulcran Vigouroux

On

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page

.

Congratulations! Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 18:13, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Minuscule 627

On

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page

.

Ucucha 18:11, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Minuscule 644

On

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page

.

Calmer Waters 06:04, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Minuscule 546

On

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page

.

Materialscientist (talk) 19:06, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Verlorene Siege

On

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page

.

—

majestic titan) 00:33, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

DYK for Biblioteca comunale Luciano Benincasa

On

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page

.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:04, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Minuscule 629

On

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page

.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:04, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations

Thanks and congrats for adding all the miniscule manuscript articles. it's a truly invaluable and absolutely historic service both to Wikipedia, the theological and biblical community, and to the knowledge base of humankind. i mean it! i'm a theology and biblical studies enthusiast. --Dpr (talk) 21:49, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Minuscule 642

I have left a question at Did you know about some wording in the hook for Minuscule 642. The article states that he brought the hooks over; however, the hook states that he purchased them but this is not yet in the article. I am sure he did both, but if you can add this to the article (as it is offline sourced), I can go ahead and approve it. I also left a note at the nomination, because I often show up at your submission with what seems like ....we'll I still need this or that :) Also disregard the English orientalist portion I discussed as I was mistaken. We'll take care, and keep up the good work :) Calmer Waters 08:03, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Birch

I'm trying to copy edit the article on

talk) 08:52, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

DYK for Minuscule 642

On

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page

.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:02, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Lectionary 187

On

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page

.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

25 DYK Creation/Expansion Medal

		The 25 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal
		Congratulations for reaching the milestone of 25 of your created articles appearing at Did you know. The variety of your contributions, including the articles on palaeography topics, are a great asset to the encyclopedia. Well done! Binksternet (talk) 15:46, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of British Library, Add. 14448

Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Thelmadatter (talk) 23:56, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

DYK nomination of Codex Arundel

Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Materialscientist (talk) 07:30, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

DYK for Andrew Birch

On

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page

.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:02, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for British Library, Add. 14448

On

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page

.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:04, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Arundel Codex
, etc

Please pay more attention to your categories. Also "Arundel Codex" is often seen, & should be a redirect. MS are not "currently housed in" etc, they are just "in". This information should be in the lead, regardless of the infobox. "Additional" etc should be spelt out in text, and "MS" included. Thanks. Johnbod (talk) 10:56, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Codex Arundel

On

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page

.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Minuscule 658, Minuscule 659, Minuscule 661

Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Storye book (talk) 13:16, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

DYK for Example

On

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page

.

Mifter (talk) 08:40, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Minuscule 655

Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ThaddeusB (talk) 20:26, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Novum Instrumentum omne

Hi Leszek Jańczuk, can you clarify "In 1512 he had been in negotiation with Badius Ascensius of Paris to publish Vulgate of Jerome and a new edition of Adagia. It did happen, and Erasmus did not continue contacts with Badius.[1]". Thanks. Pyrotec (talk) 18:16, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The main body of the article is OK, but the

WP:Lead needs some expansion to summarise the main points in the article. I've slightly expanded the Lead; if you could finish it off, I will award GA-status. Pyrotec (talk) 09:39, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

DYK nomination of Archangel Gospel

Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Storye book (talk) 17:14, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Erasmus

I've just noticed that you have been editing the Novum Instrumentum article. This is fascinating, as I am a fan of Erasmus's Encomium Mories, and I have a personal (unproven) suspicion that he and Thomas More's daughter cooked up the letters of Heloise and Abelard between them. I believe that only Erasmus's great mind could have written the Abelard letters. I would be interested to know whether you have come across any other theories on the origin of the letters. But please don't do any research to answer this - I'm just interested to know what you think. Please reply on my talk page if you have any comment.--Storye book (talk) 17:22, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Countenance divine

I have opened an AfD for

Countenance divine at WP:Articles for deletion/Countenance divine if you are interested. Tb (talk) 01:24, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

DYK for Archangel Gospel

On

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page

.

Materialscientist (talk) 16:42, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kodeks Aleksandryjski na polskich Wikiźródłach

Cześć! Na polskich Wikiźródłach opracowujemy właśnie Encyklopedję kościelną z 1873 r. Tak się składa, że pierwszym hasłem w tej encyklopedii jest "A", czyli Kodeks Aleksandryjski. Niestety, mamy problem w jego przepisywaniu - mianowicie, tekst encyklopedii zawiera kilka liter greckich. Nikt w projekcie nie zna greki, litery są nieco niewyraźne, a na dodatek nie ma ich w alfabecie greckim (znaczy, że to jakaś starsza forma), i nie bardzo potrafimy je przepisać. Jeżeli chodzi o Kodeks Aleksandryjski i ogólnie manuskrypty, jesteś bez wątpienia najlepiej zorientowaną osobą na Wikipedii, i jeżeli tylko miałbyś chwilę czasu, bylibyśmy bardzo wdzięczni za udzielenie pomocy. Strona z hasłem znajduje się tutaj - s:pl:Strona:PL Nowodworski-Encyklopedia koscielna T.1 016.jpeg. Serdecznie pozdrawiam --Teukros (talk) 20:01, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your
GA nomination of Dura Parchment 24

The article Dura Parchment 24 you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Dura Parchment 24 for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 01:30, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for National Library of Russia, Codex Syriac 1

On

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page

.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:10, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament

Hi Leszek Jańczuk, I have left comments on Talk:A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament/GA1. Pyrotec (talk) 16:39, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

jakew

regarding the edit war i have with jakew

i posted an message on his talk page in which i explained why i made my edits and asked him to explain why eh keeps changing my work he has deleted it and replaced it with the following comment

Thank you. It's very thoughtful of you to let me know. Jakew (talk) 21:17, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

i posted a comment on jakew talk page explaining why i changed his edits and asked him why he changed mine he replied with this

Thank you. It's very thoughtful of you to let me know. Jakew (talk) 21:17, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

this response does not give any insight into why he keeps changing my work

i believe that he is maliciously changing my work

circumsison is a matter over which many people have strong fealings. in the past wars have been fought over it and many people still do it regardless of what the law may say. for this reason i suspect that jakew may be sabotaging my work because he has strong personal fealings about the matter

jakew has posted a lot of articles, however due to the extreame fealings some people have regarding circumsision is suspect that he may be chanlengeing my edits which mostly opose circumsision because h has stong fealings about it himself.--82.24.163.100 (talk) 22:42, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Otto Thott

Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Jujutacular ^T · C 21:30, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

DYK for Euthalian Apparatus

On

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page

.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:03, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Codex Marchalianus

On

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page

.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:04, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Differences between codices Sinaiticus and Vaticanus

On

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page

.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Minuscule 671

On

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page

.

Materialscientist (talk) 16:04, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Otto Thott

On

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page

.

Materialscientist (talk) 16:04, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Lectionary 216

nominate

) 16:02, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Samuel Thomas Bloomfield

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Samuel Thomas Bloomfield, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://chestofbooks.com/reference/American-Cyclopaedia-14/Samuel-Thomas-Bloomfield-Samuel-Whitbread.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on

talk) 21:11, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

FYI, if the page that was tagged merely repeats verbatim the information from American Cyclopedia (which appears to be the case), you can stick with the original wording if you'd rather since anything pre 1923 is public domain. VernoWhitney (talk) 21:27, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Lectionary 220, Lectionary 223

Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry

and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

Sorry for bringing this up so late. Espresso Addict (talk) 08:52, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Minuscule 686

Glad to see another of your wonderful Minuscule articles, but with this one I'm wondering if we can get a more mainstream-accessible hook? I had no idea what "so called Jerusalem Colophon" meant, and neither Minuscule 686 nor Jerusalem Colophon were particularly enlightening. Can we get a hook that might be more readable to a casual main-page browser? If you add one, feel free to let me know on my talk page and I'll revisit the nomination. - DustFormsWords (talk) 07:46, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lectionary 226

This is an automated message from

Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary

to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on

talk) 11:10, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Lectionary 227

This is an automated message from

Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary

to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on

talk) 11:39, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

DYK for Oriental MS 424

nominate

) 08:02, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Lectionary 220

nominate

) 16:03, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Lectionary 223

nominate

) 16:04, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Minuscule 686

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks for this one, cheers Victuallers (talk) 08:02, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Codex Vaticanus

Hi, I thought I'd let you know that as part of

talk) 15:06, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

DYK for Minuscule 697

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks for this one Victuallers (talk) 00:03, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you very much for the Copyeditor's Barnstar. That was a nice surprise! I'm not completely done, but wanted to wait for a few days before I come back to it. At this point it only needs a little more polishing. It's really an informative article, and I enjoyed working on it.

talk) 01:32, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

A barnstar

		The Christianity Barnstar
		I'm not sure if anyone's given you a barnstar yet for your series of articles on lectionaries and minuscules, but if not it's about time you had one. DustFormsWords (talk) 04:45, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Lectionary 232

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:02, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK problem

Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Little Mountain 5 00:09, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

DYK for Lectionary 228

nominate

) 18:02, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Hunterian Collection

Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry

and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

Interesting subject! I've heard of the Hunterian Collection (in the context of early books on anatomy) but never realised it included coins. However, I think you need to select a different hook, unless the "finest" is supported by an independent source. Espresso Addict (talk) 17:47, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your continued work on this. Espresso Addict (talk) 00:26, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Lectionary 226

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks for the article Victuallers (talk) 06:02, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work!

Just wanted to say awesome work on biblical manuscripts you have done so far! Omegastar (talk) 11:20, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Minuscule 699

nominate

) 12:01, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Minuscule 716

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Minuscule 716, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.reachinformation.com/define/Minuscule_716.aspx. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on

talk) 17:30, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

DYK for Lectionary 239

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 12:02, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Lectionary 240

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 12:03, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Lectionary 241

nominate

) 18:02, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Charles de Condren

nominate

) 12:03, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Hunterian Collection

nominate

) 12:04, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

50 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal

		The 50 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal
		Congratulations are in order upon the occasion of your reaching the milestone of 50 articles which you created or expanded, submitted to "Did you know?" and appearing on the Main page! Your efforts have substantially improved the encyclopedia. Well done! Binksternet (talk) 18:56, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply ]

DYK for Minuscule 714

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 12:03, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Minuscule 715

nominate

) 12:03, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Kaiser Wilhelm Society

I am sorry I reverted your edits. It was an accident. I was trying to revert the IP's edtits, when Huggle decided it was going to be clever and revert yours as well! Again, I am sorry. :) --Mithrandir^Again (Talk!) 23:07, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Wow, thanks for these speedy edits! Regards! See you around. --_Sulmues^{Let's talk} 19:45, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, drop by if you need my help with any translation from Albanian. --_Sulmues^{Let's talk} 21:04, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

		The Literary Barnstar
		I will be glad to award this barnstar for your work on the two Berat Codices work in particular (Codex_Beratinus and Beratinus 2), and in general on the hundreds of articles you have created on uncials, codices and old bibles. Actually this is kind of the wrong barnstar, because there should be a Leszek barnstar from now on. Please accept my personal recognition and admiration! Thank you! _Sulmues^{Let's talk} 17:46, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Codex Tischendorfianus III

Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — Rlevse • Talk • 01:29, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Pls archive a lot of this talk page ;-) — Rlevse • Talk • 01:30, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

seriously?

Philip Ojha (better known as "Father" Ojha), infamous Nepalese religious figure, founder of the Church of DotA, first apostle in the Book of Brian Peppers, coiner of the phrase "Do You Scream?" used in the popular film Batman Molests 2011. He is currently serving a life imprisonment in the Correctional Facility in Stockholm, Sweden following a sexual assault case. This is obvious vandalism.84.136.206.1 (talk) 20:11, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed it is. Please take more care in reverting. –xeno^talk 22:58, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Borg in-Nadur

Thanks for adding that category to Borg in-Nadur apparitions. Do you know Biblical Greek ? ( I'm studying at the moment ). Alan347 (talk) 17:25, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Codex Tischendorfianus III

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 18:01, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Biblical Greek

Good morning Leszek Jańczuk, I'm continuing to study the Greek, what I'm doing is reading it out in Greek http://biblos.com/mark/1-3.htm, with the help of the interlinear translation. Hope this gets me to a new phase where I start understanding the Greek directly. For the recorded manuscripts, I can always refer to your User page. Thanks. Alan347 (talk) 08:14, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're editing at a rate of once every 3 minutes

Please stop blindly editing/reverting articles you've never read or contributed, as you did to anti-Americanism.

talk) 02:21, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Burki

Please read the secion on Burki before you undo. This piece is purly opinion which is in violation of Wiki Policy. Kindly undo the reveret. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 2010khan (talk • contribs) 19:51, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Bibliothèque municipale de Besançon

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:03, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Nicolas Perrenot de Granvelle

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:03, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not

autoconfirmed

to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious

Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here

.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 03:56, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Codex Copticus Tischendorfianus I

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 18:02, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Oscar Eduardovich Lemm

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 18:03, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Codex Vaticanus and GA tag

Curious as to why you would preemptively place the GA tag on this article, [4], when it has not been passed as a GA? -- Cirt (talk) 08:49, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you. -- Cirt (talk) 08:50, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Fifty Bibles of Constantine

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

-- Cirt (talk) 18:03, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Small correction in the Codex Sinaiticus needed

Dear Leszek, Please take at look at the end of the second paragraph in the History of the Codex -> Scribes and corrector section. There's clearly some referencing typo, but I can't figure out what you had in mind. Many thanks for your superb work!!!--Opera Omnia (talk) 22:38, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

742

Why not have at the 742 article located at

Minuscule 742 (Gregory-Aland)? There doesn't seem the need for the disambiguation parenthetical "Gregory-Aland". We should probably have a consistent naming convention for manuscript articles, so I'm curious why you added the longer title for 742's article name? -Andrew c ^[talk] 00:07, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Consistency on P98

So in regards to your edit, does that mean that the recto text was written first and then the Revelation text was written on the same paper decades later? Or does it mean that the previous date mentioned in the opening of the article is wrong? I'm confused, and all I'm asking for is consistency. The opening says "late 2nd century", and then the paragraph about the recto says late first to early second. It just seems inconsistent. At the very least, if it is after all the case that the two sides were written at different times, then perhaps that should be made a little more clear in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.40.18.26 (talk) 21:25, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Scrolls were written on one side only. In sometimes also another side was written (opistographa) but with different text and scroll was rolled in different way. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 21:35, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay(sorry to keep pestering you), so if I am understanding you correctly, you are confirming that the recto & verso were written in two different decades, is that correct? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.40.18.26 (talk) 21:44, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly. Thanks for your attention, because this text was not clear enough. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 21:50, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Codex Nanianus

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 06:03, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ernst von Dobschütz

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 18:02, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Codex Glazier

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:02, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Family E

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

-- Cirt (talk) 06:02, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Eberhard Nestle

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:02, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Codex Vaticanus 2061

Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! AngChenrui (talk) 13:16, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

DYK for Codex Vaticanus 2061

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 18:03, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Codex Boreelianus

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 06:02, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and appreciation

I appreciate the work you've put in for New Testament manuscripts. Stephen C. Carlson (talk) 13:13, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Friedrich Münter

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:02, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for University of Fulda

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:02, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Codex Cyprius

nominate

) 18:02, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Minuscule 759 (Gregory-Aland)

nominate

) 00:02, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Waverley House, Bristol

The article Waverley House, Bristol has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet the
WP:GNG
.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page

.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{

dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:56, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Edit Summaries

Hiya. Remember the good old days, when you commendably always supplied a

wp:ES

?

But now, whilst you do stacks of edits & get stacks of DYKs, you're setting a very bad example in ESs.

Shame - couldn't you try a bit harder? Trafford09 (talk) 18:16, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Codex Vaticanus

I have recently made an edit to this article which I think may have been a poor judgement on my part. The Codex Vaticanus was said to have 759 leaves, which I could not see the importance of. Is that number significant? Does the Bible have a set number of leaves (sections) that it should have? Is this a measure of its completeness? --Screwball23 talk 02:06, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BnF categories

See Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2010_August_19#Category:Holdings_of_the_Biblioth.C3.A8que_nationale_de_France

List of Hebrew Bible manuscripts

DYK nomination of List of Hebrew Bible manuscripts

Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BabelStone (talk) 23:45, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Skokie, Illinois

I am completely baffled. What did you actually do in these two edits?[5][6] HuskyHuskie (talk) 01:53, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could you take a moment to answer my question, please? HuskyHuskie (talk) 13:45, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Waldron IV

Thanks for your fixes.RWIR (talk) 05:49, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Lectionary 269

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:03, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for List of Hebrew Bible manuscripts

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 18:02, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Family 1739

Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Materialscientist (talk) 23:28, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Good edits on William Shockley article--thanks.

I see you have been improving the William Shockley article and reverting vandalism there besides. Keep up the good work. P.S. I'm very interested to see that you have done so many articles on papyri and uncials. I used to study textual criticism of the New Testament quite a bit, so it's great to see that that subject is well covered in Wikipedia. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk) 20:18, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Family 1739

nominate

) 00:03, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Minuscule 113

nominate

) 12:02, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Bernard de Montfaucon

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 18:02, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nani

Znam Ciebie z plwiki, więc mogę napisać po polsku. Nie rozumiem dlaczego cofnąłeś dobrą edycję IPka w tym haśle. Usunął on ewidentny wandalizm dotyczący jego rzekomego transferu do Aston Villi, co oczywiście jest nieprawdą. PS. (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RS

[7] Please show me where this site has proven that it has a reputation for fact checking and accuracy. Active Banana ( ^bananaphone 20:33, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Codex Vaticanus

I left a comment on the talk page in regards to the language per the editor; hopefully that can be looked at and dealt with soon, since it's been at GA a while now. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 19:42, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Zuckerberg

I stared and stared at the differences between the Zuckerberg article before you made your "minor" change and after, and I simply could not see what you did. What did you change, and is there a way for me to see it better because it shows SO much text in green, it's hard to figure out sometimes. Usually, if I look long enough, I finally see something in red, either on the right or on the left, but I couldn't with yours.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:08, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. The software should color the spaces red.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:31, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination for Lectionary 283 and Biblioteca Communale

Hello, your nomination of Lectionary 283 and Biblioteca Communale at DYK was reviewed and comments provided. --NortyNort (Holla) 12:24, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, the nomination is good now. Thanks for the quick reply. --NortyNort (Holla) 12:46, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Revert my edit

Excuse me, but why did you just revert my edit. The 2010 Summer Live Music Fest is a festival with all sorts of acts. Alesha was not supporting Mcfly, she was simply performing at Sandown Park Racecourse alongside other acts like Mcfly and Tinchy Stryder. Furthermore, she states she doesn't work with Xenomania on her new album here: [8] 79.69.224.213 (talk) 23:20, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Lectionary 283

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:04, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Biblioteca Communale (Siena)

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:04, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Minuscule 782 (Gregory-Aland)

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:04, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

George Nathaniel Henry Peters

Hello Leszek. I know you are interested in theology and Biblical studies. This article (a 19th century American Lutheran) is nominated for deletion for the third time since June 2010. I'm not sure if you have any expertise exactly in this area, however, I believe that you could provide a more competent analysis than most of us commentators at AfD. Thanks for any opinion and my apologies if you are not interested. Best regards. --

Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 07:30, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Ok, the AfD was speedy closed. Thanks. --

Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 08:13, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

2009-10 NHL season

What is your reason for removing this edit? [9] Rusted AutoParts (talk 10:31, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

/* Rajesh khanna filmography */

We need your help in filling up the column of directors - which you can get from http://www.citwf.com/person241842.htm in the article rajesh khanna filmography in wikipedia.As you seen to be interested in working in wikipedia articles we would be gald if you contribute in filling up the DIRECTORS cloumn and in the NOTES column fill up the awards won and nominations won by khanna against a particular film.Shrik88music (talk) 14:39, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contribution but sorry to say but lots of dates have been changed very unnessarily and many films with Khanna have been deleted too. I have put forward what needs to be changed and how similar it should be with the list i have pasted down and i hope u take in right spirit and make the changes happily.. .Total rajesh khanna films must be 3 added by you and 153 already mentioned. 1)In notes column add the follwing details for the following films needs to be mentioned.

1972 – Winner
BFJA Awards, Best Actor for Anand^[1]

1973 – Winner BFJA Awards, Best Actor for Bawarchi^[2]
1974 – Winner BFJA Awards, Best Actor for Namak Haraam^[3]
1987 – Winner BFJA Awards, Best Actor for Amrit^[4]

and 1982 – Winner Lions Club, New Delhi– Best Actor Award for Dard 1994 – Winner Russian Film Festival, Ujvegistan- Best Actor for Khudai and

Won

1971 –
Filmfare Best Actor Award for Sachaa Jhutha

1972 – Filmfare Best Actor Award for Anand

1975 – Filmfare Best Actor Award for Avishkaar

Nominated

1970 – Filmfare Best Actor Award for Aradhana
1970 – Filmfare Best Actor Award for Ittefaq
1971 – Filmfare Best Actor Award for Kati Patang
1973 – Filmfare Best Actor Award for Dushman (1972)
1973 – Filmfare Best Actor Award for Amar Prem
1974 – Filmfare Best Actor Award for Daag: A Poem of Love
1975 – Filmfare Best Actor Award for Prem Nagar
1980 – Filmfare Best Actor Award for Amardeep
1981 – Filmfare Best Actor Award for Thodisi Bewafaii
1982 – Filmfare Best Actor Award for Dard
1984 – Filmfare Best Actor Award for Avtaar

2)thanks for adding khoon aur pani,Ram Tere Kitne Nam and 1987 Raj Kapoor Himself but Khoon aur paani i doubt as it did not hav e rajesh khanna. where from you got the data about this film having Khanna? but the following which are either missing from imbd or citwf were added me by me and are now missing......they are needed to be added back as they have been searched by me after watching those films and they are available in different sites and articles. ........... Sundara Satarkar (Marathi Movie -1981,Dushman Dost of 1981 Rekha and Reena Roy,Bayen Hath Ka Khel - Tina Munim of 1985,Hathyara (1977) - Special Appearance,Ayaash (1982) Rati Agnihotri - Special Appearance Shakti Samanta , and Dushman (1990) - Special Appearance Shakti Samanta... and the 1968 film reads Shrimanji in the film credits and not Srimanji

3)1972 filmfare awards was won by Rajesh Khanna - Anand as Anand Saigal and the film was released in 1971 and Premnagar was nominated in 1975 filmfare awards and was released in 1974. 4)do not delete anything only add things. please ensure that the order of film release is as follows which is right..... 5)Kati Patang was released in 1971 and got nominated in 1972 filmfare awards as Rajesh Khanna - Kati Patang as Kamal Sinha and similarly Dushman and Amar Prem were released in 1972 and got nominated in 1973 held filmfare function and Aavishkar was released in 1974 and Khanna won in 1975. 6)The Year of the film release is perfectly laid down below please ensure filmography is in following ORDER and the spelling of the film is as follows...The filography as edited by you should be now modified as follows

Aakhri Khat(1966 film) Indrani Mukherjee
Raaz (1967 film) (1967) Babita
Baharon Ke Sapne (1967) Asha Parekh
Aurat (1967 film) Nazima
Shrimanji (1968 film)
Aradhana (1969 film) (1969) Sharmila Tagore
Ittefaq (film 1969) Nanda
Doli (1969) Babita
Bandhan (1969 film) Mumtaz
Do Raaste (1970) Mumtaz
Khamoshi (1970) Waheeda Rehman
The Train (1970 film) Nanda
Sachaa Jhutha (1970) Mumtaz
Safar (film) (1970) Sharmila Tagore
Kati Patang (1971) Asha Parekh
Anand (1971)
Aan Milo Sajna (1971) Asha Parekh
Andaaz (1971) Hema Malini
Maryada (1971) Mala Sinha
Chhoti Bahu (1971) Sharmila Tagore
Haathi Mere Saathi (1971) Tanuja
Guddi (1971)
Mehboob Ki Mehndi (1971) Leena Chandavarkar
Badnaam Farishte (1971) Sharmila Tagore - Special Appearance
Dushman
(1972) Mumtaz
Amar Prem (1972) Sharmila Tagore
Apna Desh (1972) Mumtaz
Dil Daulat Duniya (1972) Sadhana
Bawarchi (1972) Jaya Bhaduri
Joroo Ka Ghulam (1972) Nanda
Mere Jeevan Saathi (1972 film)(1972) Tanuja
Maalik (1972) Sharmila Tagore
Shehzada (1972) Rakhee
Anuraag
(1973) Nutan
Raja Rani (1973) Sharmila Tagore
Daag: A Poem of Love
(1973) Sharmila Tagore/Rakhee
Namak Haraam (1973)Rekha
Avishkaar (1974) Sharmila Tagore
Humshakal (1974) Tanuja/ Moushumi Chatterjee
Aap Ki Kasam (1974) Mumtaz
Prem Nagar (1974) Hema Malini
Ajnabee (1974 film) (1974) Zeenat Aman
Roti (1974) Mumtaz
Badhti Ka Naam Dadhi (1974)
Prem Kahani (1975) Mumtaz
Ginny Aur Johnny (1975) - Special Appearance
Aakraman (1975) - Special Appearance
Sawa Lakh Se Ek Ladaun (1976) Neetu Singh - Special Appearance
Maha Chor (1976) Neetu Singh
Bandalbaaz
(1976) Sulakshana Pandit
Mehbooba (1976) Hema Malini
Tyaag (1977) Sharmila Tagore
Karm (1977) Vidya Sinha/Shabana Azmi
Chhaila Babu (1977) Zeenat Aman
Chalta Purza (1977) Parveen Babi
Anurodh (1977) Simple Kapadia
Aashiq Hoon Baharon Ka (1977) Zeenat Aman
Aaina (1977) Mumtaz - Special Appearance
Tinku (1977) - Special Appearance
Hathyara (1977) - Special Appearance
Palkon Ki Chhaon Mein (1977) Hema Malini
Chakravyuha (1978) Neetu Singh
Bhola Bhala (1978) Rekha/Moushumi Chatterjee
Naukri (1978) Zahira
Til Til Dalekha (1979) Punjabi Hit Film
Muqabla (1979) Rekha - Special Appearance
Janata Havaldar
(1979) Hema Malini /Yogeeta Bali
Amar Deep (1979) Shabana Azmi
Prem Bandhan (1979) Rekha/ Moushumi Chatterjee
Phir Wohi Raat
(1980) Kim
Bandish (1980) Hema Malini
Thodisi Bewafaii (1980) Shabana Azmi
Red Rose (1980) Poonam Dhillon
Aanchal (1980) Rekha/Rakhee
Kudrat (1981) Hema Malini
Sundara Satarkar (Marathi Movie -1981)
Fiffty Fiffty (1981) Tina Munim
Dhanwan (1981) Reena Roy
Dard (1981) Hema Malini/Poonam Dhillon
Naseeb (1981) Sharmila Tagore - Guest Artist
Dushman Dost (1981) Rekha/Reena Roy
Jaanwar (1982) Zeenat Aman
Dil-E-Nadan
(1982) Jaya Prada
Ashanti (1982) Shabana Azmi/Zeenat Aman/Parveen Babi
Suraag
(1982) Tina Munim /Asha Sachdev- Special Appearance
Rajput (1982) Hema Malini
Dharam Kanta (1982) Reena Roy
Ayaash (1982) Rati Agnihotri - Special Appearance
Nishaan
(1983) Poonam Dhillon
Avtaar (1983) Shabana Azmi
Souten (1983) Padmini Kolhapuri/Tina Munim
Agar Tum Na Hote (1983) Rekha
Disco Dancer (1983)
Paapi Pet Ka Sawaal Hai (1984) Jaya Prada/Tina Munim
Maqsad (1984) Sridevi
Dharam Aur Kanoon
(1984) Asha Parekh/ Jaya Prada
Awaaz (1984) Jaya Prada
Aaj Ka M.L.A. Ram Avtar (1984) Shabana Azmi
Asha Jyoti (1984) Rekha/Reena Roy
Naya Kadam (1984) Jaya Prada/Sridevi /Padmini Kolhapuri
Zamana (1985) Poonam Dhilon
Oonche Log (1985) Salma Agha
Naya Bakra (1985) Reena Roy - Special Appearance
Masterji (1985) Sridevi
Insaaf Main Karoonga (1985) Tina Munim/Padmini Kolhapure
Durga (1985) Hema Malini
Aakhir Kyon? (1985) Smita Patil
Bewafai (1985) Tina Munim/Padmini Kolhapuri /Meenakshi Seshadri
Hum Dono (1985) Hema Malini/Reena Roy
Alag Alag (1985) Tina Munim
Babu (1985) Hema Malini/RatiAgnihotri
Bayen Haath Ka Khel
(1985) Tina Munim
Awara Baap (1985) Meenakshi Seshadri/Madhuri Dixit
Shatru (1986) Shabana Sadique
Mohabbat Ki Kasam (1986) Jaya Prada
Angaarey
(1986) Smita Patil
Ghar Pariwar (1986) Moushumi Chatterjee
Amrit (1986) Smita Patil
Adhikar (1986) Tina Munim/Zarina Wahab
Nasihat (1986) Shabana Azmi
Anokha Rishta (1986) Smita Patil
Sitapur Ki Geeta (1987) Hema Malini
Nazrana (1987) Sridevi/Smita Patil
Awam (film) (1987) Poonam Dhillon
Goraa (1987) Sulakshana Pandit
Woh Phir Aayegi (1988) Farha
Vijay (1988) Hema Malini
Main Tera Dushman (1989) Jaya Prada - Guest Artist
Mamta ki Chhaon Mein (1989) Leena Chandavarkar - Special Appearance
Ghar Ka Chiraag (1989) Deepika/Neelam
Paap Ka Ant (1989) Hema Malini - Special Appearance
Swarg (1990) Madhavi
Dushman (1990) - Special Appearance
Rupaye Dus Karod (1991) Amrita Singh
Begunah (1991) Farha
Jai Shiv Shankar(1992)
Khudai (1994) Deepika
Kis Kaam Ke Yeh Rishte (1995)
Sautela Bhai (1996) Moushumi Chatterjee
Aa Ab Laut Chalen (1999) Moushumi Chatterjee
Pyaar Zindagi Hai (2001)
Kyaa Dil Ne Kahaa (2002)
Classic Dance of Love
(2005) - Special Appearance
Jana: Let's fall in love (2006) Zeenat Aman - Special Appearance
Om Shanti Om
(2007)
Jaanleva (2008) Rati Agnihotri
Wafa: A deadly love story
(2008) Laila Khan
Kash Mere Hote (2009)
Do Dilon Ke Khel Mein (2010)
Phir Tum Mil Gaye (unreleased)
Hello Kaun Hai (unreleased) Rati Agnihotri/Sara khan
Door Door Sat Samandar Paar (unreleased)
Police Ke Peechhe Police(unreleased)

Shrik88music (talk) 20:31, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Minuscule 482

Adabow (talk · contribs) 01:01, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

September 2010

In a recent edit to the page Miami Vice (film), you changed one or more words from one international variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Srobak (talk) 13:36, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination for Tivoli Friheden

Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry

and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --

talk) 20:23, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

DYK for Minuscule 788 (Gregory-Aland)

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:03, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Hi Leszek, I don't understand the point of your remark below my DYK submission for Eccles. Regards, Ericoides 08:14, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see. Thanks. Ericoides 09:53, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Minuscule 482

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:05, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Tivoli Friheden

talk) 18:16, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Happy Leszek Jańczuk's Day!

Leszek Jańczuk has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian,
so I've officially declared today as Leszek Jańczuk's Day!
For being a great person and awesome Wikipedian,
enjoy being the star of the day, Leszek Jańczuk!

Signed, Neutralhomer

A record of your Day will always be kept here.

For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, click here. Have a Great Day...Neutralhomer • Talk • 04:25, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Judgment of God listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Judgment of God. Since you had some involvement with the Judgment of God redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 18:59, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Judgment of God for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Judgment of God, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judgment of God until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 18:59, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of The Temptation of Barbizon

Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:36, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

DYK for Adams River

Hi Leszek, just wanted to tell you I expanded the Adams River in order to meet DYK criteria. Do you mind confirming its eligibility status? (Bit worried as the 5 days rule is almost up!) Thanks, The Interior (Talk) 20:08, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks leszek, The Interior (Talk) 04:20, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for The Temptation of Barbizon

nominate

) 18:02, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Minor edits

I noticed you are making a large number of minor edits with only the explanation "minor". When I view the diff for, as an example, Tropical year, I am unable to tell what was changed. Would you please explain the reason and benefit of these changes? Jc3s5h (talk) 18:00, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Codex Floriacensis

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:05, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Query

Hi, was wondering if you could do a DYK review. The hook is at Template_talk:Did_you_know#For_November_3. There are no remaining actionable opposes:

The page has been expanded over 5x.
Every single sentence in the article is sourced.
The hook is sourced to two online refs.
After discussion at
T:TDYK
, the hook was moved to wait to be displayed on November 3, 2010, the day after the election, so as to address complaints about having it go up before the election.

Just would appreciate having the hook reviewed and confirmed as to the above points, so it does not have to continue sitting there, unapproved and unreviewed.

Thank you for your time, -- Cirt (talk) 04:51, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Did you get a chance to take a look? ;) -- Cirt (talk) 22:51, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

La Bande à papa

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of La Bande à papa, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://filmsdefrance.com/FDF_La_Bande_a_papa_rev.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not

talk) 09:33, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

DYK for
Fall of Agadir

Hi, I notice you're approving hooks even though the article has unformatted references. You may want to read

Rule D3 applies. Best, Yoninah (talk) 21:59, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Alf (barque)

I've reverted your edit because the date is the Danish spelling of the word "February" per the source - click on linked webpage and you'll see what I mean. Mjroots (talk) 06:57, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

P.S Time to do some archiving?

Talk:Codex Cyprius/GA1

I've reviewed the article and left notes on the talk page. I've put the nomination on hold for seven days to allow the issues to be addressed. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, here, or on the article talk page with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:15, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Le Diable et les Dix Commandements

Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! PM800 (talk) 04:45, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

DYK nomination of Candide ou l'optimisme au XXe siècle

Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 18:54, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Codex Boreelianus

Hi Leszek Jańczuk, I am happy to wait until Wednesday/Thursday until you have your sources. It now mostly done, but I will just keep the review On Hold. Pyrotec (talk) 12:52, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Peter Frederik Suhm

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:05, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ru:Письмо (письменность)

Это ставится в категориях, в Письменности уже есть. М? (отвечать здесь) -- Abc82 (talk) 17:14, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of EastEnders characters

Hi, just thought I'd let you know that you reverted an IP's "test edits" but actually they were fixing a broken reference and table. Anemone Projectors 18:06, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Papyrus 6

Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! - Tim1965 (talk) 01:03, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Your help is appreciate

Hi, can you please assist on a article issue Mario Kleff? I need some help there as it is nominate for deletion. Many thanks! Mario Kleff worked on/with Book of Kells, and thought a man with your reputation can tell more what's wrong. SaksitVongaram (talk) 20:52, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]