User talk:MOTORAL1987

• Please note: Per request on my talk page, this article has been restored and the
  deletion discussion has been re-opened. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 14:07, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double
  inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners
  , for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is
  Wikipedia:Copy-paste
  .
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 00:10, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm KNHaw. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events have been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. KNHaw ^(talk) 21:19, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article British political crisis, 2016 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This appears to be a largely factually accurate account of somewhat related major political events but their portrayal as one recognised phenomenon and characterisation as a crisis seems to be unsupported, novel and POV.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mutt Lunker (talk) 11:14, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the
  Results of the United Kingdom Alternative Vote referendum, 2011 page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help
  )

Hello, MOTORAL1987. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For some reason that I don't understand, I'm not being given the option to give an edit note on my reversion of your addition of a flag to

The dates & locations given in the text and in the infobox do not agree. Cabayi (talk) 11:11, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I see in a recent addition to European Union (Finance) Act 2015 you included material from a webpage that is available under an Open Parliament Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this legal requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:50, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted all the page moves, as "YYYY Cricket World Cup" is correct as per

On a similar note, regarding your recent move of

WP:ANI over problematic page moving, with the result that they are either restricted from moving pages at all, or end up blocked. Would rather not see that happen if at all possible. Mjroots (talk) 12:40, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Point taken look I am sorry for not consultanting the talk page first and I apologise but I don't like some of the personal stuff that has been thrown at me in response, I just have a slightly different view of things but all on the same boat and I think it's really sad that my slight different views can't be quite taken into account what's the difference between using the word fire or disaster? (MOTORAL1987 (talk) 12:44, 24 June 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Fire is less "tabloid", but if anyone searches for "Grenfell Tower disaster", the redirect will get them to the article. Have asked at Grenfell Tower fire talk page for people to back off a bit. Mjroots (talk) 12:47, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. MOTORAL1987, thanks for creating European Communities (Amendment) Act 2002!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

Boleyn (talk) 19:53, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. MOTORAL1987, thanks for creating European Union (Approval of Treaty Amendment Decision) Act 2012!

I've just tagged the page, using our

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

Boleyn (talk) 19:54, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Proposed second United Kingdom European Union membership / final deal referendum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources are given

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 05:47, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've undone your page move and started discussion at

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Proposed second United Kingdom European Union membership / final deal referendum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proposed second United Kingdom European Union membership / final deal referendum until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 14:40, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you do me a favor and revert the nibiru prediction again on the list of predicted apocalypses? Someone added it again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ROBDude (talk • contribs) 17:17, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MOTORAL1987. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think you've been editing {{2018 Winter Olympics Calendar}} whilst logged out. Primefac (talk) 18:43, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You've just broken

I have reverted as I was not aware of this rule I apologies I am just very frustrated at this problem. (MOTORAL1987 (talk) 19:08, 30 March 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Thank you. I'm sorry you're frustrated, but we have a referendum template for a reason – to ensure consistency. When people start making up their own templates, we lose that consistency, and it can then become a problem on other articles when editors see a table in one article and start making arguments along the lines of "if it's ok there, why can't we use it here" etc. Number 57 19:09, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is been no problem until today with the template for the EU referendum, in fact I have built on the template and used it in other articles as I think it’s much clearer to see and also it has a nice professional quality to it and I am really upset that it’s no longer accepted when it’s been on the article for about a year. (MOTORAL1987 (talk) 19:13, 30 March 2018 (UTC))[reply]

It doesn't matter that something hasn't been identified as a problem for a certain amount of time – some issues on Wikipedia are not corrected for many years. And it was creating problems because people were occasionally trying to copy the format into other articles. Again, I'm sorry that you're upset, but really you should never have created a non-standard table in the first place when we already had an existing one. I think the template also violates

WP:MOSICON as there is no reason for the flag to be included. Number 57 19:17, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Well good luck with all the reverting as virtually all UK referendum articles carry this version of the template and I am very proud of my work regardless of weither it has broken rules or not. (MOTORAL1987 (talk) 19:24, 30 March 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Just to let you know, if you revert across any of the articles again, then I'm going to be requesting that your main account is blocked. If you then continue to edit through IPs, all your edits will be immediately reverted and the block on your main account will be extended significantly. Number 57 11:36, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating

Wikipedia editor Kudpung just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please correct the grammar and spelling

To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.

Learn more about

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:31, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. MOTORAL1987, thanks for creating Drought Act 1976!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

Boleyn (talk) 20:36, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this is going to be much more differcult than I expected as the Act is not available on UK legislation and also there are hardly any links which provide information about the Act itself, what I used and thought was correct was wrong. (MOTORAL1987 (talk) 20:51, 5 July 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Ah, don't worry. I'll move it from mainspace to draftspace and then you can work on it there and move it back when/if you find a good source. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 06:20, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

First of all I do sincerely apologise for this outcome, I made a missive mistake when I capitalise the deputy first Minister when I titled it as “First Minister and Depty First Minister of Northern Ireland and I am trying to change it to to “First Minister and depty first Minister of Northern Ireland” however my efforts have lost the talk page as a result, please can you help so we can have a correct and proper title for this article along with its talk page. (MOTORAL1987 (talk) 18:18, 15 August 2018 (UTC))[reply]

I don't have the right permissions to do what you need. I would ask at requested moves. I would expect it to be an uncontroversial move. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 19:19, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

Hi there i am aware however I have accidentally made a botch up, there is a full template however I have moved the template several times all the links to each other have been loads can you go in, find and link them all back up and so we can just have one template under the title Poitics of the British Indian Ocean Territory. (MOTORAL1987 (talk) 19:52, 10 October 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CASSIOPEIA was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help

). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Politics of the British Indian Ocean Territory and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  db-self
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

talk) 10:10, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, MOTORAL1987! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the talk) 10:10, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply ]

Ways to improve The European Union Referendum (Conduct) Regulations 2016

Hi, I'm Boleyn.

Thanks for creating

The European Union Referendum (Conduct) Regulations 2016

.

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix.

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 06:30, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating

A

Please add references to all your creations.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 08:13, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MOTORAL1987. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I personally like the Olympic Calendars for each Olympic games being interactive. Just wondering why you removed this feature.

I don’t understand what you mean, please explain more so I can understand? (MOTORAL1987 (talk) 18:28, 8 February 2019 (UTC))[reply]

An article you recently created,

Hello, MOTORAL1987. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Phospheros (talk) 17:50, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MOTORAL1987. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 16:09, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

Hello, MOTORAL1987. It has been over six months since you last edited the

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note to assure you that I recognise your good faith in trying to find a way to denote a signatory to a treaty who subsequently withdrew from it. It is a very important issue, with widespread implications. For example, what if a signatory withdrew unilaterally? Or signed it and then ignored it anyway? Yes, we need some way to indicate such things but I really believe that it is too important for a

Thanks for messaging me, I will raise this issue with them immediately as we need to find a way forward on this. (MOTORAL1987 (talk) 17:51, 2 February 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Hi @MOTORAL1987:. I have reverted your edits to the Children (Abolition of Defence of Reasonable Punishment) (Wales) Act 2020 and Senedd and Elections (Wales) Act 2020. Acts of the National Assembly for Wales are simply known as Welsh Acts for short and this is the name used on the Infobox UK Legislation template. Llemiles (talk) 20:53, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at the recent history of that template, you will see that I reverted the addition of four bye-elections in 2016 and 2017, because no reason was given and it seemed to me to be just more clutter. You have just added a couple more but not those ones. I'm walking away now but maybe you should either add those four or else add a comment to explain the criteria for inclusion. There is no doubt, for example, that Goldsmith lost the Richmond Park bye-election because of being a hard brexiteer in a strongly remain constituency. --

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited European Communities Act 1972 (Repeal) Bills, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page European Communities Act 1972 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:21, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for that, my mistake entirely it is now fixed (MOTORAL1987 (talk) 21:09, 8 June 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Hi there, I'm

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

Thank you for your attention.

Thanks!!! Good move in putting the side box--Carrasco (talk) 12:42, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you (MOTORAL1987 (talk) 12:45, 29 December 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Hong Kong Act 1985, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:43, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox European Union membership has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 17:13, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2018 Winter Olympics Participating National Olympic Committees has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 15:00, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2019 Cricket World Cup tournament progress has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 14:34, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, just a quick message to say that when moving a page, it can't be done by copying and pasting,

Best wishes

Sorry about that I was wanting to kinda bring the article into line with the Irish article. I don’t know why the UK article has to be classed as a “list” but in light of what you have said I have reverted all changes to before I started making changes, sorry. (MOTORAL1987 (talk) 15:33, 10 March 2022 (UTC))[reply]

No problem. If you want to propose a move I reccommend using

talk) 15:37, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Sports at the 2022 Commonwealth Games, you may be blocked from editing. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:56, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Template:2022 Commonwealth Games calendar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 01:43, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Member states of the European Union sidebar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. DrKay (talk) 20:02, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Retained EU law (UK law). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can add

You can see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page or leave me a message on my talk page. HouseBlaster^talk 22:36, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aftermath of the 2016 United Kingdom European Union membership referendum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lincoln.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:37, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Just a friendly reminder about user page categorization.

I've noticed your user page (linked above) is appearing in regular content categories. See

Usually the situation is remedied by placing a leading colon at the beginning of each category declaration like so:

[[:Category:United Kingdom politics sidebar templates]]

or, by bracketing any category declaration(s) with Template:Draft categories like this:

{{Draft categories|
[[Category:United Kingdom politics sidebar templates]]
}}

Either method will disable the category function. Thank you. Cheers! --DB1729^talk 13:24, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for bringing this to my attention, what is it I might have inadvertently done as specifically to which article or sidebar? (MOTORAL1987 (talk) 17:03, 2 May 2023 (UTC))[reply]

You categorized your user page. See User:MOTORAL1987. Would you prefer that I fix the problem on your behalf? I would be more than happy to take care of it. DB1729^talk 17:13, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah I understand now, yes please feel free to sort this out on my behalf and thank you I was working on a article and I must have forgotten to remove the link in question, have a great evening. (MOTORAL1987 (talk) 17:17, 2 May 2023 (UTC))[reply]

 Done[1]. Have a great rest of your day:) DB1729^talk 17:20, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:1896 Summer Olympics calendar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:18, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:1952 Winter Olympics calendar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:18, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:1960 Winter Olympics calendar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:19, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:1964 Summer Olympics calendar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:19, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:1968 Summer Olympics calendar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:19, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:1972 Summer Olympics calendar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:20, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:1984 Winter Olympics calendar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:20, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:1988 Winter Olympics calendar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:20, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:1992 Summer Olympics calendar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:20, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:1996 Summer Olympics calendar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:20, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:1998 Winter Olympics calendar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:20, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2000 Summer Olympics calendar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:20, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:UKEU2016ResultsNoMaps has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:54, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, MOTORAL1987. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:37, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MOTORAL1987. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:45, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited European Communities Act 1972 (Repeal) Bills, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page European Communities Act 1972.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My apologises I have corrected the mistake and the link now goes to the correct article. (MOTORAL1987 (talk) 06:16, 18 November 2023 (UTC))[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi, you have a request here which I'm currently working on. To be able to get further I need your feedback on some questions I have there, thanks for your support. --always ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 12:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good Evening @User:Crouch, Swale I do apologise I was simply trying to move the Risegate article into “Gosberton Risegate as it had already been created as the villege is officially called “Gosberton Risegate” not “Risegate”. (MOTORAL1987 (talk) 17:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC))[reply]

@MOTORAL1987:, I would like to invite you to Draft:WikiProject food and drink industry in England, if you would like to be a part of the wikiproject please add you name to the list of participants.ChefBear01 (talk) 08:55, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]