User talk:NiciVampireHeart/Archive 21

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Archive 15 ← Archive 19 Archive 20 Archive 21 Archive 22 Archive 23 → Archive 25

HUSTLE

Hi, Nikki. I need your help. Somebody asked in the project about a photo of Giant Silva. I man in flickr have photos and he want that we use them. Can you help me with the photos? I don't know the wrestlers that appear, except giant silva. http://www.flickr.com/photos/arq199/collections/72157617628147771/ Thanks --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 14:29, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi. Thanks for your help. Andrew give me more photos and said me this Thanks for putting my photos on Wikipedia, you did a great job of picking the good ones. I'm especially proud that my photo is being used for Razor Ramon HG's article. I met him and he was a great guy

The photos for Kazushige_Nosawa were actually of Banzai Chie, but someone has already edited them

I've found some photos I took last May at Hustle when I was taking photos for the Rene Dupree official fanclub. There's some good photos in there (including some spanking :), I hope you can use these too.

www.flickr.com/photos/arq199/sets/72157618891607346/ www.flickr.com/photos/arq199/sets/72157617628245337/

Keep in touch and I'll mail you if I take photos at Hustle in the future

Regards

Andrew

Can you upload some of them? this week i'm very busy. Thanks --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 16:00, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

We have a lot of photos. Can you upload the first almub? I will upload the second one.--HHH Pedrigree (talk) 12:51, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 July 2010

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 17:38, 19 July 2010 (UTC) by
talk
)

DYK for ROH The Big Bang!

— Rlevse • Talk • 18:02, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Money in the Bank records

You are asking for sources when as mentioned before the sources are WWE.com AND the Wikipedia page. However, if you feel the need to ask for sources, why do you not require the same of the official times used on the PPV match information. Also, why are the records not required on the Royal Rumble? Only some of the records have sources, yet miraculously, all are allowed. It's like we're somehow requiring one set of rules for one page and another set of rules for another. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.13.51.114 (talk) 23:15, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Early life section

Okay.If it's a pointless splitting of a section why is Randy Orton's page like this?Personal life and early life are two separate things in my opinion.Things need to be put in proper places.(MgTurtle (talk) 02:39, 25 July 2010 (UTC))

  1. I have no idea what an "Earl life section" is.
  2. Assuming you mean "Early life", give me a valid reason that doesn't include "in my opinion" why the sections should be split. A policy would be good, but I don't believe there is one. Your personal opinion is not policy and as such does not have to dictate how articles look.
  3. Explain how precisely "early" and "personal" lives differ please. Again, a reference to some sort of official policy here were be good, but again, I don't recall ever seeing one.
  4. Why are you intentionally leaving out part of my edit summary? I said "pointless splitting of short section" in both my edit summaries. [1] [2]
  5. In Orton's article, the early and personal life sections are both longer than 4 sentences and take up more than a line and a half, unlike Mark Henry's. What precisely is the point of having a section that a line and a half when it fits in another section and falls under the scope of another section?
  6. Your edit to Mark Henry also caused massive sideways elongation of the page. [3]
  7. Similarly with Matt Hardy - why separate out a short section when the result is two even smaller sections that both encompass the same type of information?
  8. Again with Matt Hardy did not look to see how you edit affected the article. In this case, it screwed up the images of the "In wrestling" section. Unhelpful. [4]
  9. It's only the "proper place" by your definition of the term. Please don't try to impose your will on me, it's really quite aggravating.
  10. Is there a reson you didn't put spaces between your sentences in your above comment? It's quite hard to read like that.
♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 03:53, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Okay.You turned a discussion into an attack on how I type things.It's just how I typed it and you shouldn't focus on that. It's not hard to read. Mark Henry's page is one thing but Hardy's is another. Instead of this pointless list of items, why not help get a policy started so this doesn't happen. But to answer some of your questions, personal life involves spouses, children, and friends. Such as who people have dated and children and interests outside of their careers.Early life includes parents, siblings, high school careers, and how they got started in sports.I don't see why it's so hard to understand this. Also, this keeps the page in chronological order like an encyclopedia should be. I didn't try and impose any will on you. I meant that the info should be in chronological order. Also the images could have been fixed. Hardy's info is longer than four sentences each so I don't understand what is meant by that. I realized that the Mark Henry information should be together because both sections are short anyway. A policy would be very helpful for everyone. Please keep things about the pages and not about editors. That would also be helpful.(MgTurtle (talk) 14:04, 25 July 2010 (UTC))

  1. "Pointless list of items"? I was reponding to your initial post. I formatted my response like that so it would be easy to follow.
  2. It is not my job to write policy - it's up to the community to write a policy. I like to focus my editing on articles, not pointless arguing over whether something should be a policy or not. Besides, I was asking you to provide a policy to back up your edits. You have not done so.
  3. But why split it? Especially if you're going to have two very shot sections that barely qualify as paragraphs? It's not logical.
  4. "chronological order like an encyclopedia should be". According to whom? I've always believed that encyclopedia articles should be laid out logically, and that doesn't always mean chronologically. Again though, if you can provide a policy to back yourself, I'll happily obey it.
  5. I fail to see how a question about how you formatted your comment means that I did not "keep things about the pages".
  6. Asking a question is not an attack. I asked why you left out spaces. Where is the attack? Please read
    WP:ATTACK
    again before throwing out any more accusations.
  7. And actually, it's a lot harder to read for me than your second comment, in which you spaced your sentences. I consider it common courtesy to make comments as legible as possible for others, and that includes spacing sentences properly in my view.
  8. Finally, if you going to throw around false accusations of attacks, kindly refrain from posting to my talk page any further.
♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 05:14, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
For some reason, MgTurtle also did the same thing to
Booker T's page. She keeps adding an Early Life section where it is not needed. Can you follow up with your fellow Wikipedians to perhaps moderate her editing abilities since there are several pages apparently where she keeps doing this. It is annoying, and it is WRONG. Thanks 71.176.58.237 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 05:01, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
.
Hmmm, four sentences and two lines on
WP:ANEW if it continues. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 05:14, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

After looking over some other pages and section, I've realized that I became Obsessed with the wrong thing. The whole problem was with the Matt Hardy page because I did the same thing to Jeff Hardy's page. Now granted Jeff has more information than Matt but I did not understand why it (Jeff's page) was left alone and not Matt's. This was the only page I was considering because I didn't even see Henry's page till later. I probably also took your questions out of context. Sorry about that. And I said why not help get a policy started, not creating one yourself. Also the closest article I've seen about chronological order is WP:Linking but I'm not sure that even goes with this. I thought that there was something about putting life events in chronological order but I guess I was mistaken. It still makes sense to me to put things like that but I guess sometimes you can't. Also using the word pointless, seems out of place here because there is a point but just not backed by a policy. Oh well, I guess that's all.(MgTurtle (talk) 11:52, 26 July 2010 (UTC))

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 July 2010

Wrestling newsletter

The Wrestling newsletter is still sent to several users that are not on your subscription lists. For example User_talk:Self_Preteder get a delivery 20 June 2010. Are able to stop the "spamming" of several inactive users? --Kslotte (talk) 21:27, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

FYI, there's no such thing as a "subscription list" for the WP:PW newsletter - it's sent to anyone who is in Category:WikiProject Professional wrestling participants. In any case, yes, Self Preteder (talk · contribs) and several other inactive participants have been added to the "no spam" list and will no longer be receiving the newsletter. I hope this fixes your concerns. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 04:50, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
There are still unactive user that receive the newsletter, for example this on 4 July. Configure it in such a way that only confirmed active users receive it. Currently inactive user talk pages are spammed. --Kslotte (talk) 22:37, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
This user also received the newsletter at 19 July 2010. Please, stop spamming the newsletters to users that aren't longer active. --Kslotte (talk) 15:36, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

WikiCup 2010 July newsletter

We are half-way through our penultimate round, and nothing is yet certain. Pool A, currently led by

WikiCup talk page
.

Planning has begun for the 2011 WikiCup, with open discussions concerning scoring and flags for next year's competition. Contributions to those discussions would be appreciated, especially concerning the flags, as next year's signups cannot begin until the flag issue has been resolved. Signups will hopefully open at some point in this round, with discussion about possible changing in the scoring/process opening some time afterwards.

Earlier this round, we said goodbye to

Fox and The ed17 22:44, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for WWE Elimination Chamber