User talk:Rushtheeditor

Please don't template me! Everybody makes mistakes, and this user finds user warning templates impersonal and disrespectful. If there's something you'd like to say, please take a moment to write a comment below in your own words.

Hi Rushtheeditor! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! TheImaCow (talk) 18:05, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:00, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your recent edit appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 00:13, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Liza Koshy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lamar High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Good Morning Canada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CTV News Channel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:19, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Canadian Radio Music Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New City (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited VidCon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Charles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you change the title of the article at

Did it change names in the UK? IMDb and RT will default titles to the US release title no matter what, but that is not the convention we typically follow on Wikipedia. BOVINEBOY2008 18:08, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am sure it did but it is up to you to check.

No it's up to YOU to provide a

reliable source that the name was changed in the UK; RT and IMDb are not reliable sources for names changes in the UK. And even IMDb indicates that it is titled Romans in the UK. Sundayclose (talk) 18:18, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

This is your only warning; if you move a page disruptively again, as you did at Romans (2017 film), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sundayclose (talk) 18:07, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Manu Feildel, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 00:18, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 9th Canadian Screen Awards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/9th Canadian Screen Awards until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 23:35, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Rithvik Dhanjani, you may be blocked from editing. Diffs: [2] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:40, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Chill-out music. Sundayclose (talk) 18:01, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 9th Canadian Screen Awards. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 09:17, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

Article REDIRECT to Lilly Singh#A Little Late with Lilly Singh, Sketchy Times with Lilly Singh and other ventures (2019–present)

Reason: Content already in the main article. Please note: "Wikipedia's licensing requires that attribution be given to all users involved in creating and altering the content of a page". See Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. If redirect is disputed please post discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion

  // Timothy :: talk  07:30, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Simmi Singh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Simmi Singh, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 21:14, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rushtheeditor! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 21:14, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

Referencing for beginners

. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails

WP:ANYBIO

- YouTube is not an acceptable or reliable source/reference.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Simmi Singh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Simmi Singh, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 07:25, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at TheOdd1sOut. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 17:42, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Salimfadhley was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Dvwn
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  Draft:Dvwn, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Salimfadhley (talk) 10:05, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Ionmars10. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on TheOdd1sOut, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Ionmars10 (talk) 17:31, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The senator from California is resigning her seat at 12pm EST. Please don't jump the proverbial gun. Sdrqaz (talk) 16:32, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Greta Thunberg. Sundayclose (talk) 02:21, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have received numerous warnings for disruptive editing, but you obviously are not taking the warnings seriously. You could be blocked immediately. And you will be blocked if you make one more unsourced edit. If there's something about Wikipedia's requirements for sourcing that you don't understand ask right here, right now. Otherwise you will blocked after your next unsourced or disruptive edit. This has gone on long enough. Sundayclose (talk) 02:25, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

KOZ Entertainment is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KOZ Entertainment until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Robert McClenon (talk) 07:52, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

]

Your draft article,

Draft:Dvwn

Hello, Rushtheeditor. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Dvwn

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

request its undeletion

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:55, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, Rushtheeditor. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:01, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just a heads up that I reverted your edits over at deputy minister (Canada). Deputy premiers and the deputy prime minister is not the same thing as a deputy minister. The article is about the civil service position that is responsible for the non-political operations of departments. A more appropriate article for your additions is: deputy premier (Canada). —WildComet ^talk 05:24, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Got Talent, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Badshah.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good work on Bids_for_the_2026_Commonwealth_Games. Here's some tea so you can keep up the good work! CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 05:47, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you !! Rushtheeditor (talk) 17:54, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rushtheeditor

Thank you for creating 2022 Canadian federal budget.

Good start!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:08, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you ! Rushtheeditor (talk) 21:21, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rushtheeditor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

This account is not directly blocked. If you are unable to edit, please exactly follow the instructions that appear when you attempt to do so. Yamla (talk) 13:27, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, I'm Meters. I noticed that you recently removed content from Iqaluit without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The City's web site lists Bell as Mayor. Why are you removing him? Meters (talk) 19:51, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see that his resignation has just been announced. I'll add it with a source. Please don't make unsourced changes such as that. Meters (talk) 20:03, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies! I thought it was added, turns out I didn't look closely enough. Rushtheeditor (talk) 20:08, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No biggie. Quickly fixed. Meters (talk) 20:11, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Legislative Assembly of Alberta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brooks.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

On 17 December 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Jim Carr, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 04:55, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy. There's been no consensus (yet) to have the term dates changed from January 3, 2023 to January 7, 2023. Note: January 3 is used for all the Congresses post-20th amendment, even though they didn't all officially convene on January 3. GoodDay (talk) 07:24, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 30 January 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Hazel McCallion, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 23:42, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Jama, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

-- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 04:42, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 28 April 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Tarek Fatah, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. El_C 07:02, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 2 May 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Parkash Singh Badal, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 04:06, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 12 May 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Marc Lalonde, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 11:07, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 24 May 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Kacper Tekieli, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 08:52, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

23rd IIFA Awards, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 23:22, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. You had marked the ITN nomination for Sarokin as "ready". However, there was no consensus for posting yet, so I removed it. Regards. —Bagumba (talk) 09:03, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You added Hindutva in the ideology section of Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance saying SS (UBT) has it. UBT hindutva is defined as secular hindutva by Uddhav Thackeray himself.^[1] Shaan Sengupta^Talk 17:13, 19 July 2023 (UTC) Shaan Sengupta^Talk 17:13, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And that is a big tent Alliance. Things in ideology can only be mentioned if it is common in multiple parties. Otherwise the Infobox will get too long. Hope you geeting my point.@Rushtheeditor Shaan Sengupta^Talk 17:15, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

understood. Rushtheeditor (talk) 17:25, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm guessing your creation of Andrea Hazell as a redirect to Mitzie Hunter was a big oops! :) https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Andrea_Hazell&oldid=1167485105 Nfitz (talk) 02:45, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was. Brain fart on my part. Rushtheeditor (talk) 02:59, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Disqualification of Rahul Gandhi did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a

 → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks!

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

On 14 December 2023,

[OMT] 02:28, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

ITN recognition for Ed Broadbent

On 14 January 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ed Broadbent, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 01:21, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Rushtheeditor. Thank you for your work on

page curation process

, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:02, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dahua Technology

Hi Rushtheeditor, I have some suggested updates for the Dahua Technology article regarding the company's involvement in various sports competitions. I noticed you show interest in editing articles related to athletic events and games, and thought you may be interested in reviewing my edit request on the Dahua Technology Talk page. I'd appreciate your input and assistance with the edits. Thank you, Caitlyn23 (talk) 22:15, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]