Wikipedia:Merge what?
This is an essay on the deletion policy. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
This page in a nutshell: Don't vote to merge at an AfD discussion just to go for a middle ground . Make sure there's notable content that can be merged. |
It is common in
Before nominating
Articles do not need to go through
Voting merge at AfD
Unlike other deletion processes a merge close does not result in an immediate effect to the article. Someone still has to complete the merge. You should try to make the process as easy as possible for them. The difficulty associated with conducting merges varies. Adding the information to a list or creating a dedicated section from the article is relatively simple. Merging two articles that both cover the same topic can be difficult and time consuming. Is the effort of doing the merge going to result in an improved article?
Always provide a link to the target article, and make sure the link is correct. On occasion, articles for deletion discussion have closed as a mistaken consensus to link to a disambiguation page, because the first editor didn't check and provided the wrong link and no one else bothered to check either. It is not always best to target the parent article as this can often create
When a discussion is closed as merge it has an impact on other articles. Think about how the merge will effect the target article, especially if it is a well developed one. If an article consists of a large number of tables and stats it is unlikely to fit very well in an overview article.[4] Articles with serious problems (non-neutral, poorly sourced, poorly written etc.) are not seldom solved by merged. In some cases it can end up making the target article significantly worse.[5]
Ideally, the exact content to be merged and the precise target location will be specified.
If you believe the material should be retained in some way but you're not sure how, consider voting to keep and initiating or participating in a merger proposal on the article's talk page. If you've considered the issue and decided that no content needs to be merged, but you also think the AfD article's title is a plausible search term, !vote to redirect. If a subject doesn't meet the usual criteria for merging, it probably shouldn't be merged as a result of AfD either.
Closing merge discussions
The following is not intended to replace the closers discretion when closing discussions. They are just points to contemplate that may make a merge easier for other editors to complete.
Straight keep and delete !vote are generally given less weight than well rationed !vote. Merges should be treated the same way (see
If closing a long discussion as merge it can be helpful to summarise the consensus for how the merge should proceed. Especially if there are varying ideas on the target or information to be merged.
Completing a merge
Once a discussion is closed as merge then this needs to be carried out. The process is similar to
If you haven't already, read the AFD as it may contain details on what should be merged. Where possible these details should be followed. If there is no specific instructions on what to merge then it is up to the person conducting the merge on what to merge. Take care merging unsourced content and poorly sourced controversial content. Look at the target article and determine where it might fit. Sometimes the information is already there and can be expanded upon or a new section might need to be created. If the target article is well developed be extra careful when merging, especially if it is a good or featured article. Be careful of violating
When merging you must say it is a merge and link back to the merged article. This step is
Notes
- ^ Agnes Skinner was merged to List of recurring The Simpsons characters. While consensus was against her having her own article, a deletion discussion wasn't necessary.
- ^ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gilbrea Centre for Studies in Aging closed as merge to McMaster University, but the information fitted much better in McMaster Faculty of Social Sciences.
- ^ The AfD for Ron Burgundy was closed as a merge with Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy#Plot. But as one of the merge voters put it, Ron Burgundy was "completely redundant" to that section. Four months later, it was redirected without merging.
- ^ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brussels Tigers was one of a group of similar articles that predominately consisted of lists that were closed as merge into a single overview article
- ^ Child work, money trail and anti-blackness in the U.S. were essay-like articles that would be difficult to merge into the target articles without reducing their quality.
- ^ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chapel Hill State School is a good example of a debate that clearly stated what should be merged