Antihumanism
Part of a series on |
Humanism |
---|
Philosophy portal |
In social theory and philosophy, antihumanism or anti-humanism is a theory that is critical of traditional humanism, traditional ideas about humanity and the human condition.[1] Central to antihumanism is the view that philosophical anthropology[2] and its concepts of "human nature", "man" or "humanity" should be rejected as historically relative, ideological or metaphysical.[3]
Origins
In the late 18th and 19th centuries, the philosophy of
Criticism of humanism as over-idealistic began in the 19th century. For Friedrich Nietzsche, humanism was nothing more than an empty figure of speech[6] – a secular version of theism. Max Stirner expressed a similar position in his book The Ego and Its Own, published several decades before Nietzsche's work. Nietzsche argues in Genealogy of Morals that human rights exist as a means for the weak to constrain the strong; as such, they do not facilitate the emancipation of life, but instead deny it.[7]
The young Karl Marx is sometimes considered a humanist, as he rejected the idea of human rights as a symptom of the very dehumanization they were intended to oppose. Given that capitalism forces individuals to behave in an egoistic manner, they are in constant conflict with one another, and are thus in need of rights to protect themselves. True emancipation, he asserted, could only come through the establishment of communism, which abolishes private property.[8] According to many anti-humanists, such as Louis Althusser, mature Marx sees the idea of "humanity" as an unreal abstraction that masks conflicts between antagonistic classes; since human rights are abstract, the justice and equality they protect is also abstract, permitting extreme inequalities in reality.[9]
In the 20th century, the view of humans as rationally autonomous was challenged by Sigmund Freud, who believed humans to be largely driven by unconscious irrational desires.[10]
Positivism and scientism
Humanist thinker
"
totalitarian regimes."[19]
A similar criticism can be found in the work associated with the Frankfurt School of social research. Antipositivism would be further facilitated by rejections of scientism; or science as ideology. Jürgen Habermas argues, in his On the Logic of the Social Sciences (1967), that
"the positivist thesis of unified science, which assimilates all the sciences to a natural-scientific model, fails because of the intimate relationship between the social sciences and history, and the fact that they are based on a situation-specific understanding of meaning that can be explicated only hermeneutically ... access to a symbolically prestructured reality cannot be gained by observation alone."[20]
Structuralism
Saussure held that individual units of linguistic signification - signs - only enjoy their individuality and their power to signify by virtue of their contrasts or oppositions with other units in the same symbolic system. For Saussure, the sign is a mysterious unification of a sound and a thought. Nothing links the two: each sound and thought is in principle exchangeable for other sounds or concepts. A sign is only significant as a result of the total system in which it functions.[24] To communicate by particular forms of speech and action (parole) is itself to presuppose a general body of rules (langue). The concrete piece of behaviour and the system that enables it to mean something mutually entail each other. The very act of identifying what they say already implies structures. Signs are thus not at the service of a subject; they do not pre-exist the relations of difference between them. We cannot seek an exit from this purely relational system. The individual is always subordinate to the code. Linguistic study must abstract from the subjective physical, physiological and psychological aspects of language to concentrate on langue as a self-contained whole.[25]
The structuralist
The semiological work of Roland Barthes (1977) decried the cult of the author and indeed proclaimed his death.
Taking a lead from
Althusser considered "structure" and "social relations" to have primacy over individual
Post-structuralism
Post-structuralist Jacques Derrida continued structuralism's focus on language as key to understanding all aspects of individual and social being, as well as its problematization of the human subject, but rejected its commitment to scientific objectivity.[38] Derrida argued that if signs of language are only significant by virtue of their relations of difference with all other signs in the same system, then meaning is based purely on the play of differences, and is never truly present.[38] He claimed that the fundamentally ambiguous nature of language makes human intention unknowable, attacked Enlightenment perfectionism, and condemned as futile the existentialist quest for authenticity in the face of the all-embracing network of signs. The world itself is text; a reference to a pure meaning prior to language cannot be expressed in it.[38] As he stressed, "the subject is not some meta-linguistic substance or identity, some pure cogito of self-presence; it is always inscribed in language".[39]
Michel Foucault challenged the foundational aspects of Enlightenment humanism.[40] He rejected absolute categories of epistemology (truth or certainty) and philosophical anthropology (the subject, influence, tradition, class consciousness), in a manner not unlike Nietzsche's earlier dismissal of the categories of reason, morality, spirit, ego, motivation as philosophical substitutes for God.[41] Foucault argued that modern values either produced counter-emancipatory results directly, or matched increased "freedom" with increased and disciplinary normatization.[42] His anti-humanist skepticism extended to attempts to ground theory in human feeling, as much as in human reason, maintaining that both were historically contingent constructs, rather than the universals humanism maintained.[43] In The Archaeology of Knowledge, Foucault dismissed history as "humanist anthropology". The methodology of his work focused not on the reality that lies behind the categories of "insanity", "criminality", "delinquency" and "sexuality", but on how these ideas were constructed by discourses.[44]
Cultural examples
The heroine of the novel Nice Work begins by defining herself as a semiotic materialist, "a subject position in an infinite web of discourses – the discourses of power, sex, family, science, religion, poetry, etc."[45] Charged with taking a bleak deterministic view, she retorts, "antihumanist, yes; inhuman, no...the truly determined subject is he who is not aware of the discursive formations that determine him".[46] However, with greater life-experience, she comes closer to accepting that post-structuralism is an intriguing philosophical game, but probably meaningless to those who have not yet even gained awareness of humanism itself.[47]
In his critique of humanist approaches to popular film, Timothy Laurie suggests that in new animated films from DreamWorks and Pixar "the 'human' is now able to become a site of amoral disturbance, rather than – or at least, in addition to – being a model of exemplary behaviour for junior audiences".[48]
See also
- Anti-foundationalism
- Anti-materialism
- Anti-natalism
- Christian perfection, position in Christianity whose opponents claim entails humans losing their sin
- Cosmicism
- Essentialism and Non-essentialism
- Stanley Fish
- Nancy Fraser
- Hard determinism
- Humanism
- Marx's theory of human nature
- Marxist humanism
- Modernism and Postmodernism
- New Historicism
- Nihilism
- Occamism, which denies universals, instead affirming that only individuals exist
- Original sin
- Philosophical pessimism
- Posthumanism
- Object-oriented ontology, which rejects anthropocentrism
- Social alienation
- Structural Marxism
References
- ^ J. Childers/G. Hentzi eds., The Columbia Dictionary of Modern Literary and Cultural Criticism (1995) p. 140-1
- ^ ISBN 0-09-162-931-4.
- ^ Childers, p. 100
- ISBN 0-09-162-931-4.
- ^ Childers, p. 95-6
- ^ Tony Davies, Humanism (1997) p. 37
- ^ "Chapter III §14". On the Genealogy of Morality.
- ^ G. Gutting ed., The Cambridge Companion to Foucault (2003) p. 243
- ^ G. Gutting ed., The Cambridge Companion to Foucault (2003) p. 244
- ^ Peter Gay, Freud (1989) p. 449
- ISBN 0-09-162-931-4.
- ISBN 0-09-162-931-4.
- ^ a b John J. Macionis, Linda M. Gerber, "Sociology", Seventh Canadian Edition, Pearson Canada
- ^ Jorge Larrain (1979) The Concept of Ideology p.197, quotation:
one of the features of positivism is precisely its postulate that scientific knowledge is the paradigm of valid knowledge, a postulate that indeed is never proved nor intended to be proved.
- S2CID 143761151..
- ^ Sociology Guide. "Auguste Comte". Sociology Guide.
- ISBN 978-0-205-11671-3.
- ^ Tzvetan Todorov. The Imperfect Garden. Princeton University Press. 2001. Pg. 20
- ^ Tzvetan Todorov. The Imperfect Garden. Princeton University Press. 2001. Pg. 23
- ISBN 978-0-7456-4328-1p.22
- ^ Elisabeth Roudinesco, Jacques Lacan (2005) p. 332
- ^ R. Appignanesi/C. Garratt, Postmodernism for Beginners (1995) p. 56–60
- ISBN 0-09-162-931-4.
- ISBN 0-09-162-931-4.
- ISBN 0-09-162-931-4.
- Levi-Strauss, Claude(1966). The Savage Mind. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson. p. 247.
- ^ Appiganesi, p. 66-7
- ^ Jacques Lacan, Écrits: A Selection (1997) p. 216 and p. 264
- ISBN 0-09-162-931-4.
- ISBN 0-09-162-931-4.
- ISBN 0-09-162-931-4.
- ^ M. Hardt/K. Weeks eds., The Jameson Reader (2005) p. 150
- Project MUSE 24419.
- ^ ISBN 0-09-162-931-4.
- ISBN 0-09-162-931-4.
- ^ Simon Choat, Marx through Post-Structuralism (2010) p. 17
- ISBN 0-09-162-931-4.
- ^ ISBN 0-09-162-931-4.
- ^ Quoted in John D. Caputo, The Tears and Prayers of Jacques Derrida (1997) p. 349
- ^ G. Gutting ed., The Cambridge Companion to Foucault (2003) p. 277
- ISBN 0-09-162-931-4.
- ^ Gutting, p. 277
- ^ "Foucault and critique: Kant, humanism and the human sciences". University of Surrey. September 13, 2017. Retrieved January 16, 2018.
- ISBN 0-09-162-931-4.
- ^ David Lodge, Nice Work (1988) p. 21-2
- ^ Lodge, p. 22
- ^ Lodge, p. 153 and p. 225
- ISBN 978-1-349-49775-1.
Further reading
- Roland Barthes, Image: Music: Text (1977)
- L.S. Cattarini, Beyond Sartre and Sterility (2018) includes essay against humanism
- Michel Foucault, Madness and Civilisation (1961)
- Michel Foucault, Birth of the Clinic (1963)
- Michel Foucault, The Order of Things (1966)
- Michel Foucault, The Archaeology of Knowledge (1969)
- Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punish (1975)
- Michel Foucault, The History of Sexuality (1976)
- Stefanos Geroulanos, An Atheism That Is Not Humanist Emerges in French Thought (2010)
- Martin Heidegger, "Letter on Humanism" (1947) reprinted in Basic Writings
- Karl Marx, "On the Jewish Question" (1843) reprinted in Early Writings
- Friedrich Nietzsche, On the Genealogy of Morals (1887)