Duncan-class battleship
![]() HMS Albemarle
| |
Class overview | |
---|---|
Name | Duncan class |
Builders |
|
Operators | ![]() |
Preceded by | London class |
Succeeded by | King Edward VII class |
Built | 1900–1903 |
In commission | 1903–1917 |
Completed | 6 |
Lost | 3 |
Retired | 3 |
General characteristics | |
Type | Pre-dreadnought battleship |
Displacement |
|
Length | 432 ft (132 m) |
Beam | 75 ft 6 in (23.01 m) |
Draught | 25 ft 9 in (7.85 m) |
Installed power |
|
Propulsion |
|
Speed | 19 knots (35 km/h; 22 mph) |
Range | 6,070 nmi (11,240 km; 6,990 mi) at 10 knots (19 km/h; 12 mph) |
Complement | 720 |
Armament |
|
Armour |
|
The Duncan class was a
All members of the class served in the
Cornwallis participated in the
Design

The six ships of the Duncan class were ordered in response to Russian
To achieve the desired speed of 19 knots while keeping
Minor revisions to the dimensions were made between June and September, when the finalised design was approved, with tenders for shipyard contracts being sent out the following month. Public pressure over the 1898 programme—the first three Londons that were supposedly slower than the Peresvets—led to the passage of a Special Supplementary Programme that allocated funding for the first four Duncans, all of which were laid down in 1899. Two more were added under the 1899 programme.[3]
General characteristics and machinery

The Duncan-class ships were 432 feet (132 m)
Their crew numbered 720 officers and
The Duncan-class ships were powered by a pair of 4-cylinder
Armament

The Duncans had four 12-inch 40-calibre guns mounted in twin-gun turrets fore and aft. These were the same guns and mountings carried aboard the Formidable and London classes, although their barbettes were reduced in diameter as a weight-saving measure. To account for the slightly narrower barbettes, the gun houses also had to be reduced in size, though the guns were carried in the same BVI-type mountings.[8] The mounts had a range of elevation from -5 degrees to of 13.5 degrees, and required the guns to return to 4.5 degrees to be loaded. The guns had a muzzle velocity of 2,562 to 2,573 feet per second (781 to 784 m/s), and they were capable of penetrating 12 inches of Krupp armour at a range of 4,800 yards (4,400 m). At their maximum elevation, the guns had a range of 15,300 yards (14,000 m).[9]
The ships also mounted a
In 1915, the five surviving ships received two 3-inch (76 mm)
Armour
The Duncan class adopted the basic armour layout of the Formidable class, but with significant revision to the forward armour scheme and with significantly thinner levels of protection. Earlier battleship designs had employed a partial armoured belt that terminated abreast of both of the main battery turrets; the ends of the belt were connected by way of transverse bulkheads to create a central citadel that protected the ships' magazines and propulsion machinery spaces. This arrangement left the bow and stern unprotected, and thus highly vulnerable to enemy fire. White was concerned that the unprotected bow could be flooded by even light gunfire, which would reduce speed and maneuverability. Since the Duncans were intended to serve as fast battleships, White decided to reduce the risk of this kind of damage by discarding the forward transverse bulkhead in favor of a complete belt. The main portion of the belt was 7 inches (178 mm) thick and extended to just forward of the fore turret, thereafter being gradually reduced to 5 in (127 mm), then 4 in (102 mm), then to 3 in (76 mm), and finally to 2 in (51 mm) close to the stem. The aft end of the ship retained the traditional transverse bulkhead, which was also 7 in thick. Abaft of the bulkhead, the hull was protected by a strake of 1-inch (25 mm) thick side armour.[13]
Horizontal protection consisted of a pair of armoured decks that covered the ships' vitals. The main deck ran from the stem to the aft bulkhead and was connected to the top of the belt; it was 1 to 2 in thick, with the thicker armour over the central portion of the ship and the thinner steel over the bow. The second deck, at middle deck level, was 1 in thick and covered just the central citadel, sloping down on the sides to the belt. The voids created between the decks and behind the belt were used to store coal, which had the added benefit of increasing the strength of the side protection layout. The bow and stern had a curved armour deck below the waterline that extended from the barbettes to either end of the hull, which was 1 to 2 in thick. The ships' main battery turrets faces and sides were 8 in (203 mm) thick, with 10 in (254 mm) rears and 2–3 in roofs. The turrets sat atop barbettes that were 11 in (279 mm) on the outer face above the belt and 7 in thick behind the belt; their inner faces were reduced to 10 and 4 inches thick, respectively. The casemate battery was protected with 6 in (152 mm) of armour plate, and their ammunition hoists received 2 in of armour protection. The ships' forward conning towers had 10–12 in sides and their aft conning towers had 3 in sides.[14]
Ships

Name | Builder[4] | Laid down[4]
|
Launched[4] | Completed[4] |
---|---|---|---|---|
Albemarle | Chatham Dockyard | 8 January 1900 | 5 March 1901 | November 1903 |
Cornwallis | Thames Ironworks and Shipbuilding Company | 19 July 1899 | 13 July 1901 | February 1904 |
Duncan | Thames Ironworks and Shipbuilding Company | 10 July 1899 | 21 March 1901 | October 1903 |
Exmouth | Laird Brothers
|
10 August 1899 | 31 August 1901 | May 1903 |
Montagu | Devonport Dockyard | 23 November 1899 | 5 March 1901 | October 1903 |
Russell | Palmers Shipbuilding and Iron Company | 11 March 1899 | 19 February 1901 | February 1903 |
Service history

From their commissioning in 1903–1904, all six ships served with the

With the onset of hostilities, Admiral John Jellicoe, the commander of the Grand Fleet, requested that the 6th Squadron ships be sent to strengthen the main British fleet in accordance with pre-war plans. The five Duncans were used to reinforce the cruisers on the Northern Patrol, maintaining the distant blockade of Germany. While serving with the Grand Fleet, the ships were assigned to the 3rd Battle Squadron[17][18][19] On 2 November, they were transferred to the Channel Fleet owing to increased German naval activity in the southern North Sea; there, they reconstituted the 6th Squadron on 14 November. Russell and Exmouth bombarded German-occupied Zeebrugge, which was being used as an advance naval base for U-boats, in late November, though they inflicted little damage and the Germans quickly resumed operations there.[20] The ships were used to guard the southern British coast against German attacks through the end of the year, and in the first half of 1915, the 6th Squadron was gradually dispersed.[15]
Cornwallis was the first to leave, in January 1915, when she was sent to join the
Albemarle remained with the Grand Fleet through January 1916, when she was assigned as a
Notes
- ^ Burt, p. 227.
- ^ Burt, pp. 227–229.
- ^ Burt, pp. 227–228.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Lyon & Roberts, p. 37.
- ^ a b Burt, p. 236.
- ^ Burt, pp. 232–233.
- ^ Burt, p. 232.
- ^ Burt, pp. 229, 231.
- ^ Friedman, pp. 57–58.
- ^ Burt, pp. 231, 233.
- ^ Friedman, pp. 79–81.
- ^ Burt, p. 242.
- ^ Burt, pp. 234–235.
- ^ Burt, pp. 235–236.
- ^ a b c Burt, pp. 242–247.
- ^ "The Tercentenary Celebrations", p. 445.
- ^ Burt, p. 245.
- ^ Corbett 1920, pp. 39–40, 75, 214, 254.
- ^ Jellicoe, p. 93.
- ^ Corbett 1921, pp. 9–10, 12–13, 19.
- ^ Corbett 1921, pp. 144–377.
- ^ a b c Burt, pp. 243–247.
- ^ Preston, p. 9.
- ^ Corbett 1923, pp. 24, 37, 248–252, 260.
- ^ Burt, p. 246.
- ^ Preston, p. 383.
References
- Burt, R. A. (2013) [1988]. British Battleships 1889–1904. Barnsley: Seaforth Publishing. ISBN 978-1-84832-173-1.
- OCLC 174823980.
- Corbett, Julian Stafford (1921). Naval Operations: From The Battle of the Falklands to the Entry of Italy Into the War in May 1915. Vol. II. London: Longmans, Green & Co. OCLC 924170059.
- Corbett, Julian Stafford (1923). Naval Operations: The Dardanelles Campaign. Vol. III. London: Longmans, Green & Co. OCLC 174824081.
- Friedman, Norman (2011). Naval Weapons of World War One: Guns, Torpedoes, Mines and ASW Weapons of All Nations; An Illustrated Directory. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 978-1-84832-100-7.
- OCLC 162593478.
- Lyon, David & Roberts, John (1979). "Great Britain and Empire Forces". In Chesneau, Roger & Kolesnik, Eugene M. (eds.). Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1860–1905. Greenwich: Conway Maritime Press. pp. 1–113. ISBN 978-0-85177-133-5.
- Preston, Antony (1985). "Great Britain and Empire Forces". In Gardiner, Robert & Gray, Randal (eds.). Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1906–1921. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press. pp. 1–104. ISBN 978-0-87021-907-8.
- "The Tercentenary Celebrations". The Canada Gazette. London: Charles Hunt: 445. 1908. OCLC 47522100.
Further reading
- ISBN 978-1-86176-281-8.
- Dittmar, F. J. & Colledge, J. J. (1972). British Warships 1914–1919. London: Ian Allan. ISBN 978-0-7110-0380-4.
- Gibbons, Tony (1983). The Complete Encyclopedia of Battleships and Battlecruisers: A Technical Directory of All the World's Capital Ships From 1860 to the Present Day. London: Salamander Books Ltd. ISBN 978-0-86101-142-1.
- Parkes, Oscar (1990) [1957]. British Battleships. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 978-1-55750-075-5.
- Pears, Randolph (1979). British Battleships 1892–1957: The Great Days of the Fleets. London: G. Cave Associates. ISBN 978-0-906223-14-7.