Wikipedia:Requests for page protection: Difference between revisions

Page semi-protected
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Content deleted Content added
→‎Rham!: Declined – not enough recent disruptive activity (using responseHelper)
→‎Tomorrow X Together: Semi-protected 2 weeks (using responseHelper)
Line 79: Line 79:


'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Persistent [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]] – IP users persistently adding EPs to the discography section even though there is a hidden comment that says only to add studio albums. [[User:EN-Jungwon|<span style="font-family:Brush Script MT"><span style="color:red">EN</span></span>]]-'''''[[User talk:EN-Jungwon|<span style="color:silver">Jungwon</span>]]''''' 06:34, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Persistent [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]] – IP users persistently adding EPs to the discography section even though there is a hidden comment that says only to add studio albums. [[User:EN-Jungwon|<span style="font-family:Brush Script MT"><span style="color:red">EN</span></span>]]-'''''[[User talk:EN-Jungwon|<span style="color:silver">Jungwon</span>]]''''' 06:34, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|s|2 weeks}} [[User:Panyd|Panyd]]<sup>[[User talk:Panyd|The muffin is not subtle]]</sup> 09:17, 5 June 2021 (UTC)


=== [[:The Family Man (Indian TV series)]] ===
=== [[:The Family Man (Indian TV series)]] ===

Revision as of 09:17, 5 June 2021

    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here



    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Yair Lapid

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent

    vandalism. Idan (username is Zvikorn) (talk) 18:37, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]

    Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 21:36, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    User talk:JavaHurricane/Archive 2

    Extended confirmed protection: Persistent

    Talk!) 22:01, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]

    Extended confirmed protected for a period of 5 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:41, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Digital Underground

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Binksternet (talk) 00:53, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    @Binksternet: Please spell it out so a clueless admin can see what warrants protection. The IP appears to be putting names in alpha order and I don't see an explanation for why that should not occur. Is there anything on talk? Johnuniq (talk) 05:22, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Palestinian keffiyeh

    Temporary pending changes. Natadmim (talk) 01:49, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Anarchyte (talk) 08:51, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Marianne and Mark

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of

    unsourced or poorly sourced content – One registered user and multiple IPs have been repeatedly adding the same unsourced trivia content since mid-2019. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 03:56, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]

    Don Quixote

    Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP starting with 50 keeps re-adding quote to the middle of a sentence in the lead. Crossroads -talk- 04:00, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 08:53, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Cade Cunningham

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent

    WP:BLP vandalism from SPAs and IPs. Laplorfill (talk) 04:08, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]

    Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 09:14, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Johnny Owen

    Semi-protection: Featured article and Approximately 12 reversions by 4 users in the last 24 hours. Ratnahastintalk 04:12, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked. - as the main account creating disruptive edits was blocked it doesn't look like there's enough additional activity to warrant protection. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 09:15, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Vhhhhjhgy

    Temporary semi-protection. Vhhhhjhgy (talk) 05:20, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done User pages are automatically protected from editing from IPs. Anarchyte (talk) 08:48, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    User talk:Vhhhhjhgy

    Indefinite move protection. Vhhhhjhgy (talk) 05:22, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done No reason given. Anarchyte (talk) 08:47, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Rham!

    Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistant user vivibelle page vandalism. LatteLaz (talk) 06:18, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 09:16, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Tomorrow X Together

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP users persistently adding EPs to the discography section even though there is a hidden comment that says only to add studio albums. EN-Jungwon 06:34, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 09:17, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    The Family Man (Indian TV series)

    Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Various ip are editing this, as this is currently trending in india. So i request to protect the page untill the trend ends. Jogesh 69 (talk) 07:12, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    I do not see sufficient disruption to justify protection at this point (which of course can change in a few hours)--Ymblanter (talk) 07:35, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Caillou

    Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 07:50, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    K. Surendran (politician)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This article has been the target of a significant amount of vandalism by a number of different IP editors in the last two days. I think it's due to a corruption scandal that the article's subject is allegedly involved in. Swadge2 (talk) 08:04, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Yami Gautam

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. -- DaxServer (talk) 08:26, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Detroit Tigers

    Permanent semi-protection: Sports rivalry vandalism by IP's. Page came off protection for the same reason less than a month ago. TomCat4680 (talk) 08:35, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Drew Lock

    Semi-protection: Persistent

    vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 08:47, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]

    Luis Elizondo

    Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. OneUpOnUs (talk) 08:49, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.


    Israel-Hamas War

    I would like to request that... (the map be updated to show that Israel now controls the entire Gaza-Egypt border) . LordOfWalruses (talk) 15:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    @LordOfWalruses this is not the place. Contentious topics should not be unprotected. 48JCLTALK 12:42, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @
    threads critiques 15:09, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    The talk page
    Talk:Israel-Hamas War is protected, therefore edit requests by non-extended-confirmed users land here. That is acceptable, and this request made above is reasonable. The people who actually do participate on that talk page should be reviewing requests here that remain open and haven't been declined for days. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]

    New York City

    most populous city in the United States to most popular city in the United States 2003:D2:CF20:692D:AC84:8FDF:F65E:C6B1 (talk) 13:41, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Source? —
    threads critiques 15:06, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    Not done – Unsourced claim for something that's inherently unquantifiable. Favonian (talk) 18:59, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Actually it is quantifiable. The measurement would be tourist visits. In that respect, based on sources I found, New York City does indeed come out number one when considering only US cities, in terms of both foreign tourism as well as domestic tourism. For US states, on the other hand New York isn't even in the top three. But changing "populous" to "popular" is just wrong and vague, and doesn't reflect the sources already cited. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:37, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Create a level 3 header with a link to the article in question, then a {{pagelinks}} template and then the reason.

    Handled requests

    A rolling archive of the last seven days of protection requests can be found at

    Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Rolling archive
    .