The Economist: Difference between revisions

Listen to this article
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Extended confirmed users
2,035 edits
m CE: Flagging for original research. removing some original research. see talk page
MIG1951 (talk | contribs)
144 edits
mNo edit summary
Line 193: Line 193:
In 2008, [[Jon Meacham]], former editor of ''Newsweek'' and a self-described "fan", criticised ''The Economist''{{'s}} focus on analysis over original reporting.<ref>{{cite news |title=Jon Meacham Wants Newsweek to Be More Like Hayes' Esquire |url=http://www.observer.com/node/39374 |work=The New York Observer |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080522125448/http://www.observer.com/node/39374 |archive-date=22 May 2008 |accessdate=27 April 2008}}</ref>
In 2008, [[Jon Meacham]], former editor of ''Newsweek'' and a self-described "fan", criticised ''The Economist''{{'s}} focus on analysis over original reporting.<ref>{{cite news |title=Jon Meacham Wants Newsweek to Be More Like Hayes' Esquire |url=http://www.observer.com/node/39374 |work=The New York Observer |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080522125448/http://www.observer.com/node/39374 |archive-date=22 May 2008 |accessdate=27 April 2008}}</ref>


In 2012, ''The Economist'' was [[2012 ICT Skype controversy|accused]] of hacking into the computer of Justice [[Mohammed Nizamul Huq]] of the Bangladesh Supreme Court, leading to his resignation as the chairman of the [[International Crimes Tribunal (Bangladesh)|International Crimes Tribunal]].<ref name=ICTleaks>{{cite magazine |title=Discrepancy in Dhaka |url=https://www.economist.com/blogs/banyan/2012/12/bangladesh |magazine=The Economist |date=8 December 2012}}</ref><ref name=ICTleaks1>{{cite news |title=Economist accused of hacking ICT judge's computer |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/bangladesh-crimes-tribunal-accuses-the-economist-magazine-of-hacking-judges-computer/2012/12/09/8f248da2-421e-11e2-8c8f-fbebf7ccab4e_story.html |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |date=9 December 2012}}{{dead link|date=August 2016}}</ref><ref name=ICTleaks2>{{cite news |last=Hossain |first=Farid |date=9 December 2012|title=Economist magazine faces contempt in Bangladesh |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20121209/as-bangladesh-war-crimes |newspaper=[[HuffPost]] |agency=Associated Press}}</ref><ref name=ICTleaks3>{{cite news |title=Bangladeshi war crimes tribunal issues notice to The Economist |url=http://www.indianexpress.com/news/bangladeshi-war-crimes-tribunal-issues-notice-to-the-economist/1041394 |newspaper=[[The Indian Express]] |date=6 December 2012}}</ref><ref name=ICTleaks4>{{cite news |title=Tribunal chief's net talks, mail hacked |url=http://www.thedailystar.net/newDesign/news-details.php?nid=260294 |newspaper=[[The Daily Star (Bangladesh)|Daily Star]] |date=7 December 2012}}</ref><ref name=ICTleaks5>{{cite magazine |title=The trial of the birth of a nation |url=https://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21568349-week-chairman-bangladeshs-international-crimes-tribunal-resigned-we-explain |magazine=The Economist |date=15 December 2012}}</ref> The magazine denied the accusations.
In 2012, ''The Economist'' was [[2012 ICT Skype controversy|accused]] of hacking into the computer of Justice [[Mohammed Nizamul Huq]] of the [[Bangladesh]] Supreme Court, leading to his resignation as the chairman of the [[International Crimes Tribunal (Bangladesh)|International Crimes Tribunal]].<ref name=ICTleaks>{{cite magazine |title=Discrepancy in Dhaka |url=https://www.economist.com/blogs/banyan/2012/12/bangladesh |magazine=The Economist |date=8 December 2012}}</ref><ref name=ICTleaks1>{{cite news |title=Economist accused of hacking ICT judge's computer |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/bangladesh-crimes-tribunal-accuses-the-economist-magazine-of-hacking-judges-computer/2012/12/09/8f248da2-421e-11e2-8c8f-fbebf7ccab4e_story.html |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |date=9 December 2012}}{{dead link|date=August 2016}}</ref><ref name=ICTleaks2>{{cite news |last=Hossain |first=Farid |date=9 December 2012|title=Economist magazine faces contempt in Bangladesh |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20121209/as-bangladesh-war-crimes |newspaper=[[HuffPost]] |agency=Associated Press}}</ref><ref name=ICTleaks3>{{cite news |title=Bangladeshi war crimes tribunal issues notice to The Economist |url=http://www.indianexpress.com/news/bangladeshi-war-crimes-tribunal-issues-notice-to-the-economist/1041394 |newspaper=[[The Indian Express]] |date=6 December 2012}}</ref><ref name=ICTleaks4>{{cite news |title=Tribunal chief's net talks, mail hacked |url=http://www.thedailystar.net/newDesign/news-details.php?nid=260294 |newspaper=[[The Daily Star (Bangladesh)|Daily Star]] |date=7 December 2012}}</ref><ref name=ICTleaks5>{{cite magazine |title=The trial of the birth of a nation |url=https://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21568349-week-chairman-bangladeshs-international-crimes-tribunal-resigned-we-explain |magazine=The Economist |date=15 December 2012}}</ref> The magazine denied the accusations.


In 2014, the magazine withdrew a harshly-criticised review of a book by [[Edward E. Baptist|Edward Baptist]] on slavery and American capitalism. ''The Economist'' had complained that "[a]lmost all the blacks in his book are victims, almost all the whites villains".<ref>{{cite news |title = Blood cotton |url = https://www.economist.com/news/books-and-arts/21615482-how-slaves-built-american-capitalism-blood-cotton |work = The Economist |accessdate = 6 September 2014 }}</ref> Baptist attributed the harsh review to the magazine's adherence to "[[Market fundamentalism|free-market fundamentalist]]" theories, "the idea that everything would be better if measured first and last by its efficiency at producing profit".<ref>Edward Baptist (7 September 2014). [http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/09/economist-review-slavery-110687.html What the ''Economist'' Doesn't Get About Slavery&nbsp;– and My Book]. ''[[Politico]].'' Retrieved 20 June 2015.</ref>
In 2014, the magazine withdrew a harshly-criticised review of a book by [[Edward E. Baptist|Edward Baptist]] on slavery and American capitalism. ''The Economist'' had complained that "[a]lmost all the blacks in his book are victims, almost all the whites villains".<ref>{{cite news |title = Blood cotton |url = https://www.economist.com/news/books-and-arts/21615482-how-slaves-built-american-capitalism-blood-cotton |work = The Economist |accessdate = 6 September 2014 }}</ref> Baptist attributed the harsh review to the magazine's adherence to "[[Market fundamentalism|free-market fundamentalist]]" theories, "the idea that everything would be better if measured first and last by its efficiency at producing profit".<ref>Edward Baptist (7 September 2014). [http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/09/economist-review-slavery-110687.html What the ''Economist'' Doesn't Get About Slavery&nbsp;– and My Book]. ''[[Politico]].'' Retrieved 20 June 2015.</ref>

Revision as of 20:47, 26 May 2019

For the profession, see Economist. For the Lost episode, see The Economist (Lost). For other uses, see The Economist (disambiguation).

The Economist
ISSN
0013-0613
Websiteeconomist.com

The Economist is an

Pearson PLC held a 50% shareholding via The Financial Times Limited until August 2015. At that time, Pearson sold their share in the Economist. The Agnelli family's Exor paid £287m to raise their stake from 4.7% to 43.4% while the Economist paid £182m for the balance of 5.04m shares which will be distributed to current shareholders.[9] Aside from the Agnelli family, smaller shareholders in the company include Cadbury, Rothschild (21%), Schroder, Layton and other family interests as well as a number of staff and former staff shareholders.[9][10]

A board of trustees formally appoints the editor, who cannot be removed without its permission. Although The Economist has a global emphasis and scope, about two-thirds of the 75 staff journalists are based in the London borough of Westminster.[11] For the year to March 2016, the Economist Group declared operating profit of £61m.[12]

The Economist takes

better source needed] The publication's CEO described this recent global change,[clarification needed] which was first noticed in the 1990s and accelerated in the beginning of the 21st century as a "new age of Mass Intelligence".[15][16]

History

Front page of The Economist on 16 May 1846

The Economist was founded by the British businessman and banker James Wilson in 1843, to advance the repeal of the Corn Laws, a system of import tariffs.[17] A prospectus for the "newspaper" from 5 August 1843 enumerated thirteen areas of coverage that its editors wanted the publication to focus on:[18]

  1. Original leading articles, in which free-trade principles will be most rigidly applied to all the important questions of the day.
  2. Articles relating to some practical, commercial, agricultural, or foreign topic of passing interest, such as foreign treaties.
  3. An article on the elementary principles of political economy, applied to practical experience, covering the laws related to prices, wages, rent, exchange, revenue and taxes.
  4. Parliamentary reports, with particular focus on commerce, agriculture and free trade.
  5. Reports and accounts of popular movements advocating free trade.
  6. General news from the
    Court of St. James's, the Metropolis, the Provinces
    , Scotland, and Ireland.
  7. Commercial topics such as changes in fiscal regulations, the state and prospects of the markets, imports and exports, foreign news, the state of the manufacturing districts, notices of important new mechanical improvements, shipping news, the money market, and the progress of railways and public companies.
  8. Agricultural topics, including the application of geology and chemistry; notices of new and improved implements, state of crops, markets, prices, foreign markets and prices converted into English money; from time to time, in some detail, the plans pursued in Belgium, Switzerland, and other well-cultivated countries.
  9. Colonial and foreign topics, including trade, produce, political and fiscal changes, and other matters, including exposés
    on the evils of restriction and protection, and the advantages of free intercourse and trade.
  10. Law reports, confined chiefly to areas important to commerce, manufacturing, and agriculture.
  11. Books, confined chiefly, but not so exclusively, to commerce, manufacturing, and agriculture, and including all treatises on political economy, finance, or taxation.
  12. A commercial gazette, with prices and statistics of the week.
  13. Correspondence and inquiries from the news magazine's readers.

Wilson described it as taking part in "a severe contest between intelligence, which presses forward, and an unworthy, timid ignorance obstructing our progress", a phrase which still appears on its masthead as the publication's mission.[19]

It has long been respected as "one of the most competent and subtle Western periodicals on public affairs".[20] The publication was a major source of financial and economic information for Karl Marx in the formulation of socialist theory;[21] he wrote: "the London Economist, the European organ of the aristocracy of finance, described most strikingly the attitude of this class."[22]

Its logo was designed in 1959 by Reynolds Stone.[23]

In January 2012, The Economist launched a new weekly section devoted exclusively to China, the first new country section since the introduction of a section about the United States in 1942.[24]

In August 2015, The Economist Group bought back 5 million of its shares (worth $284 million) from Pearson. Pearson's remaining shares (worth $447 million) would be sold to Exor.[25][26]

List of editors

Walter Bagehot, one of the early editors of The Economist

The editors of The Economist have been:

Opinions

Main article: The Economist editorial stance
The Economist Building (until 2017), St James's Street, photo by Alison and Peter Smithson

When the news magazine was founded, the term "

global warming.[35] According to one former editor, Bill Emmott, "the Economist's philosophy has always been liberal, not conservative".[36] Individual contributors take diverse views. The Economist favours the support, through central banks, of banks and other important corporations. This principle can, in a much more limited form, be traced back to Walter Bagehot, the third editor of The Economist, who argued that the Bank of England should support major banks that got into difficulties. Karl Marx deemed The Economist the "European organ" of "the aristocracy of finance".[37]

The news magazine has also supported liberal causes on social issues such as recognition of gay marriages,[38] legalisation of drugs,[39] criticises the US tax model,[40] and seems to support some government regulation on health issues, such as smoking in public,[41] as well as bans on spanking children.[42] The Economist consistently favours guest worker programmes, parental choice of school, and amnesties[43] and once published an "obituary" of God.[44] The Economist also has a long record of supporting gun control.[45]

The Economist has endorsed the Labour Party (in 2005) the Conservative Party (in 2010 and 2015),[46][47] and the Liberal Democrats (in 2017) at general election time in Britain, and both Republican and Democratic candidates in the United States. Economist.com puts its stance this way:

What, besides free trade and free markets, does The Economist believe in? "It is to the Radicals that The Economist still likes to think of itself as belonging. The extreme centre is the paper's historical position". That is as true today as when Crowther [Geoffrey, Economist editor 1938–1956] said it in 1955. The Economist considers itself the enemy of privilege, pomposity and predictability. It has backed conservatives such as Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher. It has supported the Americans in Vietnam. But it has also endorsed Harold Wilson and Bill Clinton, and espoused a variety of liberal causes: opposing capital punishment from its earliest days, while favouring penal reform and decolonisation, as well as—more recently—gun control and gay marriage.[23]

The Economist frequently accuses figures and countries of corruption or dishonesty. In recent years, for example, it criticised Paul Wolfowitz, World Bank president; Silvio Berlusconi, Italy's Prime Minister (who dubbed it The Ecommunist);[48] Laurent-Désiré Kabila, the late president of the Democratic Republic of the Congo; Robert Mugabe, the former head of government in Zimbabwe; and, recently, Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, the president of Argentina.[49] The Economist also called for Bill Clinton's impeachment and, after the emergence of the Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse,[50] for Donald Rumsfeld's resignation. Though The Economist initially gave vigorous support for the US-led invasion of Iraq, it later called the operation "bungled from the start" and criticised the "almost criminal negligence" of the Bush Administration's handling of the war, while maintaining, in 2007, that pulling out in the short term would be irresponsible.[51] In the 2004 US election, the editors "reluctantly" backed John Kerry.[52][53] In the 2008 US election The Economist endorsed Barack Obama, while using the front cover of the issue published on the eve of the election to promote his candidacy.[54] In the 2012 US election, Barack Obama was again endorsed: the editorial said that they preferred Obama on the economy, foreign policy and health care, but criticised him for running a negative campaign against Romney and for a "...poor appreciation of commerce."[55]

In an editorial marking its 175th anniversary, The Economist criticised adherents to liberalism for becoming too inclined to protect the political status quo rather than pursue reform.

open immigration, a rethink of the social contract with more emphasis on education, and a revival of liberal internationalism.[56]

Tone and voice

Though it has many individual columns, by tradition and current practice the magazine ensures a uniform voice—aided by the anonymity of writers—throughout its pages,[57] as if most articles were written by a single author, which may be perceived to display dry, understated wit, and precise use of language.[58][59] The Economist has traditionally—albeit not always consistently—persisted in referring to itself as a "newspaper", rather than a newsmagazine, due to the gradual pace of its transformation in format from newsprint to glossy colour (articles were printed on the front page into the 1950s) in addition to its general focus on current affairs as opposed to specialist subjects.[5]

The Economist's treatment of economics presumes a working familiarity with fundamental concepts of classical economics. For instance, it does not explain terms like invisible hand, macroeconomics, or demand curve, and may take just six or seven words to explain the theory of comparative advantage. Articles involving economics do not presume any formal training on the part of the reader and aim to be accessible to the educated layman. It usually does not translate short French (and German) quotes or phrases. It does describe the business or nature of even well-known entities, writing, for example, "Goldman Sachs, an investment bank".[60]

Editorial anonymity

Articles often take a definite editorial stance and almost never carry a byline. Not even the name of the editor (since 2015, Zanny Minton Beddoes[61]) is printed in the issue. It is a long-standing tradition that an editor's only signed article during their tenure is written on the occasion of their departure from the position. The author of a piece is named in certain circumstances: when notable persons are invited to contribute opinion pieces; when journalists of The Economist compile special reports (previously known as surveys); for the Year in Review special edition; and to highlight a potential conflict of interest over a book review. The names of The Economist editors and correspondents can be located on the media directory pages of the website.[62] Online blog pieces are signed with the initials of the writer and authors of print stories are allowed to note their authorship from their personal web sites.[63] "This approach is not without its faults (we have four staff members with the initials "J.P.", for example) but is the best compromise between total anonymity and full bylines, in our view", wrote one anonymous writer of The Economist.[64]

The editors say this is necessary because "collective voice and personality matter more than the identities of individual journalists"[65] and reflects "a collaborative effort".[66] In most articles, authors refer to themselves as "your correspondent" or "this reviewer". The writers of the titled opinion columns tend to refer to themselves by the title (hence, a sentence in the "Lexington" column might read "Lexington was informed...").

The American author

Michael Lewis has criticised the magazine's editorial anonymity, labelling it a means to hide the youth and inexperience of those writing articles. In 1991 Lewis quipped: "The magazine is written by young people pretending to be old people ... If American readers got a look at the pimply complexions of their economic gurus, they would cancel their subscriptions in droves".[67] Although individual articles are written anonymously, there is no secrecy over who the writers are as they are listed on The Economist's website, which also provides summaries of their careers and academic qualifications.[68]

John Ralston Saul describes The Economist as a "...magazine which hides the names of the journalists who write its articles in order to create the illusion that they dispense disinterested truth rather than opinion. This sales technique, reminiscent of pre-Reformation Catholicism, is not surprising in a publication named after the social science most given to wild guesses and imaginary facts presented in the guise of inevitability and exactitude. That it is the Bible of the corporate executive indicates to what extent received wisdom is the daily bread of a managerial civilization."[69]

Circulation

Each of The Economist issue's official date range is from Saturday to the following Friday. The Economist posts each week's new content online at approximately 2100 Thursday evening UK time, ahead of the official publication date.[70]

In 1877, the publication's circulation was 3,700, and in 1920 it had risen to 6,000. Circulation increased rapidly after 1945, reaching 100,000 by 1970.[23]

Circulation is audited by the Audit Bureau of Circulations (ABC). From around 30,000 in 1960 it has risen to near 1 million by 2000 and by 2016 to about 1.3 million.[71] Sales inside North America were in 2007 around 54 per cent of the total, with sales in the UK making up 14 per cent of the total and continental Europe 19 per cent. The Economist claims sales, both by subscription and at newsagents, in over 200 countries. Of its American readers, two out of three earn more than $100,000 a year.[72]

The Economist once boasted about its limited circulation. In the early 1990s it used the slogan "The Economist – not read by millions of people". "Never in the history of journalism has so much been read for so long by so few," wrote Geoffrey Crowther, a former editor.[73]

The Economist Newspaper Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary of

Evelyn Robert de Rothschild
was Chairman of the company from 1972 to 1989.

Letters

The Economist frequently receives letters from senior businesspeople, politicians, ambassadors, and from spokespeople for various government departments, non-governmental organisations and lobbies. Well-written or witty responses from anyone are considered, and controversial issues frequently produce a torrent of letters. For example, the survey of

Shell and the UK Institute of Directors.[74]

Many of the letters published are critical of its stance or commentary. After The Economist ran a critique of

right-of-reply laws without compromising editorial independence.[76]

It is extremely rare for any comment by The Economist to appear alongside any published letter. Letters published in the news magazine are typically between 150 and 200 words long (and began with the salutation "Sir" until the editorship of Zanny Minton Beddoes, the first female editor; they now have no salutation). Previous to a change in procedure, all responses to on-line articles were usually published in "The Inbox".[77] Comments can now be made directly under each article.

Features

Visualisation of the Big Mac Index in January 2012

The Economist's primary focus is world events, politics and business, but it also runs regular sections on science and technology as well as books and the arts. Approximately every two weeks, the publication includes an in-depth special report

surveys) on a given topic. The five main categories are Countries and Regions, Business, Finance and Economics, Science and Technology, and Other. Every three months, it publishes a technology report called Technology Quarterly[79]
or TQ, a special section focusing on recent trends and developments in science and technology.

Since July 2007, there has also been a complete audio edition of the news magazine available 9 pm London time on Thursdays.[80] The audio version of The Economist is produced by the production company Talking Issues. The company records the full text of the news magazine in mp3 format, including the extra pages in the UK edition. The weekly 130 MB download is free for subscribers and available for a fee for non-subscribers.

The publication's writers adopt a tight style that seeks to include the maximum amount of information in a limited space.[81] David G. Bradley, publisher of The Atlantic, described the formula as "a consistent world view expressed, consistently, in tight and engaging prose".[82]

There is a section of economic statistics. Tables such as employment statistics are published each week and there are special statistical features too. It is unique among British weeklies in providing authoritative coverage of official statistics and its rankings of international statistics have been decisive.[83] In addition, The Economist is known for its Big Mac Index, which it first published in 1986, which uses the price of the hamburger in different countries as an informal measure of the purchasing power of currencies.[84][85]

The publication runs several opinion columns whose names reflect their topic:

Other regular features include:

  • Face Value, about prominent people in the business world
  • Free Exchange, a general economics column, frequently based on academic research, replaced the column Economics Focus in January 2012
  • An obituary. Since 1997 it has been written by Ann Wroe.[93]
  • sections on science and the arts

The news magazine goes to press on Thursdays, between 6 pm and 7 pm GMT, and is available at newsagents in many countries the next day. It is printed at seven sites around the world. Known on their website as "This week's print edition", it is available online, albeit with only the first five viewed articles being free (and available to subscribers only mid-October 2009 – 2010).

The Economist published in 2015 its first US college rankings, focused on comparable economical advantages defined as 'the economic value of a university is equal to the gap between how much its students subsequently earn, and how much they might have made had they studied elsewhere'. Based on set of strict criteria sourced from US Department of Education ("College Scorecard") with relevant 'expected earnings' and multiple statistics applied in calculation of 'median earnings' conclusive evaluation method has been applied to run the scorecard's earnings data through a multiple regression analysis, a common method of measuring the relationships between variables.[94]

The Economist also produces the annual The World in [Year] publication. It also sponsors a writing award.

The Economist Awards

Innovation Awards

File:Economist innovation awards logo.png
Innovation Awards logo

The Economist sponsors the yearly "Economist Innovation Awards", in the categories of bioscience, computing and communications, energy and the environment, social and economic innovation, business-process innovation, consumer products, and a special "no boundaries" category.[95] The awards have been held since 2002. Nominations are held between 2 and 30 April. The award ceremony is then hosted on 15 November. Choices are based on the following factors:[96]

  • How much revenue their innovation has made their company or its economic impact on a specific good cause or society in general
  • The effect their work has had on the marketplace (or if it's created a whole new marketplace altogether)
  • The impact their innovation has had on a new type of science or technology

Writing prize

In 1999, The Economist organised a global futurist writing competition,

Royal Dutch/Shell, the competition included a first prize of US$20,000 and publication in The Economist's annual flagship publication, The World In.[97] Over 3,000 entries from around the world were submitted via a website set up for the purpose and at various Royal Dutch Shell offices worldwide.[97]

The judging panel included

Royal Dutch Shell),[97] and Matt Ridley (a British scientist and member of the House of Lords).[99]

Censorship

Sections of The Economist criticising authoritarian regimes are frequently removed from the magazine by the authorities in those countries. The Economist regularly has difficulties with the ruling party of Singapore, the People's Action Party, which had successfully sued it, in a Singaporean court, for libel.[100]

Like many other publications, The Economist is subjected to censorship in India whenever it depicts a map of Kashmir. The maps are stamped by Indian Customs officials as being "neither correct, nor authentic". Issues are sometimes delayed, but not stopped or seized.[101]

On 15 June 2006, Iran banned the sale of The Economist when it published a map labelling the Persian Gulf simply as Gulf—a choice that derives its political significance from the Persian Gulf naming dispute.[102]

In a separate incident, the government of

Zimbabwe African National Union – Patriotic Front party. The decapitation claim was retracted[103] and allegedly fabricated by the woman's husband. The correspondent was later acquitted, only to receive a deportation
order.

On 19 August 2013, The Economist disclosed that the Missouri Department of Corrections had censored its issue of 29 June 2013. According to the letter sent by the department, prisoners were not allowed to receive the issue because "1. it constitutes a threat to the security or discipline of the institution; 2. may facilitate or encourage criminal activity; or 3. may interfere with the rehabilitation of an offender".[104]

Criticism, accusation and praise

In 1991,

Oxford University, Magdalen College.[106] The Guardian wrote that "its writers rarely see a political or economic problem that cannot be solved by the trusted three-card trick of privatisation, deregulation and liberalisation".[109]

In 2008, Jon Meacham, former editor of Newsweek and a self-described "fan", criticised The Economist's focus on analysis over original reporting.[110]

In 2012, The Economist was accused of hacking into the computer of Justice Mohammed Nizamul Huq of the Bangladesh Supreme Court, leading to his resignation as the chairman of the International Crimes Tribunal.[111][112][113][114][115][116] The magazine denied the accusations.

In 2014, the magazine withdrew a harshly-criticised review of a book by Edward Baptist on slavery and American capitalism. The Economist had complained that "[a]lmost all the blacks in his book are victims, almost all the whites villains".[117] Baptist attributed the harsh review to the magazine's adherence to "free-market fundamentalist" theories, "the idea that everything would be better if measured first and last by its efficiency at producing profit".[118]

Praise and accolades

In 2005, the Chicago Tribune named it the best English-language magazine noting its strength in international reporting "where it does not feel moved to cover a faraway land only at a time of unmitigated disaster" and that it kept a wall between its reporting and its more conservative editorial policies.[119]

Notes

  1. ^ The title and its design are references to the book No Logo (1999).

References

  1. ^ Contrastive Media Analysis. 2012. p. 51.
  2. ^ a b c d About us  – The Economist
  3. ^ "Is The Economist left- or right-wing?". The Economist. 2 September 2013. Retrieved 24 April 2016.
  4. ^ "True Progressivism". The Economist. 13 October 2012. Retrieved 16 October 2016.
  5. ^ a b c "Seriously popular: The Economist now claims to reach 5.3m readers a week in print and online". pressgazette.co.uk. Retrieved 22 June 2015.
  6. ^ "Why does The Economist call itself a newspaper?". The Economist. 1 September 2013.
  7. ^ Locations[permanent dead link]. Economist Group. Retrieved 12 September 2009.
  8. ^ Maps Archived 5 September 2011 at the Wayback Machine. City of Westminster. Retrieved 28 August 2009.
  9. ^ a b West, Karl (15 August 2015). "The Economist becomes a family affair". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 15 August 2015. Pearson, the education and publishing giant that has held a non-controlling 50% stake since 1928, is selling the holding for £469m. The deal will make Italy's Agnelli family, founders of the Fiat car empire, the largest shareholder
  10. ^ "Agnellis, Rothschilds close in on Economist". POLITICO. 11 August 2015. Retrieved 1 December 2018.
  11. ^ "So what's the secret of 'The Economist'?". The Independent. London. 26 February 2006. Retrieved 27 April 2008.
  12. ^ "Results at a glance | Economist Group". www.economistgroup.com. Retrieved 21 September 2016.
  13. ^ "Don't leave us this way". The Economist. 12 July 2014. Retrieved 26 July 2014.
  14. ^ "How our readers view The Economist". The Economist. Archived from the original on 7 September 2006. Retrieved 27 December 2006.
  15. ^ Oberholzer-Gee, Felix; Bharat, N. Anand; Lizzie, Gomez. "The Economist". Harvard Business School Case 710-441, July 2010. Hbs.edu.
  16. ^ Oberholzer-Gee, Felix; Bharat, N. Anand; Lizzie, Gomez. "The Economist. Harvard Business School Case 710-441, July 2010" (PDF). American.edu. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 September 2013. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  17. ^ From the Corn Laws to Your Mailbox, The MIT Press Log, 30 January 2007. Retrieved 11 June 2010.
  18. ^ "Prospectus". The Economist. 5 August 1843. Retrieved 27 December 2006.
  19. ^ "Opinion: leaders and letters to the Editor". The Economist. Retrieved 1 May 2011.
  20. JSTOR 2009044
    .(subscription required)
  21. ISBN 9781349155149
    .
  22. ^ Karl Marx, The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte, VI (1852)
  23. ^ a b c "About us". The Economist. 18 November 2010. Retrieved 21 September 2016.
  24. ^ "The Economist Launches New China Section". Asian Media Journal. Archived from the original on 1 February 2012. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  25. ^ "Pearson Unloads $731 Million Stake in the Economist". HuffPost. 12 August 2015. Retrieved 15 August 2015.
  26. ^ West, Karl (15 August 2015). "The Economist becomes a family affair". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 15 August 2015. Pearson, the education and publishing giant that has held a non-controlling 50% stake since 1928, is selling the holding for £469m. The deal will make Italy's Agnelli family, founders of the Fiat car empire, the largest shareholder
  27. ^ The Concise Dictionary of National Biography makes him assistant editor 1858–1860
  28. ^ He was Wilson's son-in-law
  29. ^ A journalist and biographer
  30. ^ Discuz! Team and Comsenz UI Team. "economist150周年（1993） – 经济学人资料库 – ECO中文网 – Powered by Discuz! Archiver". Retrieved 29 June 2015.
  31. ^ "John Micklethwait leaving the Economist to join Bloomberg News". The Guardian.
  32. ^ "Zanny Minton Beddoes appointed new editor of The Economist". The Economist.
  33. ^ "Globalisation: The redistribution of hope". The Economist. 16 December 2010. Retrieved 23 April 2011.
  34. ^ George Monbiot (11 January 2005). "George Monbiot, Punitive – and it works". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 25 May 2012.
  35. ^ "Buttonwood: Let them heat coke". The Economist. 14 June 2008. Retrieved 25 May 2012.
  36. ^ Emmot, Bill (8 December 2000). "Time for a referendum on the monarchy". Comment. London. Retrieved 27 December 2006.
  37. ^ Marx, Karl (1852). The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte.
  38. ^ Let them wed, cover article on 4 January 1996
  39. ^ How to stop the drug wars, cover article on 7 March 2009. The publication calls legalisation "the least bad solution".
  40. ^ "Tax reform in America: A simple bare necessity". The Economist. Retrieved 25 May 2012.
  41. ^ "Smoking and public health: Breathe easy". The Economist. 10 June 2010. Retrieved 25 May 2012.
  42. ^ "Spare The Rod, Say Some", The Economist, 31 May 2008.
  43. ^ Sense, not Sensenbrenner, The Economist, 30 March 2006
  44. ^ "Obituary: God". The Economist. 23 December 1999.
  45. ^ "Lexington: Reflections on Virginia Tech". The Economist. 8 April 2009. Retrieved 13 April 2011.
  46. ^ "The Economist backs the Conservatives", The Guardian (PA report), 29 April 2010.
  47. ^ "Who should govern Britain?". The Economist. Retrieved 11 May 2015.
  48. Independent Media Center
    . Retrieved 27 December 2006.
  49. ^ "Cristina in the land of make believe". The Economist. 1 May 2008.
  50. ^ "Resign Rumsfeld". The Economist. 6 May 2004. Retrieved 27 December 2006.
  51. ^ "Mugged by reality". The Economist. 22 March 2007. Retrieved 9 April 2007.
  52. ^ "Crunch time in America". The Economist. 2 November 2000. Retrieved 27 December 2006.
  53. ^ "The incompetent or the incoherent?". The Economist. 28 October 2004. Retrieved 27 December 2006.
  54. ^ "It's time". The Economist. 30 October 2008.
  55. ^ "Our American Endorsement. Which one?". The Economist. 3 November 2012. Retrieved 4 November 2012.
  56. ^ a b "The Economist at 175". The Economist. 13 September 2018. Retrieved 17 September 2018.
  57. ^ "Style Guide". The Economist. 27 September 2011. Retrieved 8 February 2013.
  58. ^ "The Economist – Tone". The Economist. Retrieved 27 December 2006.
  59. ^ "Johnson". The Economist. Archived from the original on 19 December 2006. Retrieved 27 December 2006. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  60. ^ "A bank by any other name". The Economist. Retrieved 16 September 2008.[permanent dead link]
  61. ^ Stuart Kemp. "Economist magazine appoints its first female editor". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 29 June 2015.
  62. ^ "Media directory". The Economist. Retrieved 25 May 2012.
  63. ^ "Why The Economist has no bylines". Andreaskluth.org. Retrieved 25 May 2012. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |work= (help)
  64. ^ "Why are The Economist's writers anonymous?". The Economist. Retrieved 25 September 2016.
  65. ^ "The Economist – About us". The Economist. 18 November 2010. Retrieved 11 June 2012.
  66. ^ "Economist Editor Micklethwait brings his global perspective to the Twin Cities". MinnPost.com. 29 April 2008. Archived from the original on 5 July 2008. Retrieved 16 September 2008. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  67. ^ a b "The Economics of the Colonial Cringe: Pseudonomics and the Sneer on the Face of The Economist". The Washington Post. Retrieved 27 April 2008.
  68. ^ "Media directory". The Economist. Retrieved 31 December 2017.
  69. ^ "The Doubter's Companion: A Dictionary of Aggressive Common Sense". Amazon.com. Retrieved 9 August 2013.
  70. ^ "The Economist launches on Android". The Economist. 2 August 2011. Retrieved 26 February 2018.
  71. ^ Lucinda Southern (17 February 2016). "The Economist Plans to Double Circulation Profits in 5 Years". Digiday. Retrieved 7 July 2016.
  72. NPR
    . 8 March 2006. Retrieved 27 December 2006.
  73. ^ Moseley, Ray. ""Economist" aspires to influence, and many say it does" (pay archive). The Chicago Tribune. Retrieved 14 May 2008.
  74. ^ "Compilation: Full text of responses to Economist survey on Corporate Social Responsibility (January–February 2005)". Business & Human Rights. Retrieved 3 February 2007.
  75. ^ "Letters: On Amnesty International and human rights, Iraq, tax breaks 4 April 2007". The Economist. 4 April 2007. Retrieved 9 November 2007.
  76. ^ Francis T. Seow (1998). The Media Enthralled: Singapore Revisited. Lynne Rienner Publishers. pp. 171–175. Retrieved 25 May 2012.
  77. ^ "Latest blog posts". The Economist. Retrieved 9 August 2013.
  78. ^ "Special reports". The Economist. Retrieved 9 August 2013.
  79. ^ Stay informed today and every day (1 June 2013). "Technology Quarterly". The Economist. Retrieved 9 August 2013.
  80. ^ Allen, Katie (11 July 2007). "Economist launches audio magazine". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 21 September 2016.
  81. ^ "The Economist style guide". The Economist. Retrieved 27 December 2006.
  82. ^ "A Seven Year Ambition". mediabistro.com. Archived from the original on 10 October 2008. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |work= (help); Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  83. ISBN 978-0-7658-0849-3
    .
  84. ISBN 978-0-321-55398-0
    .
  85. ^ "On the Hamburger Standard". The Economist. 6–12 September 1986.
  86. ^ "Charlemagne moves town". The Economist. 30 June 2010. Retrieved 26 March 2014.
  87. ^ "Britain's cheering gloom". The Economist. 30 June 2012. Retrieved 31 August 2012.
  88. ^ "The Bello column: Choosing a Name". The Economist. 30 January 2014. Retrieved 25 March 2014.
  89. ^ "The Economist's new China column: Chaguan". The Economist website. 13 September 2018. Retrieved 12 November 2018.
  90. ^ People: Jeremy Cliffe – Economist Media Directory. Retrieved 14/1/19
  91. ^ "Media Directory". The Economist. 9 June 2011. Retrieved 13 June 2012.
  92. ^ "Lexington: Peter David". The Economist website. 11 May 2012. Retrieved 12 May 2012.
  93. ^ "An Interview with Ann Wroe, Obituaries Writer for The Economist". 6 June 2014. Retrieved 21 December 2014.
  94. ^ "The Economist "The value of university: Our first-ever college rankings"". The Economist. Retrieved 29 October 2015.
  95. ^ "Economist Innovation Awards Categories". The Economist Group. Archived from the original on 17 January 2013. Retrieved 25 May 2012. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  96. ^ "Economist Innovation Awards Nomination Process". Economistconferences.co.uk. 4 May 2012. Archived from the original on 7 May 2012. Retrieved 25 May 2012. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  97. ^ a b c d "What is your vision of the future?". New Straights Times. 22 April 2000.
  98. ^ "Angel Investor Esther Dyson Increases Dosage in Health Startups". Bloomberg News. 26 December 2012.
  99. ^ "Getting better all the time". The Economist. 13 May 2010.
  100. ^ "Inconvenient truths in Singapore". Asia Times. Retrieved 31 January 2007.
  101. ^ "Censorship in India". The Economist. 7 December 2010.
  102. ^ "Iran bans The Economist over map". The Jerusalem Post. Retrieved 31 January 2007.
  103. ^ "Guardian and RFI correspondent risks two years in jail". Reporters Without Borders. Archived from the original on 4 April 2009. Retrieved 2 April 2014. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  104. ^ "The Economist in prison: About that missing issue". The Economist. 19 August 2013. Retrieved 2 April 2014.
  105. ^ "London Fog". Retrieved 2 September 2014.
  106. ^ a b "Not so groovy". The New Republic. London. 14 June 1999. Retrieved 27 April 2008.
  107. ^ Finkel, Rebecca (July 1999). "Nasty barbs fly between New Republic and Economist". Media Life. Archived from the original on 7 November 2015. Retrieved 27 April 2008. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  108. ^ "Effects of Recession and Dot Com Bubble". Data and Investment Consult. Retrieved 8 May 2011.
  109. ^ Stern, Stefan (21 August 2005). "Economist thrives on female intuition". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 2 January 2013.
  110. ^ "Jon Meacham Wants Newsweek to Be More Like Hayes' Esquire". The New York Observer. Archived from the original on 22 May 2008. Retrieved 27 April 2008.
  111. ^ "Discrepancy in Dhaka". The Economist. 8 December 2012.
  112. ^ "Economist accused of hacking ICT judge's computer". The Washington Post. 9 December 2012.[dead link]
  113. ^ Hossain, Farid (9 December 2012). "Economist magazine faces contempt in Bangladesh". HuffPost. Associated Press.
  114. ^ "Bangladeshi war crimes tribunal issues notice to The Economist". The Indian Express. 6 December 2012.
  115. ^ "Tribunal chief's net talks, mail hacked". Daily Star. 7 December 2012.
  116. ^ "The trial of the birth of a nation". The Economist. 15 December 2012.
  117. ^ "Blood cotton". The Economist. Retrieved 6 September 2014.
  118. ^ Edward Baptist (7 September 2014). What the Economist Doesn't Get About Slavery – and My Book. Politico. Retrieved 20 June 2015.
  119. ^ Entertainment: 50 Best Magazines, Chicago Tribune, 15 June 2006.

Further reading

External links

Wikimedia Commons has media related to The Economist.
Wikiquote has quotations related to The Economist.
Listen to this article
(2 parts, 19 minutes)
  2. Part 2
Spoken Wikipedia icon
These audio files were created from a revision of this article dated
Error: no date provided
, and do not reflect subsequent edits.
(
Audio help · More spoken articles
)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Economist&oldid=898929709"