Wikipedia:Requests for page protection: Difference between revisions

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Content deleted Content added
Line 89: Line 89:


'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Persistent [[WP:SOCK|sockpuppetry]]. [[User:EN-Jungwon|<font face="Brush Script MT"><span style="color:purple">EN</span></font>]]-'''''[[User talk:EN-Jungwon|<span style="color:orange">Jungwon</span>]]''''' 17:14, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Persistent [[WP:SOCK|sockpuppetry]]. [[User:EN-Jungwon|<font face="Brush Script MT"><span style="color:purple">EN</span></font>]]-'''''[[User talk:EN-Jungwon|<span style="color:orange">Jungwon</span>]]''''' 17:14, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
::{{RFPP|b|Aurora-mng|Oshwah}} [[User:CambridgeBayWeather|CambridgeBayWeather]], [[User talk:CambridgeBayWeather|Uqaqtuq (talk)]], [[Special:Contributions/CambridgeBayWeather|Huliva]] 02:13, 7 January 2021 (UTC)


=== [[:Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church]] ===
=== [[:Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church]] ===

Revision as of 02:13, 7 January 2021

    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here



    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Doom (franchise)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent

    vandalism. General Ization Talk 04:33, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]

    Declined
    Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Only two IP users involved. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:49, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]

    Scream (2022 film)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of

    unsourced or poorly sourced content – repeated addition of unsourced material to page. Joeyconnick (talk) 05:13, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]

    Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 01:50, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Space Jam

    Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Ahmetlii (talk) 09:14, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 01:53, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    ZOE Broadcasting Network and TV Patrol

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing for ZOE Broadcasting Network and vandalism for TV Patrol. Sean Ethan James D. Querubin (talk) 10:00, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Note: Everytime when TV Patrol was unprotected after the protection expires, IP users are keeping on vandalizing the article and changing anchors without citing a reliable source. Sean Ethan James D. Querubin (talk) 10:05, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Done CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 01:57, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Jon Ossoff

    Temporary move protection: Potentially subject to page-move vandalism temporarily. Jeuno (talk) 12:09, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined
    Pages are not protected preemptively. I don't see any evidence of page-move vandalism, and the other candidates' articles are not move-protected. — The Earwig talk 22:20, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]

    Angels (Robbie Williams song)

    Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page is subject to long-term disruptive editing from IP editors repeatedly removing the same sourced information. Popcornfud (talk) 12:23, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 01:58, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Francis Emeka

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent

    vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:42, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]

    Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 01:59, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Ahaana Krishna

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent

    vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:46, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 02:00, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Daniel Hannan

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent

    vandalism – Edit warring by PoV-pushing IPs. — Czello 14:40, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]

    Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 02:02, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Ace Ventura: Pet Detective

    Semi-protection: Persistent blanking of reliably-sourced content by IP editor whose IP changes every time. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 15:46, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    UPDATE: IP editor expressed here no interest in discussion, further reinforcing the need for protection. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 15:59, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 02:04, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Georgia (U.S. state)

    Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Addition of unsourced content and disruptive editing by IPs. Giraffer (talk·contribs) 16:14, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
      Talk to my owner:Online 21:29, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
      ]
    Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 02:07, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Perrie Edwards

    Temporary semi-protection: persistent violation of

    the biographies of living persons policy (persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content). D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 16:22, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 02:10, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    List of awards and nominations received by GFriend

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent

    sockpuppetry. EN-Jungwon 17:14, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]

    User(s) blocked: Aurora-mng (talk · contribs) blocked by Oshwah. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 02:13, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent

    vandalism. Elizium23 (talk) 17:24, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]

    List of Universal Television programs

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent

    sockpuppetry – That obsessive Happy Tree Friends fan is at it again. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 19:04, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]

    User(s) blocked. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:48, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
     Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:48, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Twenty-fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution

    Temporary semi-protection:- vandalism. Thechased (talk) 00:23, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:32, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Olympus Has Fallen

    Temporary semi-protection: IP Vandalism. BattleshipMan (talk) 01:48, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.


    Brianna Wu

    please update the sources for [12] and [13].

    12: https://archive.ph/ek0sE

    13: https://web.archive.org/web/20161101205623/http://www.briannawu.net/about

    Im not afraid (talk) 04:21, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    2024 Nuseirat rescue operation

    I would like to request that Nuseirat refugee camp massacre be linked under the 'See also' category in the same way this article is linked in the 'See also' category in the aforementioned article. This will give continuity between the two articles in avoid bias. matt. (talk) 06:45, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    • Automated comment: @
      Talk to my owner:Online 06:53, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply
      ]
    Not done – That article is currently linked to at the top of
    MOS:NOTSEEALSO: As a general rule, the "See also" section should not repeat links that appear in the article's body. Favonian (talk) 16:53, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]

    Create a level 3 header with a link to the article in question, then a {{pagelinks}} template and then the reason.

    Raphael Warnock

    Edit Politics Section:

    Sentence to edit:

    "Warnock has long opposed the death penalty, having advocated for death row inmate Troy Davis, who was executed in 2011 for killing a police officer despite evidence that supported his innocence."

    Proposed edit:

    "Warnock has long opposed the death penalty, having advocated for death row inmate Troy Davis, who was executed in 2011 for killing a police officer."

    Justification:

    The reason for this is because there is absolutely no proof or evidence, whatsoever, that supports his innocence. The article that was used as a citation https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-execution-georgia/clemency-denied-for-georgia-death-row-inmate-idUSTRE78J2NP20110920 clearly does not state anything about him being innocent, not at all. The only statement on his innocence is a quote from a 3rd party in Europe that has no familiarity with the case whatsoever. Reading Wikipedia's article on Troy Davis clearly states there were 34 witnesses from the prosecution, 9 of which identified Davis as the murderer. 7 of them recanted but where deemed by the courts to either A, be unreliable or B, not really a recantation. There were also witnesses who claimed they were hounded consistently for years to recant using coercion. He also had many trials with different Judges and under all that scrutiny the final appeals Judge stated it was "smoke and mirrors" and found them not to be credible. On top of that, they didn't have a single witness who recanted testify in court, not one and the other 2 witnesses refused to recant. There is about as much evidence he is innocent as there is evidence that there was mass voter fraud in the 2020 US election. May as well just put in Joe Biden's page that "Joe Biden still won the 2020 election despite evidence that supported mass voter fraud". https://law.georgia.gov/press-releases/2011-09-07/execution-set-troy-anthony-davis-convicted-1989-murder-savannah-police https://www.savannahnow.com/article/20111006/OPINION/310069763 Sawyermade (talk) 04:23, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Already done. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:49, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
     Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:49, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Automated comment: @
      Talk to my owner:Online 02:02, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
      ]

    Handled requests

    A rolling archive of the last seven days of protection requests can be found at

    Wikipedia: Requests for page protection/Rolling archive
    .