User talk:Fico Puricelli/Archives/2021/September

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Welcome!

Hello, Fusionem, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to

talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here
to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Style

Please don't put punctuation (dots) at the end of list items. Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Lists#Bulleted_lists: "As a matter of style, list items should be formatted consistently in either sentence case or lower case. They should not have final punctuation unless they consist of complete sentences." — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 12:40, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Did you read my message? You're doing this again on List of Criminal Minds characters. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 08:44, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, I had no idea about what you read, ma'an. I didn't know it was so serious to anyone. Only expected to anyone to expand that page better than I did. ~~Fusionem~~

I'm sorry, I can hardly understand what you're saying. Is English your second language?
It's not about how "serious" it is, the problem is that someone else is going to have to spend time on fixing your mistakes. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 09:34, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

April 2015

The Blacklist (TV series), as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. - Marchjuly (talk
) 10:06, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

JAG/NCIS universe

Please reconsider your edits regarding

JAG/NCIS universe. There is a point to NCIS (franchise), as NCIS was a spinoff that itself spawned several spinoffs with characters who regularly crossover from one to another but that's not the case with JAG. JAG was a series that had a single spinoff with only minimal crossovers. As such there is no "JAG universe", so a universe article is inappropriate, which is why one has never been created. --AussieLegend (✉
) 03:53, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Please note that I've redirected the article as it is essentially a creation based on

WP:AfD. --AussieLegend (✉
)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:JAG/NCIS

A tag has been placed on Template:JAG/NCIS requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting

here. AussieLegend (✉
) 06:08, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Sourcing with fan site

Please review

WP:RS to understand the scope of sources we can use to source changes to television programs. Ted Danson will join CSI: Cyber in the fall, but that piece of news needs to be sourced to a reliable media source, not to the fan site CSI Files. If you need help with sources, experienced TV editors such as Aussie Legend and I can help. --Drmargi (talk
) 12:34, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Cut-and-paste move

It appears that you have created

WP:RM, and edit the moved article. --AussieLegend (✉
) 13:20, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

But you can try something new for the page, right?
talk
) 18:40, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Notice

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is History merge needed. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 13:29, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at List of The Blacklist episodes. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Davejohnsan (talk) 01:26, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Apparently, I need to review this again. Let's go over it, one edit at at a time.

  1. This edit was reverted per the instructions on {{Infobox television season}}, which establishes that "If no article exists [for the following season], this field should be left blank." You have reinstated this edit three times despite being told an equal number of times about this.
  2. This edit was reverted per
    WP:TVUPCOMING
    , which I have already cited to you.

On a separate note, I should warn you that you are subject to a block as you have reverted more than three edits at

WP:MINOR. Davejohnsan (talk
) 23:30, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Content requires sources

I have reverted your recent edits to

your own personal opinion that it is. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom
23:44, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:JAG/NCIS

A tag has been placed on Template:JAG/NCIS requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting

here. AussieLegend (✉
) 14:20, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at
sandbox
(June 23)

Articles for Creation
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:
We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. Please consider submitting to Wikipedia:Requested articles instead. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MatthewVanitas (talk) 01:22, 23 June 2015 (UTC)


Teahouse logo
Hello! Fusionem, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 01:22, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Sandbox work

Hi Fusionem. I noticed that you seemed to be doing a lot of article editing at

User:Fusionem/sandbox. Happy editing! --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 18:29, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Messengers (TV series), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Deterioration and Suicidal tendencies. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Category:Alternate timeline films

I see that you recently renamed this category to Category:Alternative timeline films. I'm unsure of your rationale, and couldn't find an explanation. In any case, I started a CFD as I believe that either the original name should be restored as the more common phrasing, or the category should be merged given that we already have Category:Alternate history films and Category:Parallel universes in fiction, not to mention Category:Time travel films. The CFD can be found here and I would welcome your input. DonIago (talk) 13:16, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Childrens Hospital (TV series)

This is an automated message from

Childrens Hospital (TV series), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2m7gdy
.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not

talk
) 21:28, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Cut-and-paste move

cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution
. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is

"Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Kolbasz (talk
) 22:04, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at
sandbox
(July 9)

Articles for Creation
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:
This submission provides insufficient
guide to writing better articles
for information on how to better format your submission.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 21:12, 9 July 2015 (UTC)


Teahouse logo
Hello! Fusionem, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 21:12, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at
sandbox
(July 10)

Articles for Creation
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:
This submission provides insufficient
guide to writing better articles
for information on how to better format your submission.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 01:39, 10 July 2015 (UTC)


Teahouse logo
Hello! Fusionem, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 01:39, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

User:Fusionem/sandbox
has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at
User:Fusionem/sandbox. Thanks! — Jeraphine (talk
) 08:37, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Some falafel for you!

For
list of shared universes RobertsBiology (talk
) 18:36, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

List of shared universes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Med. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

July 2015

cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution
. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is

"Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. — Jeraphine (talk
) 05:37, 21 July 2015 (UTC)


Re: your response (now removed), I never said that this is vandalism, it's just a mistake that you've made several times. I'm now concerned that you have still no idea what I'm talking about. Do you understand what a "cut-and-paste move" is on Wikipedia and why we need to avoid doing that? — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 16:11, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at
sandbox
(July 25)

Articles for Creation
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:
This is not an article. Please do not submit your laundry list for review. Only submit things that actually are ready for review as articles.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Fiddle Faddle 08:48, 25 July 2015 (UTC)


Teahouse logo
Hello! Fusionem, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fiddle Faddle 08:48, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at
sandbox
(July 26)

Articles for Creation
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by PotatoNinja was:
Ditto.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
PotatoNinja(Talk to me!) 18:00, 26 July 2015 (UTC)


Teahouse logo
Hello! Fusionem, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! PotatoNinja(Talk to me!) 18:00, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Teahouse Q&A board
. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Happy Squirrel (talk) 16:03, 1 August 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

MfD nomination of
User:Fusionem/sandbox

User:Fusionem/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Sulfurboy (talk
) 02:47, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at
sandbox
(August 3)

Articles for Creation
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:
This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 02:47, 3 August 2015 (UTC)


Teahouse logo
Hello! Fusionem, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 02:47, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rise of Incarnates, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Red Dragon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at
sandbox
(August 6)

Articles for Creation
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jaaron95 was:
Please do not resubmit.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Talk
10:11, 6 August 2015 (UTC)


Teahouse logo
Hello! Fusionem, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the
Talk
10:11, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Universal Monsters characters
added links pointing to Romani and Luke Evans
Mythology in Rick Riordan's works
added links pointing to Chimera and Kronos

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Your sandbox

Your sandbox is a place where you can do more or less what you like, provided that it has some relation to developing the encyclopedia (see WP:User pages). That can include preparing draft pages, or simply notes, to-do-lists, experiments or bits of work-in-progress.

If you click a "submit" button to send it to WP:Articles for creation, you are putting it forward as a suggested article for the main encyclopedia. Because you did that several time with versions which were fine as sandboxes but were clearly not possible encyclopedia articles, your sandbox was nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Fusionem/sandbox. I have just closed that discussion with a decision not to delete the page, but to remove the AfC submission tags and mark it as a plain sandbox.

If in future you use it to prepare a draft article and want to submit that, you have only to add {{subst:submit}} to the top of the page. However, it might save confusion if you keep this for sandbox-type activites and, when you want to draft an article, click on Help:Userspace draft and fill in the title. That will make a draft page for that particular article, with a link to submit it when it is ready.

Regards, JohnCD (talk) 20:58, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at
List of Universal Monsters films
has been accepted

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation
if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Onel5969 TT me 17:47, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at
DC Comics' shared universe on TV
(August 15)

Articles for Creation
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Happysailor was:
This submission is not adequately supported by
Referencing for beginners and Citing sources
.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- Happysailor (Talk) 10:14, 15 August 2015 (UTC)


Teahouse logo
Hello! Fusionem, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! - Happysailor (Talk) 10:14, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: JAG universe (August 17)

Articles for Creation
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:
independent, reliable, published sources
. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Primefac (talk) 12:30, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: JAG universe (August 17)

Articles for Creation
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:
The point has been missed. No one is doubting that these shows all take place in the same universe (though the specific examples added are useful). However, no one is explicitly saying "these are all in the same universe," which is what this draft needs, most likely because they simply take place in the real world. There are already subsections that cover the majority of these crossovers (here, here, and here). If anything, these sections could be expanded by 1/2 sentences, or a crossover table could be made like the one for Law & Order.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Primefac (talk) 17:05, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: NCIS: Red (August 19)

{{subst:Afc decline|full=Draft:NCIS: Red|cv=no|reason=exists|details=NCIS: RED]], [[NCIS:_Los_Angeles#Potential_spin-off|sig=yes}}

My apologies. I did not realize this draft was already accepted until you told me.
talk
) 12:20, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Worlds that SHOULD DO crossover!

This is my point of view because sometimes I can see patterns that open the theories about possible shared universes like these ones.

  • Worlds A: The worlds that officially share one same continuity.
  • Worlds B: Worlds can could potentially co-exist with the ones shown in "Worlds A".
Worlds A Worlds B
Grey's Anatomy
Private Practice 		Scandal
How to Get Away with Murder
The Finder
Sleepy Hollow
 Backstrom
Homeland Tyrant
The Following Stalker
Blindspot
Arrow
The Flash
Constantine
Vixen
Legends of Tomorrow
Supergirl
Lucifer
The Blacklist
Game of Silence

What's your point of view?

talk
) 12:18, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

August 2015

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 08:17, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

And exactly which link should I ask my question?
talk
) 23:11, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: InterWorld (series) has been accepted

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation
if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Onel5969 TT me 22:57, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
I wanna tell ya there are still a few drafts that I need to be reviewed. Thanks.
talk
) 23:36, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at
DC Comics' shared universe television series
(August 27)

Articles for Creation
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kikichugirl was:
This submission is not adequately supported by
Referencing for beginners and Citing sources
.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
— kikichugirl oh hello! 05:46, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: JAG universe (August 27)

Articles for Creation
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:
Primefac hits the nail on the head. These shows take place in the real world. Unlike franchises like Buffy/Angel, or Marvel characters, or Star Trek, etc., there are nothing special which sets this universe apart. According to the methodology behind this, every show which takes place in the real world belongs in this category. Primefac's suggestion about the crossover mentions is the way to go.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 22:57, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Endgame (series) (August 29)

Articles for Creation
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:
This submission is not adequately supported by
Referencing for beginners and Citing sources
.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 21:46, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: JAG universe (September 5)

Articles for Creation
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kikichugirl was:
This submission is not adequately supported by
Referencing for beginners and Citing sources
.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
— kikichugirl oh hello! 00:17, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: JAG universe (September 7)

Articles for Creation
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:
The series in this article take place in the "real world." There is no "JAG Universe" any more than there is a "CSI Universe" or a "Law & Order Universe." If you want to add information about the crossovers to the articles listed in this draft, then by all means do so, but I see absolutely zero reason to have a standalone article that does little more than provide that crossover information.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Primefac (talk) 01:20, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at
DC Television Universe
(September 17)

Articles for Creation
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Callmemirela was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the
reliable sources
that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 01:32, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Cut-and-paste move

cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution
. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is

"Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. The1337gamer (talk
) 17:10, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: JAG (franchise) (October 2)

Articles for Creation
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at NCIS (franchise) instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Primefac (talk) 13:46, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Multiverse (DC Comics), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marvel. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at
DC Comics on TV
has been accepted

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation
if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 05:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk
) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Tribulation Force (group)
added links pointing to Jonas, Stefan, The Remnant and Nicolae
Left Behind (film series)
added a link pointing to Brad Johnson
Universal Monsters Cinematic Universe
added a link pointing to Dracula (1931 film)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Endgame (series) (December 3)

Articles for Creation
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the
reliable sources
that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 06:12, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Endgame (series) (December 6)

Articles for Creation
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:
You're not understanding the kind of sourcing we need: we don't want you to source the books themselves, we want you to cite books or articles by other people that discuss this book series and its impact. Things like professional reviews in serious media (not amateur/blog/Amazon reviews), news articles about the social impact of the series, etc. See WP:Notability (books) for guidelines.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MatthewVanitas (talk) 10:48, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: JAG-NCIS universe (December 8)

Articles for Creation
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:
This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in
notable
and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If no additional reliable sources can be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 23:51, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:JAG-NCIS universe

sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:JAG-NCIS universe during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Primefac (talk
) 01:16, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Team Indie

The article Team Indie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

give reliable sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Avengers 01:30, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Team Indie

The article Team Indie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the

Merry Christmas!: ...And a Happy New Year!
) 19:58, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mythology of Sense8

The article

Mythology of Sense8 has been proposed for deletion
because of the following concern:

Entirely in-universe fiction with no demonstrated
WP:FAN content that belongs at http://sense8.wikia.com/wiki/Sense8_Wiki
or elsewhere.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Animalparty! (talk) 23:27, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Endgame (series) (December 31)

Articles for Creation
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RadioFan was:
This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in
notable
and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
RadioFan (talk) 03:59, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

January 2016

cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution
. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is

"Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. — TAnthonyTalk
22:46, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

You appear to have been warned about cut-and-paste moves before, please do not do this again.— TAnthonyTalk 22:47, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution
. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is

"Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. — TAnthonyTalk
04:06, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

Universal Monsters Cinematic Universe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Hurlbut. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Invisible Man (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Morgan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

Universal Monsters Cinematic Universe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Luke Evans. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:11, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

The Void (virtual reality)

Hello, I'm here about an article you've created. The summary reads awfully

violate copyright, so we are probably going to have to rewrite it entirely. It would be great if you could give some suggestions and if you have any additional sources. I'm also wondering if the alternative capitalization THE VOID is worth mentioning in the article. Thanks, Me, Myself & I (☮) (talk
) 02:41, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of
Alien-Predator universe
for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Alien-Predator universe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted
.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alien-Predator universe until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

talk•cont
22:56, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

August 2016

cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution
. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is

talk
) 09:42, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:Rom the Spaceknight (November 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
AFC is not for the review of templates. If you want review of a template, you may ask at
the Help Desk
.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 15:39, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016
: Voting now open!

Hello, Fusionem. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Rom (comics)

Hi, I'm just curious about your edit summary here - what do you mean by "The page has been reviewed" - where, by who, and with what resulting commentary?

I can't find anything over at

WP:COMIC and the associated sub-projects, and the only possible assessment/review I can find on the talk page is a B-class request which confirms the article status as primarily a comic, not a toy. Chaheel Riens (talk
) 12:42, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

My apologies for this stuff, but the real problem is how to difference the toy from the comics, more specially when there are two comic book versions of the same character, coming from Marvel Comics and IDW Publishing If you know how to do it better than what I did, I would appreciate your concern. Thanks.
No, the real problem is that you keep C&P moving pages despite being told not to multiple times.
If you think different regarding "toy" or "comic", present your arguments over at the talk page. I have no real opinion, so am willing to be convinced that the current suffix should be changed. From reading the article it does suggest that the toy came first, and then the comic came to promote the toy - that would seem to support the fact that the primary meaning is (toy) not (comic), but I'm not really that bothered either way. Chaheel Riens (talk) 19:27, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
What if the page should be splitted into two and named Rom (Marvel Comics) and Rom (IDW Publishing)?
talk
) 05:47, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
I don't think there's enough meat in the article to warrant two different ones. This conversation would probably be better placed over at the ROM talk page, btw. Chaheel Riens (talk) 08:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at
Hanna-Barbera Beyond
(December 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in
notable
and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
See
WP:TOOSOON
. There is little evidence at this time that this initiative, still mostly scheduled, is notable.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 18:50, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 8 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

false positive, you can report it to my operator
. Thanks,
talk
) 00:27, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at
Hasbro Universe
(December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in
notable
and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Additional sources not associated with Hasbro or IDW are needed to establish notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 05:45, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Hasbro Reconstruction
has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at
Draft:Hasbro Reconstruction. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk
22:57, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Hanna-Barbera Beyond
has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at
Draft:Hanna-Barbera Beyond. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk
04:35, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at
Kirby: Genesis
(December 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:
This submission is not adequately supported by
Referencing for beginners and Citing sources
.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
There are no
independent sources
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 10:40, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Kirby: Genesis
has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at
Draft:Kirby: Genesis. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk
22:51, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Gold Key: Alliance
has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at
Draft:Gold Key: Alliance. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk
03:04, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at
Infestation 2
(December 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in
notable
and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This specifically needs all news and reviews.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 04:57, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at
Infestation 2
(December 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Amortias was:
This submission is not adequately supported by
Referencing for beginners and Citing sources
.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The articles sourcing all appears to be previews of the comic itself, we would need significant coverage once it was released to show that it meets the criteria for
notability
Also there appear to be two unnecessary heading at the bottom of the page.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Amortias (T)(C) 22:31, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016

Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing
13:30, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Kings Watch
has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at
Draft:Kings Watch. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk
15:31, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at
Hasbro Reconstruction
(December 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in
notable
and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 20:30, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Transformers: Prime Wars Trilogy has been accepted

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation
if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Cerebellum (talk) 21:24, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gold Key: Alliance has been accepted

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation
if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Cerebellum (talk) 20:55, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Infestation 2 has been accepted

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation
if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Cerebellum (talk) 21:43, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kings Watch has been accepted

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation
if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Cerebellum (talk) 21:47, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Comics articles

Hey there Fusionem! Good job on the comics articles! I just wanted to give you some feedback on them. Your work is really well-formatted and the for the most part your drafts are notable. You just need to find articles or reviews on the comics in order to show that they meet the notability criteria, like the ones I added to Kings Watch and Infestation 2. Some good sites to look at are Comic Book Resources (though the previews do not show notability, only independent interviews or articles), ComicsAlliance, Bleeding Cool, Newsarama, and Comics Bulletin. There's a longer list at Wikipedia:WikiProject Comics/References.

If you get a chance, see if you can't find some better sources for

Draft:Kirby: Genesis. Best of luck, and let me know if you have any questions! --Cerebellum (talk
) 21:58, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello, and thank you. Right now, I have another draft in mind:
talk
) 02:16, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Sense8

talk
) 16:07, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Hasbro Reconstruction

talk
) 16:21, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at
Kirby: Genesis
(January 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:
This submission is not adequately supported by
Referencing for beginners and Citing sources
.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
While you have proven that this actually exists, you still have not addressed how it meets our notability criteria. Please see
WP:GNG
.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 13:20, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hasbro Universe has been accepted

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation
if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

» Shadowowl | talk 17:04, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Cut & Paste move - again

You've been told many, many, many times that C&P is not the way to do page moves. Your talk page is littered (

4
) with warnings about doing this - and yet here you are again doing exactly the same thing.

Please try to learn from what people are telling you, before another

conclusion is reached. Chaheel Riens (talk
) 18:44, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Then try to teach me how is the right way, because the manner you're telling me now has been meaningless to me.
talk
) 21:38, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
I've just scanned your talk page, and can see at least six different attempts to teach you how to move a page correctly:

cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution
. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is

"Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge
. Thank you.

If you still don't understand - stop trying, and post at Wikipedia:Requested moves - again as instructed in the six different requests currently on your talk page. Chaheel Riens (talk) 17:25, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:NCIS: Red

Hello, Fusionem. It has been over six months since you last edited your

Articles for Creation draft article submission, "NCIS: Red
".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission
and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

this link
. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 10:59, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at
First Strike (IDW Publishing)
(April 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in
notable
and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This draft has only one reference. Multiple references are strongly encouraged. Since this is a future release, see
WP:TOOSOON
.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 02:18, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: First Strike (IDW Publishing) has been accepted

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation
if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 05:01, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at
Lion Forge Comics
(May 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ProgrammingGeek was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in
notable
and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
ProgrammingGeek talktome 17:49, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Infestation 2) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Infestation 2, Fusionem!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This article needs to establish notability with reliable third party sources. It also needs to give clarity as to what it actually is. You may know what a crossover event is, but this is an encyclopaedia, trying to help people understand notable topics. If you can address these issues, the article will stand more of a chance or remaining in main space. Thanks.

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about

page curation
.

Nick Moyes (talk) 08:38, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at
The Sovereigns
(June 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in
notable
and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Third-party sources are needed to establish notability of the comic series.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 01:55, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at
Lion Forge Comics
(June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eddie891 was:
This submission is not adequately supported by
Referencing for beginners and Citing sources
.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
would greatly benefit from citations on every crew member, every imprint, every comic book series.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Eddie891 (talk) 10:41, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dark Universe Banner, 2017.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Sovereigns has been accepted

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation
if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Cerebellum (talk) 01:15, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

November 2017

Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. KGirl (Wanna chat?)
21:53, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at
Sonic the Hedgehog (IDW Publishing)
(November 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KGirlTrucker81 was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published,
notable
and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KGirl (Wanna chat?) 21:55, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Fusionem. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at
Sonic the Hedgehog (IDW Publishing)
(December 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KJP1 was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published,
notable
and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
There are two cites, both PR releases from IDW Publishing. IDW is, in one sense, the article's subject, as they are to publish the comics. Therefore the sources do not give reliable, independent, third-party coverage of the subject's notability. Nor are there enough of them. Also, as the series has yet to be published, I'd suggest the article is premature as you can't write anything on content/reaction/reception etc., as there hasn't been any. And it is, of course, possible that the series won't happen.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
    Draft:Sonic the Hedgehog (IDW Publishing)
    and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
    db-self
    }}" at the top of the draft text and save.
  • If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
  • You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
KJP1 (talk) 07:34, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Tales of Arcadia

Hi, thanks for creating

WP:GNG, and looks ready to be moved into mainspace as an article. Do you want to make the move, or, if not, would you object if I did? Cheers. ‑‑YodinT
19:29, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

It's OK for me. Do it.
talk
) 00:16, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks, and hope you keep on writing articles! ‑‑YodinT 10:59, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Cut and paste move

Hi, I wanted to explain why I reverted your edits.

consensus on whether it should be moved properly. Thanks. JOEBRO64
02:02, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Sonic the Hedgehog (IDW Publishing)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Sonic the Hedgehog (IDW Publishing), Fusionem!

Wikipedia editor Lee Vilenski just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Great work on Sonic The Hedgehog!

To reply, leave a comment on Lee Vilenski's talk page.

Learn more about

page curation
.

Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:05, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

List of The House of the Dead characters moved to draftspace

An article you recently created,

talk
) 01:20, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at
G.I. Joe: Ever Vigilant
has been accepted

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation
if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 00:41, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at
sandbox
(May 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Not clear what this is about?
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
    User:Savant-Man/sandbox
    and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
    db-self
    }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
  • If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
  • You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Theroadislong (talk) 17:04, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Transformers: Unicron has been accepted

Transformers: Unicron, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation
if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 14:35, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

May 2018

Copyright problem icon One of your recent additions has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 20:04, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

My apologies. It's because I don't know how to write a much shorter premise for some episode. I thought someone else could do it better than me. Anyway, thanks for this reminder.
talk
) 05:09, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Catalyst Prime (May 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published,
notable
and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Legacypac (talk) 22:19, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of The House of the Dead characters (May 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:
This submission is not adequately supported by
Referencing for beginners and Citing sources
.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Legacypac (talk) 17:46, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Transformers Unicron Issue 0, IDW Publishing, Mar 2018.jpg

talk
) 17:26, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at
Optimus Prime (comic book)
(August 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help
). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The Reception section is missing, but it is the Reception section that lists what others have written about the comic book, which is what determines notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 02:30, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at
Power Rangers (Boom! Studios)
(August 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help
). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
See
book notability
. The Reception section is missing, but the Reception section is what reports on what others have said, which is what determines notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 02:33, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at
Power Rangers (Boom! Studios)
(August 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help
). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Has failed to address previous comments which relate to Wikipedia policy.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 11:42, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Shattered Grid
has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at
Draft:Shattered Grid. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk
) 22:58, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Optimus Prime (comics) has been accepted

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation
if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

talk
) 16:38, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Optimus Prime (comics)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Optimus Prime (comics), Aspie Puricelli!

Wikipedia editor Doomsdayer520 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for developing the new article on Optimus Prime (comics), and for working with the reviewers during the draft process.

To reply, leave a comment on Doomsdayer520's talk page.

Learn more about

page curation
.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:23, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Optimus Prime N° 1 Cover, IDW Publishing, December 2016.jpg

talk
) 18:01, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Aspie Puricelli. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Aspie Puricelli. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at
Bakugan: Battle Planet
(December 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help
). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This draft reads like a promotional blurb. This draft does not satisfy
television notability
because it needs evidence of notability such as reviews or independent coverage.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 15:50, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Non-existent categories

Hi F. E. Puricelli

Please do not place an article in a non-existent category, as you did in this edit[1] when you placed Optimus Prime (comics) in Category:Articles created via the Article Wizard.

That category was deleted at

WP:REDNOT, that it is an error. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs
) 03:28, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

If this is true, I was in the dark. But thank you, anyway.
talk
) 15:02, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Transformers (2019 comic book) has been accepted

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation
if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The Drover's Wife (talk) 09:07, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at
The New Age of DC Heroes
(February 28)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Dan arndt was: undefined
Dan arndt (talk) 06:51, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

March 2019

Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liancetalk/contribs
14:10, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Doomsday Clock characters has been accepted

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation
if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Stevey7788 (talk) 21:59, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at
sandbox
(April 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Not a draft article?
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
    User:F. E. Puricelli/sandbox
    and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
    db-self
    }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
  • If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
    will be deleted
    .
  • If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Theroadislong (talk) 08:39, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

File:The New Age of DC Heroes official logo, DC Comics, Nov 2017.jpg

talk
) 17:07, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019

ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits
) @ 05:05, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at
Bootleg Multiverse
has been accepted

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation
if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

 
ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits
) @ 05:35, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Event Leviathan (April 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Praxidicae was:
This submission is not adequately supported by
Referencing for beginners and Citing sources
.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Praxidicae (talk) 19:43, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at
Wizards: Tales of Arcadia
(April 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid
when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Too soon to write a separate article. Wait until first episode title is announced and reviewed.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 12:35, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Tales of Arcadia characters has been accepted

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation
if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Stevey7788 (talk) 14:54, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Moving pages

We do not copy and paste page moves, as you did at

Draft:Dark Universe (film studio). Get consensus first and then ask an administrator to move the page. Copying-and-pasting the page to the desired target, and the redirect to the current page, is highly disruptive. DarkKnight2149
04:23, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Thank you but how am I supposed to do that? It seems there is option to ask an administrator about that Or is it?
talk
) 04:36, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
If the move has been discussed on the Talk Page, you can ask an administrator to move the page. DarkKnight2149 06:36, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Thanks

for helping Draft:Magic: The Gathering (TV series). Motizun (talk) 17:52, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

You're welcome. I'm curious about several trademarks, like Marvel, or even Hasbro. You can count on me on a few things, but not all of them. Anyway, I'm honored.
talk
) 19:30, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at
Transformers: Galaxies
(June 25)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Dan arndt was: undefined
Dan arndt (talk) 08:09, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at
G.I. Joe (2019 comic book)
(June 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid
when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This is very potentially notable, however, a mere two references in specialty media fails to crest the standards of
WP:SIGCOV
.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Chetsford (talk) 23:24, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Draft:H1 (comics)

Wow, "sir", huh? For a second there, I had to look behind me to see if you were addressing my father! :-)

Your draft on H1 looks like it's off to a good start. I don't really think that how much I or anyone else knows about Waid matters, since the criterion for notability (both

coverage of the topic outside of Wikipedia in reliable sources. Since you've racked up over 13,000 edits here since 2015, I'm guessing you're familiar with this. So just look for coverage of H1 in the industry press, and even in the mainstream press, so that you beef up the Publication history section, since that's probably going to form the bulk of the article body's content. Nightscream (talk
) 02:34, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

It is done. You can check it again.
talk
) 17:31, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at
Necessary Evil (comics)
(July 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:
This submission is not adequately supported by
Referencing for beginners and Citing sources
.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Likely notable. Half of the article is unsourced. Please add references from
reliable and independent
sources and resubmit it for review.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hitro talk 12:22, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: G.I. Joe (2019 comic book) has been accepted

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation
if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 07:34, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019

Copyright problem icon Your addition to List of Darksiders characters has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. MrClog (talk) 22:15, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about List of Darksiders characters

Hello, F. E. Puricelli,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username MrClog and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, List of Darksiders characters should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Darksiders characters .

You might like to note that such

our guide
about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MrClog}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

MrClog (talk) 22:18, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:10, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Thanks for creating

Transformers Aligned Continuity
.

page curation process
had the following comments:

Please add reliable references to the article.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|QueerEcofeminist}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 18:27, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at
AWA Studios
(August 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid
when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 11:08, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Draft:AWA Studios
has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at
Draft:AWA Studios. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk
) 19:38, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Year of the Villain

Hi, re your request for help with this article, perhaps @BOZ: can help ?

Draft:AWA Studios
has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at
Draft:AWA Studios. Thanks! Atlantic306 (talk
) 16:56, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Reference

Hi, ref 3 is still incorrect, it goes to the same page as ref 2 Atlantic306 (talk) 17:22, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

You weere right. I wasnt' Newsarama, but ComicBook.com. Now it is corrected. I got distracted that I couldn't see the smaller details. Thank you, anyway.
talk
) 17:30, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: AWA Studios has been accepted

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation
if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Atlantic306 (talk) 17:38, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at
Polarity (company)
(August 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by RoySmith were:
This submission is not adequately supported by
independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid
when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Sourced to a press release, and to Forbes Contributor (see
WP:FORBES
for details). In general, one year old companies with employees numbered in the 10's are almost never notable.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-- RoySmith (talk) 20:47, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Contentless sections

Hi F. E. Puricelli, I noticed in

MOS:BODY. Sections can be added when content is available. Thanks... --IamNotU (talk
) 19:56, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

I need help with this article. If you know someone who does, I'd be grateful.
talk
) 20:26, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019

Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liancetalk/contribs
04:56, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2020 comics debuts

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion
, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 01:37, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2020 comics debuts

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion
, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:41, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

OK. Delete it.
talk
) 02:30, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at
Dark Universe (film studio)
has been accepted

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation
if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Vinegarymass911 (talk) 08:09, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Category:Rom the Spaceknight

Just a friendly heads up on the category Rom the Spaceknight. You could have done this yourself -- change the categories on the pages that were in the old spelling, then move the category page to the correct spelling. If the redirect left behind bothered you, you could have then marked it as an empty category for deletion.----Fabrictramp | talk to me 16:13, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at
G.I. Joe: A Real American Hero (IDW Publishing)
(September 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:
This submission is not adequately supported by
Referencing for beginners and Citing sources
.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Gbawden (talk) 11:53, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019

Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liancetalk/contribs
14:05, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Valaverse (September 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid
when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails
WP:CORPDEPTH. The company's website is a primary source
- needs significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 01:49, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2020 comics endings

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion
, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:07, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mime and Marionette (September 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid
when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails
WP:GNG - requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources. DC Comics is a primary source
.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 06:15, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Mime and Marionette

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://pemilusydney.org.au/in/mystic-ink-the-mystic-series-book-1.php. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing
.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dan arndt (talk) 06:16, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:Mime and Marionette

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

The page

section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from http://pemilusydney.org.au/in/mystic-ink-the-mystic-series-book-1.php. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing
.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

Wikipedia:Deletion Review Justlettersandnumbers (talk
) 19:18, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Thanks for creating PlayStation Productions.

page curation process
had the following comments:

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bishal Shrestha}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bishal Shrestha (talk) 06:09, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Sorry for no talking to you. I was busy. But.. your're welcome. However, I need lot of help with this article.
talk
) 12:05, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

October 2019

Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liancetalk/contribs
06:20, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bat in the Sun Productions (October 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid
when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:31, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, F. E. Puricelli

Thank you for creating Rom: Dire Wraiths.

page curation process
, had the following comments:

Thank you for this new article. Be sure to expand it with pro reviews and the like as the title reaches its publication date.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:35, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Publication history of crossover events in comic books moved to draftspace

An article you recently created,

general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me
20:57, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Doomsday Clock characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barry Allen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:19, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk
) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of BumiLangit

Hello, F. E. Puricelli

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Ubiquity and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve

relevant criterion. The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now visible at the top of the article
.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

  1. Edit the page
  2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. Click the Publish changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on

other means
.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Ubiquity}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

ubiquity (talk) 16:25, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Polarity (company)

Hello, F. E. Puricelli,

Thank you for creating Polarity (company).

page curation process
and note that:

Thank you for your new article on the Polarity company. Note that many of the sources currently used in the article are about Lion Forge, and some more is needed on any notice that this new company has received on its own.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the

Teahouse
.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 16:00, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to [email protected], so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at [email protected].

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Valaverse for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Valaverse is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valaverse until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PK650 (talk) 00:49, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Do it, but please, do not delete the Valaverse section in the Action Force article. This is all I ask. 🇦🇷 03:02, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at
Magic: The Gathering (comics)
(December 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Willsome429 was:
This submission is not adequately supported by
Referencing for beginners and Citing sources
.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
First saga still needs sources to increase strength of the page.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 15:27, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at
Acquisition of Entertainment One by Hasbro
(January 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Entertainment One. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
    Draft:Acquisition of Entertainment One by Hasbro
    and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
    db-self
    }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
  • If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
    may be deleted
    .
  • If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Dan arndt (talk) 03:36, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Page move

I undid your move. The company was not called "NBCUniversal" until the purchase by Comcast was completed. ViperSnake151  Talk  15:20, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Dawn of X and House of X and Powers of X

Hey, there. I was going to close the merge discussion since nobody has added anything in a month now, but before I do, I wanted to see if you had any thoughts since you did try to merge them. Do you truly think that they should be one article, or did you just want to get the merge tags off of the pages? Thanks, 2pou (talk) 18:58, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Now that I think about it, the answer would be "no". I guess I just acted by impulse, and I apologies. However, we need to expanse the premise of the Dawn of X article; a major storyline is being told. 🇦🇷 02:03, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Transformers: Galaxies (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Cybertron
Transformers (2019 comic book) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Cybertron

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at
Digimon Adventure Ψ
(January 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid
when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
See
the notability guidelines on unreleased films
, which are seldom notable.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 03:49, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at
Digimon Adventure: Psi
(January 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid
when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Still needs more sources to show notability - it probably will be notable, but may just be
WP:TOOSOON
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 18:30, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of List of The Blacklist characters for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of The Blacklist characters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The Blacklist characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Natg 19 (talk) 19:08, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at
Iron Man 2020 (comic book)
(January 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid
when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This draft does not satisfy
reliable sources
.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 16:49, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

February 2020

Copyright problem icon Your addition to Publication history of Marvel Comics crossover events‎‎ has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 11:38, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Generation (comics) has been accepted

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation
if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 02:08, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at
Transformers/My Little Pony: Friendship in Disguise!
has been accepted

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation
if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 14:46, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Transformers: War for Cybertron Trilogy (TV series) (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by WikiAviator were:
This submission is not adequately supported by
independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid
when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
WikiAviator (talk) 04:23, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Transformers: Siege (February 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid
when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Not enough here yet to establish notability. Likely a case of
WP:TOOSOON
. This will for sure become notable once the show releases.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 15:07, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Iron Man 2020 draft

Hi. I have been helping out in your draft for the Iron Man 2020 arc by adding in some plot information and adding to the concealed Infobox. If we are to get the draft accepted, we need to make it so that the requirements are filled including the reception. I just wanted to let you know that. --Rtkat3 (talk) 16:05, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

It is done. And thank you for everything you've been doing. 🇦🇷 18:35, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Category:Rom the Spaceknight has been nominated for discussion

Category:Rom the Spaceknight, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. 2pou (talk) 22:09, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at
Outlawed (comics)
(March 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Outlawed (comics) instead.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
There is already an article in article space, Outlawed (comics), that is the same as this draft. There are questions as to whether it satisfies notability, because it is scheduled for future publication. If the article is kept, this draft should be converted into a redirect to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for later use.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 17:24, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Bat in the Sun Productions concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bat in the Sun Productions, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request

Userfication
of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

WP:REFUND/G13
.

Thank you for your attention.

talk
) 01:32, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at
The Resistance (AWA Studios)
(April 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid
when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Not enough here to denote notability. What would help the most is to see reviews from notable critics.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 21:02, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Red Border (April 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid
when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 21:17, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at
The Resistance (AWA Studios)
(April 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid
when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
To show notability, reviewers or the websites they write for should ideally have articles on Wikipedia already, or otherwise be demonstrably professional and reputed sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
— Bilorv (talk) 15:12, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Bad Mother

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created,

welcome page
if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. TheImaCow (talk
) 09:53, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Into the future

i working on a draft and wondering if u want to help out you can find it at Draft:Future Quest Presents Fanoflionking 10:49, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Publication history of crossover events in comic books concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Publication history of crossover events in comic books, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request

Userfication
of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

WP:REFUND/G13
.

Thank you for your attention.

talk
) 01:37, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Publication history of crossover events in comic books

Hello, F. E. Puricelli. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Publication history of crossover events in comic books
".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission
and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

this link
. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:46, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Submit Iron Man 2020 draft?

@

Draft:Iron Man 2020 (comic book) page. The initial AfC decline reason was for the lack of a reception/real-world content. That seems to have been addressed a long time ago, so I was curious if you felt it was ready to submit again. I recommend submitting again sooner than later since the more recent updates I've seen are to the plot, and at this rate the weight of the article will be too heavy on plot as opposed to the reception. Happy editing! -2pou (talk
) 19:58, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Well F. E., would now be the opportunity to resubmit the draft at the suggestion of the editor who asked this question? --Rtkat3 (talk) 14:58, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

No worries, I've already done it.

talk
) 17:17, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

New DC and Marvel Drafts

I can help you with the draft for Perpetua while adding her abilities and reference, but we need to get a draft in for World Forger. Like the

Monitor and the Anti-Monitor, he is a child of Perpetua. As for the ones from Marvel Comics, I will see what I can do when we arrive at their first releases. --Rtkat3 (talk
) 14:55, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Oh, thank you. I owe you one. Here it is... (
talk
) 15:48, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
I forgot about Barbatos from
talk
) 21:24, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
I added what I could to Perpetua and World Forger, but they both have to be made to look website worthy like Monitor and Anti-Monitor like the Iron Man 2020 draft that you resubmitted. As for Barbatos, someone made an article for it only to be merged. If you don't believe me, look at that page's history. --Rtkat3 (talk) 14:32, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
No worries. I already know. It was worth the try. Thanks, anyway.
talk
) 15:41, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Perpetua (comics) (July 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ReaderofthePack was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid
when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This needs non-primary sourcing to establish notability - the character doesn't inherit notability by being part of a notable series or universe.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:36, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Comics draft

Hi. I would like to apologize for the fact that your draft for Perpetua was rejected. If you want to have the drafts for her and World Forger to be improved, you can look for notable reference and even ask help from other people like Jhenderson777 and Toughpigs to further modify it. As for your draft for the "Iron Man 2020" event, it is still being re-reviewed. --Rtkat3 (talk) 15:01, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

comic drafts

Thanks for the feedback. I will see if I can help. though it's been awhile that I been on comic book related stuff. Jhenderson 777 23:30, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Thank you so much, and I alsmot forgot another draft...
talk
) 00:21, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: G.I. Joe: A Real American Hero (IDW Publishing) has been accepted

G.I. Joe: A Real American Hero (IDW Publishing), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 08:09, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Bat in the Sun Productions

Hello, F. E. Puricelli. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bat in the Sun Productions
".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission
and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

this link
. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:55, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at
DC Animated Movie Universe (2020–present)
(August 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at DC Animated Movie Universe. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 07:27, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at
Transformers: Escape
(September 17)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Dan arndt was: undefined
Dan arndt (talk) 01:45, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Draft:X of Swords
has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at
Draft:X of Swords. Thanks! Noahfgodard (talk
) 20:35, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at
World Forger
(September 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SL93 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid
when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
No notability shown per
WP:N
. All references are to the source material.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SL93 (talk) 23:12, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: X of Swords has been accepted

X of Swords, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– bradv🍁 21:34, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at
List of Digimon Adventure (2020 TV series) characters
(September 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid
when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Separate articles for TV characters are only created when there is substantial reliable source commentary on the characters e.g. if there is a body of critical literature (from newspapers or journals) analysing the characters and/or a substantial amount of detail about the characters' inspirations or other behind-the-scenes info from the creators, widely covered in secondary sources. Wikipedia is not the place for a list of all characters of a show (try Wikia, with no notability requirements for fan content).
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
— Bilorv (talk) 22:37, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at
Iron Man 2020 (comic book)
(October 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nightenbelle was:
This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
While the sources have been greatly improved- the article has way to much plot summary.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nightenbelle (talk) 17:06, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Comic drafts-related

Hi. I apologize for the fact that the Iron Man 2020 draft was rejected due to mass plot section. Do you suppose that the sections for the subplots should go? Also, there is a draft for the Batman: Three Jokers page if you would like to help out with it. --Rtkat3 (talk) 15:19, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. I'll be on touch. Anyway, I guess we have to "re-order" everything. I also have new drafts based on Transformers '84, Transformers vs. the Terminator, Transformers/Back to the Future and Transformers/Ghostbusters.
talk
) 15:39, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Old Haunts

Hello, F. E. Puricelli. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Old Haunts
".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission
and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

this link
. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:37, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Red Border

Hello, F. E. Puricelli. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Red Border
".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission
and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

this link
. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 13:29, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at
List of Digimon Adventure (2020 TV series) characters
(October 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Snowycats was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid
when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Read the previous comment. The content on this page doesn't quite fit what we're after here at Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Snowycats (talk) 18:48, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Transformers vs. The Terminator has been accepted

Transformers vs. The Terminator, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Bilorv (talk) 12:12, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at
Transformers: Back to the Future
has been accepted

Transformers: Back to the Future
, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Delta fiver (talk) (UTC) 11:38, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at
Transformers-Ghostbusters
(October 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Snowycats was:
This submission is not adequately supported by
Referencing for beginners and Citing sources
.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
heavy reliance on one source
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Snowycats (talk) 03:57, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at
Transformers-Ghostbusters
(October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Snowycats was:
This submission is not adequately supported by
Referencing for beginners and Citing sources
.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
issue persists
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Snowycats (talk) 02:21, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at
Transformers '84
(October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Snowycats was:
This submission is not adequately supported by
Referencing for beginners and Citing sources
.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
heavy reliance on one source
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Snowycats (talk) 06:19, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of
Bootleg Multiverse
for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Bootleg Multiverse, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted
.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bootleg Multiverse until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crossover (Image Comics) has been accepted

Crossover (Image Comics), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

2pou (talk) 23:41, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Crossover (2020 comic book)
has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at
Draft:Crossover (2020 comic book). Thanks! 2pou (talk
) 23:29, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Tales of Arcadia cast members has been accepted

List of Tales of Arcadia cast members, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

✉
) 16:38, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Generation Zero Gods Among Us, DC Comics, February 2020.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

King in Black draft

Hi. I am letting you know that I was able to contribute to the "King in Black" draft that you started. If you think that there is enough for the article to be created as a preparation for the storyline's upcoming release, feel free to submit it for approval. --Rtkat3 (talk) 18:15, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk
) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

King in Black draft 2

In light of the first issue of "King in Black" coming out, I was able to add information on it. Feel free to submit the draft. --Rtkat3 (talk) 16:57, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you, and sorry for writing you back before, as I was busy. Fico Puricelli (talk) 17:16, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
Somebody already started a page when the draft is still up. I'm just letting you know this setback because the person who started it didn't notice the draft notice. --Rtkat3 (talk) 15:34, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Nathan2055talk - contribs
00:25, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Transformers '84: Secrets & Lies
has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at
Draft:Transformers '84: Secrets & Lies. Thanks! 2pou (talk
) 17:30, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Unlimited Power (comics) has been accepted

Unlimited Power (comics), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Primefac (talk) 23:18, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rorschach (comic book) has been accepted

Rorschach (comic book), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 03:51, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at
Iron Man 2020 (comic book)
(January 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eternal Shadow was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid
when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Plot section remains way too large, and the article does not indicate notability based off the sources either.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Eternal Shadow Talk 17:46, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Transformers: Escape
moved to draftspace

An article you recently created,

general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Fiddle Faddle
11:25, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at
Transformers: Escape
(February 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid
when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
We require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, and in
WP:SELFPUB
which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact referred to, that meet these tough criteria is likely to make this draft a clear acceptance (0.9 probability). Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Fiddle Faddle 11:26, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Transformers Escape, issue 1, cover A, IDW Publishing, October 2020.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:07, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Transformers '84: Secrets & Lies has been accepted

Transformers '84: Secrets & Lies, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

2pou (talk) 21:21, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Transformers: Escape
has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at
Draft:Transformers: Escape. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk
) 05:17, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Bootleg Multiverse

article space
.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

userfication
of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

here
.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk
) 05:01, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding
Draft:Archangel 8

article space
.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

userfication
of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

here
.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk
) 23:01, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding
Draft:Hotell (comics)

article space
.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

userfication
of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

here
.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk
) 01:05, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding
Draft:World Forger

article space
.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

userfication
of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

here
.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk
) 23:01, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Magic: The Gathering (comics)
has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at
Draft:Magic: The Gathering (comics). Thanks! Cerebellum (talk
) 16:22, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

@Cerebellum: The script may have hung up. It doesnt look like a comment got added. -2pou (talk) 16:55, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

@2pou: Oh dear! I think it is a problem with my internet connection, can't get the comment to post. Here is what I was going to say: all of the content seems to be copied from Multiverse (Magic: The Gathering)#Comics titles. Why do we need a separate article? --Cerebellum (talk) 17:15, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Transformers: Escape
has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at
Draft:Transformers: Escape. Thanks! 2pou (talk
) 17:10, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Transformers/Ghostbusters has been accepted

Transformers/Ghostbusters, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Bilorv (talk) 19:50, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding
Draft:Year Zero (comics)

article space
.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

userfication
of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

here
.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk
) 16:30, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at
Ultraman (comic book)
(May 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid
when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
— Bilorv (talk) 23:57, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at
Transformers-My Little Pony: The Magic of Cybertron
(May 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.
closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here
.
You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. KylieTastic (talk) 16:36, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at
List of Hasbro Comic Book Universe chraracters
(May 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was:
This submission is not adequately supported by
Referencing for beginners and Citing sources
.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curbon7 (talk) 22:44, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at
Magic: The Gathering (comics)
(June 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bjelleklang was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid
when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Bjelleklang - talk 21:32, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Transformers: Escape has been accepted

Transformers: Escape, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 02:49, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Saturday AM (magazine)
has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at
Draft:Saturday AM (magazine). Thanks! TheBirdsShedTears (talk
) 10:49, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Saturday AM (magazine)
has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at
Draft:Saturday AM (magazine). Thanks! TheBirdsShedTears (talk
) 11:17, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saturday AM (magazine) has been accepted

Saturday AM (magazine), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 11:25, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Transformers: King Grimlock
has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at
Draft:Transformers: King Grimlock. Thanks! AntanO
05:44, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at
Milestone Returns
(July 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sionk was:
This submission is not adequately supported by
Referencing for beginners and Citing sources
.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Seems to be cited to blogs and non-reliable sources
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sionk (talk) 22:49, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at
Transformers: King Grimlock
(July 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid
when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Two sources, even assuming they are both
WP:TOOSOON
, given that this is due out only later in the year.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:32, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at
Transformers: Shattered Glass
(July 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was:
This submission is not adequately supported by
Referencing for beginners and Citing sources
.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Wait until this comic book comes out and then you'll have appropriate sourcing. We cannot accept random websites and message boards.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Chris Troutman (talk) 16:31, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at
Transformers: Shattered Glass
(July 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid
when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
— Bilorv (talk) 16:35, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Copying licensed material requires attribution

Hi. I see in a recent addition to

Draft:Transformers: Shattered Glass you included material from a webpage that is available under a compatible Creative Commons Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. It's also required under the terms of the license. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa (talk
) 12:52, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Greetings. I really try to find sources based on this draft, after the release of the rebooted comic by IDW in 2021, but no avail. Only that Wiki possesses too much information, but still, I don't know what to do. It feels like I'm on my own. Sorry for this misunderstanding, but I need help. Thank you. Fico Puricelli (talk) 14:59, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Eltarian War (September 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mikehawk10 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid
when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
In addition to not meeting
non-trivially
cover the book and are independent of the book's creators. Currently, this does not appear to be the case.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
—
talk
) 00:28, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

ANI notice for copy/pasting

Information icon There is currently a discussion at

Talk
22:17, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fico_Puricelli/Archives/2021/September&oldid=1211800982"